Re: FLUXLIST: a crappy idea

2000-02-08 Thread Terrence J Kosick



Terrence writes;
not a bad idea to listen in. please post the list.
thanks
T.
tark wrote:
ok, many
of you may think that this is a useless post, so if you don't wanna be
bothered be it, delete this.ok-i
found this mailing list online, about austrian culture, particularly german
influences in it. Maybe we should start forwarding our letters to this
list- it has 280 members, but if like 5 of us joined and the list got 5
copies of each fluxlist post maybe... i don't know... i'm sure this has
completely ruined any reputation i might've had...just
an ideatark





Re: FLUXLIST: Re: fluxus in canada

2000-02-27 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Thanks for (Geoff Hendricks) full name and links, Allen and Pauline (Oliveros).

The performance I saw was 13 years ago?! Funny it was like I saw it yesterday.
I think your post stired my memories of that performance and his telling me
about Fluxus.

Incidentally Hank Bull of the Western Front was on CBC Television tonight on a
program about Chinese Contemporary art here in Vancouver. In speaking of
Culture in Canada. Hank said if Montreal is the gateway to Europe; Vancouver
was the gateway to the Americas and the Orient. Calling Vancouver Lotus land.

Indeed Vancouver has a huge Asian presence and the asian contemporary art is
always being featured here. The program was a a sequay to the Asian Modern art
gallery that has just opened here. The only one of it's kind in North America.
Vancouver's Can/European and Can/Chinese have been influenced by Asian art for
some time. http://www.artbeatus.com/ shows strictly Modern Asian arts. They did
however have a major show of many works by Jean-Michel Basquiat in 97.

" The mission of the gallery is to
 promote modern Chinese art and at the same time to encourage dialogue between
 contemporary art of the east and the west. "The circumstances surrounding
 Basquiat's work are similar to those of many contemporary Chinese artists,"
says
 gallery director Sheng Tian Zheng. "His work was initially considered outside
the
 mainstream as it actively challenged an established art world to seek
acceptance
 from the general public."


I think the director's reading of Basquiat suspiciously leaves out his very
knowing careerism. I have some reservations of contemorary art that is too
contemporary or to be fair too fluxus. I mean we have to take a look around
ourselves and just act on whatever it is we must act on. I think the art of
cultural identity, sexual orientation, politics etc. will last for some time.
Its heyday is still with us. I being of Polish and some Austrian heritage
haven't really considered my family's background in terms of art/nature except
for some installation and photo text of geopolitics. Artists giving way to
naturalism rather then falling back on old formulas it the key to culture
renewed and not culture revived.

Maybe thats why Geoff Hendick's performance stuck in my brain. It just seemed
so damn amazing and fresh.

Terrence Kosick
artnatural get fresh!




allen bukoff wrote:

 Does anyone know of him? He was from NewYork. A tall long haired
 bearded fellow around 40+ at that time. He did cloud paintings as well if
 that
 helps.

 Geoff Hendricks continues to be a very active artist.  He resides in New
 York City and Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, Canada, and teaches at
 Rutgers University. His brother, Jon Hendricks, is the author of "Fluxus
 Codex."

 You can find a couple of internet links for Geoff Hendricks at
 http://www.fluxus.org/classic/hendricks.html .
 You can find relatively recent photos of him (no longer wearing long hair or
 a beard) at http://www.fluxus.org/higgins/pic03.htm ,
 http://www.nutscape.com/fluxus/emily-harvey-gallery/rehearse.htm , and
 http://www.fluxus.org/matches/ .



Re: FLUXLIST: Re: fluxus in canada

2000-02-27 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Apparently they are two of the most productive stores in the western
region.

The first Vancouver Starbucks then called Il Giornali, One at that
location and the other at the Waterfront Seabus Station. The second
Robson and Thurow was added a few years later in a newly built very post
modern style building. (the other kitty corner is housed in an older
brick construction)  They decided to go with a black and white logo at
that newer location. Don't ask me why they did that but that might be
something to further your theory.

Maybe primate and I should do a performance drinking coffee wearing
t-shirts with logos that say "STARBUCKS PEOPLE" instead of "Starbucks
Coffee" and waving to each other from one Starbucks to the other every
day for a week till the local news picks it up or untill we get 'mugged'
by too much Starbucks coffee.

I will start by designing the new STARBUCKS PEOPLE logo. Who knows maybe
we will get free coffee to stand there.

T.
artnatural



Rod Stasick wrote:

 I wonder if Fluxus was in mind when they built
 TWO Starbucks on the corner of Robson 
 Thurlow...

 --- primate _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Wow a fluxlist member other than I in
  Vancouver!

 =
 http://rostasi.8m.com

 http://www.forcedexposure.com/artists/hunt.jerry.html

 Utilizing the blades of technology on the facial hair of imagination



Re: FLUXLIST: Re: fluxus in canada

2000-02-27 Thread Terrence J Kosick


Terrence writes;
sure!
Give me a week or two to get the T-shirts together.
T.
Rod Stasick wrote:
Could each one of you take a photo, across the
street, of the other one thru each one's window?
Rod





Re: FLUXLIST: Re: fluxus in canada

2000-02-27 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

The problem is propriatory and that we need permission. The exercise would have
to be along the lines of professional quality broadcast quality to get them to
agree. Just taking a picture of each other from inside the store or at an
exterior store can be an issue. I like the gorilla tactic better.

Have you tried Starbucks light blends? Their Infusion and Taso teas are great
as well. *l*

T.



primate _ wrote:

 What about we tape the prepairation of the coffee and the drinking of
 itintreviews with ppl and the ritual of 'community' that starbucks
 brings...stir stir stircream2 packets of sugarwe could also kepp
 track of what we ordered and see if there is a way you can make other ppl
 drink the same without saying anything to them...

 nick



Re: FLUXLIST: Still Snowing Still Dreaming (a snowman I should turn to be)

2000-03-02 Thread Terrence J Kosick



Roger Stevens wrote:

 what's going to happen to all that other snow

 will it just melt away

 or will some archivist with a fridge preserve it?



Terrence writes;

I do not know thee, but this is brilliant! *l*

T.



FLUXLIST: http://www.thehungersite.com/

2000-03-10 Thread Terrence J Kosick

http://www.thehungersite.com/

Terrence writes;

Good day all. If you have a moment please visit the nonprofit hunger
site by John Breen. There is a map of the world that indicates, by
dimming, a place in the world where someone dies of hunger. Up to 24,000
people, mostly childeren every day! There is a button, (suppored by
Corporate sponsors banner ads and links), that you click that will feed
a hungry person somewhere in the world.

The money is sent to the United Nations World Food Program

Please help. Visit there everyday and click to feed!

Thanks.

terrence kosick
artnatural clicks





Re: FLUXLIST: Why?

2000-03-24 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

On of my most memorable art school classes/teachers at the U of British Columbia was 
Roy Kyookas's 3 yr.  class on studio art communication. It was a 6 unit class. We were 
to meet once a week. Everyone showed up the first day except Roy. That was it. We 
later were told by the shop technician that Roy would lead the rest
of the teachers to review our studio work. That happened at the end of the year at our 
3rd year show. The shop technician told me that roy selected one of my paintings (a 
realist still-life of personal objects in one of the wooden packing crates I used in 
my constant apartment jumping as a student)  as the best work he
has ever see a student do. It pissed off the other teachers because it was not 
painterly and I was told by a student who dropped out the year before that the 
unwritten rule was no realism. I was doing expressionism and symbolism but did still 
life's at home on the sly. I hod about 70 paintings when I graduated. I left
half of them there in the studio. The following year students got to see Roy leave the 
class and come back after smoking a joint. He asked the students to start talking. 
They apparently ended up spending much time on french theory. That was 86.

