Michael Spunt schrieb:

> > * The new layout should not break the existing URLs.  Many people have
> If a user requests a page not available on the server, he / she gets
> redirected to "news", "404", "we have changed" or whatever from where he
> / she can navigate to the required page and realizes that it's time to
> update bookmarks. Backward-compatibility isn't cool. :-) Also, a new
> navigation structure would really force a new file naming and all.

a "please update your bookmarks" page would be the best choice, IMHO.

> > Maybe it could be interesting to have a look at the web sites of the
> > companies selling similar products...  You will see that all of them
> I fully agree at this point. Only that Gimp isn't a commercial product
> and needs some more comprehensive online documentation, external links,

Maybe look at other free software projects websites? For example: The
documentation section on http://www.php.net/ is a great example for
functionality but perhaps a bit overcrowded. But I like the annotated
documentation. Why not have something like that too?


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to