Even better than getting beaten is getting laid, but that wouldn't be an
appropriate proposition now would it. *chuckles
On 12/6/2010 1:41 PM, iam deheretic wrote:
gabby did I leave out the part we will forget to tell the police
offers you have my permission,, ;o) after we want an unbiased judgement.
Allan
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:39 PM, iam deheretic <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Gabby I do not have to backup my existence without a tombstone,
that is easy we will meet in some city center make sure there are
several police persons there the more the merrier .. then you
have my permission th beat the shit out of me,, now we will let
those fine officers decide whether I exist or not.. I would offer
to reverse the roles but I have no doubt of your existence and
need no proof.
Allan
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:14 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Na, that door won't open! Just like the demand to back up your
existence with your tombstone! To be a human being, Francis,
the trick
is to keep breathing! Just like time only exists in its
substantial
sense! Thanks for reminding us, RP.
On 6 Dez., 15:34, rigsy03 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> For instance, is Julian Assange our Martin Luther? From the
Diet of
> Worms to our can of worms? From 95 Theses to ? Think about
it. :-)
>
> On Dec 6, 6:05 am, RP Singh <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > Why think of time in any sense at all , but doesn't it
seem reasonable to
> > believe that there have always been universes and life
and death will
> > continue in infinity whereas it is accepted that this
universe began and
> > will end. My point is that like God Creation with a chain
of universes will
> > continue in eternity.
>
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Ash <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > RP I don't think that time exists in a substantial
sense, except to
> > > explain sequences of events or provide reference
states/events. From what we
> > > do know of it, if I am correct, time is relative, and I
am beginning to
> > > think of it similarly to gravity. In my view the present
can and the past
> > > has been affected by the future. Through this I accept
causality but deny
> > > determinism.
>
> > > Now why cloak explanation in very human terms like
happiness and
> > > loneliness? What is pleasurable and painful to this
trans-being? This
> > > implies to me a changeful One, not eternal and
omnipotent in the linear
> > > senses usually attributed. But something alive, with
living parts which have
> > > an impact on the whole. Sorry if I am putting words in
your mouth, care to
> > > clarify more?
>
> > > On 12/5/2010 11:14 PM, RP Singh wrote:
>
> > > Ash my meaning is that God finds his happiness in his
creation and
> > > therefore , though universes have a beginning and an end
, Creation has no
> > > beginning and no end as there would always be universes
before and after the
> > > present universes. In other words there would be no
beginning or end of
> > > time.
>
> > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Ash <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > >> This leads us to the question of the existence of our
universe at all, if
> > >> a being existed: omnipresent, omniscient, eternal; what
point would there be
> > >> to creating our universe?
>
> > >> On 12/5/2010 12:12 PM, RP Singh wrote:
>
> > >> Francis , if creation were to have a beginning and an
end the eternity of
> > >> God would have no meaning as it is in creation that
God's presence is felt.
> > >> God would have become a very lonely fellow.
>
> > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:08 PM, frantheman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> > wrote:
>
> > >>> RP, I've asked the question before and I'll ask it again:
>
> > >>> Who sez?
>
> > >>> Any of us can make pronouncements ... about anything.
The trick is to
> > >>> back them up.
>
> > >>> Francis
>
> > >>> On 5 Dez., 16:09, RP <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > >>> > There is no beginning or end of God. He is eternal.
There is no
> > >>> > beginning or end of creation. Before this universe
there were other
> > >>> > universes and after this universe there will be
other universes. In
> > >>> > fact there is no point in time when there was a
first universe or
> > >>> > there will be a last universe. God and Creation are
both eternal , it
> > >>> > is us beings that are finite.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--
(
)
I_D Allan
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
--
(
)
I_D Allan
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