Serge Guilbaute's class on modern art was better. He was pissed off that there was 
more than 12 students in his class and insisted that one of us leave the first day. It 
was very tense and silent in the room. I was really pissed off about that and used to 
come in befor class after that and smoke a cigar.  He was really
demanding and wanted original material about certain critical periods of contemporary 
art history. Some suspected it was material he was looking over for a book to follow 
his How NY Stole Modern Art. He asked us about our impressions of his book and we 
discussed mostly american abstract expressionism. I still browse the
art books and "find" artists whose work interests me. Flux dada etc. was never taught 
me. All to fill in the big gaps.

One visiting painting professor from the local art school came out to see our work. He 
stood before a large very symbolic painting of a fire breathing monster clutching a 
group of screaming people) that hung in the studios. The painting Prof. pointed at it 
and called it barbarism and left the studio.(I painted in the
studio's one summer and I used it at an anti-cruse missle rally as a backdrop for the 
speakers. It ended up on the front page of the news paper with the mayor in profile. 
'84). The other student's pretended not to notice it when I was there. It began to 
bother me and I entered and got it into a local major art show. I
was old to submit to a gallery but was rejected due to a few female nudes in my 
portfolio. They were caricature meant to make fun of pinups. It was not funny to them. 
I received no connections from my professors to launch my career and they try not 
recognize me but I always drop the remark that I still paint and am into
the computer and email. I consider every little thing or gesture a artistic 
possibility. My sweet revenge.


I am told the non degree Art school, Emily Carr now has mandatory art history. I do 
know that certain gender taboos exist now at that art school, like it is unkool for a 
guy to do a nude study of a woman. Some students were calling a few well to do 
housewives breeders and many kids work hard at styling their wardrobes
and are very hip on the latest hot young artists. They do have more opportunities to 
meet visiting successful artists and are much more enthusiastic. I am told they are 
switching a more technical aproch so the studen't don't end up waiting on tables or 
painting houses (like i do) to get by as artists.

I think it is nuts not to have comprehensive art history studies even though 
university departments do specialize one needs to know what the others are doing or 
have done. I think my art school years were a waist land but at least I was creative 
and self reflexive on my rudderless education.


I think we all need to give art history fluxus talks at local artschools and community 
centers. Dropping hints on new initiatives would be fun to do.

How about coming up with some material/ ideas for that here
At least printing a few flyers with url's and posting them on student bullitin boards 
can be done. I am definitly for that kind of gorilla info drop.

terrence kosick
artnatural

Rod Stasick wrote:

 --- Sol Nte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Don, the majority of art teachers that I have met are fairly poorly
  educated
  in the arts (or at least anything beyond the mainstream). It's very
  disappointing...

 It seems that's the case for the educational system in general...

  Certainly there have been occasions when I have been
  pleased
  to talk to an art lecturer to ask them how they present certain
  material to
  students only to find they've never heard of it and start asking me
  questions. I'm just a computer programmer without 1 art qualification

Re: FLUXLIST: RTMark/Whitney

2000-03-24 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I think it is about being recognized for their work in a traditional
institution. There is also the issue of being ligitimized? I think they (®™ark
) don't care about that too much. I belive they are mostly into getting higher
profile for their agitprop. Seems ok to me. They make some good points.
Undermining the Idea of getting into the Whitney is funny and they managed to
raise funds for their projects. That's cool.

I agree the webart could remain as it is but think it also a matter of the
webartists "connecting" to the funding that traditional galleries provide. Lets
be fair all should get some chance. They are a new media and there is an
cultural education element to consider when they showcase this new work at
their 'institutional server'.

I don't think they are competing for exhibition space as much as painter's and
installation artists who's larger works can 'suck' wall and storage space.

As a matter of archiving I like the idea that digital art can be erased so
easily. It is a cool clean way to recycle art. This is sacrilige in web art
circles but as a e-mail performace artist what can I (not) say?

Maybe some art is too easy to ignore. I think web art as a kiosk would cause
kids at the video play space to protest an get them confused or angery if they
were in a gallery and there was no curves or deaths to score.

I can see webart as interactive projections in a large space as well someday.



off topic;

Has anyone done Odor art? I am working on some new work that I call Scent's of
Art for the home or gallery. It takes no space at all! Scent rings lightbulbs
and secret art oils. Smell the difference!


http://www.thehungersite.com/

terrence kosick
artnatural takes a deep breath

Sol Nte wrote:

 Thanks Carol for posting this.

 I have to say that I don't really understand the point of displaying
 websites on computers in galleries. Yes I think there should be public
 access machines for people to generally browse the web as well as to view
 art sites but when you start putting computers in galleries to do it it
 seems like a waste of the physical space. Artists have enough of a job
 trying to get gallery space to show traditional physical works without
 wasting that space to position a computer just like the one people could use
 in libraries, cybercafes, their own homes in fact anywhere else to view
 exactly the same content. There is altogether too little space available to
 display physical artworks to waste it with computers. The web offers an
 alternative way to display artwork outside of the gallery system, in many
 ways its power is  very similar to mail art's negation of the role of the
 gallery in presenting art surely these people at the Whitney realise that.
 Maybe they just want to make sure they don't get accused of ignoring new
 media, who knows?

 Also it seems to me that RTMark has done nothing with this other than be
 controversial for its own sake. Why didn't they just exhibit a link to the
 hunger site or something like that. To me it says a lot that only 20 pages
 have been sent in to be displayed via RTMark...that's quite a lack of
 interest! Maybe more people will send stuff but ultimately the whole thing
 seems a fairly pointless exercise compared to the somewhat better things
 that RTMark has done in the past.

 cheers,

 Sol.




Re: FLUXLIST: Re: Why?

2000-03-25 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

This is a good point Heiko. The goodness of the roots of reality and depth of
meaning always seems to get boiled out by the constant attendance. Why does
everything end up like clichés?  If anyone read my earlier post of the
reminiscences of art school one could easily surmise it is laziness and
convince; "oh yes, This and that has happened so on we go.."  It runs though
everything about cultural dominance. Has consumer society rendered all our
actions to the convince of canned culture?  Token acceptance of simple
definition is hardly a reward to the lifetimes of work performed by numerous
artists who's feelings ran deeper then the next paycheck and did not enter
the popularity contest. Art movements like stones polished by the river of
time appear only like curious gems easily held aloft in the manicured hands
of the clergy. Not at all like a few building blocks they should be. The
gestures of celebrated acceptance does not paint the true picture of cultural
history. Many hands and hearts build cities upon cities.

terrence kosick
artnatural

www.thehungersite.com/



Heiko Recktenwald wrote:

  finally read Hugo Ball's Flight Out of Time: A Dada Diary.  I was
  surprised at the depth of sadness directly involved in the movement over

 I allways think to old style living rooms, from the time before WWi,
 compared to what Bauhaus etc did. It wasnt changing furnitures alone.

 Greetings, H.




Re: FLUXLIST: 1) C'mon, Heiko. 2) Footnote to Davidson G.

2000-03-26 Thread Terrence J Kosick




Ken Friedman wrote:

In this, George Maciunas and Charlotte Moorman were both pioneers,
colleagues and heroes. And if George was occasionally cranky, look
at it
this way: if you worked full time much of your life to support the
vast
range of publications, festivals, etc., that George supported with
the
earnings from his day job ands free-lance work, you'd occasionally
be
cranky, too.


Terrence writes;
Realistically there are few people in the world who would do anything
without getting paid. Artists whose work fits the status quo or fits well
with agendas that help to sustain the galleries and institutions perhaps
labor in their service while their creative engagements are made easier.
lucky them. It is as if one is going for a welfare handout when trying
for grants. I think it is a necessary cultural business grant. Artists
labour for free while the culture eventually benifites and holds the one's
who struggled the most in high esteem long after any benefit of formal
engagement could have made societal change or enrichment; after the fact
of the scene.
Wind in your sails or strenuously rowing the journey is rewarding. It
is important to recognize valiant efforts who accomplish their aims despite
difficulties that can make them curse the tide. Especially when their labours
benifite others selflessly. Is that the cultural resistance struggling
in the trenches? Vive l'artnatural!
terrence kosick
artnatural



Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts

2000-04-02 Thread Terrence J Kosick



Heiko Recktenwald wrote:

  There's also talk about the virtual as well as real elimination of
  the jewel box -- this new "simplicity" crossed with a technologically

 Do you want this ? Elimination of LP covers etc, THINGS, I liked them.

