What board do you have in your system?

Have you considered using Virtual PC or VMWare to run 98?

http://www.microsoft.com/products/info/product.aspx?view=22&pcid=ba9e68ed-9571-4d10-82d2-b51828c33297&type=ovr
http://www.vmware.com/products/desktop/ws_features.html

I've used both in the past, not the current releases mind you, and both have performed very well.

When compatibility mode just isn't compatible these tool are invaluable :)

Peter Kaulback

In the hour of 01:33 PM 2/19/2004, rb47 spoke this:

To one and all,

I have found that I am running into a very frustrating situation with
having to have my system dual boot with Win98SE and WinXP Pro.

Turns out due to the 98 issue, I can not put more than the current 512
Megs of ram in the system, though I followed the way to do things as
given in the Microsoft support database on what to do - seems you just
can NOT run a system having 98 with more than 512 Megs of ram. I bought
and installed another 512 Megs of ram, and got lockups, and all kinds of
other problems like I could not believe, so had to go back to the
original 512 Megs. of ram to get things stable.

So the question I have deals with running XP with just 512 Megs of ram -
how effectively does XP work with this amount of ram???

The issues I am potentially going to have to deal with involve editing
audio and video files in XP, and this is especially one area I dont know
how much potential problem would I be facing with just having the 512
Megs of ram. I have over 300 Gigs of hard drive space to work with from
that standpoint, so hopefully XP would effectively use that space whan
ram was not available. I know it is not like the speed of ram but not
much I can do on that issue it would seem.
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to