[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  No man, he was grooming the boy.  Speach is not protected when 
it 
 is
  in this context.  He was just dead wrong.
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
   no_reply@ wrote:
   
This is very funny:

http://www3.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=178
   
   
   
   Uh, which Republican are you referring to?
   
   Foley?
   
   1) He didn't molest anyone...
   
   2) Had he had consensual physical relations with the boy in 
 question 
   there would have been no crime committed because the boy was 
 over 
   the age of consent.
   
   I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are 
raking 
 this 
   guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it 
 was 
   speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as 
 regular 
   users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.
  
 
 Shempgurk...it   was ...
 UN  ...fvckin ...  ETHICAL



Of course it was!

What's your point?

You want to throw someone in jail for speech that was unethical?  
For sleazy speech?

Think about the implications of what you're saying if you answer 
is yes.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No man, he was grooming the boy.




Grooming him for what...sex?

If it WAS for sex, and the two then went on to have consensual sex, 
there would have been no crime because both were over the age of 
consent.





  Speach is not protected when it is
 in this context.






Speech is most definitely protected in this context everywhere... 
EXCEPT the internet!

Foley could have been chatting up this kid on the phone or at the 
local bar, got him into bed, and there would be ZERO crime committed.

It's just that there are these weird laws about the internet that 
make what he did MAYBE a crime.

Now, of course, all this doesn't address either the sleaziness of it 
all and the fact that there are the considerations of his role as a 
Representative that has its own sets of rules that he could have 
broken (and probably did)...but those aren't crimes but broken rules 
internal to the House of Representatives.

Again, we ALL should be VERY concerned about the laws that curtail 
speech on the internet.

That's really what this issue is all about.






  He was just dead wrong.

Of COURSE he was dead wrong...but he may not have committed any 
crime.




 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
  no_reply@ wrote:
  
   This is very funny:
   
   http://www3.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=178
  
  
  
  Uh, which Republican are you referring to?
  
  Foley?
  
  1) He didn't molest anyone...
  
  2) Had he had consensual physical relations with the boy in 
question 
  there would have been no crime committed because the boy was 
over 
  the age of consent.
  
  I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are raking 
this 
  guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it 
was 
  speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as 
regular 
  users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Is there no one willing to defend Foley's right to free speech?

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
Freedom of speech includes the right to be sleazy and inappropriate.

Why is there no one except myself willing to step forward and ring the 
bell of alarm over the eagerness of almost everyone to have Foley 
convicted of a crime over his free speech?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
...that sleazebags like Foley have the right to solicit males over 
the age of consent for sex.

Of course, Foley didn't HAVE sex with any of the males in question 
on these tapes.

But if he did and you, the reader, are for gay rights, you are FOR 
Foley having sex with whomever he can convince to have consensual 
sex with him.

Now, if he is breaking a rule of his place of work when he does 
that, that's another matter.

So, tell me, who amongst you are FOR gay rights and support Foley's 
right to have consensual phone sex and consensual gay sex with the 
17-year-old?

Com'n my fine feathered liberal friends...who's for it?

Judy?

Bhairitu?

Spare Egg?

Barry?

Your silence is deafening...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Eh. I see guys acting just as their guru has requested that they act.

Just as an experiment, replace the word 'guru' in the 
above sentence with other words, and see how you feel
about the guys in question:

I see guys acting just as their Daddy has requested that they act.

I see guys acting just as their Mommy has requested that they act.

I see guys acting just as their gpvernment has requested that they act.

I see guys acting just as their priest has requested that they act.

I see guys acting just as their family has requested that they act.

...etc.

If you are comfortable being one of those kinda guys,
who has so little going for him that he just does what
he is told without question, good for you. Some of us
prefer to grow up and do what *we* want to do...








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] And the Abigail Williams Award goes to...

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
Take a look at the this Age of Consent Table (scroll down for each of 
the U.S. states) and pay particular attention to the male-male and 
female-female columns to the right:

http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm

Interestingly, it is illegal in Florida to have male-male sex (I'm not 
sure if that's just with a minor or for anyone) which is where the 
emails may have originated to and from (so much for my previous claims 
that they could have had sex and it would NOT be a crime!)...BUT SEE 
HOW MANY STATES HAVE REPEALED THE MALE-MALE LAWS!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] master course on Charaka Samhita with Raj Vaidya Mishra

2006-10-04 Thread at_man_and_brahman
Some of you may be aware of the expertise 
of Vaidya Mishra. He comes from an
unbroken family tradition stretching back
5000 years. The Puranas tell of his 
ancestors and their great knowledge of
Ayurveda. Even today, he practices
Shudh Ayurveda, a pre-Buddhist form
that preserves special knowledge in many
areas unknown to the other vaidyas,
including a much more extensive marma
therapy than commonly practiced or 
taught. Vaidya Mishra worked for 
MAPI for roughly a decade, developing
some of its most popular products.

He will be offering a master course on the
principal textbook of Ayurveda, Charaka
Samhita, being inaugurated on
Dhanvatari Jayanti, October 19th, 2006.

In this course, he will explore Charaka
verse by verse, offering extensive 
commentary.

If you would like to be a part of this
once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to learn
Ayurveda as few people know it, contact
Health Synergies in Indianapolis at
(317) 356-2342.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
   snip
   
So when I found out about all this stuff about 
King Tony getting his weight in gold, and Rajas 
and gold crowns, it was really a mindboggler. I 
think sometimes that those who lasted long enough
for that kinda stuff to have become commonplace 
don't understand just how weird it really is.
   
   
   You mean like the proverbial frogs in the vat of lukewarm 
   water over a continual flame where you don't realize you're 
   done until your blood
   is boiling and your brain is cooked?
   
   :)
  
  
  Heh. Some of these frogs had to pay a million dollars for the
  privilege of jumping in the 
  pot in the first place. I don't think you can claim that they're
  being fooled on some level.
 
 Who said anything about anyone being fooled? The comments have to do
 with people being around long enough for that behavior to become
 commonplace, millionaires or not. BY the time folks were asked for 
 the million they'd been in there a long time already.
 
 Besides--the frog thing was a tongue-in-cheek throw away line.

It was *also* a completely accurate metaphor for
what's happened to these silly people. 

If Sparaig weren't in Professional TM Apologist
mode, he'd be talking about how brainwashed they
are, too.   :-)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
   How do you know its faux enlightenment?
  
  Come on Spraig, cuz they act like dicks.  If there was an
  enlightenment, don't you think that it would at least include not
  acting like a dick?
  
  (I know the movement line on this but I am appealing to the guitar
  playing Spraig who knows these guys are just pompous asses}
 
 Eh. I see guys acting just as their guru has requested that they act.
 
 What's pompous about that?

I don't think anyone held a gun to anyone's head, to wear a crown.
Perhaps they like wearing crowns.
Many monarchs past and present seem to like their crowns...
Besides, who cares?
Look at the Catholic church, and all of their head-dress;
Those Native Americans, were many pretty wild cults...?
Yes? But certain European cults, who considered them inferior-
Like, that cult wiped them out.
Is TM wiping anyone out.
Has any witch been burned at the stack, by the TMO.
Has anyone been beheaded, as they do in the purest Saudi Arabian 
cult...
The Islamic cult, think suicide is cute...
As far as cults, I would think the TMO;
 So, if cults is your study- The TMO is certainly not the weirdest, as 
you say;
Quite the contrary, I would think..
R.G.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
How do you know its faux enlightenment?
   
   Come on Spraig, cuz they act like dicks.  If there was an
   enlightenment, don't you think that it would at least include 
   not acting like a dick?
   
   (I know the movement line on this but I am appealing to the 
   guitar playing Spraig who knows these guys are just pompous 
   asses}
  
  Eh. I see guys acting just as their guru has requested that 
  they act.
  
  What's pompous about that?
 
 I don't think anyone held a gun to anyone's head, to wear a crown.
 Perhaps they like wearing crowns.

It's a kind of peer-pressure gun. These are people
who have decided that being close to the guru or
(even sadder) being *perceived* as being close to
the guru is the most important thing in their lives.

This phenomenon exists in many spiritual trips. But
in most of them, the guru doesn't make someone
pay a million bucks for the privilege of being
perceived as close to him. In the TMO, he does.
And there are people who actually go for it.

As a personal choice, I guess it's acceptable. But
if you're suggesting that they're not *laughable*
to have *made* that choice, I don't think you're
going to find very many people on the planet who
agree with you. The rest would consider these
people fools.

A question for Sparaig the Professional TM Apologist:

Do you actually believe that Maharishi *respects*
these people?

If so, think that many here who (unlike you) have 
actually had some experience being around him and 
watching how he treats people would disagree with
you. 

I'd be willing to bet that Maharishi considers
them fools, too. 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: MMY address Nov, 1960; Lakshman Joo?

2006-10-04 Thread Robert Gimbel
  
   (snip)
(1) at the junctions of intake and offtake of respiration,
(2) at the junction of the change of cognition from one object to
an-other and (3) concentration on objectlessness.



This is a perfectly really good description of what happens becoming 
familiar with the transcendent.
With the practice of the siddhis...
The 'simplest state of awareness'...
'The objectiveless state of awareness aware of itself'.
There is no contridiction between the two teachings:
Just slightly different descriptions of the transcendent...
R.G.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] 'Is Sexuality Compatible w/Spirituality and Enlightenment?'

2006-10-04 Thread Robert Gimbel
Anyone care to share???
R.g.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Foley (war bravery)

2006-10-04 Thread Robert Gimbel
 shempmcgurk@ wrote:
   
   snip 
And as far as cowardise on the part of Bush is concerned: 
Well, 
going into the job, Bush knew that he:

1) had an approximately 1 out of 10 chance of being killed on 
  the 
job (4 out of 42 presidents have been assassinated in U.S. 
   history); 
and

2) had an approximately 1 out of 8 chance of being wounded 
   ('cause, 
like Reagan, there have been numerous unsuccessful 
assassination 
attempts that have wounded presidents).

Name me one war U.S. soldiers have ever been involved in 
where 
  the 
odds were worse than that.   For example,  8,752,000 U.S. 
  military 
served in Vietnam and 59,000 died.  That's about a 1 out of 
150 
chance to be killed.  And there were 211,556 wounded...about 
a 1 
   out 
of 40 chance to be wounded.

Call him whatever you want but a coward is totally 
unwarranted.
   
   My response is probably pretty predictable, but when you kill 
and 
   maim 25,000 soldiers from the comfort of your armchair, 
*that's* 
   cowardice, on a breathtaking scale, especially then strutting 
  around 
   an aircraft carrier deck with tennis balls in your crotch. 
Sorry, 
   but the guy is a total coward and armchair warrior, a real wimp.
  
  
  Then what does that make MacArthur who oversaw 33,000 Americans 
(and 
  countless enemy casualities) deaths during the Korean War?
  
  And Eisenhower during WW2 who oversaw 292,000 American deaths?
  
  And Grant who oversaw several hundred thousand deaths during the 
  Civil War?
  
  And they ALL oversaw their wars from a safe distance from the 
  front...
  
  Were they all total cowards, too?
 
 I believe that the civil war death count was 437,000. Does that mean
 that Lincoln was a coward too?

When it comes to war, and sending men to their death;
This is never an easy task, and always takes it's toll.
Viet Nam, eventually killed LBJ.
Lincold died after the war, he was killed.
I don't think it's the numbers of died and wounded, although this 
certainly adds karma on karma...
But it's more a quality of truth...
That is where the real bravery comes in.
Anybody can kill, given the right circumstance, at least any good 
soldier...
But it takes a brave man or woman to speak the truth.
This is Lincoln's legacy;
The shear power of truth in his words, and in his vision of Unity.
Without Lincoln, and some of the other's;
There would be no United States of America...
If we hadn't invaded Iraq, on the other hand,
And if we had a follow-up plan after the fall of Baghdad;
Then perhaps Mr.Bush wouldn't appear now, as such a fool.
'A man who claims victory, prematurely, wears his crown to his 
demise'.
R.G.
R.G.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Amazon.com: The Maharishi Effect: A Personal Journey Through the Movement The

2006-10-04 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 10/3/06 4:18 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
  , Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
  

   I never heard of the TMO being thrown out. I was in the group
  (everybody at
   International at the time) helping to prepare for the Nepal 
trip.
  Maharishi
   initiated thousands with an earphone system. But almost 
everyone
  stopped
   meditating after a few days.
  
  Nice one Rick. Its a good example of how incredible distorted 
stories
  become when someone is addicted to rumours and loves to twist the
  truth.
  
 So what¹s the truth? Bless us, please.

