Re: [Elecraft] [KX3/PX3] Bonding

2016-06-05 Thread Fred Moore
much noise comes from and iMac from the USB cables, beads will greatly
reduce the noise... Fred


On 6/5/16 9:35 AM, John wrote:
> Can’t do that - with the iMac the power supply is built in…it’s an 
> all-in-one. 
>
>
>
>
> On 5 Jun 2016, at 2:42 PM, Buck via Elecraft <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
> Here is the authority on the issue. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf
>
> Have you put ferrite on the cables from the iMac and the switching power 
> supply?
>
> You've used "star" grounding around the KX3.  Try bonding everything to 
> everything - you want to provide a low-impedance parallel path from case to 
> case everywhere there is a connection. So, there should be a bond between the 
> soundcard and the iMac and the soundcard and power supply.   Also the iMac 
> and soundcard to the PX3.  Your diagram should look more like a spider web.
>
> Are the interconnecting cables grounded to the chassis or the circuit board?  
> You'll have to open some things up and see if there is the "pin 1 problem" 
> where the cable's ground is on the circuit board and not the chassis.
>
> I would look for a YouTube video on how to open up that iMac.  I am sure 
> someone has posted one.
>
> K4ia
> Buck
> Honor Roll 335
> 8BDXCC
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] KX3 speaker

2016-06-21 Thread Fred Moore
Does anyone make an amplified speaker that closely matches the look and
size of the KX3 that sounds good.  Any recommendations..  thanks in
advance.. Fred


-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] RX eq

2016-05-21 Thread Fred Moore
I don't see a reference to setting the receive eq via a macro, I do see
a reference to setting the transmit eq.  Surely I am missing
something..  info please.. thanks in advance.. Fred


-- 

Fred Moore
Ham:  WD8KNI
Cell 321-217-8699
email: f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] mailman

2016-05-21 Thread Fred Moore
I have my options set to receive my own posts, but don't get them.. any
thoughts anyone..  Fred


-- 

Fred Moore
Ham:  WD8KNI
Cell 321-217-8699
email: f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] RX eq

2016-05-21 Thread Fred Moore
Well, that really sucks when you are moving between cw and other modes..
oh well, hopefully it will be added..  thanks for the reply.. Fred


On 5/21/16 11:09 AM, Nr4c wrote:
> You have not missed anything. I had hoped this would get to the top of the 
> list. 
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> ...nr4c. bill
>
>
>> On May 21, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Fred Moore <wd8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see a reference to setting the receive eq via a macro, I do see
>> a reference to setting the transmit eq.  Surely I am missing
>> something..  info please.. thanks in advance.. Fred
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Fred Moore
>> Ham:  WD8KNI
>> Cell 321-217-8699
>> email: f...@fmeco.com
>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to n...@widomaker.com

-- 

Fred Moore
Ham:  WD8KNI
Cell 321-217-8699
email: f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] RX eq

2016-05-21 Thread Fred Moore
Thanks for the input, missed the part that RxEQ was stored by mode, that
solves my problem.   I should have put KX3 in the subject, but works
same on k3 and kx3..   solved... thanks..


-- 

Fred Moore
Ham:  WD8KNI
Cell 321-217-8699
email: f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 internal battery problems

2016-05-06 Thread Fred Moore
I think you will find that one of the cells used in this series
arrangement will have a high internal resistance.  You also mentioned a
brand that I have seen the worst performance from (my personal
experience).  I have been using one of the Blue ESR meters (80 bucks)
for about 4 years to look at batteries that don't perform well, high
resistance in a cell has always been the issue.. 

Before all the engineers jump on and say there is a difference between
resistance and impedance and I don't understand, and this is not the
correct way to read internal resistance. I can say that I also
understand how to load a battery and at the same time and take a
resistance reading of the cell.  But who has the time.. I have no intent
of testing in a laboratory, when the shop is sufficient.

First off make sure you don't use any of the really expensive ESR meters
that measure the voltage first and if they see any the go into a
capacitor discharge cycle.. that would not be good. 

I simply hook the battery across the meter and read the resistance.. 
While this is not a exact laboratory measurement you can tell a lot from
the reading..  look at each cell in the string, if one is higher just
get rid if it you will see an improvement of string capacity.

As an example not long ago I had a battery pack that could last about 5
minutes after it was charged.. reading the whole pack's resistance it
showed about 9 ohms of resistance on a 14 volt pack.  opening the pack I
found two of the cells bad.. one measured 2.5 ohms the other was 3.1,
that is 4.5 ohms just from two of the batteries..  the rest were around
.85 ohms..

I have also tested thousand of SLA batteries this way, and can tell you
instantly if the battery will deliver the rated capacity.. 

from experience if a cell is more than .8 or .9 I don't use it..

Regards.. Fred

I had to post this message two time to get it to the list.. I can
honestly say this is the first time since using the internet that my
post was rejected for have a digital signature, so will have to remember
to turn it off.. 

The message's content type was not explicitly allowed




On 5/6/16 6:06 AM, LA7NO wrote:
> KX3 (ser. no. 08146) works OK on external power, but recently I am
> experiencing problem using it on internal rechargeable cells.
>
> The AA cells are relatively new Varta Professional No. 5706, 2700 mAh NiMH.
> They have been charged with a techno-line BC-1000. Measured capacity via an
> automatic discharge/recharge cycle is according to spec.
>
> I have attached a 50 Ohm dummy-load to the KX3. When turned on, it indicates
> BT 9,7V.  BAT MIN is set to 8,2V.
> When I press ATU TUNE, it turn itself off immediately.
> With TUN PWR set to 0,1W it works OK when pressing TUNE, but BT drops to
> 7,6V.
> If TUN PWR is set to 1W, it switches off when TUNE is pressed.
>
> Strange that the voltage drops so much, even if the charger indicated normal
> cell capacity when automatically discharging them.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Per-Tore / LA7NO
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KX3-internal-battery-problems-tp7617201.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wd8...@gmail.com

-- 

Fred Moore
Ham:  WD8KNI
Cell 321-217-8699
email: f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] The 1500 watt amp

2016-08-01 Thread Fred Moore
I'm with you Jer..

I always wonder that some of you guys "cost/QSO" is..  it only a hobby,
not a masculinity contest..  Many times I see a 10K station and ask how
often they operate.. many times the answer is I turn on at least once
per month to make sure it work..

Fred


On 8/1/16 9:50 AM, Jerry Moore wrote:
> I don't see the point of having a large power amp. It doesn't help receive.
> My whole Ham life I've been told to put the money into antennas, better
> feedlines, and a better receiver.
> If you are a skilled operator then you'll make the contact if band
> conditions permit. 
> Doing the math I really don't see why anyone "needs" an amp past
> 500-600watts. Maybe on 60/160? 
> If a QRP /Low power station can make the contact but you can't then maybe
> you need to ask for help getting your station optimized a bit better. 
> Just my view. 
> I used to run an SB220 and loved it when I made the contact. I later came to
> resent Ops I heard running power just to get over the pileup. 
> I sold the Amp and don't regret it for a minute. If I were to get another
> amp the math shows 500w to be the sweet spot, however, I have so much
> opportunity to improve feedlines and antenna it doesn't makes sense to run
> power at this time.
>
> Just my view. 
> Jer
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 firmware wish

2016-07-07 Thread Fred Moore
I actually like it working as it is.  When I go into data mode I don't
have to turn off the bias etc..  I think that is why it works the way it
does..  Fred


On 7/7/16 9:14 AM, John Pitz wrote:
> I would like to second that request!
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 09:39 +0200, Erlend Grimseid wrote:
>
>> When switching to data modes, the mic btn and mic bias settings in the menu
>> is disabled.
>> I use vox in some settings and have rigged a cable with ptt for my TNC.
>> Also if i forget to turn of mic bias before connecting my smartphone, the
>> phone goes crazy and thinks I'm pushing buttons on my headset.
>>
>> With the current firmware I have to go to voice mode, change settings and
>> then back to data A mode.
>>
>>
>> Would it be possible to enable changing mic settings in data mode?
>>
>> 73
>> De
>> LA4TTA
>> Erlend
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to crustac...@brig-elec.com
>>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] N1MM Logger +

2016-07-09 Thread Fred Moore
I don't have any problem running under on my Mac, running winblows 7
under parallels, have been doing this for a couple of years..  for
normal logging I use RumlogNG..  Regards.. Fred


On 7/9/16 8:11 AM, Neil Martinsen-Burrell wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2016 5:43 AM, "Dauer, Edward" <eda...@law.du.edu> wrote:
>> Unfortunately it is still not available for Mac, and the developers seem
> hesitant about using a Windows emulator on an Apple computer.  Below is a
> clip taken from the N1MM + website today.  Does anyone have any more
> current info?
>
> That is still the most current info. I would love to hear if anyone has
> made the new version of N1MM+ work under WINE, but as far as I know, no one
> has succeeded at that. The closest that anyone has come is using a full
> Windows virtual machine to run N1MM+. Dale Putnam WC7S is one person who
> has reported success with that setup.
>
> -Neil N0FN
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3/Macbook contact logging options...

2017-02-09 Thread Fred Moore
I use rumlogNG to do all of my logging on the Mac, tried many buy ended
up there.  You add a couple of variables to a button in fldigi and it
sends the info over to rumlog.   I will have to look at WSJT to see how
I did that haven't used that for some time.  Regards..  Fred


On 2/7/17 10:30 PM, Brian ve3bwp Pietrzyk wrote:
> Enjoying portable QRP phone with my new KX3. Recently began using WSJT-X and 
> Fldigi (for the declining solar cycle) with a Signalink USB/MacBook.
>
> Was using MacLoggerDX for logging phone contacts and now looking for an easy 
> way to log my digital contacts directly from Fldigi and WSJT to MacLogger or 
> other mac based logging program.
>
> If you are successfully doing this I would love to hear from you.
> Thanks
> ve3bwp
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Vehicle mount

2016-09-12 Thread Fred Moore
Brian, if you run the negative lead all the way to the battery (direct)
fuse the lead close to the battery.  If you run the negative lead to
point that ends in a frame ground do not fuse the negative lead.  This
does not conflict with standard automotive manufacture recommendations. 

Also carefully read almost all manufactures installations it says run
the leads to the battery, and they provide two fuses on in the positive
and negative lead.  I have not seen an installation manual in years that
didn't say directly to the battery..

