Hi,
The history log is not down, but it moved, to this URL:
http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23semantic-mediawiki/
Hopefully someone can change the URL in the message - it has been incorrect
for years now, which I'm sure has caused a lot of confusion.
I have no strong opinion on the IRC/Gi
Hi Viktor,
Someone may answer your question here, but if not, I would suggest writing
the mediawiki-l mailing list instead, since it seems to just be a core
MediaWiki question.
-Yaron
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Viktor wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
>
> I’m having problems getting the correc
lay of pictures on the timeline,
> which of course is also nice to have.
>
> cheers,
> Bernhard
>
> - Am 4. Okt 2016 um 15:09 schrieb Yaron Koren :
>
> > Hi Bernhard,
> > Could you enumerate what features you would ideally like to see in a
> timeline
> >
Hi Bernhard,
Could you enumerate what features you would ideally like to see in a
timeline format? The Exhibit Timeline library, which is used by SMW (and,
let me note, by Cargo as well), is indeed old and poorly-maintained, but it
still works fine. I'm guessing that you would also prefer the Hist
>> ApprovedRevsHooks::updateLinksAfterEdit
> >>
> >> properly sends empty $text to LinksUpdate, however in
> >>
> >> ApprovedRevsHooks::setSearchText
> >>
> >> it retrieves actual article text by hitting
> >>
> >> $revi
That's certainly not intended behavior. Is the page displaying correctly,
i.e. blank? And can you find by searching on its contents from
Special:Search? (Hopefully not.)
Also, I'd recommend upgrading to the latest Approved Revs version, 0.7.1 -
who knows, that might be a bug that got fixed.
On Fr
Hi,
> for it, but I don't want to scare anyone off this list.)
>
> I'm not sure I understand the connotation of your comment.
I meant that I don't want people in general to worry that their questions
are too technical for this list - especially for SMW-related extensions not
found on GitHub, for
Hi,
James - note that this is the SMW developers mailing list; I don't think
that question is too technical for here. (GitHub might be the better place
for it, but I don't want to scare anyone off this list.)
-Yaron
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:26 AM, James HK
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please open an issue
Seems pretty interesting... I assume this will focus mostly on core
MediaWiki and WMF software like VisualEditor and Flow, but apparently not
exclusively.
-Yaron
-- Forwarded message --
From: Quim Gil
Date: Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:52 AM
Subject: [MediaWiki-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] Joi
Hi Jason,
If you're talking about making a change to the semantic data of a page that
is not reflected in that page's wikitext, that sounds like a bad idea - the
new data would be removed as soon as the page was edited and saved again.
-Yaron
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jason Ji wrote:
>
uot;link text" parameter would certainly help me. And I think it
> is all in all a better solution than to silently ignore the link text
> when a page exists as that is surprising (and made me think it's a bug).
>
> Greetings
> Hermann
>
> On 05/29/2015 05:53 PM, Yar
rn the tables: What's the use case for the way it is right now?
> The information about the existence of the page the link points to is
> already encoded in the colour of the link, isn't it?
>
> Greetings
> Hermann
>
> On 05/29/2015 12:49 AM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
Hi Hermann,
That was done on purpose - the idea was that #formredlink has two different
behaviors, depending on whether or not the page in question exists. If it
doesn't, then of course you see a red link, pointing to a form, with text
that possibly looks like "Create this page". If it does, then
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Markus Krötzsch <
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> On 06.04.2015 03:57, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing that it's possible, yes. I hadn't really considered that
>> possibility, though there certainly is
enabled. Not that that's
necessarily a reason for doing the same thing with Cargo.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:22 PM, John McClure
wrote:
> It would be nice if it only showed on pages for which it applies - is
> that possible?
>
>
> On 4/3/2015 1:20 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
Hi,
Er... no? I didn't think it was a big deal; it's an exact analogue of SMW's
"browse properties" link.
-Yaron
Is it necessary that Cargo clutter all pages in a wiki with a "page
values" link?
--
thanks/john
skype:hypergrove
---
they're unconventional.)
> So a simple {{#cargo_declare: tablename}} would seem to be an easy
> solution.
