RE: AV! a full time job?
I like blunts, too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I use to think it was my lazy boss. And I was told it was him, but when crap hits the fan its clearly not him, it's broken down by who maintains the product... by choice of the team members. If that sounds ugly or a bad way to run a team, your right. But that is another story. I really liked what James Blunt said. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the network? If it's you, you're the boss - change the passwords and tell them to stick it! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Other departments who have the rights to do it. We have argued this to the Nth degree, trust me its beyond all hope. If we change passwords we get chewed out and told to change them back. -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some passwords. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: AV! a full time job? Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: AV! a full time job?
PC people have no time for blunts -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I like blunts, too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I use to think it was my lazy boss. And I was told it was him, but when crap hits the fan its clearly not him, it's broken down by who maintains the product... by choice of the team members. If that sounds ugly or a bad way to run a team, your right. But that is another story. I really liked what James Blunt said. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the network? If it's you, you're the boss - change the passwords and tell them to stick it! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Other departments who have the rights to do it. We have argued this to the Nth degree, trust me its beyond all hope. If we change passwords we get chewed out and told to change them back. -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some passwords. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: AV! a full time job? Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: AV! a full time job?
WAY TO GO Jim! Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for others, you gotta be doing something right. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Quote away! You can also add in there that we were just subjected to a GOA (Gov. Office of Accountability) audit of our network infrastructure and security practices. Due to about 5 people in this company that are infinitely smarter than I am, we passed with flying colors and are now used as the comparison standard for these audits. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
We are not PC Mm blunts. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 5:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? PC people have no time for blunts -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I like blunts, too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I use to think it was my lazy boss. And I was told it was him, but when crap hits the fan its clearly not him, it's broken down by who maintains the product... by choice of the team members. If that sounds ugly or a bad way to run a team, your right. But that is another story. I really liked what James Blunt said. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the network? If it's you, you're the boss - change the passwords and tell them to stick it! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Other departments who have the rights to do it. We have argued this to the Nth degree, trust me its beyond all hope. If we change passwords we get chewed out and told to change them back. -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some passwords. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: AV! a full time job? Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300
RE: AV! a full time job?
But can he pass a Boa??? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? WAY TO GO Jim! Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for others, you gotta be doing something right. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Quote away! You can also add in there that we were just subjected to a GOA (Gov. Office of Accountability) audit of our network infrastructure and security practices. Due to about 5 people in this company that are infinitely smarter than I am, we passed with flying colors and are now used as the comparison standard for these audits. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any Exchange services are running. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as a heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit and you have planted the seeds of despotism around your own doors. --Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Seigler Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any Exchange services are running. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Correct, I should have elaborated. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange what? You mean without an Exchange Aware backup, right? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as a heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit and you have planted the seeds of despotism around your own doors. --Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Seigler Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Actually, it's not recommended to backup any \exchsrvr folder while any Exchange services are running. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Wow do I feel stupid! :) Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Come on people, do you see the :) at the end of the sentence? It was sarcasm... I was trying to be humorous, I figured no one would believe such an outlandish story, obviously I was wrong... Sorry... -cm -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I had a #$%#$% step dad that was like that. One time, the combustive properties of helium came up in our conversation (don't ask me why). He insisted that helium was a combustible gas. I told him he was wrong and eventually had to break out the Funk Wagnall's to prove it. The very first sentence under Helium stated, of course, that it was, in fact, a non-combustible gas. His response was (I'll never forget), How old is that encyclopedia? What a moron! Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Sorry our admin proxys out microsoft.com, he says since they're criminals he rates their site right up there with hacking and porn sites. :) -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
Have you applied any of the post-SP4 hotfixes? -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's I have tried logging on as the service account but that didnt work either. (Is that what you meant ?) As a strange side effect, i have built a test server without Ex SP4 and restored from our live system and it worked. As soon as i done the SP upgrade it stopped working ! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's Logged on as Administrator, or an Exchange administrator? You need to be the later. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deleting Empty ABV's [Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views but when i try I am told i do not have permission. Logged in as Administrator, NT4, SP6, Ex 5.5 (SP4). Any ideas anyone ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Uninstall
Look at Q259158. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Uninstall I am looking for a way to remove completely all files and all registry entrees from a failed exchange 5.5 install on a 2000 machine that is in an active directory environment. What happens is the install goes fine, but just as it starts to replicate, it fails. The error is the System Attendant can't find the file specified. But no listing as to what the file is. I don't want to rebuild this server just because it is a pain. What happen, is a tech had a bad Exchange CD. She borrowed mine, and didn't throw her's away. Guess which CD she gave me back and thought was mine. Her bad one. So I am looking for documentation on all regentries, locations of all files so I can manually remove this thing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday
Friday! A short week Ready for year's end parties Wishing my friends well _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Problems???
