# Re: A profound lack of profundity

```
On 10 Aug 2017, at 16:35, John Clark wrote:```
```
```
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
```
```
​>> ​That does not compute. If ​BOTH answer are correct​ then the Helsinki man will see Moscow AND Washington not ​Moscow ​ OR​ Washington​. Come on Bruno, this isn't rocket science.​
```
​> ​Let us ask all the copies if any of them saw M and W.

```
```
```
By definition of the first person notion, and the question of predicting a first person experience;
```

```
The bet isn't about what any one copy will see because we already know what that will be with 100% certainty, Mr. W will see W and Mr. M will see M. The bet, at least as I see it, is "Tomorrow how many cities will beings who remember asking the question today be in?". If that's not the bet then I have no idea what the bet is and I very strongly suspect you don't know either.
```
​> ​Oops, none of them saw two cities

​One can't be in 2 cities at the same time, but 2 can be​,​
```
```

```
Sure, in the 3p views, that's part of the problem, given that after the duplication, you, in the 1p view will be unique, with probability one in Helsinki.
```
Bruno

```
and so can Bruno Marchal because Bruno Marchal​ ​has been duplicated. That's what "duplicated" means and duplication has consequences​,​ and some of them are odd, not paradoxical just odd.
```
```
I've asked the following question 4 times and you've refused to answer 4 times but I'm going to ask for a fifth time because it gets to the very heart of the topic:
```
Are the following 2 questions equivalent?

1) What will I see tomorrow?
2) Tomorrow what will the person who remembers being me right now see?

```
I can answer that question and the answer is YES. You should be able to answer it too with a simple YES or NO, and I don't want to hear any pee dodges of the question because the same level of pee and iterations of pee and any other convolutions of pee applies equally to both questions. So are they equivalent or are they not? If you can't provide a simple one word answer to that question then you quite literally don't know what you're arguing in favor of and you're wasting your time and ours.
```
John K Clark

--
```
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
```To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
```
```
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email