Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
On 10/17/2016 5:20 PM, Phil Townsend Lontz wrote: ... I eq the crap out of the K3 after 8K and set the tone of my CW note to 440… Near a natural “C”. to me that sounds easy and warm. When did this musical standard get changed? I've always tuned to A440. Guess I'll need to tune all my guitars differently from now on... ;>) Cheers, Gus KB0YH __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
OK, I know this thread is getting too long, but… When my beloved Grado SR-60 headphones died, I used my Yamaha CM-500 phones for music. They were terrible. Not even good enough. So I ordered Grado SR-225e phones. And the cord for the SR-60 phones is part of my PTT hand switch. The CM-500 phones are back with the ham rig. In general, good hi-fi reproducers should be good communications reproducers. wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Doug Person wrote: > > I definitely agree with using good quality headphones for optimal listening. > But, headphones are a different psycho-acoustical experience than a speaker > system. Personally, I prefer to listen to a speaker system. Headphones VS: > Speaker system will be different for everyone. But, if you prefer speakers, i > recommend decent quality components to give you the best your "K" brand > transceiver can deliver. > > Doug -- K0DXV > > > On 10/17/16 9:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote: >> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: >>> Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. >> >> When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near >> field. That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the >> loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the >> loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios >> have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for >> exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room. >> >>> I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! >> >> Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening >> environments. >> >> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote: >>> A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly >>> adjusted radio with a good microphone. >> >> All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of >> headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent >> choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, >> widely available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG >> contest weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear >> piece to your ear). >> >> 73, Jim K9YC >> >> __ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
I definitely agree with using good quality headphones for optimal listening. But, headphones are a different psycho-acoustical experience than a speaker system. Personally, I prefer to listen to a speaker system. Headphones VS: Speaker system will be different for everyone. But, if you prefer speakers, i recommend decent quality components to give you the best your "K" brand transceiver can deliver. Doug -- K0DXV On 10/17/16 9:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near field. That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room. I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening environments. On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote: A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted radio with a good microphone. All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, widely available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG contest weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear piece to your ear). 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Thanks, Wayne. This thread has been very interesting! 73 Matt NQ6N/9 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Our entire product line emphasizes portability, so we'll just have to > continue the never-ending search for 12 volt mojo. (Note: the new Upgrade > is a case of this; IMD is improved when running from lower voltages.) > > Stick with Elecraft and minimize your carbon footprint! > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > > On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin wrote: > > > >> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because > >> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do > >> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the > >> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the > K3(s) > >> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) > out in > >> the sticks...ever...save Field Day? > >> > > > > Oh yeah. > > > > "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat > > dissipation even fit in the same space? OK. Everybody ready to go out > and > > buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies > > is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M 35A@28VDC is 380 > > dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case? > > > > And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything > > else from the 28V? > > > > Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee > > change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping. > > > > What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay > out > > all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item > plan. > > It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." > > > > 73, Guy K2AV > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to m...@nq6n.com > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Our entire product line emphasizes portability, so we'll just have to continue the never-ending search for 12 volt mojo. (Note: the new Upgrade is a case of this; IMD is improved when running from lower voltages.) Stick with Elecraft and minimize your carbon footprint! 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 17, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin wrote: > >> The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because >> everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do >> better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the >> desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) >> is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in >> the sticks...ever...save Field Day? >> > > Oh yeah. > > "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat > dissipation even fit in the same space? OK. Everybody ready to go out and > buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies > is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M 35A@28VDC is 380 > dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case? > > And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything > else from the 28V? > > Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee > change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping. > > What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out > all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan. > It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." > > 73, Guy K2AV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