Rerun the Performance Optimizer prior to doing anything. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Problems??? Sorry...forgot to change the subject before sending last time...my apologies. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:55 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet Gentlemen Ladies: Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three mailbox servers, One OWA Server. All servers are Windows 2000 Sp2. IMS, mailbox servers and bridgehead are Exchange 5.5 SP4+3, OWA is Exchange 5.5 SP4+2. Problem: I think I have my first major problem with the Event Store. Got the following messages in my Event Log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent Error: 0x8004011b Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcCreateLink Error: 0x8004011b I have searched the MS Exchange KB, but come up blank. Everything references EcGenerate, EcGet or EcDo functions. Nothing matches exactly. I figured I would run the isinteg.exe with the following switches: ISInteg -pri -fix -test alltests Suggestions? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Did you follow the prerequisite and installation instructions exactly? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Or this: Error: Error logging on anonymously : -2147024809: [Collaboration Data Objects - [E_INVALIDARG(80070057)]] Default.asp: Can not logon to system. PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
According to the setup instructions, the only supported way to run the app is on a server that at least has OWA installed. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Yep and Like I said sometimes it works fine I take that back the only thing I did not do was reboot the exchange server after setting the anonymous info. Question if you modify the global.inc file can you have this app reside on a machine that is not the mail/OWA server? PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Did you follow the prerequisite and installation instructions exactly? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Or this: Error: Error logging on anonymously : -2147024809: [Collaboration Data Objects - [E_INVALIDARG(80070057)]] Default.asp: Can not logon to system. PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
You'll have to catch and eat me, you wierdo... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? But can he pass a Boa??? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? WAY TO GO Jim! Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for others, you gotta be doing something right. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Quote away! You can also add in there that we were just subjected to a GOA (Gov. Office of Accountability) audit of our network infrastructure and security practices. Due to about 5 people in this company that are infinitely smarter than I am, we passed with flying colors and are now used as the comparison standard for these audits. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
I was so hoping that people would just let that one lay. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? You'll have to catch and eat me, you wierdo... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? But can he pass a Boa??? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? WAY TO GO Jim! Anytime you can pass a GOA inspection AND be used as the standard for others, you gotta be doing something right. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Quote away! You can also add in there that we were just subjected to a GOA (Gov. Office of Accountability) audit of our network infrastructure and security practices. Due to about 5 people in this company that are infinitely smarter than I am, we passed with flying colors and are now used as the comparison standard for these audits. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAV for Exchange 5.5
Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
You should really look at the archives for this answer. All the rants are contained there. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
anyone know
I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
It can mean that. What is the Compaq Array Config utility showing? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
It will work fine for you if you learn how to use it. The rants are usually from people who don't know how to use the tool. I was pretty unhappy with my chainsaw, too, until I learned to hold by the correct end. Until then, it really did a number on me. Read the readme.txt file, and pay attention to every caveat in it. All the rants you find in the archives (that I can recall) are about issues that are either in the readme.txt or in their knowledge base top ten questions list. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 You should really look at the archives for this answer. All the rants are contained there. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
PS, another good argument is that it is a good thing to have 2 AV solutions in place. NAV on the servers and desktops, Scanmail on the Exch server. Quite often, one AV program may pick up a virus that the other misses. Plus you get DATs at different times. Symantec is NOTORIOUSLY slow in posting DAT updates. Especially in emergency situations, whereas Trend is typically fast. If you follow the NAV solution, you will may forced to bring email offline while you wait ALL DAY for that DAT update. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
I notice a POST 1785 error in compaq intergration managment log on dec 12 2001 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It can mean that. What is the Compaq Array Config utility showing? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going to get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
In other words, you don't know the config. How much total space does the RAID 5 volume report. I bet if it reports 36.4 then you have a RAID 5 plus hot spare. If it reports 54.6GB you have a RAID5 with a failed parity drive. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
