On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:15:54PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, "Garry R. Osgood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The latest is very good too, but the bristles are pointing the wrong way
> > (they would point *into* the ink blot as the brush pushes to the left).
> > I guess t
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 01:13:31AM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> Carey is right with the branding! Photoshop is known by it's eye, corel
> draw by it's balloon (so maybe the balloon isn't very well suited for the
> gimp), Illustrator by the venus and so on.
Corel's balloon is just boring. It's got
Thus spoke Tom Rathborne
> Right now I think Wilber only shows up in the "Tip of the day" box. I
> think he should be on the splash screen, on the about page, and
> perhaps even in the help files. If the help files will be based on
> GUM, which I imagine is a very structured document, maybe we co
Thus spoke Carey Bunks
> Don't you think, though, that it would be good if the GIMP had an
> identity? I think the marketing types call it something like
> "branding"...an image that when folks see it they say, "oh yeah,
> that's the GIMP". If the splash is always changing, I think it will
> jus
I don't know if I shoudl submit this here but I had a very succesful clean
build on both a redhat 6.0 and 6.1 box. I gave it a good workout and
tested all the perl plugins and they ran great. It's nice not to get the
"grok colour 0" errors any more.
Many thanks to the developers who ivest so mu
GIMP 1.1.15 is out there.
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/unstable/v1.1.15/
Lots of bug fixes, UI work, i18n stuff. Details in ChangeLog.
-Yosh
On Don, 13 Jan 2000 wrote the famous Carey Bunks:
>Don't you think, though, that it would be good if the GIMP had an
>identity? I think the marketing types call it something like
>"branding"...an image that when folks see it they say, "oh yeah,
>that's the GIMP". If the splash is always changin
> I was alerted by Stanislav Brabec about a problem with menu
> translations. In his translation of Logulator to czech, he properly
> changed all occurences of "Logulator", but, while the gimp displays the
> menus _within_ the Filters/Logulator menu correctly, the Logulator menu
> itself NOT being
Well, I had to do a 3.0.5, due to a bug that Dave Hill spotted last
night. This bug causes a null pointer dereference on any attempt to
print in color to a printer that only supports CMY (not CMYK)
printing, such as the Epson Stylus Color 1500 (or the HP Deskjet 600
that he uses). This bug has b
> I've been checking CVS Gimp with some "real users" lately.
>
> One complaint was that there is no obvious way to rotate the image. Of
> course, WE all know it's the transform tool in rotation mode, but it's not
> trivial to guess: the tip for the tool just says "Transform".
>
> Do you agree to
Carey et al.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 04:48:02PM -0500, Carey Bunks wrote:
> Glyph wrote:
> > The random-splash-screen idea is a good one, perhaps with a few
> > more of the interim splashes. Let's not include 'Oh, the
> > humanity!' though, okay? :-)
>
> Don't you think, though, that it would b
>> > Glyph, I have to say that my sentiments are just the opposite of
>> > yours. Although the latest splash (with the brush) is nice and
>> > traditional looking, I find it has little identity and little
>> > character. On the other hand I feel that the balloon splash captures
>> > t
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Carey Bunks wrote:
> Glyph, I have to say that my sentiments are just the opposite of
> yours. Although the latest splash (with the brush) is nice and
> traditional looking, I find it has little identity and little
> character. On the other hand I feel that the balloon spl
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:45:50 -0800 (PST), Arcterex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I personally like both the balloon and brush image. Maybe both can
>fit in somewhere? I understand I'm just a lurker here and have no
>real clout, but maybe one can be the splash (I'm thinking balloon)
>and the brush
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> what do others think? I could edit the brush image (Wilber & Sons) to suit
> better for "About" -image, anything you would like to have there?
>
I personally have always liked the 1.1.10 image and it seems to have more
of an "About" feel to it. Of c
I've been checking CVS Gimp with some "real users" lately.
One complaint was that there is no obvious way to rotate the image. Of
course, WE all know it's the transform tool in rotation mode, but it's not
trivial to guess: the tip for the tool just says "Transform".