Well, you where there personally so I obvously believe your version. 
Not Ingegerd's distortions.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] 'Britain Most Promiscuous Country in Europe'

2006-10-04 Thread Robert Gimbel



  Sex-mad Britons 'are ignorant about risk of Aids'Last updated at 21:11pm on 3rd October 2006  Almost a quarter of Britons think Aids can be spread by kissing  Headlines  Britain is one of the most promiscuous nations in Europe, and one of the least aware of Aids, a survey suggests today.   More than half of Britons polled did not use extra protection against HIV, and 22 per cent thought Aids could be caught
 by kissing.   • 'One in 10 men admit paying for sex'  Health campaigners said the growing ignorance was a result of government failure to promote awareness and poor sex education.   The Family Planning Association said: "We do not have mandatory sex and relationship education in schools and what does get taught is part of science. But it is not good enough just to talk about biology. Young people need to be taught how to negotiate using a condom."   The Eurobarometer poll of 25,000 EU citizens aged over 15 also found 40 per cent of people took no precautions against Aids during sex.   According to the survey carried out last year, fewer people in the 15 member states said they practised safe sex than in the previous survey in 2002.   It also showed half were poorly informed about the risks of HIV and
 Aids, with those in the 10 newest member countries the most confused. And a quarter of Britons said they were less likely to be promiscuous, the worst record after the Netherlands.  
		Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
   
 How do you know its faux enlightenment?

Come on Spraig, cuz they act like dicks.  If there was an
enlightenment, don't you think that it would at least include 
not acting like a dick?

(I know the movement line on this but I am appealing to the 
guitar playing Spraig who knows these guys are just pompous 
asses}
   
   Eh. I see guys acting just as their guru has requested that 
   they act.
   
   What's pompous about that?
  
  I don't think anyone held a gun to anyone's head, to wear a crown.
  Perhaps they like wearing crowns.
 
 It's a kind of peer-pressure gun. These are people
 who have decided that being close to the guru or
 (even sadder) being *perceived* as being close to
 the guru is the most important thing in their lives.
 
 This phenomenon exists in many spiritual trips. But
 in most of them, the guru doesn't make someone
 pay a million bucks for the privilege of being
 perceived as close to him. In the TMO, he does.
 And there are people who actually go for it.
 
 As a personal choice, I guess it's acceptable. But
 if you're suggesting that they're not *laughable*
 to have *made* that choice, I don't think you're
 going to find very many people on the planet who
 agree with you. The rest would consider these
 people fools.
 
 A question for Sparaig the Professional TM Apologist:
 
 Do you actually believe that Maharishi *respects*
 these people?
 
 If so, think that many here who (unlike you) have 
 actually had some experience being around him and 
 watching how he treats people would disagree with
 you. 
 
 I'd be willing to bet that Maharishi considers
 them fools, too.

You seem to know all the details of the millionares course. You must 
know that the techniques they received and the new programme was not 
worth the money for these rich people ! Right ?
Ot perhaps you are the fool.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: blast of shakti from the departing master

2006-10-04 Thread Vaj


On Oct 4, 2006, at 12:25 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:Time to test this idea. Kill all the self-proclaimed "holy men" and let's see how we feel. Would poisoning be OK?;-)
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Posting Habits in September -- followup

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
EXPERIMENT: Does knowledge of one's posting habits 
affect those posting habits? -- RESULTS

Since I said I'd post these results, here they are.
The totals on the left (before the ***) are for the
first half of September, and the totals (and some-
times percentages) on the right are for the second
half of September. Scores on the far right (past
the +++ signs for the top 11 posters) show how
much that person's posting rate rose or fell during
this period when we were discussing how frequently
some people post (and wishing some wouldn't). 


TOTAL POSTS 9/1-13: 1960 *** 9/14-30: 2070 +++ change
--
authfriend - 263 / 13.4% *** 219 / 10.6% +++ down 2.8%
sparaig - 244 / 12.4% *** 263 / 12.7% +++ up 0.3%
shempmcgurk - 145 / 7.4% *** 247 / 11.9% +++ up 4.5%
TurquoiseB - 136 / 6.9% *** 99 / 4.8% +++ down 2.1%
Rick Archer - 110 / 5.6% *** 69 / 3.3% +++ down 2.3%
new.morning - 89 / 4.5% *** 71 / 3.4% +++ down 1.1%
jim_flanegin - 80 / 4.1% *** 84 / 4.0% +++ down 0.1%
MDixon6569 - 78 / 4.0% *** 55 / 2.6% +++ down 1.4%
curtisdeltablues - 58 / 3.0% *** 87 / 4.2% +++ up 2.2%
off_world_beings - 54 / 2.8% *** 106 / 5.1% +++ up 2.3%
Peter - 53 / 2.7% *** 86 / 4.2% +++ up 1.5%
--
wmurphy77 - 52 *** 5
Robert Gimbel - 50 *** 54
Sal Sunshine - 47 *** 47
Paul Mason - 41 *** 3
t3rinity - 41 *** 13
nablus108 - 40 *** 18
cardemaister - 37 *** 44
Alex Stanley - 32 *** 33
bob_brigante - 30 *** 57
jyouells2000 - 30 *** 29
dhamiltony2k5 - 27 *** 18
geezerfreak - 26 *** 24
bhairitu - 22 *** 55
lurkernomore20002000 - 20 *** 16
Ingegerd - 16 *** 7
gerbal88 - 15 *** 2
hermandan0 - 9 *** 8
feste37 - 7 *** 6
gullible fool - 7 *** 6
George DeForest - 4 *** 1
Patrick Gillam - 4 *** 14
johnlasher20002000 - 4 *** 2
uns_tressor - 4 *** 5
kenwoodfx - 4 *** 0
Anna - 4 *** 2
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis - 3 *** 4
WLeed3 - 3 *** 8
blissbunn1 - 2 *** 0
inthislifetime300 - 1 *** 0
Nelson - 1 *** 0
suziezuzie - 1 *** 4
Dharma Mitra - 1 *** 0
rasatantra - 1 *** 1
--
coldbluiceman - 0 *** 45
vajradhatu108 - 0 *** 24
larry.potter - 0 *** 21
wayback71 - 0 *** 13
Jason Spock - 0 *** 12
shukra69 - 0 *** 9
Jeffrey - 0 *** 8
Irmeli Mattsson - 0 *** 8
Richard J. Williams - 0 *** 6
ffia1120 - 0 *** 5
Dick Mays - 0 *** 4
kaladevi93 - 0 *** 3
April - 0 *** 3
Marek Reavis - 0 *** 3
Mike Hutchinson - 0 *** 2
Michael Dean Goodman - 0 *** 2
elastomeric_brotherhood - 0 *** 2
hyperbolicgeometry - 0 *** 2
quantum packet - 0 *** 2
benjaminccollins - 0 *** 1
gimari03 - 0 *** 1
soulquest7 - 0 *** 1
Christine - 0 *** 1
artkonrad - 0 *** 1
Xunknown - 0 *** 1
--








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  This is very funny:
  
  http://www3.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=178
 
 
 
 Uh, which Republican are you referring to?
 
 Foley?
 
 1) He didn't molest anyone...
 
 2) Had he had consensual physical relations with the boy in question 
 there would have been no crime committed because the boy was over 
 the age of consent.
 
 I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are raking this 
 guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it was 
 speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as regular 
 users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.

Outraged that the smug, hypocritical asshole who helped create that
law is getting bitchslapped by it? You gotta be kidding!

And, actually, I'm not particularly outraged by that law. It basically
establishes 18 as the age of consent with respect to sexually explicit
speech between individuals on the Internet. I don't find that any more
draconian than a state age of consent law set at 18 or the law
requiring porno actors be 18.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
  It's a kind of peer-pressure gun. These are people
  who have decided that being close to the guru or
  (even sadder) being *perceived* as being close to
  the guru is the most important thing in their lives.
  
  This phenomenon exists in many spiritual trips. But
  in most of them, the guru doesn't make someone
  pay a million bucks for the privilege of being
  perceived as close to him. In the TMO, he does.
  And there are people who actually go for it.
  
  As a personal choice, I guess it's acceptable. But
  if you're suggesting that they're not *laughable*
  to have *made* that choice, I don't think you're
  going to find very many people on the planet who
  agree with you. The rest would consider these
  people fools.
  
  A question for Sparaig the Professional TM Apologist:
  
  Do you actually believe that Maharishi *respects*
  these people?
  
  If so, think that many here who (unlike you) have 
  actually had some experience being around him and 
  watching how he treats people would disagree with
  you. 
  
  I'd be willing to bet that Maharishi considers
  them fools, too.
 
 You seem to know all the details of the millionares course. You must 
 know that the techniques they received and the new programme was not 
 worth the money for these rich people ! Right ?

Not having been foolish enough to pay for such
techniques, I couldn't say for sure. If I were
to guess, I would imagine that the Return On 
Investment was similar to that of the TM Sidhis
(which cost $5000 or so, depending on when/where 
you got them) compared to the $5 paperback copy 
of the Yoga Sutras they were taken from. Using 
the same percentage (0.001%), that makes the 
million dollar techniques) worth about $1000.
 
 Ot perhaps you are the fool.

Very possibly. I did pay 5000 bucks for something
worth 5 bucks, which definitely makes me a fool. 
But I learned from that experience, and stopped 
short of paying 1 million bucks for something 
worth a thousand...if it's worth that much...








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  It's a kind of peer-pressure gun. These are people
  who have decided that being close to the guru or
  (even sadder) being *perceived* as being close to
  the guru is the most important thing in their lives.
 
  This phenomenon exists in many spiritual trips. But
  in most of them, the guru doesn't make someone
  pay a million bucks for the privilege of being
  perceived as close to him. In the TMO, he does.
  And there are people who actually go for it.
 
  As a personal choice, I guess it's acceptable. But
  if you're suggesting that they're not *laughable*
  to have *made* that choice, I don't think you're
  going to find very many people on the planet who
  agree with you. The rest would consider these
  people fools.
 
  A question for Sparaig the Professional TM Apologist:
 
  Do you actually believe that Maharishi *respects*
  these people?
 
  If so, think that many here who (unlike you) have
  actually had some experience being around him and
  watching how he treats people would disagree with
  you.
 
  I'd be willing to bet that Maharishi considers
  them fools, too.

 You seem to know all the details of the millionares course. You must
 know that the techniques they received and the new programme was not
 worth the money for these rich people ! Right ?

Not having been foolish enough to pay for such
techniques, I couldn't say for sure. If I were
to guess, I would imagine that the Return On
Investment was similar to that of the TM Sidhis
(which cost $5000 or so, depending on when/where
you got them) compared to the $5 paperback copy
of the Yoga Sutras they were taken from. Using
the same percentage (0.1%), that makes the
million dollar techniques worth about $1000.

 Ot perhaps you are the fool.

Very possibly. I did pay 5000 bucks for something
worth 5 bucks, which definitely makes me a fool.
But I learned from that experience, and stopped
short of paying 1 million bucks for something
worth a thousand...if it's worth that much...







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Is there no one willing to defend Foley's right to free speech?

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Freedom of speech includes the right to be sleazy and inappropriate.

But not to solicit a minor, whether over the Internet or
in any other manner.

 Why is there no one except myself willing to step forward and
 ring the bell of alarm over the eagerness of almost everyone to
 have Foley convicted of a crime over his free speech?

Shemp, relax.  I haven't seen anyone here endorsing
the federal law--the one Foley wrote and sponsored--
that sets the age of consent for solicitation over
the Internet at 18 when the age of consent for actual
sexual activity is 15 or 16 in some states.

And not even the FBI has yet determined whether the
federal law applies in this case, or if not, which
if any state laws apply.

All anyone is advocating here, at any rate, is that
*if* he solicited someone over the Internet who was
underage for actual sexual activity in the relevant
state, he committed a crime and should suffer the
appropriate punishment.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  No man, he was grooming the boy.

 Grooming him for what...sex?
 
 If it WAS for sex, and the two then went on to have consensual sex, 
 there would have been no crime because both were over the age of 
 consent.

In many states it would be illegal as the pedophile laws take into
account not only age of consent but the age difference in the
parties as well -- often if there's more than a 4 yr age difference
then the age of consent is raised to 18.  Apparently this is not the
case in DC though. And homosexual acts are still illegal in a few of
the red states that best reflect shemp's kind of mind.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Posting Habits in September -- followup

2006-10-04 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:28 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 EXPERIMENT: Does knowledge of one's posting habits
 affect those posting habits? -- RESULTS

 Since I said I'd post these results, here they are.
 The totals on the left (before the ***) are for the
 first half of September, and the totals (and some-
 times percentages) on the right are for the second
 half of September. Scores on the far right (past
 the +++ signs for the top 11 posters) show how
 much that person's posting rate rose or fell during
 this period when we were discussing how frequently
 some people post (and wishing some wouldn't).


