[FairfieldLife] Re: The Richard Enigma

[TurquoiseB]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
> Well, I actually nominating Richard as FFL "Person of the Year".  The
person who has made the biggest difference

He certainly seems to have made the biggest difference here on FFL. He's
got Judy "on the ropes," demonstrating how badly *she* copes with
someone stalking her the way she has stalked so many other people for so
many years. If some of the people she's driven off of the forum like
Curtis and Ruth and Sal and Vaj were still around, they'd be laughing
their asses off at how much she's squirming.

[FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[steve.sundur]

 "You do make me laugh though, you really do and I thank you for that"
 

 And that, my dear, is what we need more of.  Richard has a way of writing that 
I enjoy.  And let's face it, he knows how to push a button or two as well.  And 
isn't it fun, as well, to see what comes from that!  
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: State censorship of radio

[Bhairitu]

On 12/16/2013 06:23 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:


Re "There was a plan for hand-held digital TVs with a lower resolution 
sub carrier but it seems to have gone away.":


So we're moving backwards! We now have less freedom of choice.

My hand-held TV screen (Casio) was great for when I was watching a 
programme at home on my "stationary" TV and needed to "use the 
restroom" (Ugh!). I could take the portable and not miss the vital 
clue in the detective show.




Mobile DTV was the idea but defunct.  Beside the cost of high density 
panels have dropped.  My 4.7" phone has 1280x720 resolution.  There's a 
new scheme for the US.  The UK though has a different broadcast standard.


http://www.tvnewscheck.com/article/71507/mobile-dtv-is-dead-long-live-atsc-30



Re"I have data on my T-Mobile account which costs $30 a month.":

So you're now having to pay what you got for free with an 
old-fashioned portable transistor!





No, I'm listening  to shows that aren't being broadcast over terrestrial 
radio.  Folks here will tell you a $30 a month plan for a smartphone is 
very cheap.  I was paying $70 before and got only 2 GB of data a month.

[FairfieldLife] RE: 100 Great Rock Artists

[awoelflebater]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Richard started this thread "100 Great Rock Artists" to celebrate his 
favourite musical acts. It's striking that his choices only include one band - 
Jefferson Airplane - that has a woman. Now Airplane were one of my favourites; 
and one vital draw was Grace Slick. She wrote those wonderfully quirky songs 
like "Lather" and "White Rabbit" and her voice was not just great for those 
tracks where she was the lead singer but also for when she *just* supplied 
backing.

 

 Now I claim that women have a greater emotional range than men. If you don't 
buy that, you must at least concede that having a female singer in a group 
means you've got a greater vocal range than an all-male band. That being the 
case, it's surprising that more groups didn't have a woman member. Not having 
one is like denying yourself the use of, say, organs and pianos. Why not take 
full advantage of the auditory opportunities that are available?
 

 I think I'd rate Slick as the greatest of the rock singers (female division). 
She was at the same time both high priestess of psychedelia *and* the biker 
rock chick type; aspects which complemented each other.
 

 This track is s beautiful.
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh3SBp9qzTM 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh3SBp9qzTM

 

 I could go along with this. Jefferson Airplane were great. I grew up listening 
to them thanks to my older sisters. I think I was all of 9 sitting in my living 
room with the album going full bore listening to "White Rabbit". 
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Words of Wisdom by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

[wgm4u]

Yes, and "I am for happiness"! Duh!, what a charlatan! Like REALLY! Come 
Folks this dude is playing on your feelings, wake up
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


 by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3VSChReSqk 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3VSChReSqk

[FairfieldLife] RE: Words of Wisdom by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

[wgm4u]

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Richard Enigma

[doctordumbass]

Should have been Snowden, by a mile.

[FairfieldLife] RE: Fw: Fwd: Reincarnation humor.

[wgm4u]

Re-incarnation into the animal (lower) form is very rare but is possible 
depending upon the gross tendencies of the individual. Evolution, as such, 
suggests progress!
  
 Every lifetime usually results in spiritual growth!, even incremental; 
therefor unless a soul is exceptionally carnal, as to be exclusively carnal,  
they may be temporarily incarnated with an animal proclivity, in an animal form 
(very rare)!
  
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote: 

 
 
 
 
 
  

 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 


  
  
  
  
  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 why did I get this? 
http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/about?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5&id=f268220efb&e=5b8bf6a60c&c=5336ab8027
unsubscribe from this list 
http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5&id=f268220efb&e=5b8bf6a60c&c=5336ab8027
update subscription preferences 
http://batgap.us2.list-manage.com/profile?u=62b7e50ba8598f35e2edf91d5&id=f268220efb&e=5b8bf6a60c
 
 
 




 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[wgm4u]

Doubtful...
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Origin of the Domes:
 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/09/Under_the_Dome_Final.jpg 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/09/Under_the_Dome_Final.jpg

[FairfieldLife] RE: 100 Great Rock Artists

[doctordumbass]

S3, I remember this album really well - thinking back, my dad was quite 
tolerant when I'd crank up the, "up against the wall...", part, on my JVC 
"portable" turntable stereo, with detachable 3w speakers. 

Chrissie Hynde and the Pretenders, Heart, Fleetwood Mac, Janis Joplin, Enya, 
Annie Lennox, Pat Benatar, Natalie Merchant, B-52s, Talking Heads - all 
excellent. 

[FairfieldLife] Yoga room at O'Hare

[Rick Archer]

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, December 11, 2013   
(Today  ): Chicago's O'Hare International, one of the 
country's busiest and most stressful airports, took a decidedly Zen turn today 
  with the opening of a yoga room in Terminal 3, adjacent to 
the airport's indoor urban garden. "The yoga room provides a space for yoga 
practice as well as a place to relax or meditate," said Rosemarie Andolini, 
Chicago Department of Aviation commissioner. "This is yet another amenity to 
help make the travel experience at O'Hare 'best-in-class.'" 

O'Hare's yoga room has a sustainable bamboo wood floor, floor-to-ceiling 
mirrors along one wall, exercise mats and an area to store personal articles 
and garments. A wall-mounted video monitor plays soothing sounds and displays 
yoga exercise techniques and images of nature. And to provide privacy and let 
in natural light, there are frosted windows along one side of the room. 

"The importance of exercise and the opportunity in clearing the mind and body 
during long travel days cannot be overstated as it relates to one's health," 
said Brad Jersey, CEO and founder of nLIVEn Health, a company that brings 
sponsored, interactive health care campaigns into airports. "We know from our 
studies that 75 percent of frequent fliers participate in some workout regimen, 
so this is a perfect complement at ORD." 

The yoga room at Chicago's O'Hare airport continues a trend begun by San 
Francisco International Airport in January 2012, when it opened the world's 
first yoga room at an airport. Located in the refurbished Terminal 2. Yoga 
rooms can also be found at airports in Dallas, San Francisco and Burlington, 
Vt. 

 

   

   

   

      

  

[FairfieldLife] Are you more intelligent than Seraphita?

[s3raphita]

Only Connect is a BBC quiz show presented by dominatrix Victoria Coren 
(Mitchell) in which teams compete in a tournament of finding connections 
between seemingly unrelated clues. What distinguishes it from other quiz shows 
is that it's essentially only winnable for those for whom *lateral thinking* 
comes easy. Yes, you also need to know a great deal across a wide spectrum of 
fields but its demands on the contestants really take you into the Twilight 
Zone.

 

 It's developed a cult following. I watch it with fascination. I usually only 
get one or two answers; very rarely I get three right. (How come I don't fare 
better when I contact the field of Creative Intelligence and unbounded bliss 
every day for 20 minutes?) 
 

 So why do I bother watching the show? I think it's because I find it 
reassuring to know there are so many other people in the world that are so much 
brighter than me! Maybe they should be running the country rather than the 
self-absorbed, narrow-minded,  half-wit politicians we've been saddled with.
 

 See if you can do better than me . . . Good luck!
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNcBvU6YG2Q 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNcBvU6YG2Q

 

 

[FairfieldLife] Words of Wisdom by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

[yifuxero]

by Sri Sri Ravi Shankar 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3VSChReSqk 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3VSChReSqk

[FairfieldLife] RE: 100 Great Rock Artists

[s3raphita]

Richard started this thread "100 Great Rock Artists" to celebrate his favourite 
musical acts. It's striking that his choices only include one band - Jefferson 
Airplane - that has a woman. Now Airplane were one of my favourites; and one 
vital draw was Grace Slick. She wrote those wonderfully quirky songs like 
"Lather" and "White Rabbit" and her voice was not just great for those tracks 
where she was the lead singer but also for when she *just* supplied backing.

 

 Now I claim that women have a greater emotional range than men. If you don't 
buy that, you must at least concede that having a female singer in a group 
means you've got a greater vocal range than an all-male band. That being the 
case, it's surprising that more groups didn't have a woman member. Not having 
one is like denying yourself the use of, say, organs and pianos. Why not take 
full advantage of the auditory opportunities that are available?
 

 I think I'd rate Slick as the greatest of the rock singers (female division). 
She was at the same time both high priestess of psychedelia *and* the biker 
rock chick type; aspects which complemented each other.
 

 This track is s beautiful.
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh3SBp9qzTM 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh3SBp9qzTM

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Music for Yoga and Meditation

[Richard Williams]

Riley Lee

[image: Inline image 1]

Photos taken at Strybing Arboretum Botanical Gardens in Golden Gate Park,
San Francisco.

Three Meditations - From the album Oriental Sunrise
http://youtu.be/u3VAqPfZjgI


On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

> Pandit Hariprasad Chaurasia
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Listening to this music neutralizes stress and promotes happiness,
> harmony, peace and balance in your life and in the environment.
>
> Maharishi Gandharva Veda (Raga Marwa)
> http://youtu.be/HDcUvUfMs-M
>
> The Bamboo flute (bansuri) in both India and Japan is considered to be the
> original musical instrument, and is noted for being closest to the human
> singing voice. The richness from the fine nuances of pitch is accomplished
> by a subtle blowing technique and by partially covering the seven to eight
> finger holes. Each flute can only play in one scale.
>
> Pandit Hariprasad Chaurasia, born 1938, is an acknoweldged Bansuri master.
> In 1981, in recognition of his outstanding contribution to music, he was
> given the National Indian Award of the Sangeet Natak Academy in New Delhi.
> In 1990, Hari Prasad Chaurasia received the Gaurav Puraskar, one of the
> most prestigious awards, from the State Government of Maharashtra, India.
> He also
> received from the President of India, the coveted Padmabhushan award.
>
> Press Reviews:
>
> "...full of life, rhythm and vocal inflections, charged by the spirit of
> true improvisation." - Washington Post
>
> "...improvisations that sizzle without ever losing elegance." - The
> Village Voice
>
> "Beauty, order and perfection exists at every level of creation.
> Ghandharva-Ved Music makes everything fit together in one incredible unity.
> The 'Flying Beyond" CD by Hariprasad Chaurasia is a transcendental
> experience. Very highly recommended!
>
> Music for deep relaxation and integration of body and mind:
> http://www.maharishi-gandharva-veda.de/
>
> Also recommended:
>
> North Indian classical music performed on the bamboo flute.  Rag Malkauns,
> a haunting late night raga perfect for meditation and relaxation:
>
> "Flying Beyond"
> By Hariprasad Chaurasia
> Improvisations on Bansuri
> (CD AV-89004)
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> Available from 'Eternal Music'
> P.O. Box 3612
> San Rafael, CA. 94912
> http://www.eternalmusic.com/
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
>
>>  Riley Lee
>>
>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>
>> Satori - Riley Lee and Gabriel Lee (Satori)
>> http://youtu.be/lP6Xd86uaOw
>>
>> Riley Lee is the first non-Japanese person to attain the rank of Dai
>> Shihan (grand master) in the shakuhachi tradition. Lee holds a BA and MA
>> from the University of Hawaii, and he received his Ph.D. in Ethnomusicology
>> from the University of Sydney. We attended a Lee performance in San Antonio
>> in 2003. Lee is from Plainview,Texas.
>>
>
>

[FairfieldLife] RE: Thespian -hero , raising hell and standardPeter O'Toole

[awoelflebater]

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 There are stories that film-colour trickery was used to enhance the blue of 
Peter's eyes in the close-ups for Lawrence of Arabia. After seeing O'Toole in 
flowing robes, Noël Coward quipped: "If you'd been any prettier, it would have 
been Florence of Arabia."
 

 Pretty indeed. Florence, Lawrence or Or-ance, I love them all.

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[yifuxero]

Origin of the Domes:
 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/09/Under_the_Dome_Final.jpg 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/09/Under_the_Dome_Final.jpg

[FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Mon 16-Dec-13 00:15:04 UTC

[awoelflebater]

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 For the record, there are only two respondents on this list that attend 
regular meditation sessions in the dome. There is one respondent that has never 
tried TM. At least three of the current respondents on this list do not 
meditate at all, and two are self-proclaimed atheists. There are no Buddhists 
on this list, as far as I can tell. There is only one person on this list that 
is from Texas - the one you post derogatory references to in an attempt to 
smear. That's what I think. 
 
 If I am mistaken, please let me know. If there are any others that consider 
themselves to be on a spiritual path, please post your path here, so we can 
discuss it. Thanks.
 

 Ricardo, this shtick is starting to get old. I am just not feelin' it anymore. 
You know what I'm talkin' about. It is time to move on to the next imaginary 
persona that you have a hankerin' to adopt. This is enough now. Start your own 
forum, distribute the membership cards to Whackoville but count me out. You're 
starting to get a bit scary. Has Rita noticed anything amiss?
 
 
 On 12/16/2013 8:58 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
   Dear Buck. This forum is a beautiful example of all the spirituality the 
average human being on this planet can muster - and these are people who have 
meditated or are still meditating and pursuing what they like to think of as a 
spiritual and informed life. You need to understand this and accept it. 
Although I don't consider myself a pessimist I do understand human nature for 
what it can be in its finest and its lowest moments. TM, Buddhism or attending 
the Dome regularly doesn't appear to allow most people here to transcend the 
petty squabbles and deep differences that characterize the rest of the world - 
even those from that special place we call "Texas" are not immune from 
exhibiting these less-than-charitable traits.
 
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: State censorship of radio

[s3raphita]

Re "There was a plan for hand-held digital TVs with a lower resolution sub 
carrier but it seems to have gone away.":

 So we're moving backwards! We now have less freedom of choice. 
 My hand-held TV screen (Casio) was great for when I was watching a programme 
at home on my "stationary" TV and needed to "use the restroom" (Ugh!). I could 
take the portable and not miss the vital clue in the detective show.

 

 Re "I have data on my T-Mobile account which costs $30 a month.":

 
 So you're now having to pay what you got for free with an old-fashioned 
portable transistor!
 

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Paul Desmond

[image: Inline image 2]

Desmond Blue 1961
http://youtu.be/n-y8AgX4fVY

Paul Desmond was an American jazz alto saxophonist and composer, born in
San Francisco, best known for the work he did in the Dave Brubeck Quartet
and for penning that group's greatest hit, "Take Five". Desmond recorded
the tune "Summertime" along with many others during his time with Chet
Baker. This album on Vinyl RCA Victor, Desmond Blue, is in my record
collection.

[image: Inline image 1]

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Desmond

'Cats of Any Color: Jazz Black and White'
by Gene Lees
Da Capo Press, 2001
pp. 55–57


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

> Rahsaan Roland Kirk
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> We Free Kings - 1961
> http://youtu.be/Mk0mSclnUQQ
>
> Roland Kirk - Tenor Saxophone, Manzello, Flute, Stritch
> Hank Jones - Piano
> Wendell Marshall - Bass
> Charlie Persip - Drums
>
> Rahsaan Roland Kirk was a blind American jazz improvisation,
> multi-instrumentalist who played tenor saxophone, flute, stritch, and many
> other instruments, sometimes all at the same time. His music was intricate,
> powerful jazz with a strong feel for the blues. At a live performance at
> Ronnie Scott's club in London he even managed to play two instruments AFTER
> he had a stroke which paralyzed his left side. Virtuoso guitarist Jimi
> Hendrix "idolized" Kirk, and even hoped to collaborate with him one day.
> Another great album by Kirk: Rip, Rig & Panic.
>
> Read more:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahsaan_Roland_Kirk
>
> 'Bright Moments. The Life and Legacy of Rahsaan Roland Kirk'
> by John: Kruth
> Welcome Rain Publishers, New York 2000
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
>
>> Pancho Sanchez
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Besame Mamá  - from the album Conga Blue 1995
>> http://youtu.be/RY09gprbU20
>>
>> Poncho Sanchez, one of the top American percussionists of our time, is a
>> Mexican-American conguero (conga player), Latin jazz band leader, and salsa
>> singer. Sanchez and his ensemble won the Grammy Award for Best Latin Jazz
>> Album. He has played with Mongo Santamaria, Hugh Masekela and Cal Tjader.
>> The youngest of eleven children, Poncho Sanchez was born in Laredo, Texas.
>>
>> Read more:
>>
>> List of the Top 500 Drummers:
>> http://www.drummerworld.com/drummers/Poncho_Sanchez.html
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Richard Williams 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Cal Tjader
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>>
>>> Several Shades of Jade - The Fakir 1963
>>> http://youtu.be/8AU_91XRstM
>>>
>>> Produced by Lalo Shifren
>>>
>>> Cal Tjader - vibes
>>> Jimmy Raney - guitar
>>> Dick Hyman - organ
>>> Lonnie Hewitt - piano
>>> Bob Bushnell - fretless electric bass
>>> Johnny Rae - drums.
>>>
>>> Cal Tjader grew up in the San Francisco Bay area where he often played
>>> with Paul Desmond and Dave Brubeck. Later in New York City, he played with
>>> Mongo Santamaría, Willie Bobo, and Gábor Szabó. Tjader played the
>>> vibraphone and is known primarily as a Latin/Jazz performer. One of his
>>> most famous albums is called El Ritmo Cliente on Fantasy (red vinyl). He
>>> was also accomplished on the drums, bongos, congas, timpani, and the piano.
>>> He won a Grammy in 1980.
>>>
>>> I used to have this album on vinyl, Several Shades of Jade, on Verve,
>>> which I bought new in 1963, but it is now missing from my collection (Jack
>>> are you reading this). So, I bought the CD which has two albums on it:
>>> Several Shades of Jade and Breeze From the East. Tjader discovered and
>>> groomed Poncho Sanchez, another latin jazz favorite of mine. A lot of
>>> people don't like fusion jazz, but I do. Go figure.
>>>
>>> Read more:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cal_Tjader
>>>
>>> 'Latin Jazz: The First of the Fusions'
>>> by John Storm Roberts
>>> Schirmer Books, 1999
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Thelonious Monk

 [image: Inline image 1]

 Monk's Dream 1963
 http://youtu.be/FxailNkhpXs

 Thelonious Monk - piano
 Charlie Rouse - tenor sax
 John Ore - bass
 Frankie Dunlop - drums

 According to Kelley, Thelonious Monk was born December 28, 1917, in
 Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Monk is considered one of the giants of
 American music. Monk's Dream is the first album Monk released on Columbia
 Records. I still have my original vinyl copy on Columbia Records and the
 new CD (CK 40786). The song “Bye-Ya” clocks in at 6:03. The 2002
 re-mastered edition on the Columbia/Legacy imprint (CK 63536) contains a
 version which runs only 5.25.

 Read more:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk

 'Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original'
 by Robin D. Kelley
 JR Books, 2010
 p, 13


 On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Richard Williams >>> > wrote:

> Miles Davis
>
> [image: In

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[awoelflebater]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 This is an example of ankle-biting. Neither Judy nor Ann know whether or not I 
am suffering and neither of them care, anyway. All they care about is their own 
egos - they are not fit to debate in a fair and balanced manner. That's what I 
think - they are both ankle-biters and mean.
 

 Ricardo, you are just getting better and better, you are off the charts in 
fact. And you know what is sooo funny about this? Only a few of us know what 
you are up to and it ain't Share or Stevie. We'll keep it our secret okay buddy?
 
 On 12/16/2013 8:57 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
   
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think of 
what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. I don't 
think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style and amount. 
Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and some people 
won't. You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, 
I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 
100 great rock stars, etc. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to 
FFL. IMHO (-:
 
 
 Sorry, I couldn't resist. Share, FYI, Ricky is not "suffering" and you know 
it. OK, moving on (it won't happen again).
 
 
 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams  
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   
 In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. 
You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and 
being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes 
tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has 
posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to 
do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either 
apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments 
about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has 
no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think.
 
 
 On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
 
 
 Richard trolled and lied:
 
 << You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate 
people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, 
ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else 
here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up.
 
 Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. >>
 
 On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) 
takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
 
 
 Richard trolled:
 
 << It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. 
Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj 
to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he 
is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she 
is. 
 
 Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she 
owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal 
affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, 
which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In 
all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do 
with her - not one. That's what I think. >>
 
 On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been 
dozens. So I'm really curious.  Especially since you had not been involved in 
the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and 
will have wonderful holidays.
 
 
 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, "anartaxius@..." mailto:anartaxius@... 
 mailto:anartaxius@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The 
remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[awoelflebater]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 My objections to the negative comments of MJ have nothing to do with the fact 
that he was born in North Carolina, or that Judy lives in New Jersey, or that 
you live up in Canada. This is just misdirection on your part. I do not feel 
bad about where I live - it's just that it is not fair to slander people in a 
fair debate. It is considered to be very bad form, that's all, and you should 
in future refrain from this kind of reference at my expense. That's all I'm 
saying - it's not fair.
 
 This is supposed to be a spiritual forum, not a place to make fun of people 
based on their birth circumstances. 
 
 In fact, there are numerous races of people that live in and call Texas home: 
Caucasians, African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. When you group 
people together for the purpose of denigration, it is wrong. 
 
 There are also many people of German, French, and other cultures - that why 
they call it "Six Flags over Texas". In addition, there are many Cajuns and 
Creoles that live here as well. Not everyone wears 10 gallon hats and go to 
square dances.
 
 There have been six flags over Texas: Spain (1519-1685; 1690-1821), France 
(1685-1690), Mexico (1821-1836), the Republic of Texas (1836-1845), the 
Confederate States of America (1861-1865), and the United States (1845-1861; 
1865-present). 
 
 There are no Hardee's establishments in Texas, so far as I can tell. 
 

 Hee, hee. Richard you are one card. You are not even one eentsy beentsy bit 
bent out of shape about me or anyone else making jokes about Texas. And if you 
are (or if you are, indeed, suffering over it as Share asserts) then you are 
officially humour handicapped and take yourself faaa too seriously. You do 
make me laugh though, you really do and I thank you for that. Your game is so 
transparent and your need to dominate this place indicative of something new 
and strange goin' on for you but it could get old. In fact it is just about to 
cross the threshold of tiresome farce and one can only take so much of that. I 
think I glimpsed something from Stevie about you being the poster of the year 
or something as I was scrolling down just now. That looks like another good 
chuckle about to happen so excuse me while I go find that. When are you going 
to start distributing membership cards to the Farcical Follies Club that you 
are evidently the President of BTW?
 
 http://www.hardees.com/locations http://www.hardees.com/locations
 
 On 12/16/2013 9:12 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
   
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
 In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate conservatives. 
You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and you are fibbing and 
being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice is pernicious and sometimes 
tends to affect others. Ann is a case in point: on numerous occasions she has 
posted racist comments based on my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to 
do that and it is wrong for you to support such. You should both either 
apologize or leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments 
about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy and has 
no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think.
 
 
 You are a hypocrite Ricky. You have bothered and jibbed at MJ, you are 
constantly criticizing and annoying virtually everyone here with you 
never-ending little boy juvenile verbal pokings about things you know are not 
true. You are insulting and purposefully misleading and twisting facts. Just 
like the one about being "racist". First, dear boy, Texas is not filled with 
people of a different "race", it is filled with Texans and I like to bug you 
about being from Texas because it is one of those places where it is really 
easy to make stereotypical comments - just like New York and Newfoundland and a 
hundred other places including Fairfield Iowa, home of the original "roo". So 
don't start crying about "racist" comments without being in danger of being 
laughed at - heartily. But because your fragile self seems to require an 
apology here it is: 
 
 
 Dear Ricky, I am very sorry if I inadvertently, or in some way which is 
damaging to your mind or psyche, said something about you being from Texas that 
has made you depressed or feel badly about yourself. I admit that it is my own 
inability to appreciate those who wear 10 gallon hats to the local square dance 
where guns are not required to be checked at the door and and whose idea of 
fine dining is to visit their local strip mall to eat at Hardees.
 
 
 There, I hope this has made it up to you and I will attempt to watch my racist 
(although I think it is more accurate to say cultural) prejudices in the 
future. But just be aware that you, too, should watch the ranting and raving 
and trolling. At least you've left MJ alone, finall

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Richard Enigma

[Share Long]

Steve, thank you. Richard's always seemed the same to me so I'm not sure what 
effect I might have had. Anyway, I hope you and your family have a wonderful 
holiday and a happy, healthy 2014. It always makes me smile to see your name on 
a new post.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 7:46 PM, "steve.sun...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Yes, more like that.  Although, in Richard's case, it's been a long time since 
I've enjoyed his posts.  

And I think it has something to do with Share.    

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Rahsaan Roland Kirk

[image: Inline image 1]

We Free Kings - 1961
http://youtu.be/Mk0mSclnUQQ

Roland Kirk - Tenor Saxophone, Manzello, Flute, Stritch
Hank Jones - Piano
Wendell Marshall - Bass
Charlie Persip - Drums

Rahsaan Roland Kirk was a blind American jazz improvisation,
multi-instrumentalist who played tenor saxophone, flute, stritch, and many
other instruments, sometimes all at the same time. His music was intricate,
powerful jazz with a strong feel for the blues. At a live performance at
Ronnie Scott's club in London he even managed to play two instruments AFTER
he had a stroke which paralyzed his left side. Virtuoso guitarist Jimi
Hendrix "idolized" Kirk, and even hoped to collaborate with him one day.
Another great album by Kirk: Rip, Rig & Panic.

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahsaan_Roland_Kirk

'Bright Moments. The Life and Legacy of Rahsaan Roland Kirk'
by John: Kruth
Welcome Rain Publishers, New York 2000


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

> Pancho Sanchez
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Besame Mamá  - from the album Conga Blue 1995
> http://youtu.be/RY09gprbU20
>
> Poncho Sanchez, one of the top American percussionists of our time, is a
> Mexican-American conguero (conga player), Latin jazz band leader, and salsa
> singer. Sanchez and his ensemble won the Grammy Award for Best Latin Jazz
> Album. He has played with Mongo Santamaria, Hugh Masekela and Cal Tjader.
> The youngest of eleven children, Poncho Sanchez was born in Laredo, Texas.
>
> Read more:
>
> List of the Top 500 Drummers:
> http://www.drummerworld.com/drummers/Poncho_Sanchez.html
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
>
>> Cal Tjader
>>
>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>
>> Several Shades of Jade - The Fakir 1963
>> http://youtu.be/8AU_91XRstM
>>
>> Produced by Lalo Shifren
>>
>> Cal Tjader - vibes
>> Jimmy Raney - guitar
>> Dick Hyman - organ
>> Lonnie Hewitt - piano
>> Bob Bushnell - fretless electric bass
>> Johnny Rae - drums.
>>
>> Cal Tjader grew up in the San Francisco Bay area where he often played
>> with Paul Desmond and Dave Brubeck. Later in New York City, he played with
>> Mongo Santamaría, Willie Bobo, and Gábor Szabó. Tjader played the
>> vibraphone and is known primarily as a Latin/Jazz performer. One of his
>> most famous albums is called El Ritmo Cliente on Fantasy (red vinyl). He
>> was also accomplished on the drums, bongos, congas, timpani, and the piano.
>> He won a Grammy in 1980.
>>
>> I used to have this album on vinyl, Several Shades of Jade, on Verve,
>> which I bought new in 1963, but it is now missing from my collection (Jack
>> are you reading this). So, I bought the CD which has two albums on it:
>> Several Shades of Jade and Breeze From the East. Tjader discovered and
>> groomed Poncho Sanchez, another latin jazz favorite of mine. A lot of
>> people don't like fusion jazz, but I do. Go figure.
>>
>> Read more:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cal_Tjader
>>
>> 'Latin Jazz: The First of the Fusions'
>> by John Storm Roberts
>> Schirmer Books, 1999
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thelonious Monk
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> Monk's Dream 1963
>>> http://youtu.be/FxailNkhpXs
>>>
>>> Thelonious Monk - piano
>>> Charlie Rouse - tenor sax
>>> John Ore - bass
>>> Frankie Dunlop - drums
>>>
>>> According to Kelley, Thelonious Monk was born December 28, 1917, in
>>> Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Monk is considered one of the giants of
>>> American music. Monk's Dream is the first album Monk released on Columbia
>>> Records. I still have my original vinyl copy on Columbia Records and the
>>> new CD (CK 40786). The song “Bye-Ya” clocks in at 6:03. The 2002
>>> re-mastered edition on the Columbia/Legacy imprint (CK 63536) contains a
>>> version which runs only 5.25.
>>>
>>> Read more:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk
>>>
>>> 'Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original'
>>> by Robin D. Kelley
>>> JR Books, 2010
>>> p, 13
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Richard Williams 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Miles Davis

 [image: Inline image 1]

 Sketches of Spain, Live
 http://youtu.be/6CZFnyXwlV4

 Miles Davis is one of the most influential musicians of the 20th
 century. Sketches of Spain is an exemplary recording of Third Stream, a
 musical fusion of jazz, European classical, and world music. The album
 pairs Davis with arranger and composer Gil Evans, with whom he had
 collaborated on several other projects, on a program of compositions
 largely derived from the Spanish folk tradition.

 According to Crease, the album is a "quasi-symphonic, quasi-jazz world
 of sound." Chambers says that the album was not well received, but it went
 on to win for Davis a Grammy Award for Best Original Jazz Composition in
 1961. Ranked number 358 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 greatest albums
 of all t

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Richard Enigma

[steve.sundur]

Yes, more like that.  Although, in Richard's case, it's been a long time since 
I've enjoyed his posts.  
 

 And I think it has something to do with Share.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Pancho Sanchez

[image: Inline image 1]

Besame Mamá  - from the album Conga Blue 1995
http://youtu.be/RY09gprbU20

Poncho Sanchez, one of the top American percussionists of our time, is a
Mexican-American conguero (conga player), Latin jazz band leader, and salsa
singer. Sanchez and his ensemble won the Grammy Award for Best Latin Jazz
Album. He has played with Mongo Santamaria, Hugh Masekela and Cal Tjader.
The youngest of eleven children, Poncho Sanchez was born in Laredo, Texas.

Read more:

List of the Top 500 Drummers:
http://www.drummerworld.com/drummers/Poncho_Sanchez.html


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

> Cal Tjader
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> Several Shades of Jade - The Fakir 1963
> http://youtu.be/8AU_91XRstM
>
> Produced by Lalo Shifren
>
> Cal Tjader - vibes
> Jimmy Raney - guitar
> Dick Hyman - organ
> Lonnie Hewitt - piano
> Bob Bushnell - fretless electric bass
> Johnny Rae - drums.
>
> Cal Tjader grew up in the San Francisco Bay area where he often played
> with Paul Desmond and Dave Brubeck. Later in New York City, he played with
> Mongo Santamaría, Willie Bobo, and Gábor Szabó. Tjader played the
> vibraphone and is known primarily as a Latin/Jazz performer. One of his
> most famous albums is called El Ritmo Cliente on Fantasy (red vinyl). He
> was also accomplished on the drums, bongos, congas, timpani, and the piano.
> He won a Grammy in 1980.
>
> I used to have this album on vinyl, Several Shades of Jade, on Verve,
> which I bought new in 1963, but it is now missing from my collection (Jack
> are you reading this). So, I bought the CD which has two albums on it:
> Several Shades of Jade and Breeze From the East. Tjader discovered and
> groomed Poncho Sanchez, another latin jazz favorite of mine. A lot of
> people don't like fusion jazz, but I do. Go figure.
>
> Read more:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cal_Tjader
>
> 'Latin Jazz: The First of the Fusions'
> by John Storm Roberts
> Schirmer Books, 1999
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
>
>> Thelonious Monk
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Monk's Dream 1963
>> http://youtu.be/FxailNkhpXs
>>
>> Thelonious Monk - piano
>> Charlie Rouse - tenor sax
>> John Ore - bass
>> Frankie Dunlop - drums
>>
>> According to Kelley, Thelonious Monk was born December 28, 1917, in Rocky
>> Mount, North Carolina. Monk is considered one of the giants of American
>> music. Monk's Dream is the first album Monk released on Columbia Records. I
>> still have my original vinyl copy on Columbia Records and the new CD (CK
>> 40786). The song “Bye-Ya” clocks in at 6:03. The 2002 re-mastered edition
>> on the Columbia/Legacy imprint (CK 63536) contains a version which runs
>> only 5.25.
>>
>> Read more:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk
>>
>> 'Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original'
>> by Robin D. Kelley
>> JR Books, 2010
>> p, 13
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Richard Williams 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Miles Davis
>>>
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> Sketches of Spain, Live
>>> http://youtu.be/6CZFnyXwlV4
>>>
>>> Miles Davis is one of the most influential musicians of the 20th
>>> century. Sketches of Spain is an exemplary recording of Third Stream, a
>>> musical fusion of jazz, European classical, and world music. The album
>>> pairs Davis with arranger and composer Gil Evans, with whom he had
>>> collaborated on several other projects, on a program of compositions
>>> largely derived from the Spanish folk tradition.
>>>
>>> According to Crease, the album is a "quasi-symphonic, quasi-jazz world
>>> of sound." Chambers says that the album was not well received, but it went
>>> on to win for Davis a Grammy Award for Best Original Jazz Composition in
>>> 1961. Ranked number 358 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 greatest albums
>>> of all time."
>>>
>>> Read more:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis
>>>
>>> 'Gil Evans: Out of the Cool: His Life and Music'
>>> by Stephanie Crease
>>> Chicago Review Press, 2003
>>> p. 207
>>>
>>> 'Milestones: The Music And Times Of Miles Davis'
>>> Jack Chambers
>>> Da Capo Press, 1998
>>>  pp. 10-11
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>>>


 FYI, for a TM link to this, Brubeck's first group had Bill Smith on
 clarinet.  Bill joined the staff at the University of Washingtion when I
 went there. I played on some avant garde projects he did.  A few years
 later he showed up at TM residence course with Paul Horn that I attended.



 On 12/16/2013 11:23 AM, Richard Williams wrote:


  Dave Brubeck

  [image: Inline image 1]

  Dave Brubeck - Take Five ( Original Video)
 http://youtu.be/PHdU5sHigYQ

  "Take Five" is a jazz piece composed by Paul Desmond and performed by
 The Dave Brubeck Quartet on their 1959 album Time Out. It is the
 best-selling jazz single of all time.

  It was first played by th

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Richard Enigma

[authfriend]

Is that like Time magazine's Person of the Year, where it's the person who has 
made the most difference either positively or negatively?
 

 Just curious.


 Stevie wrote:

 Actually, I'm nominating Richard as FFL "Person of the Year" for 2013.  As the 
individual who has made the biggest difference to the FFL chat room.
 

 And going back, I'm nominating Share as "Person of the Year" for 2012, and 
Emily as FFL, POTY for 2011, and Ravi for 2010.  
 

 Bob Price should get a runner up for one of those years.
 

 And yes, I give Share credit for bringing out a much more interesting side of 
Richard.
 

 Ok, I'm nominating Edg for 2009.
 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[dhamiltony2k5]

RJ, I am interested in that too. The Domes and their fences.  Did Maharishi 
ever say anything particular about the hemispherical shape of the meditation 
domes that the meditating movement built? The fencing came later as an after 
thought as inquiry about Sthapatya Veda [SV] was put together and there was 
thinking about rectifying the domes as they had been built and were sitting. I 
notice the traditional Saraswati dome you posted a while ago sat atop a square 
base. 
 
 
 Any thoughts relative to the spiritual significance as to how the domes stack 
up hemispheric-ally in a squared off area, as spiritual places. Or was it more 
by accident of convenience that the Dome manufacturers just were chosen. 
Somebody knew the manufacturer otherwise? Or, at that time of needing 
meditation halls was the aesthetic of the Dome just a cultural out-shoot of our 
TM contact with Buckminister Fuller? Anybody around now who was there when the 
initial discussions were being had [1979?] and then after wards when the SV 
rectification discussions [around year 2000] were being had? Is the initial 
hemispheric shape significant as in particularly spiritually desirable? And 
then the problem of Sthapatya Veda solved with a fenced square enclosure around 
the circle foot print of the Domes. What was the historical story there? 
 
 
 I'm interested to know the sequence of how it all went for the several 
movement meditation Domes and what the thinking was as to the architectural 
bridging of inner and outer shape and form as to our transcendental expression 
that outer is an expression of inner and not just some reductionism.  
 

 The Domes are particularly great places to meditate in now for the spiritual 
field effect they do hold as Spiritual places for all the meditation that has 
been done in them. That spirituality as inner experience and inner meditation 
itself seems a long ways out from the materialism of design structures as 
super-mentality of just building designs where form may have had nothing to do 
with function as a meditation hall in our case other than a coincidence. 
Anybody here who was there in 1979 when the Golden Domes were being ordered who 
could shed light? 
 
 
 Wiki:
 The Golden Domes, also called the Maharishi Golden Domes, are twin buildings 
on the Maharishi University of Management(MUM) campus in Fairfield, Iowa built 
in 1980 and 1981. According to MUM, the Golden Domes were the first structures 
built specifically for group meditation and the practice of the TM-Sidhi 
program. In 2001 and 2005 they received additional construction including 
landscaping, perimeter fencing and new entrances. 
 
 
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes 
 
 
 
 -Buck inside the Dome

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Cal Tjader

[image: Inline image 2]

Several Shades of Jade - The Fakir 1963
http://youtu.be/8AU_91XRstM

Produced by Lalo Shifren

Cal Tjader - vibes
Jimmy Raney - guitar
Dick Hyman - organ
Lonnie Hewitt - piano
Bob Bushnell - fretless electric bass
Johnny Rae - drums.

Cal Tjader grew up in the San Francisco Bay area where he often played with
Paul Desmond and Dave Brubeck. Later in New York City, he played with Mongo
Santamaría, Willie Bobo, and Gábor Szabó. Tjader played the vibraphone and
is known primarily as a Latin/Jazz performer. One of his most famous albums
is called El Ritmo Cliente on Fantasy (red vinyl). He was also accomplished
on the drums, bongos, congas, timpani, and the piano. He won a Grammy in
1980.

I used to have this album on vinyl, Several Shades of Jade, on Verve, which
I bought new in 1963, but it is now missing from my collection (Jack are
you reading this). So, I bought the CD which has two albums on it: Several
Shades of Jade and Breeze From the East. Tjader discovered and groomed
Poncho Sanchez, another latin jazz favorite of mine. A lot of people don't
like fusion jazz, but I do. Go figure.

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cal_Tjader

'Latin Jazz: The First of the Fusions'
by John Storm Roberts
Schirmer Books, 1999


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

> Thelonious Monk
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Monk's Dream 1963
> http://youtu.be/FxailNkhpXs
>
> Thelonious Monk - piano
> Charlie Rouse - tenor sax
> John Ore - bass
> Frankie Dunlop - drums
>
> According to Kelley, Thelonious Monk was born December 28, 1917, in Rocky
> Mount, North Carolina. Monk is considered one of the giants of American
> music. Monk's Dream is the first album Monk released on Columbia Records. I
> still have my original vinyl copy on Columbia Records and the new CD (CK
> 40786). The song “Bye-Ya” clocks in at 6:03. The 2002 re-mastered edition
> on the Columbia/Legacy imprint (CK 63536) contains a version which runs
> only 5.25.
>
> Read more:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk
>
> 'Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original'
> by Robin D. Kelley
> JR Books, 2010
> p, 13
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
>
>> Miles Davis
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Sketches of Spain, Live
>> http://youtu.be/6CZFnyXwlV4
>>
>> Miles Davis is one of the most influential musicians of the 20th century.
>> Sketches of Spain is an exemplary recording of Third Stream, a musical
>> fusion of jazz, European classical, and world music. The album pairs Davis
>> with arranger and composer Gil Evans, with whom he had collaborated on
>> several other projects, on a program of compositions largely derived from
>> the Spanish folk tradition.
>>
>> According to Crease, the album is a "quasi-symphonic, quasi-jazz world of
>> sound." Chambers says that the album was not well received, but it went on
>> to win for Davis a Grammy Award for Best Original Jazz Composition in 1961.
>> Ranked number 358 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 greatest albums of
>> all time."
>>
>> Read more:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis
>>
>> 'Gil Evans: Out of the Cool: His Life and Music'
>> by Stephanie Crease
>> Chicago Review Press, 2003
>> p. 207
>>
>> 'Milestones: The Music And Times Of Miles Davis'
>> Jack Chambers
>> Da Capo Press, 1998
>>  pp. 10-11
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Bhairitu  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI, for a TM link to this, Brubeck's first group had Bill Smith on
>>> clarinet.  Bill joined the staff at the University of Washingtion when I
>>> went there. I played on some avant garde projects he did.  A few years
>>> later he showed up at TM residence course with Paul Horn that I attended.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/16/2013 11:23 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Dave Brubeck
>>>
>>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>>  Dave Brubeck - Take Five ( Original Video)
>>> http://youtu.be/PHdU5sHigYQ
>>>
>>>  "Take Five" is a jazz piece composed by Paul Desmond and performed by
>>> The Dave Brubeck Quartet on their 1959 album Time Out. It is the
>>> best-selling jazz single of all time.
>>>
>>>  It was first played by the Quartet to a live audience at the Village
>>> Gate nightclub in New York City in 1959. On the album Time Out, Brubeck
>>> used a different time signature for each track, which was very unusual.
>>> "Take Five" written in a 5/4 meter and it was one of the first Jazz songs
>>> with a time signature other than the standard 4/4 beat or 3/4 waltz time.
>>> It ended up being one of the extremely rare Jazz compositions to become a
>>> pop hit.
>>>
>>>  Dave Brubeck – piano
>>> Paul Desmond – alto saxophone
>>> Eugene Wright – bass
>>> Joe Morello – drums
>>>
>>>  Read more:
>>>
>>>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_Five
>>>
>>>  'Essential Jazz: The First 100 Years'
>>> by Henry Martin
>>> Thomson Wadsworth 2004
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>

[FairfieldLife] RE: You ain't seen nothing like this!