Love the the Ety's in the ear with the custom ear molds. They are very comfortable too. And block out EVERY THING! What me worry? > On Oct 17, 2016, at 9:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > >> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: >> Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. > > When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near field. > That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the > loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the > loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios > have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for > exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room. > >> I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! > > Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening > environments. > >> On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote: >> A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted >> radio with a good microphone. > > All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of > headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent > choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, widely > available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG contest > weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear piece to > your ear). > > 73, Jim K9YC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to phi...@mac.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
I worked with someone who had two sound-absorbing pillars in the corners of his office. Of course, he’d just recorded his 8th or 11th album, depending on how you count, and he’d produced the latest one. Mitch Easter was busy this time. I’m not nearly that picky and have some hearing loss by now, but I still miss my baby Magnaplanars (SMGa). Need to write up my cheap-ham amp & speaker setup after I have a few more miles on it. wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Oct 17, 2016, at 8:15 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > > On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: >> Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. > > When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near field. > That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the > loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the > loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios > have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for > exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room. > >> I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! > > Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening > environments. > > On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote: >> A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted >> radio with a good microphone. > > All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of > headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent > choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, widely > available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG contest > weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear piece to > your ear). > > 73, Jim K9YC > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
On Mon,10/17/2016 7:56 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. When you're sitting right in front of a loudspeaker you're in its near field. That causes what you hear to be dominated by direct sound from the loudspeaker. The loudspeaker(s) excites the room, but you're so close to the loudspeaker that you don't hear the room response. Most recording studios have a pair of high quality loudspeakers mounted on top of the console for exactly that purpose. They also have a larger pair that DOES excite the room. I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! Anechoic chambers are TEST environments, they are lousy listening environments. On Mon,10/17/2016 7:26 PM, Doug Person wrote: A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted radio with a good microphone. All it takes for excellent receive sound quality is a decent pair of headphones. The CM500, Sony MDR7506, and Etymotic Research ER4 are excellent choices. There are other good choices, but these are well established, widely available, and not expensive. All are VERY comfortable for LOOONG contest weekends (although comfort in the ER4 depends on matching the ear piece to your ear). 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Wayne, Is there a way to do this " at home" ? Since I´m in Sweden it might not be practical to send the radio all the way to California for this. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- On 2016-10-17 02:25, Wayne Burdick wrote: Knut, The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no charge. 73, Wayne N6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
Of course the room in which the speaker is used has a huge effect too. I dread to think we'd require anechoic chambers for Hamshacks! 73 Ron AC7AC -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug Person Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 7:27 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range? Wow Phil, right on. My first career was a buyer for an audio chain. I listened to everything they brought in. My assistant and my secretary and I NEVER agreed on what system sounded best. I would think a speaker that is reasonably flat from 200 hz to maybe 5khz with low mechanical distortion and good power handling would provide a decent baseline. After that - your warm tones are my screeching trebles; your full bass is my headache- inducing low range. I use a quality, small bookshelf speaker and then use the K3's equalizer to make the sound fill into the peaks and valleys of my ear's response curve. $50 would probably net you a pair of small Sony, Polk, KLH, JBL or even Pyle. New or used - you can't beat a nice rigid box with a woofer and a tweeter. Other interesting options are line-out to a Bluetooth audio source and then to one of the many Bluetooth wireless speaker systems. Or to a small stereo hifi amplifier. The K3 has stereo line output - a nice pair of bookshelf speakers left and right would definitely give you the best sound the K3/K3s is capable of producing (especially the K3s or an upgraded K3). A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted radio with a good microphone. There is a very broad range in the quality of signals on HF SSB. From dreadful to beautiful. I recommend setting up your station for the very best receive quality your radio can produce - which in the case of the K3, is substantial. Doug -- K0DXV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
