Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone
Hello David, I think this might help you accomplish your goal: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.0/english/install/guide/install_phones.html#wp1056189 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tamer, I am able to access voicemail using messages button. I was trying to configure the services button similar to CUE voiceview but on Unity Connection Thanks, DA On 11/10/10, rsmail...@solcon.nl rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote: Tamer, try dialing the pilot point directly. for example dial 5600 (VM pilot) Do you get the unity prompt or not ? then check the VM pilot and VM profile settings. make sure the phone uses the VM profile. also if you press the voicemail button, and nothing happens. the service doesn't exist or no VM profile configured for that phone. regards, Ron Hi Tamer, Any idea what the service url is to configure on CUCM for Voice View Access on Unity Connection Thanks, DA On 11/10/10, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote: David, Yes it should works. Check if you have voicemail service in phone services tab, and check what is your default voicemail profile. Tamer, -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David A Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone Hi All, The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto Voicemail system via the services button on phone. This works fine for CUE access. Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is it possible? Thanks, DA ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone
David, Is the Service Category * setup as Java MIDLet or XML Service? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:26 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Roger, I followed the document. When I test the url http://x.x.x.x/midlets/VisualVoicemail/VisualVoicemail.jad with my unity connection ip addr. I get an error -NOT Found. Do I need a seperate license? Thanks for the help. DA On 11/10/10, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com wrote: Hello David, I think this might help you accomplish your goal: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.0/english/install/guide/install_phones.html#wp1056189 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tamer, I am able to access voicemail using messages button. I was trying to configure the services button similar to CUE voiceview but on Unity Connection Thanks, DA On 11/10/10, rsmail...@solcon.nl rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote: Tamer, try dialing the pilot point directly. for example dial 5600 (VM pilot) Do you get the unity prompt or not ? then check the VM pilot and VM profile settings. make sure the phone uses the VM profile. also if you press the voicemail button, and nothing happens. the service doesn't exist or no VM profile configured for that phone. regards, Ron Hi Tamer, Any idea what the service url is to configure on CUCM for Voice View Access on Unity Connection Thanks, DA On 11/10/10, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote: David, Yes it should works. Check if you have voicemail service in phone services tab, and check what is your default voicemail profile. Tamer, -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David A Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone Hi All, The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto Voicemail system via the services button on phone. This works fine for CUE access. Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is it possible? Thanks, DA ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] The simplest config for CBarge
Hello, Do you have more details about this issue? It wouldn´t hurt if you add some sdi traces to your problem description. Can you see CUCM looking for CFB resources in the Default List? Regards. Roger Carpio. On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Hi, I'm playing with CBarge on a shared line between HQ phone 2 and BR1 phone 2. The proctor guide specifies that 2 dspfarm conferencing profiles are needed (1 on HQ router and 1 on BR1 router), each associated to separate MRG/MRGL, which is later applied to both phones. I made 2 observations: 1) when I tried not to use MRGLs and leave both CFBs in the default MRGL, CBarge didn't work. why is that? The media resources not associated with any MRG should be available to everybody. 2) when I configured only one CFB (no matter whether on HQ or BR1 router) and put it in a single MRG/MRGL associated with both phones, it worked. That would suggest we need only 1 CFB. Could anybody confirm these observations? I'm especially interested in explaining question 1. Is there anything in the documentation explaining this behaviour? regards kobel ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....
Mudassar, Which wildcard did you use? 91X will block any number from 91[0 thru 9]. Actually this wouldn't let you type any 4th digit since it is the closest match when dialing a 900 numbers. To block 900 numbers; I would use the device-line CSS approach with RP 91900XXX in partition blocked assigned to the IP phones line CSS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.comwrote: Hi Experts, while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all phones. ? wild card has no effect if the number is not consecutive zeros after 91900 digit string. CUCM help says: The route pattern 91X? routes or blocks all numbers in the range 91 through 919. But I am not able to hit this pattern unless I dial consecutive zeros. Would anybody highlight its usage? Thanks, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access
Hello ShinGei, Thanks for the info. In the end, MGCP will not make it for us [?] Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:34 AM, ShinGei Yong shingei.y...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Roger, MVA on a MGCP control gateway is possible.In fact,that is a coexisting of both MGCP and H323 on the same gateway,but you could not used a MGCP control PRI for MVA. you may refer to Netpro for own interest. https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2005673 Shingei. On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ShinGei , bkvalentine, Rogers et al I remember it was successful last time when I configured it another lab when HQ was h323. Now I was confused around dial-peers hence had the question. I will give a try now with MGCP + H323 on HQ and it should work. Thanks all. Shrini *From:* ShinGei Yong [mailto:shingei.y...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, January 02, 2011 6:42 AM *To:* Shrini; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access Hi Shrini, What about your UCM configuration? 1. is your H323 GW registered with UCM? 2. what is your dialing behavior internally?4 or 10?if is 4, then your in outbound dp should be 4 digit patten as well instead of 10. Please provide more info Shingei On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, *Wish you all a Happy and Prosperous New Year 2011* First question this year :-) HQ Site is MGCP. When I call HQ Phone 5002 , HQ PSTN is ringing -- all is good. I have configured MVA number 5999 in service parameters and Media Resources -- MVA -- 5999 / PT-INTERNAL / English on router. application service cmm http://177.1.10.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml ! ! dial-peer voice 5999 pots service cmm incoming called-number 2123945999 no digit-strip Also on CUCM : But when I call 2123945999 from HQ PSTN 2123942123 I am getting fast busy tone. It is not invoking the vxml script. What am I doing wrong here ? TIA Shrini ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com 330.gif___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access
