Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Meiser


On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same arugement.   Is this something that should be addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous times.  Why is this? does it put a black eye  the promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time does this stiffle the creativity?has it created a hierarchary instead of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems that it's not making the most positive impression.   I am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me to mention any personal feelings I welcome that also.MickFirst of all I have to agree... this is a great topic... or rather when we shift away from talking about something we can't control... the press... something I'm not even sure why we're obsessed about... what with our being our own media and all... this becomes an very interesting topic... one we should talk about from time to time. That said...Well, since Josh Leo went from ranting about "a-list" to being one of the most popular vloggers I don't think it's as big an issue as people would make it out to be. But let's analyze anyway shall we? :)Where does this "a-list" establishment embed itself?1) our vlogrolls?2) directories - most popular?3) FireAnt's 10 default feeds?4) the recycled hot list of names used in previous articles on vloggers in the lexis nexus dbase?5) Where else? Our minds?or is it just active participants in the vlogosphere1) people who post videos a lot?2) people who chat here a lot?3) people who get active in lots of projects?4) or simply people who make videos people love?What else determines visibility... what else embeds the status quo into the system. What else indoctrinates?How can we break the status quo?As an example... Mefeedia is developing things like favoring, tagging, reviewing, and re-vlogging (aka. their "blog this" tool) so that anyone can quickly find and just as easily promote new vlogs and videos. And we're helping you do it because it helps us build a better directory... which is the vision of "social media"... self helping, self made... like wikipedia or any wiki... but different in form.Sure there's still a way to see the most popular video feeds... but we can't deny people that, it has it's utility. What we can do is develop tools that create "churn"... that agitate the status quo... so that the mix of vlogs doesn't become a homogenized flow of same same...  and meanwhile you can do the same... the best way of course it revlogging... promote other peoples videos... keep an up to date vlog roll.It's no secrete that re-vlogging is ALL I do with my blog... what's more I seek out other projects like evilvlog.com to "re-contextualize" and challenge norms and expectations... Evilvlog is now a wild and chaotic churn of media coming from all over the vlogosphere and we're going to keep adding adding editors until it implodes.. and/or people start creating their own "evilvlogs"... seek out people of shared interest and start your own multi-person vlog or blog and let's decentralize this conversation on this yahoo group a little... because it in my mind is perhaps the one thing most responsible for this cliquish insider feeling... that new visitors get... it's well beyond it's capacity... that said perhaps I shouldn't even be posting here... but to say... disperse.. find or build new fertile lands for conversation... it's completely within your power.BTW, some other ideas on creating more churn, in addition to AWSOME collaborative re-vlogging.Perhaps mefeedia and fireant should both create _javascript_ objects for dropping in the right hand sidebar of a vlog that would contain a list of vlogs one is currently subscribed to on mefeedia or fire ant... An up to the minute vlog roll.Perhaps also a tool for displaying the items in one's personal queue of media or playlist... to put in the right hand side bar of their vlog.Perhaps also a tool for displaying my recently favorited or tagged videos in the right hand side bar of my vlog.FireANT, Vlogdir, Blip, Audi blog and others might find ways to follow suit.These things like live vlog rolls would have a TREMENDOUS impact on search traffic and traffic flow. I would absolutely love to see what Steve Garfield, Ryanne, and Josh Leo and indeed all my friends are subscribed to at any different moment, what their tagging, what they're favoriting.  All this on the face of their vlog. The search engines would go NUTS!  I encourage you to look for other ways of promoting the mix and churn.The solution to this issue in my mind lies in ongoing work around the following fundamental systematic / architectural question.How can we drive traffic out to the edges of the network and 

[videoblogging] holographic data storage

2005-12-17 Thread Kath O'Donnell



I remember reading about holographic storage / crystalline data storage
in the mid 90s but back then they could write the data but couldn't
read it back off. seems like they've fixed the problems according to
the tests run last november. looking forward to the personal
device using these to be available.. they've been doing tests with
broadcasters for hdtv and the like. 

http://www.hiptechblog.com/2005/11/25/maxell-introduces-groundbreaking-holographic-recording-technology

http://www.inphase-technologies.com/



			
Maxell Introduces Groundbreaking Holographic Recording Technology
			November 25th, 2005 

| Posted in Computer Technology by Leon Huang

			

			
			


			



			
	


	
Up to 1.6-terabytes (or 1,600 1638-gigabytes for those who can't count) and transfer rates reaching 120 MBPS (megabytes, not bits!), Maxell's latest holographic technology
 is a real breakthrough in optical media.

	
	
Made possible together with InPhase Technologies, each of these 5¼-inch disks can hold as much data as 63 DVDs.
It offers a 50+ years of archive life and is expected to have the
lowest cost per gigabyte compared to any other commercial removable
storage in the current market.

	
"Combining high
storage densities and fast transfer rates with durable, reliable, low
cost media, Holographic technology is poised to become a compelling
choice for next-generation storage and content distribution needs,"
said Liz Murphy, vice president of marketing for InPhase Technologies.
"Unlike other technologies that record one data bit at a time,
holography allows a million bits of data to be written and read in
parallel with a single flash of light. This enables transfer rates
significantly higher than current optical storage devices."
	- Maxell-USA.com

	


	
The
first generation of this holographic media will come in only
300-gigabytes of storage capacity, and with a 20 MBPS transfer rate.
Scheduled for release in late 2006, this will be one thing pr0n collectors optical storage fanatics will want to look out for.

	
[via OhGizmo!]







-- http://www.aliak.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Michael I



Phenomenal response! Lets bring this together, expose the trials and triumphs. Your only as good as the tools provided and your only as good as the people around you.   What can be done to neutralize the negative emotions around this subject? Is this a medium that can change perception?   How easy it for us to find good content and make new people feel welcome? With so many variables, where or how can this been taken to the next level?  Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same arugement.Is this something that
 should be addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous times.Why is this? does it put a black eye the promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time does this stiffle the creativity?has it created a hierarchary instead of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems that it's not making the most positive impression. I am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me to mention any personal feelings I welcome that also.MickFirst of all I have to agree... this is a great topic... or rather when we shift away from talking about something we can't control... the press... something I'm not even sure why
 we're obsessed about... what with our being our own media and all... this becomes an very interesting topic... one we should talk about from time to time.That said...Well, since Josh Leo went from ranting about "a-list" to being one of the most popular vloggers I don't think it's as big an issue as people would make it out to be. But let's analyze anyway shall we? :)Where does this "a-list" establishment embed itself?1) our vlogrolls?2) directories - most popular?3) FireAnt's 10 default feeds?4) the recycled hot list of names used in previous articles on vloggers in the lexis nexus dbase?5) Where else? Our minds?or is it just active participants in the vlogosphere1) people who post videos a lot?2) people who chat here a lot?3) people who get active in lots of projects?4) or simply people who make videos people love?What else determines visibility... what else embeds the status quo into the system. What else indoctrinates?How can we break the status quo?As an example... Mefeedia is developing things like favoring, tagging, reviewing, and re-vlogging (aka. their "blog this" tool) so that anyone can quickly find and just as easily promote new vlogs and videos. And we're helping you do it because it helps us build a better directory... which is the vision of "social media"... self helping, self made... like wikipedia or any wiki... but different in form.Sure there's still a way to see the mostpopular video feeds... but we can't deny people that, it has it's utility. What we can do is develop tools that create "churn"... that agitate the status quo... so that the mix of vlogs doesn't become a homogenized flow of same same... and meanwhile you can do the same... the best way of course it revlogging... promote other peoples videos... keep an up to date vlog roll.It's no secrete that re-vlogging is ALL I do with my blog... what's more I seek out other projects like evilvlog.com to "re-contextualize" and challenge norms and expectations... Evilvlog is now a wild andchaotic churn of media coming from all over the vlogosphere and we're going to keep adding adding editorsuntil it implodes.. and/or people start creating their own "evilvlogs"... seek out people of shared interest and start your own multi-person vlog or
 blog and let's decentralize this conversation on this yahoo group a little... because it inmy mind is perhaps the one thing most responsible for this cliquish insider feeling... that new visitors get... it's well beyond it's capacity... that said perhaps I shouldn't even be posting here... but to say... disperse.. find or build new fertile lands for conversation... it's completely within your power.BTW, some other ideas on creating more churn, in addition to AWSOME collaborative re-vlogging.Perhaps mefeedia and fireant should both create _javascript_ objects for dropping in the right hand sidebar of a vlog that would contain a list of vlogs one is currently subscribed to on mefeedia or fire ant... An up to the minute vlog roll.Perhaps also a tool for displaying the items in one's personal queue of media or
 playlist... to put in the right hand side bar of their vlog.Perhaps also a tool for displaying my recently favorited or tagged videos in the right hand side bar of my vlog.FireANT, Vlogdir, Blip, Audi blog and others mightfind ways to follow suit.These things like live vlog rolls would have a TREMENDOUS impact on search traffic and traffic flow. I would absolutely love to see what Steve 

