Why don't you just call it One with a capital O 

Samiya 

> On 27-Feb-2015, at 4:23 pm, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 26 Feb 2015, at 21:52, meekerdb wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2/26/2015 3:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Fro the greek, the existence of God is a quasi-triviality, because God, by 
>>> definition, is the reality that we search. Then the real question is what 
>>> is the nature of God? A person? A physical thing? A mathematical thing? A 
>>> first principle, etc.
>> 
>> The Greeks had many concepts of the basis of reality which were not assumed 
>> to be gods, i.e. persons. Anaximander called it "aperion".  From Wikipedia:
>> 
>> "Greek philosophy entered a high level of abstraction, adopting apeiron as 
>> the origin of all things, because it is completely indefinite. This is a 
>> further transition from the previous existing mythical way of thought to the 
>> new rational way of thought which is the main characteristic of the archaic 
>> period (8th-6th century BC)."
>> 
>> So I reiterate my objection that using "God" is not only obfuscating your 
>> avowed meaning it is also wrong to say it's what the Greeks meant by the 
>> basis of reality.
> 
> 
> Yes, it is a key moment in the greek theology, where at the beginning, God 
> was considered as finite, and the infinite was confused with the indefinite, 
> and almost an insult. Later they make the infinite (apeiron) into a possible 
> attribute of the ONE, and reserve the indefinite ofr the notion of bad, or 
> matter.
> 
> If you don't like the term "God" I will use "Allah". The main point about God 
> is that it has no name, so *any* name is wrong. I did not use God, except in 
> a reply which has lead us to that infinite useless vocabulary discussion. God 
> is just the most common quasi-name (pointer).
> 
> I made clear what I meant, and the important point is the coming back to the 
> scientific attitude in theology, which is typically concerned with soul, 
> afterlife, (re)incarnation, origin of universe, transcendence, truth, 
> non-nameable, etc. It is the ONE of Parmenides and Plotinus, and it is not 
> distinguishable from arithmetical truth, in case we are machine. 
> 
> BTW, sometimes ago, you suggested here to promote my work to Templeton. How 
> is that going?
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Brent
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to