OK, open up the Compaq Array Management Tool. See what it says. It will also place entries in the Event Viewer. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know this is a year old server and the 4 drives are part of a raid 5 array -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Is this new or just newly discovered? If those 4 drives are part of a RAID 5 array with a hot spare, the hot spare light doesn't come on. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachment Problems
When did this problem start occuring? How long has the system been in production? Are you running any A/V software on the system? Are the recipients that strip the attachments the same everytime versus the one's that do not strip the attachments? -Original Message- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachment Problems Hi Guys, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on 2000 Adv Srvr. Our outgoing attachments are not received on external recipient machines. If I send an e-mail with a .doc attachment to Hotmail it comes up as attach3 When sending to other companies some receive the attachments no problem and with others the attachment is stripped completely. Our IMS settings: Attachments Outbound: MIME Plain Text Any ideas as to how to fix this? Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Kelly would agree with you on that. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Yes, it is great as well. But the question isn't what should he use, it is should he use NAV instead of the Scanmail he already has. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
smart array 431 controller, slot 3 array A with spare 34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Run Sybari on the Exchange Server and Sophos Antivirus on the client side. Sophos is the fastest I've seen with new updates. Probably because they are based in Europe. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Kelly would agree with you on that. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
I think you store some kind of make-up in it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on is the hot spare. A -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know smart array 431 controller, slot 3 array A with spare 34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
cool thanks aaron I dont know that much about compaq servers never had a problem with them yet thank god. Does anyone know any good places where they teach you how to configure a compaq server in a week long class. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on is the hot spare. A -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know smart array 431 controller, slot 3 array A with spare 34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Richard, I would suggest that you or someone else in your company look into ASE training. http://www.compaq.com/certification/na/ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
ScanMail and Groupshield get my votes. We are actually trying to get one of our customers off of NAV 2.1 Build 56 (too old to be effective). One of the major drawbacks with this version is that in order to block a file of extension type .xxx you actually have to go into the registry and put an entry there. Talk about antiquated. I don't know how their current version is, but I would check that out to make sure you are not getting it. A major pain in the ... Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sybari Antigen for Exchange (www.sybari.com) is the best A/V Solution for your Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
http://www.compaq.com/training/cd-st.html -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know cool thanks aaron I dont know that much about compaq servers never had a problem with them yet thank god. Does anyone know any good places where they teach you how to configure a compaq server in a week long class. Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Then you have a RAID 5 array with a hot spare. The drive with no light on is the hot spare. A -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know smart array 431 controller, slot 3 array A with spare 34719 mb raid 5, logical drive 1 -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Happy Holidays
...and what was that...turning it off on the IMS?! Is it true that they are not secure and reveal everything about the Exchange server?!! Alex A. Network Errand Boy -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Happy Holidays Russ Cooper took countermeasures about those OOFs :) Happy Holidays to you all!! -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:56 PM Subject: RE: Happy Holidays I was just thinking about that... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Happy Holidays It's Christmas season Inbox becomes cluttered with Out of office mail (c)2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I(r) Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Agreed. Why have hamburger when you can have a nice thick slab of roast beast. Scanmail is far more Admin friendly as comared to NAV for MSX. -- From: John Matteson Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going to get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Just a thought ... isn't anti-virus part of network security? Which makes it EVERYONE's job? Might need a HMFIC to oversee/ upgrade/ promote it, but in the end it's part of every admin's job to one degree or another. John -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? It could be, depending on the company (someone has already hit on a number of different elements). It would also depend on how much AV your company has in place right now. If you're going from ZERO AV protection, yes, it should be a full time project until you have the layers of protection in place and running. This could be easily rolled into a generic network/computer security position, which should be a full time job. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
I don't know William... Sounds like you're unsatisfied Living here with us. Having served ten years as an Army Staff Sergeant, Proud of my country. Just one more question, Do you stand up or salute This nation's great flag? If you would like to... I'll buy you a one-way trip To third-world nation. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't wartally fixed should be dexposed prepatically. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I don't know William... Sounds like you're unsatisfied Living here with us. Having served ten years as an Army Staff Sergeant, Proud of my country. Just one more question, Do you stand up or salute This nation's great flag? If you would like to... I'll buy you a one-way trip To third-world nation. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
