My wife would object and I don't cheat on my wife.. but if I was not married I would take it under serious consideration. and you are right done in front of policepersons and several reporters whould also have the desired effect and be a much more pleasant experience. Allan
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > Even better than getting beaten is getting laid, but that wouldn't be an > appropriate proposition now would it. *chuckles > > > On 12/6/2010 1:41 PM, iam deheretic wrote: > > gabby did I leave out the part we will forget to tell the police offers you > have my permission,, ;o) after we want an unbiased judgement. > Allan > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:39 PM, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gabby I do not have to backup my existence without a tombstone, that is >> easy we will meet in some city center make sure there are several police >> persons there the more the merrier .. then you have my permission th beat >> the shit out of me,, now we will let those fine officers decide whether I >> exist or not.. I would offer to reverse the roles but I have no doubt of >> your existence and need no proof. >> Allan >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:14 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Na, that door won't open! Just like the demand to back up your >>> existence with your tombstone! To be a human being, Francis, the trick >>> is to keep breathing! Just like time only exists in its substantial >>> sense! Thanks for reminding us, RP. >>> >>> On 6 Dez., 15:34, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > For instance, is Julian Assange our Martin Luther? From the Diet of >>> > Worms to our can of worms? From 95 Theses to ? Think about it. :-) >>> > >>> > On Dec 6, 6:05 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Why think of time in any sense at all , but doesn't it seem >>> reasonable to >>> > > believe that there have always been universes and life and death >>> will >>> > > continue in infinity whereas it is accepted that this universe began >>> and >>> > > will end. My point is that like God Creation with a chain of >>> universes will >>> > > continue in eternity. >>> > >>> > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > RP I don't think that time exists in a substantial sense, except >>> to >>> > > > explain sequences of events or provide reference states/events. >>> From what we >>> > > > do know of it, if I am correct, time is relative, and I am >>> beginning to >>> > > > think of it similarly to gravity. In my view the present can and >>> the past >>> > > > has been affected by the future. Through this I accept causality >>> but deny >>> > > > determinism. >>> > >>> > > > Now why cloak explanation in very human terms like happiness and >>> > > > loneliness? What is pleasurable and painful to this trans-being? >>> This >>> > > > implies to me a changeful One, not eternal and omnipotent in the >>> linear >>> > > > senses usually attributed. But something alive, with living parts >>> which have >>> > > > an impact on the whole. Sorry if I am putting words in your mouth, >>> care to >>> > > > clarify more? >>> > >>> > > > On 12/5/2010 11:14 PM, RP Singh wrote: >>> > >>> > > > Ash my meaning is that God finds his happiness in his creation and >>> > > > therefore , though universes have a beginning and an end , Creation >>> has no >>> > > > beginning and no end as there would always be universes before and >>> after the >>> > > > present universes. In other words there would be no beginning or >>> end of >>> > > > time. >>> > >>> > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > >> This leads us to the question of the existence of our universe at >>> all, if >>> > > >> a being existed: omnipresent, omniscient, eternal; what point >>> would there be >>> > > >> to creating our universe? >>> > >>> > > >> On 12/5/2010 12:12 PM, RP Singh wrote: >>> > >>> > > >> Francis , if creation were to have a beginning and an end the >>> eternity of >>> > > >> God would have no meaning as it is in creation that God's presence >>> is felt. >>> > > >> God would have become a very lonely fellow. >>> > >>> > > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:08 PM, frantheman < >>> [email protected] >>> > > >> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > >>> RP, I've asked the question before and I'll ask it again: >>> > >>> > > >>> Who sez? >>> > >>> > > >>> Any of us can make pronouncements ... about anything. The trick >>> is to >>> > > >>> back them up. >>> > >>> > > >>> Francis >>> > >>> > > >>> On 5 Dez., 16:09, RP <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > There is no beginning or end of God. He is eternal. There is no >>> > > >>> > beginning or end of creation. Before this universe there were >>> other >>> > > >>> > universes and after this universe there will be other >>> universes. In >>> > > >>> > fact there is no point in time when there was a first universe >>> or >>> > > >>> > there will be a last universe. God and Creation are both >>> eternal , it >>> > > >>> > is us beings that are finite.- Hide quoted text - >>> > >>> > > - Show quoted text - >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ( >> ) >> I_D Allan >> >> If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken >> Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, >> >> > > > -- > ( > ) > I_D Allan > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, > > > -- ( ) I_D Allan If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