 TOTAL POSTS 9/1-13: 1960 *** 9/14-30: 2070 +++ change
 --
 authfriend - 263 / 13.4% *** 219 / 10.6% +++ down 2.8%
 sparaig - 244 / 12.4% *** 263 / 12.7% +++ up 0.3%
 shempmcgurk - 145 / 7.4% *** 247 / 11.9% +++ up 4.5%
 TurquoiseB - 136 / 6.9% *** 99 / 4.8% +++ down 2.1%
 Rick Archer - 110 / 5.6% *** 69 / 3.3% +++ down 2.3%
 new.morning - 89 / 4.5% *** 71 / 3.4% +++ down 1.1%
 jim_flanegin - 80 / 4.1% *** 84 / 4.0% +++ down 0.1%
 MDixon6569 - 78 / 4.0% *** 55 / 2.6% +++ down 1.4%
 curtisdeltablues - 58 / 3.0% *** 87 / 4.2% +++ up 2.2%
 off_world_beings - 54 / 2.8% *** 106 / 5.1% +++ up 2.3%
 Peter - 53 / 2.7% *** 86 / 4.2% +++ up 1.5%
 --
 wmurphy77 - 52 *** 5
 Robert Gimbel - 50 *** 54
 Sal Sunshine - 47 *** 47

I'm the only one who's perfectly balanced...LOL...thanks for posting 
these Barry.  :)



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
snip
   Speach is not protected when it is in this context.
 
 Speech is most definitely protected in this context everywhere... 
 EXCEPT the internet!

No, it isn't.  It's a crime even to *possess* child
pornography, for example, whether obtained over the
Internet or in some other manner.  There are lots of
laws that restrict free speech in other than the
Internet context.

 Foley could have been chatting up this kid on the phone or at the 
 local bar, got him into bed, and there would be ZERO crime 
committed.
 
 It's just that there are these weird laws about the internet that 
 make what he did MAYBE a crime.

That's the federal law he sponsored and helped write,
which sets the age of consent for sexual Internet
communications at 18.  Most on the left recognize that's
absurd when the age of consent for actual sexual activity
is at least two years younger in most states.

The folks who *support* that federal law are mostly on
the right.

For an example on the left, here's an excerpt from a
blog post by Glenn Greenwald, a lefty lawyer:

...I will just note what seems to be the bizarre and incoherent 
contradiction in the law..., that in-person, actual sex between Foley 
and a 16-year-old page would be perfectly legal in D.C. and in most 
places in the U.S..., but it seems that it is a criminal act for 
Foley to discuss or solicit sexual acts with the same page over the 
Internet [this is the law that Foley wrote and sponsored--JS]. 
Despite all the irritatingly righteous (and overheated) pedophile 
language being tossed around, in the overwhelming majority of states, 
and in Washington DC, the legal age of consent for sex is 16 years 
old. That means that actual, in-person sex between Foley and a 16-
year-old page in D.C. would not be criminal at all (though it likely 
could have other legal implications).

But under the so-called Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act 
of 2006 (of which Foley was a co-sponsor)...discussion or 
solicitation of sexual acts between Foley and any minor under the 
age of 18 would appear to be a criminal offense (see Adam Walsh Act, 
Sec. 111(14) (MINOR.--The term 'minor' means an individual who has 
not attained the age of 18 years)

http://tinyurl.com/f8uyp

Note that in any case, there's no evidence that
Foley was actually a *pedophile*.  A pedophile
is a person who is attracted exclusively to
children under the age of puberty. Pedophilia
is a serious, apparently incurable sexual disorder.

Pedophilia is not a synonym for illegal sexual
activity (including communications) with minors.
It's a specific clinical diagnosis.

Attraction to adolescents past the age of puberty
is entirely sexually normal (and rules out pedophilia
as a diagnosis).  *Acting* on that attraction when
the adolescent is underage is, at worst, a symptom of
a psychological disorder involving terrible judgment
and poor impulse control; it can usually be completely
cured by psycyhotherapy.

Moreover, the damage to the child victims of pedophilia
is typically much more severe than the damage to the
adolescent victims of sexual predators.

This doesn't mean, of course, that the latter is
somehow OK; the harm to underage adolescents can be
pretty bad.  It's just that the harm to prepubertal
children is much worse.

Both are illegal, and rightly so.

 Now, of course, all this doesn't address either the sleaziness of
 it all and the fact that there are the considerations of his role 
 as a Representative that has its own sets of rules that he could 
 have broken (and probably did)...but those aren't crimes but broken 
 rules internal to the House of Representatives.
 
 Again, we ALL should be VERY concerned about the laws that curtail 
 speech on the internet.

I suspect all of us are, actually.

 That's really what this issue is all about.

It's also about the irresponsibility and hypocrisy
of the Republican leadership of the House--and perhaps
other congressional Republicans--in not cracking down
on a fellow congressman whom they knew was at least
potentially a sexual predator who could be 
endangering the psychological welfare of underage
pages.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Not having been foolish enough to pay for such
 techniques, I couldn't say for sure. If I were
 to guess, I would imagine that the Return On
 Investment was similar to that of the TM Sidhis
 (which cost $5000 or so, depending on when/where
 you got them) compared to the $5 paperback copy
 of the Yoga Sutras they were taken from. Using
 the same percentage (0.1%), that makes the
 million dollar techniques worth about $1000.
 
  Ot perhaps you are the fool.
 
 Very possibly. I did pay 5000 bucks for something
 worth 5 bucks, which definitely makes me a fool.
 But I learned from that experience, and stopped
 short of paying 1 million bucks for something
 worth a thousand...if it's worth that much...

Perhaps the perspective of the rajas differs from yours. How could
they not see it as a donation to a cause they believe in. If you have
10 mil+ and are in your 50-60's, and perhaps have no heirs, donating
portions of your estate makes sense, is a pleasure, -- and not a pinch. 

Those that look to spiritual things with a sherp pencil and approach
it whats in it for ME? are perhaps missing something.

 






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:37 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:

 I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are raking this
 guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it was
 speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as regular
 users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.

 Outraged that the smug, hypocritical asshole who helped create that
 law is getting bitchslapped by it? You gotta be kidding!

I actually wasn't aware that he helped create the law that's now netted 
him, only that he was chair of the Missing Kids committee.  THis just 
makes it too perfect.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  Eh. I see guys acting just as their guru has requested that they 
act.
 
 Just as an experiment, replace the word 'guru' in the 
 above sentence with other words, and see how you feel
 about the guys in question:
 
 I see guys acting just as their Daddy has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their Mommy has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their gpvernment has requested that they 
act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their priest has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their family has requested that they act.
 
 ...etc.
 
 If you are comfortable being one of those kinda guys,
 who has so little going for him that he just does what
 he is told without question, good for you. Some of us
 prefer to grow up and do what *we* want to do...

Er, without question wasn't part of either
formulation.

It's entirely possible to want to do something
someone has requested that you do, for any
number of reasons, and after extensive questioning.

What Barry seems to be suggesting is that you
should never want to do anything someone has
requested that you do.  Questioning such a 
request, according to Barry, should *always*
result in your deciding you don't want to do
whatever it is.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 So, tell me, who amongst you are FOR gay rights and support Foley's 
 right to have consensual phone sex and consensual gay sex with the 
 17-year-old?
 
 Com'n my fine feathered liberal friends...who's for it?
 
 Judy?

Of course.

Doesn't mean I *approve*, necessarily, but there are
lots of things that are legal that I don't approve of,
and vice versa.

 Bhairitu?
 
 Spare Egg?
 
 Barry?
 
 Your silence is deafening...

What are you talking about??  That question didn't even
come up until you asked it just now.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Is there no one willing to defend Foley's right to free speech?

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  Freedom of speech includes the right to be sleazy and inappropriate.
 
 But not to solicit a minor, whether over the Internet or
 in any other manner.
 
  Why is there no one except myself willing to step forward and
  ring the bell of alarm over the eagerness of almost everyone to
  have Foley convicted of a crime over his free speech?
 
 Shemp, relax.  I haven't seen anyone here endorsing
 the federal law--the one Foley wrote and sponsored--
 that sets the age of consent for solicitation over
 the Internet at 18 when the age of consent for actual
 sexual activity is 15 or 16 in some states.

A large majority of states (as well as most or all of Europe) are less
than 18. Only 8 or so states have the 18 year old level.

 
 And not even the FBI has yet determined whether the
 federal law applies in this case, or if not, which
 if any state laws apply.
 
 All anyone is advocating here, at any rate, is that
 *if* he solicited someone over the Internet who was
 underage for actual sexual activity in the relevant
 state, he committed a crime and should suffer the
 appropriate punishment.


Solicitation seems an odd term to hinge the law on. Is thus setting
up a meeting for coffee - after a number of chats  -- illegal? Or is
no meeting, but explicit sex talk illegal under such a  statute?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   No man, he was grooming the boy.
 
  Grooming him for what...sex?
  
  If it WAS for sex, and the two then went on to have consensual sex, 
  there would have been no crime because both were over the age of 
  consent.
 
 In many states 

No in a few states actually. Far under a majority where large age
difference raises the age to 18. 

it would be illegal as the pedophile laws take into
 account not only age of consent but the age difference in the
 parties as well -- often if there's more than a 4 yr age difference
 then the age of consent is raised to 18. 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Outraged that the smug, hypocritical asshole who helped create that
 law is getting bitchslapped by it? You gotta be kidding!
 
 And, actually, I'm not particularly outraged by that law. It basically
 establishes 18 as the age of consent with respect to sexually explicit
 speech between individuals on the Internet. I don't find that any more
 draconian than a state age of consent law set at 18 or the law
 requiring porno actors be 18.

Below is Attorney General Ashcroft praising Foley for helping to
establish the law.  It can be found on the Help Congressman Foley
Protect Our Children website here http://www.votervoice.net/groups/foley/

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 2002
WWW.USDOJ.GOV   AG
(202) 514-2008
TDD (202) 514-1888

STATEMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT ON THE PASSAGE OF THE
SMITH-POMEROY-FOLEY CHILD OBSCENITY AND PORNOGRAPHY PREVENTION ACT

I am pleased that the House of Representatives passed the Child
Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act, a bill that will strengthen
the ability of law enforcement to protect children from abuse and
exploitation. I urge the Senate to bring this important legislation to
the floor as soon as possible.

I want to thank Chairman Sensenbrenner for guiding this important
legislation through the Judiciary Commitee, and Congressmen Lamar
Smith, Mark Foley, and Earl Pomeroy for their leadership on this bill.
They have worked tirelessly to protect the health and safety of children.

The Department of Justice remains solid in its commitment to
identify, investigate, and prosecute those who sexually exploit
children. I look forward to working with Congress to see to it that
this legislation becomes law, so that we may continue in our efforts
to eliminate child pornography and prosecute offenders. 






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re hello

2006-10-04 Thread Nenad Kuzmanović



I had some expirience in our TMO, but more then 5 years I do my program and educate my children, so today I am not involved too much in what happened. I live in Istria ( has a shape like India )and was involved in a few big TM projects as a leader in my town ( cca 6 inhabitans ). Lived hereon the top of the peninsula is somethind special, because the nature here is something straordinary. Somebody told that Istria is one of the 7 places in the world for the fastest spiritual evolution... We tried to make here Maharishi University of Peace, but the church did everything to stop this project. And they stopped it, cca 7-8 years ago

In Istria and Croatia ( famous Dubrovnik project ) we had many international and famous Assembly of World Peace. 
Due to some people in America many people here are aginst America.My mother was born in America, many years ago, so Iam lookingdaily events in more flexible way... You in America have very, very big job to do...And we, out in America,must support you very, very much. Nenad


__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:40 AM, authfriend wrote:


 If you are comfortable being one of those kinda guys,
 who has so little going for him that he just does what
 he is told without question, good for you. Some of us
 prefer to grow up and do what *we* want to do...

 Er, without question wasn't part of either
 formulation.

 It's entirely possible to want to do something
 someone has requested that you do, for any
 number of reasons, and after extensive questioning.

You really think that people *want* to listen to that boring nonsense 
droning on for hour after hour?  Would you?

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Habits in September -- followup

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 EXPERIMENT: Does knowledge of one's posting habits 
 affect those posting habits? -- RESULTS

Before examining these results, there are two
other questions to be answered:

(1) *Should* knowledge of one's posting habits 
(assuming one doesn't already have knowledge of them)
affect those posting habits?

(2) Do comparative numbers of posts per week for an
individual reflect a cause-and-effect relationship
(or lack of same) between knowing their posting habits
and changing those  habits, or do the numbers reflect
their level of interest in the conversations that
happen to have been going on during the weeks in
question?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You guys ever attend court in the SCA?

Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?

No, how was it?

http://www.sca-recovery.org/






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   No man, he was grooming the boy.
 
  Grooming him for what...sex?
  
  If it WAS for sex, and the two then went on to have consensual 
sex, 
  there would have been no crime because both were over the age of 
  consent.
 
