Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users I would also like to see single sign on capabilities (Kerberos) on the WebAdmin and UserPortal when using IPA as authentication source. Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 11:26 PM, Alexandru Vladulescu wrote: I would like to add a request for the new upper coming version 3.2 if possible: Hi Alexandru, just to note my question was for the post 3.2 version, as 3.2 is basically done. Although some of you use spice instead of VNC, as I am an Ubuntu user on my desktop and laptop, spice protocol is not working withing my OS; even if I tried to build it from source, search unofficial deb packs or convert if from rpm packages. I know spice is strongly supported on the Fedora community, but I, myself on the server side work on RH Enterprise and Centos, but as for desktop use, I have a very hard time make the spice plugin for firefox to work. Therefore for my solution I had setup a VNC reflector + some shell automation to make it work between 2 different subnets (one inside and one outside) -- this, somehow, adding to the initial scope. This would have been much more easier to have a VNC proxy inside the ovirt engine function, from where to make the necessary setups and assignments of the console to each VM, or even though I might sound funny to make a solution as vrde on Vbox, because works damn great and it's easy to setup or change. Last question, If I might ask, when is the 3.2 planned to be released (aprox) last update was here: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-January/011454.html Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Maybe in order to get all those suggestions well managed and voted by the community, we shell integrate in the oVirt web site something like http://demo.ideatorrent.org/ - Original Message - From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com To: Alex Leonhardt alex.t...@gmail.com Cc: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 4:59:41 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? On 01/08/2013 04:42 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote: Thats true, so nvm - forget my request :) ... In general, how about a poll form that could be sent to the list ? it'll make it very easy to spot what is most important for us users :) ? e.g. use http://www.easypolls.net/ ? that's the plan ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Hi, +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability. I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and GFS with RHEV-M, but I feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what is required for ovirt manager. Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/) would be sufficient to create an easy to configure ovirt manager failover cluster? Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Siggi, Great idea is running this oVIrt-engine to two or more vm's in to oVirt, example: * Install 2 nodes or more and running oVirt-engine provisory in laptop, for example, after create 2 vm's HA for permanent engine virtualized and HA. Only suggestion. Marcelo Barbosa *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com* On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Hi, +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability. I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and GFS with RHEV-M, but I feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what is required for ovirt manager. Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/) would be sufficient to create an easy to configure ovirt manager failover cluster? Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi, What will happen in case of a shutdown of all nodes and both ovirt-engine vm's? Will the nodes be able to start it's virtual machines without a connection to the ovirt-engine? Rgds, Siggi On Wed, January 9, 2013 13:27, Marcelo Barbosa wrote: Siggi, Great idea is running this oVIrt-engine to two or more vm's in to oVirt, example: * Install 2 nodes or more and running oVirt-engine provisory in laptop, for example, after create 2 vm's HA for permanent engine virtualized and HA. Only suggestion. Marcelo Barbosa *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com* On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Hi, +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability. I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and GFS with RHEV-M, but I feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what is required for ovirt manager. Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/) would be sufficient to create an easy to configure ovirt manager failover cluster? Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Siggi, As far as my knowledge reaches, I believe the engine off does not interfere with us, or you will lose HA and other resources, and if we all just outside the world: D so the engine will not help much, I think, good test for all. Rgds. Marcelo Barbosa *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com* On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: Hi, What will happen in case of a shutdown of all nodes and both ovirt-engine vm's? Will the nodes be able to start it's virtual machines without a connection to the ovirt-engine? Rgds, Siggi On Wed, January 9, 2013 13:27, Marcelo Barbosa wrote: Siggi, Great idea is running this oVIrt-engine to two or more vm's in to oVirt, example: * Install 2 nodes or more and running oVirt-engine provisory in laptop, for example, after create 2 vm's HA for permanent engine virtualized and HA. Only suggestion. Marcelo Barbosa *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com* On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Hi, +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability. I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and GFS with RHEV-M, but I feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what is required for ovirt manager. Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/ ) would be sufficient to create an easy to configure ovirt manager failover cluster? Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hey Sigbjorn, I currently use a cluster of two management nodes with a classical corosync/pacemaker/drbd setup which also provides DNS, DHCP, TFTP, all repositories we need to install our VMs and the central configuration management. We have a failover IP (and hostname) and our cluster makes sure that all databases/services which need to be kept together are running on one host. However, setting up something like this is a quite complex process, so having a postgresql cluster (at least with postgres 9+) is not too difficult to set up and then having a redundant engine cluster would be a perfect solution. KR Jörn -Original Message- From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Sigbjorn Lie Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013 12:33 To: Itamar Heim Cc: users Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? On Thu, January 3, 2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Hi, +1 for clustered ovirt manager for availability. I've seen a pdf document describing how to configure Red Hat Cluster and GFS with RHEV-M, but I feel Red Hat Cluster and GFS adds too much complexity compared to what is required for ovirt manager. Perhaps the use of glusterfs and keepalived (http://www.keepalived.org/) would be sufficient to create an easy to configure ovirt manager failover cluster? Regards, Siggi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Jan 3, 2013 4:15 PM, Moran Goldboim mgold...