rb47 wrote:

Phill,

Well, if your system is running with 640 Megs of ram, it must have some
kind of special over-ride type of hardware to be able to do so - from
everything that has been published, both from Microsoft as well as other
sources I have seen, 98 just was not setup to be able to handle any
amount of ram greater than 512 Megs.

Trying to do so exceeds the internal calculations built-in into 98, and
causes immense types of problems, such as lock-ups, erratic operations,
and any number of other issues as well - none of which is in anyway
shape or form wanted, believe me.

BAH AND HUMBUG!!!!

Ralph


Phill wrote:


Don't know what causes this - have only heard about it.  I am writing
this on a PIII 500/ MS Windows 98SE with 640M Ram, recognised and
running according to Belarc Advisor and POST .  Maybe it's a hardware
specific problem?

Phill
Nice warm South Gippsland AU (Low 30 degrees (Centigrade) today forecast)

Hi Ralph

Sorry but as I said, this system runs well with out anything special unless it was on the motherboard (Giga-Byte i440BX-8671) from day one and the ram is recognized by windows according to the system resource and by Belarc. Don't know why or how but it does.

Phill
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to