 In many states it would be illegal as the pedophile laws take into
 account not only age of consent but the age difference in the
 parties as well -- often if there's more than a 4 yr age difference
 then the age of consent is raised to 18.  Apparently this is not 
the
 case in DC though. And homosexual acts are still illegal in a few 
of
 the red states that best reflect shemp's kind of mind.



And how do YOU feel about those states where it is still illegal?

Do you support Gay Rights?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 snip
  So, tell me, who amongst you are FOR gay rights and support 
Foley's 
  right to have consensual phone sex and consensual gay sex with 
the 
  17-year-old?
  
  Com'n my fine feathered liberal friends...who's for it?
  
  Judy?
 
 Of course.
 
 Doesn't mean I *approve*, necessarily, but there are
 lots of things that are legal that I don't approve of,
 and vice versa.
 
  Bhairitu?
  
  Spare Egg?
  
  Barry?
  
  Your silence is deafening...
 
 What are you talking about??  That question didn't even
 come up until you asked it just now.


Precisely.

Why did it take Shemp to ask the question...you caring, tolerant 
liberals should have come up with the question -- and the answer -- 
on your own.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
 
 No, how was it?
 
 http://www.sca-recovery.org/

Hey Turq, Picking up chicks at these meetings would save us a ton of
money on bar tabs!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  You guys ever attend court in the SCA?
 
 Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
 
 No, how was it?
 
 http://www.sca-recovery.org/







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:40 AM, authfriend wrote:
 
 
  If you are comfortable being one of those kinda guys,
  who has so little going for him that he just does what
  he is told without question, good for you. Some of us
  prefer to grow up and do what *we* want to do...
 
  Er, without question wasn't part of either
  formulation.
 
  It's entirely possible to want to do something
  someone has requested that you do, for any
  number of reasons, and after extensive questioning.
 
 You really think that people *want* to listen to that
 boring nonsense droning on for hour after hour?  Would
 you?

I wouldn't, but neither would I rule out that some
others might enjoy it.  Different strokes, and all
that.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Is there no one willing to defend Foley's right to free speech?

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
  Shemp, relax.  I haven't seen anyone here endorsing
  the federal law--the one Foley wrote and sponsored--
  that sets the age of consent for solicitation over
  the Internet at 18 when the age of consent for actual
  sexual activity is 15 or 16 in some states.

(Alex just said he doesn't disapprove of the law per
se, but I suspect he'd find the inconsistency between
the federal law and the state laws absurd.)

 A large majority of states (as well as most or all
 of Europe) are less than 18. Only 8 or so states have
 the 18 year old level.

Yes, that's why the federal law is absurd.

  And not even the FBI has yet determined whether the
  federal law applies in this case, or if not, which
  if any state laws apply.
  
  All anyone is advocating here, at any rate, is that
  *if* he solicited someone over the Internet who was
  underage for actual sexual activity in the relevant
  state, he committed a crime and should suffer the
  appropriate punishment.
 
 Solicitation seems an odd term to hinge the law on.

It may not be the correct legal term; it was
intended as shorthand for the kind of IMs Foley
sent.

 Is thus setting
 up a meeting for coffee - after a number of chats  -- illegal?

I'd guess it depends on whether the nature of the chats
implies that a meeting for coffee would lead to sexual
activity (presumably after leaving the coffee shop).

In other words, solicitation, as I was using the term, 
means solicitation for sex.  If the chats were
explicitly sexual, it strongly suggests that the meeting
for coffee is a prelude to sexual activity in person,
or even a euphemism for it.

 Or is
 no meeting, but explicit sex talk illegal under such a  statute?

Apparently so, explicit sex talk being considered a
form of sexual activity (a la phone sex).







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread Vaj


On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings  no_reply@ wrote:  This is very funny:  http://www3.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=178Uh, which Republican are you referring to?  Foley?  1) He didn't molest anyone...  2) Had he had consensual physical relations with the boy in question  there would have been no crime committed because the boy was over  the age of consent.  I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are raking this  guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it was  speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as regular  users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.  Outraged that the smug, hypocritical asshole who helped create that law is getting bitchslapped by it? You gotta be kidding! While watching someone attacking their own shadow is a sure sign of lack of light/dark integration, it's often very entertaining to watch! Interestingly it works both ways, like when dire homophobes were observed while watching gay porn with devices that measured their erection responses. Oops! Ain't life fun.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  snip
   So, tell me, who amongst you are FOR gay rights and support
   Foley's right to have consensual phone sex and consensual
   gay sex with the 17-year-old?
   
   Com'n my fine feathered liberal friends...who's for it?
   
   Judy?
  
  Of course.
  
  Doesn't mean I *approve*, necessarily, but there are
  lots of things that are legal that I don't approve of,
  and vice versa.
  
   Bhairitu?
   
   Spare Egg?
   
   Barry?
   
   Your silence is deafening...
  
  What are you talking about??  That question didn't even
  come up until you asked it just now.
 
 Precisely.
 
 Why did it take Shemp to ask the question...you caring, tolerant 
 liberals should have come up with the question -- and the answer -- 
 on your own.

The question didn't yet *exist*, because Foley's
rights haven't been abrogated, and nobody knows
whether they'll even ever be threatened.

Medication time, Shemp.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
Some of this talk about how wierd this is and what mood-making!
sounds like stale gossip from a DAR meeting -- discussing anyone not
in their cirlce. 

Where is the undboundedness of awareness, and freshness of vision,
when one can look at something new (or uncovered) and simply say
interesting. 

Per the broadcast, I like the vedic recitation parts. And for me, I
find Nader and Hagelin's talks much more on point and coherent than
some of MMY's -- who is prone, IMO, to repetition and circular references.

I found the talks to give a nice vision. Its sweet. Maybe it will not
come to fruition. Maybe it will. Look back at it in 200 years. 1000
years. maybe it will all be dust. maybe it will be something. Possibly
something of value to the world. 

Christianity became a world thing out of what I understand was a small
chaotic group, floundering for several centuries. That is not to say
that all floundering things become great. Few do. But small and
floundering in early years does not disqualify it.

Regardless, its a nice vision. Whats your grandest vision? If its a
pitcher of beer next friday -- perhaps one should not taunt others
with more far reaching visions.

As for new or incovered/revived traditions, what approach would you
personally devise if you wanted something to effectively last many
generations? Your devision would prpbably be different -- but less
wierd? 


 






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Not having been foolish enough to pay for such
  techniques, I couldn't say for sure. If I were
  to guess, I would imagine that the Return On
  Investment was similar to that of the TM Sidhis
  (which cost $5000 or so, depending on when/where
  you got them) compared to the $5 paperback copy
  of the Yoga Sutras they were taken from. Using
  the same percentage (0.1%), that makes the
  million dollar techniques worth about $1000.
  
   Ot perhaps you are the fool.
  
  Very possibly. I did pay 5000 bucks for something
  worth 5 bucks, which definitely makes me a fool.
  But I learned from that experience, and stopped
  short of paying 1 million bucks for something
  worth a thousand...if it's worth that much...
 
 Perhaps the perspective of the rajas differs from yours. 

I would say that that's a given. :-)

 How could
 they not see it as a donation to a cause they believe in? 

I'm sure they do.

 If you have 10 mil+ 
 and are in your 50-60's, and perhaps have no heirs, donating
 portions of your estate makes sense, is a pleasure, -- and 
 not a pinch. 

You left out the part about giving up any semblance
of a normal life, but sure...it's their choice, and
I support their right to make it. I was only saying
that they're pretty darned laughable to have made
that choice, and I stand by that. 

If *I* had 10+ million bucks and felt like donating
some of it to a cause that I believe in, I think 
I'd manage to find a way to do so without having
to wear flowing white robes and a Burger King crown.

The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
laughable. 









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
Great topic to stretch my brain on. I understand your points better
now Shemp.   I had no idea the age of consent was so low.  16 year
olds seem like babies to me, so the thought of chatting them up seems
sick.  If the age difference law is true, that makes a difference legally.

I don't see Foley's behavior as having anything to do with gay rights.
 I don't think being for gay rights includes supporting toads like
Foley hitting on pages.  The gender doesn't matter.  One of the kids
from the transcript sounds straight, saying he just broke up with his
girlfriend.  That makes the conversation even more coercive in my
opinion. It was not a discussion between two gay people.  One was in a
powerful position, and the other was vulnerable to his abuse.  I don't
know any gay people who would support that.

Because he abused his power over these kids, Foley will fry.  I'll
bring the marshmallows.  I hear hot 16 year olds go for them!
 
(My political position is that I hate both parties equally)



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  snip
   So, tell me, who amongst you are FOR gay rights and support 
 Foley's 
   right to have consensual phone sex and consensual gay sex with 
 the 
   17-year-old?
   
   Com'n my fine feathered liberal friends...who's for it?
   
   Judy?
  
  Of course.
  
  Doesn't mean I *approve*, necessarily, but there are
  lots of things that are legal that I don't approve of,
  and vice versa.
  
   Bhairitu?
   
   Spare Egg?
   
   Barry?
   
   Your silence is deafening...
  
  What are you talking about??  That question didn't even
  come up until you asked it just now.
 
 
 Precisely.
 
 Why did it take Shemp to ask the question...you caring, tolerant 
 liberals should have come up with the question -- and the answer -- 
 on your own.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ 
 wrote:
 
  On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:40 AM, authfriend wrote:
  
  
   If you are comfortable being one of those kinda guys,
   who has so little going for him that he just does what
   he is told without question, good for you. Some of us
   prefer to grow up and do what *we* want to do...
  
   Er, without question wasn't part of either
   formulation.
  
   It's entirely possible to want to do something
   someone has requested that you do, for any
   number of reasons, and after extensive questioning.
  
  You really think that people *want* to listen to that
  boring nonsense droning on for hour after hour?  Would
  you?
 
 I wouldn't, but neither would I rule out that some
 others might enjoy it.  Different strokes, and all
 that.

I have been listening since yesterday. In background while I work.
(Yes, the shame! Divided attention and all).

I like parts. Whats on right now: That power is your Self. You are
heaven on Earth

What is strange or wierd about that? Its the message of every saint. I
find this new speak crisper and yet more openly spiritual -- with
lots more vedic references -- than the past. 

To me, its a cleaner, crisper vision and set of talks than many other
spiritual groups / leaders i have heard. 

That is not saying the TMO necessarily has the full goods, nor is it
a comparision between groups. But my sense of what the raja techniques
are -- holding and sustaining awareness of the welfare and blossoming
of an area at finest level -- is nice. I am glad someone, some group,
is doing that. Who knows the effect. Maybe its small, maybe its large.
 No study disproves either. But I like that the rajas (and
raja--eswas) are doing this. As I like that buddhist monks chant. And
christian monks go into silence and pray for the world. etc. 

Its all good. Why the mocking? 

 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: blast of shakti from the departing master

2006-10-04 Thread Jeffrey
Oh my god!! it really is true about the shakti thing. I just googled 
Babaji death 1984, the year I had my enlightenment. There were 
dozens of websites about this guru who passed the day I had my 
awakening, February 14, 1984. 
http://www.babaji.net/teachings-babaji.htm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I may have some personal experience with receiving a blast of 
shakti 
 from a departing master, but it may have nothing at all to do with 
 whether or not you are conscioussly a devotee, just whether or not 
 you need it and are ready to receive it. I had a profound  
 enlightenment experience, in the mid 80's when I was in Fairfeild. 
 It happened the morning of Valentines day. There were many months 
of 
 miraculous stuff leading up to it, and I kind of felt it was 
coming 
 about a week before it hit me. I remember at the time someone 
 telling me that a master named Babaji dropped the body on the same 
 day, but I have no idea who he was! Dont know a thing about him or 
 if it was even true, but it made me wonder. Anyway, after about 3 
 weeks I started to return to my ego dominated conscioussness, darn 
 it! But this makes me hopeful to get Maharishi's grace when he 
 passes, if that is possible.But I do think it would be entirely 
 irrelevant whether you were on some course or not. Only the ego 
 experiences time and space limitations in that way.When you are 
 ready, you are ready. And one thing I have learned for sure, extra 
 meditation does not help!! 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
   
... I don't recall of M indicated this  in that 
same lecture or if I heard it else where, that 
disciples of great saints often get enlightened 
when their master drops the body. So, if you have 
been regular all these years and have the 
opportunity to go to the course, My advise  
would be to GO!
   
   While this may be true, another view on this
   phenomenon, spoken of often with a smile in the
   Tibetan Buddhist community, is that this idea
   of those who were with him at the end got
   instantly enlightened and/or those who were
   with him at the end are the ones who 'really'
   know his 'real' teaching is almost always
   promoted *by those people*.
   
   The smile, in Buddhist traditions, is because
   such people tend to be the ones who try to
   *take over* the tradition of the teacher at
   that point, and use I was there at the end
   as their justification for doing so.
   