[authfriend]

Isn't that amazing? I saw it a little earlier.
 
BillyG wrote:

 
http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/nature/post/lion-sent-flying-by-buffalo-in-extraordinary-video/
 
http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/nature/post/lion-sent-flying-by-buffalo-in-extraordinary-video/

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Richard Enigma

[steve.sundur]

Actually, I'm nominating Richard as FFL "Person of the Year" for 2013.  As the 
individual who has made the biggest difference to the FFL chat room.
 

 And going back, I'm nominating Share as "Person of the Year" for 2012, and 
Emily as FFL, POTY for 2011, and Ravi for 2010.  
 

 Bob Price should get a runner up for one of those years.
 

 And yes, I give Share credit for bringing out a much more interesting side of 
Richard.
 

 Ok, I'm nominating Edg for 2009.
 

 

[FairfieldLife] You ain't seen nothing like this!

[wgm4u]

http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/nature/post/lion-sent-flying-by-buffalo-in-extraordinary-video/
 
http://www.grindtv.com/outdoor/nature/post/lion-sent-flying-by-buffalo-in-extraordinary-video/

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Richard Enigma

[steve.sundur]

Well, I actually nominating Richard as FFL "Person of the Year".  The person 
who has made the biggest difference 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[wgm4u]

Kama=Desire,  Rupa=form; i.e. the form of desire or the desire body! Usually 
referred to in the after death state where the unfulfilled desires are left in 
what the Catholics call 'purgatory'. This kama-rupa (as opposed to arupa or 
formless) is the suppository of all your worldly desires, if evil it takes on a 
hideous form and is attracted to hellish conditions, if good the outcome is 
happiness, even heaven or what the theosophists call Devachan.
  
 Noted often in Theosophy and Vedic literature.
  
 http://www.katinkahesselink.net/devachan.htm 
http://www.katinkahesselink.net/devachan.htm
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Richard, what do you mean by Kama-rupa?
 

 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:30 PM, Richard J. Williams  
wrote:
 
   
 Apparently all the TM mantras are feminine aspect mantras. There is no Shiva 
without Shakti. MMY fully supports the yantra as a golden dome, as pure vastu - 
an enclosure to realize pure consciousness; vastu is almost pure Shakti 
symbolism, and represents the universal womb. MMY is a proponent of yantra and 
Indian vastu and that's why the golden dome has an east-facing entrance with a 
nice fence around it - east is the traditional location of Kama-rupa. They 
don't call it "Mother" India for nothing.
 
 A 'yantra' can be any image, two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Yantras are 
tools for facilitating yogic enstasis, that is, a meditation that is 
transcendental. In tantric yoga, there are mental techniques and tools, such as 
mantra and yantra, asana, puja, etc., used as aids to meditation. A yantra is 
any design that symbolizes a void with the bindu at the center. Shakti is in 
fact, listed as a progenitor in the Guru Dev puja, right after Naryana.
 
 "Shaktism's focus on the Divine Feminine does not imply a rejection of 
Masculine or Neuter divinity. However, both are deemed to be inactive in the 
absence of Shakti. As set out in the first line of Adi Shankara's renowned 
Shakta hymn, Saundaryalahari (c. 800 CE)..."
 
 Read more:
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism
 
 On 12/15/2013 6:38 PM, yifuxero@... mailto:yifuxero@... wrote:
 
   Interesting, but MMY discarded this aspect of Devi worship; thus not 
following in the footsteps of Guru Dev. I've not encountered any instances of 
MMY promoting Devi worship, Sri Yantra or Sri Chakra pujas, or for that matter, 
the knowledge of Tantric symbols, or any related practices, aside silent 
repetition of the mantras.  No japa or worship of the Sri Yantra, or the 
Lalitasahasranama. .
 ...
 OTOH, Ramana Maharshi - even though regarded as a "pure Advaitin", had regular 
daily Sri Chakra pujas conducted at his Ashram.  So go figureMMY is a 
Sabateur.effectively putting an end to Devi worship in that particular 
lineage.
 ...
 
 
 ...
 
 
 
 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Missed this earlier...
 

 You're a little confused (again), Richard. I didn't write that post (nor did I 
go looking for it; I came across it by accident). I thought it was revealing 
how Barry was being tagged as an abuser back in 1995 (and by a former TMer, now 
an anti-TMer, at that--one with whom I was at constant and serious odds).
 

 Which pretty much demolishes the notion Barry tries to promote that I've been 
"carrying a grudge." He was an abuser then, and he's an abuser now. It's not 
carrying a grudge to have a negative opinion of someone who's been abusing you 
for 18 years.
 

 You know what else is funny? I responded to that anti-Barry post by defending 
him. Stockholm syndrome? Nope. Some of the things his critic said were unfair, 
and I'm big on fairness as well as honesty.
 
Richard trolls and lies:

 << It looks Barry was right about one thing- this gal will hold a grudge for 
decades and then go back and bring it up again and again. Judy is just like a 
broken record, repeating herself over and over. It's childish in my opinion. >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 2:33 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Say, Barry, remember this from alt.m.t from 1995? I followed a link in
 one of Richard's old posts here just out of curiosity, and stumbled
 across this as well. Want to guess who it was from?
 
 
 And my objection to shoki [Barry's handle at the time] is that he's
 drifted from one abusive cult to another throughout his adult life without
 a clue: first TM, then little Freddie Lenz/Rama, who knows what else -- 
 all the while practicing the verbal abuse he learned within them on
 former cult members, critics, journalists, anyone with whom he disagrees.
 

 Ari is clearly courageous enough to share extremely personal details of
 her life with the public at large -- in the apparent hope that people can
 draw their own conclusions from it. Ari, I admire your consistent courage
 and insight.
 

 Barry Wright (shoki) is apparently cowardly enough to abuse her
 vulnerability. Barry, I cordially despise your verbal violence. (BTW,
 Wright's public posts are only a fraction of his output. Many of us, in
 comparing notes, receive abusive personal email from him as well.)
 

 For those reading who wonder what it's like to be inside a cult, I can say
 from personal experience that it's very much like a conversation with
 Barry Wright: abusive, condenscending, elitist, without respect for
 personal boundaries or feelings. The only real difference is that, in the
 depths of a cult, this invasive abuse goes on day after day, 24 hours a
 day.
 

 Fortunately, now being free, we ex-cult members can now choose not to read
 Wright's vile posts.
 

 Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...
 
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[emilymaenot]

Share, fyi, "Fear is the highest fence." - Dudley Nichols
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Richard, do you know what the significance of a fence is?
 
 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:30 PM, Richard J. Williams  
wrote:
 
   
 Apparently all the TM mantras are feminine aspect mantras. There is no Shiva 
without Shakti. MMY fully supports the yantra as a golden dome, as pure vastu - 
an enclosure to realize pure consciousness; vastu is almost pure Shakti 
symbolism, and represents the universal womb. MMY is a proponent of yantra and 
Indian vastu and that's why the golden dome has an east-facing entrance with a 
nice fence around it - east is the traditional location of Kama-rupa. They 
don't call it "Mother" India for nothing.
 
 A 'yantra' can be any image, two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Yantras are 
tools for facilitating yogic enstasis, that is, a meditation that is 
transcendental. In tantric yoga, there are mental techniques and tools, such as 
mantra and yantra, asana, puja, etc., used as aids to meditation. A yantra is 
any design that symbolizes a void with the bindu at the center. Shakti is in 
fact, listed as a progenitor in the Guru Dev puja, right after Naryana.
 
 "Shaktism's focus on the Divine Feminine does not imply a rejection of 
Masculine or Neuter divinity. However, both are deemed to be inactive in the 
absence of Shakti. As set out in the first line of Adi Shankara's renowned 
Shakta hymn, Saundaryalahari (c. 800 CE)..."
 
 Read more:
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism
 
 On 12/15/2013 6:38 PM, yifuxero@... mailto:yifuxero@... wrote:
 
   Interesting, but MMY discarded this aspect of Devi worship; thus not 
following in the footsteps of Guru Dev. I've not encountered any instances of 
MMY promoting Devi worship, Sri Yantra or Sri Chakra pujas, or for that matter, 
the knowledge of Tantric symbols, or any related practices, aside silent 
repetition of the mantras.  No japa or worship of the Sri Yantra, or the 
Lalitasahasranama. .
 ...
 OTOH, Ramana Maharshi - even though regarded as a "pure Advaitin", had regular 
daily Sri Chakra pujas conducted at his Ashram.  So go figureMMY is a 
Sabateur.effectively putting an end to Devi worship in that particular 
lineage.
 ...
 
 
 ...
 
 
 
 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Tue 17-Dec-13 00:15:02 UTC

[FFL PostCount]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 12/14/13 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 12/21/13 00:00:00
404 messages as of (UTC) 12/17/13 00:07:51

 78 authfriend
 78 Richard J. Williams 
 36 Share Long 
 26 dhamiltony2k5
 25 emilymaenot
 22 awoelflebater
 21 TurquoiseB 
 20 doctordumbass
 20 Bhairitu 
 15 Richard Williams 
 14 s3raphita
  8 feste37 
  7 wleed3 
  5 emptybill
  5 anartaxius
  4 cardemaister
  4 Mike Dixon 
  3 jr_esq
  3 Rick Archer 
  2 yifuxero
  2 bobpriced
  1 sharelong60
  1 merudanda 
  1 martin.quickman
  1 j_alexander_stanley
  1 William Leed 
  1 Jason 
Posters: 27
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Thelonious Monk

[image: Inline image 1]

Monk's Dream 1963
http://youtu.be/FxailNkhpXs

Thelonious Monk - piano
Charlie Rouse - tenor sax
John Ore - bass
Frankie Dunlop - drums

According to Kelley, Thelonious Monk was born December 28, 1917, in Rocky
Mount, North Carolina. Monk is considered one of the giants of American
music. Monk's Dream is the first album Monk released on Columbia Records. I
still have my original vinyl copy on Columbia Records and the new CD (CK
40786). The song “Bye-Ya” clocks in at 6:03. The 2002 re-mastered edition
on the Columbia/Legacy imprint (CK 63536) contains a version which runs
only 5.25.

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelonious_Monk

'Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original'
by Robin D. Kelley
JR Books, 2010
p, 13


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

> Miles Davis
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Sketches of Spain, Live
> http://youtu.be/6CZFnyXwlV4
>
> Miles Davis is one of the most influential musicians of the 20th century.
> Sketches of Spain is an exemplary recording of Third Stream, a musical
> fusion of jazz, European classical, and world music. The album pairs Davis
> with arranger and composer Gil Evans, with whom he had collaborated on
> several other projects, on a program of compositions largely derived from
> the Spanish folk tradition.
>
> According to Crease, the album is a "quasi-symphonic, quasi-jazz world of
> sound." Chambers says that the album was not well received, but it went on
> to win for Davis a Grammy Award for Best Original Jazz Composition in 1961.
> Ranked number 358 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 greatest albums of
> all time."
>
> Read more:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis
>
> 'Gil Evans: Out of the Cool: His Life and Music'
> by Stephanie Crease
> Chicago Review Press, 2003
> p. 207
>
> 'Milestones: The Music And Times Of Miles Davis'
> Jack Chambers
> Da Capo Press, 1998
> pp. 10-11
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Bhairitu  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> FYI, for a TM link to this, Brubeck's first group had Bill Smith on
>> clarinet.  Bill joined the staff at the University of Washingtion when I
>> went there. I played on some avant garde projects he did.  A few years
>> later he showed up at TM residence course with Paul Horn that I attended.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/2013 11:23 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Dave Brubeck
>>
>>  [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>>  Dave Brubeck - Take Five ( Original Video)
>> http://youtu.be/PHdU5sHigYQ
>>
>>  "Take Five" is a jazz piece composed by Paul Desmond and performed by
>> The Dave Brubeck Quartet on their 1959 album Time Out. It is the
>> best-selling jazz single of all time.
>>
>>  It was first played by the Quartet to a live audience at the Village
>> Gate nightclub in New York City in 1959. On the album Time Out, Brubeck
>> used a different time signature for each track, which was very unusual.
>> "Take Five" written in a 5/4 meter and it was one of the first Jazz songs
>> with a time signature other than the standard 4/4 beat or 3/4 waltz time.
>> It ended up being one of the extremely rare Jazz compositions to become a
>> pop hit.
>>
>>  Dave Brubeck – piano
>> Paul Desmond – alto saxophone
>> Eugene Wright – bass
>> Joe Morello – drums
>>
>>  Read more:
>>
>>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_Five
>>
>>  'Essential Jazz: The First 100 Years'
>> by Henry Martin
>> Thomson Wadsworth 2004
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Miles Davis

[image: Inline image 1]

Sketches of Spain, Live
http://youtu.be/6CZFnyXwlV4

Miles Davis is one of the most influential musicians of the 20th century.
Sketches of Spain is an exemplary recording of Third Stream, a musical
fusion of jazz, European classical, and world music. The album pairs Davis
with arranger and composer Gil Evans, with whom he had collaborated on
several other projects, on a program of compositions largely derived from
the Spanish folk tradition.

According to Crease, the album is a "quasi-symphonic, quasi-jazz world of
sound." Chambers says that the album was not well received, but it went on
to win for Davis a Grammy Award for Best Original Jazz Composition in 1961.
Ranked number 358 on Rolling Stone's list of the "500 greatest albums of
all time."

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Davis

'Gil Evans: Out of the Cool: His Life and Music'
by Stephanie Crease
Chicago Review Press, 2003
p. 207

'Milestones: The Music And Times Of Miles Davis'
Jack Chambers
Da Capo Press, 1998
pp. 10-11


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Bhairitu  wrote:

>
>
> FYI, for a TM link to this, Brubeck's first group had Bill Smith on
> clarinet.  Bill joined the staff at the University of Washingtion when I
> went there. I played on some avant garde projects he did.  A few years
> later he showed up at TM residence course with Paul Horn that I attended.
>
>
>
> On 12/16/2013 11:23 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
>
>
>  Dave Brubeck
>
>  [image: Inline image 1]
>
>  Dave Brubeck - Take Five ( Original Video)
> http://youtu.be/PHdU5sHigYQ
>
>  "Take Five" is a jazz piece composed by Paul Desmond and performed by
> The Dave Brubeck Quartet on their 1959 album Time Out. It is the
> best-selling jazz single of all time.
>
>  It was first played by the Quartet to a live audience at the Village
> Gate nightclub in New York City in 1959. On the album Time Out, Brubeck
> used a different time signature for each track, which was very unusual.
> "Take Five" written in a 5/4 meter and it was one of the first Jazz songs
> with a time signature other than the standard 4/4 beat or 3/4 waltz time.
> It ended up being one of the extremely rare Jazz compositions to become a
> pop hit.
>
>  Dave Brubeck – piano
> Paul Desmond – alto saxophone
> Eugene Wright – bass
> Joe Morello – drums
>
>  Read more:
>
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_Five
>
>  'Essential Jazz: The First 100 Years'
> by Henry Martin
> Thomson Wadsworth 2004
>
>
>  
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] MMY's Shakti

[Bhairitu]

How do you resolve that the Shankaracharya Tradition is Shaivite and the 
TM teaching is Shakta (goddess)?


On 12/15/2013 04:11 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
This short study is the report of a Westerner who has practiced yoga 
under a teachers from India and Tibet and Japan. The primary purpose 
of my investigation was to test by personal experience the techniques 
of Tantra Yoga. So, after getting an initiation with the requisite 
mantra and instruction on their use, I went to various yoga camps with 
the aim of testing the techniques and to follow a course of 
traditional training, taking notes and making critical observations in 
order to appraise the results in the light of my own personal discovery.


I was one of the first in the U.S. to  be initiated into Tantra Yoga. 
In order to further my studies, I have delved deeply into the subject 
of meditation that is transcendental for over forty years, I still 
find nothing to match the work done by MMY. In my continued research I 
have found that almost all the writings fail to mention where the TM 
mantras came from.


In fact, according to my research, all the MMY mantras come from the 
Sri Vidya tradition which is in turn based on the "Shat Chakra 
Nirupana," which elaborates on the seven chakras corresponding to the 
seven states of consciousness in the subtle body. You will find 
illustrations of the chakras along with the vertical axis of the spine 
and the various petals that emanate from each chakra, and the diagram 
of the Sri Yantra mandala.


Inline image 1

There are numerous commentaries explaining the esoteric meaning of the 
Sri Yantra and the mode of worship, such as the commentary by 
Lakshmidhara on Sound Arya Lahari and on the Ananda Lahari, both 
composed by the Adi Shankara. There is a chapter in the Tripura 
Upanishad and one in the Bhavano Upanishad and the  importance of the 
importance given to the worship of Sri Yantra.


Worship of the Sri Yantra is as interesting as it is complex: it is 
ritualistic, abstract and esoteric, and yet the Sri Yantra is one of 
the most meaningful and useful symbols that has been handed down to us 
from the Adi Shankaracharya: The essence of the vibration is the 
ecstatic self-recurrent consciousness. Impelled by universal welfare, 
the Adi Shankara gave great importance to Sakti worship. And to this 
end, the Adi Shankara installed a Sri Yantra in at places of Sakti 
worship.


The very quintessence of the Sri Vidya is a chapter which deals with 
the fundamentals of the ancient mystic syllables that constitute Devi 
worship and the relevance of simple worship of Sri Saraswati - Lalita 
 - Tripurasundari and the place where the Sri Yantra is installed. 
There is also the life story of Bhaskararaya which shows how effective 
are the mystic diagram and the mantras used in the meditation on Devi 
Shakti.


The most complex yantra, like the Oregon yantra, is the Shri Yantra of 
the tantric school of Sri Vidya. Khanna says that the structure of 
this yantra is described in the Shankara's Saundaryalahari (Wave of 
Beauty). "Mantras, the Sanskrit syllables inscribed on yantras, are 
essentially 'thought forms' representing divinities or cosmic powers, 
which exert their influence by means of sound-vibrations."


Works cited:

Sri Saraswati : The Goddess of Knowledge (Sakti Darsan 6)
by T.R. Ramachandran
Tattvaloka Publication, Sri Sharada Peetham, Sringeri
p. 112

'Yantra: The Tantric Symbol of Cosmic Unity'
by Madhu Khanna
Inner Traditions, 2003
p. 21

Other titles of interest:

'Meditation Revolution: A History and Theology of the Siddha Yoga Lineage'
by Paul E. Muller-Ortega and Douglas Brooks
Agama Press, 1997

'The Doctrine of Vibration: An Analysis of the Doctrines and Practices 
of Kashmir Shaivism'

by Mark S.G. Dyczkowski
Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 1987

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Posting a photo of your face would probably be a good idea. You might actually 
look less like a horse's ass in a photo than you do in your written posts.
 

 Richared feebled:

 << This thread is a new phase for me - I'm actually having a dialog with Judy, 
if anyone could call it that. It's really more like a dump though, instead of a 
debate. There really no point in debating with an ankle-biter. About all anyone 
can do with a mean little dog is just to make a face. Maybe I'll post a photo 
of my face showing a grimace. >>

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Allow me to repeat (apparently you didn't read this part of my post):
 

 Barry called you "willytex" as late as mid-November (referring to you as an 
"attention troll," BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has called you 
willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to yourself as willytex in 
October 2012.

 

 So I guess that makes you a hypocrite as well as a person with double 
standards.


 

 Richard trolled and lied:

 << You dumb shit - "willytex" is my email address. I told you on numerous 
occasions my name was Richard, and yet you persisted in calling me "willytex" 
just so you could demean me. You made it look like you didn't like people from 
Texas. That was an insult. I told you not to do that but you would not listen 
to me when I complained. That was a low-down and childish trick just so you 
could get people to think that I was not a person. If I objected to being 
called "willytex" -  you should have stopped, but you did not. That was wrong 
of you. 
 