Tom W8JI has some good explanations on they why's and how this came to be

http://www.w8ji.com/mobile_ground.htm

Regards.. Fred


On 9/12/16 9:03 AM, brian wrote:
> Don,
>
> Perhaps you can clear up an issue.
> The link below does not include fuses in the ground side.
> I thought there were some very good reasons to do so.
>
> 73 de Brian/K3KO
>
> On 9/12/2016 12:50 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>> Wayne,
>>
>> Take a look at
>> http://www.elecraft.com/manual/Rev-B1-1.6-KX3-Mobile-Owners.pdf.
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> On 9/12/2016 8:24 AM, Wayne Michael wrote:
>>> I have a 2012 Kia Sedona minivan.
>>> I currently have a FTM-400 mounted using a seat mount.
>>> Any ideas what mounts might be available to put a KX3 in the van along
>>> with the FTM-400?
>>> Anyone have experience with the KX3 mobile in a car?  Worth the effort?
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to als...@comcast.net
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 SDR MAC

2016-09-14 Thread Fred Moore
I am aware it doesn't require any SDR software, but wanted to play with
some.. primary for a panadapter, without adding on a PX3..  I have not
looked at iSDR for ipad will take a look at it..  thanks.. Fred


On 9/14/16 2:54 PM, Michael Blake wrote:
> Fred, what is your goal?  The KX3 does not require any SDR software.
> Panadapter, try iSDR on the iPad.  If you have a PigRemote it will
> even display the KX3's frequency.  It connects to the I/Q jacks.
>
> Fill us in what functions you are looking for.
>
> Michael Blake
> k9...@mac.com <mailto:k9...@mac.com>
>
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 14:39, Fred Moore <f...@fmeco.com
> <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>> wrote:
>
>> I am looking for recommendations on a good SDR application that will run
>> under Mac OSX.   I also have parallels installed with a windows VM, but
>> don't want anything that runs under windows..
>>
>> What are you Mac users using?..   Fred
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Fred Moore
>> WD8KNI
>> email: f...@fmeco.com <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>
>>
>> phone:  321-217-8699
>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to k9...@mac.com <mailto:k9...@mac.com>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] KX3 SDR MAC

2016-09-14 Thread Fred Moore
I am looking for recommendations on a good SDR application that will run
under Mac OSX.   I also have parallels installed with a windows VM, but
don't want anything that runs under windows.. 

What are you Mac users using?..   Fred


-- 
Fred Moore
WD8KNI 
email: f...@fmeco.com
  
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 SDR MAC

2016-09-15 Thread Fred Moore
Michael,  I installed iSDR and ordered to lightning to USB adapter from
apple, it will be here tomorrow..  After ordering the adapter I started
wondering how to keep the iPad charged when it is powering the sound
device..  how do you make that happen, I could not find anything on the
web.  Do you know if plugging the iPad into a powered USB hub will
charge the iPad, as the iPad would be acting as a host hub..  nothing I
could find... 

regards... Fred


On 9/14/16 3:30 PM, Michael Blake wrote:
> Fred, If you have the PigRemote it will serve as the RS-232 connection
> from iSdr to the KX3.  If you do not then then just set the frequency
> on iSdr to 0 (zero) kHz and the frequency you are tuned to will be at
> center screen and other signals will be displayed as plus or minus
> kHz.  It works quite well… very well actually.
>
> I use an Apple camera adapter (lightning to usb) with a Griffin iMic
> to connect from the I/Q jack on the KX3 to the iPad.  It works just as
> well on the iPhone with a smaller display.
>
> If you want other stuff like CAT, Log, LOTW support,  DX-Cluster, etc.
> look at RumLog NG running on your Mac.
>
> Michael Blake
> k9...@mac.com <mailto:k9...@icloud.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Fred Moore <f...@fmeco.com
>> <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I am aware it doesn't require any SDR software, but wanted to play with
>> some.. primary for a panadapter, without adding on a PX3..  I have not
>> looked at iSDR for ipad will take a look at it..  thanks.. Fred
>>
>>
>> On 9/14/16 2:54 PM, Michael Blake wrote:
>>> Fred, what is your goal?  The KX3 does not require any SDR software.
>>> Panadapter, try iSDR on the iPad.  If you have a PigRemote it will
>>> even display the KX3's frequency.  It connects to the I/Q jacks.
>>>
>>> Fill us in what functions you are looking for.
>>>
>>> Michael Blake
>>> k9...@mac.com <mailto:k9...@mac.com> <mailto:k9...@mac.com>
>>>
>>> On Sep 14, 2016, at 14:39, Fred Moore <f...@fmeco.com
>>> <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>
>>> <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am looking for recommendations on a good SDR application that
>>>> will run
>>>> under Mac OSX.   I also have parallels installed with a windows VM, but
>>>> don't want anything that runs under windows..
>>>>
>>>> What are you Mac users using?..   Fred
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Fred Moore
>>>> WD8KNI
>>>> email: f...@fmeco.com <mailto:f...@fmeco.com> <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>
>>>>
>>>> phone:  321-217-8699
>>>>
>>>> __
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> Message delivered to k9...@mac.com <mailto:k9...@mac.com>
>>>> <mailto:k9...@mac.com>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>>> and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> -- 
>> Fred Moore
>> email: f...@fmeco.com <mailto:f...@fmeco.com>
>>   f...@safes.com <mailto:f...@safes.com>
>> phone:  321-217-8699
>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to k9...@mac.com <mailto:k9...@mac.com>
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Vehicle mount

2016-09-12 Thread Fred Moore
I will add to the conversation with a direct story relating to radio
grounds, in this case it was a sail boat...  At one time I spent much of
my life Surveying boats, another survey friend asked me to look at his
sailboat as he could not keep zinc's on the boat they would last about a
month..  An arriving throwing a silver anode over the side (in salt
water) showed about 1.75 volts between the water and his ground. So that
is why the zinc's were plating off of the boat. 

All grounds on the boat lead to a grounding plate at the foot of the
mast (42 foot).  As I was disconnecting each ground wire on the
grounding plate, suddenly the ground went away, and Lee said "the VHF
radio went dead", it was on as he was listening to the weather. 

So what had happened..  This was a case where the radio was wired
directly to the battery, with fuses in both the positive and negative
leads.  The fuse in the negative lead was indeed blown (unknown
reason).  The ground path to the radio was up the coax shield to the
masthead antenna, this antenna was DC grounded flowed then down the mast
to the ground plate. 

This connection raised the ground potential in reference to all other
grounds 1.75 volts..  and was the cause of all of the problems. 
Properly grounding the radio ground to the ground plate permanently
resolved the issue..

This was a case of small currents (radio in receive), however should a
starter have been involved as Tom (W8JI) explains the currents would
have been great and could easily have caused a fire.

My point is where ground connections are made can have consequences.. 
Regards.. Fred


On 9/12/16 9:34 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Brian,
>
> There is a lot of controversy over fuses in the ground lead.
> The reason for them dates way back to days when the battery to engine
> ground strap would commonly corrode or break.  IMHO, that was more
> common in automotive designs of the 1940s through 1980s vehicles when
> it was a piece of uninsulated braid.  I believe that connection is
> much more reliable in modern vehicles and better protected from
> exposure to the elements.
>
> The reasoning behind putting a fuse in the negative lead is that it
> will protect the radio from having current from the starter current be
> routed over the radio's ground wire paths should the battery to engine
> ground strap be faulty.
>
> BUT, there are other paths to ground that can go through the radio
> even if the fuse in the negative lead goes open - consider that the
> antenna coax shield is also connected to the vehicle body and provides
> yet another ground path.
>
> IMHO, fusing the ground lead is not necessary in modern vehicle
> installations.  In fact I recall W8JI insisting that the radio ground
> be obtained from the chassis of the vehicle instead of routing the
> ground wire all the way to the battery.  That solution eliminates the
> problem path.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
>
>
> On 9/12/2016 9:03 AM, brian wrote:
>> Don,
>>
>> Perhaps you can clear up an issue.
>> The link below does not include fuses in the ground side.
>> I thought there were some very good reasons to do so.
>>
>> 73 de Brian/K3KO
>>
>> On 9/12/2016 12:50 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>>> Wayne,
>>>
>>> Take a look at
>>> http://www.elecraft.com/manual/Rev-B1-1.6-KX3-Mobile-Owners.pdf.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Don W3FPR
>>>
>>> On 9/12/2016 8:24 AM, Wayne Michael wrote:
>>>> I have a 2012 Kia Sedona minivan.
>>>> I currently have a FTM-400 mounted using a seat mount.
>>>> Any ideas what mounts might be available to put a KX3 in the van along
>>>> with the FTM-400?
>>>> Anyone have experience with the KX3 mobile in a car?  Worth the
>>>> effort?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to als...@comcast.net
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to donw...@

Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility and RumlogNG

2016-10-09 Thread Fred Moore
Hate to reply to my own post.. but this issue is going on on MacBook Pro
(Retina 2010-2011) the fix is to reset the SMC controller..   (Shift,
CTRL, CMD + Power) hold down till the system resets..  everything seems
ok now..  hope this helps someone..