   It's a pretty well-known phenomenon in spiritual
   circles. I certainly saw it in the Rama trip, 
   and it is discussed openly in the Chogyam Trungpa
   and Muktananda trips. 
   
   It's just what happens -- those who hang in
   there to the end expect to be *rewarded* for
   doing it. And so they come up with stories 
   (which may or may not be true) as to how they
   were rewarded (I got enlightened at his funeral)
   or stories justifying the fact that they took 
   over the tradition (I was there at the end, and
   now the Master appears to me in my dreams every
   night and tells me the 'real' truths and how to 
   lead the movement).
   
   There may *be* some truth to there being a nice
   blast of energy when an enlightened being croaks,
   but I'm just mentioning this because (ahem) TM
   people seem to be blissfully ignorant of trends
   in spirituality that other traditions speak of
   openly and have gotten enough distance on to be
   able to laugh at. 
   
   When Maharishi dies -- whether it is next week
   or in twenty years -- my advice is to use one
   very easy criterion to judge such stories of the
   big blast of energy *as* he died. If the person(s)
   telling you the story is using it to enhance his
   or her own self importance, or to justify the
   position he or she holds in the new movement,
   remember to laugh.
  
  There may be some truth to this rumor about people getting a 
blast 
  of spiritual energy when a Maharishi leaves. I've noticed that 
  anyone who drops the body is easier to reach for a little while 
  afterwards- I've experienced this phenomenon when they are 
coming 
 in 
  also. 
  
  So if a devotee is focused on Maharishi when he leaves, there 
 could 
  be such an experience. Whether that results in the devotee's 
  enlightenment is dependent on the surrender of the devotee of 
  course. As we can see from the lunatics in Holland who still 
 refuse 
  their enlightenment not today, James...bring the 
carriage 'round 
  instead...
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Medication time, Shemp.

Is that a typo? Surely you must mean Meditation time, Shemp-ji







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 And homosexual acts are still illegal in a few 
 of
  the red states that best reflect shemp's kind of mind.
 
 And how do YOU feel about those states where it is still illegal?

I don't believe sex among consenting adults should be legislated by
the gov't.  The gender of the people involved shouldn't matter.  (I'm
not sure what I think the age of consent should be or how to handle
situations teenagers and adults many years older as I haven't thought
about it much until Foley time).

Back to main pt ... Right On to Alex's posts, and I wanted to
highlight another Greenwald comment that sums it up for me:

Mark Foley isn't some isolated case of shocking hypocrisy. Quite the
contrary. People who have a publicly and vocally expressed obsession
with other people's moral behavior and who want to use the power of
the Government to enforce that obsession -- the Rick Santorums and
Rush Limbaughs and Newt Gingrichs and Jim Bakkers and Ralph Reeds and
Mark Foleys of the world -- are almost always fighting their own
demons, not anyone else's. It is so important for them to parade
around as moral protectors and moral warriors precisely because they
have no other way to cleanse themselves, despite being in desperate
need of a cleansing...

We have been barraged with laws, programs, sermons, demagoguery and
all sorts of moral demonization from a political movement whose most
powerful pundit is a multiple-times-divorced drug addict who
flamboyantly cavorts around with a new girlfriend every few months in
between Viagra-fueled jaunts to the Dominican Republic. It is a
political movement whose legacy will be torture, waterboards, naked,
sadomasochistic games in Iraqi dungeons, with all sorts of varied
sleaze and corruption deeply engrained throughout its DNA -- all
propped up by a facade of moralism and dependent upon the support of
those who have been propagandized into believing that they voting for
the Party of Values and Morals.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Great topic to stretch my brain on. I understand your points better
 now Shemp.   I had no idea the age of consent was so low. 

age of consent by state and country
http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm

DC is 16.

I hear there is a teen (16 and up) SCA chapter in DC. Invite Turq over
and set up a grand tradition.

Perhaps not big draw for Turq, as 15 os AoC in France. 

Well then make it a bi-continental tradition. You could even have some
great bseball caps made for members. 

Great traditions have to have their funny hats.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Habits in September -- followup

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  EXPERIMENT: Does knowledge of one's posting habits 
  affect those posting habits? -- RESULTS
 
 Before examining these results, there are two
 other questions to be answered:
 
 (1) *Should* knowledge of one's posting habits 
 (assuming one doesn't already have knowledge of them)
 affect those posting habits?
 
 (2) Do comparative numbers of posts per week for an
 individual reflect a cause-and-effect relationship
 (or lack of same) between knowing their posting habits
 and changing those  habits, or do the numbers reflect
 their level of interest in the conversations that
 happen to have been going on during the weeks in
 question?

Statistics for the entire month of September:

sparaig -- 507 / 12.6%
authfriend -- 482 / 12.0%
shempmcgurk -- 392 / 9.7%

Between the three of them, they account for 
34.3% of all traffic on Fairfield Life. And
seemingly none of them feel that this is out
of line in any way.

Then again, I've met people with a $2000-a-
day cocaine habit who don't feel that they
have a problem, so at least these guys are
saving money with *their* addiction.   :-)








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Raja Pat Barrett

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
I heard on the MOU broadcast that one of the new Raja's is Pat
Barrett. From one of Doug's post -- long ago, I understood he lived in
FF for some time -- one of the horse property people. 

I knew Pat in the 70's -- over three locations and three eras.  I wish
him all the best with his raja hood. 

But I had to laugh. He is the last person I would have imagined
becoming a raja. Often penniless and scrounging when I knew him. No
family money that was apparent. No career  -- just sort of hustling
around -- this and that. 

Anyone know his story from the 80's on. How he made his money? Started
a business? Is he still married to same women -- I forgot her name?
Adventures with TMO in 80's 90's etc?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Amazon.com: The Maharishi Effect: A Personal Journey Through the Movement The

2006-10-04 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Amazon.com: The Maharishi Effect: A Personal Journey Through the Movement The





on 10/4/06 4:29 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 10/3/06 4:18 AM, nablus108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
  , Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
  

   I never heard of the TMO being thrown out. I was in the group
  (everybody at
   International at the time) helping to prepare for the Nepal 
trip.
  Maharishi
   initiated thousands with an earphone system. But almost 
everyone
  stopped
   meditating after a few days.
  
  Nice one Rick. Its a good example of how incredible distorted 
stories
  become when someone is addicted to rumours and loves to twist the
  truth.
  
 So whats the truth? Bless us, please.

Well, you where there personally so I obvously believe your version. 
Not Ingegerd's distortions.

I misunderstood. I thought you were disputing my statement that most of them stopped meditating.


__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
 DC is 16.
 
 I hear there is a teen (16 and up) SCA chapter in DC. Invite Turq over
 and set up a grand tradition.
 
 Perhaps not big draw for Turq, as 15 os AoC in France. 
 
 Well then make it a bi-continental tradition. You could even have some
 great bseball caps made for members. 
 
 Great traditions have to have their funny hats.


Excellent!  I wonder if having your girlfriend or wife discover that
age-of-consent link on your list of favorites would cause any trouble
in a relationship!

I think some countries have raised their ages in the last few years. 
The list seem pretty civilized.  But what is with girl on girl sex
allowed at lower ages in some places?  Very interesting site.  I was
shocked by the states with anti-gay laws still.  I'm guessing that we
can thank religious beliefs for this ignorance.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  Great topic to stretch my brain on. I understand your points better
  now Shemp.   I had no idea the age of consent was so low. 
 
 age of consent by state and country
 http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm
 
 DC is 16.
 
 I hear there is a teen (16 and up) SCA chapter in DC. Invite Turq over
 and set up a grand tradition.
 
 Perhaps not big draw for Turq, as 15 os AoC in France. 
 
 Well then make it a bi-continental tradition. You could even have some
 great bseball caps made for members. 
 
 Great traditions have to have their funny hats.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 Back to main pt ... Right On to Alex's posts, and I wanted to
 highlight another Greenwald comment that sums it up for me:
snip
 
 We have been barraged with laws, programs, sermons, demagoguery and
 all sorts of moral demonization from a political movement whose most
 powerful pundit is a multiple-times-divorced drug addict who
 flamboyantly cavorts around with a new girlfriend every few months
 in between Viagra-fueled jaunts to the Dominican Republic.

(Right-wing radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh, in case
anyone was wondering.)

 It is a
 political movement whose legacy will be torture, waterboards, naked,
 sadomasochistic games in Iraqi dungeons, with all sorts of varied
 sleaze and corruption deeply engrained throughout its DNA -- all
 propped up by a facade of moralism and dependent upon the support of
 those who have been propagandized into believing that they voting 
 for the Party of Values and Morals.

Which is why this current scandal is so important,
given its potential to make these folks realize how
empty are the claims of this movement's leaders.

Foley himself is just the straw the camel stepped
on and broke.  It's what his behavior reveals about
the leaders that their hypocritical propaganda that
is really significant.

(Greenwald's great.  But man, he does run on!)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Habits in September -- followup

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   EXPERIMENT: Does knowledge of one's posting habits 
   affect those posting habits? -- RESULTS
  
  Before examining these results, there are two
  other questions to be answered:
  
  (1) *Should* knowledge of one's posting habits 
  (assuming one doesn't already have knowledge of them)
  affect those posting habits?
  
  (2) Do comparative numbers of posts per week for an
  individual reflect a cause-and-effect relationship
  (or lack of same) between knowing their posting habits
  and changing those  habits, or do the numbers reflect
  their level of interest in the conversations that
  happen to have been going on during the weeks in
  question?
 
 Statistics for the entire month of September:
 
 sparaig -- 507 / 12.6%
 authfriend -- 482 / 12.0%
 shempmcgurk -- 392 / 9.7%
 
 Between the three of them, they account for 
 34.3% of all traffic on Fairfield Life. And
 seemingly none of them feel that this is out
 of line in any way.

Where is the line we are supposedly out of, and
on what basis is it drawn?

Notice that Barry carefully avoids responding to
or even acknowledging either of my questions.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Raja Pat Barrett

2006-10-04 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Oct 4, 2006, at 9:54 AM, new.morning wrote:

 I knew Pat in the 70's -- over three locations and three eras.  I wish
 him all the best with his raja hood.

You mean his raja crown--they're not wearing hoods yet, but that's 
undoubtedly coming.   And soon, too, to a wooded area near you. :)

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Raja Pat Barrett

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
I heard on the MOU broadcast that one of the new Raja's is Pat
Barrett. From one of Doug's post -- long ago, I understood he lived in
FF for some time -- one of the horse property people.

I knew Pat, periodically, in the 70's and up to mid 80's -- over three
locations and three eras. I wish him all the best with his raja hood.

But I had to laugh. He is the last person I would have imagined
becoming a raja. Though an energetic, vibrant and entertaining
personality, he was often penniless and scrounging when I knew him. No
family money that was apparent. No career -- just sort of hustling
around -- this and that. Thus in the last 20 years from really quite
nothing (no money, lite in major career/skill areas, no big prospects,
no big ambition other than crazy TMO stuff, etc., he made several
million+ apparently. Good for him. Maybe that TM stuff does work? :)

Anyone know his story for the last 20 years. How he made his fortune?
Started a business? Is he still married to the same women -- I forgot
her name? Adventures with TMO in 80's 90's etc?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip 
 The list seem pretty civilized.  But what is with girl on girl sex
 allowed at lower ages in some places?

Possibly because neither participant is likely to
get pregnant?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  DC is 16.
  
  I hear there is a teen (16 and up) SCA chapter in DC. Invite Turq over
  and set up a grand tradition.
  
  Perhaps not big draw for Turq, as 15 os AoC in France. 
  
  Well then make it a bi-continental tradition. You could even have some
  great bseball caps made for members. 
  
  Great traditions have to have their funny hats.
 
 
 Excellent!  I wonder if having your girlfriend or wife discover that
 age-of-consent link on your list of favorites would cause any trouble
 in a relationship!

Well she is 16 :) so no problem. She made me look it up to make sure
we were legal. She said kewl! when I said the state blessed us. 
Ironically, she's friends with Turq's 15 year old gf. They met on line.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
It is lower than the guy on guy action.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 snip 
  The list seem pretty civilized.  But what is with girl on girl sex
  allowed at lower ages in some places?
 
 Possibly because neither participant is likely to
 get pregnant?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If *I* had 10+ million bucks and felt like donating
 some of it to a cause that I believe in, I think 
 I'd manage to find a way to do so without having
 to wear flowing white robes and a Burger King crown.

But then you have established, it appears, that you approach spiritual
choices with a sharp pencil, asking whats in it or me?! Perhaps some
of the rajas long ago figured out that the me is insubstantial and
hollow/empty. 
 
 The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
 laughable.