Hello, Did you add this gateway as H323 in CUCM as well? Features and Services guide does not seem to mention MGCP for this feature. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fsmobmgr.html#wp1206437 Were you specifically asked to have MVA and MGCP without H323? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Experts, *Wish you all a Happy and Prosperous New Year 2011* First question this year :-) HQ Site is MGCP. When I call HQ Phone 5002 , HQ PSTN is ringing -- all is good. I have configured MVA number 5999 in service parameters and Media Resources -- MVA -- 5999 / PT-INTERNAL / English on router. application service cmm http://177.1.10.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml ! ! dial-peer voice 5999 pots service cmm incoming called-number 2123945999 no digit-strip Also on CUCM : But when I call 2123945999 from HQ PSTN 2123942123 I am getting fast busy tone. It is not invoking the vxml script. What am I doing wrong here ? TIA Shrini ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue
Hello Deepak, Have you ran the debug isdn q921 on this GW? If so; do you see messages going back and forth between the RTR and the PSTN? Could you please attach the configuration of T1 controller 0/0/0 as well? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Deepak sidana sidana_dee...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi All, I am trying to connect the T1 from Br1-RTR to PSTN-WAN. Only when i use service mgcp, under controller, layer 2 isdn staus as TEI_ASSIGNED. At PSTN-WAN Router, i am using isdn protocol-emulate network under s0/0/0:23 Branch1 Config:- BR1-RTR#sh isdn sta Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 ISDN Serial0/0/0:23 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED ! controller T1 0/0/1 framing esf linecode b8zs cablelength long 0db ! interface Serial0/0/0:23 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager isdn incoming-voice voice no cdp enable Please share you experince, if some one faced the same issue. ThanksRgds Deepak Sidana. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK-Controlled Trunk in CUCM
Michael, You do not need to add the GW to CUCM; otherwise this will not be scalable at all. I had the same confusion but then I got it to work without adding my GW (CME) to CUCM. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote: I was trying to understand the Gatekeeper-controlled Trunk in CUCM. If I configured the Gatekeeper-controlled Trunk, do I still have to configured the H323 gateways? Consider this scenario: GW --- GK --- CUCM If there's a call from GW to CUCM, my understanding was: 1) GW sends ARQ to GK. 2) GK resolves the called number and sends ACF to GW. 3) GW will try to communicate with CUCM. In step 3, if GW was not configured in CUCM, the call will fail. Did I understand this wrong? Thanks! Michael ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK-Controlled Trunk in CUCM
Michael, All I can say is that I had the same behavior in the past; now I can get it to work without adding the CME to CUCM. I know that by default for security reasons CUCM will deny connections from unknown sources; however to me the gatekeeper controlled trunk seems like an exception. In regards to the CSS; you use the Trunk's CSS for incoming calls. If you wish I can take some traces from my lab and share them with you for further analysis. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Roger, I was hoping the same as you. But I couldn't figure out who to get it worked without adding the H323 GW (CME) to CUCM. From my observation, adding H323 GW (CME) to CUCM is needed because: 1) For security reason, CUCM won't accept H323 connection from an unknown source (ie. not configured in CUCM). 2) Without the GW configured in CUCM, there's no way to configure in-bound call parameters, such as Calling Search Space, Significant Digits, etc. So I guess without the GW being configured on CUCM, you can make outbound calls (from CUCM to CME). But you cannot make inbound calls (from CME to CUCM). Michael On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.comwrote: Michael, You do not need to add the GW to CUCM; otherwise this will not be scalable at all. I had the same confusion but then I got it to work without adding my GW (CME) to CUCM. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote: I was trying to understand the Gatekeeper-controlled Trunk in CUCM. If I configured the Gatekeeper-controlled Trunk, do I still have to configured the H323 gateways? Consider this scenario: GW --- GK --- CUCM If there's a call from GW to CUCM, my understanding was: 1) GW sends ARQ to GK. 2) GK resolves the called number and sends ACF to GW. 3) GW will try to communicate with CUCM. In step 3, if GW was not configured in CUCM, the call will fail. Did I understand this wrong? Thanks! Michael ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 79XX remote control
Hello, What does this have to do with the CCIE Lab preparation? I bet you'll get a lot of answers if you google it. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:44 AM, haroon javed harooon.ja...@gmail.comwrote: Does anyone know of any preferably software that will allow you to mange the Cisco 79xx series of phones remotely. We have a large amount of phones that are staticly assinged and are moving to a new CM server with a different IP. The CM and TFTP entries specifcly need to be change to reflect the new IP of the CM server. Thanks -- Regards, *Haroon Javed* *Telecom Engineer* Cell: +92 (321) 8430260 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP configuration at cisco.com
Hello, You're following the configuration example of a T1 CAS while you're configuring a T1 PRI. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:27 PM, linuxboss.9 linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote: Do we need to add ccm-manager mgcpapp under incoming dial-peer of MGCP http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_example09186a008022eaa3.shtml I configure like this below mgcp mgcp call-agent 177.1.10.10 service mgcp mgcp bind control source-interface g0/0.250 mgcp bind media source-interface g0/0.250 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band ccm-manager redundant-host 177.1.10.10 ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager mgcp under serial0/0/0:23 isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager And it worked all times with any issues. Just looking at Cisco documentation it is different. Please advice Thanks Shrini ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RisDC VM usage incrementing
Open a case with Cisco TAC please for further investigation, this is a CCIE study list. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a customer where RisDC service is using some 350MB Virtual memory but it increments with passage of time till it gets to 950MB (within a month). As soon as it hit 950MB mark, RTMT starts throwing alerts as VM falls below 30%. First we thought it’s tomcat which is using excessive memory but then after a bit of investigation found it’s using normal VM (~940MB). I have searched over the internet but that did not help. Customer wants to know why it increase as there are only 1000 users. Has anyone come across this issue of RisDC? Can it be a memory leak issue? Please find below the server tech specs: admin:show hardware HW Platform : 7835I2 Processors: 1 Type : Family: Xeon CPU Speed : 2333 Memory: 2048 MBytes Object ID : 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.585 OS Version: UCOS 4.0.0.0-37 Serial Number : RAID Version : RAID Firmware Version: 5.2-0 (15432) RAID BIOS Version: 5.2-0 (15432) BIOS Information : 1.17 RAID Details : Controllers found: 1 admin:show version active *Active Master Version: 7.1.5.11901-1* Active Version Installed Software Options: dp-ffr.3-1-15.GB.cop cm-locale-en_GB-7.1.5.1000-1.cop cm-locale-cs_CZ-7.1.5.1000-1.cop localeinstaller admin:show memory size This command is not supported by this server model. admin:show memory show memory count show memory modules show memory size admin:show memory count This command is not supported by this server model. Thanks Ash ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC - issue with switching between softphone and deskphone modes
