Peter,
The automated testing framework consists of a series of scripts that run
in a certain order, so between one script and the next, there may
sometimes be unexpected results displayed. I've had a look at the
repositories you listed, and the results all seem to be in order now.
The RSS feed also seems to be displaying the same results as the web
interface.
A repository is set not to be tested only in a few cases, among those is
when there is a more recent installable changeset revision, and the
revision currently being tested has missing components or does not pass
the tests.
--Dave B.
On 5/10/13 05:34:59.000, Peter Cock wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Dave Bouvier <d...@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
Peter,
A technical issue prevented the tests from automatically running. I've
resolved the issue and started a manual run, you should be seeing test
results within 2-3 hours.
--Dave B.
Hi Dave,
As you hoped, these test now shows up on the tool page (as expected
they are test failures - apparently my install script isn't quite right yet):
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod/a66a914c39b5
Functional test results for changeset revision a66a914c39b5 of clinod
0 tests passed, 1 tests failed, 0 tests missing test components.
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/effectivet3/5644c28cf965
Functional test results for changeset revision 5644c28cf965 of effectivet3
0 tests passed, 2 tests failed, 0 tests missing test components.
This one is more interesting, and appears to be a problem with the
test framework (both tests pass locally via run_functional_tests.sh):
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_rename/16a1a5ae98e9
Functional test results for changeset revision 16a1a5ae98e9 of seq_rename
0 tests passed, 2 tests failed, 0 tests missing test components.
I'll raise that on a new thread,
Peter
Hi again Dave,
There is something breaking intermittently - my overnight RSS feed:
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod/20e44218fa63
Functional test results for changeset revision 20e44218fa63 of clinod
0 tests passed, 0 tests failed, 0 tests missing test components.
7:38 AM (2 hours ago)
--> No test results shown (positive or negative), yet it is
listed under "Latest revision: failing tool tests"
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go/6e7694a0ae00
Functional test results for changeset revision 6e7694a0ae00 of blast2go
0 tests passed, 0 tests failed, 0 tests missing test components.
7:38 AM (2 hours ago)
--> Actually one failure due to dependency on main Tool Shed,
correctly listed under "Latest revision: failing tool tests"
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/effectivet3/c70df461aae5
Functional test results for changeset revision c70df461aae5 of effectivet3
0 tests passed, 0 tests failed, 0 tests missing test components.
7:38 AM (2 hours ago)
--> No test results shown (positive or negative), yet it is
listed under "Latest revision: failing tool tests"
These were the only three feed entries overnight from:
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/repository/get_functional_test_rss?owner=peterjc&status=all
Presumably then other tools were not tested - which makes
sense to save resources if neither the tool nor the tool shed
was updated since the last time a tool was tested.
Peter
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