> thanks/john
>
>
> On 3/31/2015 12:46 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
> Actually, #cargo_declare follows the standard syntax for MediaWiki parser
> functions - usuall
Actually, #cargo_declare follows the standard syntax for MediaWiki parser
functions - usually, either all the parameters are named, or none of them
are. #ask is an exception, and #subobject is the very rare exception where
the first parameter is often blank (i.e., your last example).
-Yaron
On Tu
> If any, that is it doesn't matter which, then is this constraint you're
> imposing actually necessary?
> thanks
>
> On 3/31/2015 11:00 AM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
> Oh, I missed your other question - Cargo is built around templates; they
> are responsible for stor
Oh, I missed your other question - Cargo is built around templates; they
are responsible for storing data, so it made sense to put both the table
declaration and the table storage go into the template page.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> How does th
Hi John,
How does the absence of the main MediaWiki DB prefix affect the running of
the wiki farm - are you using one database for all the wikis, with a
different table prefix for each?
And why do you want leading underscores in Cargo table names?
-Yaron
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:17 PM, John Mc
; First I tried the "suggested" way using {{{standard input|cancel}}} but
> when I inserted it to the form, it did not make any changes, neither the
> {{{standard input|changes}}} . Do I need to change other things on the
> form to make it work? Or I completely misunderstand some
Hi Erika,
When you use "link type=button", it creates a tag within the HTML,
and I'm guessing that it in some way conflicts with the overall tag
of the query form.
I don't know why you're linking to a query form from within a query form,
but I guess that's a separate issue.
-Yaron
On Thu, Mar
Hi Bernhard,
Assuming that there's a standard naming system to this set of pages, i.e.
it's always "[number] [other stuff]", one possibility is to have the
template use #explode to get the number, then store that separately with a
property of type "Number". Then you could sort on that property.
-
Hi John,
I'm not going to answer the use case question, since I'm not sure that any
good can come of answering it. :) If you want to provide your own answer to
the question, that's fine.
As for Wikibase, there's no shared code between Cargo between Wikibase; and
there's no relationship between th
Hi Bernhard,
Wow, that's pretty neat! It appears that this is using a JavaScript library
called Keshif, which in turn uses D3.js:
http://keshif.me/
And the guy whose instance you linked to seems to be one of the people
behind the project.
Any thoughts by anyone on this interface versus that of
t; load.php, jQuery.valHooks.button.set, referring to ret.nodeValue being
> null and on the left side of an assignment.
>
> Sal
> --
> From: Yaron Koren
> Sent: 11/13/2014 10:45 AM
> To: Sal Quintanilla
> Cc: Semantic MediaWiki developers
>
Hi Sal,
When the "Add another" button works, it's usually a sign that there's some
other, unrelated Javascript error that happened. Can you look in the
Javascript console, if you know how to do that, and see if there are any
error messages there?
-Yaron
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Sal Quin
Hi,
There's actually not that much overlap between smw.referata.com and
semantic-mediawiki.org at the moment. smw.referata.com contains pages on
the following:
- People who use or develop SMW
- Companies that use or work with SMW
- Sites that use SMW
- Events that have an SMW component
- Software
Hi,
Just to clarify, this is not related to the TreeAndMenu extension, which is
not installed on Referata. Rather, the issue is that there was a change in
the Semantic Forms code around (I think) six months ago, that changed the
way forms were parsed - it improved some things, but had the unfortun
gt;
> In case this solves the issue, I sincerely hope there is a different
> way (a more standard way) to reset the "job_attempts" field other than
> by using a SQL statement to manipulate the job table.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 9/25/14, Yaron Koren wrote:
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
I believe the issue is the "job_attempts" field in the "job" table. I
believe each job is only attempted a certain number of times before
MediaWiki basically just gives up and ignores it. My guess is that that
column is greater than 0 for all the rows in the table; I think if you just
go into
t; Hi!
> This part I know. But I meant the javascript side - how the current value
> is loaded there? Is there a method that allows me to retrieve the current
> template field value whil I'm in js?
