On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 03:36:52PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:42:48 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Memory usage on both?
>
> Roughly the same at ~150Mb (javaw process)
>
> Knock down the xferrate a bit from 11kb/s, it dropped
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:36:01PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think some will find this interesting.
>
> I've run Freenet on a Duron 900 with 512Mb ram, Windows 2000, for quite
> some time. The javaw process has consumed all available CPU, and the
> computer has been quite s
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:04:45AM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
> Came home tonight to find that my node had crashed earlier on. Now after
> restarting I'm seeing millions (literally) of this message in the logfile:
This definitely should not happen, it means your node is using the
pre-multiplexin
Please read my other mail on this subject before passing judgement -
what I am working on at the moment may actually have some bearing on
this.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:15:22AM +, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:19:28PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> > Hi Toad,
> >
>
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:21:13PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> And how many browsers do that? Sure, I'm not sure about writing a
> plugin, since most of the time they can only add processing for
> different MIME types, whereas a different browser using a freenet://
> protocol could connect
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:28:27PM +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
>
> On 29/01/2004, at 10:13 PM, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
>
> >Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
> >>>Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of
> >>>whack.
> >>>In fact that sound
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Maximilian Mehnert wrote:
> Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28:
> > > Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack.
> > > In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration
> > > file set
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:56:42AM -0600, S wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:33:42 +0100
> Maximilian Mehnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Freenet is one of the most beautiful ideas I ever hit on.
> > But it should be possible to run it on a small pentium machine with no
> > more than 100MB of
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:19:28PM +0100, Alban Bedel wrote:
> Hi Toad,
>
> on Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:37:46 + you wrote:
>
> Before i start i must say i always like the idea of freenet. I tried
> it a couple time long ago but i never had enouth disk space to devote.
> I tri
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 10:37:16PM +, Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Niklas Bergh wrote:
>
> > > It is noticeable that Freenet uses a ridiculous amount of RAM. If I run
> > > top on a node that connects to only one other node, and sporadically at
> > > that, I see that it is using 79
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:00:36PM +, Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
>
> > > Freeing up RAM is not related to routing table at all. Unfortunately,
> > > Freenet code contains a bug (a so called "memory leak") which takes
> > > memory from your OS, but then "forg
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:32:36AM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:21:14PM -0800, Steven wrote:
> > since multiplexing has been ported to the stable branch of freenet, we can
> > have a MUCH lower maxConnection setting right? I used allow 300, now I only
> > allow 2
Freenet stable build 5069 is now available. The snapshots will have been
updated sometime in the next few minutes; if you don't get 5069, try
again in an hour's time. If it's still 5068, complain to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can get it via the update.sh script on
Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freene
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 09:34:06AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> > Is it a VM bug or is it just creating
> > objects it theoretically could reach (thus they don't get GC'd), but
> > ignores forever?
>
> The second it what is defined as a 'memory leak' in GC'd environments.
Or a "space leak".
>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 06:48:49PM -0800, Steven wrote:
>
> Gentoo linux kernel 2.6.2-mmsources
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: number of connections
> Date: Saturday 24 January 2004 23:21
> From: Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> since multiplexing
Will be fixed in a near future build.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:04:40AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> I am getting them on windows XP with 1.4.2_03 too...
>
> /N
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nomen Nescio
> > Sent: den 11
Operating system?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 06:31:46PM -0800, Steven wrote:
> Niklaus: You insist that If I have a low maximum connections setting, my node
> will have to make more connections, and therefore my node will overload.
> However, if I let my max connects get past 90 or so, it gets ov
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:30:26PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I hope this is the right place for these questions.
>
> Windows XP.
>
> I just updated to 5068 (stable) and got the new node references. After
> running, apparently without problems, for a while, Freenet encountered
> problem
Freenet stable build 5068 is now available. Upgrade using
freenet-webinstall.exe or update.sh , or download the jar from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All users of
the stable network/branch should upgrade immediately.
This fixes a major bug in 5067 and a minor one, one t
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:04:34AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
> I have tried time and time again to get freenet running only to be met with
> one frustration after another.
>
> The last version of freenet that worked and actually allowed me to retrieve
> freesites and frost content was build 5017.