On 10/9/16 5:50 PM, Fred Moore wrote:
> Has anyone had any problem getting these programs to connect after
> upgrading OSX to Sierra?  I can't seem to get them to connect, upgraded
> last week to sierra, and today was the first time I tried it.. 
> Regards.. Fred
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Anti-static Pads

2016-09-20 Thread Fred Moore
The person who needs a piece of you mind is the Electrical Inspector who
didn't do his job Fred


On 9/20/16 10:37 AM, Terry Schieler wrote:
> Don wrote,
>
>  your house.  You can use a banana plug in the round pin of an electrical 
> receptacle, but before you trust it, get one of the receptacle testers and 
> make sure that green wire ground is intact - some are not.>
>
> I built a new home in 1996.  After living there a few years I noticed an 
> intermittent issue with an outlet on the first floor.  Upon opening up the 
> outlet box I discovered the green "safety ground" coiled up, disconnected in 
> the back of the box.  I fixed that.  Then I used a receptacle tester to 
> confirm the other outlets.  All the outlets but three on the first floor had 
> the disconnected green wire stuffed into the back of the box.  I spent a 
> weekend making them safe again.  All outlets in the rest of the house were 
> fine.  
> Hearing my experience, most people say "man I hope you gave your builder a 
> piece of your mind".  I was unable to do that as he was in federal prison at 
> the time... for fraud.  Every dog has his day.
>
> Check your receptacles.  
>
> Terry, WØFM
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Wilhelm [mailto:donw...@embarqmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 3:59 PM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Anti-static Pads
>
> Hi all,
>
> While I can state that Ron's comment about the K2 is typically true, the 
> static tolerance of thru-hole ICs and transistors is lower than it was back 
> in 1998 or even 2006 (OK, I picked those years as a guess).  Many DIP mounted 
> devices are really SMD devices with DIP leads and can be as static sensitive 
> as the devices in the K3 and KX3.
> Despite the "touch grounded metal" instruction in the K2 manual, I do see 
> some repairs come in with failed firmware ICs, and rarely, but not zero, some 
> 'normal' ICs on a new build.
> My best guess is that those parts were damaged due to a static charge.
> Whether the builder did not follow the "touch a metal ground" or not I cannot 
> tell, all I know is that it failed.
>
> When possible, use an anti-static mat and wrist strap when handling ICs and 
> transistors, especially during periods of low humidity.  Do not work on 
> carpet without them and do not wear nylon clothing - and don't shuffle your 
> feet on the floor while working.
> The minimum should be a wrist strap connected to the green-wire ground in 
> your house.  You can use a banana plug in the round pin of an electrical 
> receptacle, but before you trust it, get one of the receptacle testers and 
> make sure that green wire ground is intact - some are not.
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] KX3 Utility and RumlogNG

2016-10-09 Thread Fred Moore
Has anyone had any problem getting these programs to connect after
upgrading OSX to Sierra?  I can't seem to get them to connect, upgraded
last week to sierra, and today was the first time I tried it.. 
Regards.. Fred

-- 

Fred Moore
WD8KNI
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Windows Emulator

2016-10-12 Thread Fred Moore
I would not hesitate to go the Fusion or Parallels route..  While
parallels allows you to run each individual program inside a mac window,
fusion does not.. it runs on a separate desktop. however Fusion has many
fewer paid upgrades than parallels.  I currently run parallels, it works
very well, but have not upgraded for the last 3 OS upgrades.. because I
run windows7 for my ham programs..

I tested some VM that wasn't cusomized for the OSX and performance was
horrible, slow and cranky..

Regards.. Fred


> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] kx3 speaker

2016-12-02 Thread Fred Moore
just want to let anyone looking for a speaker for the kx3 to look at
this one.. small and light,  I purchased one and have been using it for
4 days.. it is small, and has a great sound.. has 8-9 hours on battery
power and charges with usb, the plug between the speaker and kx3 is even
provided..  no relationship to amazon.. but good speaker with a good
sale price

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00QU4RPD0/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8=1

regards.. Fred


-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna

2016-12-29 Thread Fred Moore
Don,

Thank you very much, for pointing out a very common issue that gets
mixed up into discussions.  Your point is so valid the random wire
always seems to get mixed into the 1/2 wave discussion for some
reason..  and should never be mixed together.  you are absolutely
correct..   thanks again regards..  Fred


On 12/29/16 12:33 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Scott,
>
> If the radiator is not a half wave long, it is not a "half wave".
> Yes, a random length wire may work, but please do not call a random
> length a half wave - the length of a half wave is quite specific.
> Similarly, a quarter wavelength is a specific length at a particular
> frequency.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> On 12/28/2016 11:20 PM, K9MA wrote:
>> The counterpoise for an end fed half wave (or multiple) really doesn't
>> have to be anywhere near a quarter wave long.
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna

2016-12-29 Thread Fred Moore
With an end fed 1/4 wave you only need a counterpoise that is about .05
wave length.  it can be the coax or another counterpoise.  Although a
counterpoise has some effect on radiation pattern of a quarter wave
radiator, it is minimal.   You won't see much improvement in performance
by going above .05 wave length..  it's not worth the trouble to increase
the counterpoise length..   Fred


On 12/29/16 9:01 AM, mjisted wrote:
> Looking at your text message on the elecraft board. About a half wave
> length ...here is a question for you. I'm going to put up a half
> wavelength of wire for the 5 mhz band. ..hyendfed can I use a quarter
> wave length of counter point as a radiator ground plane. .. 
> The. ..G0MVP. 
>
> mjis...@btinternet.com
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>
>
>  Original message 
> From: Fred Moore
> Date:29/12/2016 13:04 (GMT+00:00)
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna
>
> Don,
>
> Thank you very much, for pointing out a very common issue that gets
> mixed up into discussions.  Your point is so valid the random wire
> always seems to get mixed into the 1/2 wave discussion for some
> reason..  and should never be mixed together.  you are absolutely
> correct..   thanks again regards..  Fred
>
>
> On 12/29/16 12:33 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> > Scott,
> >
> > If the radiator is not a half wave long, it is not a "half wave".
> > Yes, a random length wire may work, but please do not call a random
> > length a half wave - the length of a half wave is quite specific.
> > Similarly, a quarter wavelength is a specific length at a particular
> > frequency.
> >
> > 73,
> > Don W3FPR
> >
> > On 12/28/2016 11:20 PM, K9MA wrote:
> >> The counterpoise for an end fed half wave (or multiple) really doesn't
> >> have to be anywhere near a quarter wave long.
> > __
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
> >
>
> -- 
> Fred Moore
> email: f...@fmeco.com
>f...@safes.com
> phone:  321-217-8699
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to mjis...@btinternet.com
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna

2016-12-29 Thread Fred Moore
oops here I am typing 1/4 when the whole time I was thinking 1/2.. 
thanks for correcting me.. Fred


On 12/29/16 11:09 AM, K9MA wrote:
> I think Fred meant an end fed 1/2 wave, NOT 1/4 wave. 
>
> 73, 
>
> Scott K9MA
>
> --
>
> Scott Ellington
>
>  --- via iPad
>
>> On Dec 29, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Fred Moore <f...@fmeco.com> wrote:
>>
>> With an end fed 1/4 wave you only need a counterpoise that is about .05
>> wave length.  it can be the coax or another counterpoise.  Although a
>> counterpoise has some effect on radiation pattern of a quarter wave
>> radiator, it is minimal.   You won't see much improvement in performance
>> by going above .05 wave length..  it's not worth the trouble to increase
>> the counterpoise length..   Fred
>>
>>
>>> On 12/29/16 9:01 AM, mjisted wrote:
>>> Looking at your text message on the elecraft board. About a half wave
>>> length ...here is a question for you. I'm going to put up a half
>>> wavelength of wire for the 5 mhz band. ..hyendfed can I use a quarter
>>> wave length of counter point as a radiator ground plane. .. 
>>> The. ..G0MVP. 
>>>
>>> mjis...@btinternet.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>>>
>>>
>>>  Original message 
>>> From: Fred Moore
>>> Date:29/12/2016 13:04 (GMT+00:00)
>>> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna
>>>
>>> Don,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much, for pointing out a very common issue that gets
>>> mixed up into discussions.  Your point is so valid the random wire
>>> always seems to get mixed into the 1/2 wave discussion for some
>>> reason..  and should never be mixed together.  you are absolutely
>>> correct..   thanks again regards..  Fred
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 12/29/16 12:33 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>>>> Scott,
>>>>
>>>> If the radiator is not a half wave long, it is not a "half wave".
>>>> Yes, a random length wire may work, but please do not call a random
>>>> length a half wave - the length of a half wave is quite specific.
>>>> Similarly, a quarter wavelength is a specific length at a particular
>>>> frequency.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Don W3FPR
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/28/2016 11:20 PM, K9MA wrote:
>>>>> The counterpoise for an end fed half wave (or multiple) really doesn't
>>>>> have to be anywhere near a quarter wave long.
>>>> __
>>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>>
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Fred Moore
>>> email: f...@fmeco.com
>>>   f...@safes.com
>>> phone:  321-217-8699
>>>
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to mjis...@btinternet.com
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>> believed to be clean. 
>> -- 
>> Fred Moore
>> email: f...@fmeco.com
>>   f...@safes.com
>> phone:  321-217-8699
>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to k...@sdellington.us

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna

2016-12-29 Thread Fred Moore
Jim,  almost everyone on the list immediately noticed that I
accidentally typed 1/4 when I actually meant to type 1/2.  They most
likely noticed it because the thread has been almost 100% about 1/2 end
fed radiators.   The person I replied to specifically asked about adding
a 1/4 wave counterpoise to a EFHW antenna.  It appears that you deleted
the part of the message I was replying to and only kept the portion you
wanted everyone to see..

My response (this post) has nothing to do with my miss-type (we all oops
sometimes)  it has 100% to do with making sure you have not confused
anyone on the list into thinking an EFHW is the same as a 1/4 wave
radiator..

BTW I 100% agree with everything you said about 1/4 wave radiators..  I
absolutely do not agree that ground losses are the same on 1/2 wave
radiators as they are on 1/4 wave radiators.. Discussions about current
node locations can be had another day..

Keep spreading accurate knowledge, everyone needs it, just make sure the
knowledge you spread applies to the subject.. otherwise it creates even
more confusion.. 

Regards.. Fred


On 12/29/16 1:58 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> Nothing in this post is true. Optimum length for a counterpoise is a
> quarter wave. Radials are a form of counterpoise, and their optimum
> length is also a quarter wave. More radials reduce ground losses.
> Failing to provide an adequate counterpoise will cause the antenna's
> return current to flow on your coax, which makes the rig hot with RF.
> That's not much of a problem with 5W, but it can be a very big deal
> with 100W or more.
>
> Of course, it does depend on what you mean by "much" and "minimal."
> Inadequate counterpoise or radial systems can easily reduce you signal
> by 6 dB. That's an S-unit, and it reduces your 5W signal to 1.25W.  I
> wouldn't call that minimal or "not much."
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On Thu,12/29/2016 7:30 AM, Fred Moore wrote:
>> With an end fed 1/4 wave you only need a counterpoise that is about .05
>> wave length.  it can be the coax or another counterpoise.  Although a
>> counterpoise has some effect on radiation pattern of a quarter wave
>> radiator, it is minimal.   You won't see much improvement in performance
>> by going above .05 wave length..  it's not worth the trouble to increase
>> the counterpoise length..
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com
>

-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 - AFSK RTTY

2017-03-29 Thread Fred Moore
Keith, I have been on unix for the last 30 years, and fought with
cocoModem for about 3 months, and finally came to the conclusion that it
is not ready for prime time. I would get it working for several weeks,
then it would quit..  I never got it to talk to my logging program even
with applescript, finally I moved to fldigi with logging and rig control
coming from rumlogNG and have never looked back... This gives more modes
than cocoModem supports.. 

