If the Chinese room is conscious (on the "systems argument" I think) that
might just be another way of eliminating consciousness, something Dennett
likes to do. I'm not sure if it is or not...

On 2 April 2015 at 16:34, Russell Standish <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:48:47AM +0200, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
> >
> > I still don't see what MGA "pumps intuitively and incorrectly", as you
> seem
> > to assume that MGA is "bad" intuition pump, rather than "good" one that
> > facilitates seeing something tricky. You've not shown that consciousness
> > supervenes on broken gates, you don't treat movies like conscious
> entities,
> > and haven't pointed towards a recording that is obviously or demonstrably
> > conscious.
> >
>
> It is one thing to argue intuitively that playing Casablanca does not
> instantiate Humphrey Bogart's consciousness. That I would happily agree
> with. It only involves a few 100KB per second. It is another thing to
> argue that a precise recording of the firings of every neuron in
> someone's brain similarly doesn't instantiate consciousness (at around
> 10^11 neurons per typical human brain, this would be something of the
> order of 10^16 bytes per second). This is the sort of recording being
> used in Maudlin's thought experiment/MGA. And obviously, according to
> COMP, a huge lookup table encoding the machine's output for every
> possible input for a machine implementing a conscious moment (which is
> just another type of recording, albeit a very complex one that would
> exceed the Seth LLoyd bound for the universe) must be conscious. Note
> this latter type of device was used in Searles Chinese Room argument,
> and I think needs to be answered the same way Dennett answers the
> Chinese Room argument.
>
> At some point on the complexity scale, recordings go from being not
> conscious to conscious. Where do you draw the line? I'm afraid
> intuition does not help much in this matter, which is why I say it is
> a weakness of the MGA.
>
> Cheers
> --
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Principal, High Performance Coders
> Visiting Professor of Mathematics      [email protected]
> University of New South Wales          http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>
>  Latest project: The Amoeba's Secret
>          (http://www.hpcoders.com.au/AmoebasSecret.html)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to