>
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:57:00AM +0100, privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 04:20:05AM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > Running build 6468 on Linux 2.6.2 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 VM,
> > I get lots of temp-*-1-* files in store/temp which don't go
> > away after being c
Freenet stable build 5066 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Freenet unstable build 6463 is now available. The snapshots will have
been updated in the next few minutes. The main change in this build is
to fix the per-node links on the routing table page. This should help us
understand what is going on with routing.
PS I *STRONGLY* recommend ANYONE running u
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious
> >causes first especially as others say it's not that bad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:16:21PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:01:36 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Are there any incoming connections? Go to the web interface, click on
> >Advanced mode if necessary, and click on Open Connections. If
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:06:46PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> > Toad,
> >
> > Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost
> > to a halt with similar symptoms. A very
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> Hi!
> I've downoloaded freenet some days ago. I istalled it on two machines:
> one is running Windows XP, the other is running Linux Mandrake 9.2.
> I've encountered some problems in both the installations.
> In Windows XP i've correctly i
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> It is an effect of a connection being closed quite immediately after it
> was opened. Could we move the enqueueing of the identify message a
> little while later?
No. Identify has to be the first message sent. It's logged at NORMAL
be
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 11:59:57AM -0500, Stefano Santoro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please take me off immediately from your subscription service.
> Consider this february donation the last one. This means I
> have donated to you 60 dollars so far, when I really meant
> donating only 20. I would consider a
Bandwidth?
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
> No.
>
> Nikita.
>
> Toad wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I run freenet on Windows from command line and JR
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
> I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at
> 64MB. And FreeNet still works great. When I look at memory used in the
> Environment on the gateway, it doesn't even use all of 64MB. I have
> 256MB tot
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Toad wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >
> >>Toad wrote:
> >>
> >>>2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> >>>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Toad wrote:
> >2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
> >This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
> >CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we&#
Freenet stable build 5065 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Two things:
1. Does anyone know where the scripts used for the old watchme server
are?
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or
Freenet stable build 5064 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:30:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Current seednodes.ref is 5.6Mb, filled with
> this kind of lines
>
> Estimator.erTransferSuccess.Store.7.Key=69888e24fa0323034be788eac1b82cf1dab6c6b4701f40
> Estimator.erTransferSuccess.Store.7.Time=dd4
>
> I crash my stable no
> -s
>
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:41:51 +
> Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You mean from the web interface?
> > http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html - as it always
> > has been.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:13:
M soon, as it's got
> a 256MB limit.)
> CPU still ~20%
> Total amount of data transmitted/received 1,961 MiB/2,506 MiB
>
> Kevin.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
> Sent: 22 January 2004 01:4
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 07:43:41PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Since you announced the last stable release I have been unable to download
> a new release.
>
> Background: For about a month I have gotten sporadic replacement of URLs
> by Internet Explorer by the following:
>
> http://www.marsf
k these were all, without exception, <0.01.
>
> inboundConnectionRatio is ~85%.
>
> routingTime is ~17ms.
>
> outputBytesTrailerChunks/outputBytes=0.58
>
> Once again: nice job guys :)
>
> Kevin.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I very much doubt it. I suppose it might have something to do with the
wininstaller.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:41:18PM -0600, Robert Greenage wrote:
>
>
> Do any of these file names relate in any way to freenet ? I have
> found them in my
> C:\Windows\Temp folder
>
>
Nothing important. IT means your node is pretty severely CPU overloaded,
probably. It will be a lower visibility in future builds.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:57:26PM +0100, Arne Teichmann wrote:
> Just saw that in my log, what does it mean?
>
>
> Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 10 in queue, 2
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 07:20:20PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 17:40, Toad wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:27:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Insertion on unstable are more or less working; it start working
> > > again one
You mean from the web interface?
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html - as it always
has been.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:13:26PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> where is the routing table in 5063?
>
> with regards,
> Max Moritz Sievers
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTE
overall lenght.
>
> Insertion on stable are almost impossible since october; I had
> just one success, but the site was irretrievable.
>
> Toad pointed that poor performance can depend from the small size
> of unstable; I'm interested in know more about this statement.