No Haiku here William was Being sarcastic As he can Be at times D Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the street. -Elbert Hubbard -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I don't know William... Sounds like you're unsatisfied Living here with us. Having served ten years as an Army Staff Sergeant, Proud of my country. Just one more question, Do you stand up or salute This nation's great flag? If you would like to... I'll buy you a one-way trip To third-world nation. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Tom...I agree with you. Same setup, no problems. In fact, we usually know about and have .dat file updates in place, before the people across the street even find out about possible problems...they're running TrendMicro Scanmail. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
What??? -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't wartally fixed should be dexposed prepatically. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I don't know William... Sounds like you're unsatisfied Living here with us. Having served ten years as an Army Staff Sergeant, Proud of my country. Just one more question, Do you stand up or salute This nation's great flag? If you would like to... I'll buy you a one-way trip To third-world nation. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More info in Q248013. -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
It was twice. And I know...twice it too many as well. Both times, there was user error on my and the helpdesk end...so I can't blame it on scanmail. If I'm forced to go with NAV, then I will just have to grin and bear it. Who knows it might turn out to be a chicken fried steak with mashed taters and green beans for us. Time will tell. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Maybe the LED needs replacing... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that! D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
What to me looks like the SADMIND, SADMIND came out before CODERED and was also an automated trojan. Digital Island turned to Narus for billing mediation software and was able to stop the leakage. Major Linux Distributions forcasted Kansas City by 3 1/2. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday What??? -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday No you're wrong. My encephalod scissors are working properly. And another thing: any flea-written scambot that isn't wartally fixed should be dexposed prepatically. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I don't know William... Sounds like you're unsatisfied Living here with us. Having served ten years as an Army Staff Sergeant, Proud of my country. Just one more question, Do you stand up or salute This nation's great flag? If you would like to... I'll buy you a one-way trip To third-world nation. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday God Bless the U.S.? The most successful country? Bless Afghanistan! Freedom to express? Fire! in a crowded theatre? BLB = good? Unprecedented World co-operation From this tragedy. We thank the nations By withdrawing from thirty Year old bomb treaty. Yes sir, Mr Blunt, Should the 'good' win in the end I hope it's still us. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/28/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday An old year going One we will never forget Hope youngsters learn well Much tragedy, much good Some have experienced pain Some became heroes Don't think bad people will overcome the good ones Good wins in the end Bin Laden look out We're going to find you soon We won't have mercy To all our heroes in our cities everywhere I salute you now My heart is with brave military personnel protecting our lives A new year coming We'll celebrate all night long Having fun with friends No country like ours Has the freedom to express God Bless the US _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Haha! no, everything is on a rack server now..mo gigage processor, and rammage! This server made all the difference in the world with my environment. I was giving scanmail a bike to run a car race back then. :) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that! D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: anyone know
mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
A That, I can see... :o) D Burnout: Attitudes are contagious, mine might kill you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Haha! no, everything is on a rack server now..mo gigage processor, and rammage! This server made all the difference in the world with my environment. I was giving scanmail a bike to run a car race back then. :) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that! D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Then the people across the street don't know WTF they are doing. That is the only answer. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Tom...I agree with you. Same setup, no problems. In fact, we usually know about and have .dat file updates in place, before the people across the street even find out about possible problems...they're running TrendMicro Scanmail. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
Perfect works great now I appreciate the help Another question then. Do you know where the code is to change the way this thing looks? As much as I like Yellow it kind of clashes with, well everything. PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More info in Q248013. -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Go Huskies!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: anyone know
I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free [1]. [1] I'm just a vendor 'ho -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Go Huskies!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.
AVAPI Scanning question.
