i2nsf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Anil Lohiya
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Senad Palislamovic
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req elopez . ietf
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Rakesh Kumar
  • [I2nsf] 答复: Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Xialiang (Frank)
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Dave Qi
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Call for WG adoption of draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req Rakesh Kumar
• [I2nsf] The I2NSF WG has placed draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" IETF Secretariat
• [I2nsf] Straw man text for proposed charter for new working group: Security Event Adrian Farrel
• [I2nsf] Doodle poll for I2NSF Interim #2: NSF Facing Interface related drafts Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Sketch minutes from today's virtual interim Adrian Farrel
  • Re: [I2nsf] Sketch minutes from today's virtual interim Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Sketch minutes from today's virtual interim Adrian Farrel
• [I2nsf] Comments on draft-kumar-i2nsfcontroller-use-cases-00.txt versus draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.txt Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] Comments on draft-kumar-i2nsfcontroller-use-cases-00.txt versus draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.txt Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Comments on draft-kumar-i2nsfcontroller-use-cases-00.txt versus draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.txt Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is the "Security Service Function (SSF)" in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is the "Security Service Function (SSF)" in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Daniel Migault
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is the "Security Service Function (SSF)" in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is the "Security Service Function (SSF)" in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Daniel Migault
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Daniel Migault
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is the “Security Service Function (SSF)” in draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration same as the NSF defined by the I2NSF-problem-and-use-cases? Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Why do we have "negotiation" for the "Control Plane" Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Why do we have "negotiation" for the "Control Plane" John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Why do we have "negotiation" for the "Control Plane" Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Why do we have "negotiation" for the "Control Plane" John Strassner
• [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" Annika Sparkles
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] Terminology discussion #2: "capability" & "capability interface" John Strassner
• [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Natale, Bob
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model elopez . ietf
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model elopez . ietf
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Annika Sparkles
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Annika Sparkles
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology's definition on "ACL" is different from ietf-netmod-acl-model Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] Conference Bridge for I2NSF virtual Interim meeting: Terminology Draft discussion Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Conference Bridge for I2NSF virtual Interim meeting: Terminology Draft discussion Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] FW: I2NSF Interim meeting: Terminology discussion webex
• [I2nsf] Updated doodle pool for the I2NSF virtual Interim meetings: doodle poll for a possible time slot Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Fwd: NomCom 2016-2017: Call for Nominations Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] I2NSF virtual Interim meetings: doodle poll for a possible time slot Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] i2nsf - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 97 "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool"
• [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-03.txt internet-drafts
• [I2nsf] comments on draft-basprez-i2nsf-capabilities-00 Daniel Migault
  • [I2nsf] 答复: comments on draft-basprez-i2nsf-capabilities-00 Xialiang (Frank)
  • Re: [I2nsf] 答复: comments on draft-basprez-i2nsf-capabilities-00 Daniel Migault
  • Re: [I2nsf] comments on draft-basprez-i2nsf-capabilities-00 Aldo Basile
• [I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kumar-i2nsf-controller-use-cases-00.txt Rakesh Kumar
• [I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00.txt Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00.txt Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00.txt Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00.txt Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-kumar-i2nsf-client-facing-interface-req-00.txt Rakesh Kumar
• [I2nsf] IETF 96 I2NSF session meeting minutes has been posted Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection and SD-WAN Yoav Nir
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection and SD-WAN David Carrel
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection and SD-WAN Yoav Nir
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection and SD-WAN Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection and SD-WAN Sowmini Varadhan
• [I2nsf] An analysis of security services worth considering Diego R. Lopez
• [I2nsf] Please check your presentation uploaded to make sure they the latest version Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-gap-analysis-02.txt internet-drafts
• [I2nsf] I2NSF session: need notes taker and Jabber scribe Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF session: need notes taker and Jabber scribe Xialiang (Frank)
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF session: need notes taker and Jabber scribe Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF session: need notes taker and Jabber scribe Diego R. Lopez
• [I2nsf] Please send your I2NSF session presentation slides to Chairs ASAP Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Meeting Room "Tegel" : Wed, July 20 3:50pm Berlin time is set for the side meeting to address multiple drafts on the information and data models over the "NSF facing interface" Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Wed, July 20 3:50pm Berlin time is set for the side meeting to address multiple drafts on the information and data models over the "NSF facing interface" Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] FW: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-15.txt> (RESTCONF Protocol) to Proposed Standard Adrian Farrel
• [I2nsf] IETF 96 I2NSF preliminary agenda has been posted Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-02.txt Rakesh Kumar
• [I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hares-i2nsf-ddos-yang-dm-00.txt Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] side meeting in Berlin to address multiple drafts on the information and data models over the "NSF facing interface" Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-01.txt internet-drafts