I use both a signalink, and a small 7 dollar usb sound card depending on
my location (home/portable).  I could use the existing soundcard in the
mac, but just havn't build up a cable for that to work yet.. 

As others have said, you are only concerned about your tone spacing, not
the exact tones, the other end only sees space and mark tones..

feel free to contact me direct if you want to talk about the issues I had..

fwiw... regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

On 3/28/17 8:04 PM, Keith Onishi wrote:
> I have been trying to set up for RTTY operation with KX3 + iMic + cocoaModem 
> on Macbook Pro, but not successful.
> Mode selection on KX3 is AFSK A and cocoaModem setup is matched to the KX3 
> setting.
> RTTY signal received by KX3 appears not around 2125Hz but around 900Hz. So, I 
> set cocoaModem’s mark frequency to 915Hz. With that setting, decoded text 
> appears on the screen. KX3 VFO is properly tuned to the signal, of course.
> When FSK D on KX3, all is same. RTTY signal appears around 900Hz as well.
>
> I found this had been discussed several years ago in the ML, but no change in 
> KX3 specification since then.
> I would like to know if this mark frequency is OK in QSO with other RTTY 
> station.
>
> 73 de JH3SIF, Keith
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] OT: RFI problem on 80,40 with AT Uverse

2017-03-17 Thread Fred Moore
keep everyone filled in on the progress.. Fred

Fred Moore
email:  f...@fmeco.com
wd8...@gmail.com
Phone:  (321) 217-8699

On 3/17/17 3:37 PM, John Saxon via Elecraft wrote:
> Off topic, but perhaps others have had the same problem.
> I have a K3/100 + ATU (ser#3542), purchased as a kit in 2009.  No problems 
> with RFI until April of 2016.  All of a sudden RFI on 80,40(didn't try 160).  
> Been off these bands ever since, although all my buddies hang out on 40.  
> Have had AT out 4 times, no help.
> OK...I just found an AT Uverse user forum that discuss this very thing, 
> same symptoms as mine, with a ham participating.  If I am reading it 
> correctly, they are saying that the bands that Uverse uses for multiplexing 
> includes 160,80 & 40 frequencies.  One of the contributors said that AT 
> eventually upgraded his equipment, including replacing some twisted-pair 
> cables with CAT5 cables, and it solved the problem.  I am supposed to get a 
> call Monday from an AT guy who is familiar with this.  But I would like 
> input from my Elecraft ham buddies.
> Anyone out there experienced this before?  I don't think it is just me.  
> Anyone out there had this problem with AT Uverse and gotten it fixed?
> Reply off-line if you wish, but I believe there may be several on this 
> reflector who would find responses useful to them.
> Thanks!JohnK5ENQ
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] kx3 px3

2017-04-01 Thread Fred Moore
Anyone have any thoughts on getting the scale on the px3 to match the
s-meter on the kx3.. 

when the kx3 is showing a s9 signal the px3 is showing about s6..   3
s-units..

I have the pre-amp set to 20db, with a precision HP signal generator a
50mv signal does read S9 on the KX3 like it should, the px3 reads about
3 S units lower..

All cables are secure, and are the supplied cables between the kx3, and px3

Scale and Reference do not effect the delta between the readings.. 

surely there must be an adjustment I am missing in the PX3

This is a new PX3 built it yesterday morning, everything else works
properly..  ?

latest firmware KX3 and PX3

Regards.. Fred


-- 
Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] kx3 px3

2017-04-01 Thread Fred Moore
Thanks Fred, I have the book will look at it.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

On 4/1/17 8:13 PM, Cady, Fred wrote:
>
> Have a look at the How to Set Up and Interpret the PX3 Display in the
> PX3 manual  where this is explained (Or the Why??? section in the KE7X
> KX-Line book).  Basically the PX3 and KX3 are different bandwidth
> detectors so the signal levels displayed generally won't be the same. 
> They are two different instruments meant to show two different
> things.  The KX3 s-meter shows you the signal level you have to work
> with in the KX3 with its bandwidth and signal processing active and
> the PX3 is far more useful to show the relative signals across the band.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fred KE7X
>
> For all KE7X Elecraft books see ww.ke7x.com
>
>
>
>
> 
> *From:* Elecraft <elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Fred
> Moore <f...@fmeco.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 1, 2017 4:38 PM
> *To:* elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> *Subject:* [Elecraft] kx3 px3
>  
> Anyone have any thoughts on getting the scale on the px3 to match the
> s-meter on the kx3..
>
> when the kx3 is showing a s9 signal the px3 is showing about s6..   3
> s-units..
>
> I have the pre-amp set to 20db, with a precision HP signal generator a
> 50mv signal does read S9 on the KX3 like it should, the px3 reads about
> 3 S units lower..
>
> All cables are secure, and are the supplied cables between the kx3,
> and px3
>
> Scale and Reference do not effect the delta between the readings..
>
> surely there must be an adjustment I am missing in the PX3
>
> This is a new PX3 built it yesterday morning, everything else works
> properly..  ?
>
> latest firmware KX3 and PX3
>
> Regards.. Fred
>
>
> -- 
> Fred Moore
> email: f...@fmeco.com
>f...@safes.com
> phone:  321-217-8699
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to fc...@montana.edu
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] kx3 px3

2017-04-02 Thread Fred Moore
Fred:  Turns out I had already read everything you suggested, and did
correctly understand the compensation, however...

-73dbm at the antenna, signal generator only (no noise)

does =S9 on the KX3, and does not = -73dbm on PX3  (Lvl Mode = scale:db)


Per PX3 manual page 23 bottom right paragraph 5th sentence down:

"The indicated dBm level should be the signal level at the signal level
at the KX3 antenna input" 


In my case this is not true, I am seeing about a 10-12dBm difference. 
In my previous post, I referenced S9 and 50 microvolts, thinking most
people on the list are not use to referencing dBm, that was my error.
After re-reading my original post I even said mV when I intended
micro..  I should have been more specific, and correct..


I do not expect the PX3 to be a precision instrument, however I am
trying to resolve and understand a 10+db error here, huge to me, which
should not exist according to the PX3 manual, but may be in the PX3
specification if its specification is +-10%.  As a side note the PX3
scale does appear to be linear, relative to dBm, i.e. the error is the
same through the usable scale..


If that is normal I can live with it, I simply want to understand if
this is what others are seeing.. and make sure this new to me PX3 is
operating correctly..


Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

On 4/1/17 8:13 PM, Cady, Fred wrote:
>
> Have a look at the How to Set Up and Interpret the PX3 Display in the
> PX3 manual  where this is explained (Or the Why??? section in the KE7X
> KX-Line book).  Basically the PX3 and KX3 are different bandwidth
> detectors so the signal levels displayed generally won't be the same. 
> They are two different instruments meant to show two different
> things.  The KX3 s-meter shows you the signal level you have to work
> with in the KX3 with its bandwidth and signal processing active and
> the PX3 is far more useful to show the relative signals across the band.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fred KE7X
>
> For all KE7X Elecraft books see ww.ke7x.com
>
>
>
>
> ----
> *From:* Elecraft <elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Fred
> Moore <f...@fmeco.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 1, 2017 4:38 PM
> *To:* elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> *Subject:* [Elecraft] kx3 px3
>  
> Anyone have any thoughts on getting the scale on the px3 to match the
> s-meter on the kx3..
>
> when the kx3 is showing a s9 signal the px3 is showing about s6..   3
> s-units..
>
> I have the pre-amp set to 20db, with a precision HP signal generator a
> 50mv signal does read S9 on the KX3 like it should, the px3 reads about
> 3 S units lower..
>
> All cables are secure, and are the supplied cables between the kx3,
> and px3
>
> Scale and Reference do not effect the delta between the readings..
>
> surely there must be an adjustment I am missing in the PX3
>
> This is a new PX3 built it yesterday morning, everything else works
> properly..  ?
>
> latest firmware KX3 and PX3
>
> Regards.. Fred
>
>
> -- 
> Fred Moore
> email: f...@fmeco.com
>f...@safes.com
> phone:  321-217-8699
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to fc...@montana.edu
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Matching Power Amplifier

2017-04-06 Thread Fred Moore
I am also using the hardrock 50, works well have the internal atu as
well, I think the kit was 479 or something like that, took about 6 hours
to build, nice kit. works well, but don't hardly turn it on 5 watts CW
gets me where I want to go 100% of the time.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

On 4/6/17 11:03 AM, Ron Wilcox wrote:
> sorry, it is hobby pc that makes the amplifier, here is their website, and
> it is the hardrock 50., https://www.hobbypcb.com/
>
> Today is a good day to have a Great Day!
> 73   Ron Wilcox KF7ZN
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Bert Garcia N8NN <n...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Ron – I couldn’t find the amplifier on the QRP Guys website.  Do you have
>> a link?  I bought their iambic paddle recently.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bert N8NN
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ron Wilcox [mailto:rgloga...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 6, 2017 10:29 AM
>> *To:* Irma & Linas(LY2H) <irmalina...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* elecraft@mailman.qth.net; n...@earthlink.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Matching Power Amplifier
>>
>>
>>
>> qrp guys also makes a nice 50 watt amplifier that works great with the
>> KX2, has the cable for it, comes as kit for the fun of putting it together,
>> quality product as well
>>
>>
>> Today is a good day to have a Great Day!
>>
>> 73   Ron Wilcox KF7ZN
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Irma & Linas(LY2H) <irmalina...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Nice idea! Before Elecraft steps-in to this PA market, I am using with
>> great success and pleasure the Chinese MiNiPa50,:)
>> AT 5-6 W in from the Kx2 it yealds clean and healthy 45-50 W output on the
>> 80-20m bands and around 40W on higher bands. 6,6A current consumption at
>> 13-14V. No 6 m , no ATU though. ( For the ATU I use the famous Elecrat T-1,
>> yes, it can stand up to 40 W , just do not tune at this power level, :)) At
>> the price of approx 150 USD it is very good value for money, I think.
>>
>> 73 de Linas LY2H
>>
>> On 2017 bal. 6, kt at 16:34 Bert Garcia N8NN <n...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm enjoying my new KX2 transceiver!  I'd like to see Elecraft make a
>>> matching RF amplifier with about 35 watts output with 5 watts in.
>> Include
>>> an antenna tuner.  Same size and shape and style as the KX2.  Leave out
>> the
>>> SWR/wattmeter and the antenna switch.  Use a manual bandswitch if it will
>>> save money.  80-10 meters only.  Call it the KXPA35.
>>>
>>> Bert N8NN
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to irmalina...@gmail.com
>>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to rgloga...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] KX3 tuner getting stuck at 25.4:1 SWR