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is it that MS did not put the hooks in for software companies to get that information in their AVAPI scanners? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: anyone know
Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains. Of course you'll freeze your hiney off! ;o) I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs today... ;o) D There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free [1]. [1] I'm just a vendor 'ho -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Go Huskies!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
RE: anyone know
As a side note, I'm fixin to move to NC which will be considerably warmer though. ;o) D There is nothing to fear but fear itself. -Franklin D. Roosevelt -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Well, Ellensburg is in the mountains. Of course you'll freeze your hiney off! ;o) I do like Major Applewhite as well though, too bad he's playin the Dawgs today... ;o) D There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know I'm rootin' for the Longhorns myself, not that I really care being a native So Cal boy. I just like Major and Texas in general. I also spent one year in Washington (Ellensburg) and froze my ass off the whole time so I generally have negative memories. But the tickets, food, and beer are all free [1]. [1] I'm just a vendor 'ho -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Go Huskies!! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Yep, and the Huskies are going to whoop on the Longhorn's! [1] ;o) D [1] Or so I hope they do...[2] [2] Dr. Dogg, where are you? [3] [3] He's probably suffering the BAS syndrome [4] [4] HI SHERRY!!! ;o) The true test of character is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know mutter Ramming speed gentlemen, and load the fish taco torpedoes. [1] [1] Of course firing them AWAY from Andy's general direction inflicting much pain on him. [2] [2] You know, I think I'll go have Rubio's at Qualcomm Stadium later today [3] [3] Holiday Bowl today you know. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know Ah yes. I remember them on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Singing Pilgrims. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know It's something the Pilgrims singed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What is a Compaq? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know hold on let me check -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anyone know What does the network admin say? Seriously what does it say in the Compaq array config util? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: anyone know I have 4 18.2 gig scsi drives and one of the lights on the 4th drive is not lit up and the server is a compaq prol ml370. Does this mean the hard drive failed. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: CRC errors
are you also taking CRC errors on the serial int of your router out to the ISP? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: CRC errors I have been seeing CRC errors on my Exchange Server CPQNTAC utility for the last few days, multiplying at the rate of about 2500 errors over a period of 24 hours on an average. Considering that CRC errors could be hardware related I swapped the NIC but this did not resolve the issue, my next step is to schedule some downtime and check cables etc. It does seem to be within our network as our ISP has cleared their T1 lines. Any ideas or comments on this issue would be appreciated. MSExchange 5.5 sp4 on NT Server sp6. Thanks Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
Check out Q282184 and Q248398. Do a search on the MS exchange admin newsgroups, I believe the problem has been discussed there with an appropriate fix. (I ran into a similar situation once... I'd describe the fix, but I'm not 100% sure and I'd rather not give you wrong information. I believe it involved downgrading temporarily the version of DSMAIN.EXE). -- Jad Mouracadé [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darren Ash Sent: December 28, 2001 2:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's I have tried logging on as the service account but that didnt work either. (Is that what you meant ?) As a strange side effect, i have built a test server without Ex SP4 and restored from our live system and it worked. As soon as i done the SP upgrade it stopped working ! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's Logged on as Administrator, or an Exchange administrator? You need to be the later. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deleting Empty ABV's [Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views but when i try I am told i do not have permission. Logged in as Administrator, NT4, SP6, Ex 5.5 (SP4). Any ideas anyone ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
Restoration Solutions?
Hi, Running Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT server. We backup the server nightly using client agent from InnoculateIT. Unfortunately one of our users has misplaced or lost a large amount of mail and it is nowhere to be found. We are curious what restoration options are available with Exchange as we have not done this previously. Short of setting up another Exchange server and restoring the databases, is there any way quickly to access the backed up mail? Otherwise, what suggestions does the group have for making this restoration easier in the future? Thanks much, Robert VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X.400 headache
I am trying to get an X.400 connection working between a server in a Exchange 5.5 Org and a Exchange 2000 server in an AD domain - all test environment. I am certain I have something misconfigured as I have the logging turn all the way up and see connection refused. I have tried matching passwords on both sides, removed the passwords. I can't find anything on Technet or the Knowledge base for any of the event IDs I'm getting. Can anyone point me to some trouble shooting documentation? Thanks Ken Jasa Messaging Administrator Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I agree that Antigen is better than NAV for Exchange, we have not had any problems with it for over a year. This is also a test because as of yet I have been unable to post a question _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Client Access Problem
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally (including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the internet, it is failing with Unable to open your default email folders. The microsoft Exchange server is unavailable. Network problems blah blah blah. The firewall is currently open to any (wide open). and when I check the syslog connections are being established. I'm at my wits _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Client Connectivity
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your default email folders. The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server is down for maintenance I can ping it. The Firewall is now wide open, allowing any. I'm at my wits end _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Client Access
