RE: Pentax Gallery
I feel the same way about competitions, Cotty. Funny thing, isn't it? People who buy photographs (I sell more than I submit for competitions) also base their decisions on subjective assessments. So, I try to make photographs that I like. That's an amateurs privilege. What I like, even changes from time to time. At the moment I like quite plain photographs, emperically recordings. Like this: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/263007123/in/set-72157594316648589/ Of couse this would not be submisable anywhere :-) BTW: I realized how many nice photographs I did with my Tokina 2.6-2.8 AT-X 28-70mm - not submitable for the Pentax Gallery. Like this: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/54533268/ Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty Sendt: 16. marts 2007 23:25 Til: pentax list Emne: Re: Pentax Gallery On 16/3/07, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed: It actually is beginning to piss me off a little bit. That's why I don't enter photo contests, nor submit to galleries based on subjective judgement. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.12/724 - Release Date: 03/16/2007 12:12 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.12/724 - Release Date: 03/16/2007 12:12 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, William Robb wrote: I downloaded a chart that some guy with a D70 made. It's printed off on an 8.5x11 sheet of paper. I used the 31mm, at about a 2 or so foot range. I haven't checked focus with any other lenses yet, that will be my project for tomorrow. There have been some criticism about the above chart using a 45 degree angle method. I have no idea whether those criticism were valid, and some claim that this would introduce errors and force FF or BF. Another chart http://www.geocities.jp/pen_pen_pentax/focus/ was claimed to be better as the focus target was vertical. I would also like to know if these test charts were better or should we use real life objects. Another word of caution is the lighting. Users have noticed variation whether you are using daylight or tungsten light. -- --Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence -- --Tungsten T3 Enhanced DIA KeyboardNokia Ringtone Convertor-- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Rusian lenses
There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a K10D-on-a-budget system: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives? - Make sure it will fit under the overhanging rtf. As I recall, there was some uncertainty about that when the *ist D came out. Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:27:24 -0400 (EDT), Lawrence Kwan wrote On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, William Robb wrote: I downloaded a chart that some guy with a D70 made. It's printed off on an 8.5x11 sheet of paper. I used the 31mm, at about a 2 or so foot range. I haven't checked focus with any other lenses yet, that will be my project for tomorrow. There have been some criticism about the above chart using a 45 degree angle method. I have no idea whether those criticism were valid, and some claim that this would introduce errors and force FF or BF. Another chart http://www.geocities.jp/pen_pen_pentax/focus/ was claimed to be better as the focus target was vertical. I would also like to know if these test charts were better or should we use real life objects. Another word of caution is the lighting. Users have noticed variation whether you are using daylight or tungsten light. -- --Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence -- --Tungsten T3 Enhanced DIA KeyboardNokia Ringtone Convertor-- Ah, now that's the chart I have that I mistakenly thought William was using. I'm very curious now, focus shifting between 14mm and 31mm, I think my K10D may get seriously interfered with in the not to distant future. John The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Driving to GFM
How dare you! English swill is the envy of the civilised world. -- Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Norm Baugher Sent: 17 March 2007 01:30 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Driving to GFM Dave, how could you find that funny, so insensitive. You are such a bastard.. Brasilian coffee = beer (please, not that English swill). Norm David J Brooks wrote: If you wer;nt so busy pissing Cotty off, you could have called that guy instead. LOL Dave On 3/16/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few years back when I was living in Germany, some guy in his Mercedes drove into the river, the Sat Nav didn't show that the bridge was out due to construction Norm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Driving to GFM
Alcohol drugs do a pretty good job of it -- Bob I guess nothing takes the place of common sense and awareness. ;] -P Norm Baugher wrote: A few years back when I was living in Germany, some guy in his Mercedes drove into the river, the Sat Nav didn't show that the bridge was out due to construction Norm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bags Again
I ordered a black Domke J-803 (nylon) and I was sent a black F-803 (canvas) by mistake. My immediate reaction was to send it back, but it's sorta growing on me. The canvas is much better quality than I have previously seen. Ballistic nylon or canvas? What's your choice? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: SD cards
You lucky man, John :) OCZ is not very well known (AFAIK) for products like memory cards but they're defenitely well known for their overlocked memory modules. They are very well regarded. 2007/3/17, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My girlfriend works for OCZ Technology, an up-and-coming high-performance memory manufacturer in the Silicon Valley. She got me a couple OCZ 150X 2gb SD cards, and I love them. So fast! Very reliable thus far, and I've not heard any negative words about OCZ products since I first heard of them. OCZ Technology makes some pretty cool stuff, and not just memory products. I've been getting to like them quite a bit. As far as what's crap, stay away from low-end SanDisk cards. Back when I was doing a lot of memory card file recoveries for people at my camera shop job, those cheapass cards were what I saw most often. Low-end Lexar cards are a little better, but not much. If you must buy SanDisk or Lexar, go for their high-end stuff. You'll pay more, but the reliability is worth it. John -- http://www.neovenator.com http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
William, I did not follow the whole thread but some at DpReview managed to hack the header of the firmware allowing one to downgrade from 1.11 to 1.10 (in fact 1.10 with hacked header) and then official 1.10 firmware. One may like or dislike the method but thought I should mention the possibility. I did sent that to the list a couple days ago but maybe it didn't make it to the list. -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO:Starling - with the K10D Tamron SP 500 F8 mirror lens
Well not that it is real winter... 15°C in march really it not winter. Go figure ... I might try my old Chinon 300/5.6 but I expect it to be pretty... forgettable ;) I never thought about mirror lens and architecure, I might try that too. Thanks for those interesting ideas, Markus. BTW, where are you from, in Switzerland ? -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Bags Again
I would say it depends on what you plan to use it for. If I were to use it as a photo bag I would prefer the canvas version for reasons previously given. On the other hand, when I think about replacing my canvas F-802 I usually think of buying a ballistic nylon one. That's because I use it for work - the ballistic nylon looks more business-like, and I don't think it would get so worn, faded and mellow as the canvas. For business purposes the canvas bag makes you look like a down-at-heel bum; for photographic purposes it makes you look like a grizzled veteran war photographer. -- Bob Some people would sooner die than think. In fact they do Bertand Russell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cotty Sent: 17 March 2007 09:45 To: pentax list Subject: Bags Again I ordered a black Domke J-803 (nylon) and I was sent a black F-803 (canvas) by mistake. My immediate reaction was to send it back, but it's sorta growing on me. The canvas is much better quality than I have previously seen. Ballistic nylon or canvas? What's your choice? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Rusian lenses
Sandy Harris escribió: There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a K10D-on-a-budget system: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives? I had one of those, but used it only on film cameras. It is a well made, heavy and big lens. It doesn't have a front filter thread (the front side of the lens is about 82 mm. wide, if I recall correctly), and it comes with four small filters which are screwed at the back side of the lens. It needs to have one of those filters in place as it is part of the optical formula. It is multicoated, and, although it isn't as flare resistant as a Pentax SMC lens, it is better than the third party wide angle lenses I have used (Tokina or Sigma). In some film cameras, the filters I have mentioned in the first paragraph interfere with the mirror swing, but I think it isn't an issue with the APS-C DSLRs because they have a smaller mirror, but I don't know for sure because I haven't used the lens on a DSLR. It is a fast lens, but it isn't particularly sharp until f:5.6. It shows noticeable CA on film on the extreme borders of the frame. Some Russian and Ukrainian sellers sell that lens for about 100 US dollars on Ebay (I paid 90 dollars plus 10 dollars shipping expenses 5 or 6 years ago). Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Retoucing Comments
I think you do a decent job on the retouching. I would reduce the saturation a wee bit and push the middle of the RGB curve up a bit to brighten midrange tones without losing contrast. But the real problem here is that her eye is half closed. Is this a crop? I don't like the one-eyed framing. On Mar 16, 2007, at 11:31 PM, David Savage wrote: G'day All, A couple of weeks ago we had a building wide fire drill at work. There was a photographer there from the council or local paper taking snaps, and all my work mates egged me on to take his picture, which I did (BTW, He was shooting with a silver 350D with what looked like a 70-200 f2.8, ugly looking combination). While I was goofing around I took a picture of our office manager. I didn't use the VF, it was a point-the-camera-in-her-general-direction-and-fire kind of thing. Surprisingly it turned out sharp and, IMHO, quite well framed. Unsurprisingly it's not at all flattering (there is a reason why I don't post my portraits/candids :-). I sent her the original and she didn't like it.. So I've been having a go at some of that heavy handed post processing stuff (~130kb): http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_4_2.jpg K10D, FA 50mm f1.4, f4.5 @ 1/800 +0.3EV, ISO 400 ...here's a side by side before-after comparison (~100kb): http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_before- after.jpg I realise it looks fake, but short of a make-up artist re shooting in a studio there's not much else I can do. What do you reckon? Has it improved a mediocre shot, or just blurred and over saturated it? :-) Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Retoucing Comments
G'day Paul, Yeah, I did get a bit carried away with the saturation, I just tried the curves adjustment and it does look much better. It's a full frame, unframed shot.. I tried opening the eye with the Bloat tool in the liquify filter, and it kinda worked, but I didn't do it in this version. This is a simple case of trying to Phix-with-Photoshop a very unflattering photo :-) Thanks for looking your comments. Cheers, Dave On 3/17/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you do a decent job on the retouching. I would reduce the saturation a wee bit and push the middle of the RGB curve up a bit to brighten midrange tones without losing contrast. But the real problem here is that her eye is half closed. Is this a crop? I don't like the one-eyed framing. On Mar 16, 2007, at 11:31 PM, David Savage wrote: http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_4_2.jpg http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_before-after.jpg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: PESO:Starling - with the K10D Tamron SP 500 F8 mirror lens
Hi Thibouille I live near Zurich in the german part of Switzerland. The compression of the 500mm can produce interesting effects IMHO. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thibouille Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 11:23 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO:Starling - with the K10D Tamron SP 500 F8 mirror lens Well not that it is real winter... 15°C in march really it not winter. Go figure ... I might try my old Chinon 300/5.6 but I expect it to be pretty... forgettable ;) I never thought about mirror lens and architecure, I might try that too. Thanks for those interesting ideas, Markus. BTW, where are you from, in Switzerland ? -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
Hi Bill, On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:59:22 -0600, William Robb wrote: Bravery overcame foolishness, and I decided to check how accurate my K10 was for focus accuracy. It turns out, not very. So, armed with the instructions and a focus chart I downloaded a while back, decided to adjust the camera. Now my camera's AF focuses better. Interestingly, I could see no difference on the screen, but a big difference in the sharpness of the pictures. Did anyone else check their cameras? Not yet, need to invest some into it :-) Did it a year ago with the *istD, but no means of correcting then. It was off a little on the 50mm 1.4 and the FA* 85 ... And if so, what were your results? I'm thinking I won't upgrade my firmware on this camera, in order to maintain access to the debug mode. That is what I will do too ... Did you test with different lenses ? If so, was there a large spread in needed correction ? I would assume testing with fast glass is best ... Regards, JvW -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Bags Again
On 17/3/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: For business purposes the canvas bag makes you look like a down-at-heel bum; for photographic purposes it makes you look like a grizzled veteran war photographer. Well, one out of three isn't bad. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Pentax remote assistant form *stD works with the K10D
Hi Pentaxians good news, the free Pentax Remote assistant software works with the K10D. Connected via the USB cable you can fire your K10D from the computer. I just tested it, nice :-) greetings Markus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Bags Again
With regard to how the bag feels and is comfortable in use, I prefer the canvas. The differences between the two bags are the size of the main compartment (13x4x9 inch for the F-803 vs 13.5x4.5x10 inch for the J-803), a separate laptop pocket, and the fact that the J-803 has a detachable shoulder strap where the F-803 strap is sewn in. http://www.tiffen.com/displayproduct.html? tablename=domkeitemnum=701-J83 http://www.tiffen.com/displayproduct.html? tablename=domkeitemnum=701-83B That extra size (particularly the 4.5 depth) would be welcome to me for ease of getting camera in and out... the K10D with the Hakuba hand strap fitted is a bit of a squeeze in the F803. I don't know whether the laptop pocket will fit a PowerBook G4 or MacBook Pro 15 so I don't know how useful that is. G On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Cotty wrote: I ordered a black Domke J-803 (nylon) and I was sent a black F-803 (canvas) by mistake. My immediate reaction was to send it back, but it's sorta growing on me. The canvas is much better quality than I have previously seen. Ballistic nylon or canvas? What's your choice? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
- Original Message - From: Lawrence Kwan Subject: Re: K10 Debug Mode On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, William Robb wrote: I downloaded a chart that some guy with a D70 made. It's printed off on an 8.5x11 sheet of paper. I used the 31mm, at about a 2 or so foot range. I haven't checked focus with any other lenses yet, that will be my project for tomorrow. There have been some criticism about the above chart using a 45 degree angle method. I have no idea whether those criticism were valid, and some claim that this would introduce errors and force FF or BF. Another chart http://www.geocities.jp/pen_pen_pentax/focus/ was claimed to be better as the focus target was vertical. I would also like to know if these test charts were better or should we use real life objects. Another word of caution is the lighting. Users have noticed variation whether you are using daylight or tungsten light. I read the fellow's paper (for the life of me, I don't recall his name), and he took quite a bit of effort to debunk the naysayers. Pretty much, it came down to the camera not knowing or caring if the test chart is on an angle, since it is only being asked to focus on a discrete line on the page. I used diffuse daylight. If the light spectrum makes a difference, then one should run these sorts of tests in the light type used most often. My own thought on that is people who don't know how to run a test shouldn't be running tests. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
- Original Message - From: Thibouille Subject: Re: K10 Debug Mode William, I did not follow the whole thread but some at DpReview managed to hack the header of the firmware allowing one to downgrade from 1.11 to 1.10 (in fact 1.10 with hacked header) and then official 1.10 firmware. One may like or dislike the method but thought I should mention the possibility. I did sent that to the list a couple days ago but maybe it didn't make it to the list. I saw that, but decided that it wasn't for me. I won't upgrade to 1.11 until I see a pressing need to do so. I don't do trailing curtain sync or many multiple exposures, and iirc, that was the major fix in 1.11. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
- Original Message - From: John Whittingham Subject: Re: K10 Debug Mode Ah, now that's the chart I have that I mistakenly thought William was using. I'm very curious now, focus shifting between 14mm and 31mm, I think my K10D may get seriously interfered with in the not to distant future. Initially, I used the 31, and got it looking good, then switched to the 14, and discovered the error was still there, so I adjusted until the 14 was good, and restested the 31, which was also still good. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
For anyone interested, here is a link to the focus chart and instructions that I used. http://www.focustestchart.com/chart.html William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: K10 Debug Mode
- Original Message - From: Jan van Wijk Subject: Re: K10 Debug Mode I would assume testing with fast glass is best ... I'll be hauling the 50/1.4 out today William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: DST MS
I have the same problem on the PC but the Mac is ok. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Pentax remote assistant form *stD works with the K10D
Other than firing the shutter what else can it do. Do you have total remote access to the menus, can you switch modes(doubt that), etc? Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Driving to GFM
On 3/16/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, how could you find that funny, so insensitive. You are such a bastard.. Brasilian coffee = beer (please, not that English swill). Norm I like Frank Zappa, so take it from there. vbg Dave David J Brooks wrote: If you wer;nt so busy pissing Cotty off, you could have called that guy instead. LOL Dave On 3/16/07, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few years back when I was living in Germany, some guy in his Mercedes drove into the river, the Sat Nav didn't show that the bridge was out due to construction Norm Bob W wrote: Sat Nav over here is notorious for leading people up one way streets, across people's back gardens and through shops. I had a good argument a couple of years ago with some cretin who was putting too much trust in his sat nav and trying to drive down my street, which has a locked barrier at one end. He seemed to think that because his sat nav didn't show the barrier, he had a right to try and force it open to drive through. Cretin. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Windows shell extension to view thumbnails from PEFs
There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730 announcing a Windows Shell Extension that lets the standard Windows file browser know how to extract thumbnails from .PEFs (and from a plethora of other file types, including DNGs). If you would like to see thumbnails from your Pentax RAW files it might be worth giving this a try. I haven't tried it myself yet, but there are several favourable reviews in the discussion thread at the above link. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Retoucing Comments
In a message dated 3/16/2007 8:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_before-after.jpg I realise it looks fake, but short of a make-up artist re shooting in a studio there's not much else I can do. What do you reckon? Has it improved a mediocre shot, or just blurred and over saturated it? :-) Cheers, Dave === She'll probably like it blurred. But if you are going to do that, you have to blur the eyelid too, this way it looks funny. Marnie aka Doe ** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax remote assistant form *stD works with the K10D
Hi Walt I just tested if it fires the shutter. On www.photo.net they talk about an update coming for the K10D. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Walter Hamler Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 3:28 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Pentax remote assistant form *stD works with the K10D Other than firing the shutter what else can it do. Do you have total remote access to the menus, can you switch modes(doubt that), etc? Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Retoucing Comments
On 3/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 3/16/2007 8:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_before-after.jpg === She'll probably like it blurred. But if you are going to do that, you have to blur the eyelid too, this way it looks funny. Good point. I just went back and edited the blur mask, and your right it does look better. Thanks for looking. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Windows shell extension to view thumbnails from PEFs
On 3/17/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730 announcing a Windows Shell Extension that lets the standard Windows file browser know how to extract thumbnails from .PEFs (and from a plethora of other file types, including DNGs). If you would like to see thumbnails from your Pentax RAW files it might be worth giving this a try. I haven't tried it myself yet, but there are several favourable reviews in the discussion thread at the above link. Either I'm doing something wrong, or it doesn't like XP x64. It doesn't do anything for me. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Bags Again
I happen to like the canvas. It has enough heft to provide a bit of protection, but is not bulky like padded cases. Too bad I can not afford one. A point for those who do not know, Domke bags are intended as working bags, not storage bags. What is the difference? A storage bag is designed to hold and protect your whole kit. A working bag is intended to hold just what you are using on this assignment with easy access to everything. The key being easy access v. protection. -graywolf Cotty wrote: I ordered a black Domke J-803 (nylon) and I was sent a black F-803 (canvas) by mistake. My immediate reaction was to send it back, but it's sorta growing on me. The canvas is much better quality than I have previously seen. Ballistic nylon or canvas? What's your choice? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery Response
Markus Maurer wrote: Hi Mark I left them an email and had an artist code one day later. Since nearly all of my photos are made on film and with old equipment I miss a lot of M/A lenses and the complete Spotmatic/Takumar series in the lens/camera selection box. I hope they will add lenses at least and wrote them an email. thanks and greetings Markus __ Were the takumar's Pentax lenses? what I read was that you had to have shot the photos with pentax body and pentax lens ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery Response
Brian Walters wrote: Ann Just to clarify. You need to send the request for an Artist Code to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure if clicking on the Contact Us link on the Gallery website goes to the same people. It may, but if you don't get a response in 3-4 days (that's how long my code took), it might be worth trying again at the above address. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia --. (picking up Marnie's style of separating answer from original message :) Thanks, Brian I did send it to the contact us thing -- that was all I saw as a way to send something. sigh It has been a couple of days... but I don't have time to do any uploading there right now anyway :) ann Quoting ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]: David J Brooks wrote: You need to request the artist number Ann. Mine took a bout 24 hours. Dave Thats what I did... no response yet ann -- Click for free info on online degrees and make $150K/ year http://tags.bluebottle.com/fc/CAaCMPJnTIExSdBdGvF8KTqWrGvdD78y/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Driving to GFM (GPS systems)
Well, just outside of town here, my Tom Tom Navigator 5.0 software on the pocket pc tells me to take a sharp right in 80 yards. If I do that I drive into a mountain. The thing is that the road was under construction when the GPS van went through and there was a detour from one side of of the road to the other at that time that is long since gone. The road goes through a cut at that point so the software is asking me to drive through solid rock. I run into that a lot. The electronic maps are always five or more years out of date. That is the difference between the two routes Cotty was seeing to GFM from DC, the map software thinks 421 is still under construction while it has been complete for the past 3-4 years. Take out the 30 miles of slow old road and detours and the lowland route is almost exactly the same time and distance as the mountain route. Boone changed the center of their address grid 10+ years back, none of the electronic maps, and I have 4 different ones, show that change; hence it is impossible to find a location by address here. -graywolf Paul Sorenson wrote: I guess nothing takes the place of common sense and awareness. ;] -P Norm Baugher wrote: A few years back when I was living in Germany, some guy in his Mercedes drove into the river, the Sat Nav didn't show that the bridge was out due to construction Norm Bob W wrote: Sat Nav over here is notorious for leading people up one way streets, across people's back gardens and through shops. I had a good argument a couple of years ago with some cretin who was putting too much trust in his sat nav and trying to drive down my street, which has a locked barrier at one end. He seemed to think that because his sat nav didn't show the barrier, he had a right to try and force it open to drive through. Cretin. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Windows shell extension to view thumbnails from PEFs
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 12:28:55AM +0900, David Savage wrote: On 3/17/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730 announcing a Windows Shell Extension that lets the standard Windows file browser know how to extract thumbnails from .PEFs (and from a plethora of other file types, including DNGs). If you would like to see thumbnails from your Pentax RAW files it might be worth giving this a try. I haven't tried it myself yet, but there are several favourable reviews in the discussion thread at the above link. Either I'm doing something wrong, or it doesn't like XP x64. It doesn't do anything for me. From reading posts in the original thread you need to refresh the thumbnails if you install this extension after you've already viewed a folder containing PEFs/DNGs/etc. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO:K10D Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 test photos
Hi Pentaxians 3 test shots with the K10D and the non SMC Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 for you, handheld with SR on. In Zurich Wall paintings at the Fraumunster church, uncropped, auto contrast + sharpened in Photoshop, 1/15 F 2.8 (the colors of the wallpaintings have to be muted) http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/fraumuenster.jpg Row of chairs in the Fraumunster church. A dark but high contrast scene 1/30 F. 4.5 http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/chairs.jpg Finally a 1/3 at the side scropped and warmed photo (for the gold of the barometer): http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/zwicker.jpg Maybe the missing smc shows in bright light and not here but I'm quite happy with the results of such an old lens and wonder how good my M 35mm 3.5 will score next. hope my subjective testings are of any interest to you. greetings Markus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Gallery Response
Hi Ann I sent them an email and got the code one day later. Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens? greetings Markus -- I did send it to the contact us thing -- that was all I saw as a way to send something. sigh It has been a couple of days... but I don't have time to do any uploading there right now anyway :) ann Were the takumar's Pentax lenses? what I read was that you had to have shot the photos with pentax body and pentax lens ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: DST MS
Well, I decided to postpone things until fall. I just readjusted the time of my schedules for the next two weeks. I intensely dislike wasting time and money calling customer support, and figure that the software is broken if I have to do that. But when the problem is a thief's belief that everyone is a crook just like him, then I get truly pissed. Jobs and company are of the same ilk (Even more so which is why Apple uses a closed system). Those guys ripped off intellectual property and computer time left and right, now that they have the bucks they think everyone is doing it to them. Sorry for the sermon. My anger must be because I was around back then and didn't have the balls to steal my way to billions too. -graywolf Evan Hanson wrote: I have the same problem on the PC but the Mac is ok. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO:K10D Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 test photos
On 3/17/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3 test shots with the K10D and the non SMC Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 for you, handheld with SR on. I thought I was the only person on the list who has one of these kicking around. :-) I also have an A28/2.8, and if you put the two lenses next to each other, they're basically identical, except for the lens coatings. Your results are similar to mine with it, it's a nice sharp lens, though the flare suffers in bright light. -Mat -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: OT: Coffee Grinder
Two rocks work well. But you have to buy the name brand ones, the generic rocks are inferior. Doug Franklin wrote: Shel Belinkoff wrote: Thanks guys, but those machines are way more than I want or need. I've got a /really/ sharp machete. :-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Bags Again
On 17/3/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed: I happen to like the canvas. It has enough heft to provide a bit of protection, but is not bulky like padded cases. Interesting - and which is better - black or sand? -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Very old Hit film
David Savage wrote: On 3/16/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Savage wrote: At 11:59 AM 15/03/2007, ann sanfedele wrote: John -- of course when I read your subject line what passed through my mind first was - um - It happened one Night or the 39 Steps :) ann Me too, but the films were Apocalypse Now, American Graffiti Star Wars...you know...classics. g Dave Just a little younger than I am, are ya??? Just a little ;-) The line said VERY old film... I picked ones from the decade I was born in Yeah. Me too :-) Dave __ GRRR! ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO:K10D Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 test photos
I find it difficult to really determine how sharp the resolution/contrast is on web images, especially at only 700 or 800 pixels. They all looked good to me, but that doesn't necessarily put them in the same league as modern DA* lenses. :-) Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PSE 5.0 w/Vista
Now that I have the laptop operational with PSE5 I have been playing around some. I can't seem to find a way to change the screen brightness like I can on my XP desktop machine. Naturally the laptop is one of the new LCD screens, but don't they have controls somewhere?? Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1 The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors? Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
His opinion is as valid as my opinion, or yours. Just like his bellybutton is as valid as mine or yours! :-) Me thinks that all he has done is regurgitate what the industry visionaries out there are already spouting about the future of dslr cameras, and basically where the industry goes so goes P,N,C, et al. Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO: Harmony, duck couple
On my way to take pictures of a 17th century ship replica that is curently used for a movie-shoot, these two came by pretty close and quietly: http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=207 There are some more new images in the rest of the PESO gallery too: http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=8page=1 Regards, JvW -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Retoucing Comments
Paul Stenquist wrote: I think you do a decent job on the retouching. I would reduce the saturation a wee bit and push the middle of the RGB curve up a bit to brighten midrange tones without losing contrast. But the real problem here is that her eye is half closed. Is this a crop? I don't like the one-eyed framing. On Mar 16, 2007, at 11:31 PM, David Savage wrote: Well I bet she likes the second a bit better but the severe crop would be as likely a reason... It does look fake after retouching - it is a bitch to do that stuff... but you also changed her coloration. (noticed the lipstick changed color :) ) I agree with Paul, I dont like the framing either. She is a pretty woman and no amount of gausian blurr with bring back her whole face :) YOu are trying to be too artsy , David I think. ann G'day All, A couple of weeks ago we had a building wide fire drill at work. There was a photographer there from the council or local paper taking snaps, and all my work mates egged me on to take his picture, which I did (BTW, He was shooting with a silver 350D with what looked like a 70-200 f2.8, ugly looking combination). While I was goofing around I took a picture of our office manager. I didn't use the VF, it was a point-the-camera-in-her-general-direction-and-fire kind of thing. Surprisingly it turned out sharp and, IMHO, quite well framed. Unsurprisingly it's not at all flattering (there is a reason why I don't post my portraits/candids :-). I sent her the original and she didn't like it.. So I've been having a go at some of that heavy handed post processing stuff (~130kb): http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_4_2.jpg K10D, FA 50mm f1.4, f4.5 @ 1/800 +0.3EV, ISO 400 ...here's a side by side before-after comparison (~100kb): http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1300_before- after.jpg I realise it looks fake, but short of a make-up artist re shooting in a studio there's not much else I can do. What do you reckon? Has it improved a mediocre shot, or just blurred and over saturated it? :-) Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1 The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors? This reads like someone thinking out loud. I'd be very surprised if this guy had that good an inside source that he can accurately predict 2 years into the future. I can make predictions too, but I sure as H ain't no Nostradamus ;-) WRT FF, it'll be interesting to see if the new DA* lenses cover the full 35mm frame. If so, it'll show that Pentax are thinking about it. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Driving to GFM (GPS systems)
graywolf wrote: Well, just outside of town here, my Tom Tom Navigator 5.0 software on the pocket pc tells me to take a sharp right in 80 yards. If I do that I drive into a mountain. The thing is that the road was under construction when the GPS van went through and there was a detour from one side of of the road to the other at that time that is long since gone. The road goes through a cut at that point so the software is asking me to drive through solid rock. I run into that a lot. So you obey the GPS??? hard on the car... ann ducks -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO: Harmony, duck couple
Nice shots! I still love the spider web shot!! Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery Response
Markus Maurer wrote: Hi Ann I sent them an email and got the code one day later. Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens? greetings Markus No - I just don't remember Takumar at all I'm 70, remember :) ann -- I did send it to the contact us thing -- that was all I saw as a way to send something. sigh It has been a couple of days... but I don't have time to do any uploading there right now anyway :) ann Were the takumar's Pentax lenses? what I read was that you had to have shot the photos with pentax body and pentax lens ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PSE 5.0 w/Vista
Usually, laptops have keys to allow you to go hogher/lower brightness. It usually works by typing Fn key and another key at the same time e.g. Fn + F7, Fn + Home key etc. Problem is you can only change brightness but not contrast which is annoying. 2007/3/17, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Now that I have the laptop operational with PSE5 I have been playing around some. I can't seem to find a way to change the screen brightness like I can on my XP desktop machine. Naturally the laptop is one of the new LCD screens, but don't they have controls somewhere?? Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Retoucing Comments
On 3/18/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I bet she likes the second a bit better but the severe crop would be as likely a reason... It does look fake after retouching - it is a bitch to do that stuff... but you also changed her coloration. (noticed the lipstick changed color :) ) Yep, on purpose too:-) I agree with Paul, I dont like the framing either. She is a pretty woman and no amount of gausian blurr with bring back her whole face :) YOu are trying to be too artsy , David I think. I think you're the first person to ever accuse me of trying to be too artsy. Bless you Ann :-) Personally, I don't like this kind of stuff. I prefer portraits with texture, but this kind off PP seems to be the common thing these days so I though I'd have a go. It was a mediocre pic to start with. I was basically an exercise to practice some new PP techniques thought I'd throw it out to get a few critical opinions. Thanks for looking commenting. Cheers, Dave. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery Response
ann sanfedele wrote: Markus Maurer wrote: Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens? No - I just don't remember Takumar at all I'm 70, remember :) Up until 1975 there was no such thing as a Pentax lens: Asahi Optical Co. sold their cameras under the Pentax brand name and their lenses under the Takumar brand name. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Pentax Gallery Improvements
Apparently they're still working it and making improvements: I uploaded one photo 15 minutes ago and when I uploaded a second one just a moment ago I got a completely different interface when prompted to add data about the image. Looks nicer but, more importantly, works much better :) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
Amateur here - which lens do you think preferable? I understand that a fixed lens is generally sharper, but 12-24mm is tempting. Maris Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
On 3/17/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1 The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors? This reads like someone thinking out loud. I'd be very surprised if this guy had that good an inside source that he can accurately predict 2 years into the future. I can make predictions too, but I sure as H ain't no Nostradamus ;-) WRT FF, it'll be interesting to see if the new DA* lenses cover the full 35mm frame. If so, it'll show that Pentax are thinking about it. This guy likes to hijack Pentax threads bleating about how he was banned from DPReview simply because he switched from Canon to Pentax. He tends to go on and on and on about having lunch with Pentax reps and his Pentax endorsement, etc. Who knows? Maybe he's not talking out of his ass, but I'd treat anything he says with at least a little suspicion. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
Isn't a link missing ? 2007/3/17, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: His opinion is as valid as my opinion, or yours. Just like his bellybutton is as valid as mine or yours! :-) Me thinks that all he has done is regurgitate what the industry visionaries out there are already spouting about the future of dslr cameras, and basically where the industry goes so goes P,N,C, et al. Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
- Original Message - From: Maris V. Lidaka Sr. Subject: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0? Amateur here - which lens do you think preferable? I understand that a fixed lens is generally sharper, but 12-24mm is tempting. The 14 is faster, which is nice, and also smaller/lighter. Both are horses though. I haven't used either enough yet to be able to say for sure which is the sharper lens, or which is more flare prone. The 12-24 is a very good lens. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Macro Lenses