[videoblogging] just wanted to share this / found it in my lifehackers feed.

2005-12-17 Thread DOUG
Free program iSquint converts your AVI and MPEG video files to iPod-
compatible MP4 files.



http://homepage.mac.com/tylerl82/







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
There's been a idea that has been promoted to not define
Videoblogging.  That it is too soon, that defining it will lock it
down and constrain it, and so on.  The error is that a model,
definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable.  You
don't discover something by not applying a model to it, but by testing
if a proposed model accurately describes the item in question.

The video projects that are interesting and successful whether the
highly structured Rocket Boom or loosely structured Carp Caviar, have
a understandable structure.  Experimental films have existed since
Edison and others invented the technology of filmmaking.  But it
became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the
60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation.  Within that
clear models of genres and forms -- the science fiction, crime (with
subgenre of noire), romance (subgenres of romantic-comedy, etc.),
comedy, etc. sub-models --- resolved into modes of film expression.  

It is a mistake to narrowly define an art form.  To say that
videoblogging is just personal diaries or citizen journalism or
another type of genre expression.  This is like saying film is
adventure.  It may be that adventure (or romantic or crime) films are
the most prevalent genres, but they are not the only genres that can
exist and are interesting.  It is the form of a duration around 90
minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.  And it
is a video with blogging capability that may be the correct model that
different genres of videoblogging exist in.  That model may be
incomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested against
competing models until the correct model is determined.  Saying that
no model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for floundering
and stagnation.

  -- Enric






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Jan





For the record, I don't ever want a *job and yes, vlogging *is 
in most respects my life. I've been working toward creating things that are 
served by what vlogging offers since I was but a wee lass in saddle 
shoes.

If you feel on the outside ask yourself this: why do you 
begrudge folks who make vlogging their life and livlihood and the attention that 
has brought them? 

Churn. Yes. Definitely helps to bring new, talented folks to 
the top of the pot.Most of the directories have restructured their sites 
to feature new vloggers. What more do you want?

As MM points out, becoming part of the community, posting 
regularly, being active in lots of groups and community effortswill bring 
you up through the ranks. All the popular vloggers have done this and more, and 
worked tirelessly to create this community. If you are new here you have no idea 
the time and effort they have invested. 

If what you want is to walk through the door and be lifted 
upon others' shoulders and given a gratuitous round of "For he's a jolly good 
fellow," forget it. It's not going to happen without work. Lots of work. If you 
think that "posting" to this or any list community means posting your URL and 
telling folks to visit your vlog it's not going to work. Share your expertise. 
Do something. Anything. But make it open source and on some level 
selfless.

As I'm fond of saying, "Work hard; use the proper 
tools."

When did it become a sin to promote friends and family? You 
want me to promote you? Do some small thing for me and then I will. No question. 
You want me to promote you? Become my friend. That means talk with me, promote 
me, help me, console and advise me. I will do the same for you.

Videoblogging is not television, nor is it Hollywood. We have 
yet to discover a vlog-voice in terms of what styles fit best in a 320 x 240 or 
smaller screen in 3 minutes or less. We have yet to discover a way to have vlog 
conversations, link-love, and quotations, back-and-forthing as simple as 
bloggers do that. I think the style will be closeups on faces and things. Good 
sound design. Good, compact ideas. In short, the short film closer 
in.

It is still very early in the game, folks.

Cooperation and community rule.

Gettin' off my low pony now.

XOXOX,
Jan

-- "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ 
- Road Node 101http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - 
motionhttp://blog.urbanartadventures.com 
- soundhttp://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - 
communityhttp://the-hold.blogspot.com - 
literature.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Michael I 
  
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:54 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall 
  Street Journal: Videoblogging
  
  Phenomenal response!Lets bring this together, 
  expose the trials and triumphs.Your only as good as the tools provided and 
  your only as good as the people around you. What can be done to 
  neutralize the negative emotions around this subject?Is this a 
  medium that can change perception? How easy it for us to find 
  good content and make new people feel welcome?With so many variables, 
  where or how can this been taken to the next level?Michael 
  Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  


  On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:
  Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time 
  back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same 
  arugement.Is this something that should be 
  addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's 
  complaint here has been metioned numerous times.Why is 
  this? does it put a black eye the promotion of videoblogging? Do 
  arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new 
  "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time 
  does this stiffle the creativity?has it created a hierarchary instead 
  of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems 
  that it's not making the most positive impression. I 
  am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me 
  to mention any personal feelings I welcome that 
  also.Mick

First of all I have to agree... this is a great topic... or rather when 
we shift away from talking about something we can't control... the press... 
something I'm not even sure why we're obsessed about... what with our being 
our own media and all... this becomes an very interesting topic... one we 
should talk about from time to time.That said...

Well, since Josh Leo went from ranting about "a-list" to being one of 
the most popular vloggers I don't think it's as big an issue as people would 
make it out to be. But let's analyze anyway shall we? :)

Where does this "a-list" establishment embed itself?

1) our vlogrolls?
2) directories - most popular?

3) FireAnt's 10 

[videoblogging] video guide to Providence

2005-12-17 Thread DOUG
hi folks 

I am still using my cheap kiddie cam but I have a real camcorder on 
the way.
I have decided to do vlogs about my new hometown Providence RI. I am in 
love with Providence after living in Nyc for twenty years. Here are my 
feeble attempts at vlogging about Providence. More to come.

http://www.youtube.com/my_videos.php



http://dougri.blip.tv/







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But it
 became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the
 60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation.

'The Birth of a Nation' goes for 187 minutes.

Just for the record.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It is the form of a duration around 90
 minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.

This is so wrong it's not funny.

The length criterion (not to mention the absurd narrative-biased three
act structure criterion) completely disregards almost the entire
avant-garde movement, many films of which are decidedly more cinematic
than the narrative films you see to think define cinema (see Brakhage,
Breer, Mekas, Deren, VanDerBeek, Fischinger, Richter, and so on). It
also disregards masterpieces like 'Les Vampires' (399 min), Tarr's
'Sátántangó' (450 min), Lanzmann's 'Shoah' (544 min), and Rivette's
'Out 1' (729 min). I can assure you that these are among the most
cinematic films of all time.

