I'm confused about exactly what the nature of the problem is here. From what I can gather so far, not insisting on 1.3 means that we must withdraw support for TT fonts in AWT. Does that imply that TT fonts were not supported in AWT in 0.20.3? If so, not supporting them in 0.20.4 is not a backward step, it is the maintenance of the status quo. If some users have got used to AWT TT support in CVS versions of FOP, we can, with a little footwork, do both: we can provide a 0.20.4 release which can still be built with 1.2, without TT, for users of 0.20.3. For those users who are in the habit of building from the CVS tree, we can immediately restore the AWT TT support in the tree, while we work on a proper version-dependetn regime for the following release.
If AWT TT support was provided by some other means in 0.20.3, why don't we stick with that for now? Peter -- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerup.com.au/~pbwest "Lord, to whom shall we go?" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