I have seen the same exact issue, other times the same configuration works just fine. I have never collected logs when the issue happened to me though. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've configured softphone and deskphone modes for CUPC. Both work fine, I can make calls, etc. The issue is that I can't easily switch between them. When I'm in softphone mode and click deskphone mode, nothing happens. In order to force change of mode, I need to restart CUPC each time. After restart it's in deskphone mode. The same in the other direction (deskhone softphone). Has anybody seen this? I was wondering if this is some obvious misconfiguration or a bug... regards kobel ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco SIP phone not registering in SRST
telephony-service instead and call-manager-fallback are not used for SIP SRST. I would try removing the number from the voice register pools. I've had the same error message in the past and not with SIP SRST but with SIP CME. The problem was related to the DN. voice register pool 1 id network 10.2.3.0 mask 255.255.0.0 codec g711ulaw voice register pool 2 id network 10.2.3.0 mask 255.255.0.0 codec g711ulaw Have you tried this? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote: Can you try using telephony-service instead of call-manager-fallback. On 2/8/2011 4:00 PM, Chris wrote: I am having issues with registering my sip phone during SRST my SCCP phone registers just fine. Is it possible to register both SCCP and SIP phones in SRST? The phone does not register and I receive the error: .Feb 8 23:51:11.575: VOICE_REG_POOL: Register request for (3001) from (10.2.3.145) .Feb 8 23:51:11.575: VOICE_REG_POOL: Contact doesn't match any pools Here is my SIP SRST config the complete config is attached: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip no supplementary-service h450.2 no supplementary-service h450.3 h323 call start slow sip bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.302 bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.302 registrar server voice register global max-dn 144 max-pool 24 voice register pool 1 id network 10.2.3.0 mask 255.255.0.0 number 1 3001 codec g711ulaw voice register pool 2 id network 10.2.3.0 mask 255.255.0.0 number 1 30.. codec g711ulaw Thanks, Chris Lundi ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] High Traffic Try Again Later
7.1.5 is not the version running in the CCIE Lab. Open a TAC case for further research. On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Tatiana Oliveira tati_olivei...@yahoo.com wrote: I´m receiving High Traffic Try Again Later on Cisco 7965 Phones and I´m using the 7.1.5.1-12. Do you have any idea about how to solve that? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hardware VPN
I use a cheap 831, IP phones with power bricks setup as daisy chain and it has worked just fine so far. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Experts, i need assisitance on what device will be the most economical and most appropriate for using IPEXPERT's Hardware VPN. This is what i think please let me know if its a good idea 1, 800 series router with VPN capabilities 2, POE 12 port switch 3, 3 7965G iP PHONES I hope i am not leaving anything out. Pithog Oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OT : Missing normal softkeys from 9971.
9971 are not evaluated in CCIE Lab as far as I know therefore, this is not the right place for this question. Try doing some google or post this question at Cisco Support forums. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/9971_9951_8961/8_5/english/user_guide/book_911/callingfeatures_rt.html#wp1027556 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:41 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: I'm hoping i missed something simple. I just got a 9971 registered on a CUCM 7.x server. it works great but I noticed there are no available softkeys for hold, park , etc during a call. It's my first SIP phone I'm using, so is there something I'm missing regarding supplemental services? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB II, Lab 10, Calling Party Localization
Hello George, Very rarely I've seen replication status 2 and weird behaviors happen. Have you checked replication anywhere else? CLI / Unified Reporting? If you've done this many times and you're sure the configuration has been done correctly; drop this replication and reset it cluster wide. I hope it helps. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if anyone has seen this before. There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in E164 format, but in alerting/connected state it should be localized for user. Subscriber to 7digit, national to 10digit, international to 011 I have configured correct prefixes on the incoming gateways, so Missed/Received directory is fine! It shows correct values with the +sign E164 format. And I have configured pt-norm-hq-ani, pt-norm-br1-ani, pt-norm-br2-ani, which are in their corresponding css-norm-hq-ani, css-norm-br1-ani, css-norm-br2-ani and I've applied them to the corresponding Device Pools, in Calling Party Transformation CSS. But when the call comes in, I still get in alerting/connected state E164 format. All my devices phones and gateways are registered to Sub first, and in failed to Publisher. If I change this and I register all the devices to the Publisher, instead of a subscriber, changing it in Callmanager group configuration, then it all works as expected. Therefore I thought maybe Sub is not replicating correctly, but I've checked and the replication Status is 2! which means it's replicating fine. I have even restarted the Subscriber but it didn't fix the issue. I am out of ideas, and I've done it many times in prior Labs, and it has always worked fine! I've searched through CCM Service Parameters, and couldn't find anything that could affect this behaviour. If anyone has seen this, please let me know... Regards, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Local Gateway/Standard Local Route Group
How many sites are supposed to use this RP? If only one site is meant to use it; SLRG will have an extra step (assigning the RG to the DP). Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.comwrote: If i have a requirement to only use local gateway for a route pattern, is it advisable to use a specific route list pointing to the route group with the gateway or a route list pointing to a SLRG will do? Rogers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One Week Lab Experience - April 11 thru 15 - Who will attend?
Pablo, I'll see you there :-) Regards, Roger Carpio. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I am just wondering how will attend to April 19th's One Week Lab Experience boot camp in San Jose for CCIE Voice? Regards. -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One Week Lab Experience - April 11 thru 15 - Who will attend?