The three act structure criterion doesn't just disregard films from
the avant-garde, either, but narrative films with one act (short
films), two acts ('Sleuth'), four ('Shoah'), more ('Playtime'), and so
on, as well. Again, all incredibly cinematic films.

Your definition of cinematic form seems to me to speak only of your
very limited understanding of everything that cinema is and can be.

It's like saying that literature is defined by novels of approximately
four hundred pages in length, as opposed to by words, any number of
them, arranged to make meaning, or to create aesthetic effect, no
more, no less.

It's like saying that music is defined by four quarter time
compositions that run for approximately three or four minutes and have
lyrics, often which rhyme, as opposed to by sounds, arranged by tone,
timbre, quality, and so on, for any length of time, again for some
sort of aesthetic effect, pleasurable or intentionally otherwise.

It's like saying that visual art is defined by one type of paint, on
canvas, hung on a wall somewhere in France, as opposed to by shapes,
colours, textures, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

You see where I'm going.

Cinema is not defined--not in any way, shape or form--by films with
ninety minute running times and three act (narrative) structures.

It is defined by moving images (occasionally accompanied by sounds)
existing (they don't even have to be arranged) in time. Cinema is
time-based images.

This post has nothing to do with videoblogging (it could, but I'm
tired and want to go to bed), but I'll stand up for cinema until my
bloody, no doubt premature death. All I can say is that if our
definitions of videoblogging are as restrictive and reductive as this
definition of cinema, then we're simply not the right people to be
developing it--in fact, I'd argue that we'd be hindering it far more
than we'd be helping it.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] video guide to Providence

2005-12-17 Thread Joshua Seiden



Doug,

I enjoyed those. I've been driving through Providence for years,
stopping only occasionally for breakfast near Brown. Good to see some
other parts of the city.

You should definately link your videos into the map!

http://wayfaring.com/maps/show/2721

(It looks like it's centered on NYC, but only because I've just started
linking in my videos. Help grow the map by adding your links.)

JSOn 12/17/05, DOUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi folksI am still using my cheap kiddie cam but I have a real camcorder onthe way.I have decided to do vlogs about my new hometown Providence RI. I am inlove with Providence after living in Nyc for twenty years. Here are my
feeble attempts at vlogging about Providence. More to come.





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Chuck Olsen

Warning - do not step into the ring with Matt Clayfield
on matters of the cinema. You will get served.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It is the form of a duration around 90
  minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.
 
 This is so wrong it's not funny.
 
 The length criterion (not to mention the absurd narrative-biased three
 act structure criterion) completely disregards almost the entire
 avant-garde movement, many films of which are decidedly more cinematic
 than the narrative films you see to think define cinema (see Brakhage,
 Breer, Mekas, Deren, VanDerBeek, Fischinger, Richter, and so on). It
 also disregards masterpieces like 'Les Vampires' (399 min), Tarr's
 'Sátántangó' (450 min), Lanzmann's 'Shoah' (544 min), and Rivette's
 'Out 1' (729 min). I can assure you that these are among the most
 cinematic films of all time.
 
 The three act structure criterion doesn't just disregard films from
 the avant-garde, either, but narrative films with one act (short
 films), two acts ('Sleuth'), four ('Shoah'), more ('Playtime'), and so
 on, as well. Again, all incredibly cinematic films.
 
 Your definition of cinematic form seems to me to speak only of your
 very limited understanding of everything that cinema is and can be.
 
 It's like saying that literature is defined by novels of approximately
 four hundred pages in length, as opposed to by words, any number of
 them, arranged to make meaning, or to create aesthetic effect, no
 more, no less.
 
 It's like saying that music is defined by four quarter time
 compositions that run for approximately three or four minutes and have
 lyrics, often which rhyme, as opposed to by sounds, arranged by tone,
 timbre, quality, and so on, for any length of time, again for some
 sort of aesthetic effect, pleasurable or intentionally otherwise.
 
 It's like saying that visual art is defined by one type of paint, on
 canvas, hung on a wall somewhere in France, as opposed to by shapes,
 colours, textures, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
 
 You see where I'm going.
 
 Cinema is not defined--not in any way, shape or form--by films with
 ninety minute running times and three act (narrative) structures.
 
 It is defined by moving images (occasionally accompanied by sounds)
 existing (they don't even have to be arranged) in time. Cinema is
 time-based images.
 
 This post has nothing to do with videoblogging (it could, but I'm
 tired and want to go to bed), but I'll stand up for cinema until my
 bloody, no doubt premature death. All I can say is that if our
 definitions of videoblogging are as restrictive and reductive as this
 definition of cinema, then we're simply not the right people to be
 developing it--in fact, I'd argue that we'd be hindering it far more
 than we'd be helping it.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] holographic data storage

2005-12-17 Thread David Meade



SA-WEET!

... the treckie in me just wept a little ...

- Dave
http://www.davidmeade.com



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Markus Sandy
oxymoron alert!

there is no such thing as a correct model
otherwise it would not be a model

all models are approximations
someday even physicist's will realize this and stop looking for the 
right one

once a model is stamped correct, all you have is dogma

Enric wrote:

That model may be
incomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested against
competing models until the correct model is determined.  Saying that
no model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for floundering
and stagnation.

  -- Enric

  



-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
It is more useful to have a model that applies somewhat than no model
at all.

  -- Enric

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 oxymoron alert!
 
 there is no such thing as a correct model
 otherwise it would not be a model
 
 all models are approximations
 someday even physicist's will realize this and stop looking for the 
 right one
 
 once a model is stamped correct, all you have is dogma
 
 Enric wrote:
 
 That model may be
 incomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested against
 competing models until the correct model is determined.  Saying that
 no model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for floundering
 and stagnation.
 
   -- Enric
 
   
 
 
 
 -- 
 
 My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
 
 http://apperceptions.org
 http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
 http://node101.org
 http://spinflow.org
 http://wearethemedia.com
 http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com
 
 aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 skype: msandy
 spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  But it
  became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the
  60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation.
 
 'The Birth of a Nation' goes for 187 minutes.
 
 Just for the record.


From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6305130949/104-5203272-5767925?v=glancen=130:


Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.


 -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It is the form of a duration around 90
  minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.
 
 This is so wrong it's not funny.
 
 The length criterion (not to mention the absurd narrative-biased three
 act structure criterion) completely disregards almost the entire
 avant-garde movement, many films of which are decidedly more cinematic
 than the narrative films you see to think define cinema (see Brakhage,
 Breer, Mekas, Deren, VanDerBeek, Fischinger, Richter, and so on). It
 also disregards masterpieces like 'Les Vampires' (399 min), Tarr's
 'Sátántangó' (450 min), Lanzmann's 'Shoah' (544 min), and Rivette's
 'Out 1' (729 min). I can assure you that these are among the most
 cinematic films of all time.
 
 The three act structure criterion doesn't just disregard films from
 the avant-garde, either, but narrative films with one act (short
 films), two acts ('Sleuth'), four ('Shoah'), more ('Playtime'), and so
 on, as well. Again, all incredibly cinematic films.
 
 Your definition of cinematic form seems to me to speak only of your
 very limited understanding of everything that cinema is and can be.
 
 It's like saying that literature is defined by novels of approximately
 four hundred pages in length, as opposed to by words, any number of
 them, arranged to make meaning, or to create aesthetic effect, no
 more, no less.
 
 It's like saying that music is defined by four quarter time
 compositions that run for approximately three or four minutes and have
 lyrics, often which rhyme, as opposed to by sounds, arranged by tone,
 timbre, quality, and so on, for any length of time, again for some
 sort of aesthetic effect, pleasurable or intentionally otherwise.
 