>
> I had ex
What happens when you try to insert? The usual very very very long
verification times?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:09:54AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
> Limerick ;-)
>
> I would like to put it on my Freesite 'Newsbyte's Flimsy Flog' too, but, alas... :-)
>
>
>
> There once was a new Freenet node,
That's odd, there's no obvious reason it should use much CPU, and the
previous builds didn't generally... what's your bandwidth?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:39:26PM +0100, Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> I have been using unstable for some time but for some time by system
> don't work any
Sorry, I announced this slightly prematurely. The snapshots have been
updated now.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:55:34PM +, Toad wrote:
> Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. The snapshots have been
> updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
> th
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Freenet stable build 5062 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:07:47PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 1/20/2004 2:47:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] New with this ... please some help
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > >I
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:35:00AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
> > I would suggest the project leader Ian Clarke,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] He will most likely read your mail very soon.
> > :)
>
> It seems this email adress is invalid.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct address.
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL P
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:51:32AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> After more experiments with the node it seems like it needs way
> more memory than I can give it. I stopped all other services running
> on the machine and give fred the whole 192 MB that were not needed
> by windows. With this it managed t
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:33:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I found a doc about freenet and have been these last days trying
> to connect. The program installed without any problem. I installed the
> version who comes with Java. After some minute
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:16:33AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> Anyone else seeing a decline in the number of contactable nodes in the
> routing table?
>
> My node seems to be dropping the most backed-off entries (CP=0.0), but
> retaining the entries which can't be contacted (CP=1.0).
Wrong way ar
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
>
> > I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying
> > and
> > then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my
> > node
> > updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:31:26PM +, Russell Hedger wrote:
> I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and
> then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node
> updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more ofte
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:08:30PM -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2004 at 5:24, S wrote:
>
> > Anyone can change the "latest build number" by editing Version.java and
> > compiling the source on their machine. If you were so inclined, you
> > could change your "latest build number" to 9
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:39:55AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Yet a couple...
>
> Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 621 (576/45/956)
> Number of distinct nodes connected 507
Okay, so it's definitely not that the network is that small - either
it's a limited-horizons problem, or more l
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 03:22:53AM -0600, S wrote:
> Has anyone been able to connect to significantly more than 350 distinct
> nodes on Stable?
>
> Ever since muxing and its reduced connection overhead made it into
> Stable, I've noticed a pattern with my node's connections. It'll peak
> somewhere
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:50:55AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> This puzzles me. The win installer has worked without a hitch (except to
> ask you to shut down freenet) as long as I've used it. The only difference
> I've seen recently is twice (not always) reporting a failure to complete a
> do
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:17:14PM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> I think anyone who regularly browses Freenet is going to destroy their
> node's specialisation. Not really a big problem since it means popular
> content is available from more places in the network. Also, recent
> changes (in 5061) to
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Someone wrote:
> Herve Lefebvre schrieb:
>
> >
> >Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows.
>
> Well maybe there will be one in the future.
>
> >But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
>
> > Niklas Bergh schrieb:
> >
> >> Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1
> >> one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can
> >> download it.
> >
> > Seems to be only 1.3.1
> > h
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:27:46PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but
> > it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log,
>
> What kind of errors ?
>
> > high CPU
> > and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Someone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but
> it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU
> and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading
What CPU do you have? How muc
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:59:37AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> Does a node send any kind of error when it receives Unrecognized
> trailers? I'm seeing many of these messages (see below), even after the
> node has been running an hour.
This happens on startup mostly, because of trailers that were
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:35:03AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> Some observations from my 5061 node, ocmContents page (and the resulting
> questions to enhance my understanding of what's going on.) :
>
> Established node, restarted and run for 2 hrs:
> Total amount of messages transfered
> Type
> S
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:30:53AM -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> You may remember me as the one who had problems with fproxy that
> proved to be brain-dead IE defaults. Turns out fproxy and my node are
> working fine, and the node gets around 1 request a second suggesting
> it's integrating wa
Thank you.
The actual version of the software was 0.4. We are way behind 1.0, let
alone 4.0.
The current officially released version is 0.5.2, which you can get from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.tar.gz (for *nix), or
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.src.t
Freenet stable build 5061 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Freenet stable build 5060 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:34AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> Toad schrieb:
>
> >On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> >
> >>I am getting some of these:
> >>
> >>Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
> >&g
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> I am getting some of these:
>
> Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it provide a stack trace?