Its quite grand to see such floods of compassion, always uplifting
others, never mocking or making fun of others. Clearly your mother
taught you well. And its wonderful to see how your Totality of
Wholeness prevents any mars of shadowself that might induce the
thought to laugh at others.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread Vaj


On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:17 AM, new.morning wrote:Some of this talk about "how wierd this is" and "what mood-making!" sounds like stale gossip from a DAR meeting -- discussing anyone not in their "cirlce".   Where is the undboundedness of awareness, and freshness of vision, when one can look at something new (or uncovered) and simply say "interesting".   Per the broadcast, I like the vedic recitation parts. And for me, I find Nader and Hagelin's talks much more on point and coherent than some of MMY's -- who is prone, IMO, to repetition and circular references.  I found the talks to give a nice vision. Its sweet. Maybe it will not come to fruition. Maybe it will. Look back at it in 200 years. 1000 years. maybe it will all be dust. maybe it will be something. Possibly something of value to the world.   Christianity became a world thing out of what I understand was a small chaotic group, floundering for several centuries. That is not to say that all floundering things become great. Few do. But small and floundering in early years does not disqualify it. I think it already has. TM was a major catalyst for raising the interest level for meditation period--TMers who went on to other forms of meditation, people who heard all the TM marketing spin and thought "maybe I should check out some form of meditation" or people who just always stuck with TM. TM's major contribution to this world may just simply be being "at the right place at the right time"--it might not even be TM itself, but the catalysis it's promotion and presence provided in collective awareness. In that sense maybe (as someone once claimed the Bhrigu shastras stated) Mahesh Varma is a minor avatar (1/16th of an avatar IIRC). Just a messenger, don't kill him. And whether one likes TM as their own form of meditation or not I think most meditators would acknowledge that mediation together in groups is a good thing--another trend the TMO helped inject into world awareness. It may just all be about nudging world awareness on these two topics.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
She said kewl!

Great line!


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
   DC is 16.
   
   I hear there is a teen (16 and up) SCA chapter in DC. Invite
Turq over
   and set up a grand tradition.
   
   Perhaps not big draw for Turq, as 15 os AoC in France. 
   
   Well then make it a bi-continental tradition. You could even
have some
   great bseball caps made for members. 
   
   Great traditions have to have their funny hats.
  
  
  Excellent!  I wonder if having your girlfriend or wife discover that
  age-of-consent link on your list of favorites would cause any trouble
  in a relationship!
 
 Well she is 16 :) so no problem. She made me look it up to make sure
 we were legal. She said kewl! when I said the state blessed us. 
 Ironically, she's friends with Turq's 15 year old gf. They met on line.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Brahmastan is so cool! (Lawwon's- Old Anoop Chandola Story)

2006-10-04 Thread coldbluiceman
 sparaig spare egg/Lawson English wrote:
 Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted 
 language of the Indian Courts properly, 
 or maybe I 
 simply can't understand your points 
(or both), 

Namaste Sir Lawson,
Then please allow to clarify, and give you the gest of the  
tired Old Anoop Chandola Story, and the fabrications of truth 
contained in Swami Shantanand's book -'Om Sri Jyothirmath'.

First of all:
(1) Regarding the will of Sri BrahmanandJi. 
None of the civil lawsuits were framed around the vaildity of 
the will.
 ..Thus, none of the civil suits in this dispute seems to have been 
framed in terms of contesting the legal bona fides of Brahmananda's 
will...
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html

The original lawsuit was brought by the founding trust of ashram
the- Bharata Dharma Mahamandala in Swami Paratmanand's name 
disputing Shantanand's fitness to hold the seat, and mal-
adminstration of the ashram trust. 

The side issues as the court stated-, particulars as regards the 
defect in the machinery for administration which had crept in under 
custom or rules which required rectification, were somewhat 
addressed.  

The court ruled that Swami Shantinand could not in fact understand 
Sanskrit language.
And, this is not a secular issue as you tried to point out. As, 
the sanskrit language was used outside of the religious connation 
you suggested so this issue was decided by the court.
Apparent to the court Swami Shantinand lacked demonstrable skill of 
sanskrit language ruled as such. And, the Court upheld the 
assertions of the Bharata Dharma Mahamandala.

However, by the *extensive current research* by Dana Sawyer 
Profeesor of Religion and Philoshpy at Maine College of Art and 
Vidyasankar Sundaresan at issue was- the fact Sri BrahmanandJi never 
clearly indicated his successor.

This fact was based upon few issues and *Legal Facts*- 
a. *legal Fact* the publication of the will, which surfaced weeks 
after Sri BrahmanandJi's passing.
Inspite of Swami Shantand's claim-,
  Item #1). A fully executed will of 
  Sri BrahmanandJi was deposited in
  Allhalabad on December 18, 1952. 
  (1st paragraph page 2 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath')

b. Swami Shantanand was a poor choice because of the *Legal Fact* he 
could not comprehend sanskrit nor the Vedas.
Inspite of Swami Shantand's claim-,
   He was completely qualified the hold the 
  seat as he was literate in 
  Sanskrit and the Vedas.
  (2nd paragraph page 2 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath')

c. At issue was the fact that Swami Shantanand was installed in Sri 
BrahmanandJi's gaddi by Brahmachari Mahesh and few friends that 
thought the will could be credible. As, Dana Sawyer Profeesor of 
Religion and Philoshpy at Maine College of Art has pointed out.
Inspite of Swami Shantand's claim-,
  Item #2). He was installed in Varansi 
  in the presence of hundreds of
  scholars from all over the country 
 (2nd paragraph page 3 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath')

d. At issue were the suspicious behavior and motivations of 
Brahmachari Mahesh at about the time of Sri BrahmanandJi's passing.
 ..In fact, the earliest doubts about the will left by Brahmananda 
Saraswati were linked to suspicion of the motives and actions of 
Mahesh Yogi (then called Mahesh Brahmachari)...
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html


 but it seems to ME that you're arguing 
 something that isn't supported by what 
 the court actually SAID as I quoted at the bottom 
 of this article...

The court did not rule on the question of the validity of the will 
that is your mis-understanding.
 ..Thus, none of the civil suits in this dispute seems to have been 
framed in terms of contesting the legal bona fides of Brahmananda's 
will...
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html

  coldbluiceman wrote:
 
   sparaig spare egg/ Lawson English wrote:
coldbluiceman sperino wrote:
 sparaig spare egg / Lawson English wrote:
  Jeffrey wrote:
  snip
Namaste Lawson Ji,
The same tired *OLD ANOOP CHANDOLA STORY* 
you rely so very heavily 
upon. 
It truly is something that after 35 years..,
 all you have is just one 
conversation  with Anoop Chanodla that 
has shaped your entire 
*Belief System* which soley based on 
Anoop Chandola's spuroius claims. 
That is truly sad!

The Anoop Chandola Story has been 
dis-proven by court documents and 
yet you ignore them!

The spurious claims made by 
Anoop Chandola regarding-, Guru Dev's 
hand-picked successor are 
easily disproven Lawson.

Simply by a review of historical facts of 
two items.., thereby 
nullifing your arguement of the legitmacy 
of Lil Mishmashi Brahmachari Mahesh. 
As you entire *Blind Faith Belief System*
is based upon the supposed 
relationship of- Shantinanda / Mahesh 
to Sri BrahmanandJi.
It is a fact that Swami Shantinanda made 
false claims in his book-
 'Shri 

[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
(Regarding Rajas)
 Do you actually believe that Maharishi *respects*
 these people?
 
 If so, think that many here who (unlike you) have 
 actually had some experience being around him and 
 watching how he treats people would disagree with
 you. 
 
 I'd be willing to bet that Maharishi considers
 them fools, too.

I completely disagree. I think that Maharishi deeply loves and 
respects the Rajas. They may act like fools, but it is still their 
right to do so, and better for them to work it out then stop it as a 
result of outside influences.

Personally though,as a form of inspriration and/or entertainment I 
continue to find it bring...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
I consider making fun of the Rajas to be my civic duty.  Blame it on
my youthful addiction to Mad Magazines.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  If *I* had 10+ million bucks and felt like donating
  some of it to a cause that I believe in, I think 
  I'd manage to find a way to do so without having
  to wear flowing white robes and a Burger King crown.
 
 But then you have established, it appears, that you approach spiritual
 choices with a sharp pencil, asking whats in it or me?! Perhaps some
 of the rajas long ago figured out that the me is insubstantial and
 hollow/empty. 
  
  The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
  laughable.
 
 Its quite grand to see such floods of compassion, always uplifting
 others, never mocking or making fun of others. Clearly your mother
 taught you well. And its wonderful to see how your Totality of
 Wholeness prevents any mars of shadowself that might induce the
 thought to laugh at others.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: blast of shakti from the departing master

2006-10-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Oct 4, 2006, at 12:25 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
 
  Time to test this idea. Kill all the self-proclaimed holy men and
  let's see how we feel.
 
 Would poisoning be OK?
 
 ;-)

What are you thinking of poisoning yourself with?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  If *I* had 10+ million bucks and felt like donating
  some of it to a cause that I believe in, I think 
  I'd manage to find a way to do so without having
  to wear flowing white robes and a Burger King crown.
 
 But then you have established, it appears, that you approach 
 spiritual choices with a sharp pencil, asking whats in it 
 or me?! Perhaps some of the rajas long ago figured out that 
 the me is insubstantial and hollow/empty. 

I honestly think you've got the equation backwards 
here. If I want to give away money, all I'm looking
for is to be able to do so while continuing to live
my life the way I want to. I'm *not* trying to get
anything for myself; I am, in fact, trying to give
something away, and then *walk away*. (In fact, when
I *have* given away money in the past, I've done so
anonymously, *so that* I didn't have to get involved
in any of the egogames that surround charitable
donations to spiritual groups.)

Compare and contrast to the Rajas, who (to their
credit) gave some money to a cause they believe in.
HOWEVER, they *didn't* give the money anonymously
or even quietly. They could have. But they didn't.
What they did instead was to donate the money in
such a way as to buy the right to wear flowing white 
robes and a crown and prance around at TMO functions
as if they were important. 

It seems to me that *they* are the ones you have a 
problem with, not me.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It is lower than the guy on guy action.

Ah...that is strange.

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  snip 
   The list seem pretty civilized.  But what is with girl on girl sex
   allowed at lower ages in some places?
  
  Possibly because neither participant is likely to
  get pregnant?
 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:17 AM, new.morning wrote:
 
  Some of this talk about how wierd this is and what mood-making!
  sounds like stale gossip from a DAR meeting -- discussing anyone not
  in their cirlce.
 
  Where is the undboundedness of awareness, and freshness of vision,
  when one can look at something new (or uncovered) and simply say
  interesting.
 
  Per the broadcast, I like the vedic recitation parts. And for me, I
  find Nader and Hagelin's talks much more on point and coherent than
  some of MMY's -- who is prone, IMO, to repetition and circular  
  references.
 
  I found the talks to give a nice vision. Its sweet. Maybe it will not
  come to fruition. Maybe it will. Look back at it in 200 years. 1000
  years. maybe it will all be dust. maybe it will be something. Possibly
  something of value to the world.
 
  Christianity became a world thing out of what I understand was a small
  chaotic group, floundering for several centuries. That is not to say
  that all floundering things become great. Few do. But small and
  floundering in early years does not disqualify it.
 
 
 I think it already has. TM was a major catalyst for raising the  
 interest level for meditation period--TMers who went on to other  
 forms of meditation, people who heard all the TM marketing spin and  
 thought maybe I should check out some form of meditation or people  
 who just always stuck with TM. TM's major contribution to this world  
 may just simply be being at the right place at the right time--it  
 might not even be TM itself, but the catalysis it's promotion and  
 presence provided in collective awareness. In that sense maybe (as  
 someone once claimed the Bhrigu shastras stated) Mahesh Varma is a  
 minor avatar (1/16th of an avatar IIRC). Just a messenger, don't kill  
 him. And whether one likes TM as their own form of meditation or not  
 I think most meditators would acknowledge that mediation together in  
 groups is a good thing--another trend the TMO helped inject into  
 world awareness. It may just all be about nudging world awareness on  
 these two topics.



You know Vaj, I wonder about the same thing when I listen to stuff
like this http://www.theendofsuffering.org. Dr. Russell Targ, remote
viewing instructor, writing about non-locality and non-duality, and
Dr. Jim Hardt using advanced bio-feedback to assemble the global mind.
 Two nights in a row on late night Coast to Coast AM nationwide. 

JohnY  






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
  curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   No man, he was grooming the boy.  Speach is not protected when 
 it 
  is
   in this context.  He was just dead wrong.
   
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings 
no_reply@ wrote:

 This is very funny:
 
 http://www3.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=178



Uh, which Republican are you referring to?

Foley?

1) He didn't molest anyone...

2) Had he had consensual physical relations with the boy in 
  question 
there would have been no crime committed because the boy was 
  over 
the age of consent.