Terrence writes;


Simplyfy your life with 'highend' things.

Real Simple mag;

http://www.realsimple.com/realsimple/

t.






Re: FLUXLIST: Sensitive Issues

2000-04-02 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I find it sad how many artits are taught to be so critical. They seem to create
under such burdons and with theortical restraints. I am anti bordom.

Everyone born a child. I can see more clearly what is ahead as I respond to
what is before me not behind. Why relive what is done?  Art is techne. Humans
are tool makers, use them. Just play. Be observant. Poke fun my mon.

terrence kosick
artnatural

George Free wrote:

 What did Buren say ? In relation to Duchamp.
 

 from an interview:

 B.M. According to you Duchamp's path leads to a cul-de-sac. In a way he
 wanted to be the last artist. Is this what you criticize?

 D.B. In its time this position was interesting. But subsequently, Duchamp's
 radical criticism of art has becomes the opposite of what Duchamp himself
 criticized. Duchamp was able to decontextualize an ordinary object -- thanks
 to the gallery, where the context contradicts the object -- but the context
 itself was not thought about in any critical way. It didn't take long for
 the effect; the banal object is fetishized. The context and place exerted
 their influence. The object placed there to destabilize painting became like
 a painting, a work of art with the rest. And, in this case, obsolete.
 Duchamp thereby introduced a form of production which is no more, and no
 less, than the mirror image of what he criticized. For the last twenty years
 I have been against Duchamp in my work, I never took an 'anti-art' position,
 even if some people would have loved to find this so. One of the fundamental
 and serious questions I ask myself is: "What is art?" Of, if you will, what
 are the processes which operate so that a work becomes -- or does not
 become -- a work of art? And if one finds these rules, or, if not, how do
 they fluctuate? And under what pressures? Duchamp gave a deliberately
 comfortable answer to these questions. For myself, they are still unresolved
 even if a solution appears from time to time in my work.




Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts

2000-04-03 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

It is interesting for all to note. Interactive Multimedia CD roms continue
to be more popular in France (and Europe I imagine). They are in pocket
book sized packages and lined up like books with great selection and
variety that you have to carefully browse. Wereas in North America
packaging tends to be cereal box sized and also competing for shelf space
with popular brands with lots of sweet things and gimmicky surprises.

I have a garden size garbage bag filled with software boxes. I have been
thinking of collage or sculptural possibilities in order to recycle them.
Perhaps I should transfer my cereals to them for decanting. Hmm maybe not.

terrence kosick
artnatural




Kathy Forer wrote:

 Do you want this ? Elimination of LP covers etc, THINGS, I liked them.

 No. Heck no. Then elimination of bodies and other essential parts,
 disposable to this great new networked organism -- organism vs.
 artifact, and artifact's down 2 in this round.

 Food is mostly organic but it's a thing.

 Art is a thing, more and/or less, with it's essence highly in question.
 This network is an organism, running on things which we're trying to
 make smaller and less thing-like, transparent.

 "Jewel boxes" are okay. I really prefer record covers, never really
 spend the same quality time with the teeny tiny type on the cd box
 inserts.

 No conclusions, I don't mean to posit 20 questions, but it's later
 than I think.




Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts--icons

2000-04-04 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

One senior artist told me once, "artists can't be (ethically)
environmentalists".
I didn't agree but i saw his point. It did not stop me from producing art
about my environmental anti consumer concerns. I still make use of my utility
of pleasure but there is pleasure in the tools such as the one i use to send
this message. letters on paper would not work as a replacement for this
thread.
less paper less packaging less impact on the environment. What is sacred? What
will be the legacy of communication threads?

A friend of mine has large cd collection. One of the cd's has a blinking light
on it. It stands out. The thin spines of cds are barely legible but more brow
sable then records. However records are more tactile as you leave through
them. Their covers read like pop icon history. Their worn texture's look like
(russian)icons. I get a certain melancholy looking at them. My older brother's
and sisters youthful dreams are caught up in their aged almost sacred
appearance. Can cds have this appearance someday?

T.
artnatural

Ann Klefstad wrote:

  Terrence writes;
 
 
  Simplyfy your life with 'highend' things.
 
  Real Simple mag;

 Heiko, I too like the visuals w/ the music, the album covers, etc. Some of
 the most indelible images from my childhood were images from album covers.

 Terrence:
 Real Simple mag is run by an editor who is childless, married to a cardiac
 surgeon, has a 4-story townhouse in Greenwich Village, and whose
 relationship to simplicity is purely voluntary. This seems perverse; why
 does it seem so? I mean, she's well-meaning, she probably consumes less
 than some, her advice in the first issue isn't bad, though spectacularly
 unnecessary--Why is the whole project so rage-inducing? Because I'm enraged
 by it too, and don't quite understand why. I thought perhaps my automatic
 eat-the-rich responses were in my past, but maybe that's the reason--

 AK




Re: FLUXLIST: Calling All MiniDiscs!

2000-04-05 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

sure;

artnatural
103-980 west 22nd Ave
Vancouver B.C. V5Z-2A1

Player/ recorder, have a good mike as well.


T.



Lord Hasenpfeffer wrote:

 I have an idea.
 If you have a MiniDisc player let me know.
 What's your snail-mailing address?

 Myke




Re: FLUXLIST: hide

2000-04-17 Thread Terrence J Kosick




 terrence hides

























































































hi


















































de





Re: FLUXLIST: hide in fridge

2000-04-19 Thread Terrence J Kosick


Terrence writes;
Now how to rid those fridge odors?!
T.
Patricia wrote:
I found Dave - he was in the fridge!!!
http://www.migros.ch/index2.php3?lang=dlangchange=position=sublink_key=
At 05:04 PM 04/19/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Hola Dave Baptiste!
>
>Didn't know you were here. Welcome! Welcome!
>
>RA
>
>David Baptiste Chirot wrote:
>
>> i hide in my skin
>>
>>
pokerfaced
>>
>>
you
>>
>>
will never find
>>
>>
me
>>
>> dave baptiste chirot
>> 2515 n. oakland #1o6
>> milwaukee, wi 53211
>
>



Re: FLUXLIST: Thin Pop, Thick Pop, Thoughtful Pop

2000-04-20 Thread Terrence J Kosick



Ken Friedman wrote:



 Fluxus had its problems, too. One of greatest Fluxus virtues was also its
 worst problem: a rigorous, almost scientific program of inventing ways to
 approach art. These explorations were part of a broad intellectual project
 on which many contemporary art movements and manifestations could borrow.
 Given the problems associated with Fluxus, others borrowed Fluxus
 innovations and projects, adapting them to many purposes while failing to
 acknowledge Fluxus as the source.

 Fluxus artists had a second problem. In terms of the art market, ---

 Fluxus people also
 walked away from much of the credit that might have been theirs. The
 experimental sensibility of Fluxus people was so strong that these artists
 often lost interest in their own, earlier ideas and moved on.

 One often hears of artists whose work has arrived before its time. This is
 true enough in the art market. There is a worse problem yet. Nothing is
 less forgivable to the powers that move the art market than artists who
 fail to repeat their work to feed a market that demands art work after its
 time has come.

 Oddly enough, these are the Fluxus artists who have had the most profound
 impact on the art world, but even the more conservative, art-minded Fluxus
 artists crossed the boundaries of art forms, moving with ease between
 tactile, musical, theatrical, visual and literary forms.