Wow Phil, right on. My first career was a buyer for an audio chain. I listened to everything they brought in. My assistant and my secretary and I NEVER agreed on what system sounded best. I would think a speaker that is reasonably flat from 200 hz to maybe 5khz with low mechanical distortion and good power handling would provide a decent baseline. After that - your warm tones are my screeching trebles; your full bass is my headache- inducing low range. I use a quality, small bookshelf speaker and then use the K3's equalizer to make the sound fill into the peaks and valleys of my ear's response curve. $50 would probably net you a pair of small Sony, Polk, KLH, JBL or even Pyle. New or used - you can't beat a nice rigid box with a woofer and a tweeter. Other interesting options are line-out to a Bluetooth audio source and then to one of the many Bluetooth wireless speaker systems. Or to a small stereo hifi amplifier. The K3 has stereo line output - a nice pair of bookshelf speakers left and right would definitely give you the best sound the K3/K3s is capable of producing (especially the K3s or an upgraded K3). A good audio setup will amaze you when you talk to another properly adjusted radio with a good microphone. There is a very broad range in the quality of signals on HF SSB. From dreadful to beautiful. I recommend setting up your station for the very best receive quality your radio can produce - which in the case of the K3, is substantial. Doug -- K0DXV On 10/17/2016 4:20 PM, Phil Townsend Lontz wrote: I have spent may years in “hi end” audio… some building some selling some just fooling around. Does wire matter? is there a difference between tubes and soild state? Can I hear 20K? does it matter if I can’t hear 20K? Why build a wide band amp if you can hear it? All these questions really don't matter one bit. The ONLY question the listener need ask… Do I LIKE how it sounds? That's it folks, no more no less. Simplistic… yep sure is. A few years back I was attending an audio show in Denver with a few “audio” friends. We would typically visit different rooms together and give a listen to the various systems in each room. To my surprise, we all had different ideas about what system sounded good. I like room 990 but Glen said it sucked. He liked the system in 512 but to me it nearly drove me to drinking. Chris loved 234 but the rest of us were sure he was ready for the funny farm. We all “hear” differently… I love how my K3 sounds with high end speakers left and right side... and a fine digital amp that drives the speakers. I eq the crap out of the K3 after 8K and set the tone of my CW note to 440… Near a natural “C”. to me that sounds easy and warm. But to my old ears the best tone in the world was and is a fine old Drake or a Collins pure analog signal run thru a nice 8" alnico speaker in an open baffle. That, to me, is simply the best. Phil K5SSR Santa Fe __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to d...@k0dxv.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] SVGA/P3 Question -Waterfall Height Problem
I do not have this problem, and I have P3/SVGA. Do you have all the latest production firmware? Or have you installed a beta? 73, Guy K2AV On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Irwin Darack wrote: > I have a P3 with the SVGA board installed + an external monitor. > > SVGA Monitor Height = Main > P3 = 30 > > When ever I turn on the P3 (and monitor), I need to reset the Waterfall > Height. The Height is fine on the P3, but takes up 3/4 of the screen on > the external monitor. The P3 remembers the original Height setting. To > reset the Waterfall Height on the external monitor, I need to go to the P3 > Waterfall Height, make any change in the Height value, and then the > Waterfall Height on the external monitor corrects itself. Not sure why the > External Monitor requires this and if it has something to do with the > P3 SVGA board or a monitor setting? > > Thanks, Irwin KD3TB > > > > > -- > Irwin KD3TB > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to k2av@gmail.com > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kevin wrote: > The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because > everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do > better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the > desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) > is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in > the sticks...ever...save Field Day? > Oh yeah. "Just" change the supply voltage. AND the PA. And would that much heat dissipation even fit in the same space? OK. Everybody ready to go out and buy a 28 volt power supply for the new K3S? The range of 12 volt supplies is way, way broader than 28 volt. The Astron LS35M 35A@28VDC is 380 dollars. Oh, a built-in? Where does it go in the case? And does the K3S add an internal inverter to produce 12V for everything else from the 28V? Lot of expense for a small improvement that they can get with a freebee change to a late developing gift improvement for the cost of shipping. What would be a practical way to actually introduce such a change? Lay out all the specifics involved. Let's see your critical path item by item plan. It's cheep and easy to just blurt out "they oughta go to 28 volts." 73, Guy K2AV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Well one of the main reasons I love my K3S is because of weight (or lack of it). Due to back problems, I cant move that 40-50 pound rig to the bench to do any adjustments, repair, etc. I can take my K3S to the beach house with ease and have a nice 100 watt radio. Each of us has their own needs and wants in a radio and a 60 pound monster with 200 watts and built in power supply for 48 -60 volts, may not be one of them. Jim K4JAF -Original Message- From: Kevin Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 6:47 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with. The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day? Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know where I can rent a mule? On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to jcox...@bellsouth.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Hmm, compliance with what? The rig meets Elecraft specs and since the FCC doesn't regulate TX IMD there is nothing to comply with. The problem I have is accepting the status quo by Elecraft. Just because everybody else is around -30dB shouldn't mean Elecraft stop trying to do better. Let the portable/backpacking rigs use 12V MOSFETS and switch the desktop model K3(s) to higher voltage finals. Yeah, yeah, I know, the K3(s) is supposed to be portable capable. How many people take their K3(s) out in the sticks...ever...save Field Day? Just because it has a carry strap doesn't mean it's a portable rig. My TS-520 has a beautiful leather strap. It weighs 37 pounds. Anybody know where I can rent a mule? On 10/17/2016 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
