Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Saturday 9 November 2013 at 5:39:32 PM, in , Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > The only times I can recall having a message land in > the wrong folder is when the sender changed something, > which had been static, upon which I had been filtering. > An examination of the filter and the errant messa

Re[2]: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

mplete." There are M>> "Close" and "Help" buttons. > As you can see, your "Test filters" box and mine differ. The "box within the > box" > contains a single long line which describes what actions were taken with this > message as follows: &g

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

gt; long line which describes what actions were taken with >> this message as follows: >> Message from MFPA, subject "Re: Feature request? >> Messages display filtering used.", size 6,368 bytes >> filtered (processed by "Processed by: Faux inbox. >> Acti

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

s: > Message from MFPA, subject "Re: Feature request? > Messages display filtering used.", size 6,368 bytes > filtered (processed by "Processed by: Faux inbox. > Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S. > LaRosa\Faux inbox", "Processed by: TBUDL List

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

can see, your "Test filters" box and mine differ. The "box within the box" contains a single long line which describes what actions were taken with this message as follows: Message from MFPA, subject "Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.", size 6,36

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Friday 8 November 2013 at 10:33:31 PM, in , Chris Wilson wrote: > I was expecting > something that showed the filter, or filters, used to > move or copy it there. I maintain this would be a very > useful feature, hope I haven't misunderstood the "Test > Filters" option, but I believe it d

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Friday 8 November 2013 at 5:30:39 PM, in , Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions and > right-click on your message (running a later version of > TB! than yours), then click "Test Filters" this is what > I get: > http://clip2net.com/s/68hktS Mine is just the

Re[2]: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

> Hello Chris, >> I see the same, which is not really telling me how a message was >> routed to that folder. I was expecting something that showed the >> filter, or filters, used to move or copy it there. > Have you ever taken a look at the Account's log? If not, please do. > 'Account/View log'

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hello Chris, > I see the same, which is not really telling me how a message was > routed to that folder. I was expecting something that showed the > filter, or filters, used to move or copy it there. Have you ever taken a look at the Account's log? If not, please do. 'Account/View log', or 'Shi

Re[2]: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

> Hello MFPA, > On Friday, November 08, 2013 you wrote: M>> Right-click any message in The Bat! and select "Test Filters." You can M>> find out the name of each filter that would process the message, and M>> what action would be taken by the filter. > Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions an

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hello MFPA, On Friday, November 08, 2013 you wrote: M> Right-click any message in The Bat! and select "Test Filters." You can M> find out the name of each filter that would process the message, and M> what action would be taken by the filter. Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions and right-c

Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

Hi On Wednesday 6 November 2013 at 9:11:20 PM, in , Chris Wilson wrote: > Not sure if this is an appropriate place to post this, > but here goes. used to be the place but I don't know now that isn't working. > Forte Agent has a very useful feature whereby you

Feature request? Messages display filtering used.

06 November 2013 Not sure if this is an appropriate place to post this, but here goes. Forte Agent has a very useful feature whereby you can view why it has filtered ("Routed" in Agent speak) a message to a certain folder. With lots of folders and the occasional complex filter I feel this wou

Re: [Feature request] disable auto-detection of S/Mime certificate to allow eID signatures

Hi On Tuesday 5 January 2010 at 9:52:56 PM, in , Stephane Bouvard wrote: > Hi, > A small request i've already made a couple of time... > just a hope that it could reach the right people at > Ritlabs :) I see you have asked on this list in previous years. Is it logged at https://www.ritlabs.co

[Feature request] disable auto-detection of S/Mime certificate to allow eID signatures

Hi, A small request i've already made a couple of time... just a hope that it could reach the right people at Ritlabs :) Could it be possible to manualy select a S/Mime certificate to sign an eMail ? In Belgium, we use an eID : the electronic identity card, with this card we can use an offici

Re: Feature Request (or help?)

Hello Steven, Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 8:53:00 AM, you wrote: SPV> If I'm missing something, please help... SPV> If not, please consider this a feature request... You could use the redirect button. This lets you change the adressee and make changes to the body. UnfortunatlyUnfor

Re: Feature Request (or help?)

Hello Steven, > The closest I can see is 'Re-send', which prompted me > about resending (I didn't) without ever offering any > opportunity to edit/adjust. Try "re-direct". That let's you edit the message. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.0.16 (ALPHA)

Re: Feature Request (or help?)