Do you agree to some modifica
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Expanding the image to 1400x1400 first would fix that. However, I can
> imagine that you might want to wrap an 8000x100 image into a 1000x1000
> circle, but expanding the image to 8000x8000 might be beyond your
> machine's resources.
Yes, and the inpu
Dave;
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 06:31:51PM +0100, David Monniaux wrote:
> I am currently reviewing plug-ins with "real users".
Hooray for real users!
> Some plug-ins apparently and annoyingly lack much needed
> functionality. For instance, the PolarCoord plug-in insists on
> rendering into the s
> >> I gotta say, the newest one is definitely my favorite so far. The baloon
> >> was nice, but this one looks really polished, and professional, but fun at
> >> the same time.
> >>
> >> It is a logo that says "we can take on photoshop, just click and see" ;-)
>
> Glyph, I have to say t
I am currently reviewing plug-ins with "real users".
Some plug-ins apparently and annoyingly lack much needed functionality.
For instance, the PolarCoord plug-in insists on rendering into the same
image as source, with same dimensions.
So, an obvious maneuver like render a ribbon of text (say 14
>> > the baloon, the rocket, or the new one are my faves for 1.2. I really
>> > like the newest one. Nice work.
>> >
>> > Adrian
>>
>> I gotta say, the newest one is definitely my favorite so far. The baloon
>> was nice, but this one looks really polished, and professional, but fu
On Thursday, 13 Jan 2000, David Monniaux wrote:
> #: app/undo.c:2874
> msgid "FS to layer"
> msgstr "FS vers calque"
>
> #. ok
> #: app/undo.c:2875
> msgid "gimage"
> msgstr "gimage"
>
> #: app/undo.c:2876
> msgid "FS rigor"
> msgstr ""
>
> #: app/undo.c:2877
> msgid "FS relax"
> msgstr ""
>
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Adrian Likins wrote:
> the baloon, the rocket, or the new one are my faves for 1.2. I really
> like the newest one. Nice work.
>
> Adrian
I gotta say, the newest one is definitely my favorite so far. The baloon
was nice, but this one looks really polished, and profe
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:29:12PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote:
>
> I just had an idea: the lightbulb image that is used in File/About
> could also be updated because it has not changed much since the early
> days. So what about this: we use the image version 1.14 for the
> splash screen (or 1.1
#: app/undo.c:2874
msgid "FS to layer"
msgstr "FS vers calque"
#. ok
#: app/undo.c:2875
msgid "gimage"
msgstr "gimage"
#: app/undo.c:2876
msgid "FS rigor"
msgstr ""
#: app/undo.c:2877
msgid "FS relax"
msgstr ""
What do these options mean?
General note to programmers: please document the meani
I just had an idea: the lightbulb image that is used in File/About
could also be updated because it has not changed much since the early
days. So what about this: we use the image version 1.14 for the
splash screen (or 1.15 if Tigert can improve it), and the version 1.4
with the baloon for the a
Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:40:02 +1100 (EST), Paul F Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >I have made a plug-in that does some interesting things, like applying
> >a theme taken from one image and applying it to another, or making an
> >image tilable. More details at
>
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, "Garry R. Osgood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latest is very good too, but the bristles are pointing the wrong way
> (they would point *into* the ink blot as the brush pushes to the left).
> I guess this bothers my boring and literal mind.
Good catch! Actually, it is ev
Adrian Likins wrote:
>
>
> the baloon, the rocket, or the new one are my faves for 1.2. I really
> like the newest one. Nice work.
>
> Adrian
>
>
The magical quality of 1.4 is hard to beat. It reminds me of Bilbo Baggins:
"The road goes ever onward..."
The latest is very good too, but
Carey Bunks wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the CVS gimp 1.14 corresponding to the line
2000-01-08 Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
as the top entry in the Changelog, and I'd like to report a bug.
The bug I've discovered is that it is no longer possible to paste from
the default buffer to a channel
Adrian Likins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 03:15:55PM -0800, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:24:09PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> > > I vote for releasing gimp 1.2 with Tigert's 1.4 "floating balloon"
> > > splash screen.
> >
> > I was thinking o
31 matches
Mail list logo