I think Pablo got confused; title and message body don't match... I'll see you there on April 11th Regards, Roger Carpio. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney) stden...@cisco.comwrote: I’ll be there as well (assuming you meant April 11th and not 19th) :) cheers, sd *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Roger Carpio *Sent:* Friday, April 01, 2011 7:46 PM *To:* Pablo Meneses *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One Week Lab Experience - April 11 thru 15 - Who will attend? Pablo, I'll see you there :-) Regards, Roger Carpio. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, I am just wondering how will attend to April 19th's One Week Lab Experience boot camp in San Jose for CCIE Voice? Regards. -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK
Jonny. I know how can you pass this exam. Stop wasting your time and ours looking for a way to cheat and get to study. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Jonny Mendas jonny.men...@hotmail.comwrote: ok sry justin if u feel thats ok.. i think i got more tensed bec of 3 attempts now no money. but lab is so hard. i do not know how we can pas! Thankyou -- From: jbr...@tsginc.biz To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:47:27 + Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK Can a moderator remove Johnny from this list? This is a clear violation of the NDA and I’m sure no one on this list wants anything to do with him. Justin *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Jonny Mendas *Sent:* Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:50 AM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 5 every location with SIP TRUNK LAB 5 update Presence IPPM needs to be configured for one of the phones One of the HQPhones need to be set up in softphone mode on the test pC = IPCC was full page IPPA service needs to be configured and assigned to a couple of lines 3101 and 2102 === AAR Configure AAR for calls between SiteC and HQ == RINGLIST SIP TRUNK Need to create a SIP trunk to an IP and write a note Trust me guys i was unable to remember it ... otherwise i would have shared it.. full lab.. If anyone got this lab we can work out and make full lab!!! Or anyone has real labs i heard they also released full lab 5 Please guys i need to pass anyhow now i heard it is over everywhere!! means every location. Please PM for the same. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Certificates for Cisco Presence Server
Did you read this on some Cisco documentation or are you just following what you were told? The latter won't let you go further down CCIE's path. Check the deployment guide and if you confirm there is a certificate requirement to get Presence server to work for your CCIE Lab, please let me know it. http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence,_Release_7.x_--_Deployment_of_Cisco_Unified_Presence Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:47 AM, lee huntl huntc...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, I am having trouble to get the Cisco Presence server to work. I was told I need to install a *root certificate* (*.cer) onto the Cisco Presence server for it to work. But other than this root Certificate from the CA server, is there any other certificate I need in order to get it to work?? Thanks, Hunt ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Help with SIP Firmware
Auto register it to CUCM. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All I converted my 7961 phone to SIP Load for a Lab but am not able to revert the Phone to SCCP Load. For changing any network settings on the phone, like TFTP etc, the phone prompts for Authorization with Username Password. Has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest how should I revert the phone back to factory defaults or procedure to edit network settings? A big thanks in advance. . Mann ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice mail in CUPS
Before adding the user to UC; did you configure the Allow Users to Access Voice Mail Using an IMAP Client option in COS? On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote: hi all, can someone advice, what i miss in CUPS voicemail. I kept geeting this error from Show Server Health in CUPC client *Failed to Connect - Invalid Credentials or Account Locked* ** I verified user name and password for voicemail is working in Phone itself tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question
CCM service Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720; just type the trunk name. Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720? Thanks, Randall HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone HQ master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone HQ master gateway list: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 Zone HQ prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 5: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 Zone HQ prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 5: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC
That should do it. If they do not show the requested port after adding the trunk name to the service parameter I would try resetting the trunk; resetting CCM service, gatekeeper shut/no shut etc. Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks for all the answers. I did search the services for 1720 and entered gk-trunk. I'm working on WB2 lab 2 and the output from the PG shows port 1720 and my output shows 40081 and 33277 respectively below. The questions in the WB has output and says the port should show 1720 no 40081 and 33277. This is what I am trying to do. The PG did not specify anything specific as well. Should I not worry about this? Randall -- *From:* Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com *To:* Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question CCM service Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720; just type the trunk name. Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720? Thanks, Randall HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone HQ master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone HQ master gateway list: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 Zone HQ prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 5: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 Zone HQ prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 5: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE/CME
Look at the folder's name in flash memory where GUI files are stored. It must match what you defined under ip http path flash:/GUI and btw is case sensitive :-P Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI, Here is a dumb question, but causing me issues. My cue is stable and I can log in to the web page with the user from the cue cli. Now when I start the initialization wizard I keep getting login to CME as administrator failed. check CME config. Am I suppose to use the user under tele-service? In my case admin/c1sc0123? snip-its ip http server ip http authentication local no ip http secure-server ip http path flash:/GUI telephony-service max-ephones 7 max-dn 7 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000 voicemail 3600 max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T web admin system name admin password c1sc0123 dn-webedit transfer-system full-consult transfer-pattern . transfer-pattern .T ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] frame-relay traffic-shaping on the test
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable. That's the one I use. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers, frame-relay traffic shaping will be enabled. I know it will use the bandwidth that you configure for shaping. I also understand on the HQ router, the link to SiteC would default to 56k in frame-relay traffic shaping. Let's assume nothing is asked for QOS on the SiteC connection. My instinct is to configure the bandwith on the SITE C link to 1544 so that the link will not be affected. Am I using the correct value for this scenario? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called party transformation mask vs. route pattern/route list manipulation
I would say it all depends on the dial plan. Both can pretty much accomplish the same; the problem at least for me is, how complex it gets when TEHO, backup GWs and calling/called party presentation comes into play. In my opinion CdPT patterns are scalable and they help you reduce your dial plan however the CCIE does not care about scalability, just functionality. Get used to both approaches; old school and the one introduced in CUCM 7; then you should be able to come with an action plan when your sitting in the lab. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: The list is probably tired of hearing from me tonight :) So when should you choose Called party transformation mask over route pattern/route list manipulation. I ran into a question with Device mobility that required called party transformation, but I can't identify any other scenarios where i would absolutely want to use called party transformation. Does it make plus dialing manipulation easier? Regards, Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP Debug in CUCM
John, No debugs in CUCM for DHCP but you still have the Cisco DHCP Monitor Service Traces and packet capture. There is no way to bind the MAC of a device to an IP address as far as I can tell; there is no option in GUI to accomplish this. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:45 AM, John Anzar janzar1...@live.com wrote: Hi Guys I have a very basic question about DHCP. most of the time this works with out any issue. Is there anyway that we can DHCP debug in CUCM ?? Can we get the mac biind with the IP form CUCM ? Best Regards J anzar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST reference necessary?
