I am one of you- though disappointed and resigned. I look back over my
life as a grief of love. Take my heart but spare me my money. The last
time I heard "jaded" was from my highschool sweetheart who I dated for
a year after he divorced from a 30 year marriage. He was still a jerk
and died soon after I left him. Stuff happens.

On May 4, 3:54�pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmm...I don't know, from what I hear, age is no barrier to love nor lust. ;)
>
> Glad to have you aboard. Strong opening salvo, though! No soft spot at
> all for us romantics?
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for Monday's laugh! One is allowed. Two would be lethal.// I
> > wasn't sure this thought would get through but I would like to read
> > along in this group. I am a grandmother so somewhat protected from
> > foolish fancy even in the lusty month of May. I lust after William
> > Safire. :-) Anyway, thanks for the welcome.//
>
> > On May 4, 10:35 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Ah, the voice of the jaded.
>
> >> Welcome, Rigsy. Care to tell us a story?
>
> >> [ Attached Message ]From:rigsy03 <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> >> <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 06:16:08 -0700 
> >> (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 8:16 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the 
> >> nature of Love?
>
> >> Love is a myth and marketing tool.
>
> >> On May 4, 8:10 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Not always, but definitely at least sometimes. There is much healing in 
> >> > a loving touch.
>
> >> > [ Attached Message ]From:Rosey <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> >> > <[email protected]>Date:Mon, 4 May 2009 05:53:04 -0700 
> >> > (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 7:53 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is the 
> >> > nature of Love?
>
> >> > Is affection healing? Can a person kiss and hug the pain away? I
> >> > believe this tactic works. But for some it does not.
>
> >> > On May 4, 8:41 am, Molly Brogan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > I think I understand and I do appreciate your words here Vam. We all,
> >> > > each of us, deserve to be surrounded by those that love us
> >> > > unconditionally, and allow us to be who we are as we evolve and
> >> > > awaken. The key for me has been to provide this to those around me. I
> >> > > have found that in doing so, I am surrounded by folks who can love in
> >> > > the same way. This does not mean that I allow myself to be exploited
> >> > > or abused, because I think that a part of unconditional love is
> >> > > bringing such behavior by the other to light, and then moving away
> >> > > from it, allowing the other to learn or not. There are times when
> >> > > compassion is enough and the relationship becoming peripheral is in
> >> > > perfect order. Your unconditional love then includes honesty,
> >> > > appreciation and psychological safety for all. These can be provided
> >> > > through deep intimacy or great distance. There is a grace that leads
> >> > > the way.
>
> >> > > On May 4, 12:49 am, Vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > " Affection, in all forms, is an extremely valuable and important 
> >> > > > part
> >> > > > of the relationship to me ... "
>
> >> > > > And Grace, both while giving to and receiving from ... But, valuable
> >> > > > and important as they are, these are still the atmospherics. The
> >> > > > crucial part is the quality of ' being ' individuals sense within
> >> > > > themselves, and the opportunity they have to ' be ' themselves, to
> >> > > > grow and evolve and continue to transform the ' I - Space ' within to
> >> > > > greater sense of strength, happiness, freedom and self - discovery.
>
> >> > > > We are all striving for that rich and pregnant ground of ' I - space 
> >> > > > '
> >> > > > in which our finitude dissolves. The others are important to us, in
> >> > > > this context, for the atmospherics they cause or contribute to. It 
> >> > > > can
> >> > > > aid or mar the ' awakening.'
>
> >> > > > We each love the other, for the love of our Self !
>
> >> > > > ( I waited long before punching the ' Send ' button, wondering if 
> >> > > > what
> >> > > > I'm posting makes any sense. Even, if it is appropriate ? )
>
> >> > > > On May 4, 7:57 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > I think (a very necessary disclaimer in topics such as these) that 
> >> > > > > the secret may be to only require commitment from your partner, to 
> >> > > > > continue to freely be who you are, and expect the same from them, 
> >> > > > > and to strive for the happy balance of compromise and acceptance 
> >> > > > > in the places where friction inevitably occurs. Sometimes we align 
> >> > > > > ourselves with partners who have drastically different life goals, 
> >> > > > > and that's simply not possible. Other times our partners, or we 
> >> > > > > ourselves, are in a self destructive place which is simply not 
> >> > > > > conducive to a healthy relationship. If, however, we are both 
> >> > > > > aligned similarly, and both committed to that goal, then a zen 
> >> > > > > state of love, where it is not questioned, but simply is, seems to 
> >> > > > > me to be the path to a long term bliss.
>
> >> > > > > If everyday, despite the day I've had, I make the effort to 
> >> > > > > express some portion of Eros energy to my partner, even if in no 
> >> > > > > other form than text message, I've "been", in the zen sense, 
> >> > > > > affirmed the love, made it be by being it. When that is affirmed 
> >> > > > > in reply, that circle is completed. The actual physical 
> >> > > > > expenditure of the ritual is miniscule, yet the effect is powerful.
