On 7/19/2014 10:38 PM, Kim Jones wrote:



On 20 Jul 2014, at 3:11 pm, "'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

*From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *meekerdb
*Sent:* Saturday, July 19, 2014 9:49 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: It Knows That It Knows

On 7/19/2014 9:25 PM, Kim Jones wrote:

    On 20 Jul 2014, at 1:44 pm, John Clark <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Kim Jones <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            > Consciousness comes in two flavours (that I know of):

            1. I know

            2. I know that I know. (Presumably something to do with remembering 
that
            you knew.)

            Are there any others?

        Well, do you know that you know that you know? Even if the answer is 
yes after
        just a few more iteration the answer will certainly be no because you 
won't be
        able to follow even what the question means. And as a practical matter 
at least
        99% of the time you don't know that you know, you just know. Most of 
the time
        it would be counterproductive anyway, if you were fully aware of how 
you know
        that you know how to walk and chew gum at the same time you'd fall flat 
on your
        face.

          John K Clark

    OK. So what separates us then, from dolphins and elephants who apparently 
also
    'know that they know'? You aren't allowed to respond "Intelligence" because
    intelligence is what makes introspection possible in the first place. 
Without
    self-awareness there is no self to inspect. You can can question many 
things about
    the content of your consciousness. A cat can't. There needs to be a 
'knower', a
    'self' or a 'subject'. Who or what is that? What part of your brain is more 
evolved
    than a cat's brain that allows you to say "I know"?


The language part.

Brent

Let us not overlook those nifty opposable thumbs that made us superior tool 
makers.

Chris



How do language and/or opposable thumbs construct an experiencing subject?

Clearly the subject precedes the existence of these things.

No it's not clear at all.

Where does the self come from? What is it? A self constructs language and sees the value of opposable thumbs. The self is primary.

Of course even without language animals have a self concept. They know where they are, how they feel. But that doesn't mean they have the introspective ability to say "I know." Once they have language they can articulate that some people "know how", e.g. their parents know how to find food. With language they can put "I" and "know" together. It's not that different than mathematicians putting Peano's axioms and rules of inference together and "knowing arithmetic".

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to