2017-04-21 Thread Fred Moore
Sorry for the late response..  I had the exact problem several weeks
ago.  Every time I removed the batteries the problem would be
resolved..  The problem was ultimately me being a dumb ass..  I had
purchased a nice blue tooth speaker that perfectly sat on top of the
KX3, however it kept sliding off.  My solution was to glue a small round
magnet on the front corners on the KX3 top.  I also glued the same small
magnet on the bottom of the radio.  Well guess what, I knew better but
didn't even think about magnetic shielding of the inductors in the ATU. 
While testing everything was fine, when I was convinced everything was
ok I would place the radio back in it's operating position everything
was still ok even with speaker on top, as long as I was on 20 meters, as
soon as I went to 40 which could be a couple of days later.. the radio
again went to 25.4:1  

One magnet was not enough to do it, but when both magnets were on the
top right hand corner, it was all over for the ATU.. makes 100% sense
now that I know what was happening...   Regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   f...@safes.com
phone:  321-217-8699

On 4/19/17 11:55 PM, nate t wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I opened up the KX3 and pulled the ATU, everything seemed to be in order and 
> the LPF was in the correct position. 
>
> I put the original batteries back in to keep the testing the same as 
> previously. They were a bit lower than I had previously thought, read 9V 
> (alkaline). I put up a 20m dipole and tested it, 20m tuned up right away and 
> I let it run for a bit. I then switched down to 40m and it tuned up right 
> away to a 1.0:1. After switching back and forth between 40/30/20 a few times, 
> I noticed that the relays seemed to be switching a bit slower than normal, 
> and that the tuning power was going down to 2.0W instead of the normal 3.0W. 
>
> Went to 40m again, and it started landing on the 25.4:1 SWR every try. Pulled 
> up the battery monitor on the display, and while it was running the tuning 
> process, the voltage was dropping down to 7.9V, and it'd stick at 25.4:1. 
> Switched over to external power and it would properly tune 40m again on the 
> 20m dipole without issue. 
>
> The dummy load I ordered arrived today as well, and using new batteries, it 
> will tune 1:0.1 on all bands. 
>
> I'm going to chalk this up to being a low voltage situation, and hopefully it 
> doesn't return!
>
> I appreciate everyone's suggestions.
>
> 73
>
>
>> On Apr 17, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
>>
>> 25.4:1 SWR is what the KX3 reads for a short or an open, if I remember 
>> correctly.
>>
>> Agreed, open it up, make sure everything is tight, include the ribbon cable.
>>
>> wunder
>> K6WRU
>> Walter Underwood
>> CM87wj
>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Don Wilhelm <donw...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nate,
>>>
>>> Since the problem is intermittent, I would not suspect a problem with an 
>>> active component.
>>>
>>> You might want to remove the bottom cover and check to be certain the 
>>> hardware on the BNC jack is tight and the LPF on the BNC connector is 
>>> properly positioned.  You may have to lift the KXAT3 to check - see Figure 
>>> 43 of the KX3 Kit Assembly Manual.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Don W3FPR
>>>
>>> On 4/16/2017 4:55 AM, nate t wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I was working with my KX3 earlier today, RX only, using an endfed, while 
>>>> running on batteries, RXing WSPR and PSK31.
>>>> After running for a bit, the ATU seemed to stop working. Attempting to 
>>>> retune on 40m, it would stick at a 25.4:1 SWR.
>>>> Tried switching down to 20m and it retuned right away to a 1.3:1. Applying 
>>>> external power to the unit, I tried tuning again on 40m (battery was 
>>>> reporting 10V if I recall correctly); It then tuned the end fed up, but 
>>>> only to a 1.7, which it will typically match to a 1.0:1, it would also get 
>>>> stuck at the 25.4:1 SWR on some of the attempted tunes.
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org
>> _

Re: [Elecraft] Is it my KX3/antenna or is it lousy band condx?

2017-08-13 Thread Fred Moore
There has been a happening in the last 15 or so years.  It seems that
every antenna is "the best we have ever had"  this statement is directly
proportional to the number of people who study theory to those who just
read others comments on the internet. Or as some say, the SWR is 1:1 so
its a great antenna.  BTW I love my dummy load for EXACTLY that reason.

I can clearly say that I have had enough different antenna's over the
last 35 years that I know what is a good antenna and one that is not.. 
plus I even understand most of the theory.  Today a new ham dumps
125-150 bucks in to a 5 dollar pre-manufactured wire antenna, and says,
this is the best antenna around even if he has never used any other
antenna.  See how good it works I even have an S9 noise floor, no other
antenna is this sensitive, when all the wile he is running 30db of
preamp he does not need.

Simply amazes me..  that some think they even have enough education or
experience to even have a meaning full opinion..  but away they go on
eham or qrz about how good something is.  Lucky most on Elecraft don't
all into this category.

We do have many good radio related sites out there, examples are those
who show current band conditions, low power reporting sites to check
your own propagation etc..  those we should learn to use as they are
meaningful but don't assume the to be 100% all of the time, 

I remember many years ago when I was elmering a new ham, he built a 15
meter beam, when he decided after one week that the 40/15 dipole I built
for him was just not working, I loaned him a HW16, he complained for
weeks that the something was wrong, I went over one Saturday to see what
actually was wrong, a spin across the band showed no signals, one CQ
with 50 watts and from Ohio I was the pileup of European stations, I
worked about 5 contacts, looked at him, and said,  "So what is wrong",
he says.. "what knob did you turn when I wasn't looking"  did you ever
call CQ "no says he"  "I think you need to actually use the radio before
you decide something is wrong" says I. 

If the band propagation sites say the band is dead, and your radio is
not hearing anything, most likely it is not your radio or your antenna. 
If you are hearing S9 noise and unhook the antenna and it goes away, I
will make you a bet that your radio is not broken.. 

And yes all of the switching supplies didn't exist 20 years ago, so we
need to do things we didn't have to do before with toroids and other
things that we didn't do before, there is even some noise sources we
can't fix as others are legally generating it.  Me thinks the days of a
usable -127db noise floor are few and far between, thanks mostly to what
our government is allowing to happen...   

FWIW/WYP.. regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 8/13/17 8:43 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote:
> Forget about "what you've been told".   Do your own research using various 
> publications such as ARRL Antenna Book or other like publications.   
> Personally in the "I've been told" area, it seems hams have more incomplete 
> and inaccurate information than correct and complete information. 
>
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 13, 2017, at 7:31 AM, rich hurd WC3T <r...@wc3t.us> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all, particularly Walter (since he mentioned it):
>>
>> I've been bedeviled by a question with multiple possible answers.
>>
>> I'm a fan of the idea of using a field antenna as Walter describes by using
>> a BNC - to binding post connector directly to the radio.
>>
>> I'm leery of that because it flies in the face of what I've been told about
>> these antennas:  I'm assuming the radio BNC connection is unbalanced and
>> the wires form a balanced antenna, more or less.  I've seen deployments
>> with end-fed 9:1 baluns and without, even documented on YouTube with great
>> successes.
>>
>> I can tell you that the 9:1 balun setup doesn't seem to be working for my
>> current field deployment but I'd sure like to understand why a balun isn't
>> recommended in this setup.  I'd love to just take the wire and put it on my
>> WonderPole and go for it, but I'd like the understanding first.Why does
>> this work?   :)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 13:19 Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You can get a quick look at band conditions at http://bandconditions.com <
>>> http://bandconditions.com/>
>>>
>>> Using Buddistick on 40 m is a real challenge. I would not be surprised if
>>> that was an S-unit or more below a full-size dipole.
>>>
>>> Try the simplest field antenna for the KX3, two wires connected directly

Re: [Elecraft] OT: Inverter type generators used for FD?

2017-06-30 Thread Fred Moore
When you evaluate generators look at the continuous load that is what is
important.  Lets compare two Honda units as an example the 2000i and the
3000i.  The 2000i is rated at 2000 watts for 10 minutes and 1600
continuous, while the 3000i is rated at 3000 watts for 10 minutes and
2800 continuous. 

Purchasing two 2000i with a slave kit (48 bucks) will run you 1900 bucks
and give you 3200 continuous, while a 3000i will give you only 2800
continuous, you also get to spend 500 bucks more for the 3000i.   The
3000i is  131lbs, while each 2000i is 47lbs each.  I can move two 47 lb
units by myself, a 131lb unit is hard on us old people.

It is much more flexible to have two and only pull out the second one
when you really need it.  one drawback, the 3000 is quieter then two
2000i by a few db's.  Two generators also burn lightly more fuel, but
you may also be able to run two in economy mode, while you would not be
able to run the 3000i in economy making up for the difference in fuel. 

I also have found no reason for any type of filter with Honda's..
additional savings.  Also note that one brand the noise hash was being
emitted directly from the generator not the power line, a filter won't
fix that one. 

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT: Inverter type generators used for FD?

2017-06-30 Thread Fred Moore
Over the last several years we have tested about 6 different brands of
inverter generators.  Hash on all of them except the Honda's.  I have
not seen any hash on the 1000, 2000, or 3000 generators.  One brand had
hash over +20 on 40 meters.  It was coming directly from the generator,
not the power line cord, moving it out from the trailer on a 100' cord
reduced the hash to around S6. Of course Honda's are the ones everyone
else is trying to beat with a lower price point.  You only get a lower
price point one way in a competitive market, make it cheaper.   Just
purchased a 2000i from Mayberry advertised in QST for 929 free freight
and sales tax to me here in Florida (no relationship).  150 bucks
cheaper than anywhere else I could find it.

Regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT: Inverter type generators used for FD?

2017-06-30 Thread Fred Moore
Jim;  When using the Honda's I have no experience of relative location
to the antenna's causing a problem. 

Also I am absolutely sure no one on this list would expect to hear noise
below the noise that is below the noise when they already had a high
noise floor for other reasons, and they are already hearing noise from
the high noise floor not caused by the generator they could not hear
because of the already high noise floor they already had before the
generator noise floor was generated below the noise floor. 

All of my testing was done with places far removed from the mains, that
is why I need a generator to start with.  

The generator I alluded to that was generating extremely high hash, was
generating it without anything plugged in, not even an extension cord,
the hash did not diminish when you placed it on a load either, so it was
NOT common mode.  That generator was the Generac Inverter (3 different
ones) that is competing with the Honda.

BTW I consulted your web site, and didn't see any references to the how
far a generator must be kept from the antenna's, Please add a reference
for all of us so we know when we will have a problem, we may not be able
to move it without advanced warning of the problems it might cause.

If anyone on the list is hearing noise from their generator that is
below their normal noise level, please let us know.. so we can get it
documented on Jims web site.

And I still don't need a common noise choke you designed, so don't think
I will build one, no matter what the mechanism is.

Regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 6/30/17 1:55 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 6/30/2017 6:19 AM, Fred Moore wrote:
>> I also have found no reason for any type of filter with Honda's..
>> additional savings.  Also note that one brand the noise hash was being
>> emitted directly from the generator not the power line, a filter won't
>> fix that one.
>
> This will, of course, depend on how close the generator and its power
> wiring is to antennas. It also depends on the other RF noise at the
> site. We operate FD, CQP, and 7QP from places where there is NO local
> noise other than what we bring with our gear, so it's common to see
> S2-S3 on our K3 meters. If you're somewhere with S6 background noise,
> you're less likely to hear noise from the generator. In 7QP, we
> operate portable from multiple locations on county lines, so we have
> two generators mounted on the bed of the pickup truck that pulls our
> contesting trailer. This puts the generators right underneath our
> antennas, which makes filtering critical.
>
> The mechanism here is that noise is conducted onto the power cable
> from the generator as a common mode signal, which radiates into our
> antennas. That's why the common mode choke is needed, and why it works.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Keying CW in SSB Mode

2017-07-03 Thread Fred Moore
Ted, it's not a great strategy any time, and yes most likely that is
what was going on.  You should see their signal when they have RF on the
audio or a hum.  Not exactly meets the FCC requirements.  If you are
listening with a wide filter some times you even get to hear their
Microsoft Windows generated tones if they forget to turn them off. 

Let the flood gates start with all of the "you can't tell the difference
so it's ok"  But I can and have seen it many times with bad signals..

It's not CW keying, its USB or LSB keying with a single tone.   It makes
me crazy when someone calls it CW keying, no way it is

Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 7/2/17 10:32 AM, Dauer, Edward wrote:
> I wonder if this explains something I ran into during FD.  On several 
> occasions – usually late at night – I was able to do some running, all on CW. 
>  Five or six times over several hours I heard stations calling me way off my 
> frequency.  It seemed like a Khz or more, though I didn’t measure it at the 
> time.  They were outside the passband and I heard them only when, after a CQ, 
> I tuned the RIT widely on either side.  I wondered why that would be 
> happening.  I certainly wasn’t the target of a pileup.  One possibility I 
> thought of was that those callers had forgotten to cancel split after the 
> last time they intended to use it.  But this thread about audio tones keying 
> CW on SSB suggests another.  Is it possible that they were using CW keying on 
> USB or LSB which resulted in a frequency offset of, typically, 600 (or, as 
> Don suggests, 1200) Hz?  If so, it seems like it wouldn’t be a great strategy 
> during a contest on a crowded band.
>
> Ted, KN1CBR
> 
>


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] MAC BOOK KX3 QUESTION

2017-07-31 Thread Fred Moore
I find the simplest way is to just use a 9 dollar usb sound card dongle
to handle the input and output audio on my Macbook Pro. and use fldigi
and RumlogNG, along with other mode software to get everything done. 
Works FB... Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 7/31/17 4:24 PM, Steve Sergeant wrote:
> Gerry:
>
> I suspect that your MacBook Pro does have an audio input. If there's not
> a separate mic connector, then the headphone connector probably provides
> a mic/line input on a 4-conductor TRRS connector.
>
> You might have to build a custom cable.
>
>
> On 7/31/17 1:10 PM, Gerry Miller wrote:
>>  HI GUYS,  I AM USING A MAC BOOK PRO FROM 2010.  I HAVE THE LATEST SOFTWARE 
>> AS OF THIS DATE.  THE QUESTION IS, DOES "BIG E" HAVE A CABLE AVAILABLE THAT 
>> WOULD ALLOW WORK WITH MY MAC (USB) TO SEND-RECEIVE DATA SOFTWARE I HAVE ON 
>> THE PC?I AM ABLE TO DOWNLOAD KX3 UPDATES, BUT DO NOT KNOW IF I COULD USE 
>> THE SAME CABLE FOR  RTTY/PACKET/JT  SOFTWARE THAT I MAY HAVE ON THE MAC.  
>> THE MAC DOES NOT HAVE A CONNECTION FOR A MICROPHONE SUCH AS WOULD BE 
>> AVAILABLE ON A WINDOWS MACHINE.  I MUST ADMIT THAT I AM NOT COMPUTER 
>> LITERATE.TNX AND 73AA2ZJ 
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT Learning Morse anew

2017-06-12 Thread Fred Moore
I am convinced that the barrier most folks have is from bad habits that
allow you to unconsciously learn double and triple conversion in your head.

when you are slow..  hear the sound, count the elements, determine what
it means, then convert to writing.. 

I am 100% convinced that doing anything to fix that problem is the only
solution to the problem.. 

My real life story, which has been applied to multiple other people and
has fixed the problem in most cases..

Back in the mid 70es I was trying to break the 13 WPM barrier to get my
General License.. I was working several stations per night but not
getting anywhere with my speed..  A friend at work who was not a ham,
but taught CW in the Army finally heard from me enough and said "are you
free tonight and do you have a code practice oscillator"  I did so over
he came..

He grabbed a book from the shelf, handed me some paper and said..

I am going to transmit at 15WPM for the next 15 minutes.  I want to you
write each letter down, don't worry about the mistakes I don't care
about them..  I will not stop.

After the 15 minutes he took the paper and started writing down
letters...  He only wrote down the first letter I missed in a string
when done he said..

you are double translating in your head and there are 6 elements you
really don't know.  So after a cup of coffee, he sent me those 6 letters
for the next hour at 20 wpm, no writing only saying the letter out loud
as I heard them.  Spacing was also fast..  no farnsworth, don't even
think it existed them..  if I had it wrong he didn't say anything, he
just kept repeating the character till I had it correct then he went
on.   after a break, we then spent another hour doing the same thing
with all other elements and then he went home. 

The next night he came over and I not only was at 13wpm but could write
at 18 wpm 100%.

then he said.. now get on the air, from now on you are only allowed to
write name, call, address if sent, otherwise copy in your head..you
now know all elements of the code, if you are writing you are
translating from ear to mind to hand,  you do not want to translate at
all, anyone is capable of writing from memory without stopping to
translate..

problem fixed..  and have been enjoying CW since then..  I have used
this method about 10 times myself on other hams, and in all but one case
the problem was fixed...  

the moral..  listen to faster code than you need, and put down the
pencil and paper.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 6/12/17 5:59 AM, Rick M0LEP wrote:
> I only allowed myself to buy my KX3 after I'd completed a number of CW 
> QSOs. I stumbled through most of them, but I confidently expected the 
> KX3 would provide me with an incentive to improve my Morse, and I'd get 
> better at it quite quickly. It didn't quite work out that way, though. 
> I've had my KX3 since February 2013, and I'm still mostly stumbling 
> along at sub-12wpm.
>
> I don't think there is any such thing as "The Perfect Method". I was 
> sold on "Koch" (with a side order of "Farnsworth"), which some folk 
> swear is the One True Way to learn Morse, but the Koch incremental 
> approach turned out to be a complete waste of time for me.
>
> I suspect good teaching in a face-to-face class would probably have 
> worked a lot better, but that sort of thing is pretty much impossible to 
> find these days. The CWOps courses seem to get quite a bit of praise, 
> and while they're not quite face-to-face (as they rely on something like 
> Skype) they are at least led by real people rather than machines. Their 
> main drawback is that they seem to have a waiting list well over a year 
> long.
>
> At the end of the day, I expect improving your Morse mostly comes down 
> to practice, practice, practice. Having that practice guided by an 
> experienced teacher would probably help a lot. If you can, find some 
> local experienced Morse mentors, listen to their advice, and then 
> practice, practice, practice...
>
> and try to get out and operate at whatever speed you can manage.
>
> On Sun 11 Jun Jim Sr Sturges wrote:
>> I think I learned code all wrong. Can't ever seem to get my speed up.
>>
>> Surely some of the astute among you _know_ The Perfect Method, and I hope
>> you will share?


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Counterpoises and Grounding

2017-06-10 Thread Fred Moore
Jim, lets stop talking about grounds totally when dealing with RF, it's
just a confusion factor when it comes to discussions.  unless we are
talking about as NEC and others when they correctly call it a "Safety
Ground" or a "Grounding Conductor" and make sure that everyone
understands the difference..  most don't

discussions should be about

Safety Grounds, and grounding conductors 100% about 60 cycle and DC currents
common connection points  100% about how the above are connected
counterpoises, radiating elements: deals 100% with RF and antenna's

etc.. properly understanding each one and you won't be confused at all..

I also disagree with your statement

"First, and most important, for lightning protection and electrical safety."