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your default email folders. The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server is down for maintenance I can ping it. The Firewall is now wide open, allowing any. I'm at my wits end -- __ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com
I haven't played with changing the colors myself but the color scheme is set in Global.inc. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Perfect works great now I appreciate the help Another question then. Do you know where the code is to change the way this thing looks? As much as I like Yellow it kind of clashes with, well everything. PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com My mistake - it's global.asa that should be excluded, not global.inc. More info in Q248013. -Original Message- From: Ferneyhough, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Try excluding global.inc from from your virus scanning. I've seen this cause intermittent problems like this in the past. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Actually I downloaded it and followed the instructions and when I access it, it will appear once then return: HTTP Error 500-12 Application Restarting PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com Works great for what it does and if you need it to do more, you can always hire the developer of the script to customize it for you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone used the phone list on www.cdolive.com I would like to hear what you think about it and if you have had any issues with it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Client Connectivity
U... You're trying to access your exchange server from the internet You DO realize how unsecure that is right??? Why would you even attempt such a thing with VPN and OWA in place D Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it. -Henry David Thoreau -Original Message- From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Client Connectivity I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your default email folders. The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server is down for maintenance I can ping it. The Firewall is now wide open, allowing any. I'm at my wits end _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Client Access
How many times are you going to send this Changing the subject line will not garner different responses... D Hazards: There is an Island of Opportunity in the middle of every difficulty, miss that, though, and you're pretty much doomed. - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Client Access I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However, when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your default email folders. The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server is down for maintenance I can ping it. The Firewall is now wide open, allowing any. I'm at my wits end -- __ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help Connectivity Issue
I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 standard server from IE 4.01 to 5.5 sp2 and got up to date on patches. I am not sure this is the cause, but now internally clients connect fine (including the VPN), owa works fine. However when connecting over the internet, I get an error Unable to open your default email folders. The Microsoft Exchange Server computer is not available. Either there are network problems or the Microsoft Exchange Server is down for maintenance I can ping it. The Firewall is now wide open, allowing any. I'm at my wits end -- __ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restoration Solutions?
Alright, so what is the good backup solution for the Exchange databases? We have not performed test restores to date. We like to make sure everything goes to hell if the server crashes - okay, well not really. Do you have any recommendations for restore procedures (testing purposes?). Thanks, Robert You backup your server using an AV solution??? That seems strange... Not to mention, impossible. Now, if you're using ArcCrapIt, you're still in deep doodoo. It's a widely known fact that while ArcCrapIt may back up your server, it is very unlikely that it will restore in the event of a disaster such as yours. Additionally, do you not perform test restores? Might I ask why if your answer is no? D If you had to identify, in one word, the reason why the human race has not achieved, and never will achieve, its full potential, that word would be meetings. -- Dave Barry -Original Message- From: Robert V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restoration Solutions? Hi, Running Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT server. We backup the server nightly using client agent from InnoculateIT. Unfortunately one of our users has misplaced or lost a large amount of mail and it is nowhere to be found. We are curious what restoration options are available with Exchange as we have not done this previously. Short of setting up another Exchange server and restoring the databases, is there any way quickly to access the backed up mail? Otherwise, what suggestions does the group have for making this restoration easier in the future? Thanks much, Robert VadeBonCoeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Client Access Problem
For the love of god Stop sending the same friggin message with a different subject! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Client Access Problem I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally (including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the internet, it is failing with Unable to open your default email folders. The microsoft Exchange server is unavailable. Network problems blah blah blah. The firewall is currently open to any (wide open). and when I check the syslog connections are being established. I'm at my wits _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Client Access Problem
LOL After seeing the fourth post, I just knew steam was starting to come out of your ears! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Client Access Problem For the love of god Stop sending the same friggin message with a different subject! D Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: Ed Premus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Client Access Problem I recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 server from IE 3.01 to 5.5 Sp2. I don't really understand this but clients are able to connect internally (including VPN) and through OWA. However when I try to connect through the internet, it is failing with Unable to open your default email folders. The microsoft Exchange server is unavailable. Network problems blah blah blah. The firewall is currently open to any (wide open). and when I check the syslog connections are being established. I'm at my wits _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something? D Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Id give you a big hug if it wouldn't be all awkward, then would have to punch each other to maintain a manly appearance. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
