Well certainly not with the police standing by watching! Either way gabby get locked up for assalt or solicitation. At least in the second proposition both could enjoy and Allen would be joining her in the clink!
On Dec 6, 7:08 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > Even better than getting beaten is getting laid, but that wouldn't be an > appropriate proposition now would it. *chuckles > > On 12/6/2010 1:41 PM, iam deheretic wrote: > > > > > gabby did I leave out the part we will forget to tell the police > > offers you have my permission,, ;o) after we want an unbiased judgement. > > Allan > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:39 PM, iam deheretic <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Gabby I do not have to backup my existence without a tombstone, > > that is easy we will meet in some city center make sure there are > > several police persons there the more the merrier .. then you > > have my permission th beat the shit out of me,, now we will let > > those fine officers decide whether I exist or not.. I would offer > > to reverse the roles but I have no doubt of your existence and > > need no proof. > > Allan > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:14 PM, gabbydott <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Na, that door won't open! Just like the demand to back up your > > existence with your tombstone! To be a human being, Francis, > > the trick > > is to keep breathing! Just like time only exists in its > > substantial > > sense! Thanks for reminding us, RP. > > > On 6 Dez., 15:34, rigsy03 <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > For instance, is Julian Assange our Martin Luther? From the > > Diet of > > > Worms to our can of worms? From 95 Theses to ? Think about > > it. :-) > > > > On Dec 6, 6:05 am, RP Singh <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > Why think of time in any sense at all , but doesn't it > > seem reasonable to > > > > believe that there have always been universes and life > > and death will > > > > continue in infinity whereas it is accepted that this > > universe began and > > > > will end. My point is that like God Creation with a chain > > of universes will > > > > continue in eternity. > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Ash <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > RP I don't think that time exists in a substantial > > sense, except to > > > > > explain sequences of events or provide reference > > states/events. From what we > > > > > do know of it, if I am correct, time is relative, and I > > am beginning to > > > > > think of it similarly to gravity. In my view the present > > can and the past > > > > > has been affected by the future. Through this I accept > > causality but deny > > > > > determinism. > > > > > > Now why cloak explanation in very human terms like > > happiness and > > > > > loneliness? What is pleasurable and painful to this > > trans-being? This > > > > > implies to me a changeful One, not eternal and > > omnipotent in the linear > > > > > senses usually attributed. But something alive, with > > living parts which have > > > > > an impact on the whole. Sorry if I am putting words in > > your mouth, care to > > > > > clarify more? > > > > > > On 12/5/2010 11:14 PM, RP Singh wrote: > > > > > > Ash my meaning is that God finds his happiness in his > > creation and > > > > > therefore , though universes have a beginning and an end > > , Creation has no > > > > > beginning and no end as there would always be universes > > before and after the > > > > > present universes. In other words there would be no > > beginning or end of > > > > > time. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Ash <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > >> This leads us to the question of the existence of our > > universe at all, if > > > > >> a being existed: omnipresent, omniscient, eternal; what > > point would there be > > > > >> to creating our universe? > > > > > >> On 12/5/2010 12:12 PM, RP Singh wrote: > > > > > >> Francis , if creation were to have a beginning and an > > end the eternity of > > > > >> God would have no meaning as it is in creation that > > God's presence is felt. > > > > >> God would have become a very lonely fellow. > > > > > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:08 PM, frantheman > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >>> RP, I've asked the question before and I'll ask it again: > > > > > >>> Who sez? > > > > > >>> Any of us can make pronouncements ... about anything. > > The trick is to > > > > >>> back them up. > > > > > >>> Francis > > > > > >>> On 5 Dez., 16:09, RP <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > >>> > There is no beginning or end of God. He is eternal. > > There is no > > > > >>> > beginning or end of creation. Before this universe > > there were other > > > > >>> > universes and after this universe there will be > > other universes. In > > > > >>> > fact there is no point in time when there was a > > first universe or > > > > >>> > there will be a last universe. God and Creation are > > both eternal , it > > > > >>> > is us beings that are finite.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > ( > > ) > > I_D Allan > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, > > > -- > > ( > > ) > > I_D Allan > > > If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken > > Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
