On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:10 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 23 Feb 2020, at 23:49, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:21 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 23 Feb 2020, at 04:11, Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't really understand your comment. I was thinking of Bruno's
>> WM-duplication. You could impose the idea that each duplication at each
>> branch point on every branch is an independent Bernoulli trial with p = 0.5
>> on this (success being defined arbitrarily as W or M). Then, if these
>> probabilities carry over from trial to trial, you end up with every binary
>> sequence, each with weight 1/2^N. Summing sequences with the same number of
>> 0s and 1s, you get the Pascal Triangle distribution that Bruno wants.
>>
>> The trouble is that such a procedure is entirely arbitrary. The only
>> probability that one could objectively assign to say, W, on each Bernoulli
>> trial is one,
>>
>>
>> That is certainly wrong. If you are correct, then P(W) = 1 is written in
>> the personal diary,
>>
>
> I did say "objectively assign". In other words, this was a 3p comment. You
> confuse 1p with 3p yet again.
>
>
> Well, if you “objectively” assign P(W) = 1, the guy in M will subjectively
> refute that prediction, and as the question was about the subjective
> accessible experience, he objectively, and predictably, refute your
> statement.
>


And if you objectively assign p(W) = p(M) = 0.5, then with the W-guy and
the M-guy will both say that your theory is refuted, since they both see
only one city: W-guy, W with p = 1.0, and the M-guy, M with p =1.0..



> If not, tell me what is your prediction in Helsinki again, by keeping in
> mind that it concerns your future subjective experience only.
>


In Helsinki I can offer no value for the probability since, given the
protocol, I know that all probabilities will be realized on repetitions of
the duplication. I cannot infer a probability from just one trial., but the
probability I infer from N repetitions can be any value in [0,1].

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLR%3DwaxzOKFupNKBVKszHgTW4CB6ruthObap7mqxdL3z7g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to