The first and most important item is an electrical Safety Ground as it
protects people, they can't be replaced.
Second is lightening protection, as it typically protects equipment. 
equipment can be replaced

They don't carry the same weighting factor.. as very few worldwide are
killed from lightning vs improper safety grounds.

most likely the only thing we don't agree on..  everything else you seem
spot on...  Regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 6/10/17 3:10 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Sat,6/10/2017 11:40 AM, Stan GW3SRM wrote:
>> I note that the subject of counterpoises has been debated many times
>> in this
>> forum but I have not seen the subject of tuneable artificial grounds
>> discussed.
>
> Fundamental concepts like this are very well addressed in the classic
> references on antennas. Your use of the word "counterpoise" is
> precisely correct. Your use of the word "ground" is absolutely and
> totally WRONG.
>
> A connection to Mother Earth does NOT make a transmitting antenna work
> better. The earth is a big resistor. Shoving TX RF into it wastes TX
> power by warming worms.
>
> What IS needed, no matter where you operate, is a return for antenna
> current -- SOMETHING to act as the other half of the antenna. Antennas
> like a dipole inherently provide that; with an end fed antenna, we
> must supply that "other half," and the correct name for it is
> "counterpoise."
>
> Transmitters are designed to work into some defined load Z, usually 50
> ohms, but with some tolerance. That tolerance is often defined by the
> apparent SWR as measured at the transmitter. The function of an
> antenna tuner is to transform the Z at the transmitter end of the
> feedline to the Z that the transmitter want to see -- that is, the Z
> into which it will provide the most power, and do so without stressing
> the output transistors or tubes. The so-called "artificial grounds"
> provide the same function, but in a different way -- they vary the
> electrical length of the counterpoise so that the combination of the
> "intentional antenna" (the end fed wire) and the counterpoise make the
> Z at the transmitter as close as possible to 50 ohms. This allows the
> TX to put power into the antenna. That counterpoise, whatever it is,
> is PART OF THE ANTENNA. And that's true whether we CALL it "ground" or
> counterpoise.
>
> Another point. ALL end-fed antennas must put their return current
> SOMEWHERE. If we don't provide a "good" path  (like a good
> counterpoise), mother nature will take over and put the current where
> SHE wants it to go, like anything attached to the chassis of the
> transmitter. This can be a coax shield, the power system protective
> earth (green wire), a wire going to a ground rod, even telephone
> wiring or CATV wiring connected to that ground rod. (Remember, the
> earth is a big resistor). KK9H, a fairly smart engineer who is one of
> my old buddies in Chicago, intentionally uses the HVAC air ducts in
> his home as a counterpoise for a 160M wire. At my last Chicago QTH, I
> used a big wrought-iron fence running around the front of my lot as a
> counterpoise on 160 and 80 for a Tee-vertical.
>
> A connection to mother earth is important for only two reasons. First,
> and most important, for lightning protection and electrical safety.
> Second, for SOME receiving antennas, where the resistance of the
> ground makes the antenna work, or where the loss of efficiency caused
> by adding the resistance to an RX antenna doesn't matter.
>
> SO -- let's stop using (or thinking about) the word "ground" in
> conjunction with TX antennas, and in stead, talk (and think) of
> counterpoise.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto

Re: [Elecraft] Counterpoises and Grounding

2017-06-10 Thread Fred Moore
Jim please accept my apologies, I didn't realize that since you have
written extensively on the subject and actually had a website that no
one else is allowed to comment without being chastised for contributions. 

I have made myself a note to never reply to any conversation you are
currently or could possibly become involved in , as all authoritative
answers have already been provided on your web site.. and absolutely
nothing else ever need be discussed.

and again I must disagree with you.  when you state that

"I think what you view as disagreement is my failure to write well enough."

you write extremely well, your condescending attitude comes through very
clear, to everyone. 

Still wondering if I should remove all of my links on the internet, as I
now realize I only need one.

again, please accept my apologies.. I will make every attempt to make
sure it never happens again. 

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 6/10/17 4:36 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Sat,6/10/2017 12:39 PM, Fred Moore wrote:
>> Jim, lets stop talking about grounds totally when dealing with RF, it's
>> just a confusion factor when it comes to discussions.
>
> That's what I said.
>
>>   unless we are
>> talking about as NEC and others when they correctly call it a "Safety
>> Ground" or a "Grounding Conductor" and make sure that everyone
>> understands the difference..  most don't
>>
>> discussions should be about
>>
>> Safety Grounds, and grounding conductors 100% about 60 cycle and DC
>> currents
>> common connection points  100% about how the above are connected
>> counterpoises, radiating elements: deals 100% with RF and antenna's
>>
>> etc.. properly understanding each one and you won't be confused at all..
>
> I've written extensively on this topic, and both that writing and
> several slide shows are on my website. k9yc.com/publish/htm
>
>>
>> I also disagree with your statement
>>
>> "First, and most important, for lightning protection and electrical
>> safety."
>>
>> The first and most important item is an electrical Safety Ground as it
>> protects people, they can't be replaced.
>> Second is lightening protection, as it typically protects equipment.
>> equipment can be replaced
> Again, I refer you to my website.
>>
>> They don't carry the same weighting factor.. as very few worldwide are
>> killed from lightning vs improper safety grounds.
> They are not different. Again, see my website. ALL grounds in a
> premise MUST be bonded together. PERIOD. Power entry, Telco entry,
> CATV entry, antennas, shack, etc. These connections must NEVER be
> separate or independent of each other.
>
>> most likely the only thing we don't agree on..  everything else you seem
>> spot on...
>
> I think what you view as disagreement is my failure to write well enough.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] PX3 interfering with rig control to KX3?

2017-10-10 Thread Fred Moore
Bill, I use exactly the same setup, and I just verified mine is working,
even after "High Sierra" upgrade. 

I had that problem when I first set it up and the problem was in the
Serial speed in RumlogNG   in my case. 

My speed in rumlog was differtent than the speed on the PX3.  Since it
goes there first before the KX3, The PX3 will not pass the bad baud rate
date to the KX2, I set all of my speeds to 38,400, RumlogNG, the PX3 and
the KX3..

hope this fixes your problem also.. 

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 10/10/17 1:50 AM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> I was using my KX3 to operate QRP during the California QSO party. I
> had my logging program (RUMlogNG on a Mac) connected through the PX3
> to the KX3 using an Elecraft USB <--> RS232 interface cable.
>
> I noticed the computer was not getting the band and frequency
> information from the KX3. When I unplugged the PX3 from the KX3 and
> connected the computer directly to the KX3, the computer got the
> frequency/band information correctly, so the PX3 was involved in the
> problem. I spent the rest of the contest swapping the plugs in the
> KX3. :-(
>
> The computer <--> PX4 <--> KX3 combination has worked in the past. Is
> there something flakey in the PX3, of have I set some configuration
> parameter badly? Or? Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> 73 Bill AE6JV
>
> ---
> Bill Frantz    | Security is like Government  | Periwinkle
> (408)356-8506  | services. The market doesn't | 16345 Englewood Ave
> www.pwpconsult.com | want to pay for them.    | Los Gatos, CA 95032
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] X-class flare

2017-09-06 Thread Fred Moore
I thought a hurricane took mine down here in Florida early..  thanks for
letting us know what is going on, don't monitor this stuff as I should..
thanks.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 9/6/17 6:13 AM, dgb wrote:
>
>
> Haven't noticed any change here - working VK's on 80 and 40 last
> couple of hrs.
>
> 73 Dwight NS9I
>
>
> On 9/6/2017 4:53 AM, Stephen Prior wrote:
>> I had just dragged a coax cable through to the lounge to play with my
>> KX2
>> in a comfy chair and could hear nothing!  That explains it!  There is a
>> small amount of activity on 20m FT8 and JT65 that I can see, all
>> close Eu
>> stuff though.
>>
>> 73 Stephen G4SJP
>>
>> On 6 September 2017 at 10:49, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP
>> <k2vco@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a few minutes ago at 0925z there was a massive solar flare.
>>> The burst of X-rays totally turned off the HF bands. It sounds like my
>>> antenna fell down!
>>>
>>> Propagation will gradually return during the day, but a sudden event
>>> like
>>> this is exciting.
>>>
>>> "Region 2673 just produced a major X2.2 solar flare at approximately
>>> 09:10
>>> UTC (Sept 6). This is the first X-Class event to be detected since May
>>> 2015. The active region is still in a decent position for Earth
>>> directed
>>> eruptions. More updates will be provided should a coronal mass ejection
>>> (CME) be associated. More to follow. Image courtesy of SDO/AIA."
>>> -- <http://www.solarham.net/>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 73,
>>> Victor, 4X6GP
>>> Rehovot, Israel
>>> Formerly K2VCO
>>> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
>>> __
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> Message delivered to eastbrantw...@gmail.com
>>>
>> __
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to n...@bayland.net
>>
>>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] [OT] - Tech Only Discussions

2017-08-21 Thread Fred Moore
Thanks for specifying that this group is not related to the Elecraft
Company.  That makes my decision about joining your group very easy for
me. 

.. Fred 

I'll only post this one time...   That way I can make sure I observe the
Elecraft OT rules as well.. 