 This is not about Barry. 
 
 And, I posted in one of my very first posts back in 1999 that I was living in 
Texas. And, I never said I was of Hispanic heritage - in fact, I'm part Native 
American, adopted by the Williams family. You should apologize to the entire 
group or leave. That's what I think.  >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 2:06 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   More Richard bullshit. You used "willytex" as your handle for a long time. 
Then you used a lot of other silly handles (in many cases concurrently) based 
on the word "pundit" (which you've used here as well). Those obviously didn't 
fit you. Once you've used a handle that sticks, you need to resign yourself to 
people using it. In any event, you appeared to object to "willytex" just for 
the sake of having something to object to in my posts.
 
 
 Barry called you "willytex" as late as mid-November (referring to you as an 
"attention troll," BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has called you 
willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to yourself as willytex in 
October 2012.
 
 
 Nope, sorry, not a valid complaint.
 
 
 (And FWIW, it didn't occur to me back then that it had anything to do with 
"Texas." Didn't register with me that you were from Texas for a long time.)
 
 
 Oh, plus which, you've posted your photo here and are possibly the least 
Hispanic-looking person I've ever seen, so you can't use that to cry racism 
either. Not to mention that your last name is "Williams."
 
 
 Nope nope nope, just more trolling. As I pointed out to Barry, it's getting 
dumber and dumber.
 
 
 Richard trolled:
 
 << For the record, Judy called me "willytex" for years after I told her my 
name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. And, for the 
record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the general population. And, 
also for the record, Judy did not post an objection when Ann posted numerous 
messages denigrating people that live in Texas. Where I come from, silence 
usually indicates agreement. We do not take kindly to racial profiling. It was 
wrong of Judy and Ann to do this in a fair debate. That's what I think. >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Share pandered:
 
 
 << Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think 
of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. >>
 
 
 
 
 How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly to call 
prejudice against Texans "racism"? (And while you're at it, you might want to 
see if you can remember anything I've ever said against Texans. Could Richard 
have been lying about that, do you think?) And here's a tip: he isn't 
suffering. He loves it when he can stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he 
genuinely doesn't care what folks think about him.
 
 
 << I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style 
and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and 
some people won't. >>
 
 
 
 As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about 
Richard, even when he's lied about others.
 
 
 << You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I 
hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 
great rock stars, etc. >>
 
 
 FWIW, I have no objection to his "knowledge posts" or the "100 great" posts. 
The "What I did today"-type posts are fine if what he did today was something 
interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your responses to them, IMHO). 
Those types of posts from him are actually trolls; he's aiming to get people to 
complain about how boring they are so he can make a big fuss about the 
complaints.
 
 
 << You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: >>
 
 
 Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually 
counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end up looking 
insincere, and that doesn't do hi

Re: [FairfieldLife] I Col Leed am a peace activist PROUDLY & HUMBLE in silence as well as activity

[wleed3]

YES I am such as well as always having a copy or copies of said tome to share 
with interested ones & or of like mind.


In a message dated 12/16/13 16:52:51 Eastern Standard Time, 
dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes:



Is Buck the only peace-activist on FFL? 
Has anyone else here read the absolute theory of Peace?
Had no experience with it?
-Buck in the Dome  




(French: procédure d'approbation tacite; Latin: qui tacet consentire videtur, 
"he who is silent is taken to agree", "silence implies/means consent") 


A textbook on diplomacy describes the silence procedure thus:
... a proposal with strong support is deemed to have been agreed unless any 
member raises an objection to it before a precise deadline: silence signifies 
assent – or, at least,acquiescence. This procedure relies on a member in a 
minority fearing that raising an objection will expose it to the charge of 
obstructiveness and, thereby, the perils of isolation. Silence procedure is 
employed by NATO, the OSCE, in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security 
Policy of the European Union (EU) and, no doubt, in numerous other 
international bodies.[3]
..and otherwise implies, chickenshits?



All we are saying is “give peace a chance”. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxS8gQ-xHgE 



Like hey, are there no other real peace-activists besides Buck on this FFL 
forum here? Not even a shout-out here on this? Or, is this silence here on a 
serious heart-felt subject like this one as in places where silence means 
agreement, as in “I'm with you”.
Thank You in Love, 
-Buck in the Dome  




Friends; Check your old internal software with its bits and old fragmented 
love, tough broken bits of love fragmented in it. Time now for a defrag of the 
old testaments. A new download of love is available, an update of love, as a 
newer testament borne even of modern science in our experience. A lot more 
meditation is being called for as mediation in the world now. We know so much 
more. A new download is happening even now. The new download is freely 
available like receiving a free grace. You just have to ask for it. It is time 
to come to meditation. It is timely for a new love of regeneration. All we are 
saying is, Give Peace a Chance. Take the time to make the time to join in 
groups meditating to mediate peace in the world everywhere. Science says, Come 
to Meditation. 
 -Buck, in the Dome  


Updating love, the descent of old Christmas love can't come fast enough to that 
area. Love needs to be updated fast in that whole East China Sea region right 
now. People everywhere should come to meditation now. Tonite. Tomorrow morning. 
That whole region needs a major download of love as a vector of shakti from the 
Unified Field right now. 
Sincerely, -Buck 




I am feeling Bush II was quite right in his way, we got the vibration of an 
axis of evil going there. Very un-spiritual in excitation. Not much love at 
all. This is coming a time where people now who know better should come back to 
meditation around this.
-Buck in the Dome  




“States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, 
arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass 
destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide 
these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They 
could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of 
these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.” -President 
Bush II 




North Korea announced on Thursday that it had executed Chang Song-thaek, the 
uncle of leader Kim Jong-un, for "acts of treachery".
The move has raised concerns of instability in the secretive and repressive 
nuclear-armed country.



A Platform for World Peace-making:
“One of the now disputed areas is a submerged rock on which a South Korean 
maritime research base is perched”



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-25288268



Come to a group Mediation Meditation for Peace near you. Join with the 
widespread deployment of groups in meditation near you for peace now.
-Buck in the Dome


With reference to DEFENCE, Heaven on Earth will be characterized by 'victory 
before war' -lack of the need to prepare for defense, because everything and 
everyone will be on the path of evolution, and as a result, coherence in every 
country will be so strong that invincibility will be a natural feature of 
national life -no negativity will arise, and no enemy will be born for any 
nation. 


Let's hear it for Heaven On Earth. 

I know it's difficult in our times to conceive of a world so perfect that 
negativity and violence and war cannot arise. That's why we look to the holy 
scriptures for inspiration, because they portray life as it was in more pure, 
more holy times. So go read your Bhagavad-Gita for a glimpse of such "no 
violence can arise" times. 

Ignore the part about it all taking place on a battlefield during a war, and 
the personification of

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Allow me to repeat the part of my post you apparently missed:
 (It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware 
that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.)


 
 Richard trolled and lied:
 
 << But, you said you were going to create a macro key and we all know you use 
Microsoft Word, just like Barry and I do, and have for years. You said so 
yourself. And, now we all know that it is impossible to create a macro in Yahoo 
Neo. You sound like you're in denial. Why can't you just be honest about it? 
It's not a crime to copy and paste a sentence into the Neo text box from Word 
or WorPerfect, but your denial says a lot about your art of deception - it is a 
very sneaky way to win a debate, whether it's Word or any other word processor 
you are using. >>
 On 12/16/2013 2:53 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a 
detailed refutation, let me know.
 
 
 (It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware 
that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.)
 
 
 Richard trolled and lied:
 
 << Not to mention that Judy thought she was being really clever and thought 
that nobody knew anything about setting "macro keys" in Microsoft Word. 
Obviously Judy told a couple of fibs on this one. 
 
 So, I guess we all know now that she's not all that honest, trying to put one 
over on the newbies on this forum. I guess she forgot that you and I are 
experts in using Word and and we each know it like the back of our hand. 
 
 Apparently Judy will go to just about any length in order to win a debate, 
including name-calling and on down to g outright deception. Go figure. >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
   What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program that doesn't 
support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" the macro for one post, 
and seemingly with the only "edit" being to delete a leading parentheses.
 
 The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the same 
blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's something deeply 
pathological about that. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
"Richard J. Williams" wrote:
 >
 > So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and 
 > then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in 
 > Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you 
 > didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the 
 > first place. Go figure.
 > 
 > We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, 
 > but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the 
 > reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt 
 > to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word 
 > using just a single keystroke anyway.
 > 
 > I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do 
 > something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a 
 > professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it every 
 > day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it. 
 > That's what I think.
 > 
 > On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
 > >
 > > So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said 
 > > I had created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I 
 > > know, there's no way to create one "in Neo."
 > >
 > >
 > > And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go 
 > > into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.
 > >
 > >
 > > Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.
 > >
 > >
 > > (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine 
 > > what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard 
 > > instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct 
 > > him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using the 
 > > macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and 
 > > lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running 
 > > out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans are a 
 > > different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the 
 > > macro. He's making my point for me.)
 > >
 > >
 > > Barry fails again:
 > >
 > > */<< Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little 
 > > something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make 
 > > Richard's day.
 > >
 > > As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created 
 > > a "macro" in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's 
 > > commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. >>
 > >
 > > Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-)
 > >
 > > /*--- In

[FairfieldLife] Google Blackmail

[Bhairitu]

Political satire video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ymkA1N3oFwg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

This thread is a new phase for me - I'm actually having a dialog with 
Judy, if anyone could call it that. It's really more like a dump though, 
instead of a debate. There really no point in debating with an 
ankle-biter. About all anyone can do with a mean little dog is just to 
make a face. Maybe I'll post a photo of my face showing a grimace.


Yeah, that's the ticket! Judy could probably relate to an inline image. 
Go figure.



On 12/16/2013 3:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.*


*
*

*Richard trolled and lied:*


<< It looks like Judy altered her "macro" once again. In fact, this is 
either a new message that she typed up; or it is a macro message she 
copied and pasted from Microsoft Word; or that she in fact, is fibbing 
about the whole thing. That's what I think. >>



On 12/16/2013 9:31 AM, authfriend@...  wrote:

This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.



Richard trolled and lied:


<< So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft 
Word and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a 
macro in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. 
But, you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do 
that in the first place. Go figure.


We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all 
day, but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that 
the reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish 
attempt to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a 
macro in Word using just a single keystroke anyway. >>

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: State censorship of radio

[Bhairitu]

On 12/16/2013 01:00 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:


Re "On my walks I listen to streams on my smart phone rather than AM 
or even FM radio.":


I'm illiterate as far as new technology goes. Is it that you can 
access the internet on a smart phone without having to rely on a local 
wi-fi connexion? So you use the phone company's regular signal? If so, 
doesn't that cost per minute?




I have data on my T-Mobile account which costs $30 a month total.  I 
don't talk much via the phone so most use is the data which is up to 5 
GB a month.   I start out from my house using my wifi and a house or two 
up it switches to using 4G data from T-Mobile.  I also sometimes use a 
small FM transmitter to broadcast the smartphone signal to the car radio.




Over here when they dropped the analogue signal for TV transmissions 
and we all went digital it meant my hand-held mini-TV receiver went in 
the garbage can and there was no equivalent portable digital TV to 
replace it.




Analog was dropped in 2009 in the US.  It was supposed to happen in 2006 
but the Bush administration was slow to get the free converter program 
in place so it needed to be delayed.  There was a plan for hand-held 
digital TVs with a lower resolution sub carrier but it seems to have 
gone away since everyone watches on their phones anymore.




Re"I love all the big corporations losing their asses on their radio 
and TV stations.":


Bring it on.

With me it's not so much the profits that alarm me, it's the monopoly 
on the "narrative" we get fed by the MSM.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

It's none of my business, but don't you think you should be getting some 
work done for your clients, if you still have any? Just be honest. If 
you need some money to pay the rent, I have a PayPal account and I could 
send you a few dollars. Would that help? I don't want to think I'm 
keeping you from your professional responsibilities, but I can do this 
for days, even years - I have plenty of time on my hands these days.


P.S. I'm thinking of changing my handle to "Professor Post"- what do you 
think? Is that alright with you?


On 12/16/2013 3:06 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.


Richard trolled and lied:

<< For the record, Judy said she was going to create a macro key, but 
she failed to reveal that this is impossible using Yahoo Neo. She 
attempted to deceive, and now she is in denial mode. Not to mention 
that Judy it was very unbecoming of her to do this in a fair debate. 
Everyone can see that Judy has altered her "macro"on numerous 
occasions, proving that  she in fact, did not set up a macro key, 
anywhere. It was all just a fib in order to be the winner in a debate. 
It was a very petty thing to do. It is pathological. That's what I 
think. >>


On 12/16/2013 9:27 AM, authfriend@...  wrote:

Allow me to quote the part of my post you missed (the part at the 
top, oddly enough):



So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said 
I had created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I 
know, there's no way to create one "in Neo."



And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go 
into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.



Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.


Barry tries to crawl out of the hole he dug for himself:

*/<< What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program 
that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" 
the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only "edit" being to 
delete a leading parentheses.


The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the 
same blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's 
something deeply pathological about that. >>/*

*/
/*
*There would be if that were the case, but it isn't.
*

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[Share Long]

Richard, do you know what the significance of a fence is?





On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:30 PM, Richard J. Williams 
 wrote:
 
  
Apparently all the TM mantras are feminine aspect mantras. There is no Shiva 
without Shakti. MMY fully supports the yantra as a golden dome, as pure vastu - 
an enclosure to realize pure consciousness; vastu is almost pure Shakti 
symbolism, and represents the universal womb. MMY is a proponent of yantra and 
Indian vastu and that's why the golden dome has an east-facing entrance with a 
nice fence around it - east is the traditional location of Kama-rupa. They 
don't call it "Mother" India for nothing.

A 'yantra' can be any image, two-dimensional or three-dimensional.
  Yantras are tools for facilitating yogic enstasis, that is, a
  meditation that is transcendental. In tantric yoga, there are
  mental techniques and tools, such as mantra and yantra, asana,
  puja, etc., used as aids to meditation. A yantra is any design
  that symbolizes a void with the bindu at the center. Shakti is in
  fact, listed as a progenitor in the Guru Dev puja, right after
  Naryana.

"Shaktism's focus on the Divine Feminine does not imply a
  rejection of Masculine or Neuter divinity. However, both are
  deemed to be inactive in the absence of Shakti. As set out in the
  first line of Adi Shankara's renowned Shakta hymn, Saundaryalahari
  (c. 800 CE)..."

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism

On 12/15/2013 6:38 PM, yifux...@yahoo.com wrote:

  
>Interesting, but MMY discarded this aspect of Devi worship; thus not following 
>in the footsteps of Guru Dev. I've not encountered any instances of MMY 
>promoting Devi worship, Sri Yantra or Sri Chakra pujas, or for that matter, 
>the knowledge of Tantric symbols, or any related practices, aside silent 
>repetition of the mantras.  No japa or worship of the Sri Yantra, or the 
>Lalitasahasranama. .
>...
>OTOH, Ramana Maharshi - even though regarded as a "pure Advaitin", had regular 
>daily Sri Chakra pujas conducted at his Ashram.  So go figureMMY is a 
>Sabateur.effectively putting an end to Devi worship in that particular 
>lineage.
>...
>
>
>...

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: MMY's Shakti

[Share Long]

Richard, what do you mean by Kama-rupa?





On Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:30 PM, Richard J. Williams 
 wrote:
 
  
Apparently all the TM mantras are feminine aspect mantras. There is no Shiva 
without Shakti. MMY fully supports the yantra as a golden dome, as pure vastu - 
an enclosure to realize pure consciousness; vastu is almost pure Shakti 
symbolism, and represents the universal womb. MMY is a proponent of yantra and 
Indian vastu and that's why the golden dome has an east-facing entrance with a 
nice fence around it - east is the traditional location of Kama-rupa. They 
don't call it "Mother" India for nothing.

A 'yantra' can be any image, two-dimensional or three-dimensional.
  Yantras are tools for facilitating yogic enstasis, that is, a
  meditation that is transcendental. In tantric yoga, there are
  mental techniques and tools, such as mantra and yantra, asana,
  puja, etc., used as aids to meditation. A yantra is any design
  that symbolizes a void with the bindu at the center. Shakti is in
  fact, listed as a progenitor in the Guru Dev puja, right after
  Naryana.

"Shaktism's focus on the Divine Feminine does not imply a
  rejection of Masculine or Neuter divinity. However, both are
  deemed to be inactive in the absence of Shakti. As set out in the
  first line of Adi Shankara's renowned Shakta hymn, Saundaryalahari
  (c. 800 CE)..."

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaktism

On 12/15/2013 6:38 PM, yifux...@yahoo.com wrote:

  
>Interesting, but MMY discarded this aspect of Devi worship; thus not following 
>in the footsteps of Guru Dev. I've not encountered any instances of MMY 
>promoting Devi worship, Sri Yantra or Sri Chakra pujas, or for that matter, 
>the knowledge of Tantric symbols, or any related practices, aside silent 
>repetition of the mantras.  No japa or worship of the Sri Yantra, or the 
>Lalitasahasranama. .
>...
>OTOH, Ramana Maharshi - even though regarded as a "pure Advaitin", had regular 
>daily Sri Chakra pujas conducted at his Ashram.  So go figureMMY is a 
>Sabateur.effectively putting an end to Devi worship in that particular 
>lineage.
>...
>
>
>...

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

Stop the lying, Judy, Everyone here knows I didn't make up the Fairfield 
Guidelines. Now nobody is going to take you seriously and if they do, 
they are real dumb, in my opinion. The FFL Guidelines are in the File 
section:


http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/files/FFL_Guidelines/ 



On 12/16/2013 2:56 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.*


*
*
*Richard trolled and lied:*

<< In my opinion, Judy has slandered me on numerous occasions and 
attempted to smear my name. I feel that this is race-based, because 
she hates people from Texas and all conservatives. And, she encourages 
others to agree with her.


She should desist in this kind of behavior- it is contrary to the 
rules of good internet behavior and it is unbecoming of her to do that.


 She is unable to engage in a fair debate. If Judy has any rebuttal to 
any of my messages, let her post them and specify what untruths I have 
posted with the date and time. It is my right to post my opinions here 
any time I feel like it. I should be able to do this without 
harassment and abuse from anyone. That's what I think.


Maybe its time to review the Yahoo FairfieldLife Guidelines:

3) All parties who feel aggrieved by any statements within the forum 
have free opportunities to provide a rebuttal to those statements 
within the forum. >>


http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/files/FFL_Guidelines/ 



On 12/16/2013 9:19 AM, authfriend@...  wrote:


Richard trolled and lied:


<< That's your opinion and you are entitled to post it. You are not 
entitled to post remarks that are racist and slanderous. >>


Well, I don't do that, but in fact there's no rule against it.

>> And it is unbecoming of you to attempt to solicit discussion off-line in an 
attempt to gain an advantage through hearsay and deception. >>


It would be unbecoming of me if I'd ever done that, but of course I 
haven't. You made that up.


<< The very purpose of this thread is so you have the opportunity to 
engage in a fair debate with me and the other respondents on this 
list. For some reason you refuse to engage. I can only assume that 
it's because a deep-seated prejudice that you don't to discuss. >>


No, as you know, it's because it's not possible to have a rational 
debate with you. You make sure of that.


<< We all have some prejudice - nobody is perfect - sometimes we 
don't even realize that we are prejudiced. Since you won't discuss 
it, we must assume that's why you won't debate. It's kind of sad to 
see you like this - it's a very ugly side of you, Judy. It's one 
thing to denigrate Barry and to pick on Share, and it's one thing to 
not like conservative voters, but it's wrong of you to dislike what I 
say on the basis of my birth circumstances. >>


Which, of course, I've never done. Just one more thing you've made up.

<< You should post your objections to anything I say right here in 
public so everyone can read it and we can debate it and so everyone 
can read it and decide for themselves. You are being unfair and 
defensive. We can only assume that you have some kind of hidden 
agenda that you do not want to reveal. Go figure. >>


Actually you could assume the facts, which are that I've already made 
my "agenda" quite public, which is to make sure newbies and 
occasional posters know (the old-timers and regulars know this 
already)that you are a troll and a liar and that engaging with you 
only encourages your trolling and lying. I think your recent behavior 
toward me has established that pretty firmly. It will probably be 
necessary to reestablish it at some point if we get a fresh crop of 
newbies, though (unless your behavior changes radically and you give 
up trolling, which I don't expect).

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

But, you said you were going to create a macro key and we all know you 
use Microsoft Word, just like Barry and I do, and have for years. You 
said so yourself. And, now we all know that it is impossible to create a 
macro in Yahoo Neo. You sound like you're in denial. Why can't you just 
be honest about it? It's not a crime to copy and paste a sentence into 
the Neo text box from Word or WorPerfect, but your denial says a lot 
about your art of deception - it is a very sneaky way to win a debate, 
whether it's Word or any other word processor you are using.