Hello Steven, On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:53:00 -0500 GMT (30/01/2008, 21:53 +0700 GMT), Steven P Vallière wrote: SPV> There are times when I would like to open a previously sent SPV> message, make a few changes and send it again, sometimes to the SPV> same person(s), sometimes to others. Move or cop

Re: Feature Request (or help?)

Hello Steven, Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 3:53:00 PM, you wrote: SPV> One can work around this shortcoming by creating a new SPV> message and cut'n'pasting from the old one, but it seems SPV> like it should be easy enough for the application to SPV> further simplify this task, as Thunderbird ha

Feature Request (or help?)

the application to further simplify this task, as Thunderbird has done. If I'm missing something, please help... If not, please consider this a feature request... -- Steven Vallière | tb 3.99.29 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "If you didn'

A little trick needed (or feature request ...)

Hi, Does someone know if it is possible, using a command-line switch or any other method, to enter the password on the command-line when using OTFE ? Greetings, -- Claude Renaud Skype : Name : renaud_claude Number : 0870445179 Using The Bat! v3.5.27 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Servic

Re: Synchronisation feature request

> But the rest of the data (or the data you want - you > need) could be put on a FTP server that you even can access the > calendar or addressbook from different computers - without "thinking" > of doing the synchronisation. > What do you think about that? Excellent idea. Let's do it -- Mar

Synchronisation feature request

Hello, I already did post this mail to the BETA-List but I didn't get any answer. So I try to start a discussion in the tbudl-list. Maybe you like my idea, maybe not. As I have seen "The Bat" offers a synchronisation function which is very important. But as I see the funtion so far "only" offers

Re: OT: Feature request - Google

Hello Leif, On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:47:07 -0700GMT (29-1-2004, 22:47 +0100, where I live), you wrote: LG> Thursday, January 29, 2004, 2:16:55 PM, you wrote: z>>> I've been using 'Daves' Quick Search Deskbar' for quite some time. z>>> Works a treat. http://www.dqsd.net/ HdB>> Thanks! Will look int

Re[2]: Feature request - Google

> I've been using 'Daves' Quick Search Deskbar' for quite some time. > Works a treat. > http://www.dqsd.net/ Never heard of that before. Sounds great! Im going to check it out. Thanks for posting it :) -- Darrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current versio

Re: Feature request - Google

Hello znark, On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:51:43 +1100GMT (29-1-2004, 21:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: z> G'day Henk, >> I am using this for quite some time and it is working like a charm! >> http://toolbar.google.com/deskbar/index.html z> I've been using 'Daves' Quick Search Deskbar' for qui

Re: Feature request - Google

Hello William, On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:38:03 +GMT (29-1-2004, 18:38, where I live), you wrote: WM> I would like to see a great big yellow button on the tool bar which, WM> when pressed, will link to www.google.com. WM> This *may* reduce messages of the type: 'where can I find WM> thispieceofs

Feature request - Google

Hello TBUDL I would like to see a great big yellow button on the tool bar which, when pressed, will link to www.google.com. This *may* reduce messages of the type: 'where can I find thispieceofsoftware?'. Removing tongue from cheek... -- Regards William http://www.residues.info Flying wi

Re[3]: Feature Request

> Apart from this. The log panel at the bottom of the screen has always seemed > to be lacking one essential detail to me - the account *name*. I am aware of > what it picks out from the log files to display, but it wouldn't be too > difficult to tack on an account name to that. As it stands, I fi

Re[2]: Feature Request

> Hi Scott, > It might be easier to look at the log file to se what the error was. I > am assuming that do do not have to many errors that often. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= I do not find it easy but then again I have multiple accounts (yea, more than any normal perso

Re[3]: Feature Request

>>> In this case the '@'-sign is changed into blue also. TF>> The colour should be changed back to normal when a successful attempt TF>> has been made. > Sure, as in 'back to normal' being either 'no new/unread mail' (black) > or 'unread mail' (blue), hence the actual state at that moment. =-=

Re[2]: Feature Request

Hello Thomas Fernandez, on Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:05:45 +0700 (2003-11-28 02:05:45 in .nl) in the message with reference you wrote (at least in part): TF> [FETCH or SEND failed] S>>> on error, change folder name color would be cool. >> Or change the '@'-sign to the left of t