I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are 
 raking 
  this 
guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it 
  was 
speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as 
  regular 
users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.
   
  
  Shempgurk...it   was ...
  UN  ...fvckin ...  ETHICAL
 
 
 
 Of course it was!
 
 What's your point?
 
 You want to throw someone in jail for speech that was unethical?  
 For sleazy speech?
 
 Think about the implications of what you're saying if you answer 
 is yes.


Propositioning minors is more than a free speech issue, however.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
Were all the pages Foley spoke to over the age of consent?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ...that sleazebags like Foley have the right to solicit males over 
 the age of consent for sex.
 
 Of course, Foley didn't HAVE sex with any of the males in question 
 on these tapes.
 
 But if he did and you, the reader, are for gay rights, you are FOR 
 Foley having sex with whomever he can convince to have consensual 
 sex with him.
 
 Now, if he is breaking a rule of his place of work when he does 
 that, that's another matter.
 
 So, tell me, who amongst you are FOR gay rights and support Foley's 
 right to have consensual phone sex and consensual gay sex with the 
 17-year-old?
 
 Com'n my fine feathered liberal friends...who's for it?
 
 Judy?
 
 Bhairitu?
 
 Spare Egg?
 
 Barry?
 
 Your silence is deafening...







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  Eh. I see guys acting just as their guru has requested that they act.
 
 Just as an experiment, replace the word 'guru' in the 
 above sentence with other words, and see how you feel
 about the guys in question:
 
 I see guys acting just as their Daddy has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their Mommy has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their gpvernment has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their priest has requested that they act.
 
 I see guys acting just as their family has requested that they act.
 
 ...etc.
 
 If you are comfortable being one of those kinda guys,
 who has so little going for him that he just does what
 he is told without question, good for you. Some of us
 prefer to grow up and do what *we* want to do...


Where did *I* say I was doing as my guru requested? I was merely pointing out 
that this 
was a scripted scene contrived by MMY.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 She said kewl!
 
 Great line!
 

I picked that up from Maria. She was only 16 when I started
following her. (Jeez and only 19 now. She seems mid-20ish, IMO)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Were all the pages Foley spoke to over the age of consent?

It's yet to be determined which age of consent applies
to which cases.  At this point, it appears he's in the
clear with regard to state law, but there may be more
IMs and/or emails yet to be released.

If the federal law applies (the one he wrote and sponsored),
those we know about so far were underage (18 is the federal
age of consent for sex-related Internet communications
between an adult and a younger person).







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hermandan0 no_reply@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip

 So when I found out about all this stuff about 
 King Tony getting his weight in gold, and Rajas 
 and gold crowns, it was really a mindboggler. I 
 think sometimes that those who lasted long enough
 for that kinda stuff to have become commonplace 
 don't understand just how weird it really is.


You mean like the proverbial frogs in the vat of lukewarm 
water over a continual flame where you don't realize you're 
done until your blood
is boiling and your brain is cooked?

:)
   
   
   Heh. Some of these frogs had to pay a million dollars for the
   privilege of jumping in the 
   pot in the first place. I don't think you can claim that they're
   being fooled on some level.
  
  Who said anything about anyone being fooled? The comments have to do
  with people being around long enough for that behavior to become
  commonplace, millionaires or not. BY the time folks were asked for 
  the million they'd been in there a long time already.
  
  Besides--the frog thing was a tongue-in-cheek throw away line.
 
 It was *also* a completely accurate metaphor for
 what's happened to these silly people. 
 
 If Sparaig weren't in Professional TM Apologist
 mode, he'd be talking about how brainwashed they
 are, too.   :-)


Er, no. I see a bunch of guys duitfully following a script laid out by their 
guru/teacher/
whatever. Some may believe in the whole thing, some partially, and some may be 
doing it 
simply because the Old Man wants them to.

Doesn't matter.  They're doing it specifically because they were told to.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 Do you actually believe that Maharishi *respects*
 these people?
 

dunno.

 If so, think that many here who (unlike you) have 
 actually had some experience being around him and 
 watching how he treats people would disagree with
 you. 

So MMY doesn't respect anyone around him at all?

 
 I'd be willing to bet that Maharishi considers
 them fools, too.


Nyah. He's well aware that there are myriad reasons to be doing as he requests.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
Well, if its due to a Mad Magazine influence, you get a total pass. My
whole family loved it. It was a regular Christmas stocking stuffer. (A
bountiful gift from our Lord, :))

The daughter of the publisher or editor (Gaines? comes to mind) was a
TM teacher. I think she said he did TM too. It was great talking to
her once about her dad. 


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I consider making fun of the Rajas to be my civic duty.  Blame it on
 my youthful addiction to Mad Magazines.

Turq:  
   The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
   laughable.

new.morning: 
  Its quite grand to see such floods of compassion, always uplifting
  others, never mocking or making fun of others. Clearly your mother
  taught you well. And its wonderful to see how your Totality of
  Wholeness prevents any mars of shadowself that might induce the
  thought to laugh at others.
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
  
  No, how was it?
  
  http://www.sca-recovery.org/
 
 Hey Turq, Picking up chicks at these meetings would save us a ton of
 money on bar tabs!
 

Eh. SCA chicks are known for many things, also, but no-one feels a need to 
create a 
recovery website for them.

 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 Very possibly. I did pay 5000 bucks for something
 worth 5 bucks, which definitely makes me a fool.
 But I learned from that experience, and stopped
 short of paying 1 million bucks for something
 worth a thousand...if it's worth that much...



It's an odd think the sidhis (and TM) are under-priced at the current rate.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 If *I* had 10+ million bucks and felt like donating
 some of it to a cause that I believe in, I think 
 I'd manage to find a way to do so without having
 to wear flowing white robes and a Burger King crown.
 
 The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
 laughable.


The rajas are the ones who are willing to give $1 million in exchange for the 
privilege of 
helping run the TMO.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
Nancy Berg, the daughter of the guy who wrote the Lighter Side of...
was in my class at MIU.  David Berg, nice guy I joined them for lunch
on a parent's day and it was like meetinga rock star of my youth.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Well, if its due to a Mad Magazine influence, you get a total pass. My
 whole family loved it. It was a regular Christmas stocking stuffer. (A
 bountiful gift from our Lord, :))
 
 The daughter of the publisher or editor (Gaines? comes to mind) was a
 TM teacher. I think she said he did TM too. It was great talking to
 her once about her dad. 
 
 
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  I consider making fun of the Rajas to be my civic duty.  Blame it on
  my youthful addiction to Mad Magazines.
 
 Turq:  
The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
laughable.
 
 new.morning: 
   Its quite grand to see such floods of compassion, always uplifting
   others, never mocking or making fun of others. Clearly your mother
   taught you well. And its wonderful to see how your Totality of
   Wholeness prevents any mars of shadowself that might induce the
   thought to laugh at others.
  
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Raja Pat Barrett

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I heard on the MOU broadcast that one of the new Raja's is Pat
 Barrett. From one of Doug's post -- long ago, I understood he lived in
 FF for some time -- one of the horse property people.
 
 I knew Pat, periodically, in the 70's and up to mid 80's -- over three
 locations and three eras. I wish him all the best with his raja hood.
 
 But I had to laugh. He is the last person I would have imagined
 becoming a raja. Though an energetic, vibrant and entertaining
 personality, he was often penniless and scrounging when I knew him. No
 family money that was apparent. No career -- just sort of hustling
 around -- this and that. Thus in the last 20 years from really quite
 nothing (no money, lite in major career/skill areas, no big prospects,
 no big ambition other than crazy TMO stuff, etc., he made several
 million+ apparently. Good for him. Maybe that TM stuff does work? :)
 
 Anyone know his story for the last 20 years. How he made his fortune?
 Started a business? Is he still married to the same women -- I forgot
 her name? Adventures with TMO in 80's 90's etc?


Perhaps he has a wealthy sponsor?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Raja Pat Barrett

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Oct 4, 2006, at 9:54 AM, new.morning wrote:
 
  I knew Pat in the 70's -- over three locations and three eras.  I wish
  him all the best with his raja hood.
 
 You mean his raja crown--they're not wearing hoods yet, but that's 
 undoubtedly coming.   And soon, too, to a wooded area near you. :)
 
 Sal



Well, there IS that ring of stones in Vedic City and the Celts and Vedic 
civilization are 
supposed to be closely related...

Oh! You meant KKK, not druids...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Being for gay rights means...

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
She was only 16 when I started
following her.

Corrected typo - stalking!


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  She said kewl!
  
  Great line!
  
 
 I picked that up from Maria. She was only 16 when I started
 following her. (Jeez and only 19 now. She seems mid-20ish, IMO)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  You guys ever attend court in the SCA?
 
 Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
 
 No, how was it?
 
 http://www.sca-recovery.org/


No...

http://www.sca.org/

Why did you add recovery to the web search? The term attend court should 
have told you 
that the most obvious URL was the correct one.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread Vaj


On Oct 4, 2006, at 11:45 AM, jyouells2000 wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:17 AM, new.morning wrote:  Some of this talk about "how wierd this is" and "what mood-making!" sounds like stale gossip from a DAR meeting -- discussing anyone not in their "cirlce".  Where is the undboundedness of awareness, and freshness of vision, when one can look at something new (or uncovered) and simply say "interesting".  Per the broadcast, I like the vedic recitation parts. And for me, I find Nader and Hagelin's talks much more on point and coherent than some of MMY's -- who is prone, IMO, to repetition and circular   references.  I found the talks to give a nice vision. Its sweet. Maybe it will not come to fruition. Maybe it will. Look back at it in 200 years. 1000 years. maybe it will all be dust. maybe it will be something. Possibly something of value to the world.  Christianity became a world thing out of what I understand was a small chaotic group, floundering for several centuries. That is not to say that all floundering things become great. Few do. But small and floundering in early years does not disqualify it.   I think it already has. TM was a major catalyst for raising the   interest level for meditation period--TMers who went on to other   forms of meditation, people who heard all the TM marketing spin and   thought "maybe I should check out some form of meditation" or people   who just always stuck with TM. TM's major contribution to this world   may just simply be being "at the right place at the right time"--it   might not even be TM itself, but the catalysis it's promotion and   presence provided in collective awareness. In that sense maybe (as   someone once claimed the Bhrigu shastras stated) Mahesh Varma is a   minor avatar (1/16th of an avatar IIRC). Just a messenger, don't kill   him. And whether one likes TM as their own form of meditation or not   I think most meditators would acknowledge that mediation together in   groups is a good thing--another trend the TMO helped inject into   world awareness. It may just all be about nudging world awareness on   these two topics.You know Vaj, I wonder about the same thing when I listen to stuff like this http://www.theendofsuffering.org. Dr. Russell Targ, remote viewing instructor, writing about non-locality and non-duality, and Dr. Jim Hardt using advanced bio-feedback to assemble the global mind.  Two nights in a row on late night Coast to Coast AM nationwide.   JohnY   Thanks, I'll add it to my MP3 player.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
   
   No, how was it?
   
   http://www.sca-recovery.org/
  
  Hey Turq, Picking up chicks at these meetings would save us a ton of
  money on bar tabs!

From Website:
 
Our primary purpose is to stay sexually sober and to help others to
achieve sexual sobriety. Members are encouraged to develop their own
sexual recovery plan, and to define sexual sobriety for themselves. We
are not here to repress our God-given sexuality, but to learn how to
express it in ways that will not make unreasonable demands on our time
and energy, place us in legal jeopardy -- or endanger our mental,
physical or spiritual health.

Curtis, over coffee, after SCA meeting:
Baby, my recovery plan is to take it one step at a time. If I can cut
down from 6 times a day to three, I call it a good day. I don't want
to repress my God-given sexuality -- even thought I don't beleive in
God --  but to learn how to express it in meaningful and authentic 
ways, glorifying God's abundance -- if he actually exists--- that will
not make unreasonable --- and who actually knows what unreasonable is?
--- demands on our time and energy -- I have had s much free time
lately -- You? --  or endanger our mental, physical or spiritual
health -- but I have been feeling SO healthy lately. You?









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
  
   You guys ever attend court in the SCA?
  
  Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
  
  No, how was it?
  
  http://www.sca-recovery.org/
 
 
 No...
 
 http://www.sca.org/
 
 Why did you add recovery to the web search? 

I didn't. I searched SCA.

 The term attend court should have told you 
 that the most obvious URL was the correct one.


As most would find my phrasing leading to humor. 
But not all, apparently.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nancy Berg, the daughter of the guy who wrote the Lighter Side of...
 was in my class at MIU.  David Berg, nice guy I joined them for lunch
 on a parent's day and it was like meeting a rock star of my youth.
 

Right. I think thats the one. 

He wrote more than Lighter Side didn't he? 