>
> >> > > > > Affection, in all forms, is an extremely valuable and important 
> >> > > > > part of the relationship to me, which Is just one of the many ides 
> >> > > > > of Love I inherit from my Father. He's still married to my Mom, 
> >> > > > > and from all appearances, still in love with her in an Eros kind 
> >> > > > > of way. :-D It's a strong archetype to have in your head of what a 
> >> > > > > long term love can be. I can't imagine the idea of my Father being 
> >> > > > > unfaithful to my Mom. It's inconceivable to me.
>
> >> > > > > It strikes me Neil that one of the problems with Love is that most 
> >> > > > > of the wisdom about it doesn't come until our later years, and 
> >> > > > > many of us either don't have a proper Sage around, or are a bit 
> >> > > > > too damn fool hardy in our youths to listen if we do.
>
> >> > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:archytas 
> >> > > > > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> >> > > > > <[email protected]>Date:Sun, 3 May 2009 18:30:21 -0700 
> >> > > > > (PDT)Local:Mon, May 4 2009 6:30 amSubject:[Mind's Eye] Re: What is 
> >> > > > > the nature of Love?
>
> >> > > > > There is some thinking that love is over-stated and leads to over-
> >> > > > > expectation, perhaps rather strangely making loving relationship 
> >> > > > > more
> >> > > > > difficult than it needs to be. Raising any of us fallible humans 
> >> > > > > to a
> >> > > > > golden pedestal is to put whoever it is before a fall. One can
> >> > > > > certainly be loving and it appears this can be reciprocal, though 
> >> > > > > I'd
> >> > > > > expect this to be less than perfect or bound in mutual illusions.
> >> > > > > Freedom from exploitation seems key to me, along with some form of
> >> > > > > understanding on equality. I can say that I wish I had been better
> >> > > > > able to enjoy sex earlier in my life through some decent education
> >> > > > > about it.
>
> >> > > > > On 4 May, 01:07, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > Exactly, trust is essential to the bond, it is the adhesive 
> >> > > > > > quality
> >> > > > > > that transforms two into one. The bond can be broken and 
> >> > > > > > repaired but
> >> > > > > > it forever has the crack that remains a visible detraction and
> >> > > > > > possibly a perpetual doubt which can fester at anytime under 
> >> > > > > > testing
> >> > > > > > situations, such as out of town overnight business meetings or 
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > introduction of a past friend, literally anything can set off the
> >> > > > > > process of relationship erosion. I can only wish that everyone 
> >> > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > find that special soul mate and live happily ever after.
>
> >> > > > > > On May 3, 3:54 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> 
> >> > > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > I agree completely about fidelity. For some, a dip in another 
> >> > > > > > > pool provides added excitement...but for me, it cracks the 
> >> > > > > > > foundation of the love I have, irreparably, no matter which 
> >> > > > > > > person is to blame. Trust is key for me, and without 
> >> > > > > > > faithfulness, there is no trust.
>
> >> > > > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:Slip Disc 
> >> > > > > > > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> >> > > > > > > <[email protected]>Date:Sun, 3 May 2009 12:48:43 
> >> > > > > > > -0700 (PDT)Local:Sun, May 3 2009 2:48 pmSubject:[Mind's Eye] 
> >> > > > > > > Re: What is the nature of Love?
>
> >> > > > > > > It must be Chris being that you posted twice on it, lol, 
> >> > > > > > > thanks.
>
> >> > > > > > > I might add that much of my feelings at this point are based 
> >> > > > > > > on the
> >> > > > > > > fact that she is without exception my best friend in the 
> >> > > > > > > world. The
> >> > > > > > > monogamy issue for me is moot as I would hurt as much as she 
> >> > > > > > > would,
> >> > > > > > > and mutually so. I guess in that sense the love factor reveals 
> >> > > > > > > itself
> >> > > > > > > to be the core driven emotion that keeps us together. When that
> >> > > > > > > emotion is present, the thought of infidelity never enters the 
> >> > > > > > > mind.
> >> > > > > > > Love, being faithful, gives relationships integrity and 
> >> > > > > > > provides a
> >> > > > > > > sound platform on which to continue building. Newly founded
> >> > > > > > > relationships or marriages are like a complete white circle 
> >> > > > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > accumulates black spots for each little transgression, larger 
> >> > > > > > > spots
> >> > > > > > > for more serious infractions. As time goes by the circle may 
> >> > > > > > > seem
> >> > > > > > > more black than white and the imbalance weighs heavier on the 
> >> > > > > > > side of
> >> > > > > > > failure due to the loss of integrity, eventually with nothing 
> >> > > > > > > left the
> >> > > > > > > relationship collapses. We can fantasize all we want about how 
> >> > > > > > > much
> >> > > > > > > greener the grass is on the other side but truth is it takes 
> >> > > > > > > mutual
> >> > > > > > > effort no matter where the grass is. I would venture to guess 
> >> > > > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > there is that one perfect soul mate relationship out there 
> >> > > > > > > waiting for
> >> > > > > > > us to find it, that being the hardest part of it all.
>
> >> > > > > > > On Apr 29, 11:45 pm, Chris Jenkins 
> >> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > I think this is my favorite post from you ever, Slip.
>
> >> > > > > > > > [ Attached Message ]From:Slip Disc 
> >> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>To:"\"Minds Eye\"" 
> >> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>Date:Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:24:10
>
> ...
>
> read more �- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to