>
> -
> Yury Katkov
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Yaron Kore
> Yury Katkov
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
>> Hi Yury,
>>
>> Oh... that's a lot of files! Yes, that kind of autocomplatetion might
>> require some kind of custom Javascript solution. Although, if the goal is
>>
the
> semantic form when we put some data in the form and sending the ajax call
> to an api with our current field values as the parameters.
>
> for now I will try to solve this with javascript extension that listens
> the blur() action and the REST-API that is responsible for de
Hi Yury,
(First, it doesn't matter that much, but this question should probably have
been sent to the SMW users list.)
You didn't explicitly say it, but I'm guessing that (a) the set of file
names to be autocompleted on is all the files contained in that file
server, and (b) this information is n
ic and I'm
> totally satisfied.
>
> -
> Yury Katkov
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
>> Oops, sorry, you're right - it's the string "new" in the URL that you
>> should replace with "".
>>
t be the issue.
>
> I don't think I should... I don't need any parameters, try to click on the
> link - it produces perfect results.
>
> -
> Yury Katkov
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
>> Hi Yury,
>>
>> Yo
Hi Yury,
You should replace "substr" in that URL with "" - that might just
be the issue.
However, I should note that we're currently, as part of Jatin Mehta's
Google Summer of Code project on SF autocompletion, working on improving
autocompletion on external values. Right now the setup is quite l
Hi James,
> I'm not a huge fan of such interdependencies (and AdminLinks is no
exception).
This seems like the most overriding of your objections. Could you elaborate
on it?
--
Want fast and easy access to all the code in
Hi,
Well, it depends on what you mean by "broken". From my perspective, as long
as the code doesn't crash SMW's regular functionality, it's good enough. If
there's a problem with the Site Settings functionality in SMW - even a
severe problem - you could just redirect it as a Site Settings issue, w
Hi Jeroen,
Unfortunately, there isn't yet a public example of an extension that hooks
into Site Settings - if this potential code gets into SMW, SMW could become
the first. But the basic idea is that the class would contain various
static methods, each of which was called by a different Site Setti
wrote:
> On 7/15/2014 7:25 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
> Semantic MediaWiki already hooks into the first two: Admin Links via a
> function, and Page Schemas with a class.
>
>
> Hi Yaron - What function/class are those. Also, i happened to review PS
> ext
a regular
basis - but that of course is a matter of opinion. Like with any software,
there's always room for improvement.
-Yaron
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Yury Katkov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
>> Hi Yury,
&g
Hi Yury,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Yury Katkov wrote:
> Hi Yaron!
>
> I think that for SiteSettings this patch could make sense although I'm
> strongly against such interdependencies between extensions (after trying to
> contribute to PageSchemas)
>
Could you expand on that?
>
> Is Adm
Hi,
There are three extensions of mine that take a similar approach, where they
provide a generic framework and other extensions add their own specific
functionality in via hooks: Admin Links, Page Schemas and Site Settings.
Semantic MediaWiki already hooks into the first two: Admin Links via a
fu
I can
> think of. At some point, SemanticMediaWiki should put semantics INTO
> mediawiki, not just extract semantic properties from mediawiki pages. We
> seem prevented though by a common distaste to modify mediawiki core and
> hence, paralyzed.
>
> best/john
>
> On 7/
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Peter Brooks
wrote:
> I'm trying to think about this in a more semantic way.
>
> Surely, part of the point of semantics is to allow rules to be governed by
> them.
>
> If I could create a property, say '[[page_visibility::group_X]]' then
> it would make
Hi Ben,
It's not clear to me that this would require any development work. It seems
to me that you could have an approach like the following:
- Have a separate page for each vote; it could be structured as a subpage
of the user page, or a subpage of the canyon page, or something else - so
it coul
ds a few tweak, for example ability to
> work with different namespaces.
>
> On the more trivial end is the need to add or edit a few more
> properties, templates and forms to the wiki.