Terrence writes;

Excellent info/ insite post! Thanks.

Fluxus, I think, holds the key to taking formalized art out of the meuseum and
actualizing by culturizizing their forms into PUBLIC ritual. Hatch that egg!

terrence kosick
artnatural buc buc!  (have a nice easter/ passover)




Re: FLUXLIST: Fridge Over Troubled Water--Stories and sonics.

2000-04-25 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I often have conversations make casual comments about sounds to the point
where it's "oh look at that" = "oh listen to that". Also to tapping on
things. Which ia a little more eccentric but rewarding. People seem to
appreciate these ecentricvities and equate it to having a rare appreciation
of the world. I also belive our moods are very much governed by the levels
and kinds of sounds around us when we don't even relize it. Maybe that's what
people realize too late that it was the sound of their partners voice or the
street they live on has driven them crazy. Or that it was the soothing voice
that motivated them or made them dream of good things. We all naturally
apreciate the voice of a good singer so why not the good sounds of other
things?

When you think of it sounds have more force then we relise. The din of sound
is more of a force than the din of images. Sounds always makes people curious
as to their identity. A funny sound, an unusual sound, where is that sound
coming from? What's making that noise?


T.



Lord Hasenpfeffer wrote:


 My stereo mic just arrived last week.  It has a very long wire which
 splits in the middle and extends even further down to two separate mics
 at the ends.  Each mic has its own little clothespin shaped clip attached
 to it.  In the very near future I intend to clip them both onto my shoes
 and go walking about the main mall in downtown Tulsa during a lunch hour.
 There is also a lot of construction going on there where a new building is
 being erected.  I'm also beginning to wonder what it sounds like down near
 the pedals while I'm driving in my car.

 Myke




Re: FLUXLIST: Here's another vote for greater care with the reply function

2000-04-26 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;


Warning! Slightly off topic.

You know maybe that's why some people risk being assholes is exactly because it
makes life more interesting. The question is does one have to a be a relevant
or irrelevant asshole to make life more interesting or to prove a point or to
respectfully change the subject? I belive one has to keep smiling to make their
act of assholishness to make the best of it. Absolutely no offence intended to
you dd. I just had to have some interesting fun with this. To be selfless and
silly I hope that makes me a smiling irrelevant asshole at least! =-)

T.



ddyment wrote:

 hello,

 here here to richard's a thru c suggestions. i am in total agreement with he
 and ken re:reply function. at the risk
 of sounding like a complete asshole i'll go a step further and ask why one
 feels the need to reply five times in a row - single lines each. there's
 something to be said about a fully formed thought. i've stopped reading most
 of the messages at this point. too much junk to sift thru.

  i realize that fluxlist is not just a research tool and is a 'way of life'
 but so are chat rooms. and not a very interesting way of life.

 dd

 ps. ironically, the record collecting discussions that were pushed out of
 the list for not being relevant (!) were of actual interest to me.




Re: FLUXLIST: forward: talking vaginas

2000-04-27 Thread Terrence J Kosick



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That's probably Rudy's idea of how to give a woman an orgasm . . .


Terrence writes;

*lmao*

T,





Re: FLUXLIST: Does Anyone Know???

2000-04-27 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Never judge a book by its cover.

T.

Rod Stasick wrote:

 sounds intriguing, but i don't know - it sounds
 like my copy of "an endless adventure...an
 endless passion...an endless banquet - a
 situationist scrapbook" that's right now ruining
 the book it's sitting next to on the shelf.

 rod




Re: FLUXLIST: Does Anyone Know???

2000-04-28 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

If books could talk what would they say to each other?
Thinking about that makes me wonder just how careful you have to be when shelving.

I moved recently and built 3x 8'long 2 level shelves. I shift and sort and find I am 
reviewing my books and discovering
which are read or unread much read and needs to be re-read. Placement is everything as 
well. usually by subject but the
locations are also based on frequency of use, importance and stacks. There is a 
recycling box and it never comes back
empty. There is not enough room so there are piles here and there and cupboards and 
utility shelves that overflow. The
books suffer form too much authority, control, inequality, overcrowding, segregation 
and abuse, and neglect.

T.



Rod Stasick wrote:

 Hey! Tell that to my Eno: "More Dark than Shark"
 on one side and Stockhausen: "Toward a Cosmic
 Music" on the other. (Hey, It's gettin' ItChY in
 here.^.^.^




Re: FLUXLIST: Does Anyone Know???

2000-04-28 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I moved from 2200 4 br 3 bath condo in a tough (-est) part of town to a ritzy 700 sq 
ft. art studio in a very good
neighbourhood (there was a protest over it's building here). My partner stayed brifly 
then left calling my new place a
prison. I do art and shift books alone in my velvet cell.


T.




Jay Marvin wrote:

 Every book I own screams in pain! I need a bigger apartment here in Chicago! My 
bookshelves are like American prisons. .
 .they suffer from overcrowding.

 Jay

 Terrence J Kosick wrote:

  Terrence writes;
 
  If books could talk what would they say to each other?
  Thinking about that makes me wonder just how careful you have to be when shelving.
 
  I moved recently and built 3x 8'long 2 level shelves. I shift and sort and find I 
am reviewing my books and discovering
  which are read or unread much read and needs to be re-read. Placement is 
everything as well. usually by subject but the
  locations are also based on frequency of use, importance and stacks. There is a 
recycling box and it never comes back
  empty. There is not enough room so there are piles here and there and cupboards 
and utility shelves that overflow. The
  books suffer form too much authority, control, inequality, overcrowding, 
segregation and abuse, and neglect.
 
  T.
 
  Rod Stasick wrote:
 
   Hey! Tell that to my Eno: "More Dark than Shark"
   on one side and Stockhausen: "Toward a Cosmic
   Music" on the other. (Hey, It's gettin' ItChY in
   here.^.^.^

 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: FLUXLIST: The Early Video Project

2000-05-06 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

The Early Video Project site is an important link to the past for new media.

Way to go Davidson Gigliotti.

The Early Video Project Supported by; Emily Harvey of the Emily Harvey Gallery,
New York;
and Francesco Conz, Editions Francesco Conz, Verona, Italy.

terrence kosick
artnatural


Davidson Gigliotti wrote:

 The Early Video Project is pleased to announce the opening of the Early
 Video Project web site at: http://208.55.137.252/index.html

 We will have a proper domain name when it gets transferred from Internic.

 It is text intensive and opens a discussion of early video history. There is
 material of interest to those are interested in Fluxus.

 We are very open to comment, and information that may be incorrect or left
 out. We hope you enjoy our site.

 Davidson




Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus Pebble

2000-05-07 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

The Fable of the Fluxus Pebble...

"...a my little fluxter, you will know only when you can take the
Fluxus Pebble from my hand..."

T.





Rod Stasick wrote:

 --- allen bukoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The first rule of Fluxus is not to talk about
  Fluxus.
 
  I believe that is the second rule.
  The first rule you cannot even say.

 ummm, you don't say?

 (summarizing)

 r





Re: FLUXLIST: arts journal

2000-05-07 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

eww!!!  cat fight!

T.

Patricia wrote:

 Heiko Recktenwald wrote:

   http://www.artsjournal.com/Arts%20beat.htm
  
   worth reading!
 
  Why ? Because of the magic word "art" ? Could you explain ?

 The worth is in the content and needs no explanation.  Check it
 out.  You've got to get out of that magicword mindthink, Heiko,
 (YOU are the magician, ; ) and on to the yellow brick road.

 Peformance:

 double click link above with mouse, repeating seven times, "I am
 the magician."

 read what you wish, if not enough magic does happen to pique your
 interest , "close your eyes, make a wish, hit delete."