I have spent may years in “hi end” audio… some building some selling some just fooling around. Does wire matter? is there a difference between tubes and soild state? Can I hear 20K? does it matter if I can’t hear 20K? Why build a wide band amp if you can hear it? All these questions really don't matter one bit. The ONLY question the listener need ask… Do I LIKE how it sounds? That's it folks, no more no less. Simplistic… yep sure is. A few years back I was attending an audio show in Denver with a few “audio” friends. We would typically visit different rooms together and give a listen to the various systems in each room. To my surprise, we all had different ideas about what system sounded good. I like room 990 but Glen said it sucked. He liked the system in 512 but to me it nearly drove me to drinking. Chris loved 234 but the rest of us were sure he was ready for the funny farm. We all “hear” differently… I love how my K3 sounds with high end speakers left and right side... and a fine digital amp that drives the speakers. I eq the crap out of the K3 after 8K and set the tone of my CW note to 440… Near a natural “C”. to me that sounds easy and warm. But to my old ears the best tone in the world was and is a fine old Drake or a Collins pure analog signal run thru a nice 8" alnico speaker in an open baffle. That, to me, is simply the best. Phil K5SSR Santa Fe __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Charlie, You hit the nail on the head. Mark Musick, WB9CIF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Charlie T, K3ICH Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:04 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people. VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec. However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the market. THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER than the typical radio for this parameter. AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping. Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A" model and leave it at that. And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a retraction. I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Rogers Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to markmus...@sbcglobal.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
Seems I can't go wrong with Elecraft, Phonema or Palstar speakers, assuming the wallet factor is a near-draw at too expensive :-) -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Speakers-Optimal-Frequency-Range-tp7623428p7623471.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] SVGA/P3 Question -Waterfall Height Problem
I have a P3 with the SVGA board installed + an external monitor. SVGA Monitor Height = Main P3 = 30 When ever I turn on the P3 (and monitor), I need to reset the Waterfall Height. The Height is fine on the P3, but takes up 3/4 of the screen on the external monitor. The P3 remembers the original Height setting. To reset the Waterfall Height on the external monitor, I need to go to the P3 Waterfall Height, make any change in the Height value, and then the Waterfall Height on the external monitor corrects itself. Not sure why the External Monitor requires this and if it has something to do with the P3 SVGA board or a monitor setting? Thanks, Irwin KD3TB -- Irwin KD3TB __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Jim, Your new rig had nothing "defective." It was "in compliance" when you bought it. Subsequent to your buying it, that particular in-compliance specification has been improved. There is nothing for Elecraft to fix because there is nothing broken. No warranty extends to future improvements. Be thankful Elecraft is offering that improvement at no charge. 73, Kent K9ZTV > On Oct 17, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: > > I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat > similar to the VW diesel problem. > > Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with > specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of > time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in > compliance, into compliance. > > I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, > modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you > the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective > boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly > and re-assembly. > > Jim, W4ATK > > K-line, K2 > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to k9...@socket.net > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Jim, Elecraft sold you a K3S that *was* in compliance and will still be if you do nothing. See Wayne's post yesterday. They improved the Transmit IMD for the current K3S and are offering to make that change to older K3S. They are going out of their way to add the change to your K3S free of labor charge - all you have to pay for is the shipping. I think that is above and beyond the call of duty. I have not heard of another ham manufacturer that would do anything like that. 73, Don W3FPR On 10/17/2016 4:41 PM, Jim Rogers wrote: Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Hear, Hear! Bob/AA6VB Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Monday, October 17, 2016, 4:03 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote: Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people. VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec. However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the market. THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER than the typical radio for this parameter. AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping. Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A" model and leave it at that. And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a retraction. I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Rogers Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to bobchor...@yahoo.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Now, I may be miss-interpreting what's happening here, but I feel is that this whole thing is being taken "slightly" wrong by several people. VW purposely faked the test to meet a gov't spec. However, Elecraft sold a radio that DID meet their published specifications for transmit IMD which are typical of other competitive radios on the market. THEN, they figured out a way to make an improvement, which makes them BETTER than the typical radio for this parameter. AND, they're willing to make the mod for free IF you handle shipping. Believe me, the "big-three" would simply come out with a Mark II, or "A" model and leave it at that. And, every time I hear that they did in fact do just that, I'm that much gladder (if that's a word) I have Elecraft's in the shack. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll hear about. At which point I would offer a retraction. I have been known to stick my foot in my mouth on more than one occasion. 73, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Rogers Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:42 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
I have been a loyal Elecrafter for many years, and this seems to be somewhat similar to the VW diesel problem. Elecraft has sold me a radio specifying it to be in compliance with specifications of IMD. Now you are telling me that I must bear the burden of time and expense to bring the device you specified and guaranteed to be in compliance, into compliance. I built mine from a kit, so Elecraft you send me the necessary boards, modules, whatever to bring my K3s into compliance and I will return to you the defective boards,, modules, whatever. Then you can rework the defective boards for the next exchange. I will spend the time and effort of disassembly and re-assembly. Jim, W4ATK K-line, K2 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Speakers - Optimal Frequency Range?