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 8/21/17 7:57 AM, Michael Walker wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am only going to post this one.  I have created a spin off group for
> technical only Elecraft discussion.  No OT discussion and focused truly on
> the issues of your wonderful Elecraft hardware.
>
> This will allow this group to proceed as normal, yet this is an option for
> those that only want to focus on the specifics of Elecraft hardware.
>
> This group is not associated in anyway with the Elecraft company.
>
> I will also be looking for a few moderators, so if you are interested,
> please let me know.
>
> Please do not do a reply all to the original Elecraft group as I want to
> observe their OT rules as well.
>
> Details are:
>
> Group Email Addresses
>
>- Post Message :elecraft-t...@yahoogroups.com
>- Subscribe :elecraft-tech-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
>- Unsubscribe :elecraft-tech-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
>- List Owner :elecraft-tech-ow...@yahoogroups.com
>
>
> 73, Mike va3mw
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Noise Blankers

2017-09-04 Thread Fred Moore
Ron, you are 100% on the money.. I was thinking about how I wanted to
explain the same thing.. thanks.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 9/3/17 7:04 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
> The advantage of controlling the gain manually is not an "old wife's tale". 
> Rather, it's clearly just a technique that is not for everyone. 
>
> AGC will reduce the gain according to the strongest signal inside the I.F. 
> passband. Manually riding the "RF" gain ensures that a very weak signal is 
> not affected by a strong signal that is also inside the I.F. passband. Of 
> course that means your ears could be blasted by that strong signal, which is 
> why Wayne included a hard limiter that can be enabled to chop such a signal 
> down to size, making it no louder than the weak signal we want to copy. 
>
> It has become a moot point for many operators today who cannot read CW if 
> they are hearing two or three (or more) signals within the I.F. passband all 
> at the same time. For them, it's essential to have enough I.F. selectivity to 
> isolate one signal and so AGC is just fine. 
>
> But some of us have a lifetime of experience sorting out multiple signals 
> with our gray matter between the ears and prefer to continue to do so -- 
> probably until we all become SKs. 
>
> 73, Ron AC7AC
>
>  
>
> -Original Message-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Wes Stewart
> Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 3:00 PM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Noise Blankers
>
> Just a couple of points.
>
> In the K3(S) there is no "RF Gain" control unless by RF gain you mean "It's 
> not the audio gain gain control."
>
> The "RF" gain control operates on the i-f amplifier, which is after the 
> analog noise blanker. In this regard, it is little different from AGC, which 
> operates on exactly the same circuitry. Why some people believe that they are 
> better at controlling i-f gain than the AGC system does is beyond me, but old 
> wife's tales die hard.  If this is hard to fathom, watch the S meter as you 
> reduce "RF" 
> gain.  The reading increases, no different from letting the AGC do it.
>
> Attenuation is a different matter. It operates at RF and is a viable tool.
>
> About noise blanking, I think I had a little to say about that almost 40 years
> ago: http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Noise_Blanker.pdf
>
> Wes  N7WS
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] CW Contest and Elecraft K3s decoder

2017-11-27 Thread Fred Moore
This is exactly why I do not work CW contests anymore.  CW contests have
become a machine contest not a Ham contest... But some people will go to
any expense to make sure they are number one.  Not interested in even
giving them a 1 point..

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 11/27/17 8:54 AM, d...@elecraft.com wrote:
> There's a lot of automation.  
>
> Here's one of the best in the world at ZF2MJ, running 20 and 15 meters 
> simultaneously. It's kind of mind-boggling.
>
> Dan (N6MJ) and Chris (K9LA) won WRTC in Boston, after placing quite high in 
> earlier WRTC efforts.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3ncFJZqkTA
>
> 73 de Dick, K6KR
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill Frantz
> Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2017 22:42
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW Contest and Elecraft K3s decoder
>
> Under the rules, in the assisted categories, using decoders is legal. It is 
> also legal, but perhaps unwise, to use the spotting network to "read" the 
> call signs. Wiser is to verify a spotted call sign, which is a lot easier 
> than to copy it cold. In the unassisted categories, all these techniques are 
> illegal.
>
> I think most stations were using a macro to send their report. 
> Since the report in CQ WW DX is constant, setting up a macro is easy. Copying 
> the report is a different matter, but I found the reports easier to copy than 
> the calls, since the reports were all numbers (with some Ts, As, and Ns 
> tossed in for brevity).
>
> 73 Bill AE6JV
>
> On 11/26/17 at 9:21 PM, marvwhee...@nwlink.com wrote:
>
>> I personally don't depend on the rig decoding but listening this 
>> weekend let me know that either the big boys are using something to 
>> decode station callsigns and are definite using an automated system to send 
>> their report.
>> Using the K3S cw speed option I saw several that read over 60 wpm. I 
>> realize there are those that can copy that fast but not this old boy.
> 
> Bill Frantz|"Insofar as the propositions of mathematics 
> refer to
> 408-356-8506   | reality, they are not certain; and insofar 
> they are
> www.pwpconsult.com | certain, they do not refer to reality.” 
> -- Einstein
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
> delivered to d...@elecraft.com
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] CW Contest and Elecraft K3s decoder

2017-11-28 Thread Fred Moore
I quit contesting when about 5 years ago, when I walked into the 20
meter CW station at field day to relieve someone, I found 5 guys who
could not copy any CW at all, averaging 140-150/hour one was watching CW
skimmer and clicking on the calls, one was sending call/599 with
keyboard and one was logging with another keyboard.  The other two were
there just in case someone got tired of typing..  All at the same time
they were telling jokes and drinking coffee.

I'm out of here says I, I still work FD, but refuse to work a CW
contest, yes 30 meters is your friend on contest weekends

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 11/27/17 10:30 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
> I certainly sympathize with your feelings Fred. I too quit contesting when 
> all RSTs were 5NN and rude behavior became acceptable. That was a long, long 
> time ago. 
>
> I just segue to 30 meters or QRT until the mayhem is over and I can have a 
> real QSO with someone. 
>
> Operating is, for me, a form of meditation that reduces stress. The hand that 
> reaches for my key has gotten a lot older over the past 65 years of pounding 
> brass but the effect on me is still the same.  I choose to keep it that way.  
>
> 73, Ron AC7AC
>
> -Original Message-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred Moore
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 5:09 PM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW Contest and Elecraft K3s decoder
>
> CW skimmer can copy almost anything.  I will not play in their sand box... 
>
> I think we need a good contest where each ham sends an actual RST he copes, 
> and a personally designed 3 alpha numeric check sum.  The check sum get 
> published when he/she turns in their log.  The logs get computer compared any 
> call where RST and Checksum that is copied correctly during the exchange gets 
> 5 points anyone that is incorrect looses 100 points for that QSO.  The 
> contest sponsor should be putting out false calls and frequencies on the 
> frequency spotter list, if any of those calls show up on any list the whole 
> log gets tossed and their name published as a cheat..  There should also be 
> people who only call CQTEST and never answer a call, if there call shows that 
> log is also tossed.
>
> I have not use for CW decoded qso's as a learning tool or otherwise.. off my 
> soapbox
>
> Fred Moore
> email: f...@fmeco.com
>wd8...@gmail.com
> phone: 321-217-8699
>


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] MacOS High Sierra FTDI driver issue

2017-11-24 Thread Fred Moore
Bill, I am currently on High Sierra, RumlogNG is still operating just
fine on my KX3  I have not checked the utilities for the for the KX3, I
don't have a K3, the drivers don't know if this information helps or
not, drivers might be different... 

Regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 11/23/17 4:09 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> I upgraded my computer to MacOS High Sierra and found it could not
> contact the K3. The K3 utility failed, RUMlogNG failed, and wsjt-x
> failed. I found the following by robertklep on the web:
>
> What seems to have worked for me is actually removing the FTDI driver
> (/Library/Extensions/FTDIUSBSerialDriver.kext), after finding that
> Apple ships an FTDI driver with the OS itself
> (/System/Library/Extensions/AppleUSBFTDI.kext).
>
> I moved the driver out of /Library/Extensions/FTDIUSBSerialDriver.kext
> and things started working again.
>
> 73 Bill AE6JV
>
> ---
> Bill Frantz    |Security, like correctness, is| Periwinkle
> (408)356-8506  |not an add-on feature. - Attr-| 16345 Englewood Ave
> www.pwpconsult.com |ibuted to Andrew Tanenbaum    | Los Gatos, CA 95032
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] CW Contest and Elecraft K3s decoder

2017-11-28 Thread Fred Moore
Not a looser at all..   I'm quite happy to not play in the robot CW
pool.  Most of the time these roboCW guys leave their rig off, except
during the contest, so life is very good for the rest of us. 

BTW sorry I didn't consult you before I posted my comments..   I'll try
to do better in the future... I bow to your cow dung, and those who you
know, who most likely sit in the dung you fling. 

My last comment on the subject.. 

  Regards.. Fred

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 11/28/17 1:48 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> You're the loser on that one, Fred. While there may be guys like that,
> the vast majority of contesters are not in that category.  All the
> great contesters I know (and I know a lot of them) can pick fly specs
> out of cow dung.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On 11/28/2017 6:48 AM, Fred Moore wrote:
>> I quit contesting when about 5 years ago, when I walked into the 20
>> meter CW station at field day to relieve someone, I found 5 guys who
>> could not copy any CW at all, averaging 140-150/hour one was watching CW
>> skimmer and clicking on the calls, one was sending call/599 with
>> keyboard and one was logging with another keyboard.  The other two were
>> there just in case someone got tired of typing..  All at the same time
>> they were telling jokes and drinking coffee.
>
>
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] CW Contest and Elecraft K3s decoder

2017-11-27 Thread Fred Moore
CW skimmer can copy almost anything.  I will not play in their sand box... 

I think we need a good contest where each ham sends an actual RST he
copes, and a personally designed 3 alpha numeric check sum.  The check
sum get published when he/she turns in their log.  The logs get computer
compared any call where RST and Checksum that is copied correctly during
the exchange gets 5 points anyone that is incorrect looses 100 points
for that QSO.  The contest sponsor should be putting out false calls and
frequencies on the frequency spotter list, if any of those calls show up
on any list the whole log gets tossed and their name published as a
cheat..  There should also be people who only call CQTEST and never
answer a call, if there call shows that log is also tossed.

I have not use for CW decoded qso's as a learning tool or otherwise..  
off my soapbox    

Fred Moore
email: f...@fmeco.com
   wd8...@gmail.com
phone: 321-217-8699

On 11/27/17 5:53 PM, EUGENE GABRY wrote:
>> On November 27, 2017 at 2:39 PM Fred Moore wrote:
>>
>>  CW contests have
>> become a machine contest not a Ham contest...
>>
>
> This is something I fight personally when I decide to enter a CW contest. 
> Technology is great, it has allowed those who are either not proficient at CW 
> or can't even copy CW, to be able to communicate.
>
> I've always thought the focus of a "conTEST", whether CW or SSB was to test 
> the capabilities of the "operator" to accurately receive the information 
> sent, making as many contacts in the time period of the contest as possible. 
> Scores determined in part, by busted calls or other information copied 
> incorrectly, and then scoring against their peers. 
>
>
> Today there are a lot of (Robots) that can decode CW. It is true that all 
> robots are not the same, and errors could occur. Just wonder when we draw the 
> line as to who/what is being judged for accuracy.  
>
>
> I love the technology. It's great for communications. (I think you know where 
> I stand on robotic modes like FT8 :) )
>
> But in a contest, "these days" it seems to come down to who has the best 
> robotics (machines) to eliminate the human element for the sake of driving up 
> the score to new levels.
>
>
> 73 Gene
>
> N9TF  
> __
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to f...@fmeco.com


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com