From: Walter Hamler I need a macro lens. Don't want to spend the bucks for the latest Pentax AF, for that matter I think I would prefer a MF version. KEH has some 100mm f/4 in different versions, one being an A model. They also have a Sigma 90mm f/2.8 A . Anyone know anything about these or others that I need to consider? Walt I lucked into a Pentax-A 100 f/2.8 macro a year or so back, and it's a fine lens. The f/4 lens only goes to .5x, while the f/2.8 goes to 1x. And according to Dimitrov's Pentax K-Mount Equipment Page, the f/2.8A is somewhat more frequently available, even if KEH doesn't actually have one on-hand right now. BH has an Auto Bellows Set A in their used inventory, BTW. Or, I should say, will have had, since I think I'll order it for myself as soon as they re-open this evening. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
There's also this: http://forums.clubsnap.com/showpost.php?p=2912785postcount=11 Apparently fans of Sony rumors have been hearing things. The rumor didn't entirely originate with Benjikan. A discussion has started at dpreview about it: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=22488692 I don't know whether to believe any of this. It does makes some sense as a likely direction given the logic of the market. Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Peso:White dog second bw version
From: Markus Maurer A second and hopefully better version of the polar bear white dog in toned bw can be seen at: http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/whitedog_bw.jpg I like this one more than the color version...despite one of the legs being to hot. greetings Markus Background seems a little busy. What'd he do to his foot? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
I guess it depends on your use of wide angle. What * I * would do if I had the choice now would probably to buy the 12-24 for two reason: * it goes wider but also allows to go up to 24mm (which is not really a wide lens anymore) * I dot not (till now) use wide a lot. Using a 12-24 is flexible. If I use the lens a lot I could enable myself later with a better optical and faster lens which would be the DA14/2.8. Reading the comments of those who own it, it seems the 12-24 is really a very fine lens so I'd buy this one. But this reasoning is only valid (for me) because I do not use wide a lot. 2007/3/17, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Amateur here - which lens do you think preferable? I understand that a fixed lens is generally sharper, but 12-24mm is tempting. Maris Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille -- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Macro Lenses
- Original Message - From: John Sessoms Subject: RE: Macro Lenses I lucked into a Pentax-A 100 f/2.8 macro a year or so back, and it's a fine lens. The f/4 lens only goes to .5x, while the f/2.8 goes to 1x. And according to Dimitrov's Pentax K-Mount Equipment Page, the f/2.8A is somewhat more frequently available, even if KEH doesn't actually have one on-hand right now. BH has an Auto Bellows Set A in their used inventory, BTW. Or, I should say, will have had, since I think I'll order it for myself as soon as they re-open this evening. The A100/2.8 macro is one of the better ones I have used. If you get the auto bellows and want to mount it to a DSLR, make sure you also get a short extension tube as well. The short tube out of the auto extension tube set will do the trick. And, have a look for the 100mm bellows lens. I have the bellows Tak and it is very good, I'd like to get the bayonet one, but not at the prices that sellers seem to think they are worth at the moment. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Peso:White dog second bw version
From: Markus Maurer A second and hopefully better version of the polar bear white dog in toned bw can be seen at: http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/whitedog_bw.jpg I meant to reply earlier. Is she a good example of a Pyrenees by European standard? She looks quite a bit different from what we see here. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Auto-110 SLR
Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110 (actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it. I had not used it in a while, six months or more, and decided to play with it. I put fresh batteries in and a new film cartridge. The first time I tripped the shutter it froze with the shutter closed and the mirror up. The only thing I have done to it since is to try another fresh set of batteries in hope that was what caused the problem. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO: Harmony, duck couple
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:50:28 -0400, Walter Hamler wrote: Nice shots! I still love the spider web shot!! Thanks Walt! Yes, the spider web is hanging on my wall :-) http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=8page=1 Regards, JvW -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Bags Again
I like khaki grin, however that is strictly a personal choice. It would match your vest though GRIN. Cotty wrote: On 17/3/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed: I happen to like the canvas. It has enough heft to provide a bit of protection, but is not bulky like padded cases. Interesting - and which is better - black or sand? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: PESO:K10D Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 test photos
Hi Walt I could provide you with a link to the PEF's if you are interested. I don't compare them to modern lenses, I'm just glad that I can use what I already have so cost wise there is nothing better for me. The backward compatibility is a really strong point of the Pentax brand IMHO and SR for example gives me a lot more photographic possibilities. I will use my M42 SMC Takumar 35, 50 and 85mm next week and if the results are what I expect now the DA kit lens will only be used if I need the 28mm wide end if ever. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Walter Hamler Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:16 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO:K10D Takumar-A 28mm 2.8 test photos I find it difficult to really determine how sharp the resolution/contrast is on web images, especially at only 700 or 800 pixels. They all looked good to me, but that doesn't necessarily put them in the same league as modern DA* lenses. :-) Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Driving to GFM (GPS systems)
LOL! ann sanfedele wrote: graywolf wrote: Well, just outside of town here, my Tom Tom Navigator 5.0 software on the pocket pc tells me to take a sharp right in 80 yards. If I do that I drive into a mountain. The thing is that the road was under construction when the GPS van went through and there was a detour from one side of of the road to the other at that time that is long since gone. The road goes through a cut at that point so the software is asking me to drive through solid rock. I run into that a lot. So you obey the GPS??? hard on the car... ann ducks -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
Both these lenses are very good quality. I have owned and used the DA14 since I bought my *ist DS in January 2005. I recently had a look at a batch of test shots taken with the DA12-24. It confirmed my prior notions based on people's testimonial: - Both are very sharp. - At 14mm focal length, the DA14 outperforms the DA12-24 with respect to rectilinear correction and chromatic aberration. The difference is not enormous, nor does it make the DA12-24 unusable in any way. - Both seem to reach their best performance about 2 stops down from wide open, which mean around f/4.5-5.6 for the DA14 and around f/5.6- f/8 for the DA12-24. So ... if the focal length flexibility is a plus and the additional weight/size is not an issue, the DA12-24 is a great choice. If you prefer smaller size/lighter weight and additional speed, the DA14 is the right choice. The DA14 is also a bit less expensive. Isn't it great when all choices are good? I'm very happy with the DA14, it fits my style of shooting very well. Godfrey On Mar 17, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote: Amateur here - which lens do you think preferable? I understand that a fixed lens is generally sharper, but 12-24mm is tempting. Maris Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Auto-110 SLR
There's a place in, I think, New Jersey, called Essex Camera Repair. They claim that they can repair anything from the classic cameras to the modern digitals. Jim A. Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110 (actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it. I had not used it in a while, six months or more, and decided to play with it. I put fresh batteries in and a new film cartridge. The first time I tripped the shutter it froze with the shutter closed and the mirror up. The only thing I have done to it since is to try another fresh set of batteries in hope that was what caused the problem. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Auto-110 SLR