That's your SRST reference. On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Greg cnn...@gmail.com wrote: If I have only SCCP phones, do I still need to configure SRST reference in CUCM? I thought I could just specify the default router as SRST in device pool. Was that correct? Thanks! Greg ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LAN-WAN
Hummm it all depends; real world or CCIE lab? Are you sending packets already tagged to the switch? Then you might just honor it and pass it thru or have some policing based on the tags, like guarantee some bandwidth for voice but drop COS to 0 when exceeded. I think you have some options to play with based on whatever you want to accomplish. On the CCIE test you'll be provided with the requirements on that port; if any. Saludos, Roger Carpio. On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: Hello All, What QOS most to be configured at port F0/0 that connect gateway WAN with switch LAN. In other Word what QOS applies to port Sw that connect Gateway WAN, How to be classify the input/output to port the goes to LAN Flow QOS Ipphone--port Sw--SW--SWportGW-fa0/0GW(here is doubt)-WAN Thanks. -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLF or FR12 ONLY between HQ and SB - what to do with BR2
The map-class is the workaround and as far as I know the bandwidth command wont work. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: I think if you set the bandwidth to greater than 768 you will not have this applied to the interface for BR2 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es wrote: Hi all, If in the exam in Qos WAN exercise were asked to configure MLF or FR12 between HQ and SB, supposing there is only one physical interface in HQ, the traffic shaping applied will affect the BR2 subintertace appliying a default mincir 28000 which is a problem for more than one call HQ#sh frame-relay pvc 102 cir 56000 bc 7000 be 0 byte limit 875interval 125 mincir 28000 byte increment 875 Adaptive Shaping none pkts 533 bytes 168144pkts delayed 526 bytes delayed 166528 shaping active traffic shaping drops 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue 39/40, 56 drop, 531 dequeued HQ# Should we create this specific class map for BR2 as a workaround, or shouldn’t we do anything because nothing has been required for BR2 and we would breaking a requirement? map-class frame-relay BR2 frame-relay cir 1536000 frame-relay bc 15360 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 1536000 Which would be the right answer? What do you think? Thanks in advance! Regards Francesc Francesc Xavier Roig Borrell Network Senior Consultant Integración de Sistemas y Tecnología C/Santander, 49-51 Barcelona 08020 Tel. Fijo: (+34) 934965108 ext 64697 Tel. Móvil / Fax: (+34) 647 32 21 55 (24697) / (+34) 934965161 email: francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es http://www.tecnocom.es *Por favor, antes de imprimir este mensaje, asegúrate de que es necesario. Ayudemos a cuidar el medio ambiente* *Este mensaje puede contener información confidencial o privilegiada. Si le ha llegado por error, rogamos no haga uso del mismo, avise al remitente y bórrelo. **Consulte **aviso legalhttp://www.tecnocom.es/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx * *This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please do not use it, notify the sender of the error and delete it. **See **legal noticehttp://www.tecnocom.es/sites/en/Paginas/InformacionLegal.aspx * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image001.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCS
How is this related to the CCIE Lab preparation? I bet there is a sql query to retrieve that information but I don't see how can this help us in the lab. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: Hello all ** ** Canyone tell me if exist any command from CLI in CUCM to shown me that include within a Calling Search space? What Partitions are in that CCS?*** * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Thanks. ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)
Santiago, This is a question I would expect from an end user; not someone who's preparing for the CCIE Lab. Please do your homework; get detailed sdi/sdl traces, app logs, packet captures and if those don't give you the answer; forward them to me and I'll take a look at them. Please don't take it personal, we've all went thru basic configuration issues when we started but let's just try to keep the distribution list at expert level as much as possible. Perhaps if you ask for help telling us what you have done; you wouldn't receive an answer like mine. Finally, from my experience; look at the back of the IP phone and make sure you are adding the correct phone model in CUCM. An App log will easily show you this mismatch if that were the case. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: Hello I have a doubt what is reason the ip phone 7941 do not registered to cucm the status reject, I am sure the MAC and phone type in the cucm is add correctly. ** ** Thanks. ** ** ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] E164 with sip trunk
Hello, I am not sure I am following you, so the call uses a SIP trunk from CUCM to ?? Then there is an MGCP call? Where do we loose the E164 number? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:19 AM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote: hi , how do we make call using SIP trunk, so it will show +E164 in PSTN phone ? this is MGCP call tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] about problem creating SIP profile in CME
Not sure if this will help but have you deleted the profile 1, make sure the file is gone and then configure it again? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Marco zurdo zurdosp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mailers i have a trouble creating the SIP profile for pool 1 i changed the id mac with the correct one, but i created the profile in the service global, i check the tftp bind and i see the *cnf with the id mac that i change show voice register tftp-bind tftp-server syncinfo.xml url flash:/syncinfo.xml tftp-server SIPDefault.cnf url flash:/SIPDefault.cnf tftp-server softkeyDefault_kpml.xml url flash:/softkeyDefault_kpml.xml tftp-server softkeyDefault.xml url flash:/softkeyDefault.xml tftp-server softkey1_kpml.xml url flash:/softkey1_kpml.xml tftp-server softkey1.xml url flash:/softkey1.xml tftp-server cme_dialplan_1.xml url flash:/cme_dialplan_1.xml tftp-server SIP003094C423D4.cnf url flash:/SIP003094C423D4.cnf (i change this) tftp-server SIP000D299D348C.cnf url flash:/SIP000D299D348C.cnf but whe i trie to see the cnf file this i get thie error :%Error opening flash:/SIP003094c423d4.cnf (File not found) any ideas. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid phone firmware upgrade in the lab
If the previous candidate using your lab spot changed the protocol as requested, let's say his lab had SIP and now yours is SCCP; there is nothing you can do to avoid this. It is not necessarily a waste of time; unless you keep staring at the phones LOL Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Experts, what should i do so as to avoid phone firmware upgrade at the lab, i have discovered that some times i unknowingly have a phone firmware upgrade from one version to another. Kind assist it is usually a waste of time. Pithog Oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid phone firmware upgrade in the lab