>
> There also improvements needed to the development/deployment process -
> we are running d
Hi Lech,
Since we're already on the subject, would you be willing to share what kind
of customizations you'd like to do? It may be helpful for you, and for
everyone else, to discuss your ideas here before getting heavily into code
development. As noted in the SMW FAQ [1], "it could be that such a
Hi,
I agree that SMW probably couldn't be used by itself for this, and that
Semantic Forms makes more sense. Thankfully, though, I don't need to create
a proof of concept for this opinion, because one already exists. :) In
2011, Christoph Tempich created this demo, showing how Semantic Forms - and
Hi everyone,
The Google Summer of Code process has already begun. SMW projects will once
again be done via the Wikimedia Foundation (that is, we're not trying to
apply separately, unlike in some previous years). This year the GSoC
schedule is earlier than I think it's ever been - the list of accep
tch is needed to turn off
> composer so that wikifarm code can load extensions in the conventional way.
> If I missed something, please correct! Thanks/john
>
> On 1/27/2014 6:45 AM, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There was a thread about a week ago on the semediawiki-user
Hi,
There was a thread about a week ago on the semediawiki-user mailing list,
called "Howto install SMW using git?", that became a discussion about a
number of things, including why there should be a way to disable extensions
installed via Composer. I suggested using one or more global variables f
.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticMediaWiki/blob/master/includes/hooks/LinksUpdateConstructed.php
>
> Cheers
>
> On 1/20/14, Yaron Koren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Approved Revs extension no longer seems to work with Semantic
> MediaWiki
> > 1.9 - someone pointed
Hi,
The Approved Revs extension no longer seems to work with Semantic MediaWiki
1.9 - someone pointed that out on the mailing list a few months ago, and I
finally tested it out and confirmed the problem. Basically, when an
administrator, using AR, approves some revision of a page, the AR code
call
Hi,
Markus - are you suggesting retroactively referring to, say, version 1.5.1
as version 5.1 - with a corresponding change to all the documentation,
etc.? Or just jumping straight from version 1.9 to version 10.0? I'm
assuming the latter, but in either case that seems like a bad idea, that
will i
Hi,
It sounds like your real question is, "Shouldn't we have changed to 2.0
already?" :) I don't know the answer to that, but I can't imagine anyone
would object to increasing the version number to 2.0, 3.0 etc. if/when it
makes sense to do that.
(I don't think avoiding a 1.10, 1.11 etc. is by it
umber of fields
> whose value can be passed on submission. But so far, I haven’t been able
> to find the setting that could help me change that limit. If you’ve got
> any more hints you can suggest on what I should be looking for, I’d
> appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Thanks. Happ
Hi Sal,
A few variations on this question have come up on the mailing lists
recently. SF itself doesn't impose any limits - but PHP and/or Javascript
have their own natural limits, PHP by limiting the number of fields whose
value can be passed when the form is submitted, and Javascript by slowing
you -
> > I don't yet see the usecase where it would be useful to have
> > semantified inline comments. Or any comments and discussions, for
> > that matter.
> >
> >
> > -
> > Yury Katkov, WikiVote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> &
Hi Bernhard,
This seems like a case of the "when you have a hammer, everything looks
like a nail" principle. :) If the extension used - whether it's Annotator
or anything else - is keeping annotation information, it's presumably using
one or more of its own database tables to do that. And so the m
Hi Benedikt,
It could be that there's some wording confusion: by "offline", did you
really just mean "private"? It sounds like what you're talking about is
people submitting data, via the internet/web, that then gets put into an
external server - only one that requires a password to access; as opp
Hi Benjamin,
I, too, have experienced this problem, on a wiki that uses Semantic Maps
2.0. However, it doesn't happen on semantic-mediawiki.org, which is running
Semantic Maps 3.0 alpha. Thus, I assume the bug has been fixed already
(although on a version that hasn't yet been officially released).
Hi Benedikt,
I've definitely thought about offline form and data stuff, but I don't
quite understand your use case:
- Would the offline form be just a copy of an online form? If so, doesn't
that mean that sensitive patient data *can* get put on the wiki?
- If a physician stores data offline, can
{{#ask:
> [[Category:Event]]
> |?has Event
> |?Has Category
> |format=calendar
> |color=red
> }}
>
> Still nothing displays on the calendar.
>
>
> And my info line to this
>
> {{{info|page name= number;start=001> }}}
>
> This works.