On 12/16/2013 2:53 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.*


*
*

*(It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to 
be aware that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.)*


*
*

*Richard trolled and lied:
*
<< Not to mention that Judy thought she was being really clever and 
thought that nobody knew anything about setting "macro keys" in 
Microsoft Word. Obviously Judy told a couple of fibs on this one.


So, I guess we all know now that she's not all that honest, trying to 
put one over on the newbies on this forum. I guess she forgot that you 
and I are experts in using Word and and we each know it like the back 
of our hand.


Apparently Judy will go to just about any length in order to win a 
debate, including name-calling and on down to g outright deception. Go 
figure. >>


On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

*/What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program 
that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" 
the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only "edit" being to 
delete a leading parentheses.


The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the 
same blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's 
something deeply pathological about that.


/*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:

>
> So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word 
and

> then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in
> Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you
> didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in 
the

> first place. Go figure.
>
> We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day,
> but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the
> reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish 
attempt
> to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in 
Word

> using just a single keystroke anyway.
>
> I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do
> something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a
> professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it 
every

> day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it.
> That's what I think.
>
> On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
> >
> > So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never 
said

> > I had created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I
> > know, there's no way to create one "in Neo."
> >
> >
> > And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go
> > into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.
> >
> >
> > Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.
> >
> >
> > (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine
> > what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard
> > instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct
> > him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm 
using the

> > macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and
> > lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running
> > out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans 
are a

> > different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the
> > macro. He's making my point for me.)
> >
> >
> > Barry fails again:
> >
> > */<< Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a 
little

> > something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make
> > Richard's day.
> >
> > As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having 
created

> > a "macro" in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's
> > commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. >>
> >
> > Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-)
> >
> > /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
, wrote:

> > >
> > > This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except
> > Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation,
> > let me know.
> >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Fw: Fwd: Reincarnation humor.

[Share Long]

 




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 








why did I get this?unsubscribe from this listupdate subscription 
preferences 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

It looks Barry was right about one thing- this gal will hold a grudge 
for decades and then go back and bring it up again and again. Judy is 
just like a broken record, repeating herself over and over. It's 
childish in my opinion.


On 12/16/2013 2:33 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Say, Barry, remember this from alt.m.t from 1995? I followed a link in

one of Richard's old posts here just out of curiosity, and stumbled

across this as well. Want to guess who it was from?


And my objection to shoki [Barry's handle at the time] is that he's

drifted from one abusive cult to another throughout his adult life without

a clue: first TM, then little Freddie Lenz/Rama, who knows what else --

all the while practicing the verbal abuse he learned within them on

former cult members, critics, journalists, anyone with whom he disagrees.

Ari is clearly courageous enough to share extremely personal details of
her life with the public at large -- in the apparent hope that people can
draw their own conclusions from it. Ari, I admire your consistent courage
and insight.

Barry Wright (shoki) is apparently cowardly enough to abuse her
vulnerability. Barry, I cordially despise your verbal violence. (BTW,
Wright's public posts are only a fraction of his output. Many of us, in
comparing notes, receive abusive personal email from him as well.)

For those reading who wonder what it's like to be inside a cult, I can say
from personal experience that it's very much like a conversation with
Barry Wright: abusive, condenscending, elitist, without respect for
personal boundaries or feelings. The only real difference is that, in the
depths of a cult, this invasive abuse goes on day after day, 24 hours a
day.

Fortunately, now being free, we ex-cult members can now choose not to read
Wright's vile posts.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

You dumb shit - "willytex" is my email address. I told you on numerous 
occasions my name was Richard, and yet you persisted in calling me 
"willytex" just so you could demean me. You made it look like you didn't 
like people from Texas. That was an insult. I told you not to do that 
but you would not listen to me when I complained. That was a low-down 
and childish trick just so you could get people to think that I was not 
a person. If I objected to being called "willytex" -  you should have 
stopped, but you did not. That was wrong of you.


This is not about Barry.

And, I posted in one of my very first posts back in 1999 that I was 
living in Texas. And, I never said I was of Hispanic heritage - in fact, 
I'm part Native American, adopted by the Williams family. You should 
apologize to the entire group or leave. That's what I think.


On 12/16/2013 2:06 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


More Richard bullshit. You used "willytex" as your handle for a long 
time. Then you used a lot of other silly handles (in many cases 
concurrently) based on the word "pundit" (which you've used here as 
well). Those obviously didn't fit you. Once you've used a handle that 
sticks, you need to resign yourself to people using it. In any event, 
you appeared to object to "willytex" just for the sake of having 
something to object to in my posts.



Barry called you "willytex" as late as mid-November (referring to you 
as an "attention troll," BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has 
called you willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to 
/yourself/ as willytex in October 2012.



Nope, sorry, not a valid complaint.


(And FWIW, it didn't occur to me back then that it had anything to do 
with "Texas." Didn't register with me that you /were/ from Texas for a 
long time.)



Oh, plus which, you've posted your photo here and are possibly the 
least Hispanic-looking person I've ever seen, so you can't use that to 
cry racism either. Not to mention that your last name is "Williams."



Nope nope nope, just more trolling. As I pointed out to Barry, it's 
getting dumber and dumber.



Richard trolled:


<< For the record, Judy called me "willytex" for years after I told 
her my name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. 
And, for the record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the 
general population. And, also for the record, Judy did not post an 
objection when Ann posted numerous messages denigrating people that 
live in Texas. Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. 
We do not take kindly to racial profiling. It was wrong of Judy and 
Ann to do this in a fair debate. That's what I think. >>


On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfriend@...  wrote:


Share pandered:


<< Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I 
could think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this 
and not suffer. >>


How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly 
to call prejudice against Texans "racism"? (And while you're at it, 
you might want to see if you can remember anything I've ever said 
against Texans. Could Richard have been lying about that, do you 
think?) And here's a tip: he isn't suffering. He loves it when he can 
stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he genuinely doesn't care what 
folks think about him.



<< I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting 
content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies 
written about you and some people won't. >>



As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied 
about Richard, even when he's lied about others.



<< You don't have much control over what people think and believe. 
Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what 
I did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. >>


FWIW, I have no objection to his "knowledge posts" or the "100 great" 
posts. The "What I did today"-type posts are fine if what he did 
today was something interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your 
responses to them, IMHO). Those types of posts from him are actually 
trolls; he's aiming to get people to complain about how boring they 
are so he can make a big fuss about the complaints.


<< You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: >>

Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually 
counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end 
up looking insincere, and that doesn't do him any good.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.
 

 Richard trolled and lied:
 

 << For the record, Judy said she was going to create a macro key, but she 
failed to reveal that this is impossible using Yahoo Neo. She attempted to 
deceive, and now she is in denial mode. Not to mention that Judy it was very 
unbecoming of her to do this in a fair debate. Everyone can see that Judy has 
altered her "macro"on numerous occasions, proving that  she in fact, did not 
set up a macro key, anywhere. It was all just a fib in order to be the winner 
in a debate. It was a very petty thing to do. It is pathological. That's what I 
think. >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 9:27 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Allow me to quote the part of my post you missed (the part at the top, oddly 
enough):
 
 
 So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said I had 
created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I know, there's no 
way to create one "in Neo."
 
 
 And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go into one 
to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.
 
 
 Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.
 
 Barry tries to crawl out of the hole he dug for himself:
 
 << What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program that 
doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" the macro for 
one post, and seemingly with the only "edit" being to delete a leading 
parentheses.
 
 The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the same 
blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's something deeply 
pathological about that. >>
 
 
 There would be if that were the case, but it isn't.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richard Enigma

[Richard J. Williams]

Well said! Now, about that Rama guy and that levitation event...

On 12/16/2013 9:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


*/Because I've actually been enjoying seeing Judy The Stalker get a 
little taste of her own medicine in the form of one guy doing to her 
what she's done to others for nearly twenty years, I thought I'd throw 
the guy a bone and write a little something positive about Richard 
Williams. Go figure.


The guy's a mystery, that's for sure. He'll make post after post of 
bullshit and trollery, and then throw something personal and almost 
interesting into the mix. I downright like some of his raps about music.


And lately I have come to appreciate some of his interactions with 
Share. I think that the conversations have done both of them a world 
of good.


I still have reservations about his overfondness for prairie dogs, but 
most of my friends have a kink or two. :-)


That's never stood in the way of appreciating their good qualities, so 
I don't see why it should with Richard.

/*

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.
 

 Richard trolled and lied:
 
 << It looks like Judy altered her "macro" once again. In fact, this is either 
a new message that she typed up; or it is a macro message she copied and pasted 
from Microsoft Word; or that she in fact, is fibbing about the whole thing. 
That's what I think. >>
 
 
 On 12/16/2013 9:31 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a 
detailed refutation, let me know.
 
 
 Richard trolled and lied:
 
 
 << So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and 
then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in Word, then 
copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you didn't say that and 
you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the first place. Go figure. 
 We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, but 
your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the reason you 
wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt to avoid a fair 
debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word using just a single 
keystroke anyway. >>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

It looks like Judy altered her "macro" once again. In fact, this is 
either a new message that she typed up; or it is a macro message she 
copied and pasted from Microsoft Word; or that she in fact, is fibbing 
about the whole thing. That's what I think.



On 12/16/2013 9:31 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.



Richard trolled and lied:


<< So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word 
and then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro 
in Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, 
you didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that 
in the first place. Go figure.


We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, 
but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the 
reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish 
attempt to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a 
macro in Word using just a single keystroke anyway. >>

[FairfieldLife] RE: State censorship of radio

[s3raphita]

Re "On my walks I listen to streams on my smart phone rather than AM or even FM 
radio.":
 I'm illiterate as far as new technology goes. Is it that you can access the 
internet on a smart phone without having to rely on a local wi-fi connexion? So 
you use the phone company's regular signal? If so, doesn't that cost per minute?
 

 Over here when they dropped the analogue signal for TV transmissions and we 
all went digital it meant my hand-held mini-TV receiver went in the garbage can 
and there was no equivalent portable digital TV to replace it. 
 
Re "I love all the big corporations losing their asses on their radio and TV 
stations.":
 Bring it on. 
 With me it's not so much the profits that alarm me, it's the monopoly on the 
"narrative" we get fed by the MSM. 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

For the record, Judy said she was going to create a macro key, but she 
failed to reveal that this is impossible using Yahoo Neo. She attempted 
to deceive, and now she is in denial mode. Not to mention that Judy it 
was very unbecoming of her to do this in a fair debate. Everyone can see 
that Judy has altered her "macro"on numerous occasions, proving that  
she in fact, did not set up a macro key, anywhere. It was all just a fib 
in order to be the winner in a debate. It was a very petty thing to do. 
It is pathological. That's what I think.


On 12/16/2013 9:27 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Allow me to quote the part of my post you missed (the part at the top, 
oddly enough):



So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said 
I had created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I 
know, there's no way to create one "in Neo."



And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go 
into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.



Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.


Barry tries to crawl out of the hole he dug for himself:

*/<< What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program 
that doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" 
the macro for one post, and seemingly with the only "edit" being to 
delete a leading parentheses.


The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the 
same blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's 
something deeply pathological about that. >>/*

*/
/*
*There would be if that were the case, but it isn't.
*

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[authfriend]

This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.
 

 Richard trolled and lied:

 << In my opinion, Judy has slandered me on numerous occasions and attempted to 
smear my name. I feel that  this is race-based, because she hates people from 
Texas and all conservatives. And, she encourages others to agree with her. 
 
 She should desist in this kind of behavior- it is contrary to the rules of 
good internet behavior and it is unbecoming of her to do that.
 
  She is unable to engage in a fair debate. If Judy has any rebuttal to any of 
my messages, let her post them and specify what untruths I have posted with the 
date and time. It is my right to post my opinions here any time I feel like it. 
I should be able to do this without harassment and abuse from anyone. That's 
what I think.
 
 Maybe its time to review the Yahoo FairfieldLife Guidelines:
 
 3) All parties who feel aggrieved by any statements within the forum have free 
opportunities to provide a rebuttal to those statements within the forum. >>
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/files/FFL_Guidelines/ 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/files/FFL%20and%20Fairfield%20Community/
 
 On 12/16/2013 9:19 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Richard trolled and lied:
 
 
 << That's your opinion and you are entitled to post it. You are not entitled 
to post remarks that are racist and slanderous. >>
 
 
 Well, I don't do that, but in fact there's no rule against it.
 
 
 >> And it is unbecoming of you to attempt to solicit discussion off-line in an 
 >> attempt to gain an advantage through hearsay and deception. >>
 
 
 It would be unbecoming of me if I'd ever done that, but of course I haven't. 
You made that up.
 
 
 << The very purpose of this thread is so you have the opportunity to engage in 
a fair debate with me and the other respondents on this list. For some reason 
you refuse to engage. I can only assume that it's because a deep-seated 
prejudice that you don't to discuss. >>
 
 
 
 No, as you know, it's because it's not possible to have a rational debate with 
you. You make sure of that.
 
 << We all have some prejudice - nobody is perfect - sometimes we don't even 
realize that we are prejudiced. Since you won't discuss it, we must assume 
that's why you won't debate. It's kind of sad to see you like this - it's a 
very ugly side of you, Judy. It's one thing to denigrate Barry and to pick on 
Share, and it's one thing to not like conservative voters, but it's wrong of 
you to dislike what I say on the basis of my birth circumstances. >>
 
 
 Which, of course, I've never done. Just one more thing you've made up.
 
 << You should post your objections to anything I say right here in public so 
everyone can read it and we can debate it and so everyone can read it and 
decide for themselves. You are being unfair and defensive. We can only assume 
that you have some kind of hidden agenda that you do not want to reveal. Go 
figure. >>
 
 
 Actually you could assume the facts, which are that I've already made my 
"agenda" quite public, which is to make sure newbies and occasional posters 
know (the old-timers and regulars know this already) that you are a troll and a 
liar and that engaging with you only encourages your trolling and lying. I 
think your recent behavior toward me has established that pretty firmly. It 
will probably be necessary to reestablish it at some point if we get a fresh 
crop of newbies, though (unless your behavior changes radically and you give up 
trolling, which I don't expect).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.
 

 (It's fascinating that tech wizards Richard and Barry don't seem to be aware 
that Word isn't the only program to create keyboard macros.)
 

 Richard trolled and lied:

 << Not to mention that Judy thought she was being really clever and thought 
that nobody knew anything about setting "macro keys" in Microsoft Word. 
Obviously Judy told a couple of fibs on this one. 
 
 So, I guess we all know now that she's not all that honest, trying to put one 
over on the newbies on this forum. I guess she forgot that you and I are 
experts in using Word and and we each know it like the back of our hand. 
 
 Apparently Judy will go to just about any length in order to win a debate, 
including name-calling and on down to g outright deception. Go figure. >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
   What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program that doesn't 
support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" the macro for one post, 
and seemingly with the only "edit" being to delete a leading parentheses.
 
 The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the same 
blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's something deeply 
pathological about that. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
"Richard J. Williams" wrote:
 >
 > So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and 
 > then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in 
 > Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you 
 > didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the 
 > first place. Go figure.
 > 
 > We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day, 
 > but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the 
 > reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt 
 > to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word 
 > using just a single keystroke anyway.
 > 
 > I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do 
 > something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a 
 > professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it every 
 > day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it. 
 > That's what I think.
 > 
 > On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
 > >
 > > So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said 
 > > I had created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I 
 > > know, there's no way to create one "in Neo."
 > >
 > >
 > > And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go 
 > > into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.
 > >
 > >
 > > Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.
 > >
 > >
 > > (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine 
 > > what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard 
 > > instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct 
 > > him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using the 
 > > macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and 
 > > lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running 
 > > out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans are a 
 > > different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the 
 > > macro. He's making my point for me.)
 > >
 > >
 > > Barry fails again:
 > >
 > > */<< Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little 
 > > something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make 
 > > Richard's day.
 > >
 > > As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having created 
 > > a "macro" in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's 
 > > commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. >>
 > >
 > > Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-)
 > >
 > > /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 > > mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
 > > >
 > > > This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except 
 > > Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, 
 > > let me know.
 > >
 > >
 >
 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let us, "Give Peace a Chance by being more kind on FF life

[Bhairitu]

You mean you haven't converted the Ram currency to Bitcoins yet? :-D

On 12/16/2013 12:42 PM, wleed3 wrote:


Lets raise the standards of administration here on this cite to a more 
loving & peaceful reflection of our selves here. I have some Ram 
currency , I will share toward that aim. Bucks ideals are great

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

In my opinion, Judy has slandered me on numerous occasions and attempted 
to smear my name. I feel that this is race-based, because she hates 
people from Texas and all conservatives. And, she encourages others to 
agree with her.


She should desist in this kind of behavior- it is contrary to the rules 
of good internet behavior and it is unbecoming of her to do that.


 She is unable to engage in a fair debate. If Judy has any rebuttal to 
any of my messages, let her post them and specify what untruths I have 
posted with the date and time. It is my right to post my opinions here 
any time I feel like it. I should be able to do this without harassment 
and abuse from anyone. That's what I think.


Maybe its time to review the Yahoo FairfieldLife Guidelines:

3) All parties who feel aggrieved by any statements within the forum 
have free opportunities to provide a rebuttal to those statements within 
the forum.


http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/files/FFL_Guidelines/ 



On 12/16/2013 9:19 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Richard trolled and lied:


<< That's your opinion and you are entitled to post it. You are not 
entitled to post remarks that are racist and slanderous. >>


Well, I don't do that, but in fact there's no rule against it.

>> And it is unbecoming of you to attempt to solicit discussion off-line in an 
attempt to gain an advantage through hearsay and deception. >>


It would be unbecoming of me if I'd ever done that, but of course I 
haven't. You made that up.


<< The very purpose of this thread is so you have the opportunity to 
engage in a fair debate with me and the other respondents on this 
list. For some reason you refuse to engage. I can only assume that 
it's because a deep-seated prejudice that you don't to discuss. >>


No, as you know, it's because it's not possible to have a rational 
debate with you. You make sure of that.


<< We all have some prejudice - nobody is perfect - sometimes we don't 
even realize that we are prejudiced. Since you won't discuss it, we 
must assume that's why you won't debate. It's kind of sad to see you 
like this - it's a very ugly side of you, Judy. It's one thing to 
denigrate Barry and to pick on Share, and it's one thing to not like 
conservative voters, but it's wrong of you to dislike what I say on 
the basis of my birth circumstances. >>


Which, of course, I've never done. Just one more thing you've made up.

<< You should post your objections to anything I say right here in 
public so everyone can read it and we can debate it and so everyone 
can read it and decide for themselves. You are being unfair and 
defensive. We can only assume that you have some kind of hidden agenda 
that you do not want to reveal. Go figure. >>


Actually you could assume the facts, which are that I've already made 
my "agenda" quite public, which is to make sure newbies and occasional 
posters know (the old-timers and regulars know this already)that you 
are a troll and a liar and that engaging with you only encourages your 
trolling and lying. I think your recent behavior toward me has 
established that pretty firmly. It will probably be necessary to 
reestablish it at some point if we get a fresh crop of newbies, though 
(unless your behavior changes radically and you give up trolling, 
which I don't expect).

Re: [FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Bhairitu]

FYI, for a TM link to this, Brubeck's first group had Bill Smith on 
clarinet.  Bill joined the staff at the University of Washingtion when I 
went there. I played on some avant garde projects he did.  A few years 
later he showed up at TM residence course with Paul Horn that I attended.



On 12/16/2013 11:23 AM, Richard Williams wrote:

Dave Brubeck

Inline image 1

Dave Brubeck - Take Five ( Original Video)
http://youtu.be/PHdU5sHigYQ

"Take Five" is a jazz piece composed by Paul Desmond and performed by 
The Dave Brubeck Quartet on their 1959 album Time Out. It is the 
best-selling jazz single of all time.


It was first played by the Quartet to a live audience at the Village 
Gate nightclub in New York City in 1959. On the album Time Out, 
Brubeck used a different time signature for each track, which was very 
unusual. "Take Five" written in a 5/4 meter and it was one of the 
first Jazz songs with a time signature other than the standard 4/4 
beat or 3/4 waltz time. It ended up being one of the extremely rare 
Jazz compositions to become a pop hit.