Your logic is good, as usual. But let's look at the physics of loudspeakers, which I tried to do on an earlier post. A SMALL diaphragm has better dispersion of high frequencies, while it doesn't produce loud bass. We don't need loud bass, so a GOOD small diaphragm loudspeaker is what we need. And that is EXACTLY what Elecraft uses in the K2 and both versions of the K3. The late Dick Heyser famously said that "trying to describe an audio device or system using only frequency response is like trying to write Shakespeare with only one word in your vocabulary. In addition, to have any meaning, a frequency response spec must include +/- dB limits and it must include angular dispersion. VERY few consumer loudspeakers do that -- they simply quote upper and lower limits. Many cheap loudspeakers (and headphones) have very bumpy frequency response, and those bumps create phase distortion that degrades speech intelligibility. So, to repeat my earlier advice, the best loudspeaker for ham radio is one that has smooth response from about 300 Hz to about 3 kHz and has wide, uniform dispersion within those limits. In other words, it sounds the same both on and off axis. Loudspeakers that cover a wider frequency range are FINE, but don't pay extra to get one. A loudspeaker with wider response would reproduce lower lows and higher highs, but our ham rigs (at least the good ones when well adjusted) limit audio to a range of about 300 - 3,000 Hz in the IF. There is no good reason to buy a speaker rated for 300 - 3,000 Hz. What we want is one with good performance within that range, and most that do will have at least another octave or two above and below those limits. (An octave is 2:1 frequency) BTW -- I purposely set my RXEQ flat because I primarily work CW, and I want to hear the off-frequency signals that may be very low or very high in frequency, and I limit frequency response on SSB with the settings of my IF filters. 73, Jim K9YC On Sun,10/16/2016 10:44 PM, Dave Cole wrote: So, as I said in my original post, it is the most efficient use of the hardware is to use a limited response speaker. No need for high end stereo speakers on a K3... That said, I may put on some better speakers on my K3 because in the long run it is a bit less stressful on my ears...:) __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] FOR SALE
K3 -100 in mint condition with included power supply, mike, outboard speaker, Bencher paddle and keyboard capability with outboard Hamgadgets Master Keyer and blue tooth connected keyboard. E mail for more details and pix. Bill Hartman n...@aol.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] K3S QST Article
How about a user adjustable amplifier on set point? In my case there is a 2 watt jump when going from 12 to 13 watts and if a person wanted a smoother output in that range for an amp or whatever it would be possible. John KK9A from: Wayne Burdick n6kr Wes, This would be a simple firmware change, and it might be worth considering. But typically we see -30 dBc or better at 12 W in production with the latest revisions. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 15, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Wes Stewart wrote: > ….I would recommend that Elecraft change firmware to set the max power out at 10W (LP) and switch in the KPA100 above 10W, not 12. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] CW message record in KX3
I am trying to record a CW message in KX3. I push REC, then number, use KXPD3 and than tap MSG to finish. This works well when I program a callsign (e.g., NO9E). When I program a message (e.g., CQ CQ de NO9E NO9E), it seems that the message is recorded but it does not play. Pushing few buttons bring a "chain" message. What am I doing wrong? Programming messages from a computer works well. Ignacy, NO9E -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/CW-message-record-in-KX3-tp7623461.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S PA Upgrade
Jim, Contact support to get all the latest information on the upgrade and start the process for sending it in. 73, Don W3FPR On 10/17/2016 8:50 AM, Jim Finan wrote: Has the mechanism for the K3S returns been set up yet? I suppose turn-around time also needs clarification too. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article