Did you meet Jack Kramer -- famed tennis player of the late 40's to
early 60's.  I grew up playing tennis with with a wilson Jack Kramer
raquet, as did the majority of my peers. Ken? Kramer, his son, was at
MIU in SB, and I blieve FF too. I think jack attended a parents day or
 graduation.




  Turq:  
 The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
 laughable.
  
  new.morning: 
Its quite grand to see such floods of compassion, always uplifting
others, never mocking or making fun of others. Clearly your mother
taught you well. And its wonderful to see how your Totality of
Wholeness prevents any mars of shadowself that might induce the
thought to laugh at others.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Gay Liberals.....but child molesting Republicans

2006-10-04 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip 
Which is why this current scandal is so important,
 given its potential to make these folks realize how
 empty are the claims of this movement's leaders.
 
 Foley himself is just the straw the camel stepped
 on and broke.  It's what his behavior reveals about
 the leaders that their hypocritical propaganda that
 is really significant.
 
 (Greenwald's great.  But man, he does run on!)

I forget who it was here who said this Foley thing is a dodge to 
divert attention from the crumbling Bush claim that Great White 
Father Bush keeps us safe from terror in the Homeland (God, I 
detest that word...). 

I think a calculation was made by Rove and the Republican leadership 
to sacrifice Foley since it appears the House will go Democratic 
anyway, and take the attention away from Rice 'forgetting' a warning 
from the CIA re: 911, and other incidents that have recently come to 
light regarding the ever more transparent facade of Bush's War on 
Terra.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
The whole counter culture owes a big debt to Mad.  I forget what
else David Berg wrote in Mad, it has been a while.  I remember
discussing with him the age that kids turn off on the magazine.  I
think its formulaic humor just stops working at a certain age.  The
magazine was trying to figure out how to raise the age.  To view
adults as hypocritical just hits the spot for a ten year old.

I don't remember the tennis guy. but I also played with a Kramer
racquet.  That is an interesting connection.  You should include that
little bit of tennis history in your next stalker chat with Maria! 
Unless I get to IM her with it first!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
 
  Nancy Berg, the daughter of the guy who wrote the Lighter Side of...
  was in my class at MIU.  David Berg, nice guy I joined them for lunch
  on a parent's day and it was like meeting a rock star of my youth.
  
 
 Right. I think thats the one. 
 
 He wrote more than Lighter Side didn't he? 
 
 Did you meet Jack Kramer -- famed tennis player of the late 40's to
 early 60's.  I grew up playing tennis with with a wilson Jack Kramer
 raquet, as did the majority of my peers. Ken? Kramer, his son, was at
 MIU in SB, and I blieve FF too. I think jack attended a parents day or
  graduation.
 
 
 
 
   Turq:  
  The fact that they didn't is what makes them 
  laughable.
   
   new.morning: 
 Its quite grand to see such floods of compassion, always
uplifting
 others, never mocking or making fun of others. Clearly your
mother
 taught you well. And its wonderful to see how your Totality of
 Wholeness prevents any mars of shadowself that might induce the
 thought to laugh at others.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread curtisdeltablues
Curtis, over coffee, after SCA meeting:
Baby, my recovery plan is to take it one step at a time. If I can cut
down from 6 times a day to three, I call it a good day. I don't want
to repress my God-given sexuality -- even thought I don't beleive in
God -- but to learn how to express it in meaningful and authentic
ways, glorifying God's abundance -- if he actually exists--- that will
not make unreasonable --- and who actually knows what unreasonable is?
--- demands on our time and energy -- I have had s much free time
lately -- You? -- or endanger our mental, physical or spiritual
health -- but I have been feeling SO healthy lately. You?

Nice rap.  But I'm thinking that in this group you don't need a
reason, just a location!


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
 curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
  
   Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?

No, how was it?

http://www.sca-recovery.org/
   
   Hey Turq, Picking up chicks at these meetings would save us a ton of
   money on bar tabs!
 
 From Website:
  
 Our primary purpose is to stay sexually sober and to help others to
 achieve sexual sobriety. Members are encouraged to develop their own
 sexual recovery plan, and to define sexual sobriety for themselves. We
 are not here to repress our God-given sexuality, but to learn how to
 express it in ways that will not make unreasonable demands on our time
 and energy, place us in legal jeopardy -- or endanger our mental,
 physical or spiritual health.
 
 Curtis, over coffee, after SCA meeting:
 Baby, my recovery plan is to take it one step at a time. If I can cut
 down from 6 times a day to three, I call it a good day. I don't want
 to repress my God-given sexuality -- even thought I don't beleive in
 God --  but to learn how to express it in meaningful and authentic 
 ways, glorifying God's abundance -- if he actually exists--- that will
 not make unreasonable --- and who actually knows what unreasonable is?
 --- demands on our time and energy -- I have had s much free time
 lately -- You? --  or endanger our mental, physical or spiritual
 health -- but I have been feeling SO healthy lately. You?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Did the Zimmerman's drop out of the movement also?

2006-10-04 Thread coldbluiceman
  Vaj wrote:
  coldbluiceman wrote:
 
  Vaj wrote:
  Samaya Sri Vidya does not require any
  externally obvious signs.
 
  Namaste Vaj Ji,
  Please tell me what exactly are 
  the signs of Sri Vidya?
 
 External ritual.

Namaste Vaj ji

Please tell me of this external ritual?
For example puja?

 Samaya practice is internal 
(i.e. you might not necessarily see such  
 a practitioner doing anything obvious externally).

Please tell me is this samaya the same tm-samya?

   Not
  finding a secret practice on a web site
  is no indication that it is
  not practiced,
  nor should we be surprised it is not practiced
  everywhere.
 
  Maybe, but you insisted Sri Vidya 
  was practised by Adi Shankara
  and at His established mutts.
 
 You might want to look at 
 what I did originally say:

Ok.
 
 Sri Rajareshsvari is a form of
 the Goddess worshipped in Sri Vidya  
 and popular in the cult of the Shankaracharyas. 
 A very old pagan and  
 tantric Goddess. 

i must politely take exception with your statement.
As when i *google* your Rajareshsvari name i come with nothing!!

However if i *google* the name i told you- Tripurasundari i come 
with 16,000 sites related to Devi Tripurasundari
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=tripurasundari
Results 1 - 10 of about 16,000 for tripurasundari. (0.58 seconds

 
  It has a long association with these traditions,
  esp. the
  southern seat.
 
  I gave you the link to the southern seat here it is again.
  Why not email the southern seat directly and ask them if the
  Shankaracharya there at Kanchi worships a sri yantra'??
  5). Kanchi mutt- here is the link go see if this mutt engages in
   worship of Sri Yantra
   http://www.kamakoti.org/peeth/aboutpeetham.html
 
 I'm guessing what's confusing you is that 
 they refer to it as a Sri  
 Chakra.
  FYI this is synonymous with Sri Yantra. 

No Sir. As i pointed out to you before.., when Adi Shankara 
presented gifts to Devi Tripurasundari at the temple in Kanchi. He 
gave Her earrings as gifts the earrings were called Sri Chakra.
Please check the wedsite i provided for the Southern Seat.
http://www.kamakoti.org/peeth/aboutpeetham.html

The worship(or devotion/bhakti) of Sri Devi Tripurasundari is 
related to Sri Chakra, and practrised in the Kanchi mutt. The 
devotion/bahkti done to Sri Tripurasundari involves puja(or Arti) 
and homage(or prayer) and RoopDhyana(or rememberance of Her divine 
form) and  does not involve secret rituals. 

The sri yantra are mandalas painted on concrete or stone or paper 
or made with sand-(as in the Tibetan Buddhist practice of sand 
mandalas) and involve a mental concentration on a yantra.

 Perhaps you might  
 want to look at the description of what 
 Adi Shankara carved into the  
 rock there (at the Sharada temple site) 

Where?

 and what Vidyaranya installed  
 at numerous other places.
 
 
 
  BTW, just a casual glance at itineraries
  shows participation in Sri Vidya rituals.
 
  Please- *Specifically Identify from those itineraries which
  are sri yanta rituals?
  I want to know what you are calling sri yantra rituals.
 
  I think you're just playing games.
 
  I think you are playing games, and attempting to get me stare at
  *VERY Artistic Mandalas* that my lovely wife 
  paints on concrete for
  celebrations at our local Hindu temple.
 
  Are those mandalas my wife paints 
  part of some sri yantra ritual?
 
 Maybe you should ask her?

Well on occassion i assist her, as some are very large.
However when the- frequent So. Indian visitors(some are pundits from 
the Sri Meenakshi) come to our temple they view her painted 
mandalas. While they comment on the significance of her manadals, 
they never ascribe any sort of worship to them!

  Just what FFL needed--another game player.
  Excuse me if you are
  actually ignorant in this area,
 
  Sir Vaj Ji,
  I am not ignorant.
  I just don't by into your whole-, tantric / shankaracharya / sri
  yantra secret rituals thing.
  I have been to 2 Shankaracharyas(1 north  1 south) and 2 living
  disciples of Sri BrahmanandJi Maharaj and 1 Jagadguru Acharya (my
  spiritual master).
  And, in 20 years i never heard of any secret teaching of sri
  yantra!!..i assure you I am not ignorant in these areas.
 
 LOL, what makes you think you'd 
 hear of a secret teaching? 

LOL, What makes you think they are secret teachings?.. i can 
find sri yantra worship on the internet right now!!

 Even SBS  
 sent ripe students elsewhere for 
 inner instruction in Sri Vidya.

Where did you find this information?

I have spoken to 3 living disciples of Sri Brahmanandji-(SBS) and 
none of them said anything like what you claim.
In fact if your are on the east coast- New York, New York you can 
look up a living disciple yourself- 
H.H. 108 Swami Vishva Hiteshji Maharaj.

  Its just these areas of yours 
  are highly speculative.

  but it sure seems like game-playing
  to me!

  Pranams Vaj ji
  Most politely, it sure seems like you 
  are a *Poser* / wannabe.


 And 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Is there no one willing to defend Foley's right to free speech?

2006-10-04 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 (Alex just said he doesn't disapprove of the law per
 se, but I suspect he'd find the inconsistency between
 the federal law and the state laws absurd.)

Yes, the inconsistency is absurd, and I think these kinds of laws
should set the age of consent to 16. But, I accept the nature of
different jurisdictions differing in their laws, and the Foley online
pervert law doesn't strike me as any more absurd or draconian than
previously existing laws.
 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Brahmastan is so cool! (Lawwon's- Old Anoop Chandola Story)

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  sparaig spare egg/Lawson English wrote:
  Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted 
  language of the Indian Courts properly, 
  or maybe I 
  simply can't understand your points 
 (or both), 
 
 Namaste Sir Lawson,
 Then please allow to clarify, and give you the gest of the  
 tired Old Anoop Chandola Story, and the fabrications of truth 
 contained in Swami Shantanand's book -'Om Sri Jyothirmath'.
 
 First of all:
 (1) Regarding the will of Sri BrahmanandJi. 
 None of the civil lawsuits were framed around the vaildity of 
 the will.
  ..Thus, none of the civil suits in this dispute seems to have been 
 framed in terms of contesting the legal bona fides of Brahmananda's 
 will...
 http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html
 

The District Court found that 
Brahmanand executed the will while he was
in sound disposing state of mind,
that respondent No.1 being one of the nominees 
under the will having   the prior claim would have 
been entitled to succeed as the
Head of the Math 


 The original lawsuit was brought by the founding trust of ashram
 the- Bharata Dharma Mahamandala in Swami Paratmanand's name 
 disputing Shantanand's fitness to hold the seat, and mal-
 adminstration of the ashram trust. 

It further foundthat 
the allegations with respect 
to the breach of trust by respondent 
No. 1 had not been 
proved,


As I said, one of us is misreading what the court has said...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientology In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]
ho (to their
 credit) gave some money to a cause they believe in.
 HOWEVER, they *didn't* give the money anonymously
 or even quietly. They could have. But they didn't.
 What they did instead was to donate the money in
 such a way as to buy the right to wear flowing white 
 robes and a crown and prance around at TMO functions
 as if they were important. 
 
 It seems to me that *they* are the ones you have a 
 problem with, not me.


They decided they wanted to be part of the decision-making process. The only 
way to do that 
is to be a long-term,  full-time TM flunky like Bevan or John, or to donate $1 
million and 
wear a crown.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: It's Official: TMO Passes Scientolgy In The Weirdest Cult Sweepstakes!

2006-10-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
   
You guys ever attend court in the SCA?
   
   Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
   
   No, how was it?
   
   http://www.sca-recovery.org/
  
  
  No...
  
  http://www.sca.org/
  
  Why did you add recovery to the web search? 
 
 I didn't. I searched SCA.
 
  The term attend court should have told you 
  that the most obvious URL was the correct one.
  

Top 2 hits on google are society for creative anachronism.

 
 As most would find my phrasing leading to humor. 
 But not all, apparently.


Obviously.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




  1   2   >