Dave Brubeck – piano
Paul Desmond – alto saxophone
Eugene Wright – bass
Joe Morello – drums

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_Five

'Essential Jazz: The First 100 Years'
by Henry Martin
Thomson Wadsworth 2004

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let us, "Give Peace a Chance by being more kind on FF life

[wleed3]

Lets raise the standards of administration here on this cite to a more loving & 
peaceful reflection of our selves here. I have some Ram currency , I will share 
toward that aim. Bucks ideals are great




In a message dated 12/16/13 11:40:22 Eastern Standard Time, 
dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes:



The updated mediation meditation of Love is here now. Love is downloading even 
as you read this if you are open to reading and then transmitting Love beyond. 
There has been long ago that old humankind testament in covenant of causality 
with the Unified Field and then updated with the Jesus testament of love and 
also the vector of Compassion the Buddha has taught It is quite time to 
download, update and install the New Love now, the Love vector of the Unified 
Field as a mediation of meditation in of the age of science now. All we are 
saying is give peace a chance, it is time for the new Love of mediation 
meditation with others. Love thy neighbor, it is time for group meditation as 
mediation in the world,
-Buck in the Dome 





Misery in the East China Sea, what could any of us do to regenerate 
spirituality there in that part of the world? Download and send the vector of 
Love.. as a field effect of love coherence for the planet and its people. Love 
thy neighbor in mediation of meditation. Demonstrated now by even the evidence 
of science, clearly by mediation of meditation any of us could help 
individually and any could redouble their influence by joining with a group 
nearby in meditation of mediation. The old teaching is updated. One need only 
have the intent, attend to it in heart and sit with it in consciousness. This 
is the simple teaching that Nader Ram now comes with as modern scientific talks 
about Ved and physiology. This is about the modern revolution of 'Love Thy 
Neighbor'. The world can not afford to have old meditators by themselves 
sitting this one out in the cold. This was Maharishi's scientific revelation to 
the modern world, the modern update of George Fox, Francke, Spener, Emerson, J
 esus and all great transcendentalists through time.  It is time for the 
revolution of Love, the modern update to take the place of the old love.   It 
is certainly time to come to meditation for everyone but especially now for 
those who know better.
In Love it is time to march together to the Domes to meditate
and send an update of Love as a truly yahoo kind of kindness by wireless 
spiritual ethernet
of the human heart to these places and these people on the earth who suffer so 
in the hand of their unkindness,
-Buck in the Dome  



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


I ALWAYS CARRY A COPY OF THE THEORY OF ABSOLUTE DEFENCE WITH OR ABOUT ME,( COL. 
LEED RET. US ARMY} & FULL AGREE WITH IT & THE IMPORTANCE OF MEDITATION & HTE 
WORKS DONE IN THE DOMES & ELSEWHERE. excellent THEY ARE THE REAL SOLDIERS OF 
PEACE THANKS  TO YOU ALL WHO SO PRACTICE SUCH  IN fAIRFIELD OR ELSE WHERE. 
PEACE VIA SILENCE sHIVA- SILENCE DISTROYS IGNORANCE ETC. SEE THE NATERARAJ -- 
SHIVA DANCING FOR ITS SYMBOLISM! AGAIN THANKS BUCK.  


i ALSO AGREE TO LET THE ANKLE BITERES BE GONE FROM FAIRFIELDLIFE TO AGAIN RASE 
THE STANDARDS & ENJOY SWEETER WORDS HERE.& SOON! PLEASE RICK

In a message dated 12/15/13 20:06:14 Eastern Standard Time, Buck... writes:
It certainly is time to update Love on the planet. It is time to mediate the 
situation.




Is Buck the only peace-activist on FFL? 
Has anyone else here read the absolute theory of Peace?
Had no experience with it?
-Buck in the Dome  




(French: procédure d'approbation tacite; Latin: qui tacet consentire videtur, 
"he who is silent is taken to agree", "silence implies/means consent") 


A textbook on diplomacy describes the silence procedure thus:
... a proposal with strong support is deemed to have been agreed unless any 
member raises an objection to it before a precise deadline: silence signifies 
assent – or, at least,acquiescence. This procedure relies on a member in a 
minority fearing that raising an objection will expose it to the charge of 
obstructiveness and, thereby, the perils of isolation. Silence procedure is 
employed by NATO, the OSCE, in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security 
Policy of the European Union (EU) and, no doubt, in numerous other 
international bodies.[3]
..and otherwise implies, chickenshits?



All we are saying is “give peace a chance”. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxS8gQ-xHgE 



Like hey, are there no other real peace-activists besides Buck on this FFL 
forum here? Not even a shout-out here on this? Or, is this silence here on a 
serious heart-felt subject like this one as in places where silence means 
agreement, as in “I'm with you”.
Thank You in Love, 
-Buck in the Dome  




Friends; Check your old internal software with its bits and old fragmented 
love, tough broken bits of love fragmented in it. Time now for a defrag of the 
old testaments. A new download of love is available, an update of love,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

Not to mention that Judy thought she was being really clever and thought 
that nobody knew anything about setting "macro keys" in Microsoft Word. 
Obviously Judy told a couple of fibs on this one.


So, I guess we all know now that she's not all that honest, trying to 
put one over on the newbies on this forum. I guess she forgot that you 
and I are experts in using Word and and we each know it like the back of 
our hand.


Apparently Judy will go to just about any length in order to win a 
debate, including name-calling and on down to g outright deception. Go 
figure.


On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


*/What I'd like to know is, having created a "macro" in a program that 
doesn't support them, why would one want to go back and "edit" the 
macro for one post, and seemingly with the only "edit" being to delete 
a leading parentheses.


The lengths some people will go to to avoid saying, "Yes, I type the 
same blurb every time" and "Yes, I made a typo this time." There's 
something deeply pathological about that.


/*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>
> So, how exactly are you going to create macro key in Microsoft Word and
> then transfer it to Neo? You probably meant you'd create a macro in
> Word, then copy and paste the message into the Neo text box. But, you
> didn't say that and you didn't explain why you'd want to do that in the
> first place. Go figure.
>
> We all know that you're at your computer using Microsoft Word all day,
> but your statement was an attempt at deception. Never mind that the
> reason you wanted to do it was goofy as hell and just a foolish attempt
> to avoid a fair debate. Everyone knows you can't create a macro in Word
> using just a single keystroke anyway.
>
> I've got to tell you, Judy - it's pretty low and childish to do
> something like that, if that's what you did, even if you are a
> professional who knows Word like the back of your hand and uses it 
every

> day. It's not a fair and balanced thing to do and I think you know it.
> That's what I think.
>
> On 12/16/2013 7:44 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
> >
> > So sorry to spoil your fun, Barry, but you goofed again. I never said
> > I had created a macro "in Neo." That was Richard's lie. As far as I
> > know, there's no way to create one "in Neo."
> >
> >
> > And, of course, macros can easily leave out a parenthesis if you go
> > into one to edit it and end up accidentally deleting the paren.
> >
> >
> > Too bad, Barry. Better luck next time.
> >
> >
> > (Plus which, if you think what's been going on is bad, just imagine
> > what it would have been like if I'd attempted to engage with Richard
> > instead. Remember what happened when Michael kept trying to correct
> > him about Michael's TM history? Y'all should be grateful I'm using 
the

> > macro. At least this way he has to keep thinking up new trolls and
> > lies as I shut the old ones down one by one. He's obviously running
> > out of ideas now, and the trolls are becoming so absurd--Texans are a
> > different race from the rest of us??--I hardly even need to post the
> > macro. He's making my point for me.)
> >
> >
> > Barry fails again:
> >
> > */<< Just for fun, and since she seems to be melting, here's a little
> > something to help wash the wicked witch down the drain and make
> > Richard's day.
> >
> > As he has pointed out several times, she is lying about having 
created

> > a "macro" in Neo to keep reposting her attempts to deflect Richard's
> > commentary by calling him a liar. Well, below is the proof. >>
> >
> > Macros don't leave out parentheses. :-)
> >
> > /*--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
> > >
> > > This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here except
> > Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation,
> > let me know.
> >
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Say, Barry, remember this from alt.m.t from 1995? I followed a link in
 one of Richard's old posts here just out of curiosity, and stumbled
 across this as well. Want to guess who it was from?
 

 And my objection to shoki [Barry's handle at the time] is that he's
 drifted from one abusive cult to another throughout his adult life without
 a clue: first TM, then little Freddie Lenz/Rama, who knows what else -- 
 all the while practicing the verbal abuse he learned within them on
 former cult members, critics, journalists, anyone with whom he disagrees.
 Ari is clearly courageous enough to share extremely personal details of
her life with the public at large -- in the apparent hope that people can
draw their own conclusions from it. Ari, I admire your consistent courage
and insight.
 Barry Wright (shoki) is apparently cowardly enough to abuse her
vulnerability. Barry, I cordially despise your verbal violence. (BTW,
Wright's public posts are only a fraction of his output. Many of us, in
comparing notes, receive abusive personal email from him as well.)
 For those reading who wonder what it's like to be inside a cult, I can say
from personal experience that it's very much like a conversation with
Barry Wright: abusive, condenscending, elitist, without respect for
personal boundaries or feelings. The only real difference is that, in the
depths of a cult, this invasive abuse goes on day after day, 24 hours a
day.
 Fortunately, now being free, we ex-cult members can now choose not to read
Wright's vile posts.
 Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

Judy has fer sure latched on to this thread, even though it's supposed 
to be about me, "Professor Post".


Hey, Judy - is it alright with you for me to post here on this thread 
about me for just about two minutes to express my opinion? Is that 
alright with you? I do not need a detailed refutation from you or anyone 
else, about what I think, but if you could manage it, I could do with a 
little less ankle-biting.


Seriously, thanks. If I change my mind, I will let you know in a Yahoo Mail.

On 12/16/2013 9:15 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*This is all trolling and lying, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno and, obviously, Richard) takes Richard seriously enough 
to want a detailed refutation, let me know.*


*
*

*Richard trolled and lied:*


<< It's typical Judy-speak. She's been doing this for years. She did 
it with Barry, with me, with Curtis, with Vaj, and even with Lawson. 
She will latch on to some minor point of contention and just obsess on 
it to no end, long after anyone else even knows what she is talking 
about. Then she will clam up and refuse to engage in any meaningful 
dialog.


Why is it so difficult for her to post her reasons for the dislike? Is 
it my face, or where I live, or my political point of view? She 
obviously has a way with words and is intelligent. I can understand 
the shunning from Barry, but at least he's not trying to ankle-bite me 
when I pass by every day. And, it is kind of funny to watch Barry push 
her buttons, you've got to admit. LoL!


Then, she will incessantly post slanderous remarks in an attempt to 
sway others to join her in a shunning. She even gets others to join 
in, Bill is a case in point. Why in the world would Bill call me a 
troll for trying to engage him in a spiritual conversation? It just 
doesn't make any sense.


You won't find very many dialogs between me and Judy if you do a 
search - it's been at least ten years since I had a conversation with 
her about anything. But, you can find hundreds, if not thousands of 
remarks she has posted calling me a liar and a troll.


Which apparently prompted you to ask: What is she talking about like 
that with Richard? Nobody really knows anymore, or cares, but it's my 
thread so maybe I will continue this and post my opinions of Judy for 
a few years.


But, it is really taking away from my time composing messages about 
spiritual paths, music, and what I've been doing. What is really sad 
though, is that her constant ankle-biting is causing other respondents 
to quit this group and go elsewhere, and maybe that's her goal. In the 
case of me and Barry, it just didn't work and that really seems to 
upset her.


She's like a schoolyard bully that won't stop until she is expelled 
from school, and then she will enroll in another school and start 
bullying those poor kids. She followed me over here from Google Groups 
and has been harassing me for at least ten years here. Go figure. >>

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

My objections to the negative comments of MJ have nothing to do with the 
fact that he was born in North Carolina, or that Judy lives in New 
Jersey, or that you live up in Canada. This is just misdirection on your 
part. I do not feel bad about where I live - it's just that it is not 
fair to slander people in a fair debate. It is considered to be very bad 
form, that's all, and you should in future refrain from this kind of 
reference at my expense. That's all I'm saying - it's not fair.


This is supposed to be a spiritual forum, not a place to make fun of 
people based on their birth circumstances.


In fact, there are numerous races of people that live in and call Texas 
home: Caucasians, African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. 
When you group people together for the purpose of denigration, it is wrong.


There are also many people of German, French, and other cultures - that 
why they call it "Six Flags over Texas". In addition, there are many 
Cajuns and Creoles that live here as well. Not everyone wears 10 gallon 
hats and go to square dances.


There have been six flags over Texas: Spain (1519-1685; 1690-1821), 
France (1685-1690), Mexico (1821-1836), the Republic of Texas 
(1836-1845), the Confederate States of America (1861-1865), and the 
United States (1845-1861; 1865-present).


There are no Hardee's establishments in Texas, so far as I can tell.

http://www.hardees.com/locations

On 12/16/2013 9:12 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate 
conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and 
you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice 
is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in 
point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on 
my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is 
wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or 
leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments 
about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy 
and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think.


You are a hypocrite Ricky. You have bothered and jibbed at MJ, you are 
constantly criticizing and annoying virtually everyone here with you 
never-ending little boy juvenile verbal pokings about things you know 
are not true. You are insulting and purposefully misleading and 
twisting facts. Just like the one about being "racist". First, dear 
boy, Texas is not filled with people of a different "race", it is 
filled with Texans and I like to bug you about being from Texas 
because it is one of those places where it is really easy to make 
stereotypical comments - just like New York and Newfoundland and a 
hundred other places including Fairfield Iowa, home of the original 
"roo". So don't start crying about "racist" comments without being in 
danger of being laughed at - heartily. But because your fragile self 
seems to require an apology here it is:


Dear Ricky, I am very sorry if I inadvertently, or in some way which 
is damaging to your mind or psyche, said something about you being 
from Texas that has made you depressed or feel badly about yourself. I 
admit that it is my own inability to appreciate those who wear 10 
gallon hats to the local square dance where guns are not required to 
be checked at the door and and whose idea of fine dining is to visit 
their local strip mall to eat at Hardees.


There, I hope this has made it up to you and I will attempt to watch 
my racist (although I think it is more accurate to say cultural) 
prejudices in the future. But just be aware that you, too, should 
watch the ranting and raving and trolling. At least you've left MJ 
alone, finally.



On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@...  wrote:

*This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.

*

*
Richard trolled and lied:*

<< You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. 
You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, 
perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, 
and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they 
should speak up.


Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. >>

On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@...  wrote:

This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, 
let me know.



Richard trolled:


<< It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to 
shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted 
Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno 
because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just 
like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[authfriend]

More Richard bullshit. You used "willytex" as your handle for a long time. Then 
you used a lot of other silly handles (in many cases concurrently) based on the 
word "pundit" (which you've used here as well). Those obviously didn't fit you. 
Once you've used a handle that sticks, you need to resign yourself to people 
using it. In any event, you appeared to object to "willytex" just for the sake 
of having something to object to in my posts.
 

 Barry called you "willytex" as late as mid-November (referring to you as an 
"attention troll," BTW), and you didn't complain. Share has called you 
willytex, so have plenty of others. You referred to yourself as willytex in 
October 2012.
 

 Nope, sorry, not a valid complaint.
 

 (And FWIW, it didn't occur to me back then that it had anything to do with 
"Texas." Didn't register with me that you were from Texas for a long time.)
 

 Oh, plus which, you've posted your photo here and are possibly the least 
Hispanic-looking person I've ever seen, so you can't use that to cry racism 
either. Not to mention that your last name is "Williams."
 

 Nope nope nope, just more trolling. As I pointed out to Barry, it's getting 
dumber and dumber.
 

 Richard trolled:
 
 << For the record, Judy called me "willytex" for years after I told her my 
name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. And, for the 
record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the general population. And, 
also for the record, Judy did not post an objection when Ann posted numerous 
messages denigrating people that live in Texas. Where I come from, silence 
usually indicates agreement. We do not take kindly to racial profiling. It was 
wrong of Judy and Ann to do this in a fair debate. That's what I think. >>
 
 On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Share pandered:
 
 
 << Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could think 
of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not suffer. >>
 
 
 
 
 How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly to call 
prejudice against Texans "racism"? (And while you're at it, you might want to 
see if you can remember anything I've ever said against Texans. Could Richard 
have been lying about that, do you think?) And here's a tip: he isn't 
suffering. He loves it when he can stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he 
genuinely doesn't care what folks think about him.
 
 
 << I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting content, style 
and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies written about you and 
some people won't. >>
 
 
 
 As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about 
Richard, even when he's lied about others.
 
 
 << You don't have much control over what people think and believe. Anyway, I 
hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 
great rock stars, etc. >>
 
 
 FWIW, I have no objection to his "knowledge posts" or the "100 great" posts. 
The "What I did today"-type posts are fine if what he did today was something 
interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your responses to them, IMHO). 
Those types of posts from him are actually trolls; he's aiming to get people to 
complain about how boring they are so he can make a big fuss about the 
complaints.
 
 
 << You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: >>
 
 
 Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually 
counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end up looking 
insincere, and that doesn't do him any good.
 




 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let us, "Give Peace a Chance"I COL LEED HVE READ IT& FULL AGREE WITH Buck

[wleed3]

And to do so here in Fairfield Life to make it more sweet sounding in emails 
here delete the users of sour language to express them selves in less than a 
kind manor.



Let Buck become an administrator 4 a month or so & raise our standards
In a message dated 12/16/13 14:08:04 Eastern Standard Time, 
dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes:



Look this ain't just some theory or theology of peace. This is peace-activism 
as direct-action; disciplined practicum as mediation and practical in the 
world. Deeply spiritual and scientific at the same time. Only ignorant 
science-haters can deny the facts of peace-making now. It is time to deploy 
peace-making mediation meditation all around the world.
-Buck




The updated mediation meditation of Love is here now. Love is downloading even 
as you read this if you are open to reading and then transmitting Love beyond. 
There has been long ago that old humankind testament in covenant of causality 
with the Unified Field and then updated with the Jesus testament of love and 
also the vector of Compassion the Buddha has taught.   


 It is quite time to download, update and install the New Love now, the Love 
vector of the Unified Field as a mediation of meditation in of the age of 
science now. All we are saying is give peace a chance, it is time for the new 
Love of mediation meditation with others. Love thy neighbor, it is time for 
group meditation as mediation in the world,
-Buck in the Dome 





Misery in the East China Sea, what could any of us do to regenerate 
spirituality there in that part of the world? Download and send the vector of 
Love.. as a field effect of love coherence for the planet and its people. Love 
thy neighbor in mediation of meditation. Demonstrated now by even the evidence 
of science, clearly by mediation of meditation any of us could help 
individually and any could redouble their influence by joining with a group 
nearby in meditation of mediation. The old teaching is updated. One need only 
have the intent, attend to it in heart and sit with it in consciousness. This 
is the simple teaching that Nader Ram now comes with as modern scientific talks 
about Ved and physiology. This is about the modern revolution of 'Love Thy 
Neighbor'. The world can not afford to have old meditators by themselves 
sitting this one out in the cold. This was Maharishi's scientific revelation to 
the modern world, the modern update of George Fox, Francke, Spener, Emerson, J
 esus and all great transcendentalists through time.  It is time for the 
revolution of Love, the modern update to take the place of the old love.   It 
is certainly time to come to meditation for everyone but especially now for 
those who know better.
In Love it is time to march together to the Domes to meditate
and send an update of Love as a truly yahoo kind of kindness by wireless 
spiritual ethernet
of the human heart to these places and these people on the earth who suffer so 
in the hand of their unkindness,
-Buck in the Dome  



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


I ALWAYS CARRY A COPY OF THE THEORY OF ABSOLUTE DEFENCE WITH OR ABOUT ME,( COL. 
LEED RET. US ARMY} & FULL AGREE WITH IT & THE IMPORTANCE OF MEDITATION & HTE 
WORKS DONE IN THE DOMES & ELSEWHERE. excellent THEY ARE THE REAL SOLDIERS OF 
PEACE THANKS  TO YOU ALL WHO SO PRACTICE SUCH  IN fAIRFIELD OR ELSE WHERE. 
PEACE VIA SILENCE sHIVA- SILENCE DISTROYS IGNORANCE ETC. SEE THE NATERARAJ -- 
SHIVA DANCING FOR ITS SYMBOLISM! AGAIN THANKS BUCK.  


i ALSO AGREE TO LET THE ANKLE BITERES BE GONE FROM FAIRFIELDLIFE TO AGAIN RASE 
THE STANDARDS & ENJOY SWEETER WORDS HERE.& SOON! PLEASE RICK

In a message dated 12/15/13 20:06:14 Eastern Standard Time, Buck... writes:
It certainly is time to update Love on the planet. It is time to mediate the 
situation.




Is Buck the only peace-activist on FFL? 
Has anyone else here read the absolute theory of Peace?
Had no experience with it?
-Buck in the Dome  




(French: procédure d'approbation tacite; Latin: qui tacet consentire videtur, 
"he who is silent is taken to agree", "silence implies/means consent") 


A textbook on diplomacy describes the silence procedure thus:
... a proposal with strong support is deemed to have been agreed unless any 
member raises an objection to it before a precise deadline: silence signifies 
assent – or, at least,acquiescence. This procedure relies on a member in a 
minority fearing that raising an objection will expose it to the charge of 
obstructiveness and, thereby, the perils of isolation. Silence procedure is 
employed by NATO, the OSCE, in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security 
Policy of the European Union (EU) and, no doubt, in numerous other 
international bodies.[3]
..and otherwise implies, chickenshits?