 It's like saying that visual art is defined by one type of paint, on
 canvas, hung on a wall somewhere in France, as opposed to by shapes,
 colours, textures, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
 
 You see where I'm going.
 
 Cinema is not defined--not in any way, shape or form--by films with
 ninety minute running times and three act (narrative) structures.
 
 It is defined by moving images (occasionally accompanied by sounds)
 existing (they don't even have to be arranged) in time. Cinema is
 time-based images.

Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined.
 But a start.  I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of
videoblogging.  Just that it is more useful to have a workable
definition than none.

  -- Enric

 
 This post has nothing to do with videoblogging (it could, but I'm
 tired and want to go to bed), but I'll stand up for cinema until my
 bloody, no doubt premature death. All I can say is that if our
 definitions of videoblogging are as restrictive and reductive as this
 definition of cinema, then we're simply not the right people to be
 developing it--in fact, I'd argue that we'd be hindering it far more
 than we'd be helping it.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] block by block video

2005-12-17 Thread Randolfe Wicker





Joshua, it is so rare to have someone else take 
your idea and turn it into reality. I've always been one with many ideas 
and not enough time or energy or money for follow-through.

This is a great idea! In fact, I've always 
toyed with the idea of having a "travel" TV show in which people who had visited 
a place would just sit on a panel and discuss what the place was like (with 
video and pictures). You have that here, in a way, but it has an "on 
demand" feature universal to vlogs!

I'll certainly set out and do a short piece on 
Hoboken, NJ--which is a bedroom community for Manhattan and has become the Ft. 
Lauderdale of New Jersey where all the young people gather to 
party.

I've always been amazed at how difficult it really 
is to get a feeling for a place from travel guides and brochures, etc. 
Vlogs will be especially good. I certainly got a feeling for what 
Providence, RI is like from Doug's vlogs.

Randolfe (Randy) Wicker

Videographer, Writer, ActivistAdvisor: The Immortality 
InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Joshua 
  Seiden 
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 10:43 
  PM
  Subject: [videoblogging] block by block 
  video
  I'd like to invite you all to help create a collaborative 
  videoblog neighborhood guide. I've kicked it off here: http://wayfaring.com/maps/show/2721A few weeks ago, 
  Randy Wicker shared an idea to create a video guide to our cities, towns, and 
  neighborhoods. I thought, why not? I found a site that allows you to create 
  community maps, and I've created one and linked to a few of my more 
  place-based videos.A couple of thoughts:1. Right now, I've made no 
  attempt to be "guide-like" in any way. I've just linked to some videos that I 
  think give a sense of place. So it's more of an evocative guide than a factual 
  one. But who knows how/if this will evolve?2. This seems like an obvious 
  extension of vlogmap. I love vlogmap, but since it only maps entire vlogs not 
  individual posts, it didn't seem as if it could accomplish the same thing. 
  Perhaps someday...So...do you know something about a place? Add it to 
  the map! (Just get yourself a free account on wayfaring.com, then edit the map.)I 
  hope you'll all participate and/or share your thoughts.JS---http://more3.blogspot.com




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] block by block video

2005-12-17 Thread Joshua Seiden



Glad you like it! Hope we can get some momentum going. 

It would be cool to be out on a trip in some anonymous city, (NY,
Providence, Hoboken, Davis) staying in a hotel, and to be able to go to
the map and see what different neighborhoods are like, based on the
videos people have posted to the map.

JSOn 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:









Joshua, it is so rare to have someone else take 
your idea and turn it into reality. I've always been one with many ideas 
and not enough time or energy or money for follow-through.
 






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] block by block video

2005-12-17 Thread Adam Quirk



On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll certainly set out and do a short piece on 
Hoboken, NJ--which is a bedroom community for Manhattan and has become the Ft. 
Lauderdale of New Jersey where all the young people gather to 
party.
You make it sound much more exciting than it is :)
The Hoboken I know isn't really a place to party. It's where I
work, go to Biaggio's Deli for pastrami sandwiches at lunch, buy cheap
fruit and veggies at the greengrocer on 3rd and Washington, and
generally get along with the older Italian and Jewish inhabitants
better than I get along with the Ugg-wearing fashionistas or the
strutting Wall Street greasers that pour out of the PATH station
between 6 and 7 every evening.

I do agree that young people gather to party here though.

And this idea is a good one. I just signed up for wayfaring.com. I'll try to get something together. 

AQ
bullemhead.com






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Markus Sandy
 Enric wrote:

It is more useful to have a model that applies somewhat than no model
at all.

  -- Enric
  


i can't say i agree with that enric

i think vlogs are more like canvas...

i looked up the definition of canvas a few times
all the ones i found were pretty lame
and they have no bearing on what i might do artistically

canvas is important to me for what it supports and how it can be used, 
not for how it's defined
i am constantly finding new interpretations and uses of canvas

attempting to model what i can do with canvas just seems limiting

however, if you want a good definition of videoblogging, then listen to 
jonny goldstein's recent interview with Douglass Rushkoff

videoblogging is the opportunity missed by current tv

LOL

http://wearethemedia.com/2005/12/16/rushkoff-on-videoblogging/


markus




-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] just wanted to share this / found it in my lifehackers feed.

2005-12-17 Thread Randolfe Wicker





Thanks for this lead to a free program for 
converting MPEG  AVI files.

I've never understood what/why the reasons are for 
people putting "free programs" on the Internet. I understand some Linux 
users who passionately like the idea of open-source sharing. However, what 
is the reason for someone making iSquint available? There has to be an 
"economic game plan" involved in all of this.

Likewise, I wonder what the economic game plan is 
for these sites that offer free hosting of videos or free services 
aggregating?

Randolfe (Randy) Wickerhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  DOUG 
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:36 
  AM
  Subject: [videoblogging] just wanted to 
  share this / found it in my lifehackers feed.
  Free program iSquint converts your AVI and MPEG video files 
  to iPod-compatible MP4 files.http://homepage.mac.com/tylerl82/




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Randolfe Wicker





I don't understand the need to "strictly define" 
videoblogging except to separate individually (or collectively) produced 
"independent"video from advertising trailers promoting a commercial 
product (movie trailers, etc.) The independence of unfettered personal 
_expression_ is key to defining vlogging in my mind.

Randolfe (Randy) Wickerhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Enric 
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:57 
  AM
  Subject: [videoblogging] Define 
  Videoblogging
  There's been a idea that has been promoted to not 
  defineVideoblogging. That it is too soon, that defining it will lock 
  itdown and constrain it, and so on. The error is that a 
  model,definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable. 
  Youdon't discover something by not applying a model to it, but by 
  testingif a proposed model accurately describes the item in 
  question.The video projects that are interesting and successful 
  whether thehighly structured Rocket Boom or loosely structured Carp 
  Caviar, havea understandable structure. Experimental films have 
  existed sinceEdison and others invented the technology of 
  filmmaking. But itbecame a vibrant media once Griffith found and 
  clearly displayed the60-120 minute, three act model in "Birth of a 
  Nation". Within thatclear models of genres and forms -- the science 
  fiction, crime (withsubgenre of noire), romance (subgenres of 
  romantic-comedy, etc.),comedy, etc. sub-models --- resolved into modes of 
  film _expression_. It is a mistake to narrowly define an art 
  form. To say thatvideoblogging is just personal diaries or citizen 
  journalism oranother type of genre _expression_. This is like saying 
  film isadventure. It may be that adventure (or romantic or crime) 
  films arethe most prevalent genres, but they are not the only genres that 
  canexist and are interesting. It is the form of a duration around 
  90minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form. And 
  itis a video with blogging capability that may be the correct model 
  thatdifferent genres of videoblogging exist in. That model may 
  beincomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested 
  againstcompeting models until the correct model is determined. 
  Saying thatno model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for 
  flounderingand stagnation. -- Enric

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Randolfe Wicker





I want to second all that Jan has said. When 
I first stumbled onto the world of vlogging, she was one of the first people to 
take the trouble to respond to my questions about cameras, computers, 
etc.

She is someone who has slaved selfishly to help 
build this community. And she, so far as I know, has gotten little 
attention or public appreciation for her efforts. Her reward has been in 
the warm good feelings she has earned in helping others and being part of this 
community.

She talks about riding a horse. I think of 
her as modern day Joan of Arc. Let's just hope they don't burn her at the 
stake someday in one of these ugly flame wars.
Randolfe (Randy) Wickerhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jan 

  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:56 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall 
  Street Journal: Videoblogging
  
  For the record, I don't ever want a *job and yes, vlogging 
  *is in most respects my life. I've been working toward creating things that 
  are served by what vlogging offers since I was but a wee lass in saddle 
  shoes.
  
  If you feel on the outside ask yourself this: why do you 
  begrudge folks who make vlogging their life and livlihood and the attention 
  that has brought them? 
  
  Churn. Yes. Definitely helps to bring new, talented folks to 
  the top of the pot.Most of the directories have restructured their sites 
  to feature new vloggers. What more do you want?
  
  As MM points out, becoming part of the community, posting 
  regularly, being active in lots of groups and community effortswill 
  bring you up through the ranks. All the popular vloggers have done this and 
  more, and worked tirelessly to create this community. If you are new here you 
  have no idea the time and effort they have invested. 
  
  If what you want is to walk through the door and be lifted 
  upon others' shoulders and given a gratuitous round of "For he's a jolly good 
  fellow," forget it. It's not going to happen without work. Lots of work. If 
  you think that "posting" to this or any list community means posting your URL 
  and telling folks to visit your vlog it's not going to work. Share your 
  expertise. Do something. Anything. But make it open source and on some level 
  selfless.
  
  As I'm fond of saying, "Work hard; use the proper 
  tools."
  
  When did it become a sin to promote friends and family? You 
  want me to promote you? Do some small thing for me and then I will. No 
  question. You want me to promote you? Become my friend. That means talk with 
  me, promote me, help me, console and advise me. I will do the same for 
  you.
  
  Videoblogging is not television, nor is it Hollywood. We 
  have yet to discover a vlog-voice in terms of what styles fit best in a 320 x 
  240 or smaller screen in 3 minutes or less. We have yet to discover a way to 
  have vlog conversations, link-love, and quotations, back-and-forthing as 
  simple as bloggers do that. I think the style will be closeups on faces and 
  things. Good sound design. Good, compact ideas. In short, the short film 
  closer in.
  
  It is still very early in the game, folks.
  
  Cooperation and community rule.
  
  Gettin' off my low pony now.
  
  XOXOX,
  Jan
  
  -- "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ 
  - Road Node 101http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - 
  motionhttp://blog.urbanartadventures.com 
  - soundhttp://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - 
  communityhttp://the-hold.blogspot.com - 
  literature.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Michael I 

To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:54 
AM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall 
Street Journal: Videoblogging

Phenomenal response!Lets bring this together, 
expose the trials and triumphs.Your only as good as the tools provided 
and your only as good as the people around you. What can be done to 
neutralize the negative emotions around this subject?Is this a 
medium that can change perception? How easy it for us to find 
good content and make new people feel welcome?With so many variables, 
where or how can this been taken to the next level?Michael 
Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

  
  
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:
Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time 
back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same 
arugement.Is this something that should be 
addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading 
Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous 
times.Why is this? does it put a black eye the 
promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in 
peoples mouths? With this new "media" are people struggling to stay at 
the top? and in 

[videoblogging] Bi-Weekly Vlog Videoconference, 12/17/2005, 3:00 pm

2005-12-17 Thread videoblogging













My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page










	

   
 
  
 
   

   

 Reminder from 
  the Calendar of videoblogging
  

  

 
   

   
 
  

  
	   		   Bi-Weekly Vlog Videoconference
	   		   
   
		   Saturday December 17, 2005
   3:00 pm
	   		   - 5:00 pm
	   		   
	   		   This event repeats every week.
	   	   		   The next reminder for this event will be sent in 1 hour, 34 minutes.
	   		   
	 
	   		   Event Location: Online
	   	   	   	   		   
	  	   		   Notes:
		   http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogger_VideoconferencesCheck above link for GMT time and vidconference link.
	   		  


				  

	ADVERTISEMENT



	  

  

  

  
  



Copyright 
2005 
Yahoo! Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service


  








  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










Re: [videoblogging] Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Adam Quirk



On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:









I don't understand the need to strictly define 
videoblogging except to separate individually (or collectively) produced 
independentvideo from advertising trailers promoting a commercial 
product (movie trailers, etc.) The independence of unfettered personal 
_expression_ is key to defining vlogging in my mind.
And that is where it should stay, in your mind.
There are videoblogs that do not rely on personal _expression_.
MediaMatters. Crooks and Liars. ScienCentral.
There are many genres of videoblogs. 

By the way, Sciencentral is great. I'm not sure if it's been mentioned before here.
http://www.sciencentral.com/
http://www.sciencentral.com/feed.rss (no enclosures, just excerpts)

AQ
google.comRandolfe (Randy) Wicker
http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
  Enric 
  To: 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:57 
  AM
  Subject: [videoblogging] Define 
  Videoblogging
  There's been a idea that has been promoted to not 
  defineVideoblogging. That it is too soon, that defining it will lock 
  itdown and constrain it, and so on. The error is that a 
  model,definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable. 
  Youdon't discover something by not applying a model to it, but by 
  testingif a proposed model accurately describes the item in 
  question.The video projects that are interesting and successful 
  whether thehighly structured Rocket Boom or loosely structured Carp 
  Caviar, havea understandable structure. Experimental films have 
  existed sinceEdison and others invented the technology of 
  filmmaking. But itbecame a vibrant media once Griffith found and 
  clearly displayed the60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a 
  Nation. Within thatclear models of genres and forms -- the science 
  fiction, crime (withsubgenre of noire), romance (subgenres of 
  romantic-comedy, etc.),comedy, etc. sub-models --- resolved into modes of 
  film _expression_. It is a mistake to narrowly define an art 
  form. To say thatvideoblogging is just personal diaries or citizen 
  journalism oranother type of genre _expression_. This is like saying 
  film isadventure. It may be that adventure (or romantic or crime) 
  films arethe most prevalent genres, but they are not the only genres that 
  canexist and are interesting. It is the form of a duration around 
  90minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form. And 
  itis a video with blogging capability that may be the correct model 
  thatdifferent genres of videoblogging exist in. That model may 
  beincomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested 
  againstcompeting models until the correct model is determined. 
  Saying thatno model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for 
  flounderingand stagnation. -- Enric

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




  














  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] block by block video

2005-12-17 Thread Randolfe Wicker





It will be interesting to see different 
perspectives on living somewhere. I'm hardly a fan of the Wall Street 
greasers you describe. However, when some of them died on 9/11, the town 
built a monument to them.

I see we do patronize the same green grocer at 3rd 
 Washington Street. Ever compare grocery prices in Manhattan with 
those at the Hoboken Shoprite? You'll save enough to pay your Cable, 
Internet  phone bill right there.

Young people partying in Hoboken translate into no 
parking places, people pissing in the parks, screams and slamming car doors all 
hours of the night. I see them lined up to get into the club opposite the 
Post Office (the one with steroid-inflated bouncers) and shudder to think 
they're capable of reproducing.

My interactions with locals (since 1976) has always 
surprised me. Some of them might as well have been living in Ohio. I 
remember several telling me that they hadn't been to Manhattan (7 minutes  
30 cents to $1.50 away) in twenty years.

Randolfe (Randy) WickerHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Adam 
  Quirk 
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 12:30 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] block by 
  block video
  On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
  I'll certainly set out and do a short piece on Hoboken, 
NJ--which is a bedroom community for Manhattan and has become the Ft. 
Lauderdale of New Jersey where all the young people gather to 
  party.
  You make it sound much more exciting than it is :)The Hoboken I 
  know isn't really a place to party. It's where I work, go to Biaggio's 
  Deli for pastrami sandwiches at lunch, buy cheap fruit and veggies at the 
  greengrocer on 3rd and Washington, and generally get along with the older 
  Italian and Jewish inhabitants better than I get along with the Ugg-wearing 
  fashionistas or the strutting Wall Street greasers that pour out of the PATH 
  station between 6 and 7 every evening.I do agree that young people 
  gather to party here though.And this idea is a good one. I just 
  signed up for wayfaring.com. I'll try 
  to get something together. AQbullemhead.com




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Beth Agnew






I always appreciate hearing Jan's voice of sanity. I'm the laughing woman, who would be laughing more had anything of substance I told the reporter showed up in the piece. Don't get me wrong -- any publicity is good publicity. The traffic spike has been just enough to tick off my host and mess with my head. For 15 seconds, I was almost famous!

A good half hour talking to the reporter about participatory media and how vlogging is changing the business landscape results in the routine "look at this new thing called vlogging" story. How foolish of me to think the WSJ would actually put a business spin on the topic. I was idealistic enough to think that the story might prompt companies to seek out vloggers to advise them on how to leverage this new medium for bottom-line value such as creating relationships with customers, and demonstrating their products.

I realize that it may be all her editor wanted/would accept. Fingers crossed that at some point, when there's a dearth of real stories, she'll revisit that material with a deeper view.

The early days of evolution and revolution are going to be filled with the churn that's been mentioned. It's a good thing that some of you get ticked enough to say "what about me?". That way we'll all get represented somehow. I was only in that story because of a kind mention by someone else. The story needed an opening act, and they chose a clown. Not necessarily bad, that's my mission after all, but don't take it as a rejection of the serious vlogging many of you do. I am continually in awe of the talent, insight, skill, and vision of my fellow vloggers. 

I'd be more active in this group if not for the overwhelming pressure of my current (paid!) work. I'm keeping an eye on y'all though! Vlog on, people. I love ya!

Laugh every day. Laugh for no reason. Laugh your stress away.
--Beth
- -
Beth Agnew, Professor of Mirth
laughpractice.blogspot.com
http://tinyurl.com/83u5u


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I don't understand the need to strictly define videoblogging
except to
  separate individually (or collectively) produced independent
video from
  advertising trailers promoting a commercial product (movie
trailers, etc.)
  The independence of unfettered personal expression is key to defining
  vlogging in my mind.
 
 
 And that is where it should stay, in your mind.

Untested in peer review, not competing against other models, evolving
slowly if at all.  Disapearing should Randolfe not reach immortality.

  -- Enric

 There are videoblogs that do not rely on personal expression.
 MediaMatters.  Crooks and Liars.  ScienCentral.
 There are many genres of videoblogs.
 
 By the way, Sciencentral is great.  I'm not sure if it's been mentioned
 before here.
 http://www.sciencentral.com/
 http://www.sciencentral.com/feed.rss (no enclosures, just excerpts)
 
 AQ
 google.com
 
  Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
  http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  *From:* Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *To:* videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  *Sent:* Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:57 AM
  *Subject:* [videoblogging] Define Videoblogging
 
  There's been a idea that has been promoted to not define
  Videoblogging.  That it is too soon, that defining it will lock it
  down and constrain it, and so on.  The error is that a model,
  definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable.  You
  don't discover something by not applying a model to it, but by testing
  if a proposed model accurately describes the item in question.
 
  The video projects that are interesting and successful whether the
  highly structured Rocket Boom or loosely structured Carp Caviar, have
  a understandable structure.  Experimental films have existed since
  Edison and others invented the technology of filmmaking.  But it
  became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the
  60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation.  Within that
  clear models of genres and forms -- the science fiction, crime (with
  subgenre of noire), romance (subgenres of romantic-comedy, etc.),
  comedy, etc. sub-models --- resolved into modes of film expression.
 
  It is a mistake to narrowly define an art form.  To say that
  videoblogging is just personal diaries or citizen journalism or
  another type of genre expression.  This is like saying film is
  adventure.  It may be that adventure (or romantic or crime) films are
  the most prevalent genres, but they are not the only genres that can
  exist and are interesting.  It is the form of a duration around 90
  minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.  And it
  is a video with blogging capability that may be the correct model that
  different genres of videoblogging exist in.  That model may be
  incomplete or innacurate, but it should be proposed and tested against
  competing models until the correct model is determined.  Saying that
  no model should be tested is quite possibly a recipe for floundering
  and stagnation.
 
-- Enric
 
 
 
 
 
   --
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
 
 
 -  Visit your group
videoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging
 on the web.
 
 -  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 -  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
 Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.
 
 
   --
 
 








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread chris_koehn
...independent journalism?

...connecting people?

...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?

...criticized for being too banal?

...an endless debate on what it really was?


Now it's just myspace.com with video. And it's worse than blogging, with all 
the self 
promotion. People seem to act like the more they throw their link around, the 
better 
chance they have of being famous. It wasn't about that. Or maybe I was just 
being naive to 
think that something interesting/important like this would not be marketed from 
within by 
a bunch of sellouts.

I see a few projects with a purpose coming together, and perhaps the 
communications 
part is still a major use of videoblogging. Maybe there's hope. I was never 
part of an old 
boy's network, but I was videoblogging when there were a handful of people on 
this list. I 
have seen this whole thing get transformed into something I don't like. I even 
once left 
this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing folks who spammed up the 
place with 
pseudo-philosophical ramblings about the nature of videoblogging rather than 
simply 
making content. It was kinda funny how some people who never really made 
anything had 
the energy and insight to define it...

Well what do I know, my RSS feed shows only a handful of the glorious number of 
subscribers I once had (when I cared and tried), who wants to listen to me? I 
guess I will 
just scour fireant for the occasional gem, and stay subscribed to some of the 
stalwarts 
who crank out decent stuff.

Bottom line: you videoblog, don't quit your day job.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread chris_koehn
Ha, I had mistakenly thought this conversation was dead.


Here's something to think about for those that demand definition. Perhaps 
defintions are for 
those who can't simply enjoy something, or just plain don't get it? Definitions 
are a crutch. 
Go do something.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Ha, I had mistakenly thought this conversation was dead.
 
 
 Here's something to think about for those that demand definition.
Perhaps defintions are for 
 those who can't simply enjoy something, or just plain don't get it?
Definitions are a crutch. 
 Go do something.


Or perhaps they are not.  There's no contradiction between having a
model and putting it in action (doing).

  -- Enric






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Bi-Weekly Vlog Videoconference, 12/17/2005, 3:00 pm

2005-12-17 Thread videoblogging













My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page










	

   
 
  
 
   

   

 Reminder from 
  the Calendar of videoblogging
  

  

 
   

   
 
  

  
	   		   Bi-Weekly Vlog Videoconference
	   		   
   
		   Saturday December 17, 2005
   3:00 pm
	   		   - 5:00 pm
	   		   
	   		   This event repeats every week.
	   	   		   
	 
	   		   Event Location: Online
	   	   	   	   		   
	  	   		   Notes:
		   http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogger_VideoconferencesCheck above link for GMT time and vidconference link.
	   		  


				  

	ADVERTISEMENT



	  

  

  

  
  



Copyright 
2005 
Yahoo! Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service


  








  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










[videoblogging] Re: Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread missbhavens1969
Do you really think videoblogging ISN'T those things, anymore? Has it really 
changed that 
much in such a brief period of time? The first three points on your list are 
exactly why I 
watch videoblogs, and the last one is why I avoid this yahoo group. 

Every day in my little aggregator I find gems in independent journalism, people 
connecting 
and MORE than the occasional artistic tidbit. Bigger than tidbits. Whole 
pieces, really. 
Mondo chunks. Mega slabs. You get the idea.

Bekah

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ...independent journalism?
 
 ...connecting people?
 
 ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?
 
 ...criticized for being too banal?
 
 ...an endless debate on what it really was?
 
 
 Now it's just myspace.com with video. 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread Michael I
It has changed quite a bit. it hasn't gone way of
mySpace otherwise we'd all be rich.
I think it is harder now to find what you want...you
have to filter. This is what happens when things be
come pop then culture.

--- missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Do you really think videoblogging ISN'T those
 things, anymore? Has it really changed that 
 much in such a brief period of time? The first three
 points on your list are exactly why I 
 watch videoblogs, and the last one is why I avoid
 this yahoo group. 
 
 Every day in my little aggregator I find gems in
 independent journalism, people connecting 
 and MORE than the occasional artistic tidbit. Bigger
 than tidbits. Whole pieces, really. 
 Mondo chunks. Mega slabs. You get the idea.
 
 Bekah
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  ...independent journalism?
  
  ...connecting people?
  
  ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?
  
  ...criticized for being too banal?
  
  ...an endless debate on what it really was?
  
  
  Now it's just myspace.com with video. 
 
 
 
 


MIck I
http://www.idvfilms.blogspot.com
http://www.idvfilms.com
Aloha

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Loiez D.
In my opinion vlogging is not a modele ( there is x modele of vlogging)
may be a spirit
 the feeling of the media's mastering

Loiez

Le 17 déc. 05 à 20:03, Enric a écrit :


 Or perhaps they are not.  There's no contradiction between having a
 model and putting it in action (doing).

   -- Enric




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Ron Watson
In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free  
speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that  
is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to  
allow anyone to be heard.

Vlogging and blogging are our bullhorns, our pamphlets, our theaters,  
and our town halls. If we hang on to them, they will give us all the  
right to be heard.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Joshua Kinberg
I would amend this to the opportunity to be heard or maybe the
right to the opportunity...

Remember, there is nothing obligating anyone to view your content just
because you publish it. Viewers will always have the right to tune you
out.

-josh


On 12/17/05, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free
 speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that
 is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to
 allow anyone to be heard.

 Vlogging and blogging are our bullhorns, our pamphlets, our theaters,
 and our town halls. If we hang on to them, they will give us all the
 right to be heard.






 Yahoo! Groups Links










 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Loiez D.

Le 17 déc. 05 à 21:03, Ron Watson a écrit :

 In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free
 speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that
 is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to
 allow anyone to be heard.

 Vlogging and blogging are our bullhorns, our pamphlets, our theaters,
 and our town halls. If we hang on to them, they will give us all the
 right to be heard.

My proposition

Vlogging International Manifesto

Since we refuse (say no to) the obviousnesses of formatted cultures,  
the domination of cultural patterns and the distorted connivence game  
between all the authorities,
since we yearn for more solidarity in the representation of the world  
and its mutations, we —  voluntary citizens —, pioneers of the new  
territories, artists, poets of our days and historians of our  
emotions, accountable for our viewpoints and thoughts, we claim our  
collective and shared place as major actors of the reflection of our  
societies. We commit ourselves to watering the fields of knowledge  
and history with a poetry grown in our daily life.
Through solidarity, skills transfer, the capitalization of  
technologies, the pooling of our resources and a deep longing to  
attest for the lives we live, the groups we belong to, our tribes,  
our differences and everything which gathers us in a free and deeply  
human movement.
Peacefully armed with our only video cameras and ourstill fresh will  
to be where there is never anybody, neither major TV company nor  
producers of stolen images for the benefit of profitable aims or the  
shade, we will only be present in the movement of our lives to  
reinvent art and the material for the media of the new worlds. All  
united, all media, to multiply our glances and our thoughts, the  
exchanges and confrontations of ideas in the respect of the others,  
of their culture and their perception of a one and only one earth.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Christopher Weagel
This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of  
the impure.

I urge you to begin them immediately.

Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com



On Dec 17, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Loiez D. wrote:


 Le 17 déc. 05 à 21:03, Ron Watson a écrit :

 In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free
 speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that
 is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to
 allow anyone to be heard.

 Vlogging and blogging are our bullhorns, our pamphlets, our theaters,
 and our town halls. If we hang on to them, they will give us all the
 right to be heard.

 My proposition

 Vlogging International Manifesto

 Since we refuse (say no to) the obviousnesses of formatted cultures,
 the domination of cultural patterns and the distorted connivence game
 between all the authorities,
 since we yearn for more solidarity in the representation of the world
 and its mutations, we —  voluntary citizens —, pioneers of the new
 territories, artists, poets of our days and historians of our
 emotions, accountable for our viewpoints and thoughts, we claim our
 collective and shared place as major actors of the reflection of our
 societies. We commit ourselves to watering the fields of knowledge
 and history with a poetry grown in our daily life.
 Through solidarity, skills transfer, the capitalization of
 technologies, the pooling of our resources and a deep longing to
 attest for the lives we live, the groups we belong to, our tribes,
 our differences and everything which gathers us in a free and deeply
 human movement.
 Peacefully armed with our only video cameras and ourstill fresh will
 to be where there is never anybody, neither major TV company nor
 producers of stolen images for the benefit of profitable aims or the
 shade, we will only be present in the movement of our lives to
 reinvent art and the material for the media of the new worlds. All
 united, all media, to multiply our glances and our thoughts, the
 exchanges and confrontations of ideas in the respect of the others,
 of their culture and their perception of a one and only one earth.


  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Chuck Olsen
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In my opinion vlogging is not a modele ( there is x modele of vlogging)
 may be a spirit  the feeling of the media's mastering

i like the sounds of that!

i'm not one for dogma or definitions. but i've always been a sucker for 
manifestos.

yes, let the purges begin. the pure of vlog need not worry!

the judge: ManCheeseMo.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6305130949/104-5203272-5767925?v=glancen=130:
 
 
 Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
 They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
 of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
 
 
  -- Enric

Amazon.com is NOT an authority. Check the IMDb if you have to check
anything. It's 187 minutes.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Using feedburner's new feature feedflare to fix itunes