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:42 PM, Darrell Budic wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. I'm going to second this strongly! Official support would be very much appreciated. Bonus points for supporting a migration from the dreyou packages. No offense to dreyou, of course, just rather be better supported by the official line on Centos 6.x. EL6 rpms are planned to be delivered with 3.2 GA version, and nightly builds from there on. hopefully we can push it to 3.2 beta. Moran. Better support/integration of windows based SPICE clients would also be much appreciated, I have many end users on Windows, and it's been a chore to keep it working so far. This includes the client drivers for windows VMs to support the SPICE display for multiple displays. More of a client side thing, I know, but a desired feature in my environment. Thanks for the continued progress and support as well! - Darrell Budic Zenfire ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users Will the EL6 releases also include an EL6 version of ovirt-node? If not will the build dependencies for ovirt node be available to allow for custom node iso builds? - Trey ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/07/2013 06:11 PM, Rick Beldin wrote: - cleaner work-flow in creating and associating storage, especially NFS - better error reporting from engine back to admin user during admin operations. Hi Rick, can you please give a few examples/ideas on these two? thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Thats true, so nvm - forget my request :) ... In general, how about a poll form that could be sent to the list ? it'll make it very easy to spot what is most important for us users :) ? e.g. use http://www.easypolls.net/ ? Alex 2013/1/7 René Koch (ovido) r.k...@ovido.at Hi Alex, You can already group VMs using tags or search filters... -- Regards, René On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:16 +, Alex Leonhardt wrote: Also, grouping (folders?) of VMs would be great to get a better overview in the Virtual Machines section. Alex 2013/1/7 Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de On 03.01.2013 17:25, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick And after thinking a bit more about it, this is what I like to see in addition: - clustered engine (eliminate this SPOF) - when FreeIPA is used for authentication, make use of its CA and generate certificates using ipa-getcert Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/08/2013 04:42 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote: Thats true, so nvm - forget my request :) ... In general, how about a poll form that could be sent to the list ? it'll make it very easy to spot what is most important for us users :) ? e.g. use http://www.easypolls.net/ ? that's the plan ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Also, grouping (folders?) of VMs would be great to get a better overview in the Virtual Machines section. Alex 2013/1/7 Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de On 03.01.2013 17:25, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick And after thinking a bit more about it, this is what I like to see in addition: - clustered engine (eliminate this SPOF) - when FreeIPA is used for authentication, make use of its CA and generate certificates using ipa-getcert Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi Alex, You can already group VMs using tags or search filters... -- Regards, René On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:16 +, Alex Leonhardt wrote: Also, grouping (folders?) of VMs would be great to get a better overview in the Virtual Machines section. Alex 2013/1/7 Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de On 03.01.2013 17:25, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick And after thinking a bit more about it, this is what I like to see in addition: - clustered engine (eliminate this SPOF) - when FreeIPA is used for authentication, make use of its CA and generate certificates using ipa-getcert Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi Itamar and list!After reading all the suggestions on this subject, it would be much appreciated if someone(perhaps you, Itamar, since you asked the question) could sum this all up, and get us all on the list a view of all the wishes, and the priority that seems to be among the list people.Then presenting this priority for us, so we can have a discussion about it.Rgrds JohanOn 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/07/2013 12:06 PM, Johan Kragsterman wrote: Hi Itamar and list! After reading all the suggestions on this subject, it would be much appreciated if someone(perhaps you, Itamar, since you asked the question) could sum this all up, and get us all on the list a view of all the wishes, and the priority that seems to be among the list people. Then presenting this priority for us, so we can have a discussion about it. I'm planning to sum this up, probably next week. Rgrds Johan On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
I would like to see export domains deployable to a SAN volume. I had to fiddle with various bits that had nothing to do with the problem for about an hour before I realized the nfs service on the host designated for hosting the exports NFS volume was not enabled. The lesson for the version I'm working with now (3.1) is to disconnect the export domain when it's not in use, but it would be useful if it were mobile (or at least not a deal-breaker for hypervisors that are trying to rejoin the cluster) -S ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