 (ooops, I believe that was a quote...from "website unseen")

 kiss kiss,
 sparkle,sparkle
 clicking heels 3 times,
 PK




Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus Pebble

2000-05-08 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

the secret is the reply e-mail and

Patricia wrote:

 And only then will the little fluxter (fluxter???  I would think fluxer)
 achieve enlightenment?  Or is the fable of the pebble feeble and peppered
 with handy parables?  What is the sound of one pebble passing from the
 palm?  I believe you have violated the second rule, below, even, and I
 have possibly violated the third rule, of the reply function.

 *gasp*

 Princess Petal





Re: FLUXLIST: Napster/ArtsJournalArticle/ArtistsRights

2000-05-08 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I think trading is OK.  Kids used to trade pogs. It's not much different with
pop music that is specifically aimed at exploiting a youth market, especially
Metalica; ~pogs dun dun dun dun draang drannng dun dun dun dun dun pogs
pogs pogs.~


T.

Sol Nte wrote:

- all the artists who complain about

 this kind of thing are loaded anyway.




Re: FLUXLIST: Napster/ArtsJournalArticle/ArtistsRights

2000-05-08 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Paintings are different. They are more like a fabulous concert played only once.
They are one of a kind. (Mp3's are more like cheap posters but better). Packaged
and distributed cd's are the fancy seriographs. But you know the new money making
concept for soft media. Design once sell many times.

I think the artists need to get more from the music but I think it this is more
about money grubbing promoters and distributors then musicians. The artits speaking
against mp3 are acting more as spokespeople for the suits who are just paracitical
creatures who feel threatened by those they seek to exploit.

~Die suits die dun dun dun dun daannggg!mp3 killed the suits mps killed the
suits! yaaa! dun dun dun dun dun drang! Die suits die dun dun dun dun
daannggg! dun dun dun dun daannggg! mp3 killed the suits mps killed the
suits! yaaa!~


T.




ann klefstad wrote:

 How about we cut out the bits of paintings we don't like, too, and demand our
 money back? How come people who complain about spending their hardearned money
 on art always follow up by criticizing artists for being too desirous of money?
 Like bitching about spending an extra ten bucks isn't materialistic?

 Come on. Artists are human beings. They make interesting artifacts, that's what
 they do. They are not responsible for pleasing you, they are responsible for
 making interesting artifacts. You are responsible for finding the flipping inner
 resources to make the most of those artifacts. Of course tomorrow I'll take up
 the other cause. I'm just tired of hearing people say, "I'm too cheap to give
 money  to those moneygrubbing musicians."

 AK

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Can we ask bands to return cd money for the portion of the cds that aren't
  any good? Like when you have to buy a whole cd to get two or three songs you
  really like? Why do we have to pay for all the songs when we don't want em?




Re: FLUXLIST: Napster/ArtsJournalArticle/ArtistsRights

2000-05-08 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes,


Minidisc and has the size and tactilty and physical archiving/ labeling
and  I prefer. Anything that makes the recording and handling pleasurable
is great.
syquest 135 is/was better to use and faster but zip became the standard.

Even if it gets skipped as a standard Minidisc still is great to use for us
affectionado's.


I still find the microphone handeling awkward. Maybe there is an ear
implant mike in the future. Who knows we might even be downloading sensory
info from and to our brains from a finger diode in the future. ( Reminds me
of the famous Titan ? painting of God and Adams finger meeting up.)

T.



Lord Hasenpfeffer wrote:

  We suffer with VHS instead of Beta
 and with PCs instead of Amigas for similar reasons.

 Myke




FLUXLIST: The Brad Brace 24hr Dance Beat

2000-05-08 Thread Terrence J Kosick


The Brad Brace 24hr Dance Beat
12hr-images in
UK music-clubs!




 All you  animals hop to the beat all you  animals look at the floor
 all those blurs are movin' feet movin' to the sound bad bad sound movin'
 them up and movin' them down
 buildings rockin' in your town I can hear the dogs howilin in the pound
 faces in your head faces in your head.. smilin' faces grovin' to the sound

 fairground centrifuge goes round and round
 fireworks sis bam boom sis man bown round and round  round and round
 everyone dancin' to the beat the Brad Brace Beatjpeg is food for the freaks
 all the freaks hop to the beat the Brad Brace Beat the Brad Brace Beat

 landscapes landscapes Chez Monet
 industrial landscapes  Van Van Gogh
 mass production (25 bot--tles in a row)

 feet to the toe feet to the toe toe toe toe tic tac toe tic tac toe dancin'
 to the beat the Brad Brace Beat Domestic icons blender girls like to spin
 dancin' to this beat is a sinmodern icons cars for the boys cars for the
 boys like to go.. good for the go..good for the go phyco patterns spin your
 head crazy photo's spin your head 42  people out on the floor.. dance to
 the beat... the Brad Brace Beat.

 57 varieties people parts.. ears feet clapin hands in the morgue listen and
 twitch listen and twitch every thing is lookin for their feet so they can
 also dance to the beat... the Brad Brace Beat.

so all you people get off your chair get up right now get up log in to the
sqid and see those images go round and round
reflection mixes party fixins roads lead away lead the way ge to the Brad
Brace site today

 20  statues listen in the Park
 trains a' grovin' bodies in the dark
 water boys keep us cool as we all move and click to the beat the Brad Brace
 Beat the Brad Brace Beat


by Art Natural

inspired by the The 12hr-ISBN-JPEG Project







Re: FLUXLIST: Napster/ArtsJournalArticle/ArtistsRights

2000-05-09 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

excellent intuitive set up.  I'll check it out minidisco.com  now.

btw can you control off the unit, as is there a way to remote pause/record on the
mic line in?

Nice to have a hand on the unit (he he) but it is slippery, I added stick on
neopream bumpers on my sony minidisc after my first drop and kick.
 Id like to get a zoom mic (parabolic?) as well for coloring/detailing. Any ideas
on that?

thanks

T.





Re: FLUXLIST: Napster/ArtsJournalArticle/ArtistsRights

2000-05-09 Thread Terrence J Kosick



{ brad brace } wrote:

  I was most surprised 'to hear' that all the chants and
 stomping that the fans do during the game are prompted by
 prerecorded/broadcasts in the stadium.


Terrence writes;

It is even less obvious to all, but the thinking eye and mind, that the art
galleries/institutions have something similar to this operating for years.

T.




Re: FLUXLIST: RE: 2

2000-05-10 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

yes! The aural world of random sounds is as varied as the random ocular one.
I hope we can hear orchestrations from the list. Perhaps we can start
trading sounds. Anyone?

I am looking to get a deal on a Macki digital mixing board. Ideas anyone?

T.



Heiko Recktenwald wrote:

 Isnt Terence also mididisking ?

 Please do burn your minidisks recording !!

 And do send tapes around.

 Tapes have become incredible cheap when I was looking around last time. 5
 maxells around 10 or 12 dm, 12 dm the better ones ("s")...

 Anybody interested in a tape of John McLaughlin in the Miles band,
 February 70 ?





Re: FLUXLIST: net-economies (was napster, etc.)

2000-05-14 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Beam it

http://click.mp3.com/c/c_bDab/n_286662834/u_my/

T.


Lord Hasenpfeffer wrote:

  I have no clue yet as to how MP3s are actually
 created.




Re: FLUXLIST: Art and Economies

2000-05-16 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I'd be interested in the things economic theorists have to say that relate
to artists. Aritsts as manufactures of artifacts as well as artist as
promoters of creative concepts.

I am currently developing a few creative commerce ideas inspired by the net.

Keep in mind there are e-venture capitalists with money to burn.
Expenditures on interactive and possibly profitable creative e-ventures, if
only for the attaction value they have are more of a consideration in a
rapidly growing market. I feel the key is to be yourself and have fun. That
is an attractor.