Dave, Nobody can guarantee that phones will be restored to a pre-decided firmware version, while proctors definitely restore the lab to an almost blank config; restoring the firmware requires some config and they just won't do it for you. Just like CUE, it might be licensed for CME and your lab requests JTAPI integration but fear not; if you have to do the conversion; all you need is to know how to do it; files will be provided... Easy as pie. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:25 PM, CCIE Voice ccvoic...@gmail.com wrote: Do you say that Lab will not be restored to a pre-decided configurations on all devices before begining of each test? OR in initial lab setup , phones not having access to CUCM / CME for firmware changes? Dave On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.comwrote: If the previous candidate using your lab spot changed the protocol as requested, let's say his lab had SIP and now yours is SCCP; there is nothing you can do to avoid this. It is not necessarily a waste of time; unless you keep staring at the phones LOL Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi Experts, what should i do so as to avoid phone firmware upgrade at the lab, i have discovered that some times i unknowingly have a phone firmware upgrade from one version to another. Kind assist it is usually a waste of time. Pithog Oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Contcat Center Express VM
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=UCCX+OS I would suggest you to use google first and if you can't find it anywhere then let us know... Regards, Roger Carpio. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:41 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote: I need help to get Cisco Contact center express 7 virtual machine so I can work in my home lab, I have Cisco Contact center express 7 installer but I don't have OS installer, If someone can help me to get direct Virtual Machine (VM) that will be fine. -Original Message- From: Ravindra Lakpriya [mailto:lakpr...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:38 PM To: shelesh Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Contcat Center Express VM Whats the issue you are facing ? On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I need your guys help to get Cisco Contact center express VM machine, for CCIE study. Can anyone help me to get this. Raj. __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6033 (20110411) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Ravindra Lakpriya __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6033 (20110411) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6033 (20110411) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How do i change a Phone registered to CUCM from SIP to SCCP
In regards to the SIP to SCCP conversion; the easiest way is to enable auto registration making sure the protocol setup for this is SCCP. Obviously there shouldn't be any record for this IP phone in CUCM. In regards to the other question, first you need to understand why does the IP phone request the image; then you can come up with a solution. Troubleshooting Cisco IP Phone Registration Problems with Cisco CallManager 3.x and 4.x http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_tech_note09186a008009485a.shtml#topic1 Do not worry about the version; IP phone registration is pretty much the same. Once you understand how this works; you won't ever have to ask this question. There are other good documents at cisco.com with much more information than this; I'll recommend you to take a look at them if you still have additional questions. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Experts, How do i change a phone registered to CUCM from SIP to SCCP, also there are situations where the firmware on the phone is different from the one the tftp server is giving me , that means an upgrade will start taking place, how do i ensure the phone receives IP address without upgrading its FIRMWARE . Kind Regards Sola Ayoade ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check
I agree with Randall, if you hit # the call will match 9011!# right away, no need to use urgent priority. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote: Still. I just tried it on my lab with patterns: 9011! 9011!# And 9011# routed immediately without using urgent priority. That is because ! excludes # as a digit. From the help, it says: The exclamation point (!) wildcard matches one or more digits in the range 0 through 9.. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Victor Malyuga victor_maly...@yahoo.comwrote: I said international pattern ending with # try 9011! and 9011!# without urgent priority. You will have to wait for interdigit timeout for 9011# --- On *Sun, 26/6/11, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com* wrote: From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check To: Victor Malyuga victor_maly...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com Date: Sunday, 26 June, 2011, 20:58 I disagree, it is not needed for pattern ending in #. Usually it is for patterns starting in \+ AND ending in ! and 9911 as exception. A few more special cases maybe. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Victor Malyuga victor_maly...@yahoo.comhttp://uk.mc290.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=victor_maly...@yahoo.com wrote: international pattern ending with # sign. --- On *Sun, 26/6/11, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.comhttp://uk.mc290.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=f.faraday...@gmail.com * wrote: From: donny f f.faraday...@gmail.comhttp://uk.mc290.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=f.faraday...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comhttp://uk.mc290.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, 26 June, 2011, 16:08 hi all, for Route Pattern in lab. when we need to check urgent priority. I only use for 911 and 9911. do we need to use for AAR RP : \+.1 or other Route Pattern ? what is the best practice tks -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 question
Well you might want to check what happened to that interface. Run the show traffic-shape; if it looks fine to you, then leave it like that :) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/command/reference/qrfcmd11.html#wp1019473 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all when you configure FRF.12 manually on your seial interfaces on HQ and BR2 on the HQ router where the same physical interface is used to connect BR1 and BR2, BR1 link isn't affected at all because traffic shaping isn't enabled on the physical interface, correct ? so i can pretty much ignore that link in regards to a basic QoS config if not needed thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed
Excellent George!!! Shall we celebrate with a Bacon Maple Sundae? Congratulations :-) On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote: What kind of technical problem you faced and managed to get a voucher? My router rebooted halfway due to traceback consider technical problem ? Haha... I didn't get any extra time for it and even spend extra time to run back and fore to inform the proctor =[ bad luck Sent from my iPhone Pls pardon my fat fingers. On Jun 29, 2011, at 9:44 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, As the subject suggests, it's official, I'm dual CCIE #19926 RS and Voice starting yesterday. Finally, it's a relief, no more studying late, spending weekends on a computer, making calls, my neighbours think I escaped a psychiatric, after hearing voices at night TEST VOICEMAIL FOR HQ PHONE 1 and my personal favourite YOUR POSITION IN QUEUE IS :) I would like to transmit a very special thank you to IPExpert, and especially Vik Malhi. He's definitely made difference for me as a trainer. Just when you think you know it all about something, he would come up with something to prove me wrong, to show me the gaps in my knowledge I didn't know existed. Thank you Vik! Thanks to everyone on this forum too, there are many good people on the forum, with big knowledge, and more importantly willing to share it. It was big fun, I enjoyed the process a lot. By the way, I made it technically on my first attempt. Well, I payed once only, although I went to exam 3 times. 1st time, technical problems, Cisco gave me free retake voucher, 2nd time, again technical problems, again free voucher. To be honest after so many free retakes, I'm not even sure if I really passed, or I was costing them too much so they decided to give it to me :-), good samaritans these cisco guys. Wish you all good luck, and don't get frustrated, and most importantly have fun. Regards, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can i Daisy Chain phones of Different device pool
That shouldn't be a problem... Device Pool has nothing to do with daisy chain unless you're testing device mobility. In that situation it all depends if the switchports support dot1q so that PC port and Switch port reside on different VLANs. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Experts, Please i will like to know if i can daisy chain phones of different Device pools. Thanks for you assistance. Regards Pithog oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX server install issue VMWARE
Hi Michael, I had the same problem, try searching the web for W2K3 WA. Once you have done this, make sure to get a snapshot of your clean installation so you don't have to do it again in case you are practicing integration. I think since validation can't validate your server; you still have to activate it. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Michael Dietrich mdd2...@gmail.com wrote: Installing on ESXi I have installed base MS Server 2003 from Cisco IPT OS Disk Win SVr 2003 Teleco Svr App SW 3.0 1-4 CPU Product Key : QW438-46P6G-MHXTB-99XGG-XX7CG using as base OS for UCCX 7 install for CCIE-V home lab Problem is when I try to activate the server key (microsoft) it will not activate...I have internet access on the 2003 Server VM Anyone else run into this issue? thanks, Michael ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] E1 Controller Card
Are you able to type the card type e1 command? Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Rafay Aslam rafayc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I have my CCIE Voice lab @ home, last night when I booted my router, my E1 controller card did not show up in my Br2 Configuration, nor I can see any lights on controller itself, show inventory does show I have E1 Controller card but it disappear from my configuration, I can not even do controller E1 XXXx I have installed the card in another port, no luck! I am thinking my card is dead, its time to buy another one, but if you have any troubleshooting steps I am all ears. Regards ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFwdALL on SRST - CME / CUE
Don't take it personal; he just asked you to do what you were supposed to do from the beginning. Want better answers? That's simple, ask better questions. The same way you felt with his answer I felt with your question. We're all looking for the same goal; nobody is testing people here, that's the Lab proctor's task. Do you have any debug output so we can share knowledge while keeping a focused troubleshooting? Guessing will lead to an useless email chain and unfixed problem. In other words, help us help you. If you do not know what debugs you should run; well ask for them and we will be happy to provide you with the document you need to read. Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Randall, Thanks for reply, however it would be nice if you use some kind words. this is a sharing info and knowledge exchange forum /group. If you know an answer you are welcome and appreciated to share, if you want to test me or other members this is not the place. Wish you the best. Regards, Wael Agina On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.comwrote: I think Amit is on the right track. Wael, how do you assume that CUE is not sending the original DNIS information? What type of debug do you use to confirm or reject your assumption? Not sure how long you have been studying, but you have to practice on troubleshooting as well. I don't want to give you the answer here, but let's use this example to exercise on what would you check? Can you share the output that you would use? On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Amit, Thanks. I tried it, but not working. I think CME is not fwding the original dnis info to the cue, so it plays greeting of last called number. Is there any other idea ? Regards, Wael Agina On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:02 PM, amit batra batraji...@yahoo.comwrote: try voicemail mailbox-selection original-called command on the config mode of CUE module.. Regards Amit -- *From:* Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:58 PM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFwdALL on SRST - CME / CUE Dear All, I have BR2 in SRST abd all voicemail is OK, CUE is working fine with BR2 in SRST. All phone2 br2 ph1, ph2 4001/4002 can send and recieve vm messages. However i set CFA on 4001 to CFwdALL to 4002, now when call from pstn, the cue run vm greeting of 4002 not 4001. ALso if 4002 is CFwdALL to 4001, any caller to 4002 have call fwd to 4001 and hears 4001 VM greeting, not 4002. I think we should have some kind of options on CUE to take care of redirecting number as i need to hear the redirecting VM greeting ? Any Idea ? -- Thanks and Best Regards, Wael Agina ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Thanks and Best Regards, Wael Agina ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 -- Thanks and Best Regards, Wael Agina ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Speed Dials
Dear Deepak, If the following link does not help you, try posting your question at Cisco's support community. This is the wrong place. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmespeed.html#wp1044566 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Deepak sidana sidana_dee...@yahoo.comwrote: Dear All, One of my client is using CME 7.0 they need that the phone user can manage their speed dial from the phone. I have checked the CME admin guide, but could't find much info. Do we need to create any specific url to acheive this. below is the config of my telephony-services. telephony-service em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0 max-ephones 10 max-dn 14 ip source-address 192.168.1.10 port 2000 url directories http://192.168.1.10/localdirectory max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult directory entry 1 1001 name user1 create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00 ThanksRgds Deepak Sidana. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Update - STill not working --- Re: CFwdALL on SRST - CME / CUE