Re: Feature Request

Hello Peter, On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:10:08 +0100 GMT (28/11/2003, 03:10 +0700 GMT), Peter Ouwehand wrote: [FETCH or SEND failed] S>> on error, change folder name color would be cool. > Or change the '@'-sign to the left of the account name into red. Yes, that would be a good idea IMHO. But I fe

Re[3]: Feature Request

Thursday, November 27, 2003, 1:51:09 PM, you wrote: V> Colors are a great way to draw attention to screen objects. Far more effective V> than most other factors, and this has been scientifically proven. One little V> problem I can see with this scenario is that the user might have to scroll V> up

Re[2]: Feature Request

Hi Thomas Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 8:24:56 PM, you wrote: S>>> 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is S>>> an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same S>>> sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down

Re: Feature Request

Hello Scott, on Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:55:57 -0600 (2003-11-26 18:55:57 in .nl) in the message with reference you wrote (at least in part): S> 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is S> an error getting email. When I have multiple

Re: Feature Request

Hello Gerard, > It might be easier to look at the log file to se what the error was. I > am assuming that do do not have to many errors that often. There is log file per account, so no big help. I find Scott's feature request quite reasonable. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (

Re[2]: Feature Request

Hi Thomas Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 8:24:56 PM, you wrote: S>>> 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is S>>> an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same S>>> sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down

Re[2]: Feature Request

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 08:24:56 +0700 GMT(27/11/2003, 1:24 AM + GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> I have the same problem as Scott. I get the error TF> sound, but then I have to open the logs for currently 12 TF> accounts (others have more) to see which account it was TF> that failed to pick up

Re: Feature Request

Hello Gerard, On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:14:43 +0100 GMT (27/11/2003, 02:14 +0700 GMT), Gerard wrote: S>> 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is S>> an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same S>> sound for a get email

Re: Feature Request

ON Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 6:55:57 PM, you wrote: S> 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is S> an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same S> sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down which one(s) ar

Feature Request

1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down which one(s) are the problem on error, change folder name color would be coo

Re: Feature request!

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:50:41 -0600 GMT(05/03/2003, 4:50 PM + GMT), Spyder wrote: S> Why not go 1 step further and change the font color of the errored account in S> the account list to red (or some other configurable color)? The account is S> bolding when unread messages are in it... I don'

Re: Feature Request - Launch into Notepad

Hey Peter, My MUA believes 'Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws72 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)' was used to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday, March 7, 2003 at 3:54:53 PM. PP> Albeit I wouldn't use Notepad, but my beloved GViM :-) I am with you there Peter! I had to decode a M$ Ol header

Re: simple feature request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, March 09, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote... >>> i wish: >>> - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. >> There is a way around this... set all your accounts to send at time >> of checking mail (combined delivery check box found in acc

Re: simple feature request

Hello Jonathan, On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:44:57 -0600 GMT (10/03/03, 05:44 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: >> i wish: >> - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. > There is a way around this... set all your accounts to send at time > of checking mail (combined delivery check box foun

Re: simple feature request

Hallo Task, On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:29:28 -0400GMT (9-3-03, 23:29 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TC> i wish: - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. Simple, just press F11 Whenever you miss a shortcut for a function that's already in TB, you can assign it with the shortcut editor: View -

Re: simple feature request

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, March 09, 2003, Task Control wrote... > i wish: > - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. > I never use Check for all, i never use Send for all There is a way around this... set all your accounts to send at time of checking

Re: simple feature request

Hello Task, On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:29:28 -0400 GMT (10/03/03, 05:29 +0700 GMT), Task Control wrote: > i wish: > - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. Alt-F2 does that over here. > I never use Check for all, i never use Send for all Me neither. That's why I have marked Combined De

Re: simple feature request

On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 18:29:28GMT -0400 (which was 5:29 PM where I live) Task Control wrote and made these points on the subject of "simple feature request": TC> Hellow tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com TC> i wish: TC> - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.

simple feature request

Hellow tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com i wish: - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all. I never use Check for all, i never use Send for all -- Best Regards, Task Control mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net Using: - Windows 98 4.10.1998 - AVG 6.0 Free Edition - The Bat! 1.

Re: Feature Request - Launch into Notepad

Hello Peter, > Albeit I wouldn't use Notepad, but my beloved GViM :-) OK, OK, understand. And I would use my beloved TextPad :-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.62i Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBU

Re: Feature Request - Launch into Notepad

Hi Miguel, On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:28:04 +0100 "Miguel A. Urech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't >> know any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat >> makes them seperate files/attachments so that I do no

Re: Feature Request - Launch into Notepad

Hello Spyder, > I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't know > any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat makes them > seperate files/attachments so that I do not have to endure the HTML hoopla. > When I get the attachment, I would like to v

Re: Feature request!