>
{#ask:
> [[Category:Event]]
> [[Was published on::>{{#calendarstartdate:}}]]
> [[Was published on::<{{#calendarenddate:}}]]
> |? Was published on
> |format=calendar
> |color=red
> }}
>
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Wade
>
>
> From:
Hi Wade,
That doesn't sound like a calendar question, actually. :) I think the issue
is that, if you're using #formlink and not #forminput, you need to set a
"page name" formula for the form:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/Linking_to_forms#The_one-step_process
-Yaron
O
changes on my wiki and look
> forward to finding out whether the subsection fix would be easy. If it
> isn't, I'll see if I can dig in to changing it myself. Does SF have a bug
> reporting system for me to list this bug in?
>
> Thanks once more for all the responses!
>
hand, wouldn't it be possible
> to sanitize and desanitize the content? Or do extensions dynamically
> generate wiki code rather than HTML code? (I'm not familiar with
> MediaWiki's architecture)
>
> Thanks again!
> --Ben
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Y
Hi Ben,
Wow, great! I believe this is the first real-world usage that I've seen of
the new "section" feature in Semantic Forms. (It was added in version 2.6,
about a month ago.) Unfortunately, it's accompanied by the first-ever bug
report. :) Your diagnosis is correct - the subsections within that
Hi John,
I just wanted to respond to one part:
> Surely you're aware the community so highly esteems your
> contributions to OWL specifications, that it has a directly consequent,
> unflinching & justifiable belief that SMW is a /faithful RDF
> implementation/.
I don't believe this is true. T
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Yury Katkov wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> The first day of the conference is online! You can watch the videos
> and slides for every one of the talks.
>
>
That's great! The videos look good.
>
> I especially recommend you to watch the following talks:
> 1) If y
I meant "why bother" instead of "why both" before, by the way.
--
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hostin
Hi,
Before we get too deep into the technical side of things, let me take a
step back:
Ajax, for those who don't know, is a technology where parts of the page can
be modified, based on new data from the server, without needing to refresh
the whole page. As far as I know, there are two advantages
Hi John,
MediaWiki is a CMS, and so is MW + SMW - first and foremost, it's a way to
manage content.
Also, please keep the discussion civil - even if you think someone's being
uncivil to you, the best approach is to de-escalate and focus on the issues.
-Yaron
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jo
le for this.
>
> What's more, they just closed the SMW Stockholm group, by unspecifically
> referring to http://help.meetup.com/customer/portal/articles/865536 :(
>
> // Samuel
>
>
> On 2013-11-06 17:03, Yaron Koren wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
Hi,
I'm not aware of meetup.com being used for conferences and the like.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Yury Katkov wrote:
> And the other question: we've thought to use Meetup.com for getting
> more people for the conference. Is the tool good for this, can guys
> from SMWCon Spring 2014 use
Hi Andru,
Since you mentioned Semantic Forms - I have no plans to move over, or copy,
SF or any of my other extensions to GitHub, unless it first happens for SMW
and/or other extensions and there's a widespread consensus that it's the
right thing to do. I'm what you might call a "late adopter" as
Hi everyone,
If you don't know about "Google Code-In", it's a spinoff project of the
Google Summer of Code, where high school students (instead of college
students) work on a bunch of small several-hour tasks (instead of one large
project). The Wikimedia Foundation applied to be a mentoring organi
Hi,
Well, you make a strong case. And no, I think doing a result format makes a
lot of sense. Good luck!
-Yaron
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> The point of this workshop is not to teach people SMW interfaces. The
> amount of ground that can be covered in a o
Well, yes, that's what I meant - though I guess it depends on (a) how
likely this new code is to stay in SMW in its current form, (b) when it
would be released as part of a stable version, and (c) how different this
new interface is from the current one. But my vote would still be to teach
the old
Hi,
It's great that you're working to improve the code, but isn't it weird to
teach people how to use an interface that doesn't exist yet? If they go to
create a new result format after the tutorial, won't their newfound
knowledge be (for the moment) useless?