Nice output. As you can see CME is sending an INVITE to CUE with Diversion 4002 which is the last redirecting number. Would you please try this command on dial-peer sending the call to CUE *mailbox-selection* *orig-called-num *and let us know how it goes? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_m1ht.html#wp1029669 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote: Dears, I repeated the scenario and used the command voicemail mailbox-selection original-called on CUE, but still CUE running the 4002 vm not called no 4001 below is deb isd and deb ccsip message Call is 911 --- 4001 CFWDALL --- 4002 CUE VM *Is there any command needed on CME to forward orginal called no. to CUE* I dont see CME forward the original numer 4001 to CUE, it just forward new called redirected no 4002. SC-R3# Aug 20 11:34:04.273: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x008D Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Progress Ind i = 0x8583 - Origination address is non-ISDN Display i = 'Emergency Services' Calling Party Number i = 0x0080, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x80, '24044001' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Aug 20 11:34:04.273: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Received SETUP callref = 0x808D callID = 0x000D switch = primary-ni interface = User SC-R3# Aug 20 11:34:04.289: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Aug 20 11:34:04.313: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available SC-R3# SC-R3# SC-R3# SC-R3# Aug 20 11:34:13.325: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: INVITE sip:4500@10.10.202.2:5060 SIP/2.0 Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:34:13 GMT Call-Info: sip:10.10.202.1:5060 ;method=NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000 Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER From: Emergency Services sip:911@10.10.202.1;tag=8DE55C-118B Allow-Events: kpml, telephone-event Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat Min-SE: 1800 Diversion: sip:4002@10.10.202.1 ;privacy=off;reason=no-answer;counter=1;screen=no Remote-Party-ID: Emergency Services sip:911@10.10.202.1 ;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=off Cisco-Guid: 701090686-3394703840-2166858313-2897629234 Timestamp: 1313840053 Content-Length: 187 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x To: sip:4500@10.10.202.2 Contact: sip:911@10.10.202.1:5060 Expires: 180 Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Type: application/sdp Call-ID: 29CA67A6-CA5711E0-812AA249-ACB65032@10.10.202.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK46C74 CSeq: 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 3375 837 IN IP4 10.10.202.1 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.202.1 t=0 0 m=audio 17030 RTP/AVP 0 c=IN IP4 10.10.202.1 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=ptime:20 Aug 20 11:34:13.333: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK46C74 To: sip:4500@10.10.202.2;tag=cuef2922481 From: Emergency Services sip:911@10.10.202.1;tag=8DE55C-118B Call-ID: 29CA67A6-CA5711E0-812AA249-ACB65032@10.10.202.1 CSeq: 101 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Timestamp: 1313840053 Contact: sip:4500@10.10.202.2:5060 Aug 20 11:34:13.385: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK46C74 To: sip:4500@10.10.202.2;tag=cuef2922481 From: Emergency Services sip:911@10.10.202.1;tag=8DE55C-118B Call-ID: 29CA67A6-CA5711E0-812AA249-ACB65032@10.10.202.1 CSeq: 101 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Contact: sip:4500@10.10.202.2:5060 Aug 20 11:34:13.409: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK46C74 To: sip:4500@10.10.202.2;tag=cuef2922481 From: Emergency Services sip:911@10.10.202.1;tag=8DE55C-118B Call-ID: 29CA67A6-CA5711E0-812AA249-ACB65032@10.10.202.1 CSeq: 101 INVITE Content-Length: 176 Contact: sip:4500@10.10.202.2:5060 Content-Type: application/sdp Call-Info: sip:10.10.202.2:5060 ;method=NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000 Allow-Events: telephone-event v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 3234 3234 IN IP4 10.10.202.2 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.202.2 t=0 0 m=audio 16896 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000 a=ptime:20 Aug 20 11:34:13.417: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: ACK sip:4500@10.10.202.2:5060 SIP/2.0 Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Dial Rules and +Dialing
John, I can't find the plus sign as a valid character; what if you just use * as a wildcard? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmcfg/b03sdial.html#wp1052731 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: Do SIP Rules support +Dialing? For example if I have the following SIP Dial Rule: ** ** Pattern - \+1212……. Timeout – 0 ** ** On a SIP phone missed calls shows +12123945001. If I try to dial this number I have to wait for the interdigit timeout. It seems to ignore the \+1212……. pattern I created. ** ** All my other non +Dial patterns work just fine (i.e. 5…). ** ** Is this normal or have I got something mis-configured? ** ** John ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab6 new lab
Today's moral after reading this message.. Lab + # in subject = just a waste of time or aka troll. Please do not use the study list to share this information; you're just not doing any good by letting us know how big the test was or how complex you believe it is. I already know how big and complex they are (I've tried it twice). What you can learn from your experience is that you are just not prepared to take it. On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:06 PM, jason jaso...@rediffmail.com wrote: hi guys, I failed my lab and got lab 6 it is really bad feelings for me, because i went for the first attempt and got new lab and this time again new lab ): Very upset for the same, lot of new features lab is so big i am sure no one can complete it for sure, Best of luck guys for the attempt regards Jason http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle? Treat yourself at a restaurant, spa, resort and much more with *Rediff Deal ho jaye!http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=mailsignature___cmp=signaturelnk=rediffmailsignaturenewservice=deals * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] paging with CallManager 7
Don't you worry boys... I know if we behave Santa Claus will program it for us... LOL On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote: the release still coming over in the few next weeks,the release notes for that version is not yet published . Ash On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Mark Reed marklr...@gmail.com wrote: Where did you see that? I looked at the 8.6 release notes and don't see that feature. On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Erwan , Paging Feature will be available on the latest 8.6 CCM Version , Ash On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote: hi all, does call manager 7 have paging feature we can use ? for basic paging tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Thanks, Mark L Reed Home: 260-637-1585 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