Hello Ricardo, > I'd rather have a visual thingie :) > > a. if winamp is running you might miss the error sound > b. I hate these plings and ploings everytime Windows scews up. I don't > want to see The Bat! going on the same route... > c. A visual someting is better because it will probably stay

Re: Feature request!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ricardo, @5-Mar-2003, 18:54 +0100 (17:54 UK time) Ricardo van Eck [RVE] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ... FBO>> FBO>> Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: FBO>> http://www.silver

Re: Feature request!

Hello Fabio, Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 17:11:46, you wrote: FBO> Hi, FBO> I already asked here for this feature here (in 2001 I think) but I got FBO> no replies at all. FBO> I think that could be a good feature a different (configurable) error FBO> sound to each account. FBO> I have a lot of

Feature Request - Launch into Notepad

I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't know any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat makes them seperate files/attachments so that I do not have to endure the HTML hoopla. When I get the attachment, I would like to view it as source code a

Re: Feature request!

Why not go 1 step further and change the font color of the errored account in the account list to red (or some other configurable color)? The account is bolding when unread messages are in it... I don't know that I could remember 30 different sounds for error and email is here. Scott v1.62 on wi

Re: Feature request!

Hello Fabio, Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:11:46 AM, you wrote: FBO> Hi, FBO> I already asked here for this feature here (in 2001 I think) but I got FBO> no replies at all. FBO> I think that could be a good feature a different (configurable) error FBO> sound to each account. FBO> I have a lot

Feature request!

Hi, I already asked here for this feature here (in 2001 I think) but I got no replies at all. I think that could be a good feature a different (configurable) error sound to each account. I have a lot of different accounts here (I think that a lot of people have too)... and every time I hear a

Re: Global filters (was:: Plug-in/Feature Request...)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote:' TF> Hm. I would think in each account you give each global filter a TF> position (or not, if you don't want the filter to be applied to that TF> account). In a central location, maybe under Qui

Global filters (was:: Plug-in/Feature Request...)

Hello Allie, On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:58:11 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 19:58 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: > If you used a global filter, how would TB! know where to apply the > filter. In fact, it may very well apply global filters first. Hm. I would think in each account you give each global

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Tim Fountain [TF] wrote:' TF> On a semi-related note, does anyone know if it's possible to setup a TF> global filter of some sort that applies to all accounts? No. This isn't possible. It will likely be possible in lat

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

On Saturday, February 22, 2003, James Olsen wrote: > There's also free Win32 version that you can very easily use with > ANY email client called SAProxy (http://saproxy.bloomba.com/). It > will scan messages and flag them as SPAM (based on your > configuration) as they are downloaded from your se

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello John, > I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. > Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program. A DOS program If you have installed POPFile you should have aPOPFile Program group in Star/Programs. There you have access to two versions of the manu

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

On Saturday, February 22, 2003, 22:11, John Morse wrote: M>> | Installing POPFile M>> | Setting up Buckets for mail classification M>> | Getting your email program to work with POPFile M>> | Training POPFile > I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. > Especially when all I ev

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Miguel A. Urech wrote: M> | Installing POPFile M> | Setting up Buckets for mail classification M> | Getting your email program to work with POPFile M> | Training POPFile I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me. Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program.

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello John, > I never could figure out how to setup Popfile. Once installed the Manual is available: ,- [ ] | To learn how to set up POPFile, please choose one of the following options. | | Installing POPFile | Setting up Buckets for mail classification | Getting your email program to wo

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Krister, > May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate? I also want > to use the best, so am curious as to why folks prefer one thing over > the other, but it's also of course a matter of preference. I'm only interested in Bayesian classification and that is only one of the op

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Krister Ekstrom wrote: MAU>> Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile. I never could figure out how to setup Popfile. -- Regards, John Morse "Pride is what we have, vanity is what others have" Current version is 1.62 | "Using TB

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Miguel, In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 21 Feb 2003 21:37:09 , you typed: >> Have you guys used SpamPal ? MAU> Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile. May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

~John, On 22-02-2003 01:25, you [~] wrote in : ~> Peter Fjelsten wrote: M>>> But that is also because Spampal has the option to "bounce" (actually M>>> a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in M>>> concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it wi