T.

artnatural-e



May wrote:

 Robbin Neal Murphy wrote:

  OTOH, I would be very interested in economic models for artists and the
  net.

 then I would suggest that you have a look at the work of Freidrich von
 Hayek and that of the Austrian School of Economics in general.




Re: FLUXLIST: Imagine

2000-05-16 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

imagine there's no heaven, above us on--ly sky ..imagine all the
p-e-o-p-l-e liv-ing for to-day -ey ey iii


T.


{ brad brace } wrote:

 I'm glad you said it ;)

 On Tue, 16 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  God this is insufferable!!!
 




Re: FLUXLIST: Imagine

2000-05-16 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

It's a belief system. If you belive there is something, there is, because
you think.
I mean if you belive in God you have to belive in the devil angels etc.
It's not about being rational, but then purly rational beings are sort of
boring and perhaps even preditory. Heaven and God is a measure of hope.
You are by your associations. Its a safty measure. A reliable place to
hang ones weary mind.

Loyalty is important, lack of or betrayal is devastating to us. My dog's
love me but they know nothing of Christ and their loyality is to me. They
wag thier tails when i pay attention to them. They trust and have faith in
me. Above them there is only sky. I never let them down. If people could
do the same we wouldn't need a Heaven.

arf! arf!

T.

Lord Hasenpfeffer wrote:

  imagine there's no heaven, above us on--ly sky

 And this, of course, assumes that there is a Heaven and not only sky
 otherwise there'd be no need to imagine it the other way around, right?

 Myke




Re: FLUXLIST: Art and Economies

2000-05-17 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

It's a game of time. Time is money and it takes time to make art.
Independence is bought with obscurity. Face it many artist's are made popular
by those who's interests are in trade. Some artits are good at making
themselves popular and available to those interests. Others trade time and
wait in little comfort.

Time and art can be sucked by independence. At some point you have to buy in.
The clock is ticking.

T.




George Free wrote:

 I contend that the most engaging art tends to be created when the
 artist is working as closely as possible to a subsistance level, that is,
 with a minimum of "imported" raw material as possible so that the need to
 "export" (and be controlled by the market) is minimalized.

 Wouldn't control by the market be minimized most often when the artist has
 an independent income?

 GF




Re: FLUXLIST: Art and Economies

2000-05-17 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Being resourceful is part of the fun. I did a series of large paintings
using iron grindings from a nearby brake shop. I used some pickling
vinegar to produce a precipitate of iron which imparted rich brown
orange hues to the canvas. I used acrylic washes afterwards and later
still additions of oil paint colors when i could afford it. I worked in
an old double garage with salvaged building studs as stretcher frames.
Since i worked in an over grown garden my work reflected its growing
nature in moth process and form. The images were of roots and branches.
I later added a few fish and a few slugs added trials to the surfaces
which i traced. I did over 30 paintings this way. I still reflect my
immediate environment and places i visit. I use bits and pieces of
whatever things and ideas i come across. I still belive in utility such
as utilities of work for pleasure. It is a matter of what you apply it
to. If it comes to food rent or paint some artists choose paint, some
food, a cheap apartment and rust or whatever.


T.
artnatural






"narvis  ...pez" wrote:

 At 09:54 pm -0700 16/5/00, Patricia wrote:
 So, sometimes I
 DO need to buy materials.
 
 Best,
 PK

 sometimes i agree with buy materials too

 regards

 ...pez




Re: FLUXLIST: Congratulations !

2000-05-18 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

He probably needs a new roof.

T.


"Villani, Adam" wrote:

 Umm I understand Newton's case, but the Beastie Boys song is 8 years
 old... what took him so long?




Re: FLUXLIST: Abe Lincoln Speaks.... and Lao Tzu

2000-05-18 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Telkwkce wrufogs;

Wokjwf klfheb vesmoniws bohby goljinq.

hijvac.








Re: FLUXLIST: Imagine

2000-05-19 Thread Terrence J Kosick


Right on George~!
T.
George Free wrote:
After the talk I was reading a Linux user group
newspaper I
picked up that included a short article by Richard Stallman talking
about
the origin of copyright and how he thought that it was originally
devised to
protect creators and was now being used by corporations to prevent
people
from freely circulating ideas The debates from the revolutionary
period
of the 19th century are still very much with us...



Re: FLUXLIST: the creative act

2000-05-19 Thread Terrence J Kosick





Terrence writes;

I don't agree with this. Duchamp, in a purely objective practical way, was a
sort of a clever aragont lazy artist and he was not a professional painter. He
was more of a dabbler and and a chess player and mostly unemployed. He talked
more than he produced art. I don't feel he really became a professional artist
who could sustain his occupation. He said some interesting things and open the
minds of culture thinking of art in a different ways.

I think the spectator brings sustainablitity to the atists works by opening
their wallets. Something duchamp never realized nor probably could as he was
not able to, living up to his name beyond a few shocking works and words, a
kind of avoidence, a fear of eventual failure. He realized he could not
support himself. A sutuation many artists sadly find themselves in.

terrence kosick
artnatural






"narvis  ...pez" wrote:


 "all in all, the creative act is not performed by the artist alone; the
 spectator brings the work in contact with the external world by deciphering
 and interpreting its inner qualifications and thus adds his contribution to
 he creative act.* this becomes even more obvious when posterity gives its
 final veredict and sometimes rehabilites forgotten artists."

 m.duchamp
 april 1957

 * "duchamp has emphasisez several times the role of the viewer, which he
 epitomized in the formula 'the viewer are those who make the painting'
 (bibl. 245, p. 143.) as kris points out , 'psychoanalytic investigation of
 artistic creation has abundantly demonstrated the importance of the public
 for the process of creation: wherever artistic creation takes place, the
 idea of a public exists, though the artist may attribute this role to one
 real or imaginary person. the artist may express indifference , may
 elminate the consideration for an audience  from his consciousness
 altogether , or he may minimize its importance. but wherever the
 unconscious aspect of artistic creation is studied, a public of some kind
 emerges. this does not mean that striving for success, admiration , and
 recognition, need be the mayor goal  of all artistic creation . on the
 contrary, artist are more likely than others to renounce public recognition
 for the sake of their work. this quest need not be for approval of the many
 but for response by some. the acknowledgement  by response, however, is
 essential to confirm their own belief in their work and to restore the very
 balance which the creative process may have disturbed. response of others
 alleviates the artist's guilt." Bibl. 167, p. 60.

 as




Re: FLUXLIST: Bureaucracy and Eddy Edwards

2000-05-13 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Sounds like a script about bureaucracy and those who get a thrill from
enforcing rules and regulations.

It reminds me of a siding salesman (among other professions) named Eddy
Edwards. Eddy used to work out at a gym popular with young jocks and
professional players and a few "rounders", guys who like to make a quick buck
doing whatever it takes to keep out of the 9-5. Eddy was your typical wise guy.
A small time hustler. At the time he was selling roofs windows vinyl siding to
whatever sucker he could charm. Me and my pals fresh from school and pumped by
testosterone liked the prattle of risky bussiness and marveled at the the tough
boasts of the cool/dangerous characters that hung out at the gym. Eddy stood
out like the archtype of the breed. It was always 'hey Eddy ows it going?' Eddy
always had a smile and a good story.

 Eddy dissapeared for a time. No one knew where he went. I found out when he
showed up a year later. Eddy Edwards had a good story. After being chased out
of small towns across the province, Eddy said he went out to Calgary Alberta to
try his luck selling vinyl siding in the oil patch. Eddy was not used to the
regulations and licencing procedures and his usual short cut methods were not
paying off. Eddy knew that if you don't get the work cleared over hurdles like
heritage and zoning regs fast enough the deal could sour. (When the customer
could have the time to double check the exorbitant price.)

It seems Eddy was having a tough time with delays and red tape of City Hall
Engineering and Provincial Heritage regs. Eddy was new to the territory and was
not sure how to get his way. No matter what, Eddy the outsider, was foiled by
the officious dry clerks who would not warm up to his sweet talk and hints of a
'little extra' to get the thing through. Deal after deal soured due to delays
and holdups by the bureaucracy and officious clerks. Eddy got frustrated one
day after being letdown by a particullary malicious diminutive clerk who
dismissed Eddy with an air of smarmy detest. Eddy flipped and told the clerk if
he did'nt pass his licence application (for a particulary large apartment
project) "I'll put you in a pine box". Eddy got 6 months. He came back to his
old territory and made amends with his old bureaucratic 'connections'.

The gym closed a few years later and I had'nt seen Eddy for 20 years untill a
few months ago when I was in Small Claims Court to get a slumlord to pay up on
a contract (he did). Eddy was there! Eddy Edward the hustler, the wise guy was
a little grayer and sadly a bit hunched over. Eddy was all alone seeking
damages from the Public transit Corporation for some sort of injury. The
Transit's Lawyer was there with 3 witnesses. Eddy had supposidly "slipped" and
injured himself getting off a bus. (Eddy never slipped in his life). The Judge
said he had no time to listen to so many witnesses and granted a continuence.
Eddy seemed very happy. Such bureaucratic delays ment Eddy! might force The
Transit People to a settlement as this was costing them more (lawyer and
witnesses about 1,400.00 ) then Eddie's time.  Eddy Edwards older but wiser
found that by joining bureaucracy, keeping his claim under 10,000.00 (and out
of the very costly Supreme court) he could get his way. I smiled and watched as
the wise old grey fox, Eddy Edwards paced his way out on this, his new
territory.

T.



alan bowman wrote:

when she was

 back in the post-office she was called to one side by  a member of staff,
 and reprimanded for posting a non-regulation sized envelope, which the woman
 had in her hand!  . politely asked for the card back so
 she could put it in a regulation sized envelope.
 she was told that this was impossible!??  the card remains confiscated...




Re: FLUXLIST: Strong Buy Recommendation - last one went up 125% since April 13(fwd)

2000-05-15 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Strong caution. Any stock promoted that has anything to do with
Vancouver is questionable. 'Strong dip' is the promoters and pals
tripling etc their cash.

tempting but naaa

T.




Re: FLUXLIST: the creative act

2000-05-20 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Art is commercial the moment you seek to engage it as "culture". ie in the culture
industry.  Duchamp was revoultutionalry thinker for the arts but not necessrily a
revolutionary professional artist. He canged the art making oeuvre but for other
artists with their interpretations as "conceptual art" .

I find him interesting and somewhat important for this century but i don't feel he is
a "hero" but for conceptual artists, whose artwork, by being exhibited in a gallery,
is indeed inside a frame none-the-less. Perhaps I am prejudice as a free thinking
artist exploring the worlds of creative posibilities with the opinion that art can
indeed fall outside the gallery / institutional context with an audience of one other
person no less. A single communication with a single response.

Maybe that will make me a hero to some d-e-conceptual artists in the future


terrence kosick
artnatural







Re: FLUXLIST: the creative act

2000-05-20 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes

Postitution is an honest exchange at a fair market value or as supply and demand
and it never seeks to qualify for grants to support it.

I abohore patriarchy as an infantile wish. I see Duchamp as a creator of ideas
that some pick up on. It's not a rule, like a lesson from daddy unless you make it
so. How dreary to think that you have to seek father's avice everytime you go out
to have an adventure. How would anything new be discovered? Might as well hop back
in the womb of another man's ideas and play it safe if you won't take risks.

terrence kosick
artnatural








Re: FLUXLIST: the creative act

2000-05-21 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

ok ok i am playing devils advocate (and being a bit playful) but really one must go on
you have to look at the circumstances of the time. He was way ahead of his time but so
were others. People still paint and many more paint and don't know a thing of the 1913
armory show. I think its important to have inconsistancies and not just be a producer 
or
a fame monger for that matter.


Patricia wrote;


 - he was the ultimate in risk-takers because he didn't give a damn.

In a way he had nothing to loose other painters were gaining more attention than him. 
He
owes more to them and to Dada and the surrealists. He was intellectually 
opportunistic. I
don't belive he was taking the lead.

T. ;-)



 I see him as an
 artist who broke the rules, changed the course, and because of his fame, or infamy,
 was written up in capital letters, thus, got noticed.  Speaking of same (fame?), 
where
 would the art world be without The Armory Show of 1913?

 Pulling down a tome and resorting to quotes, and quotes within quotes from the
 catalogue accompanying "The Spirit of Fluxus"

 "Especially influential to Fluxus were the ideas of the artist and philosopher Marcl
 Duchamp (associated both with Dada and Surrealism) and the composer and teacher John
 Cage (an admirer of Duchamp who maintained an interest both in Dada and in
 non-Western, nonrationalized thought, and who passed on these interests to a new
 generation of young, postwar artists).  As Ben Vautier wrote:  'Without Cage, Marcel
 Duchamp, and Dada, Fluxus would not exist...Fluxus exists and creates from the
 knowledge of this post-Duchamp (the ready-made) and post-Cage (the depersonalization
 of the artist) situation."


 PK




Re: FLUXLIST: ANNALEE NEWMAN, 1909-2000

2000-05-24 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

What would Greenburg say?

Another part of the past passes. I can remember seeing the film Painter's Painting in 
1985 and listening to Barnet Newman's good faith and feeling so enthusiastic about 
painting. Those were the days and
things have changed since 1985.

Something better start happenin here. The times they are changing faster! Good faith 
indeed!~

T.

Rod Stasick wrote:

  ANNALEE NEWMAN, 1909-2000

  Annalee Newman, 91, widow of Abstract Expressionist
  painter Barnett Newman
  who established the Barnett Newman Foundation after his
  death, died at home
  in New York on May 10





Re: FLUXLIST: ANNALEE NEWMAN, 1909-2000

2000-05-25 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

I am never going back to my student bacement suite.

T.

Patricia wrote:

 I offer you this, Terrencegood faith...

 We shall not cease from exploration
  And the end of all our exploring
  Will be to arrive where we started
  And know the place for the first time.

-T.S. Eliot

 Terrence J Kosick wrote:

  Terrence writes;
 
  What would Greenburg say?
 
  Another part of the past passes. I can remember seeing the film Painter's Painting 
in 1985 and listening to Barnet Newman's good faith and feeling so enthusiastic about 
painting. Those were the days and
  things have changed since 1985.
 
  Something better start happenin here. The times they are changing faster! Good 
faith indeed!~
 
  T.
 
  Rod Stasick wrote:
 
ANNALEE NEWMAN, 1909-2000
  
Annalee Newman, 91, widow of Abstract Expressionist
painter Barnett Newman
who established the Barnett Newman Foundation after his
death, died at home
in New York on May 10
  




Re: FLUXLIST: Napster/ArtsJournalArticle/ArtistsRights

2000-05-11 Thread Terrence J Kosick

He who paints good gets stoned first.

T.




Re: FLUXLIST: mp3s

2000-05-18 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

How do people with large collections of music listen to them all on a
any regular basis?

Consider if you listen to music more often than books then  the fact
that when a thing is collected and put away it suffers a sort of
silence, a little prisoner of commodification for which the artist is
paid for their work be quiet most of the time.

Aso; If someone plays a particular piece of music for a party of 50 and
several people go out and buy the artists work because of that then the
host does a kind of free promotional service. Therfore mps3 is both a
way for music to be copeid and silenced and also acts as a catalist for
free promotion for the artists.

An artist whose work is most often copied/mp3 could revel in that it
could get free promoton as a trade for being copied. If they are
bothered it is that they are not just deprived of income but that they
perhaps don't care if the work is more often enjoyed but that it suffers
the din of silence in archives of thousands with little play rotation
abd that it is not a dead end commodity whose purpose is mostly
exchange.