• [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-abad-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-00.txt Rafa Marin Lopez
• [I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.txt Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-01.txt internet-drafts
• [I2nsf] Berlin I2NSF F2F meeting agenda consideration, and how to align mutliple drafts on the "Customer Facing Interface" and "NSF facing interface" Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-baspez-i2nsf-capabilities-00.txt Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-baspez-i2nsf-capabilities-00.txt Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-baspez-i2nsf-capabilities-00.txt Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-baspez-i2nsf-capabilities-00.txt Diego R. Lopez
• [I2nsf] FW: New Version Notification for draft-you-i2nsf-user-group-based-policy-02.txt Youjianjie
• [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pastor-i2nsf-vnsf-attestation-03.txt Diego R. Lopez
• [I2nsf] draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-00.txt Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-00.txt Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-00.txt Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-00.txt Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] draft-jeong-i2nsf-capability-interface-yang: can't extract your YANG module Benoit Claise
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-jeong-i2nsf-capability-interface-yang: can't extract your YANG module Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • Re: [I2nsf] draft-jeong-i2nsf-capability-interface-yang: can't extract your YANG module Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Rakesh Kumar
  • Re: [I2nsf] A New I-D on Northbound Interfaces for Security Policy Controllers : A Framework and Information Model Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Need a contribution on I2NSF Requirements for extensions to existing (& new) protocols Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-02.txt internet-drafts
• [I2nsf] An Updated I-D of Software-Defined Networking Based Security Services using Interface to Network Security Functions Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• [I2nsf] A New I-D on YANG Data Model of Interface to Network Security Functions Capability Interface Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• [I2nsf] A New I-D on Service Function Chaining-Enabled I2NSF Architecture Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • [I2nsf] Comments to Service Function Chaining-Enabled I2NSF Architecture Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] A New I-D on An Architecture for Security Management in I2NSF Framework Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• [I2nsf] Posting new drafts Adrian Farrel
• Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-yang-00.txt Susan Hares
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-hares-i2nsf-capability-yang-00.txt Xialiang (Frank)
• [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-xia-i2nsf-capability-interface-im-06.txt Xialiang (Frank)
  • Re: [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-xia-i2nsf-capability-interface-im-06.txt IMTL YunSuk Yeo
  • [I2nsf] 答复: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-xia-i2nsf-capability-interface-im-06.txt Xialiang (Frank)
• [I2nsf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-01.txt Xialiang (Frank)
• Re: [I2nsf] [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"? Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-01.txt internet-drafts
• Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration-00.txt Daniel Migault
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration-00.txt mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration-00.txt Daniel Migault
  • [I2nsf] Categoried under "Client Facing Interface"? (was RE: New Version Notification for draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration-00.txt Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration-00.txt mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [I2nsf] New Version Notification for draft-mglt-i2nsf-ssf-collaboration-00.txt Daniel Migault
• [I2nsf] i2nsf - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 96 "IETF Secretariat"
• [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? mohamed.boucadair
  • Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? Loa Andersson
  • Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? John Strassner
  • [I2nsf] what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? (was RE: Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? (was RE: Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? (was RE: Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"? Diego R. Lopez
  • [I2nsf] Is "Requester " a better name? (was RE: what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is "Requester " a better name? (was RE: what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is "Requester " a better name? (was RE: what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is "Requester " a better name? (was RE: what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Is "Requester " a better name? (was RE: what is the "client" to I2NSF controller? Rakesh Kumar
• [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Adrian Farrel
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Diego R. Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] Starting to think about an agenda for I2NSF in Berlin Susan Hares
• [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] I2NSF Terminology draft : Is it better to have two distinct terminologies to differentiate the “Client to controller” from the “Client to NSFs”? John Strassner
• [I2nsf] IETF 96 Preliminary Agenda comes out: I2NSF session time & location. Please let us know ASAP if you plan to present but have conflict Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Sowmini Varadhan
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Sowmini Varadhan
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Sowmini Varadhan
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Sowmini Varadhan
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Sowmini Varadhan
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] [IPsec] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Rafa Marin Lopez
  • Re: [I2nsf] How does Overlay Network inform the Underlay network on which flows among Overlay network nodes need to go through IPSec Tunnel? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Sowmini Varadhan
• Re: [I2nsf] : Any use cases of Overlay network requesting IPSec connection from the Underlay for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Linda Dunbar
• [I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Linda Dunbar
  • Re: [I2nsf] Can Overlay nodes see any difference on how ECMP is used by the underlay in building the IPSec tunnels for a specific time span? (was : Flow Security Policies exchanged over I2NSF service layer interface? Xuxiaohu
• Re: [I2nsf] 答复: questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00 Dacheng Zhang
  • Re: [I2nsf] 答复: questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00 John Strassner
  • Re: [I2nsf] questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00 DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
  • Re: [I2nsf] 答复: questions about some terminologies defined by draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-00 Dacheng Zhang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages