[Gimp-user] ufraw and gimp-2.10.10 ?

2019-06-12 Thread Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
Hi, I'm hoping I've merely got a wetware problem here and that
someone will point to a simple solution.

For a while I've been using nufraw as my raw-importer with 2.10, but
on my latest system builds that no-longer compiles (looks like
gcc-9.1.0 dislikes the C++ code).  I got pointed to the github
version of ufraw earlier (and managed to get past the exiv2 changes
by taking patches from there, but that was back on gcc-8.3.0).  I
saw that is actively maintained, so I've now tried it.

No problems building it (master as of last night).  I can run
ufraw-batch, but when I tried to edit my preferences in gimp it told
me that only Dark Table and Raw Therapy are supported (I think -
can't get it to repeat that message).  I had nufraw working in
2.10.10 with gcc-8.3.0 so I'm hoping there is a simple way to edit
the preference ?

(I tried both Dark Table and Raw Therapy a while ago, but found them
too difficult, and with too many dependencies, for my simple needs.
No doubt I could learn one of them, but if so I would not have time
to do anything else)

Everything here is built from source, mostly using current or
very-recent versions, so please do not ask "which distro".

ĸen
-- 
Before the universe began, there was a sound. It went: "One, two, ONE,
two, three, four" [...] The cataclysmic power chord that followed was
the creation of time and space and matter and it does Not Fade Away.
 - wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/Music_With_Rocks_In


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-13 Thread Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:57:05PM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
> 
> > configure: == summary =
> > configure: build GTK GUI: yes
> > configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
> >
>   Ah. Here is where things diverge:
> 
> configure:9400: == summary =
> configure:9402: build GTK GUI: yes
> configure:9404: build GIMP plug-in: no
> 
> because:
> configure:5646: checking for gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0
> configure:5653: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0"
> Package gimpui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> 
>   Apparently the configure script wants the 2.0 version of gimpui to be
> at least 2.2. The version in the system is 2.0.50.
>   It would seem I am SOL on this one.
> 
That sounds extremely odd - looking at mine, 0.42 followed that test
with tests for 2.4.0 and 2.9.0.

The version in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gimpui.pc should match the version
of gimp.

If you installed 2.8.22 yourself, in a non-standard prefix (that
probably also includes /usr/lib64) export the prefix at the start of
PKG_CONFIG_PATH, followed by whatever else is in PKG_CONFIG_PATH.

Retrack: I was reading what you posted, but I think the problem may
be slightly different - it says it did not find gimpui-2.0.pc at
all (package not found, rather than a failed version test).

Check what you have in PKG_CONFIG_PATH when trying to rebuild
nufraw, and of course check where your different versions of
gimpui-2.0.pc live.

ĸen
-- 
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
   -- Candide, de Voltaire
   (Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-13 Thread James Moe via gimp-user-list
On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:

> configure: == summary =
> configure: build GTK GUI: yes
> configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
>
  Ah. Here is where things diverge:

configure:9400: == summary =
configure:9402: build GTK GUI: yes
configure:9404: build GIMP plug-in: no

because:
configure:5646: checking for gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0
configure:5653: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0"
Package gimpui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.

  Apparently the configure script wants the 2.0 version of gimpui to be
at least 2.2. The version in the system is 2.0.50.
  It would seem I am SOL on this one.

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-13 Thread Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:39:37PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch via gimp-user-list 
wrote:
> On 09/12/2018 08:43:26 PM, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> > On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > 
> > > install  nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> > > and make it active with
> > > Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
> > >
> >   There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import anywhere.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I didn't mention I'm running Gimp-2.10.7 (GIT) - it might be that the
> Edit -> Preference menu looks different in older versions of Gimp.
> 
> Edit -> Preference has  the items
> 
> System Resources
> Debugging
> Color Management
> Image Import & Export   <
> Tool Options
> 
> 
> Helmut

I had to go to the box where I had installed nufraw with 2.8, so I
fired up that old system.  I cannot see any obvious way to edit how
a raw image should be opened in 2.8.  But nufraw is working there,
so I looked in ~/.gimp-2.8 and the only reference to nufraw is in
pluginrc, which has the opening lines:

# GIMP pluginrc
# 
# This file can safely be removed and will be automatically regenerated by
# querying the installed plugins.

So provided that nufraw-gimp is in /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/ (or
lib64 if your distro uses that), I would move the old ufraw plugin
out of there, rename pluginrc to pluginrc.bak in case things go
wrong, and restart gimp.

ĸen
-- 
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
   -- Candide, de Voltaire
   (Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-13 Thread Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:52:51AM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> On 09/10/2018 06:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 
> > I'm using nufraw-0.42 with 2.10.6
> >   ./autogen.sh;
> >   ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-contrast;
> >   make;
> >   make install
> > 
>   Okay.
> 
> > As far as I can see, 0.42 was working with 2.8.22.
> >
>   Any idea how to use it with 2.8?
> 
>   There are no instructions at the nufraw docs (such as they are). Gimp
> Help mentions using gimptool to install a plugin; except there is no
> gimptool app in the repository. There is no "Image Import" option in the
> 2.8 Preferences.
> 

For me, exactly the same instructions as for 2.10.  Needs an old
version of something (gtkimageview, perhaps), but that is exactly
the same as for ufraw.

Looking at my logs, it seems I was actually using 0.41 with 2.8.22
(from memory, 0.41 needed patching for gimp-dev).  Extracts from the
log:

configure: == summary =
configure: build GTK GUI: yes
configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
configure: EXIF support using exiv2: yes
configure: JPEG support: yes
configure: JPEG2000 (libjasper) support: no
configure: TIFF support: yes
configure: PNG support: yes
configure: FITS support: no
configure: gzip compressed raw support: yes
configure: bzip2 compressed raw support: yes
configure: lens defects correction support using lensfun: no

and during the install:

make[2]: Entering directory '/scratch/working/nufraw-0.41'
 /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins'

And then to use it, from within the gimp just open the raw file in
the normal way.  Possibly you will need to change one of the
settings to tell it to use nufraw instead of ufraw.

Oh, and apologies to the list for sending that original reply to
James - I seem to find it very easy on this list to send to the
poster.

ĸen
-- 
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
   -- Candide, de Voltaire
   (Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-13 Thread James Moe via gimp-user-list
On 09/10/2018 06:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:

> I'm using nufraw-0.42 with 2.10.6
>   ./autogen.sh;
>   ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-contrast;
>   make;
>   make install
> 
  Okay.

> As far as I can see, 0.42 was working with 2.8.22.
>
  Any idea how to use it with 2.8?

  There are no instructions at the nufraw docs (such as they are). Gimp
Help mentions using gimptool to install a plugin; except there is no
gimptool app in the repository. There is no "Image Import" option in the
2.8 Preferences.

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-13 Thread Helmut Jarausch via gimp-user-list

On 09/12/2018 08:43:26 PM, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:

On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

> install  nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> and make it active with
> Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
>
  There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import  
anywhere.




Sorry, I didn't mention I'm running Gimp-2.10.7 (GIT) - it might be  
that the

Edit -> Preference menu looks different in older versions of Gimp.

Edit -> Preference has  the items

System Resources
Debugging
Color Management
Image Import & Export   <
Tool Options


Helmut
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-12 Thread James Moe via gimp-user-list
On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

> install  nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> and make it active with
> Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
>
  There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import anywhere.

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

2018-09-10 Thread James Moe via gimp-user-list
GIMP 2.8.22
UFRaw 0.22
linux 4.12.14-lp150.12.16-default x86_64

The current version of GIMP has gotten twitchy about return values from
UFRaw:

Opening '/path/to/image/image-001.nef' failed: Procedure
'file-ufraw-load' returned no return values

Well, hmphh!
Now I must open the image in UFRaw directly, save the ppm file, then
open that with GIMP.

Is there way around this?

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

2018-03-14 Thread Gary Aitken

On 03/14/18 12:51, Rick Strong wrote:


If you are talking about photographs, altering the curve is not the
same as boosting the exposure.

Generally speaking, boosting the exposure makes the whole picture
brighter, while playing with the curve alters areas--shadows,
mid-range, highlights--of the photograph. But, you may play around
with one to end up with a result very similar to the other. This is
best done in raw.


I understand altering different parts of the curve affects different
aspects of the image, e.g. highlights vs midtones vs shadows.  What
I'm asking is if modifications to exposure and the base curve are applied
to the same thing at the same place in the pipeline.

For example, I am looking at an image where with 0 exposure and the
default linear (45 deg lower left to upper right) base curve,
the rightmost 3/8 of the histogram is empty.  It takes an increase in
exposure of about 1.33 to bring the curve to the far right.  I can
get what appears to be the same effect by grabbing the upper right
anchor of the line and dragging it left until it is about 3/8 of the
way from the vertical left axis, essentially just making the slope of
the line a lot steeper and leaving the origin at the lower left.

Are those equivalent operations, or are they doing something subtly
different in terms of what processing is done to the image?  They
appear to be equivalent.  But that may not be the case.  For
example, does boosting the exposure affect noise or bayer decoding
artifacts more than adjusting the curve?

Alterations to the base curve in ufraw are applied at one point in
the pipeline and alterations to the secondary curve (under "Correct
luminosity, saturation") tab are applied at a different point.
Changes to the secondary curve affect the image in a different
manner than the exposure and the base curve.

Thanks,

Gary

Not sure where to ask this as I couldn't find a ufraw forum, but I 
figured a number of users here might be able to answer.  Please 
redirect me if this is inappropriate.


Can anyone explain to me the difference between manipulating the base
curve in ufraw and boosting the exposure?  I'm wondering in terms of
where in the processing pipeline the change takes place. i.e. If I
could manipulate the base curve to make the image look exactly the
same (to my eye, I know it's not perfect) as boosting the exposure,
is there fundamentally a difference in the result?

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

2018-03-14 Thread Rick Strong

Hi Gary,

If you are talking about photographs, altering the curve is not the same as 
boosting the exposure.


Generally speaking, boosting the exposure makes the whole picture brighter, 
while playing with the curve alters areas--shadows, mid-range, 
highlights--of the photograph. But, you may play around with one to end up 
with a result very similar to the other. This is best done in raw.


Rick S.

-Original Message- 
From: Gary Aitken

Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 1:45 AM
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

Hi Folks,

Not sure where to ask this as I couldn't find a ufraw forum, but I
figured a number of users here might be able to answer.  Please
redirect me if this is inappropriate.

Can anyone explain to me the difference between manipulating the
base curve in ufraw and boosting the exposure?  I'm wondering in
terms of where in the processing pipeline the change takes place.
i.e. If I could manipulate the base curve to make the image look
exactly the same (to my eye, I know it's not perfect) as boosting
the exposure, is there fundamentally a difference in the result?

Thanks,

Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list 


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

2018-03-13 Thread Gary Aitken

Hi Folks,

Not sure where to ask this as I couldn't find a ufraw forum, but I
figured a number of users here might be able to answer.  Please
redirect me if this is inappropriate.

Can anyone explain to me the difference between manipulating the
base curve in ufraw and boosting the exposure?  I'm wondering in
terms of where in the processing pipeline the change takes place.
i.e. If I could manipulate the base curve to make the image look
exactly the same (to my eye, I know it's not perfect) as boosting
the exposure, is there fundamentally a difference in the result?

Thanks,

Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

2017-04-01 Thread Partha Bagchi
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Maurizio Loreti 
wrote:

>
> > On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist  wrote:
> >
> > Pat—
> >
> > thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a
> hard nut
> > to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw
> in the
> > previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to  use.
>
> Hello -
> I am a satisfied Mac user and an avid photographer; I use for the
> post-production of my pictures GIMP, namely the distribution (released by
> Simone Karin Lehmann) "GIMP on OS X", available under the URL
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx .  This distribution comes with
> a pre-compiled gimp-ufraw plugin; loading a RAW picture in GIMP is handled
> in this way.  However "GIMP on OS X" lacks a standalone ufraw and
> ufraw-batch.  Needing for my RAW pictures ufraw-batch, I compiled ufraw and
> ufraw-batch from the source code; however this is not completely described
> in the ufraw documentation.  Here is what I did.
>
> For the compiler, you need to install Xcode (from the Apple Store, free)
> and the Xcode command line tools; how to do that is described in a lot of
> places, Google will help.
>
> For the libraries, I have installed the ones supplied by the Macports
> projects:
>
>   +--+--+-+
>   |  | Package  | Version |
>   +--+--+-+
>   | LCMS | lcms2| 2.8 |
>   | EXIV2| exiv2| 0.25|
>   | JPEG | jpeg | 9b  |
>   | JPEG2000 | openjpeg | 2.1.2   |
>   | TIFF | tiff | 4.0.7   |
>   | PNG  | libpng   | 1.6.28  |
>   | ZIP  | zip  | 3.00|
>   | BZIP2| bzip2| 1.0.6   |
>   | LENSFUN  | lensfun  | 0.3.2   |
>   | CFITSIO  | cfitsio  | 3.390   |
>   | GTKIMAGEVIEW | gtkimageview | 1.6.4   |
>   +--+--+-+
>
> How to install them is described in the Macports home page,
> http://www.macports.org .
>
> The Macports libraries are compiled with clang and clang++ as C and C++
> compilers; while clang and gcc are fully compatible, and their object files
> linkable together, clang++ and g++ use different name mangling schemes; so,
> if you want e.g. exiv2 support (exiv2 is a C++ package) you need to change
> the default compilers.  So, finally, I unpacked, configured, compiled and
> installed ufraw/ufraw-batch with the following commands:
>
> tar xzf ufraw-0.22.tar.gz
> cd ufraw-0.22/
> CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include \
> LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib \
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22
> make
> sudo make install
> sudo ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 /opt/local/share/ufraw
> ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw ~/Applications/ufraw
> ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw-batch ~/Applications/ufraw-batch
> ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/share/man/man1/ufraw.1 ~/man/man1/ufraw.1
>
> Notes:
> - Macports include files are in /opt/local/include .
> - Macports libraries are in /opt/local/lib .
> - I installed ufraw in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 , a directory
> soft-linked to /opt/local/share/ufraw ; when a new release will
>   come, say 0.xy, it will be enough to install it in
> /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.xy and, then, change the soft link.
> - The executables ufraw and ufraw-batch are soft-linked to ~/Applications,
> where OS X expects to find user executables.
> - I have created ~/man/... for personal man files, and linked there
> ufraw.1, in order to have the output of "man ufraw".
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Maurizio Loreti  --  maurizio.lor...@gmail.com
>
>
> Or install my Mac builds McGimp which comes with a pre-compiled NUFRaw
which is the continuation of the UFRaw development. My build also comes
with G'MIC.

I don't think UFRaw is being maintained now. NUFRaw is currently at version
0.38.

I'd also recommend preprocessing with RawTherapee which I am also providing
either from my website or RT discussion site hosted by Pat.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

2017-04-01 Thread Maurizio Loreti

> On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist  wrote:
> 
> Pat—
> 
> thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
> to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
> previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to  use.

Hello -
I am a satisfied Mac user and an avid photographer; I use for the 
post-production of my pictures GIMP, namely the distribution (released by 
Simone Karin Lehmann) "GIMP on OS X", available under the URL 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx .  This distribution comes with a 
pre-compiled gimp-ufraw plugin; loading a RAW picture in GIMP is handled in 
this way.  However "GIMP on OS X" lacks a standalone ufraw and ufraw-batch.  
Needing for my RAW pictures ufraw-batch, I compiled ufraw and ufraw-batch from 
the source code; however this is not completely described in the ufraw 
documentation.  Here is what I did.

For the compiler, you need to install Xcode (from the Apple Store, free) and 
the Xcode command line tools; how to do that is described in a lot of places, 
Google will help.

For the libraries, I have installed the ones supplied by the Macports projects:

  +--+--+-+
  |  | Package  | Version |
  +--+--+-+
  | LCMS | lcms2| 2.8 |
  | EXIV2| exiv2| 0.25|
  | JPEG | jpeg | 9b  |
  | JPEG2000 | openjpeg | 2.1.2   |
  | TIFF | tiff | 4.0.7   |
  | PNG  | libpng   | 1.6.28  |
  | ZIP  | zip  | 3.00|
  | BZIP2| bzip2| 1.0.6   |
  | LENSFUN  | lensfun  | 0.3.2   |
  | CFITSIO  | cfitsio  | 3.390   |
  | GTKIMAGEVIEW | gtkimageview | 1.6.4   |
  +--+--+-+

How to install them is described in the Macports home page, 
http://www.macports.org .

The Macports libraries are compiled with clang and clang++ as C and C++ 
compilers; while clang and gcc are fully compatible, and their object files 
linkable together, clang++ and g++ use different name mangling schemes; so, if 
you want e.g. exiv2 support (exiv2 is a C++ package) you need to change the 
default compilers.  So, finally, I unpacked, configured, compiled and installed 
ufraw/ufraw-batch with the following commands:

tar xzf ufraw-0.22.tar.gz
cd ufraw-0.22/
CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include \
LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib \
./configure --prefix=/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22
make
sudo make install
sudo ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 /opt/local/share/ufraw
ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw ~/Applications/ufraw
ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw-batch ~/Applications/ufraw-batch
ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/share/man/man1/ufraw.1 ~/man/man1/ufraw.1

Notes:
- Macports include files are in /opt/local/include .
- Macports libraries are in /opt/local/lib .
- I installed ufraw in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 , a directory soft-linked to 
/opt/local/share/ufraw ; when a new release will
  come, say 0.xy, it will be enough to install it in 
/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.xy and, then, change the soft link.
- The executables ufraw and ufraw-batch are soft-linked to ~/Applications, 
where OS X expects to find user executables.
- I have created ~/man/... for personal man files, and linked there ufraw.1, in 
order to have the output of "man ufraw".

HTH

-- 
Maurizio Loreti  --  maurizio.lor...@gmail.com




___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

2017-04-01 Thread Chuanist
Pat—

thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to  use.

I will look at the alternatives you suggested. 

Regards,

Glen

>It may be easier (or make more sense) to use one of the newer raw
>processing softwares available? 

>
>pat

-- 
Chuanist (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

2017-03-30 Thread Pat David
It may be easier (or make more sense) to use one of the newer raw
processing softwares available?  They are a little more actively developed
and will likely support newer cameras better.  There's:

darktable: https://www.darktable.org
RawTherapee: http://www.rawtherapee.com

Each of these will let you develop your raw files, and then export them for
further modification in GIMP if desired!

pat

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:26 PM Chuanist  wrote:

> Dear GIMP-ers—
>
> I am running GIMP 2.8.20 on a Mac with Mavericks (Mac OS 10.9.5).
>
> The previous version, 2.4, automatically included Ufraw and would open the
> .RW2
> files from my Panasonic Lumix camera. (I was really impressed that it did.)
>
> I now must install Ufraw for the newest GIMP, but for my life I cannot
> discover
> how to do it. I have downloaded Ufraw .22, unzipped it, and there it sits
> in its
> folder. It seems that all of the components are present, but when I put it
> in
> either plug-in's or modules folders, at the root level of GIMP or in the
> 2.8
> folder, the program does not open .RW2 files.
>
> Is there a set of instructions for installing Ufraw? I see several
> references to
> MacPorts and the command line, but have to say they don't give me the info
> needed to make Ufraw work.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Glen
>
> --
> Chuanist (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

-- 
https://patdavid.net
GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D  18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

2017-03-30 Thread Chuanist
Dear GIMP-ers—

I am running GIMP 2.8.20 on a Mac with Mavericks (Mac OS 10.9.5).

The previous version, 2.4, automatically included Ufraw and would open the .RW2
files from my Panasonic Lumix camera. (I was really impressed that it did.)

I now must install Ufraw for the newest GIMP, but for my life I cannot discover
how to do it. I have downloaded Ufraw .22, unzipped it, and there it sits in its
folder. It seems that all of the components are present, but when I put it in
either plug-in's or modules folders, at the root level of GIMP or in the 2.8
folder, the program does not open .RW2 files.

Is there a set of instructions for installing Ufraw? I see several references to
MacPorts and the command line, but have to say they don't give me the info
needed to make Ufraw work.

Any help is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Glen

-- 
Chuanist (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

2016-04-22 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Alex Vergara Gil  [04-22-16 14:10]:
> UFRaw is not currently working in any 64 bit windows systems
> 
> Regards
> 
> 2016-04-19 8:08 GMT-04:00, Ofnuts :
> >
> > UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
> > but this is normally an add-on.
> >
> > On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:
> >> I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
> >> documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF
> >> (nikon)
> >> raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.
> >>
> >> any idea what I'm missing?
> >>
> >> tnx
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > gimp-user-list mailing list
> > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> > List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
> >
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

ufraw is not a gimp program, it was originally produced by Udi Fuchs.  If
you have found a problem with it, you should report it on sourceforge
where it is hosted.  You should find it, google..., and follow the
instruction for windows as provided.  It works on my wife's w10.  I have
to problem with it as I do not run *any* version of windows.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

2016-04-22 Thread Alex Vergara Gil
UFRaw is not currently working in any 64 bit windows systems

Regards

2016-04-19 8:08 GMT-04:00, Ofnuts :
>
> UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
> but this is normally an add-on.
>
> On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:
>> I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
>> documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF
>> (nikon)
>> raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.
>>
>> any idea what I'm missing?
>>
>> tnx
>>
>
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

2016-04-19 Thread Ofnuts


UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw, 
but this is normally an add-on.


On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:

I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF (nikon)
raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.

any idea what I'm missing?

tnx



___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

2016-04-16 Thread sjemmett
I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF (nikon)
raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.

any idea what I'm missing?

tnx

-- 
sjemmett (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw

2016-04-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Daniel Glueck  [04-10-16 15:07]:
> I want to load photos from my Canon.  They are already on the Mac in CR2 
> format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?
> 
> How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download? How 
> do I know this? What menu to go to? Nothing in Help or anything in the 
> program says ANYTHING about plug-ins.
> 
> I’m not one of you techno-weenies, I don’t want to “build”, or compile 
> anything. I just want to play with my photographs.

I would suggest you get darktable, there is a mac build.
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw

2016-04-10 Thread Pat David
Could you tell us exactly what the error says?

What happens if you go to file -> open, and choose one of the raw files,
but choose CR2 from the file type list?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM Daniel Glueck  wrote:

> I want to load photos from my Canon.  They are already on the Mac in CR2
> format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?
>
> How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download?
> How do I know this? What menu to go to? Nothing in Help or anything in the
> program says ANYTHING about plug-ins.
>
> I’m not one of you techno-weenies, I don’t want to “build”, or compile
> anything. I just want to play with my photographs.
>
>
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

-- 
Pat David
https://pixls.us
http://blog.patdavid.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

[Gimp-user] ufraw

2016-04-10 Thread Daniel Glueck
I want to load photos from my Canon.  They are already on the Mac in CR2 
format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?

How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download? How 
do I know this? What menu to go to? Nothing in Help or anything in the program 
says ANYTHING about plug-ins.

I’m not one of you techno-weenies, I don’t want to “build”, or compile 
anything. I just want to play with my photographs.


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

2015-09-12 Thread Pat David
jon777, have you tried one of the other more modern, dedicated raw
processors such as darktable or RawTherapee?

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:16 AM jon777  wrote:

> >Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.
> >
> >Hope this helps.
> >Partha
> A simple explanation---the software is not as good as some of the hype
> touting
> "Open Source." Ufraw freezes on my when trying to open .CR2 files in
> windows 7
> 64 bit from Gimp.
>
> Perhaps I need to stop trying so many opensource products.
>
> --
> jon777 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

2015-09-12 Thread jon777
>Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.
>
>Hope this helps.
>Partha
A simple explanation---the software is not as good as some of the hype touting
"Open Source." Ufraw freezes on my when trying to open .CR2 files in windows 7
64 bit from Gimp.

Perhaps I need to stop trying so many opensource products.

-- 
jon777 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-31 Thread elelont2
Ok Thanks all, it has been very helpful!

-- 
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread Partha Bagchi
GIMP 2.9.1 (current experimental builds) handle 16/32 bit images just
fine. Feel free to download from my website as it comes with UFRaw
included.

In any case, you have not provided the RAW CR2 file and so it's hard
to see what is happening here. When you say that your CR2 image is
"tack" sharp, you are probably using Canon supplied RAW decoder which
probably is applying it's version of "Picture Controls" prior to
displaying your image.

Hope this helps.

Partha


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:41 AM, programmer_ceds  wrote:
>>I tried the tiff format but it does not seems to make a lot of sense
>>with Gimp.
>>
>>Gimp cannot handle 16-bit tiff images and i lose a lot that extra
>>information from the 14-bit RAW file.
>>
>>Or am i missing something here?
>>
>>
>>Also, why does my windows show that the jpg files are 24bit - should
>>they not be 8bit? Or is it 8 bit per channel * 3?
>
> The current release version of GIMP (2.8.x) will only operate in 8-bit colour
> depth. The next version of GIMP is said to handle 8, 16 or 32-bits colour 
> depth
> (I only say "is said to" because I haven't tried it). You would therefore have
> to export an 8-bit tif from UFRaw for further processing in GIMP, or use the
> development version of GIMP (2.9.x) which is not recommended for 'important'
> work.
>
> If you want to work in more than 8 bits until any final conversion to jpg you
> have, at least, the following two alternatives -  use Photoshop/CS (which I
> don't have) or process your raw files in something like RawTherapee (available
> for Windows, Linux and Mac) or darktable (Linux and Mac only) - both of these
> programs are open source and available for free.
>
> I stand to be corrected on this but there is no 16-bit jpg format - so if you
> want to produce a jpg as the final result of your processing you will have to
> degrade to 8 bits at that point (keeping the file with the 16-bit colour depth
> from which the jpg was generated (in the same way that you work with xcf files
> in GIMP and just output a jpg at the end)).
>
> As you surmise the 24-bit colour relates to 3 channels, each of 8-bits.
>
> --
> programmer_ceds (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread elelont2
>I will try to use the tif. But could you try to answer this as well:
>
>If the original CR2 (RAW) file s sharp as nails (looks exactly the
>same as camera generated JPG) then how can the UFRaw generated picture
>be less sharp than the original RAW file?

I tried the tiff format but it does not seems to make a lot of sense with Gimp.

Gimp cannot handle 16-bit tiff images and i lose a lot that extra information
from the 14-bit RAW file.

Or am i missing something here?


Also, why does my windows show that the jpg files are 24bit - should they not be
8bit? Or is it 8 bit per channel * 3?

-- 
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread programmer_ceds
>I tried the tiff format but it does not seems to make a lot of sense
>with Gimp.
>
>Gimp cannot handle 16-bit tiff images and i lose a lot that extra
>information from the 14-bit RAW file.
>
>Or am i missing something here?
>
>
>Also, why does my windows show that the jpg files are 24bit - should
>they not be 8bit? Or is it 8 bit per channel * 3?

The current release version of GIMP (2.8.x) will only operate in 8-bit colour
depth. The next version of GIMP is said to handle 8, 16 or 32-bits colour depth
(I only say "is said to" because I haven't tried it). You would therefore have
to export an 8-bit tif from UFRaw for further processing in GIMP, or use the
development version of GIMP (2.9.x) which is not recommended for 'important'
work.

If you want to work in more than 8 bits until any final conversion to jpg you
have, at least, the following two alternatives -  use Photoshop/CS (which I
don't have) or process your raw files in something like RawTherapee (available
for Windows, Linux and Mac) or darktable (Linux and Mac only) - both of these
programs are open source and available for free.

I stand to be corrected on this but there is no 16-bit jpg format - so if you
want to produce a jpg as the final result of your processing you will have to
degrade to 8 bits at that point (keeping the file with the 16-bit colour depth
from which the jpg was generated (in the same way that you work with xcf files
in GIMP and just output a jpg at the end)).

As you surmise the 24-bit colour relates to 3 channels, each of 8-bits.

-- 
programmer_ceds (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread programmer_ceds
>I will try to use the tif. But could you try to answer this as well:
>
>If the original CR2 (RAW) file s sharp as nails (looks exactly the
>same as camera generated JPG) then how can the UFRaw generated picture
>be less sharp than the original RAW file?
I believe that the CR2 files contain not only the raw image data but also a jpg
thumbnail - at a guess the thumbnail may be sharpened (in camera) and it is
probably the thumbnail that Irfanview is showing you.

The point with raw files is that you (in theory) get (something close to) the
raw sensor data which you can then process with a different set of
parameters/controls to those used by the camera - this includes sharpening.

Try loading the image into RawTherapee where you can turn the sharpening on or
off - when turned off I would expect you to see a similar level of blurring to
that produced by UFRaw (which has no sharpening feature).

-- 
programmer_ceds (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread programmer_ceds
>Please see the attached images in my fist post.

If it is just the blurry nature of the UFRaw jpg then the answer is in your
original post - no sharpening has been applied, so you might expect it to be
blurry.

Have you tried processing the image with UFRaw but saving it in tif format, then
using something like Unsharp Mask 2 V0.12 in GIMP to provide the required level
of sharpening?

(Have UFRaw output lossless tif files, rather than jpgs which (usually) lose
image information and (can) introduce artefacts - only save the finished image
in jpg format.)

-- 
programmer_ceds (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread elelont2
>If it is just the blurry nature of the UFRaw jpg then the answer is in
>your original post - no sharpening has been applied, so you might
>expect it to be blurry.
>
>Have you tried processing the image with UFRaw but saving it in tif
>format, then using something like Unsharp Mask 2 V0.12 in GIMP to
>provide the required level of sharpening?
>
>(Have UFRaw output lossless tif files, rather than jpgs which
>(usually) lose image information and (can) introduce artefacts - only
>save the finished image in jpg format.)


I will try to use the tif. But could you try to answer this as well:

If the original CR2 (RAW) file s sharp as nails (looks exactly the same as
camera generated JPG) then how can the UFRaw generated picture be less sharp
than the original RAW file?

-- 
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-26 Thread elelont2
>Shouldn't we have seen some sample images and know the UFRaw settings
>in
>order to judge that?

Please see the attached images in my fist post.

-- 
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-25 Thread Michael Schumacher


On 08/25/2015 04:56 PM, programmer_ceds wrote:

>> What could cause UFRAW to mess up the images? Am i doing something
>> wrong or is it just crap?
> 
> I don't think that UFRaw has messed up your image - it is simply that UFRaw
> doesn't have a sharpening option whereas your camera is sharpening the jpeg
> (quite strongly) in camera.

Shouldn't we have seen some sample images and know the UFRaw settings in
order to judge that?


-- 
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-25 Thread elelont2
I tried to use UFRaw to convert my RAW files to jpg.

The problem is that the exported files are very blurry. The camera created jpg
files are nice and sharp.

If i view the RAW file with IrfanView then this is sharp too.

Denoise is set to 0, and JPG comp level is at 100. There does not seem to be a
sharpen option.

What could cause UFRAW to mess up the images? Am i doing something wrong or is
it just crap?




Attachments:
* http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/211/original/5D3_5866__-_Copy.JPG
* http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/212/original/5D3_5866_U_-_Copy.JPG

-- 
elelont2 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRAW creates blurry images

2015-08-25 Thread programmer_ceds
>I tried to use UFRaw to convert my RAW files to jpg.
>
>The problem is that the exported files are very blurry. The camera
>created jpg files are nice and sharp.
>
>If i view the RAW file with IrfanView then this is sharp too.
>
>Denoise is set to 0, and JPG comp level is at 100. There does not seem
>to be a sharpen option.
>
>What could cause UFRAW to mess up the images? Am i doing something
>wrong or is it just crap?

I don't think that UFRaw has messed up your image - it is simply that UFRaw
doesn't have a sharpening option whereas your camera is sharpening the jpeg
(quite strongly) in camera.

If you use UFRaw you have to accept that you need to sharpen in GIMP afterwards
(I normally use the Unsharp Mask 2 V0.12 plug-in for this).

Alternatively use Darktable, RawTherapee or, if you have a Fuji camera, S7raw.

Also note that UFRaw is giving you slightly more information at the edges of the
image (more pixels in both dimensions) than the camera jpg.

-- 
programmer_ceds (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Maurizio Loreti  [07-10-14 12:58]:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan 
> wrote:
> 
> > AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
> > there is no "element !" in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
> > grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no "html" appearing in
> > *any* xml file.
> >
> 
> About that you are right; I got the files using a "wget
> http://URL/slr-canon.xml"; and wget got all the data of the code frame.  My
> fault.
> 
> HOWEVER, downloading the files correctly, GIMP and ufraw both "barf" again;
> the first line reads  and is not accepted: the
> old files begin with a plain "".  See, when you say
> 
> > err, xml = xm
> 
> you are not right: the _format_ of the xml file has changed, indeed, as I
> said.  But the change now is straightforward.

That is possible, but in this case I believe not.

Why don't you edit the version line and make it what you believe
gimp/ufraw desire and try again?  You do want it to work???

And a grep for "version" of my lensfun-data-0.2.8-9.1.noarch install
reveals nill.  I believe 2.8 is the latest from sf and 2.8-9.1 is the
latest on openSUSE which I run.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Akkana Peck
Maurizio Loreti writes:
> I have tried do download the last versions from the lensfun distribution, now 
> hosted on sourceforge; under the URL 
> http://sourceforge.net/p/lensfun/code/ci/master/tree/data/db/ there are three 
> files canon-related, named compact-canon.xml, slr-canon.xml and mil-canon.xml.

Patrick Shanahan writes:
> AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
> there is no "element !" in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
> grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no "html" appearing in
> *any* xml file.

Could this be because of Sourceforge's charming habit of giving you
an HTML download page when you click on Download for a file, instead
of taking you straight to the file you asked for? I've downloaded
HTML files more than once, because I chose "Save link as" instead of
remembering that with sourceforge, you have to click, view the
download page and only then can you "Save as". Always check files
after you download them to make sure you got the file you thought
you were getting.

...Akkana
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Maurizio Loreti
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan 
wrote:

> AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
> there is no "element !" in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
> grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no "html" appearing in
> *any* xml file.
>

About that you are right; I got the files using a "wget
http://URL/slr-canon.xml"; and wget got all the data of the code frame.  My
fault.

HOWEVER, downloading the files correctly, GIMP and ufraw both "barf" again;
the first line reads  and is not accepted: the
old files begin with a plain "".  See, when you say

> err, xml = xm

you are not right: the _format_ of the xml file has changed, indeed, as I
said.  But the change now is straightforward.

-- 
(@_  |
//\  | Maurizio Loreti - Fisico in pensione, nonno felice di
V_/_ | due nipotini, vagabondo e fotografo a tempo perso...
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Maurizio Loreti  [07-10-14 09:32]:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan 
> wrote:
> 
> > You don't have to, just replace the "compact-canon.xml" and/or
> > "slr-canon.xml" files with the one that contains the information you need.
> >
> 
> *As I said*, replacing these files don't work; their xml format is
> different.
> 
> If I replace the files, there will be no diagnostic in the terminal where I
> start GIMP; but there will be NO Canon cameras and NO Canon objectives at
> all available for ufraw into GIMP.
> 
> Copying the same new files in the ufraw tree makes ufraw barf with the
> diagnostic "/opt/local/share/lensfun/compact-canon.xml:22:61: Unknown
> element !" and several others similar.  Yes, I could "edit the
> current files adding the relevant information", but if the lensfun file
> format has changed this 1) requires actions from the ufraw and the GIMP
> team; and 2) for me, merging the information from the new files into the
> old ones, if they obey a different syntax, could be a nightmare.

err, xml = xml, but editing by hand should be "no big thing".  

AND, the "barf" you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
there is no "element !" in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no "html" appearing in
*any* xml file.

*As I said*
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Maurizio Loreti
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan 
wrote:

> You don't have to, just replace the "compact-canon.xml" and/or
> "slr-canon.xml" files with the one that contains the information you need.
>

*As I said*, replacing these files don't work; their xml format is
different.

If I replace the files, there will be no diagnostic in the terminal where I
start GIMP; but there will be NO Canon cameras and NO Canon objectives at
all available for ufraw into GIMP.

Copying the same new files in the ufraw tree makes ufraw barf with the
diagnostic "/opt/local/share/lensfun/compact-canon.xml:22:61: Unknown
element !" and several others similar.  Yes, I could "edit the
current files adding the relevant information", but if the lensfun file
format has changed this 1) requires actions from the ufraw and the GIMP
team; and 2) for me, merging the information from the new files into the
old ones, if they obey a different syntax, could be a nightmare.

-- 
(@_  |
//\  | Maurizio Loreti - Retired physicist, happy grandfather
V_/_ | of two grandsons, wanderer and amateur photographer...
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Maurizio Loreti  [07-10-14 04:37]:
 [...]
> I have problems with the "lensfun" corrections to my photo pictures; I
> am not sure if this is related to GIMP itself, or to the Mac port I am
> using.
> 
> What happens is:
> 
> if I open a Canon RAW image (a CR2 file), GIMP recalls the "ufraw"
> plugin window; in the third tab ("Lens Correction"), ufraw does not know
> my camera Canon 6D, nor my other camera Canon Powershot G15, nor my lens
> Canon 24-70 EF L II (note the "II"), nor other lenses I have.
> If I open a Canon JPG image, the plugin GIMP-Lensfun v0.2.3 (Filters ->
> Enhance -> GIMP-Lensfun, inserted I think in the distribution by skl)
> does not know the same cameras and objectives.
> 
> The lensfun correction files are shipped by skl in the directory
> /Applications/Gimp.app/Contents/Resources/share/lensfun/ , and are named
> compact-canon.xml and slr-canon.xml.
> 
> I have tried do download the last versions from the lensfun
> distribution, now hosted on sourceforge; under the URL
> http://sourceforge.net/p/lensfun/code/ci/master/tree/data/db/ there are
> three files canon-related, named compact-canon.xml, slr-canon.xml and
> mil-canon.xml.  Just copying the first two files, or all three, on my
> GIMP tree, makes GIMP choke on the format of these files - both for RAW
> images and for JPG images; probably the xml file format has changed with
> the time.
> 
> QUESTION: how can I upgrade GIMP so that it will use modern and complete
> lensfun files?

You don't have to, just replace the "compact-canon.xml" and/or
"slr-canon.xml" files with the one that contains the information you need. 
Or just edit the current files adding the relevant information.  I use
darktable rather than gimp for raw processing and had to do that when I
upgraded my D200 to D7100.  And there is still missing lenses in the
lensfun database.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

2014-07-10 Thread Maurizio Loreti
Hello, list -
I am a satisfied GIMP user, and I am using the skl's "Mac on OS X" 2.8.10p2 
release running under OS X 10.9.4.

I have problems with the "lensfun" corrections to my photo pictures; I am not 
sure if this is related to GIMP itself, or to the Mac port I am using.

What happens is:

if I open a Canon RAW image (a CR2 file), GIMP recalls the "ufraw" plugin 
window; in the third tab ("Lens Correction"), ufraw does not know my camera 
Canon 6D, nor my other camera Canon Powershot G15, nor my lens Canon 24-70 EF L 
II (note the "II"), nor other lenses I have.
If I open a Canon JPG image, the plugin GIMP-Lensfun v0.2.3 (Filters -> Enhance 
-> GIMP-Lensfun, inserted I think in the distribution by skl) does not know the 
same cameras and objectives.

The lensfun correction files are shipped by skl in the directory 
/Applications/Gimp.app/Contents/Resources/share/lensfun/ , and are named 
compact-canon.xml and slr-canon.xml.

I have tried do download the last versions from the lensfun distribution, now 
hosted on sourceforge; under the URL 
http://sourceforge.net/p/lensfun/code/ci/master/tree/data/db/ there are three 
files canon-related, named compact-canon.xml, slr-canon.xml and mil-canon.xml.  
Just copying the first two files, or all three, on my GIMP tree, makes GIMP 
choke on the format of these files - both for RAW images and for JPG images; 
probably the xml file format has changed with the time.

QUESTION: how can I upgrade GIMP so that it will use modern and complete 
lensfun files?

-- 
(@_  |
//\  | Maurizio Loreti - Fisico in pensione, nonno felice di
V_/_ | due nipotini, vagabondo e fotografo a tempo perso...






___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

2014-02-23 Thread Partha Bagchi
Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.

Hope this helps.
Partha



On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Liam R E Quin  wrote:

> On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 17:51 +0100, EGoldman wrote:
> > I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to
> open...Please
> > help :(
>
> Is this on the Mac? on Linux? (which distribution exactly?) on Microsoft
> Windows (which version? XP? 7?) Which version of gimp exactly? Where did
> you get it?
>
> How did you install ufraw? How did you install gimp?
>
> Your gimp crashes when you attempt to open what exactly? A raw image? Or
> when you try to start gimp? Are there any messages if you run gimp from
> a terminal?
>
> What happened when you uninstalled ufraw?
>
> There are literally tens of thousands of possible reasons why you might
> be having problems, so rather than list them all we need some help in
> narrowing down and reducing the range of possibilities.
>
> Best,
>
> Liam
>
> --
> Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
> Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
>
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

2014-02-23 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 17:51 +0100, EGoldman wrote:
> I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to open...Please
> help :(

Is this on the Mac? on Linux? (which distribution exactly?) on Microsoft
Windows (which version? XP? 7?) Which version of gimp exactly? Where did
you get it?

How did you install ufraw? How did you install gimp?

Your gimp crashes when you attempt to open what exactly? A raw image? Or
when you try to start gimp? Are there any messages if you run gimp from
a terminal?

What happened when you uninstalled ufraw?

There are literally tens of thousands of possible reasons why you might
be having problems, so rather than list them all we need some help in
narrowing down and reducing the range of possibilities.

Best,

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

2014-02-23 Thread scl

Hi,

without knowing more about the GIMP version, the operating system,
your camera model and and the UFRaw version you use it's hard to give
an advice.
At least the Ufraw GIMP plug-in is known to be troublesome mostly on
Windows, see http://registry.gimp.org/node/31 and
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;order=Last%20Changed;short_desc=ufraw;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr;classification=Other;product=GIMP

Kind regards,

Sven


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

2014-02-23 Thread EGoldman
I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to open...Please
help :(

-- 
EGoldman (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw

2013-03-15 Thread rmagers

When in UFRaw and clicking the "Send Image to Gimp" icon in the lower right
corrner of the screen, I get the following error message.

Error Activating GIMP. Failed to execute  helper program (Invalid Argument).

Need help resolving this error.

Thanks,

Richard

-- 
rmagers (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-30 Thread Ebizjoey
>Maybe I'll seem a bit stupid as I'm not sure whether I got it right,
>but as far as I understand, the advice was to copy the images to your
>hard drive instead of trying to process them right on the card (or in
>your camera). Just create a folder and copy via right-click menu, or
>select the files and hit Ctrl+C (this is a global hot-key for
>copying), change to the folder on your HDD where you want the files
>and hit Ctrl+V, or open two explorer windows next to each other and
>drag-n-drop. Try to open the files and see if the problem is still
>there.
>
>If this really fixes the problem, then it might be a good idea to try
>and replace the card -- it can be faulty.
>
>Hope that this will help and sorry if I told some obvious things.
>
>Good luck!
>Boris
>
>On 30 ноября 2012 09:05:16 Ebizjoey wrote:
Thanks Boris,
that is what I needed some detail on how to do that, I would make fun of myself
with old age jokes but
will get busy instead haha, thank you very much both of you! BTW, I did
understand your instructions and it worked.

-- 
Ebizjoey (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-30 Thread Boris Kukushkin
Maybe I'll seem a bit stupid as I'm not sure whether I got it right, but as far 
as I understand, the advice was to copy the images to your hard drive instead 
of trying to process them right on the card (or in your camera). Just create a 
folder and copy via right-click menu, or select the files and hit Ctrl+C (this 
is a global hot-key for copying), change to the folder on your HDD where you 
want the files and hit Ctrl+V, or open two explorer windows next to each other 
and drag-n-drop. Try to open the files and see if the problem is still there. 

If this really fixes the problem, then it might be a good idea to try and 
replace the card -- it can be faulty. 

Hope that this will help and sorry if I told some obvious things.

Good luck!
Boris

On 30 ноября 2012 09:05:16 Ebizjoey wrote:
> >Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
> >before working on them.
> >
> >You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow cards or faulty
> >camera connections somtimes.
> >
> >Liam
> 
> 
> Thanks Liam, how would one do that? I see the card in "computer" (vista) but 
> if
> I hit copy off a right click nothing happens, if you have time please advice
> (older and new to computers) and let me thank you now as it is late here in
> Cleveland OH and I am going to get some sleep now - so thank you much.
> 

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-30 Thread Ebizjoey
>Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
>before working on them.
>
>You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow cards or faulty
>camera connections somtimes.
>
>Liam


Thanks Liam, how would one do that? I see the card in "computer" (vista) but if
I hit copy off a right click nothing happens, if you have time please advice
(older and new to computers) and let me thank you now as it is late here in
Cleveland OH and I am going to get some sleep now - so thank you much.

-- 
Ebizjoey (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-29 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0100, Ebizjoey wrote:
> [...] it is intermittent, like yesterday it was doing it and
> today it is not, same files.

Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
before working on them.