You might try calling Essex Camera Service: http://www.essexcamera.com/ Godfrey On Mar 17, 2007, at 11:55 AM, John Sessoms wrote: Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110 (actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Bags Again
On Mar 17, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Cotty wrote: Interesting - and which is better - black or sand? I tend to prefer Domke bags in black, but I'm not sure whether they look tatty faster than the sand/khaki. I know the blue and green canvas versions look 'used' very quickly compared to the black. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
If the new lenses cover FF, I don't think they'll be optimized for APS-C. I'm no expert, but I think that in lens design, you have to choose or lose. Paul On Mar 17, 2007, at 1:44 PM, David Savage wrote: On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1 The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors? This reads like someone thinking out loud. I'd be very surprised if this guy had that good an inside source that he can accurately predict 2 years into the future. I can make predictions too, but I sure as H ain't no Nostradamus ;-) WRT FF, it'll be interesting to see if the new DA* lenses cover the full 35mm frame. If so, it'll show that Pentax are thinking about it. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery Improvements
I wish they would fix my page. I have 24 pics in the gallery, but if you go to my page, you will see anywhere from one to 24, depending, I guess, on how the software feels. I e-mailed the mysterious people behind the curtain but received no response. They probably have bigger fish to fry. Excuse the mixed metaphors:-). Paul On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Apparently they're still working it and making improvements: I uploaded one photo 15 minutes ago and when I uploaded a second one just a moment ago I got a completely different interface when prompted to add data about the image. Looks nicer but, more importantly, works much better :) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
I haven't used the 14/2.8, but the DA 12-24 is quite good and substantially wider. It's the difference between 18 and 21mm fov in 35mm parlance. If you need the speed, the 14/2.8 is probably the way to go. If not, the 12-24 performs very well, particularly at f5.6 on up, and it's decent at f4. I generally use it at f8 or f11, and it's excellent at those aps. On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote: Amateur here - which lens do you think preferable? I understand that a fixed lens is generally sharper, but 12-24mm is tempting. Maris Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Auto-110 SLR
You can probably buy another one for less than it would cost to repair it. Even the super usually goes for quite a bit less than $100 US. Paul On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:55 PM, John Sessoms wrote: Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110 (actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it. I had not used it in a while, six months or more, and decided to play with it. I put fresh batteries in and a new film cartridge. The first time I tripped the shutter it froze with the shutter closed and the mirror up. The only thing I have done to it since is to try another fresh set of batteries in hope that was what caused the problem. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Gallery Response
Hi Mark Kepler lists the 1957 Ashai Pentax as the first body with the name Pentax. Pentax Europe was founded 1962 http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/company/company/history.html 2002 Corporate name changed from Asahi Optical Co., Ltd. to PENTAX Corporation You are right that the first lenses with the name Pentax appeared in1975. But, regarding the lens naming would you say that only a lens with the name Pentax on it is a Pentax lens or does it qualify if it is built by Asahi (Pentax)? And, should M42 Takumar lenses be allowed in the Pentax Gallery then or not? I don't want to split hairs here and my excuse to Ann in advance if I'm in error. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Roberts Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 7:05 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Response ann sanfedele wrote: Markus Maurer wrote: Are you pulling my leg asking if a Takumar lens is a Pentax lens? No - I just don't remember Takumar at all I'm 70, remember :) Up until 1975 there was no such thing as a Pentax lens: Asahi Optical Co. sold their cameras under the Pentax brand name and their lenses under the Takumar brand name. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
David Savage wrote: On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1 The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors? This reads like someone thinking out loud. He pretty much admits as much in the referenced post. I'd be very surprised if this guy had that good an inside source that he can accurately predict 2 years into the future. I have good reason to believe that he has no inside connection at all. :) I can make predictions too, but I sure as H ain't no Nostradamus Oh come on. You can make predictions as accurately as Nostradamus! (That's just not a very high standard!) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
If the new lenses cover FF, I don't think they'll be optimized for APS-C. I'm no expert, but I think that in lens design, you have to choose or lose. Paul - The Tokina version of the 50-135 F2.8 is available. So it should be possible to find out if it covers FF. Anyone know a Nikon or Canon shooter with one? Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Peso:White dog second bw version
Hi William and John I have no idea about the pedigree William, in fact it was PDML member Carlos who told me about it. That's why I called him polar bear ;-) I met the owner of the dog Duna Monday for a first five minutes talk. John, the dog had some kind of small medical treatment in the morning but nothing serious as I was told. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 7:50 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Peso:White dog second bw version From: Markus Maurer A second and hopefully better version of the polar bear white dog in toned bw can be seen at: http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/whitedog_bw.jpg I meant to reply earlier. Is she a good example of a Pyrenees by European standard? She looks quite a bit different from what we see here. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery
Dario Bonazza wrote: I've tried an experiment. I've edited the title (only the title, nothing else) of a picture of mine which was already Approved in gallery. By doing that, the picture turns back into Ready for review (or whatever they call it) status. Then, that same picture was Declined. Is the title the main reason for having a picture approved or declined? LOL Has anyone had the opposite happen? That is, re-submitting a previously declined photo and having it accepted? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Dario Bonazza wrote: I've tried an experiment. I've edited the title (only the title, nothing else) of a picture of mine which was already Approved in gallery. By doing that, the picture turns back into Ready for review (or whatever they call it) status. Then, that same picture was Declined. Is the title the main reason for having a picture approved or declined? LOL Has anyone had the opposite happen? That is, re-submitting a previously declined photo and having it accepted? Yep. but I still can't get the Leadville photo through. It's got me boggled. Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote: Amateur here - which lens do you think preferable? I understand that a fixed lens is generally sharper, but 12-24mm is tempting. Maris Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0? Hey Maris, if you go here: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/index- flash.jsp#section=DRILLsubSection=exifLenssubSubSection=70 You can see a couple dozen examples of shots with the 12-24. Examples of those taken with the 14 are here: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/index- flash.jsp#section=DRILLsubSection=exifLenssubSubSection=20 Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Wedding shoot...deposit?