A general +1 for every point basically. Very good and thought through points. The ones I like the most are: * Spice client- and plugin for Firefox on Windows and Ubuntu * Preferrably working through both Admin- and User(customer) portal;) * Guest Agent for Windows. Most of our VMs are Win2008- and R2, 2012's are coming too. * Host Profiles would be a time saver * Resource Pools * Clone VM's * Resizing VM disks from GUI * Upload ISO's from GUI * Integrate virt-v2v into GUI * Edit VM settings before import Also I would like to make a wish of my own: * Time-share scheduling. - The ability to rent out resources available only during N window of time for different groups of users. Our users tend to only need resource capacity in batches, crunching their numbers or whatnot during an intence period of time and can be quiet for a while, then come back for some more. That´s why I would like to see an interface where we as an organization could pool together our metal into oVirt and then together sit down and schedule it so that everyone gets their pice of the cake, so to speak. E.g. Group X rents 64 vCPU's and 4TB RAM from 20130601 to 20130801, during which time they are guaranteed those resources, and then those machines will expire and be automatically deleted, freeing up those resources again. Something like that would make collaboration between our different groups much easier. Best Regards and Happy New Year! /Karli Sjöberg fre 2013-01-04 klockan 12:11 +0100 skrev René Koch (ovido): Hi, First of all thanks for starting this discussion. My feedback is mainly based on RHEV, as I'm using RHEV in our company and on customer side. oVirt is cool as I can see what new features next RHEV version may/will bring and what issues other users have with this technology. What I like: * web based UI * KVM as it brings the highest virtualization performance on the market * RHEL/Fedora as a hypervisor for more flexibility * tags and bookmarks with search filters - great for big installations * server and desktop virtualization can be done with one gui * open source of course ;) * hook scripts - sooo cool! * rest-api * user portal - some of our customers use this as a basic cloud tool for providing vms and self-provisioning features with accounting using postgresql database What I would like to see in future release in oVirt and after testing in RHEV (most of these points are based on customer feedback, too, who bought RHEV or where we had at least a pre-sales appointment): * Spice-XPI for Firefox on Windows (and maybe Ubuntu): I know it's a lot of work to build it for every new firefox version, but providing it for Firefox LTS would be a really good start. At the moment Internet Explorer ist required for full use of admin und user portal (or VNC has to be used). * ovirt-guest-agents for major Linux distributions: - openSUSE - SLES - Ubuntu - Debian * Virtualize ovirt-engine on ovirt hosts I know that this would require major changes due to how oVirt works (libvirt and vdsm), but nearly every customers is asking: why can't I install my hypervisors, create a vm for RHEV manager and configure the environment then (in the same way as it is possible with VMware)? * Make ovirt-engine more Enterprise ready Compared with VMware (sorry for always comparing it with VMware, but it's the market leader and it has many nice features which would be great in oVirt/RHEV, too) oVirt required more tasks done on command line or via API/Shell/GUI as features are missing in the web GUI: - Deploy network configs on all hosts When creating a new logical network in a Cluster it has to be created on all hosts before it can be used. It would be great if this could be done automatically (except for rhevm/spice/storage-networks where an IP address of each host is required). The workflow could be: + create new logical network + click on deploy button + create ifcfg-files on hosts + make ifcfg-files persistent on ovirt Nodes + bring interface up + check if interfaces are up + make logical network Operational if deployment was successful on all hosts - Configure ovirt hosts from GUI It would be really an improvement if all settings of the TUI (like DNS, NTP, syslog, kdump, admin and root passwords, hostname,...) could be configured in ovirt-engine gui, too (in hosts tab). Plus including changing multipath.conf in Web GUI would be very nice. - Create host profiles Storing all configuration settings of the TUI and host tab (without ip addresses for sure) in a profile would make changes easier and speed up deployment of new hypervisors. I'm thinking of: + create a profile which contains e.g. DNS, NTP and admin passwords + link profile to hosts + change DNS in profile + in hosts tab you can see that there are changes between the profile and the hosts + bring host in maintenance mode + sync profile (and maybe reboot host) When installing new hosts (via CD or PXE) the profile can be used to automatically configure the host without
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Several topics come to mind: - cleaner work-flow in creating and associating storage, especially NFS - better error reporting from engine back to admin user during admin operations. - the ability to have users access consoles of virtual machines whereever they may be. I think it should be expected that limited access data centers will be everywhere, from complete NAT'd environments to some with external firewalls that limit some ports. This should be part of engine and hypervisor installation, and transparent to the end user. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi, Firstly, thanks for all the great work on oVirt in 2012. What I haven't seen mentioned yet is any Open vSwitch or Openstack Quantum integration. This would help scale oVirt even further. I've seen a POC already out there http://www.siliconloons.com/?p=179 Regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae B.V. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
+1 :) Le 6 janv. 2013 17:41, Jorick Astrego jor...@netbulae.eu a écrit : Hi, Firstly, thanks for all the great work on oVirt in 2012. What I haven't seen mentioned yet is any Open vSwitch or Openstack Quantum integration. This would help scale oVirt even further. I've seen a POC already out there http://www.siliconloons.com/?**p=179http://www.siliconloons.com/?p=179 Regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae B.V. __**_ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/usershttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 03.01.2013 17:25, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick And after thinking a bit more about it, this is what I like to see in addition: - clustered engine (eliminate this SPOF) - when FreeIPA is used for authentication, make use of its CA and generate certificates using ipa-getcert Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi all, What I like: Its open! both "thin" oVirt node and "fat" Linux+VDSM. Browser based GUI, Firefox supported. Spice console works just fine! What I really would like to include in the coming releases: Option to resize disk in user interface and CLI. Import, upload, raw and qcow2 images from the web gui and CLI. Importing VMDK (vmWare) would be nice as well. Upload ISO from the web gui. What about exporting raw and qcow2 images (and convert to vmdk)... Option to disable "This Browser version isn't optimal for displaying the application". Ater 10 times it gets anoying. Better recovery for the ISO and export domains. Currently, if I keep my export domain connected a crashing server might cause problems. After creating a new server en reconnecting the old export or iso domain, it will say "it is allready connected to another domain". The export domain is such a nice way to backup important templates and virtual machines :) Multiple ISO domains. Both export and ISO domains on local storage, iSCSI, CIFS etc. Looking forward to the new release! Winfried Op 03-01-13 17:08, Itamar Heim schreef: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi!There are many promising features in oVirt, but still I feel it is just "promising", not for production.The most critical issue for me, that is preventing me from using oVirt in production, is the "single point of failure" of the engine. I wouldn't want the struggle of setting up a new engine, and all the hazards that brings, in a production environment, in the case of an engine failureSo, some sort of clustered engine, or master/slave, or whatever can solve this situation.Perhaps one of the reasons this is difficult is because of the integration of both admin portal and user portal? Then I believe it was a mistake to combine them, and that it would be better to split them.Rgrds JohanOp 03-01-13 17:08, Itamar Heim schreef: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___Users mailing listUsers@ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