Re[2]: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin todo something on a message or group of messages

Hello Al, AJ> Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am AJ> constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way. I'm doing this a bit differently. Instead of trying to invent my own spam filters (reinvent the wheel, again), I'm using some free tools that ar

Re[3]: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to definea plugin to do something on a message or group of messages

Hi Spike, Friday, February 21, 2003, 8:08:13 PM, you wrote: S> My CNET virus newsletter filter picked up his hccnet.nl address by S> mistake. It automagically sends these virus newsletters out to a S> group containing 11,589 members. Let's see that 19 messages X 11,589 S> members, that's 220,1

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Al, @21-Feb-2003, 08:46 -0800 (16:46 UK time) Al Jacobus [AJ] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AJ> Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am AJ> constantly adding words and I know there must be another, AJ> simpler way. First

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Peter Fjelsten wrote: M>> But that is also because Spampal has the option to "bounce" (actually M>> a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in M>> concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get nowhere :) I didn't know SpamPal was capable of this... could you tel

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Miguel, On 21-02-2003 21:42, you [M] wrote in : M> But that is also because Spampal has the option to "bounce" (actually M> a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in M> concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get nowhere :) ? Is that

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Good night Tim, It was foretold that on 21-2-2003 @ 06:53:20 GMT+1100 (which was 20:53:20 where I live) Tim would mumble: T> For Windows, there's a simple installer that will install the minimum T> Perl needed. Yep, that did the trick. Tnx. -- Best regards, Luc

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hi Thomas and list, MG> On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36 MG> where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made MG> these valuable points on the subject of "Plug-in/Feature Request to MG> allow one to define a plugin to do somethi

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hi Thomas and list, On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36 where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to do something on a message or gro

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Thomas, > I haven't used spampal, but I see that it is not that easy to > configure, judging from the recent flushing of TBUDL by one Frank > Nijkamp. ;-) But that is also because Spampal has the option to "bounce" (actually a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello ~John, > Have you guys used SpamPal ? Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Mark, > I'm willing to give POPFile a try, however. What is the URL? http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http:

Re[2]: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to definea plugin to do something on a message or group of messages

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:52:02GMT +0700 (which was 2:52 PM in the tropics where I live) Thomas Fernandez posted: TF> Come again? How can that misconfigured spampal reply have triggered a TF> filter to send the message to 11,000+ people? My CNET virus ne

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

ON Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:46:39 PM, you wrote: AJ> Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am AJ> constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way. Al, Here is my tip: After filtering out al "know" email try searching for "To unsubscribe" in TEXT.

Re[2]: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin todo something on a message or group of messages

Hello Miguel, Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:57:08 PM, you wrote: MAU> Hello Clive, >> I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5% >> accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's >> not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive, MAU> Fully agree with

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Miguel A. Urech wrote: >> I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5% >> accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's >> not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive, M> Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam M> messages per d

Re: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define aplugin to do something on a message or group of messages

Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without altering the subject. On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 9:07 you wrote subject: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Re

Re: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define aplugin to do something on a message or group of messages

Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without altering the subject. On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 11:00 you wrote subject: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Re

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Clive, > I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5% > accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's > not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive, Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam messages per day and the last ti

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Peter, In a message with [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 21 Feb 2003 16:13:35 , you typed: M>> Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed M>> in the blacklists. PF> There are many different blacklists.

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Peter ~>> Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/ PF> Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup. I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5% accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's not filtered into my spam folder.

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Al, > Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am > constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way. Use POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ which takes care by itself about "adding words", and in any language. -- Best regards, Miguel A.

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Hello Marck, Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way. -- Al Jacobus Using TheBat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @21-Feb-2003, 16:13 +0100 (15:13 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: PF> With the amount of spam today I feel this is the only way to go. ... if blacklists have a positive effect on incoming spam,

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ~John, @21-Feb-2003, 09:08 -0600 (15:08 UK time) ~John [j] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: M>> Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO. j> thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ? I don't use it my

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Marck, On 21-02-2003 16:01, you [M] wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: PF>> Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup. M> Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO. M> Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed M> in the black

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

Marck D Pearlstone wrote: M> Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO. thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ? -- Regards, ~John Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, @21-Feb-2003, 15:53 +0100 (14:53 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ~>> Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/ PF> Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup. Blacklists a

  1   2   3   >