From: Bong Manayon That seems to be standard. Google wedding contracts and a lot of them starts off with 50%. The other issue is when you collect the other half; but I guess that depends on where you come from. Bong The deposit should be enough to compensate you for not being able to schedule another wedding if they cancel. In that case you probably should consider a difference between early and late cancellations. It's one thing if they cancel a week to a month before the wedding leaving you without gainful employment for the date in question and if they change their minds six months or more before the scheduled date leaving time for another client to book you. AND the contract should spell out not just the deposit, but exactly when the balance is due. If you don't get paid in full before shooting the wedding, you probably won't get paid. One way I've seen it done is breaking the payments down ... deposit due at signing, professional fees due before the wedding, print production fees due upon delivery of finished photos albums. On 3/14/07, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to be shooting a wedding in October. We've agreed on a price, but how much should I charge for a deposit? I'm thinking 50% but is that too high? Thanks James M -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: PESO: Harmony, duck couple
Hi Jan I like the spider web and the caterpillar and the term Scheepsjongens :-), that sounds much more funny than the german word Schiffsjunge. Scheps meens leaning in Swiss german dialect. Swiss Outremer and Swiss Atlanique called that Deckhand = first rank of a seaman or Messboy = first rank of a (chief)steward. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jan van Wijk Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 8:13 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO: Harmony, duck couple On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:50:28 -0400, Walter Hamler wrote: Nice shots! I still love the spider web shot!! Thanks Walt! Yes, the spider web is hanging on my wall :-) http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=8page=1 Regards, JvW -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Auto-110 SLR
Hi John I had that twice with the Ricoh KRx-10 and when I removed the lens the shutter released. I have no clue why. greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Sessoms Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 7:55 PM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Auto-110 SLR Does anyone know somewhere that will attempt to repair a Pentax Auto-110 (actually Auto-110 Super)? I have one that froze up last year and I have not been able to find anyone who will undertake to repair it. I had not used it in a while, six months or more, and decided to play with it. I put fresh batteries in and a new film cartridge. The first time I tripped the shutter it froze with the shutter closed and the mirror up. The only thing I have done to it since is to try another fresh set of batteries in hope that was what caused the problem. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Digital 14mm F2.8 or 12-24mm F4.0?
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: Hey Maris, if you go here: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/index- flash.jsp#section=DRILLsubSection=exifLenssubSubSection=70 You can see a couple dozen examples of shots with the 12-24. Examples of those taken with the 14 are here: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/index- flash.jsp#section=DRILLsubSection=exifLenssubSubSection=20 huh. Might have to copy and paste into your browser... Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RE: Pentax Gallery
Hi Doug would you show the Leadville photo here? greetings Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug Brewer Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 9:55 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Dario Bonazza wrote: I've tried an experiment. I've edited the title (only the title, nothing else) of a picture of mine which was already Approved in gallery. By doing that, the picture turns back into Ready for review (or whatever they call it) status. Then, that same picture was Declined. Is the title the main reason for having a picture approved or declined? LOL Has anyone had the opposite happen? That is, re-submitting a previously declined photo and having it accepted? Yep. but I still can't get the Leadville photo through. It's got me boggled. Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
PESO: Three of Four
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5736480size=lg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Pentax Gallery
One of my images has been in on hold status for about three days. Anyone else had this happen? What dilemma could possibly be causing such an extended period of indecision? Guess I could check with Carolyn. ;) As I would expect, the Premier Collection is increasing very slowly. Glad to see it. Jack Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
Well, we have just read the PMA interview with two Pentax managers and they say a few things such as Easy model changes should not be done or We no longer make cheap revisions and Actually, the next product already exists. Does this not mean that the K10D replacement that should be available this autumn will be a substantial upgrade, along the lines suggested by the rumor(s)? Bertil -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: RE: Pentax Gallery Response
Markus Maurer wrote: would you say that only a lens with the name Pentax on it is a Pentax lens or does it qualify if it is built by Asahi (Pentax)? Well, if it's sold as a Pentax lens it's a Pentax lens :) If it was made after Asahi changed its corporate name to Pentax (2-3 years ago) it's a Pentax lens no matter what's written on it. Before that I suppose it could accurately be called either a Takumar or an Asahi lens. And, should M42 Takumar lenses be allowed in the Pentax Gallery then or not? I expect they would allow it since they were made by Asahi and there were no lenses sold under the name Pentax back then. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
takumar_test
Hello Walt, I find it difficult to really determine how sharp the resolution/contrast is on web images, especially at only 700 or 800 pixels. They all looked good to me, but that doesn't necessarily put them in the same league as modern DA* lenses. :-) Walt I only have the 'modern' kit-zoom DA 18-55AL to compare, but the SuperTak 55/1.8 wins at 1.8 against the DA at 5.6 on 55 mm www.skiboy.com/fiso/supertak55_1.8maxap.jpg (950k) www.skiboy.com/fiso/smc18_55at55maxap.jpg (1030k) 100% crops, CAUTION big files! -- Best regards, Fiso mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: Pentax Gallery
Not sure. I did try and upload an IR shot from 2006, the sepia one i could not reproduce fopr a big print, and it was rejected due to no Exif info. I saved as a jpg and SFW, so i thing maybe sfw might have done something. Dave On 3/17/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of my images has been in on hold status for about three days. Anyone else had this happen? What dilemma could possibly be causing such an extended period of indecision? Guess I could check with Carolyn. ;) As I would expect, the Premier Collection is increasing very slowly. Glad to see it. Jack Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: For Those Who Enjoy Rumors
Well, yes. Uh, no. Maybe. Paul On Mar 17, 2007, at 5:18 PM, Bertil Holmberg wrote: Well, we have just read the PMA interview with two Pentax managers and they say a few things such as Easy model changes should not be done or We no longer make cheap revisions and Actually, the next product already exists. Does this not mean that the K10D replacement that should be available this autumn will be a substantial upgrade, along the lines suggested by the rumor(s)? Bertil -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