-Yaron
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:30
Hi Samuel,
Sorry that I'm not answering any of your questions, but I wanted to clarify
something. My understanding of RDFIO is as follows: it takes in triples
that might look like:
"Joe Average" foaf:phone 123-4567
For such a triple, it would then find the page on the wiki called "Joe
Average",
Hi Samuel,
Perhaps a bit of background information would be helpful. What does RDFIO
do? What, if anything, do you want it do further? What did SMWWriter do?
How do POM/WOM fit into this whole thing? And how does this relate to the
RDF triplestore functionality that SMW now has?
-Yaron
On Mon,
Hi Vitaliy,
I'm not a core SMW developer, so there's not much I can do on this issue;
but maybe there are some SMW developers reading this, who can at least
express an opinion on the subject. Anyone?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> I agree with you here. I don't think backwards compat
Hi Vitaliy,
I agree with you here. I don't think backwards compatibility is a
compelling reason to keep the property-name-dictates-type feature. I don't
believe there are that many wikis that have such a property defined without
an associated type - and conversely, we know of a few wikis where thi
Hi James,
That function checks, for every red link on the page, whether there's a
property somewhere on the wiki pointing to that page, that has a form
associated with it - and if there is, setBrokenLink() changes the URL of
that red link to look like "Special:FormEdit/form-name/page-name" - so th
Hi,
It's been quite a while since I looked into the red-link handling, and I
don't remember what the difference is between the queries (they both call
SMW code to do the actual querying), but from what I recall it was a pretty
significant performance difference.
It would be easy to add a setting
Hi Bernhard,
You've uncovered a bug in SF (it's not related at all to SIO) - the
presence of "-Adressen.Bezirk" (specifically, the first "-") is messing up
the process of associating template fields with properties.
There's an easy fix, although unfortunately for some reason there's an
issue righ
Hi Yury,
There are, of course, a number of existing faceted search solutions that
don't require any patches:
- The Semantic Drilldown extension
- The Special:RunQuery page of Semantic Forms
- The "filtered" result format in Semantic Result Formats (I'm assuming it
still works, though I don't know
Hi,
I didn't know whether you were serious about splitting off the SMW PS class
into its own extension, but clearly you are - and you might want other
functionality split off as well, like maybe an #info tag extension. I don't
know whether it's worth having a full discussion about the philosophy o
ssage( 'smw-createproperty-isproperty', $typeTag
> )->inContentLanguage()->text();
>
> [3] PageSchemas::getValueFromObject( $prop_array, 'name' );
>
> [4] PageSchemas::getValueFromObject( $prop_array, 'Type' );
> $allowedValues = PageSchemas::getVal
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Wow... I don't know if there's ever been such quick consensus on a topic
> on this list.
>
> Yes, you have won of badge of some sorts :)
>
>
> > I'm not even sure what a "global plan" is. :)
>
> Ah, of course you would deny yo
Wow... I don't know if there's ever been such quick consensus on a topic on
this list. Evidently that Page Schemas class has been bugging people for a
long time. :)
Yury wrote:
> I remember Yaron have explained that it's a legacy remained from some
kind of global
> plan of making PageSchemas the
Hi Ryan,
What do you mean by "SMW friendly"?
-Yaron
On Jun 28, 2013 1:07 PM, "Ryan Glasnapp" wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a SMW friendly version of the HotCat gadget?
>
> Thanks!
> --Ryan
>
>
> --
> This SF.net email is
And it
somewhat fits in with the different philosophies of SMW/subobjects vs. SIO:
in SMW, such objects can have their own name and identity, while in SIO,
they're really only attributes of the page on which they're defined.
-Yaron
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Stephan Gambke wrote:
&g
s stored with the
> subject, but without modifying it. Storing the index number of a statement
> the way you propose, _would_ modify the statement. So, nothing broken with
> the Modification date, with that index, though...
>
> Cheers,
> Stephan
>
> On Jun 20, 2013 7:02 PM, "
ccurrence will be dropped and not appear in any query results. I am not
> sure if this is also true for subjects, but it really should be.
>
> So, long story short: If your data model for project management does not
> explicitly contain the sequence number for the activities, then your
1 - 100 of 531 matches
Mail list logo
