I did read Hoffstader years ago. An organ is not totally alike a social insect 
colony. The electrons are moved at upper Newtonian, rather then via neurons, 
saavy? You don't have your liver trailing down the street after you. 

Why does that make it a poor analogy?  Is there something essential    about 
electrochemical potentials of axons?  Aren't neurons rewarded    by retrieving 
and integrating information (which are just    excitations to them).
    
    Have you not read Douglas Hofstader's conversation with an    ant-colony in 
"Godel, Escher, and Bach"?
    
    Brent
    

 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: meekerdb <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 5:57 pm
Subject: Re: It Knows That It Knows


          
    
On 7/22/2014 2:45 PM, spudboy100 via      Everything List wrote:
    
    
Ant colonies are not hooked together by neurons      passing electrons, but yhe 
are integrated, by phermones, and      behavior, such as rewards for retrieving 
food. Bees are even more      this way. So its a poor analogy comparing a human 
with a termite      hive.
    
    Why does that make it a poor analogy?  Is there something essential    
about electrochemical potentials of axons?  Aren't neurons rewarded    by 
retrieving and integrating information (which are just    excitations to them).
    
    Have you not read Douglas Hofstader's conversation with an    ant-colony in 
"Godel, Escher, and Bach"?
    
    Brent
    
    
 Now ant colonies, versus human cities is much more      accurate! Getting 
cosmic, do areas of spacetime have conscious,      self awareness? Do planck 
cells have this, and are they      interconnected? Do boltzmann brains have 
this? How intelligent      would they be? Could we communicate with such 
phenomenal minds? 
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: meekerdb <[email protected]>
      To: everything-list <[email protected]>
      Sent: 22-Jul-2014 16:27:08 +0000
      Subject: Re: It Knows That It Knows
      
      
        
          
On 7/22/2014 11:57 AM,            John Mikes wrote:
          
          
            
Bruno and Kim:              

                
what "SELF" would you consider in e.g. ants? if we                  realize the 
highly merged (individualized?) group-self                  - the answer is 
different from taking the present                  individual (simplified DOWN 
to functional minimum                  composition units) 'ant' and trying to 
assign                  a 'self' to such partial(?)                  entity. We 
may see the beginnings of such                  communalization in human 
societies as well. We "feel"                  as part of a larger unit in 
certain aspects. 
                
              
            
          
          
          A human is a colony of cells, pretty much like an ant colony.
          
          Brent
      
    
    
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to