>
> Got a trailer chunk ahead of our time!: message starts 6880, stream
> currently at 0 from
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:43:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h=
> >as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable->stable or the ot=
> >her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20
> >>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:31:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> why not have some sanity checks when importing seed files or adding node =
> >refs to the routing table? we'll all be luckier with this and in the long r=
> >un the generated seednode files are much less polluted (why aren't=20
round to it...
>
> *scratches head* i see no sense in the current noderef politics.
>
> >I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not
> >at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts).
> >
> >
> >> [Ori
gt; they filtered after retrieving and combining for the official seednodes ?!?)
>
> *scratches head* i see no sense in the current noderef politics.
>
> >I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not
> >at all sure those node are all stable (
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:32:38PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
> I see on the web interface page:
>
> Build: 5058 (Latest: 5060)
>
> freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar still has the same timestamp
> as when 5058 came out (13-Jan-2004 18:20)
>
> I don't see any 5060 nodes in the OCM
, 2004 at 08:08:07PM +, Toad wrote:
> We need more sources of seednodes for the new stable branch. Please mail
> me with the URL to fetch seednodes from. It must be accessible from
> dodo.freenetproject.org (by IP), but it need not be visible to the rest
> of the internet. You ca
We need more sources of seednodes for the new stable branch. Please mail
me with the URL to fetch seednodes from. It must be accessible from
dodo.freenetproject.org (by IP), but it need not be visible to the rest
of the internet. You can do this by setting:
mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,212.13.
Just download the one with the JVM...
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:42:27AM -0800, Bill Haley wrote:
> Hello, I would like to download and run freenet
> software but I'm given the option of dl'ing the
> software with or without Java 1.4.1.
>
> How can I determine what version of Java I am
> currentl
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:27:01AM -0600, S wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:24:17 +
> Kevin Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
> > think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
>
> I concur. As far as I'
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:24:17AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
> think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
>
> Everyone involved should give themselves a pat on the back and take a
> moment to celebrate - the
I don't know. I don't personally vouch for every last bit of code...
Many others contribute to the code.. We cannot establish very much trust
in it anyhow, something might have gone into CVS without a CVS mail
being generated, the CVS-mail generated might not have been noticed yet,
or the change ma
Freenet stable build 5058 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Freenet stable build 5057 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:10:03PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Running build 5055 on Linux 2.6.1 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 and Y threads.
> Just completed a Fuqid download but FEC decoding failed with this trace:
Fixed in 5056.
>
> 13.01.2004 22:10:44 (freenet.node.Node, YThread-75, ERROR): Error
Freenet stable build 5055 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:48:07PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
> Yippee! I've been using this for a only a couple of hours and the
> improvement is *very* noticeable :-) More freesites load, faster and at
> lower htl's than they have done for many months.
Probably just because the network is sma
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:30:07AM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:00:16 +0000, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The main change in this build is that multiplexing has been merged after
> >weeks of development and testing. The network has been re
Freenet stable build 5055 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users s
Stable build 5054 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
Download it from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar
or use freenet-webinstall.exe or update.sh to upgrade. Source is also
available at
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-stable-latest.src.tar.bz2 .
Th
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:04:17PM +, Andrew Dickson wrote:
> Let's face it, freenet was working brilliantly this
> time last year... Content was slow, but it was
> accessible. At the moment freenet is dead in the
> water.
The unstable network on the other hand is working pretty well. We shoul
Administrative note: in future announcements of unstable builds will
only go to the devl and tech lists, please subscribe to one of those
lists if you run unstable.
Freenet unstable build 6433 is now available.
Changelog:
* Fixed a major bug that was causing connections to be incapable of
rece
Freenet unstable build 6432 is now available from CVS and the snapshots
should be updated by the time you read this. The major change is the
reinstatement of bandwidth limiting, in order to try to eliminate it as
a major cause of network brokenness. This may well lead to a significant
degradation i
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:15AM +, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > --- Roger Hayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
> > > popular bo
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- Roger Hayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
> > popular boards seem
> > almost all to be retrievable both from the "stable"
> > and the "unstable"
> > network? ... doesn
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen
> Mollett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Hi,
> >
> >--- Roger Hayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
> >>popular boards seem
> >>almost all to be ret
701 - 800 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