Most popular songs are played for a period after their release then they
are archived and played less often. It is that early period of a musical
peices release that is mostly of concern as it can indeed hurt
sales/profit margins. The issue of mp3 could be more easily resoved on
the movie release model. Ie video release. The popular artits could,
after a period of say 4-6 months, delcare the work mp3 free.

However it is the artits who reputation is just rising who's work takes
longer to be discovered who could suffer from less income. The trade off
there is that they could gain more attention by mp3 release. Indeed
emerging artists are being discovered this way.

It seems some have nothing much to lose, considering their existing
popularity and wealth and emerging artits something to gain from mp3
while others whose returns are entering the profit margin could have the
most difficulties.

I think an mp3 release date should be worked out somehow.

T.
artnatural



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The art and business of music is changing.
 May as well change with it...
 That is, eschew stasis.
 Check out:
 http://www.sfbg.com/AandE/34/32/boring.html




Re: FLUXLIST: love seeing my name the subject heading

2000-06-05 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

at times we feel we are but a fiction

artnatural








Re: FLUXLIST: Mo***ento removed

2000-06-22 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

wrong? He/she is some whacked dude posting personal and sexual degrading
comments. Every society has moderating filters. Protecting it's members' esteem
should be every lists' moderators priority. In the case of free speech societies'
freedoms unchecked can lead to degradation of the whole group. As far as I know
were not here to engage group therapy for sociopaths. Shut em out.


T.
the perkier lurker



{ brad brace } wrote:

 On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Sol Nte wrote:

  I was saddened to see the nasty post from mo***ento in my inbox this morning
  and have thus acted to prevent mo***ento from posting to this list.

 This is wrong.   /:b





Re: FLUXLIST: Re: stamps (for fluxlist?)

2000-06-28 Thread Terrence J Kosick


Terrence writes;
I almost forgot about this. Personalized stamps. I wonder of the many
clever ways this can be utilized?
This might be a fun way of getting some good publicity by jamin` with
the post's latest thang.
Just what are the costs and the restrictions?

T.
artnatural.
I will be out of my mind from 06/25/2000 until 07/05/2000.
I will respond to your message when I return. Please
call Dr. Cooper
604-733-5995 if you need my immediate attention.


Carol Starr wrote:
hi PK,
in today's nytimes.com
wonderful, as i told kiku this morning, don't you love it?
best, Carol :) :) :)

CALGARY JOURNAL

Topple the Queen! Enthrone Yourself on a Stamp

For Canadians tired of airbrushed photos of the queen on their

stamps, Canada Post suggests the 21st-century alternative:

personalize your postage with a photo of the new baby or the loyal

dog.
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/americas/062700canada-journal.html
carol starr
taos, new mexico, usa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FLUXLIST: My Blue Poop

2000-06-28 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Very clever passing note for art school. Blue poop beats beets. ;-)

T.

James Smith wrote:

 I am a lurker, but Champoy's post prompted me to write.  I have just
 recently graduated University in May 2000.  In one of my final courses,
 entitled "Experimental Concepts," we were asked to develop a project
 centered around time--specifically we were to create a piece that would be
 clearly affect by time.  I purchased an enormous blue cake--frosting 
 bread, everything was blue--horrifically radioactive blue.  At critique I
 served the cake, along with blue punch.  After everyone was finished, I
 passed out self-addressed (addressed to me) postcards with simply "Yes" or
 "No."  I asked them to let me know if they were "affected" by my
 piece--hence the "Yes" or "No."  The postcards served as documentation 
 even exist as another piece unto itself.  It was most exciting, and fun for
 me.

 I think projects such as these give new meaning to Art Movement.

 Enjoy,
 James

 --
 From: CHAMPOY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: FLUXLIST: Re: FLUXLIST-digest V1 #357
 Date: Tue, Jun 27, 2000, 4:36 AM
 

 
  i'm trying to make artworks out of my feces by trying
  to eat different kinds of foods and drinking some
  edible coloringsany suggestions what other kinds
  of food that i might eat to produce such a very
  interesting effect on my feces.
 
  -champoy hate
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
  http://mail.yahoo.com/




Re: FLUXLIST: Re: FLUXLIST-digest V1 #370

2000-07-05 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Fluxlist Calculus

many people + much crap = much confusion

T.



Andrew Dalio wrote:

 I'm a little confused. How can so many people put out so much pretentious crap 4 
times a day?

 Just wondering,

 -andrew




Re: FLUXLIST: WANTED

2000-07-06 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Some have been trying for years. I have greatfully accepted my role in
the fluxlist e-mail performance.

T.

Ilya Monosov wrote:

 PLEASE GET ME OF THIS LIST. EMAIL ME AT
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell me how i can get the hell
 of it!! sorry to be rude, but i tried asking and
 i can not deal with the volume of posts





Re: FLUXLIST: galleries

2000-07-09 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;


This is possible online with co-creation. In Physical spaces. Areas of
neutrality; line ups and waiting areas are possible places for artistic
encounters. I have also used public bulletin boards at a local university. I
mounted bulletin boards at a cafe gallery but the management took them down
because people were interacting with them! *l*) Sidewalks, and players where
kids and parents can participate in chalk art is also a good start. The public
artillery here have a art creation area that parallels the current exhibition
with thematically media, materials and ideas for the public to interact and
create with/from.

I still don't rule out galleries but the relationships artist curator patron
critic could use as little re-evaluation. The artists who are not with the
in-crowd in any given art school grad year have a harder time engaging their
work. Some feel silenced. Something may be wrong with the way the system is and
how it is run. Change is good. Righ now the system works for a few. Some get
blacklisted or ignored for many reasons. Galleries are oft guick to reject even
very good work if it can't sell it. Youth alienation and even cases of suicide
have occured. Others find better success by moving to larger centers of
services and larger surface areas for cultural engagement. Artist run can be
even more exclusive. If you look at it realistically sometimes being accpted is
a way to shut down the evolution of the cultural engagement of artistic
practice. Who knows what destiny can hold?

Do your work and eventually things can happen. Finding time for your creative
work is often the greatest strggle if you don't get plugged in right off.
Sometimes it just takes years. Hang in and keep on creating while developing
new ways and mediums to be more creatively/culturally engaged is the way to go.

terrence
artnatural + here and now or storage.

George Free wrote:



 A genuinely popular art has to be established on the basis of a new
 relationship between artists and their public.

 Consider Filliou and Brecht and their shop Cédille qui Sourit. Filliou said
 "we conceived the Cédille qui Sourit as an international center of permanent
 creation, and so it
 turned out to be. We played games, invented and disinvented objects,
 corresponded with the humble and mighty, drank and talked with our
 neighbors, manufactured and sold by correspondence suspense poems and
 rebuses, started to compile an anthology of misunderstandings and an
 anthology of jokes..."

 A center of permanent creation, that is what galleries could be. Less a site
 of viewing and more a workshop, a place where artists --both professional
 and nonprofessional-- work to create works, where works are apprehended in
 construction, where the public can grasp the modus operandi of art and
 produce works themselves as a way of apprehending work.

 cheers,
 George




Re: FLUXLIST: galleries

2000-07-09 Thread Terrence J Kosick

erratum:

It should read; public artgallery and not public artillery.

Terrence J Kosick wrote:

The public

 * artillery *  here have a art creation area that parallels the current
 exhibition
 with thematically media, materials and ideas for the public to interact and
 create with/from.

Somehow i really like this spellcheck error, "public artillery" where people
(taxpayers/ voters) can paticipte in the (millitary) institution. h =-)



T.
artnatural







Re: FLUXLIST: Candy Rapper Opera

2000-07-09 Thread Terrence J Kosick

Terrence writes;

Wierd!~ Coincidentaly I am writing the Candy Rapper Opera. (I am Scoring in
some occasional voice bursts). I was inspired by my friends compliants of such
irritations.

T.