Has the mechanism for the K3S returns been set up yet? I suppose turn-around time also needs clarification too. Not many manufacturers would do this sort of upgrade, let alone for 'free'. Thanks! 73, Jim Jim Finan AB4AC Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Original Message From: Wayne Burdick Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 8:26 PM To: ab2tc Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S QST Article Knut, The K3S as originally shipped does not have a design flaw. Like virtually all 12-V-class transceivers using currently available MOSFETs, it was already right around -30 dBc or better, worst-case, for 3rd-order IMD. We simply found a way to make it better by a few dB, and we're offering to make this upgrade at no charge. 73, Wayne N6KR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to jimfi...@att.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] let's not drag apostrophes into this
I want to formally apologize for bringing up this thread which appears to be going on forever. Due to an oversight on my part, it was completely unnecessary anyway. If you want to comment further send your "slings & arrows" directly to me and stop subjecting everyone to a truly "OT" thread. Thanks, Charlie k3ICH -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Charles Yahrling Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 6:04 AM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] lets not drag apostrophes into this "Due to the odd way Elecraft chose to label the new K3s, I would request that when referring to multiple radios, use the terms K3's or K3s' rather than simply K3s which implies a single radio." Please. let us not fall into the improper use of the apostrophe that is so common these days. One example above is correct for he possessive, as in " the K3's output on 10M is" For plural, "we both brought our K3s to Field Day." The term K3s' (or K3S') has no valid meaning, grammatically speaking. You'd need to write "the K3S's output on 10M is" for the possessive. And probably " we both brought our new K3Ses to Field Day" One we get that fixed, we can work on eliminating "Comprised of" ;^} __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to pin...@erols.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] [K3] WTB:KAT500
Hi, I am looking for used Elecraft KAT500 in 100% conditions to complete my K3 line and use the KPA500 safely. Many thanks for kind offers or tips. 73 - Petr, OK1RP http://ok1rp.blogspot.com - http://ok1rp.blogspot.com -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-WTB-KAT500-tp7623456.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] (K3) APF and selected bandwidth
(BTW I wrote the following ~3 years ago before APF was changed from HOLD to TAP on DUAL PB): ## I use APF virtually all the time and never use RIT, SHIFT, etc. Just HOLD DUAL PB to actuate APF and use the VFO to zero beat. COARSE (10 Hz) VFO steps is usually close enough but you can switch to FINE (1 Hz) if necessary for ultra weak signals. I also strongly endorse N6KR's suggestion below: "I suggest setting the passband width to about 250-300 Hz when using APF." This is extremely important since bandwidths too narrow will introduce additional ringing to the APF which already borders on ringing. I actually use a 200 Hz XFIL but set to actuate at DSP 400 Hz. With WIDTH set to 400 Hz, the signal first goes through the relatively broad (4.0 shape factor) 200 Hz XFIL, then a 400 Hz DSP and finally the narrow APF. This makes the cascaded XFIL/DSP seem more like 250 Hz, reduces ringing, still allows you to hear off-frequency callers (although attenuated) and helps your ears discriminate weak signals from noise by providing a wider background sample of noise. ### The last phrase "helps your ears discriminate weak signals from noise by providing a wider background sample of noise" is key. Narrower bandwidths are not best for the human ear/brain...no matter what theory says about narrower bandwidths having better S/N. 73, Bill W4ZV -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-APF-and-selected-bandwidth-tp7623407p7623455.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] lets not drag apostrophes into this
"Due to the odd way Elecraft chose to label the new K3s, I would request that when referring to multiple radios, use the terms K3's or K3s' rather than simply K3s which implies a single radio." Please. let us not fall into the improper use of the apostrophe that is so common these days. One example above is correct for he possessive, as in " the K3's output on 10M is" For plural, "we both brought our K3s to Field Day." The term K3s' (or K3S') has no valid meaning, grammatically speaking. You'd need to write "the K3S's output on 10M is" for the possessive. And probably " we both brought our new K3Ses to Field Day" One we get that fixed, we can work on eliminating "Comprised of" ;^} __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com