All we are saying is “give peace a chance”. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxS8gQ-xHgE 



Like hey, are there no other real peace-activists besides Buck on this FFL 
forum here? Not even a shout-out here on t

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Mon 16-Dec-13 00:15:04 UTC

[Richard J. Williams]

For the record, there are only two respondents on this list that attend 
regular meditation sessions in the dome. There is one respondent that 
has never tried TM. At least three of the current respondents on this 
list do not meditate at all, and two are self-proclaimed atheists. There 
are no Buddhists on this list, as far as I can tell. There is only one 
person on this list that is from Texas - the one you post derogatory 
references to in an attempt to smear. That's what I think.


If I am mistaken, please let me know. If there are any others that 
consider themselves to be on a spiritual path, please post your path 
here, so we can discuss it. Thanks.



On 12/16/2013 8:58 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:


Dear Buck. This forum is a beautiful example of all the spirituality 
the average human being on this planet can muster - and these are 
people who have meditated or are still meditating and pursuing what 
they like to think of as a spiritual and informed life. You need to 
understand this and accept it. Although I don't consider myself a 
pessimist I do understand human nature for what it can be in its 
finest and its lowest moments. TM, Buddhism or attending the Dome 
regularly doesn't appear to allow most people here to transcend the 
petty squabbles and deep differences that characterize the rest of the 
world - even those from that special place we call "Texas" are not 
immune from exhibiting these less-than-charitable traits.

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

This is an example of ankle-biting. Neither Judy nor Ann know whether or 
not I am suffering and neither of them care, anyway. All they care about 
is their own egos - they are not fit to debate in a fair and balanced 
manner. That's what I think - they are both ankle-biters and mean.


On 12/16/2013 8:57 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could 
think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not 
suffer. I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting 
content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies 
written about you and some people won't. You don't have much control 
over what people think and believe. Anyway, I hope you'll continue 
writing your knowledge posts and what I did today and 100 great rock 
stars, etc. You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. 
IMHO (-:


Sorry, I couldn't resist. Share, FYI, Ricky is not "suffering" and you 
know it. OK, moving on (it won't happen again).




On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams 
 wrote:
In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate 
conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and 
you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice 
is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in 
point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on 
my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is 
wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or 
leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments 
about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy 
and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think.



On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@...  wrote:

*This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.

*
*
Richard trolled and lied:*

<< You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. 
You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, 
perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, 
and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they 
should speak up.


Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. >>

On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@...  wrote:

This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, 
let me know.


Richard trolled:

<< It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to 
shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted 
Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno 
because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just 
like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is.


Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She 
thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost 
everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a 
junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to 
me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I 
can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with 
her - not one. That's what I think. >>


On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote:

Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already 
been dozens. So I'm really curious. Especially since you had not 
been involved in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a 
little fun shoveling snow and will have wonderful holidays.




On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, "anartaxius@..." 
   wrote:
Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research 
Share. The remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is 
dishing out.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
,  
 wrote:


Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Share, you're full of it. You just expressed bitterness and indignation and 
resentment.
 
Share denies having the feelings she expressed:

 << Emily and Judy, I don't feel bitterness or indignation or resentment 
towards Ann. These are all your biased interpretations. >>
 

 And having denied them, she can't find the words to characterize what she 
would like us to believe she was feeling.
 

 She can't even find the words to describe what's wrong with Emily's (and my) 
supposition.
 

 Can you say, "out of touch with her feelings"? Looks like this is Share's 
biggest problem, right there.  She is in denial of her feelings. She can talk 
about them without recognizing them.
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:09 PM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
 

 Share: LOL!  Read your own words.  You are holding *some feeling I identified 
as possibly resentment* (is it fear Share?  What feeling is it?) because you 
think Ann has expressed disapproval of your apologies (what apologies, if I may 
be so bold, have you ever made?) and also you are clearly (insert some feeling 
here) about thinking Ann has been snarky (not that you ever are, right?) 
therefore, you have determined that you don't need to take any responsibility 
for what you say.  The definition of "resentment" is: "bitter indignation at 
having been treated unfairly."  Now, what about my supposition is wrong again?  
 
 

 Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. 
Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her 
attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the 
times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event 
when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what 
you have to say.

 Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a 
statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as 
their opinion. 
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
   Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest 
about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.*  This 
is the way that criminals think Share.  Check yourself, for god's sake.  
 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Richard J. Williams]

For the record, Judy called me "willytex" for years after I told her my 
name was Richard. In my opinion Judy was making fun of Texans. And, for 
the record, where I live, Hispanics make up 63% of the general 
population. And, also for the record, Judy did not post an objection 
when Ann posted numerous messages denigrating people that live in Texas. 
Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. We do not take 
kindly to racial profiling. It was wrong of Judy and Ann to do this in a 
fair debate. That's what I think.


On 12/16/2013 8:33 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Share pandered:


<< Richard, I like you and enjoy most of your posts and I wish I could 
think of what to say so that you can be at peace with all this and not 
suffer. >>


How about explaining to Richard that it makes him look awfully silly 
to call prejudice against Texans "racism"? (And while you're at it, 
you might want to see if you can remember anything I've ever said 
against Texans. Could Richard have been lying about that, do you 
think?) And here's a tip: he isn't suffering. He loves it when he can 
stir up controversy. And unlike Barry, he genuinely doesn't care what 
folks think about him.



<< I don't think people are gonna change much in their posting 
content, style and amount. Furterhmore, some people will believe lies 
written about you and some people won't. >>



As far as I can recall, nobody here--including me--has ever lied about 
Richard, even when he's lied about others.



<< You don't have much control over what people think and believe. 
Anyway, I hope you'll continue writing your knowledge posts and what I 
did today and 100 great rock stars, etc. >>


FWIW, I have no objection to his "knowledge posts" or the "100 great" 
posts. The "What I did today"-type posts are fine if what he did today 
was something interesting, but usually it isn't (same with your 
responses to them, IMHO). Those types of posts from him are actually 
trolls; he's aiming to get people to complain about how boring they 
are so he can make a big fuss about the complaints.


<< You bring a lot of fun and kindness and expansion to FFL. IMHO (-: >>

Oh, please. You really don't need to fawn over him. It's actually 
counterproductive, because when you wildly exaggerate, you just end up 
looking insincere, and that doesn't do him any good.




On Monday, December 16, 2013 6:34 AM, Richard J. Williams 
 wrote:
In my opinion, you don't like people from Texas and you hate 
conservatives. You are attempting to silence me by posting slander and 
you are fibbing and being trollish yourself. Your racism and prejudice 
is pernicious and sometimes tends to affect others. Ann is a case in 
point: on numerous occasions she has posted racist comments based on 
my birth circumstances. That is wrong of her to do that and it is 
wrong for you to support such. You should both either apologize or 
leave the group. That's what I think. Posting derogatory comments 
about where people are from or where they were born is rank hypocrisy 
and has no place on a spiritual forum. That's what I think.



On 12/15/2013 9:08 PM, authfriend@...  wrote:

*This is all trolling and lies, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here 
(except Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed 
refutation, let me know.

*
*
Richard trolled and lied:*

<< You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. 
You hate people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, 
perpetual, petty, ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, 
and I don't see anyone else here that disagrees. If they do, they 
should speak up.


Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. >>

On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@...  wrote:

This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except 
Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, 
let me know.


Richard trolled:

<< It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to 
shut up. Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted 
Curtis, Barry, and Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno 
because she is afraid of him because he is smarter that she is, just 
like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she is.


Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She 
thinks she owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost 
everything as a personal affront. She has been compared to a 
junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to 
me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all that time, I 
can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do with 
her - not one. That's what I think. >>

[FairfieldLife] Essential Jazz

[Richard Williams]

Dave Brubeck

[image: Inline image 1]

Dave Brubeck - Take Five ( Original Video)
http://youtu.be/PHdU5sHigYQ

"Take Five" is a jazz piece composed by Paul Desmond and performed by The
Dave Brubeck Quartet on their 1959 album Time Out. It is the best-selling
jazz single of all time.

It was first played by the Quartet to a live audience at the Village Gate
nightclub in New York City in 1959. On the album Time Out, Brubeck used a
different time signature for each track, which was very unusual. "Take
Five" written in a 5/4 meter and it was one of the first Jazz songs with a
time signature other than the standard 4/4 beat or 3/4 waltz time. It ended
up being one of the extremely rare Jazz compositions to become a pop hit.

Dave Brubeck – piano
Paul Desmond – alto saxophone
Eugene Wright – bass
Joe Morello – drums

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_Five

'Essential Jazz: The First 100 Years'
by Henry Martin
Thomson Wadsworth 2004

[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[authfriend]

I wrote:
 > Good grief, Share, you just admitted you were holding a resentment

 Barry said:
 
<< And you never have. That kinda says it all about the quality of the person, 
doesn't it?  :-) >>
 

 She's actually done so many times. In this case, here she is admitting 
resentment:
 

 "Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. 
Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her 
attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the 
times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event 
when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what 
you have to say."

What does it say about "the quality of the person" Barry is that he can't 
recognize resentment (at least in Share) when he sees it? (Or, more likely, 
that he's pretending not to see it for the sake of stalking me?)

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Let us, "Give Peace a Chance"I COL LEED HVE READ IT& FULL AGREE WITH bUCK

[dhamiltony2k5]

Look this ain't just some theory or theology of peace. This is peace-activism 
as direct-action; disciplined practicum as mediation and practical in the 
world. Deeply spiritual and scientific at the same time. Only ignorant 
science-haters can deny the facts of peace-making now. It is time to deploy 
peace-making mediation meditation all around the world.
 
 -Buck
 


 The updated mediation meditation of Love is here now. Love is downloading even 
as you read this if you are open to reading and then transmitting Love beyond. 
There has been long ago that old humankind testament in covenant of causality 
with the Unified Field and then updated with the Jesus testament of love and 
also the vector of Compassion the Buddha has taught.   
 

  It is quite time to download, update and install the New Love now, the Love 
vector of the Unified Field as a mediation of meditation in of the age of 
science now. All we are saying is give peace a chance, it is time for the new 
Love of mediation meditation with others. Love thy neighbor, it is time for 
group meditation as mediation in the world,
 -Buck in the Dome 
 
 
 
 

 Misery in the East China Sea, what could any of us do to regenerate 
spirituality there in that part of the world? Download and send the vector of 
Love.. as a field effect of love coherence for the planet and its people. Love 
thy neighbor in mediation of meditation. Demonstrated now by even the evidence 
of science, clearly by mediation of meditation any of us could help 
individually and any could redouble their influence by joining with a group 
nearby in meditation of mediation. The old teaching is updated. One need only 
have the intent, attend to it in heart and sit with it in consciousness. This 
is the simple teaching that Nader Ram now comes with as modern scientific talks 
about Ved and physiology. This is about the modern revolution of 'Love Thy 
Neighbor'. The world can not afford to have old meditators by themselves 
sitting this one out in the cold. This was Maharishi's scientific revelation to 
the modern world, the modern update of George Fox, Francke, Spener, Emerson, 
Jesus and all great transcendentalists through time.  It is time for the 
revolution of Love, the modern update to take the place of the old love.   It 
is certainly time to come to meditation for everyone but especially now for 
those who know better.
 In Love it is time to march together to the Domes to meditate
 and send an update of Love as a truly yahoo kind of kindness by wireless 
spiritual ethernet
 of the human heart to these places and these people on the earth who suffer so 
in the hand of their unkindness,
 
 -Buck in the Dome  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I ALWAYS CARRY A COPY OF THE THEORY OF ABSOLUTE DEFENCE WITH OR ABOUT ME,( 
COL. LEED RET. US ARMY} & FULL AGREE WITH IT & THE IMPORTANCE OF MEDITATION & 
HTE WORKS DONE IN THE DOMES & ELSEWHERE. excellent THEY ARE THE REAL SOLDIERS 
OF PEACE THANKS  TO YOU ALL WHO SO PRACTICE SUCH  IN fAIRFIELD OR ELSE WHERE. 
PEACE VIA SILENCE sHIVA- SILENCE DISTROYS IGNORANCE ETC. SEE THE NATERARAJ -- 
SHIVA DANCING FOR ITS SYMBOLISM! AGAIN THANKS BUCK.  
  
  

 i ALSO AGREE TO LET THE ANKLE BITERES BE GONE FROM FAIRFIELDLIFE TO AGAIN RASE 
THE STANDARDS & ENJOY SWEETER WORDS HERE.& SOON! PLEASE RICK
  
 In a message dated 12/15/13 20:06:14 Eastern Standard Time, Buck... writes:
 It certainly is time to update Love on the planet. It is time to mediate the 
situation.
 


 Is Buck the only peace-activist on FFL? 
 Has anyone else here read the absolute theory of Peace?
 Had no experience with it?
 -Buck in the Dome  
 


 (French: procédure d'approbation tacite; Latin: qui tacet consentire videtur, 
"he who is silent is taken to agree", "silence implies/means consent") 
 

 A textbook on diplomacy describes the silence procedure thus:
 ... a proposal with strong support is deemed to have been agreed unless any 
member raises an objection to it before a precise deadline: silence signifies 
assent – or, at least,acquiescence. This procedure relies on a member in a 
minority fearing that raising an objection will expose it to the charge of 
obstructiveness and, thereby, the perils of isolation. Silence procedure is 
employed by NATO, the OSCE, in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security 
Policy of the European Union (EU) and, no doubt, in numerous other 
international bodies.[3] ..and otherwise implies, chickenshits? 

 All we are saying is “give peace a chance”. 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxS8gQ-xHgE 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxS8gQ-xHgE 
 

 Like hey, are there no other real peace-activists besides Buck on this FFL 
forum here? Not even a shout-out here on this? Or, is this silence here on a 
serious heart-felt subject like this one as in places where silence means 
agreement, as in “I'm with you”.
 Thank You in Love, 
 -Buck in the Dome  
 


 
 Friends; Check your old internal software with its bits and ol

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Share Long]

Emily and Judy, I don't feel bitterness or indignation or resentment towards 
Ann. These are all your biased interpretations.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:09 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

Share: LOL!  Read your own words.  You are holding *some feeling I identified 
as possibly resentment* (is it fear Share?  What feeling is it?) because you 
think Ann has expressed disapproval of your apologies (what apologies, if I may 
be so bold, have you ever made?) and also you are clearly (insert some feeling 
here) about thinking Ann has been snarky (not that you ever are, right?) 
therefore, you have determined that you don't need to take any responsibility 
for what you say.  The definition of "resentment" is: "bitter indignation at 
having been treated unfairly."  Now, what about my supposition is wrong again?  
 

Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. 
Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her 
attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the 
times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event 
when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what 
you have to say.


Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a 
statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as 
their opinion. 





On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
  
Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest 
about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.*  This 
is the way that criminals think Share.  Check yourself, for god's sake.  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Professor Post

[TurquoiseB]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
> Good grief, Share, you just admitted you were holding a resentment

And you never have. That kinda says it all about the quality of the
person, doesn't it?  :-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[emilymaenot]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
 

 Share: LOL!  Read your own words.  You are holding *some feeling I identified 
as possibly resentment* (is it fear Share?  What feeling is it?) because you 
think Ann has expressed disapproval of your apologies (what apologies, if I may 
be so bold, have you ever made?) and also you are clearly (insert some feeling 
here) about thinking Ann has been snarky (not that you ever are, right?) 
therefore, you have determined that you don't need to take any responsibility 
for what you say.  The definition of "resentment" is: "bitter indignation at 
having been treated unfairly."  Now, what about my supposition is wrong again?  
 
 

 Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. 
Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her 
attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the 
times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event 
when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what 
you have to say.

 Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a 
statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as 
their opinion. 
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
   Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest 
about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.*  This 
is the way that criminals think Share.  Check yourself, for god's sake.  
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Good grief, Share, you just admitted you were holding a resentment:
 

 "Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. 
Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her 
attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the 
times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event 
when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what 
you have to say."

 
I can't even think of a word to describe what Share just wrote, it's so out of 
touch with reality:

 << Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a 
statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as 
their opinion. >>
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
   Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest 
about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.*  This 
is the way that criminals think Share.  Check yourself, for god's sake.  
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richard Enigma

[authfriend]

It's not a compliment, and your stated reasons for taking it as such are so 
amazingly obtuse it's impossible to believe you believe them. Which only proves 
my point about your own dishonesty.
 

 << Judy, thanks, I take it as a compliment that you put me in a group with 
turq and Richard. Whatever else their faults, I don't think either of them 
attempts to create barriers to truth finding as much as you do. >>
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:29 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   Share squirmed:
 
 << Judy, I disagree with your assessment of me and my posts and with your 
assessment of others whom you have called liar. >>
 

 Of course you do, Share. That's what liars do, try to cast discredit on the 
truthtellers even in the face of unimpeachable evidence.
 

 << You have used that word too much and in such circumstances and, more 
importantly, for such purposes that you actually often create a barrier to 
finding truth rather than an aid. >>

 

 I call a spade a spade. There's no point pussyfooting around when someone has 
said something knowingly untruthful. Not calling people on their deliberate 
falsehoods is what creates a barrier to finding truth.
 

 There are three active posters currently on FFL who tell lies as a matter of 
course: you, Richard, and Barry. More than anything else that happens here, 
this degrades the quality of the community and the conversation, because it 
fosters distrust and dislike and generates what Buck has been calling 
"unkindness." And lying to denigrate other members is the most unkind of all.
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:47 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   I've never lied about you, Share, and you know it. But you have told 
falsehoods about me, about Ann, about Emily, about Raunchy, about others--even 
about yourself. You know that too. And I've documented many of the falsehoods.
 
Share lied:

 << Judy, I know how you have lied about me. Therefore I don't believe it when 
you say someone else has lied. >>
 

 Despite the evidence. Not surprising you would say this when you yourself have 
refused to admit your own documented falsehoods.
 

 << This will not change. >>
 

 No, I don't imagine it will. You're incapable of functioning any other way 
than by denying reality.
 

 << Also, I don't find Richard to be a troll. >>
 

 Even Barry acknowledges Richard's trolling. He's been known as a troll since 
way back on alt.m.t. As they say, Richard's picture illustrates the 
encyclopedia entry on trolling. IOW, he's the very image of a troll; his 
behavior defines trolling.
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:25 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   Lying and trolling are courageous?? What an interesting set of ethics you 
have.
 
Share fawned:

 << Yep, turq, I think Richard's been pretty courageous these past few weeks. >>








 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richard Enigma

[Share Long]

Judy, thanks, I take it as a compliment that you put me in a group with turq 
and Richard. Whatever else their faults, I don't think either of them attempts 
to create barriers to truth finding as much as you do.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:29 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Share squirmed:


<< Judy, I disagree with your assessment of me and my posts and with your 
assessment of others whom you have called liar. >>

Of course you do, Share. That's what liars do, try to cast discredit on the 
truthtellers even in the face of unimpeachable evidence.

<< You have used that word too much and in such circumstances and, more 
importantly, for such purposes that you actually often create a barrier to 
finding truth rather than an aid. >>


I call a spade a spade. There's no point pussyfooting around when someone has 
said something knowingly untruthful. Not calling people on their deliberate 
falsehoods is what creates a barrier to finding truth.

There are three active posters currently on FFL who tell lies as a matter of 
course: you, Richard, and Barry. More than anything else that happens here, 
this degrades the quality of the community and the conversation, because it 
fosters distrust and dislike and generates what Buck has been calling 
"unkindness." And lying to denigrate other members is the most unkind of all.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:47 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
  
I've never lied about you, Share, and you know it. But you have told falsehoods 
about me, about Ann, about Emily, about Raunchy, about others--even about 
yourself. You know that too. And I've documented many of the falsehoods.

Share lied:


<< Judy, I know how you have lied about me. Therefore I don't believe it when 
you say someone else has lied. >>

Despite the evidence. Not surprising you would say this when you yourself have 
refused to admit your own documented falsehoods.

<< This will not change. >>

No, I don't imagine it will. You're incapable of functioning any other way than 
by denying reality.

<< Also, I don't find Richard to be a troll. >>

Even Barry acknowledges Richard's trolling. He's been known as a troll since 
way back on alt.m.t. As they say, Richard's picture illustrates the 
encyclopedia entry on trolling. IOW, he's the very image of a troll; his 
behavior defines trolling.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:25 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
  
Lying and trolling are courageous?? What an interesting set of ethics you have.

Share fawned:


<< Yep, turq, I think Richard's been pretty courageous these past few weeks. >>

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Share Long]

Emily, your first sentence is the way that bullies communicate. They make a 
statement about how another person feels inside without acknowledging it as 
their opinion. 





