On Sat, August 18, 2007 8:03 pm, Timothy Normand Miller said:
> On 8/18/07, Farhan Mohamed Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Attached is the radix-4 multiplier. Since it was easy to make it
>> signed, i just went with that. Adding support to select signed/unsigned
>> is also easy. Can someone with the Lattice tools try synthesizing this?
>> I don't have it installed on my laptop as i'm running out of space. On
>> xilinx i get just under 7.2ns, which is the delay through the 33 bit
>> adder/subtracter. Takes 17 cycles to complete a 32x32 multiply.
> 
> This is cool stuff.  For one thing, I think I need to read up on some of
> the Verilog 2001 syntax.  I learned Verilog in 1999, so I'm a bit behind
> the times and could benefit from some things that would at least save
> some typing.
> 
> Anyhow, what I think would be fun is to try out a variety of designs and
> compare them.  Different approaches will take different numbers of clock
> cycles, require different amounts of logic area, and have different
> maximum clock rates.  A wide exploration of this space could be of
> academic interest.  Perhaps a journal would be interested in a submission
> on this.  Or perhaps we're repeating work already done, but it still
> might be nice to offer some reference implementations under GPL and/or
> LGPL with known characteristics for certain FPGAs.
> 
> On the other hand, we should avoid getting TOO distracted.  The 
> nanocontroller is something someone's bound to want to incorporate into
> another design, and of course, it's in our main path for OGA1.
> 
I could try a radix-8 version, which will further cut down the number of
 clock cycles to 9 or 10. It should not take much more hardware. The adder
 will have to be a bit longer though (about 35 bits i think), and the 
lookup table will be larger, so that will increase the critical path delay
but hopefully only slightly.

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to