+1 this :) ... I use dreyou's packages too ... also - ovirt/rhev agent for centos 5.8 would be a nice to have :) 2013/1/3 Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Easier import of existing Nodes back into a new oVirt Engine would be great - it's a complete mess at the moment (if one doesnt have a backup) - I'm looking at this from VMware users point of view, with them, all you need to do is point it at a server and it'll import everything that's already there - oVirt should have the same capabilities / with some confirmation screens that it belongs to another storage domain, etc. etc. and if one wants to force it, but it should still be possible ... Alex 2013/1/4 Alex Leonhardt alex.t...@gmail.com +1 this :) ... I use dreyou's packages too ... also - ovirt/rhev agent for centos 5.8 would be a nice to have :) 2013/1/3 Patrick Hurrelmann patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Original Message - From: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net To: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:47:00 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? I'd like to see a spice client for Mac - i know of various ports but as of now on 10.8 i have to use VNC which is not ideal. I now spice != ovirt however they are very linked at this time. What do you mean? a client or a browser plugin? i suppose ideally both - a browser plugin would be great as then interaction between the GUI and the console would be seamless with the ability to use a standalone client if it were required. thanks ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi, First of all thanks for starting this discussion. My feedback is mainly based on RHEV, as I'm using RHEV in our company and on customer side. oVirt is cool as I can see what new features next RHEV version may/will bring and what issues other users have with this technology. What I like: * web based UI * KVM as it brings the highest virtualization performance on the market * RHEL/Fedora as a hypervisor for more flexibility * tags and bookmarks with search filters - great for big installations * server and desktop virtualization can be done with one gui * open source of course ;) * hook scripts - sooo cool! * rest-api * user portal - some of our customers use this as a basic cloud tool for providing vms and self-provisioning features with accounting using postgresql database What I would like to see in future release in oVirt and after testing in RHEV (most of these points are based on customer feedback, too, who bought RHEV or where we had at least a pre-sales appointment): * Spice-XPI for Firefox on Windows (and maybe Ubuntu): I know it's a lot of work to build it for every new firefox version, but providing it for Firefox LTS would be a really good start. At the moment Internet Explorer ist required for full use of admin und user portal (or VNC has to be used). * ovirt-guest-agents for major Linux distributions: - openSUSE - SLES - Ubuntu - Debian * Virtualize ovirt-engine on ovirt hosts I know that this would require major changes due to how oVirt works (libvirt and vdsm), but nearly every customers is asking: why can't I install my hypervisors, create a vm for RHEV manager and configure the environment then (in the same way as it is possible with VMware)? * Make ovirt-engine more Enterprise ready Compared with VMware (sorry for always comparing it with VMware, but it's the market leader and it has many nice features which would be great in oVirt/RHEV, too) oVirt required more tasks done on command line or via API/Shell/GUI as features are missing in the web GUI: - Deploy network configs on all hosts When creating a new logical network in a Cluster it has to be created on all hosts before it can be used. It would be great if this could be done automatically (except for rhevm/spice/storage-networks where an IP address of each host is required). The workflow could be: + create new logical network + click on deploy button + create ifcfg-files on hosts + make ifcfg-files persistent on ovirt Nodes + bring interface up + check if interfaces are up + make logical network Operational if deployment was successful on all hosts - Configure ovirt hosts from GUI It would be really an improvement if all settings of the TUI (like DNS, NTP, syslog, kdump, admin and root passwords, hostname,...) could be configured in ovirt-engine gui, too (in hosts tab). Plus including changing multipath.conf in Web GUI would be very nice. - Create host profiles Storing all configuration settings of the TUI and host tab (without ip addresses for sure) in a profile would make changes easier and speed up deployment of new hypervisors. I'm thinking of: + create a profile which contains e.g. DNS, NTP and admin passwords + link profile to hosts + change DNS in profile + in hosts tab you can see that there are changes between the profile and the hosts + bring host in maintenance mode + sync profile (and maybe reboot host) When installing new hosts (via CD or PXE) the profile can be used to automatically configure the host without providing all settings via boot options + configure all networks, custom multipath.conf,... Host profile should be used for full RHEL/Fedora hosts as well. - Update RHEL/Fedora Hypervisors from GUI It would be nice if Fedora hosts could be updated from the ovirt-engine GUI like the ovirt Node. Running yum check-update on host and displaying notice if there are updates available. - Implement resource pools At the moment only Quotas are available (which is great, btw), but in some cases it's necessary to implement resource pools. E.g. Limit CPU, Memory and Network for group of test vms, but give full resources to production vms. This could be done with cgroups. - Clone vms I'm missing the possibility of cloning vms without creating a template. - Resize disk in GUI Increasing the size of a disk would help a lot. At the moment I create new disks and put it into volume group on vm, but resizing would be nicer in some cases and will reduce the number of disks. - Upload ISOs within the GUI to ISO domain - Integrate virt-v2v into oVirt GUI It would be cool if VMs could be Migrated from other systems within the GUI using virt-v2v as a backend. - Edit settings of vms before importing them Most the of the settings like disk type (IDE/VirtIO), nic but also vm type (server/desktop) and access protocol (Spice/VNC) can't be edited withing oVirt/RHEVM GUI before importing them. These settings can only be changed by editing the xml directly. Disk type and nic is risky of course, but working for most Linux
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? With offline migration, I means the guest is not running while moving it from one host to another. I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and another called Intel (for the xeon). Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't. I'm not aware that you can't. Ok, now is see my problem. you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other. yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue? To move the guest I need to edit the guest and than I can change the cluster. Thanks, Soeren I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition. Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu configuration -cpu qemu32 or -cpu qemu64. Regards, Soeren [...] ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Dear Itamar, My dreams for oVirt 3.2: 1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent); 2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine; 3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and largest world use; 4) Show in Virtual Machines General ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual Machines Network Interfaces show ip; 5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option; 6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem clusters, and more...) example: https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ... Thanks. Marcelo Barbosa *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com* On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? With offline migration, I means the guest is not running while moving it from one host to another. I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and another called Intel (for the xeon). Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't. I'm not aware that you can't. Ok, now is see my problem. you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other. yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue? To move the guest I need to edit the guest and than I can change the cluster. Thanks, Soeren I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition. Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu configuration -cpu qemu32 or -cpu qemu64. Regards, Soeren [...] __**_ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/usershttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
1) I would like to have the ability to import an existing VM image from outside as a template into oVirt, then new VMs can be cloned from this template. 2) I would like to have an oVirt trial package based on nested-kvm. This package will contain several vdsm node images, one engine image and one storage several image. After the package is installed into a physical server, the images can be started as VMs including the engine, the VDSM nodes, the storage server. The VDSM nodes must support nested-kvm to have nested VM on them. It is very quick and simple for a new-comer to try the oVirt envionment. Itamar Heim: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- --- 舒明 Shu Ming Open Virtualization Engineerning; CSTL, IBM Corp. Tel: 86-10-82451626 Tieline: 9051626 E-mail: shum...@cn.ibm.com or shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, PRC ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200: Dear Itamar, My dreams for oVirt 3.2: 1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent); 2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine; 3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and largest world use; spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will still be linux-only. David 4) Show in Virtual Machines General ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual Machines Network Interfaces show ip; 5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option; 6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem clusters, and more...) example: https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ... Thanks. Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? With offline migration, I means the guest is not running while moving it from one host to another. I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and another called Intel (for the xeon). Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't. I'm not aware that you can't. Ok, now is see my problem. you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other. yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue? To move the guest I need to edit the guest and than I can change the cluster. Thanks, Soeren I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition. Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu configuration -cpu qemu32 or -cpu qemu64. Regards, Soeren [...] ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- David Jaša, RHCE SPICE QE based in Brno GPG Key: 22C33E24 Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24 ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
I'd like to see a built in VNC console that is java or a Spice java console, something that runs cross platform, OS X, Windows, Linux etc... On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:04 AM, David Jaša dj...@redhat.com wrote: Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200: Dear Itamar, My dreams for oVirt 3.2: 1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent); 2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine; 3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and largest world use; spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will still be linux-only. David 4) Show in Virtual Machines General ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual Machines Network Interfaces show ip; 5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option; 6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem clusters, and more...) example: https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ... Thanks. Marcelo Barbosa mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? With offline migration, I means the guest is not running while moving it from one host to another. I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and another called Intel (for the xeon). Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't. I'm not aware that you can't. Ok, now is see my problem. you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other. yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue? To move the guest I need to edit the guest and than I can change the cluster. Thanks, Soeren I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition. Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu configuration -cpu qemu32 or -cpu qemu64. Regards, Soeren [...] ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- David Jaša, RHCE SPICE QE based in Brno GPG Key: 22C33E24 Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24 ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar Good/useful: Open Source virtualization with a strong web management interface. Rapidly improving, too. wish improved: SPICE connection reliability and LDAPS support. wish added: native ATA-over-Ethernet SAN support. wish removed: Kerberos dependencies. Let people who want Kerb have it, but don't force it where it's not needed. LDAP over SSL is secure. Many thanks to all the oVirt team for all their hard work! --Charlie ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit whets my appetite) :) Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. Regards, Soeren Thanks, Itamar [...] [1] http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Migration ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? Thanks, Itamar Regards, Soeren Thanks, Itamar [...] [1] http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Migration ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
This is what I'm missing right now in oVirt 3.1: Better GlusterFS support. === 1. Add a checkbox when creating a volume: Set oVirt permissions so that the vdsm : kvm permissions are set. I don't want it to be per-default because I'd like to use Volumes tabs as a Volumes manager for Glusterfs volumes and not only Glusterfs volumes aimed at virtual machines. From: http://blog.jebpages.com/archives/ovirt-3-1-glusterized/ : ( For now, the Gluster volume manager neglects to set brick directory permissions correctly, so after adding bricks on a machine, you have to return to the terminal and run chown -R 36.36 /data (assuming /data is where you are storing your volume bricks) to enable oVirt to write to the volumes. ) 2. Add a quota tab in Volumes. So that you can enable/disable/edit its quota: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Enabling_Quota http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Managing_Directory_Quota All In One (AIO) bigger timeout === From: http://blog.jebpages.com/archives/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-1-edition/ ( I’ve found that the all-in-one installer sometimes times out during the install process. If the script times out during the final “AIO: Adding Local host (This may take several minutes)” step, you can proceed to the web admin console to complete the process. If it times out at an earlier point, like waiting for the jboss-as server to start, you should run “engine-cleanup” and then re-run “engine-setup”) and my quote: (Before running engine-setup you have to edit: /usr/share/ovirt-engine/scripts/plugins/ all_in_one_100.py file and edit the waitForHostUp function so that the timeout is smaller. Like this: def waitForHostUp(): utils.retry(isHostUp, tries=40, timeout=300, sleep=5)) Installation on disable SElinux == If SElinux is disabled then oVirt installation does not work. So I think that either is advised to use it or... it's fixed so that it works even without SElinux. All-in-one script should take care of last steps == Not sure about this last point but I think that AIO should be able to perform the iso domain attachment to the datacenter in itself. Check 5th step on: http://blog.jebpages.com/archives/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-1-edition/ There might be more glitches but these are the most important ones for me that I remember of. Guide me help texts == One more. The Guide me dialogs are very handy. But I think they miss a little help on them to explain such stupid things as what's the purpose of adding an storage domain a datacenter. - Mensaje original - De: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com Para: users users@ovirt.org Enviados: Jueves, 3 de Enero 2013 17:08:48 Asunto: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar -- Adrián Gibanel I.T. Manager +34 675 683 301 www.btactic.com Ens podeu seguir a/Nos podeis seguir en: i Abans d´imprimir aquest missatge, pensa en el medi ambient. El medi ambient és cosa de tothom. / Antes de imprimir el mensaje piensa en el medio ambiente. El medio ambiente es cosa de todos. AVIS: El contingut d'aquest missatge i els seus annexos és confidencial. Si no en sou el destinatari, us fem saber que està prohibit utilitzar-lo, divulgar-lo i/o copiar-lo sense tenir l'autorització corresponent. Si heu rebut aquest missatge per error, us agrairem que ho feu saber immediatament al remitent i que procediu a destruir el missatge . AVISO: El contenido de este mensaje y de sus anexos es confidencial. Si no es el destinatario, les hacemos saber que está prohibido utilizarlo, divulgarlo y/o copiarlo sin tener la autorización correspondiente. Si han recibido este mensaje por error, les agradeceríamos que lo hagan saber inmediatamente al remitente y que procedan a destruir el mensaje . ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Original Message - From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com To: Soeren Grunewald soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de Cc: users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 11:33:54 AM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors It cannot be supported by KVM in any meaningful way - it requires running VMs as the lowest common denominator which looks and performs more like a Pentium IV. are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? Thanks, Itamar Regards, Soeren Thanks, Itamar [...] [1] http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Migration ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? With offline migration, I means the guest is not running while moving it from one host to another. I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and another called Intel (for the xeon). Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't. I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition. Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu configuration -cpu qemu32 or -cpu qemu64. Regards, Soeren [...] ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. I'm going to second this strongly! Official support would be very much appreciated. Bonus points for supporting a migration from the dreyou packages. No offense to dreyou, of course, just rather be better supported by the official line on Centos 6.x. Better support/integration of windows based SPICE clients would also be much appreciated, I have many end users on Windows, and it's been a chore to keep it working so far. This includes the client drivers for windows VMs to support the SPICE display for multiple displays. More of a client side thing, I know, but a desired feature in my environment. Thanks for the continued progress and support as well! - Darrell Budic Zenfire ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. I'm going to second this strongly! Official support would be very much appreciated. Bonus points for supporting a migration from the dreyou packages. No offense to dreyou, of course, just rather be better supported by the official line on Centos 6.x. and one more for good measure! Better support/integration of windows based SPICE clients would also be much appreciated, I have many end users on Windows, and it's been a chore to keep it working so far. This includes the client drivers for windows VMs to support the SPICE display for multiple displays. More of a client side thing, I know, but a desired feature in my environment. I'd like to see a spice client for Mac - i know of various ports but as of now on 10.8 i have to use VNC which is not ideal. I now spice != ovirt however they are very linked at this time. Thanks for the continued progress and support as well! indeed! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Original Message - From: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net To: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:47:00 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? I'd like to see a spice client for Mac - i know of various ports but as of now on 10.8 i have to use VNC which is not ideal. I now spice != ovirt however they are very linked at this time. What do you mean? a client or a browser plugin? Thanks, Alon. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Original Message - From: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com To: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net Cc: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 12:52:52 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? - Original Message - From: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net To: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:47:00 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? I'd like to see a spice client for Mac - i know of various ports but as of now on 10.8 i have to use VNC which is not ideal. I now spice != ovirt however they are very linked at this time. What do you mean? a client or a browser plugin? There is an early spice client upstream but it still needs to be integrated with oVirt Thanks, Alon. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote: On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and Intel host machines. KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration should be possible. can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration? With offline migration, I means the guest is not running while moving it from one host to another. I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and another called Intel (for the xeon). Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't. I'm not aware that you can't. you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other. yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue? I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition. Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu configuration -cpu qemu32 or -cpu qemu64. Regards, Soeren [...] ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Original Message - From: Andrew Cathrow acath...@redhat.com To: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net Cc: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:58:02 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? - Original Message - From: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com To: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net Cc: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 12:52:52 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? - Original Message - From: Tom Brown t...@ng23.net To: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:47:00 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? I'd like to see a spice client for Mac - i know of various ports but as of now on 10.8 i have to use VNC which is not ideal. I now spice != ovirt however they are very linked at this time. What do you mean? a client or a browser plugin? There is an early spice client upstream but it still needs to be integrated with oVirt If that the case we should solve the non-plugin integration with spice[1] and have easier lives. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843410 Thanks, Alon. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 07:42 PM, Darrell Budic wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. I'm going to second this strongly! Official support would be very much appreciated. Bonus points for supporting a migration from the dreyou packages. No offense to dreyou, of course, just rather be better supported by the official line on Centos 6.x. Better support/integration of windows based SPICE clients would also be much appreciated, I have many end users on Windows, and it's been a chore to keep it working so far. This includes the client drivers for windows VMs to support the SPICE display for multiple displays. More of a client side thing, I know, but a desired feature in my environment. these would be guest drivers for spice, rather than client ones, right? Thanks for the continued progress and support as well! - Darrell Budic Zenfire ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 01/03/2013 10:14 PM, Adrian Gibanel wrote: This is what I'm missing right now in oVirt 3.1: Better GlusterFS support. === 1. Add a checkbox when creating a volume: Set oVirt permissions so that the vdsm : kvm permissions are set. I don't want it to be per-default because I'd like to use Volumes tabs as a Volumes manager for Glusterfs volumes and not only Glusterfs volumes aimed at virtual machines. From: http://blog.jebpages.com/archives/ovirt-3-1-glusterized/ : ( For now, the Gluster volume manager neglects to set brick directory permissions correctly, so after adding bricks on a machine, you have to return to the terminal and run chown -R 36.36 /data (assuming /data is where you are storing your volume bricks) to enable oVirt to write to the volumes. ) This feature is available in 3.2. Enabling a checkbox to optimize gluster volume for oVirt will set vdsm:kvm permissions on bricks that are part of the volume. 2. Add a quota tab in Volumes. So that you can enable/disable/edit its quota: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Enabling_Quota http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Managing_Directory_Quota Noted. We will address this in a subsequent release. Thanks, Vijay ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Mensaje original - De: Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com On 01/03/2013 10:14 PM, Adrian Gibanel wrote: This is what I'm missing right now in oVirt 3.1: Better GlusterFS support. === 1. Add a checkbox when creating a volume: Set oVirt permissions so that the vdsm : kvm permissions are set. I don't want it to be per-default because I'd like to use Volumes tabs as a Volumes manager for Glusterfs volumes and not only Glusterfs volumes aimed at virtual machines. From: http://blog.jebpages.com/archives/ovirt-3-1-glusterized/ : ( For now, the Gluster volume manager neglects to set brick directory permissions correctly, so after adding bricks on a machine, you have to return to the terminal and run chown -R 36.36 /data (assuming /data is where you are storing your volume bricks) to enable oVirt to write to the volumes. ) This feature is available in 3.2. Enabling a checkbox to optimize gluster volume for oVirt will set vdsm:kvm permissions on bricks that are part of the volume. It was more or less obvious the feature was going to be there because seems easy to implement but I couldn't check it yet. Great! 