On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:18 AM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest 
about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.*  This 
is the way that criminals think Share.  Check yourself, for god's sake.  

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richard Enigma

[authfriend]

Share squirmed:
 
 << Judy, I disagree with your assessment of me and my posts and with your 
assessment of others whom you have called liar. >>
 

 Of course you do, Share. That's what liars do, try to cast discredit on the 
truthtellers even in the face of unimpeachable evidence.
 

 << You have used that word too much and in such circumstances and, more 
importantly, for such purposes that you actually often create a barrier to 
finding truth rather than an aid. >>

 

 I call a spade a spade. There's no point pussyfooting around when someone has 
said something knowingly untruthful. Not calling people on their deliberate 
falsehoods is what creates a barrier to finding truth.
 

 There are three active posters currently on FFL who tell lies as a matter of 
course: you, Richard, and Barry. More than anything else that happens here, 
this degrades the quality of the community and the conversation, because it 
fosters distrust and dislike and generates what Buck has been calling 
"unkindness." And lying to denigrate other members is the most unkind of all.
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:47 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   I've never lied about you, Share, and you know it. But you have told 
falsehoods about me, about Ann, about Emily, about Raunchy, about others--even 
about yourself. You know that too. And I've documented many of the falsehoods.
 
Share lied:

 << Judy, I know how you have lied about me. Therefore I don't believe it when 
you say someone else has lied. >>
 

 Despite the evidence. Not surprising you would say this when you yourself have 
refused to admit your own documented falsehoods.
 

 << This will not change. >>
 

 No, I don't imagine it will. You're incapable of functioning any other way 
than by denying reality.
 

 << Also, I don't find Richard to be a troll. >>
 

 Even Barry acknowledges Richard's trolling. He's been known as a troll since 
way back on alt.m.t. As they say, Richard's picture illustrates the 
encyclopedia entry on trolling. IOW, he's the very image of a troll; his 
behavior defines trolling.
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:25 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   Lying and trolling are courageous?? What an interesting set of ethics you 
have.
 
Share fawned:

 << Yep, turq, I think Richard's been pretty courageous these past few weeks. >>








 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] State censorship of radio

[Bhairitu]

In the US broadcasters thought that HD Radio was going to be the cat's 
meow.  However receivers are expensive and until one can pick one for 
$10 it's not going anywhere.  Radio engineers I know hate HD Radio.  
It's basically digital signals so that each station can have additional 
"channels" but the quality isn't that good.


AM radio in the US is on it's death bed.  Big corporations like Clear 
Channel and Cumulus bought up a lot of stations and are losing money on 
them.  People listen to Internet streams instead. On my walks I listen 
to streams on my smart phone rather than AM or even FM radio.  We're 
having a strange mixup after the first of the year in the SF Bay Area.  
Rush and Hannity the right wing talkers are moving from a higher power 
station to a lower power that is currently hosting mostly liberal talk.  
Don't know if all the liberal talkers on the former Green960 are moving 
to the other more powerful station (but not by much).


Personally I love all the big corporations losing their asses on their 
radio and TV stations.  Couldn't happen to a better bunch.


On 12/16/2013 08:28 AM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote:


In the UK there's been a big push to have DAB radio coverage. The BBC 
want the Government to announce a timetable for turning off all 
analogue coverage so that all those old AM/FM radios will become 
worthless. As DAB reception can be hopeless in some areas it's not 
proving a popular move. But the other thing is that DAB means you can 
only listen to approved output. If a station isn't approved for the 
multiplex, our radios won't receive it.


With FM you can get hit lots of pirate broadcasts.

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[emilymaenot]

Ohhh, so you are holding a resentment! Well, at least you are being honest 
about why you don't feel like you should be accountable for *yourself.*  This 
is the way that criminals think Share.  Check yourself, for god's sake.  

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Share Long]

Judy, imo, this is one of the ways you sneakily lie about people, this 
seemingly clever use of verbs like smarmed which imply that you know people's 
inner intentions and then attempt to poison the well with what are merely your 
opinions. 





On Monday, December 16, 2013 11:05 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Share smarmed:


<< Emily, one, Ann has many time expressed disapproval for my apologies; >>

And why was that, Share? What reasons did she give for her disapproval? Were 
they about your having made a sincere apology for something you genuinely did 
wrong?

<< two, I wasn't aware that I caused her to suffer. >>

I don't think she did suffer, actually, despite your best intentions. She'd 
have to have some respect for you before your attacks would cause her any pain.

I would rephrase Emily's suggestion: "Why don't you ask yourself...'how can I 
bring peace to myself so that I'm no longer so mean-spirited, and so that I can 
take responsibility for my own flaws instead of trying to blame them on 
others?'"






On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:43 AM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
  
Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways 
there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her 
"vicious."  Why don't you ask yourself..."what can I do to bring peace and 
alleviate suffering that I have caused?"  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very 
negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time 
denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In 
contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably 
nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and 
compassionate. 





On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
  

>>
>>
>>
>>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>>You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate 
>>people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, 
>>ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else 
>>here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up.
>>
>>Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. 
>>
>>
>>Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, 
>>when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my 
>>mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing 
>>Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind 
>>numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and 
>>"protect" and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She 
>>relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as 
>>idiocy and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave 
>>playing people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of 
>>interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This 
>>started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver 
>>was dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her "frisky fellas" 
>>to describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because
 of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a 
way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you 
to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized 
human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? 
Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. 
Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you 
free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick.
>>
>>
>>On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... wrote:
>>>
>>  
>>>This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) 
>>>takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>>Richard trolled:
>>>
>>>
>>><< It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. 
>>>Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and 
>>>Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him 
>>>because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are 
>>>smarter than she is. 
>>>
>>>Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to
  criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an
  extremist that takes almost everything as a personal
  affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and
  an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me.
  Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all
  that time, I can't think of a single respondent that
  wants anything t

Re: [FairfieldLife] The pharmaceutical industry is beneath contempt

[Bhairitu]

Especially when maybe 60 cents a month worth of kitchen cabinet herbs 
might solve the problem.  My sister has "fibromyalgia".  The ayurvedic 
treatment is for both pitta and vata.  But trying  to get her to try 
anything other than drugs these days is useless.


Because Hulu+ still has ads in some of their streams of TV shows there 
is the one drug spot that lasts 60 seconds and the first 15 is about the 
drug then 30-40 seconds of side effect warnings.  Who the hell would 
want to take that drug?


On 12/16/2013 12:55 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


Now that I'm back in the business of researching, writing, and editing
articles and papers related to health and medicine for a while, here's a
rant just for the pleasure of ranting, and to warn people of what Big
Pharma is really like.

I spoke the other day to a family member who has been suffering for a
while from a form of fibromyalgia that kept him in constant pain. After
trying many medications, he was finally prescribed one called Lyrica. It
seemed to help. But it had nasty side effects, so after a few months he
tried to reduce the dosage so that he could stop taking it altogether.
Voila -- much *worse* side effects.

So he belatedly looked it up, and found innumerable "support groups" for
people who had been prescribed this drug *without having been told
beforehand 1) that it was addictive, and 2) that there is no known way
to safely wean oneself from the drug once one has become addicted*.

At this point, over 9 million people have been prescribed this drug, and
thus become addicts.

Now, do you want the kicker? It's expensive. A year's supply would cost
over $6,000. But to make things "easier" for those poor people needing
relief from their pain, the manufacturer of Lyrica offers a "special
deal." Working in conjunction with health insurers and doctors (all of
whom get a cash kickback for every dose prescribed), they have a program
whereby people who have been newly prescribed this drug can be
reimbursed all but $25 of the cost.

For the first year. Then, of course, they're stuck (seemingly, at this
point, for the rest of their lives) coughing up $6,000 per year to
reduce their pain but experience side effects that include (according to
the manufacturer's own website) dizziness, sleepiness, seizures, dry
mouth, swelling of the hands and feet, blurred vision, weight gain,
trouble concentrating, feeling "high," and risking
life-threatening allergic reactions. Side effects caused by trying to
stop taking the medicine include headaches, nausea, diarrhea, trouble
sleeping, and again, seizures.

And the manufacturer of this drug is benevolently offering it to new
users for 240X less than it would normally cost. Their whole marketing
plan is quite *literally* that of schoolyard drug pushers: "Try it...the
first one's free."

Now think about the income that its manufacturer Pfizer is deriving from
a medication that costs them a few cents to manufacture -- $6,000 per
person X 9,000,000 addicts = 54 billion dollars per year.

Be warned, if any doctor ever tries to prescribe it for you.

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Share Long]

Emily, many times in the past Ann has expressed disapproval of my apologies. 
Therefore, why would I apologize to her?! It doesn't even make sense given her 
attitude about it. Also, I think you are biased about this, ignoring all the 
times Ann has been snarky towards and or about me and focusing on this event 
when I expressed a negative opinion about her. For me, this invalidates what 
you have to say.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:58 AM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Really?  When have you apologized for this?  Of course you weren't "aware."  
This is an internet forum, not a one-on-one, face-to-face conversation.  
Pretend that you posted a picture of yourself in a location that you loved 
(intended as humorous and personal input) and I (yes, we know I can get kind of 
down and dirty) went in and in a demeaning fashion, belittled the face that God 
gave you.  You can't even imagine what that would feel like, is that what you 
are saying?  

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[authfriend]

Share smarmed:
 
 << Emily, one, Ann has many time expressed disapproval for my apologies; >>
 

 And why was that, Share? What reasons did she give for her disapproval? Were 
they about your having made a sincere apology for something you genuinely did 
wrong?
 

 << two, I wasn't aware that I caused her to suffer. >>
 

 I don't think she did suffer, actually, despite your best intentions. She'd 
have to have some respect for you before your attacks would cause her any pain.
 

 I would rephrase Emily's suggestion: "Why don't you ask yourself...'how can I 
bring peace to myself so that I'm no longer so mean-spirited, and so that I can 
take responsibility for my own flaws instead of trying to blame them on 
others?'"
 
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:43 AM, "emilymaenot@..."  
wrote:
 
   Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited 
ways there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her 
"vicious."  Why don't you ask yourself..."what can I do to bring peace and 
alleviate suffering that I have caused?"  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very 
negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time 
denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In 
contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably 
nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and 
compassionate. 
 

 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate 
people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, 
ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else 
here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up.
 
 Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. 
 

 Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, 
when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my 
mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing 
Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind 
numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and 
"protect" and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She 
relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy 
and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing 
people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of 
interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This 
started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was 
dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her "frisky fellas" to 
describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am 
backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could 
possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a 
way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a 
husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or 
maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you 
don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to 
act and post like a stupendous dick.
 
 On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) 
takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
 
 
 Richard trolled:
 
 << It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. 
Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj 
to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he 
is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she 
is. 
 
 Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she 
owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal 
affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, 
which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In 
all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do 
with her - not one. That's what I think. >>
 
 On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been 
dozens. So I'm really curious.  Especially since you had not been involved in 
the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and 
will have wonderful holidays.
 
 
 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, "anartaxius@..." mailto:anartaxius@... 
 mailto:anartaxius@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I'm going

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richard Enigma

[Share Long]

Judy, I disagree with your assessment of me and my posts and with your 
assessment of others whom you have called liar. You have used that word too 
much and in such circumstances and, more importantly, for such purposes that 
you actually often create a barrier to finding truth rather than an aid.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:47 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
I've never lied about you, Share, and you know it. But you have told falsehoods 
about me, about Ann, about Emily, about Raunchy, about others--even about 
yourself. You know that too. And I've documented many of the falsehoods.

Share lied:


<< Judy, I know how you have lied about me. Therefore I don't believe it when 
you say someone else has lied. >>

Despite the evidence. Not surprising you would say this when you yourself have 
refused to admit your own documented falsehoods.

<< This will not change. >>

No, I don't imagine it will. You're incapable of functioning any other way than 
by denying reality.

<< Also, I don't find Richard to be a troll. >>

Even Barry acknowledges Richard's trolling. He's been known as a troll since 
way back on alt.m.t. As they say, Richard's picture illustrates the 
encyclopedia entry on trolling. IOW, he's the very image of a troll; his 
behavior defines trolling.





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:25 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
  
Lying and trolling are courageous?? What an interesting set of ethics you have.

Share fawned:


<< Yep, turq, I think Richard's been pretty courageous these past few weeks. >>

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[emilymaenot]

Really?  When have you apologized for this?  Of course you weren't "aware."  
This is an internet forum, not a one-on-one, face-to-face conversation.  
Pretend that you posted a picture of yourself in a location that you loved 
(intended as humorous and personal input) and I (yes, we know I can get kind of 
down and dirty) went in and in a demeaning fashion, belittled the face that God 
gave you.  You can't even imagine what that would feel like, is that what you 
are saying?  

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[Share Long]

Emily, one, Ann has many time expressed disapproval for my apologies; two, I 
wasn't aware that I caused her to suffer. 





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:43 AM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com" 
 wrote:
 
  
Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways 
there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her 
"vicious."  Why don't you ask yourself..."what can I do to bring peace and 
alleviate suffering that I have caused?"  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very 
negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time 
denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In 
contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably 
nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and 
compassionate. 





On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
  

>
>
>
>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate 
>people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, 
>ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else 
>here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up.
>
>Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. 
>
>
>Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, 
>when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my 
>mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing 
>Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind 
>numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and 
>"protect" and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She 
>relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy 
>and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing 
>people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of 
>interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This 
>started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was 
>dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her "frisky fellas" to 
>describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because
 of that I am backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a 
way that could possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you 
to behave in a way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized 
human being or a husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? 
Take a minute or maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. 
Just because you don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you 
free licence to act and post like a stupendous dick.
>
>
>On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... wrote:
>>
>  
>>This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) 
>>takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
>>
>>
>>Richard trolled:
>>
>>
>><< It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. 
>>Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and 
>>Vaj to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him 
>>because he is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are 
>>smarter than she is. 
>>
>>Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to
  criticism. She thinks she owns this forum. She is an
  extremist that takes almost everything as a personal
  affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and
  an ankle-biting mean dog, which seem pretty apt to me.
  Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In all
  that time, I can't think of a single respondent that
  wants anything to do with her - not one. That's what I
  think. >>
>>
>>
>>On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote:
>>>
>>  
>>>Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been 
>>>dozens. So I'm really curious.  Especially since you had not been involved 
>>>in the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling 
>>>snow and will have wonderful holidays.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, "anartaxius@..."  
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>>  
>>>Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The 
>>>remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out.
>>>
>>>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richard Enigma

[authfriend]

I've never lied about you, Share, and you know it. But you have told falsehoods 
about me, about Ann, about Emily, about Raunchy, about others--even about 
yourself. You know that too. And I've documented many of the falsehoods.
 
Share lied:

 << Judy, I know how you have lied about me. Therefore I don't believe it when 
you say someone else has lied. >>
 

 Despite the evidence. Not surprising you would say this when you yourself have 
refused to admit your own documented falsehoods.
 

 << This will not change. >>
 

 No, I don't imagine it will. You're incapable of functioning any other way 
than by denying reality.
 

 << Also, I don't find Richard to be a troll. >>
 

 Even Barry acknowledges Richard's trolling. He's been known as a troll since 
way back on alt.m.t. As they say, Richard's picture illustrates the 
encyclopedia entry on trolling. IOW, he's the very image of a troll; his 
behavior defines trolling.
 

 
 
 On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:25 AM, "authfriend@..."  wrote:
 
   Lying and trolling are courageous?? What an interesting set of ethics you 
have.
 
Share fawned:

 << Yep, turq, I think Richard's been pretty courageous these past few weeks. >>








 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Professor Post

[emilymaenot]

Dear Share, remember, *you* attacked Ann in one of the most mean-spirited ways 
there is, and then never bothered to apologize and in fact, called her 
"vicious."  Why don't you ask yourself..."what can I do to bring peace and 
alleviate suffering that I have caused?"  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Ann, it's true you no longer engage with me. But you do continue to make very 
negative remarks about me, focusing on mistakes I've made and at the same time 
denigrating or ignoring what has been positive about my participation here. In 
contrast, I liked it when Richard said that you and Emily and Judy are probably 
nice people in person. To me, his attitude seems reasonable and balanced and 
compassionate. 
 

 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:57 PM, "awoelflebater@..."  
wrote:
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 You are incorrect - you just make up stuff so people will shun me. You hate 
people from Texas - you are a hater, an abuser, and a mean, perpetual, petty, 
ankle-biting junkyard dog - that's what I think, and I don't see anyone else 
here that disagrees. If they do, they should speak up.
 
 Where I come from, silence usually indicates agreement. 
 

 Ricky, silence can also mean disbelief at what one is witnessing. But for me, 
when I see abuse or just plain ignorance I don't tend to stay quiet with my 
mouth hanging open. You need to get a grip. The very thing you are accusing 
Judy of is what you are displaying. The fact that you are such a blind 
numbskull about Share is quite another matter. You and Feste go ahead and 
"protect" and defend her all you want, I don't care one way or another. She 
relies on twits like you to fall for her feigned helplessness masked as idiocy 
and her little girl make-believe persona. She will go to her grave playing 
people like you but I couldn't care less; her acts and her manner of 
interaction here makes me seriously question her psychiatric health. (This 
started to become apparent when she so insensitively proclaimed LB Shriver was 
dying of liver cancer and then her PR claim on top of her "frisky fellas" to 
describe murdering, butchering rapists in India). So, because of that I am 
backing down from ever trying to really interact with her in a way that could 
possibly be meaningful. But your attacks on Judy are causing you to behave in a 
way which does not serve you well as either a man, a civilized human being or a 
husband and father. Do you live and speak like this offline? Take a minute or 
maybe two and really look at what you are putting out here. Just because you 
don't have a janitorial job to lose anymore doesn't give you free licence to 
act and post like a stupendous dick.
 
 On 12/15/2013 7:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here (except Xeno) 
takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
 
 
 Richard trolled:
 
 << It's very simple, Share - Judy hates Xeno and she wants him to shut up. 
Just like she wants you to shut up; just like she wanted Curtis, Barry, and Vaj 
to shut up. She won't dialog with Xeno because she is afraid of him because he 
is smarter that she is, just like Curtis, Barry, and Vaj are smarter than she 
is. 
 
 Judy has a very big ego and does NOT respond well to criticism. She thinks she 
owns this forum. She is an extremist that takes almost everything as a personal 
affront. She has been compared to a junkyard dog and an ankle-biting mean dog, 
which seem pretty apt to me. Her rap sheet goes back all the way to 1994! In 
all that time, I can't think of a single respondent that wants anything to do 
with her - not one. That's what I think. >>
 
 On 12/15/2013 3:53 PM, Share Long wrote:
 
   Xeno, Doc brought up Xeno Caveat and Judy said there had already been 
dozens. So I'm really curious.  Especially since you had not been involved in 
the Professor Post thread! Anyway, hope you had a little fun shoveling snow and 
will have wonderful holidays.
 
 
 
 
 On Sunday, December 15, 2013 2:43 PM, "anartaxius@..." mailto:anartaxius@... 
 mailto:anartaxius@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I'm going out to shovel snow. You need to do some research Share. The 
remainder of you can remain and shovel whatever Judy is dishing out.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 Anyone, what the heck is a Xeno Caveat?!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 






 
 
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Richard Enigma

[Share Long]

Goosebumps, turq, thanks, a melody so beautiful that even the violin sounded 
good! And the words: roads and roads; depends on the way that you see. 





On Monday, December 16, 2013 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB  wrote:
 
  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Yep, turq, I think Richard's been pretty courageous these past few weeks. 
> Thanks again to him and feste and you. BTW, here's another song I'd like 
> played at my memorial service. But don't worry about remembering. It's all 
> spelled out in my will (-:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5TwT69i1lU
> 
> PS Consider song an early you know what present!

Uh, thanks, I guess. There's only one song that I want played at my memorial 
service, if there is one. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6j1SIUGRxRM 

> On Monday, December 16, 2013 9:33 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
> 
> Because I've actually been enjoying seeing Judy The Stalker get a little 
> taste of her own medicine in the form of one guy doing to her what she's done 
> to others for nearly twenty years, I thought I'd throw the guy a bone and 
> write a little something positive about Richard Williams. Go figure. 
> 
> The guy's a mystery, that's for sure. He'll make post after post of bullshit 
> and trollery, and then throw something personal and almost interesting into 
> the mix. I downright like some of his raps about music. 
> 
> And lately I have come to appreciate some of his interactions with Share. I 
> think that the conversations have done both of them a world of good.
> 
> I still have reservations about his overfondness for prairie dogs, but most 
> of my friends have a kink or two. :-) 
> 
> That's never stood in the way of
>  appreciating their good qualities, so I don't see why it should with Richard.
>