Indeed. I've had to deal with very similar issues in the past. Our best bet, IMHO, is going to be the "compile on 1.3, run on 1.2" route. Since we have far more people using binary builds than compiling from source, that route will provide the least disruption for the most people.
-----Original Message----- From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fop and JDK1.2 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm +1 for this but I can bet that's not very popular. We had a little > uproar when JDK 1.1 support was killed. I wonder how many people are > still working with JDK 1.2. It's a relatively big step from 1.1 up, but > not from 1.2 to 1.3. Unfortunately migrating to 1.3 is still not always possible. As example - IBM WebSphere 3.X series still use IBM JDK1.2.2 and there is no way to upgrade jvm without upgrading the whole WebSphere, which is of course money issue. -- Oleg Tkachenko Multiconn International Ltd, Israel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