2. Add a quota tab in Volumes. So that you can enable/disable/edit its quota: http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Enabling_Quota http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Managing_Directory_Quota Noted. We will address this in a subsequent release. Cool. Thanks, Vijay As other have stated in other emails thank you for oVirt and the support you give in many ways. -- -- Adrián Gibanel I.T. Manager +34 675 683 301 www.btactic.com Ens podeu seguir a/Nos podeis seguir en: i Abans d´imprimir aquest missatge, pensa en el medi ambient. El medi ambient és cosa de tothom. / Antes de imprimir el mensaje piensa en el medio ambiente. El medio ambiente es cosa de todos. AVIS: El contingut d'aquest missatge i els seus annexos és confidencial. Si no en sou el destinatari, us fem saber que està prohibit utilitzar-lo, divulgar-lo i/o copiar-lo sense tenir l'autorització corresponent. Si heu rebut aquest missatge per error, us agrairem que ho feu saber immediatament al remitent i que procediu a destruir el missatge . AVISO: El contenido de este mensaje y de sus anexos es confidencial. Si no es el destinatario, les hacemos saber que está prohibido utilizarlo, divulgarlo y/o copiarlo sin tener la autorización correspondiente. Si han recibido este mensaje por error, les agradeceríamos que lo hagan saber inmediatamente al remitente y que procedan a destruir el mensaje . ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Jan 3, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:42 PM, Darrell Budic wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Better support/integration of windows based SPICE clients would also be much appreciated, I have many end users on Windows, and it's been a chore to keep it working so far. This includes the client drivers for windows VMs to support the SPICE display for multiple displays. More of a client side thing, I know, but a desired feature in my environment. these would be guest drivers for spice, rather than client ones, right? Yes, I should have said guest drivers for spice, mixing my throughs on spice clients with the guest VMs themselves. Best way I can think of to describe it would be the ovirt equivalent of rhev-guest-tools-iso-3.0-37.noarch.rpm or whatever version they are on now. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
- Original Message - From: Darrell Budic darrell.bu...@zenfire.com To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com Cc: users@oVirt.org users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:02:31 PM Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next? On Jan 3, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:42 PM, Darrell Budic wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Better support/integration of windows based SPICE clients would also be much appreciated, I have many end users on Windows, and it's been a chore to keep it working so far. This includes the client drivers for windows VMs to support the SPICE display for multiple displays. More of a client side thing, I know, but a desired feature in my environment. these would be guest drivers for spice, rather than client ones, right? Yes, I should have said guest drivers for spice, mixing my throughs on spice clients with the guest VMs themselves. Best way I can think of to describe it would be the ovirt equivalent of rhev-guest-tools-iso-3.0-37.noarch.rpm or whatever version they are on now. spice-spice upstream has a guest tools installer that includes the inguest drivers - signed but not WHQL'd. http://www.spice-space.org/download/binaries/spice-guest-tools/spice-guest-tools-0.3.exe ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Dear Itamar, I would like to add a request for the new upper coming version 3.2 if possible: Although some of you use spice instead of VNC, as I am an Ubuntu user on my desktop and laptop, spice protocol is not working withing my OS; even if I tried to build it from source, search unofficial deb packs or convert if from rpm packages. I know spice is strongly supported on the Fedora community, but I, myself on the server side work on RH Enterprise and Centos, but as for desktop use, I have a very hard time make the spice plugin for firefox to work. Therefore for my solution I had setup a VNC reflector + some shell automation to make it work between 2 different subnets (one inside and one outside) -- this, somehow, adding to the initial scope. This would have been much more easier to have a VNC proxy inside the ovirt engine function, from where to make the necessary setups and assignments of the console to each VM, or even though I might sound funny to make a solution as vrde on Vbox, because works damn great and it's easy to setup or change. Last question, If I might ask, when is the 3.2 planned to be released (aprox)? Cordially, Alex. On 01/03/2013 06:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
Hii I think a IPAM is mandatory, so that the VM can grab their IP without human configuration. Kévin 2013/1/3 Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar __**_ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/usershttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Kevin Mazière Responsable Infrastructure Alter Way – Hosting 1 rue Royal - 227 Bureaux de la Colline 92213 Saint-Cloud Cedex Tél : +33 (0)1 41 16 38 41 Mob : +33 (0)7 62 55 57 05 http://www.alterway.fr ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On 03.01.2013 23:13, Moran Goldboim wrote: On 01/03/2013 07:42 PM, Darrell Budic wrote: On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages. I'm going to second this strongly! Official support would be very much appreciated. Bonus points for supporting a migration from the dreyou packages. No offense to dreyou, of course, just rather be better supported by the official line on Centos 6.x. EL6 rpms are planned to be delivered with 3.2 GA version, and nightly builds from there on. hopefully we can push it to 3.2 beta. Moran. Great news! Thanks a lot. Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: Hi Everyone, as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in coming versions? Thanks, Itamar Hi, Deploying multiple VMs from 1 template at the same time. Currently you have to wait until the template image is available again. Best regards, Vincent ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users