You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow cards or faulty
camera connections somtimes.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-29 Thread Ebizjoey
>* Ebizjoey  [11-29-12 13:18]:
>I have seen this, when the photo did not get written completely to the
>card.  But this happens before you get to the computer...
>Open one of the troubled files with geeqie or xv and see if the file
>has
>problems before ufraw presents it to gimp.  Or see if you can see the
>complete file in ufraw.
>
>If you see the complete file in ufraw, export it and open the
>resulting
>file with gimp.  See if you still have the problem.

Thanks Patrick, thing is it is intermittent, like yesterday it was doing it and
today it is not, same files. Frustrating because you know when you want to work
you want to work:) I am not always in the mood to work.

-- 
Ebizjoey (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-29 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Ebizjoey  [11-29-12 13:18]:

> I shoot in raw so I open from there, problem is that frequently the file
> will open good the first 2/3's (two thirds from top to bottom) and than
> have a line, and the rest is dark and does not show up in Gimp (this
> darkened part).

I have seen this, when the photo did not get written completely to the
card.  But this happens before you get to the computer...
 
> I am not real knowledgeable so any advice would be appreciated, thank
> you.
> 
> Wow, UFRaw seems moody, I wanted to do a screenshot to attach and today
> it works good.  This seems to happen more in portrait up down camera
> vertical than landscape horizontal shots.  You know how time is, want it
> to work when I am full of energy to work, thanks again.

Open one of the troubled files with geeqie or xv and see if the file has
problems before ufraw presents it to gimp.  Or see if you can see the
complete file in ufraw.

If you see the complete file in ufraw, export it and open the resulting
file with gimp.  See if you still have the problem.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

2012-11-29 Thread Ebizjoey
I shoot in raw so I open from there, problem is that frequently the file will
open good the first 2/3's (two thirds from top to bottom) and than have a line,
and the rest is dark and does not show up in Gimp (this darkened part).

I am not real knowledgeable so any advice would be appreciated, thank you.

Wow, UFRaw seems moody, I wanted to do a screenshot to attach and today it works
good. This seems to happen more in portrait up down camera vertical than
landscape horizontal shots. You know how time is, want it to work when I am full
of energy to work, thanks again.

-- 
Ebizjoey (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

2012-03-15 Thread Bettina
Thank you very much!

Just for those who might have similar problems:

I followed this advice:

http://registry.gimp.org/node/31

All the missing dll's were already present in the Gimp directories I had
 previously installed. I had to copy them from program
files\gimp2\bin\xx.dll to program files\ufraw\bin\xx.dll

(from Pastingal)

and then reinstalled ufraw. now it works!

oh yeah!



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Shanahan 
Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
Datum: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:40:34 -0400
An: gimp-users 
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

>* Bettina  [03-15-12 05:17]:
>> of course I was searching. but I couldn't find any entry
>> with that problem.
>> but anyway, thank you for your hint.
>> 
>> 
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Patrick Shanahan 
>> Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
>> Datum: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
>> An: gimp-users 
>> Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw
>> 
>> >* Bettina  [03-14-12 05:09]:
>> >> I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can
>>help:
>> >> 
>> >> since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
>> >> windows 7
>> >> 
>> >> Error message:
>> >> The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
>> >> Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem
>> >> 
>> >> I reinstalled without success.
>> >
>> >I have seen several posts related to your condition recently.  A
>>search of
>> >the recent archives will provide you a solution.
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG #
>>US1244711
>> >http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album:
>>http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
>> >http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community
>>Member
>> >Registered Linux User #207535@
>>http://linuxcounter.net
>> >___
>> >gimp-user-list mailing list
>> >gimp-user-list@gnome.org
>> >http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> gimp-user-list mailing list
>> gimp-user-list@gnome.org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
>
>
>The "jist" of the posts was that a *.dll file, probably the one you cited
>existed in two places and the wrong one was being found first.  You might
>try (and I am relying on memory, old memory) searching for
>"ligqdk-win32*.dll" and renaming *one* and trying ufraw.  If that does not
>work, change the name back to the original name and rename the other.
>
>gud luk,
>-- 
>(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
>http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
>http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
>Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
>___
>gimp-user-list mailing list
>gimp-user-list@gnome.org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
>


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

2012-03-15 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Bettina  [03-15-12 05:17]:
> of course I was searching. but I couldn't find any entry
> with that problem.
> but anyway, thank you for your hint.
> 
> 
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Patrick Shanahan 
> Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
> Datum: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
> An: gimp-users 
> Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw
> 
> >* Bettina  [03-14-12 05:09]:
> >> I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
> >> 
> >> since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
> >> windows 7
> >> 
> >> Error message:
> >> The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
> >> Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem
> >> 
> >> I reinstalled without success.
> >
> >I have seen several posts related to your condition recently.  A search of
> >the recent archives will provide you a solution.
> >
> >-- 
> >(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
> >http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
> >http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
> >Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
> >___
> >gimp-user-list mailing list
> >gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> >http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> 
> 
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


The "jist" of the posts was that a *.dll file, probably the one you cited
existed in two places and the wrong one was being found first.  You might
try (and I am relying on memory, old memory) searching for
"ligqdk-win32*.dll" and renaming *one* and trying ufraw.  If that does not
work, change the name back to the original name and rename the other.

gud luk,
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

2012-03-15 Thread Bettina
of course I was searching. but I couldn't find any entry
with that problem.
but anyway, thank you for your hint.


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Shanahan 
Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
Datum: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
An: gimp-users 
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

>* Bettina  [03-14-12 05:09]:
>> I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
>> 
>> since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
>> windows 7
>> 
>> Error message:
>> The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
>> Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem
>> 
>> I reinstalled without success.
>
>I have seen several posts related to your condition recently.  A search of
>the recent archives will provide you a solution.
>
>-- 
>(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
>http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
>http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
>Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
>___
>gimp-user-list mailing list
>gimp-user-list@gnome.org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

2012-03-14 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Bettina  [03-14-12 05:09]:
> I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
> 
> since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
> windows 7
> 
> Error message:
> The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
> Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem
> 
> I reinstalled without success.

I have seen several posts related to your condition recently.  A search of
the recent archives will provide you a solution.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw

2012-03-14 Thread Bettina
Hello,

I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:

since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
windows 7

Error message:
The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem

I reinstalled without success.

Any help is very appreciated.

Thank you!
bettina


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list



Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw vs Darktable

2011-12-21 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:13 AM, kevin wrote:
> In another thread a person was advised to use Darktable to process RAW images.
>
> I currently use UFRaw so: What advantages does Darktable have over UFRaw?

http://www.darktable.org/features/, eh? ;-)

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] UFRaw vs Darktable

2011-12-21 Thread kevin
In another thread a person was advised to use Darktable to process RAW images.

I currently use UFRaw so: What advantages does Darktable have over UFRaw?

Cheers,
Kev
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list