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Meiser


Howdy Rick, My compliments on the new features Feedflare. http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/001543.htmlThis is an open letter to ask if you and the guys at feedburner would be willing to fix itunes.What specifically I mean is itunes supports plain-text ONLY, no formating, no links in their silly comments box. They do in fact NOT have any links anywhere back to the permalink page on which the podcast or video was posted.I find this a slap in the face of podcasters and vloggers everywhere as podcasting and video blogging have the opportunity to be much more than simply a broadcast medium. In fact many would say being able to comment is an essential feature of videoblogging and podcasting. Which is why EVERY OTHER RSS READER HAS CLICKABLE PERMALINKS. Sorry, I just wanted to be clear about that.Anyway, my friends try to console me in my constant bitching that it's not that apple is evil, but just that they didn't have a good mechanism for displaying rich text, that they're sort of clueless.   And so I've waited. However it's been to long, I would have thought they'd fix it by now in one of the many version updates that have come out. In fact apple has now put in links back to the homepage of the blog for every post, right near the podcast title, but STILL no link directly to the permalink page... I'm beginning to find it impossible that they're that clueless and am beginning to wonder if it's not part of some diabolical plan to either undermine the success of podcasting, or just to see if they can't piss absolutely everyone in this community off. Well, I'm pissed off, but I don't get made I find solutions... and maybe get even. ;)So how can you help?  Simple... you should, might, could, add in plain-text permalinks into a feed at the end of the description field.. it would then be readable and copyable right from itunes info box. Easy for you to implement in a feed and much better than thousands of users having to go to a blog and browse around and look for the right post so they can read or comment upon it. Example below.Comment! http://permalink.com/blog/post.htmlWell, you get the idea, i just wish apple did.  Of course you could add your other features of your FeedFlair like emailing and delicious too. Just as long as your urls aren't to long. And of course you have control of that too.How to do this... 1) Well the easiest way would just be to put a switch into the feed and just allow people to turn it on.. call it the "fix itunes" switch.  I'm sure it'll not only get peoples attention, but get blogged about a bit too. ;)2) Option two, detect feed calls from itunes... would work great, but requires some spryness on your part... then just put in the permalink at the very end of the post no matter what. Won't get you much publicity though, just help out the community.I suggest option one, you might put have an optional checkbox put in where people can add the additional feature as follows.Tell apple to fix these permalinks in iTunes!http://feedburner.com/form/to/email/apple/supportBe as nice or evil about it as you like, but if nothing else all the attention and publicity you'll get out of it will help you, help your customers and give apple a wake up call so maybe they'll fix it a little sooner.Thanks!-MikeMichael Meiser[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://mmeiser.com/blog - fun stuffhttp://mmeiser.com/backchannel - del.icio.us link bloghttp://evilvlog.com - serious lunacy has a new domainhttp://mefeedia.com - I love mefeedia 

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread Christopher Weagel
God, you're right.

Call in the UN. A great tragedy has befallen this once great giant.

I sob for those days when it was just Jay and I in a tent together  
working on our novels.

Jesus. This has caused me to really look into my life and really  
question things.

As a result I'm going to go off into the forest for a few months and  
get re-acquainted with the video-blogging I knew.

Thanks for this awakening.

You have any workbooks or seminars that I could buy/attend?

Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com





On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:53 PM, chris_koehn wrote:

 ...independent journalism?

 ...connecting people?

 ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?

 ...criticized for being too banal?

 ...an endless debate on what it really was?


 Now it's just myspace.com with video. And it's worse than blogging,  
 with all the self
 promotion. People seem to act like the more they throw their link  
 around, the better
 chance they have of being famous. It wasn't about that. Or maybe I  
 was just being naive to
 think that something interesting/important like this would not be  
 marketed from within by
 a bunch of sellouts.

 I see a few projects with a purpose coming together, and perhaps  
 the communications
 part is still a major use of videoblogging. Maybe there's hope. I  
 was never part of an old
 boy's network, but I was videoblogging when there were a handful of  
 people on this list. I
 have seen this whole thing get transformed into something I don't  
 like. I even once left
 this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing folks who  
 spammed up the place with
 pseudo-philosophical ramblings about the nature of videoblogging  
 rather than simply
 making content. It was kinda funny how some people who never really  
 made anything had
 the energy and insight to define it...

 Well what do I know, my RSS feed shows only a handful of the  
 glorious number of
 subscribers I once had (when I cared and tried), who wants to  
 listen to me? I guess I will
 just scour fireant for the occasional gem, and stay subscribed to  
 some of the stalwarts
 who crank out decent stuff.

 Bottom line: you videoblog, don't quit your day job.





  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined.
  But a start.  I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of
 videoblogging.  Just that it is more useful to have a workable
 definition than none.
 
   -- Enric

Oh, come off it. The moment you add anything to that description
you're essentially disregarding whole groups of very cinematic films.
Do you know anything about scientific names? Well, cinema is a phylum,
not a species.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread Clint Sharp
chris_koehn wrote:

 ...independent journalism?

 ...connecting people?

 ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?

 ...criticized for being too banal?

 ...an endless debate on what it really was?

Ah, the good ole' days.  Strange the compressed time schedule these 
days.  It used to be something had to be around for more than a couple 
of years before we started talking about good ole' days.  Oh well.

Clint

-- 
Clint Sharp
New Media Guy  Technologist
ClintSharp.com  Contact Info: http://clintsharp.com/contact/

We are the media.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
 ...an endless debate on what it really was?

Sure, but right now I'm feeling like I have to argue on behalf of
cinema in general. Crazy stuff...

 I even once left 
 this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing folks who
spammed up the place with 
 pseudo-philosophical ramblings about the nature of videoblogging
rather than simply 
 making content. It was kinda funny how some people who never really
made anything had 
 the energy and insight to define it...

I agree with a lot of what you have to say about people videoblogging
for self-serving purporses (but, then, a lot of people do a lot of
things for self-serving purposes; it's the nature of people), but I
think this here is a little wrongheaded. Non-practicing critics,
academics, and so on, are to some extent--a great extent, I would
argue--required. You might not think so, but videoblogs are ripe for
academic study (I'm going to be writing a thesis on them soon, and am
currently preparing a paper on 'Chasing Windmills'; I'm also a
practicing videoblogger, however, so perhaps that doesn't count).
Sometimes the people in the midst of a movement lack the skills or, in
your case, desire to theorise it in the context of art history,
socio-political history, psychoanalysis, feminism, all these various
fields of thought. You might think it wank, but so be it. Remember,
Chris, the videoblogger isn't an island. While we might develop and
further the form from within, we ourselves are influenced from
without. Academic discourse, criticism, and so on, can help us to see
where we've come from and where we might go. Pseudo-philosophical
ramblings are worth something.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Christopher Weagel
You tell em Josh!

Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com


On Dec 17, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:

 I would amend this to the opportunity to be heard or maybe the
 right to the opportunity...

 Remember, there is nothing obligating anyone to view your content just
 because you publish it. Viewers will always have the right to tune you
 out.

 -josh


 On 12/17/05, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free
 speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that
 is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to
 allow anyone to be heard.

 Vlogging and blogging are our bullhorns, our pamphlets, our theaters,
 and our town halls. If we hang on to them, they will give us all the
 right to be heard.






 Yahoo! Groups Links










  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop  
 slavery.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I would amend this to the opportunity to be heard or maybe the
 right to the opportunity...

And that's what counts.

The read-write web has turned negative liberties into positive liberties.

At least for some. I don't think we should ever stop reminding
ourselves that while, yes, while we now have a very real opportunity
to be heard, there still exists a very real digital divide, in
developed countries as much as anywhere else. It's one thing for us to
shoot those people's stories and upload them, but it's another to
erode that divide and let them do it themselves. That should be the
goal, in which case our focus needs to be not only on videoblogging,
but in the real world, offline, as well, where the right to the
opportunity to be heard still isn't actually a right, but a privelage.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of  
 the impure.
 
 I urge you to begin them immediately.
 
 Chris Weagel
 www.human-dog.com

Videobloggers of the world, unite!






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Chuck Olsen

We were the media

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of  
  the impure.
  
  I urge you to begin them immediately.
  
  Chris Weagel
  www.human-dog.com
 
 Videobloggers of the world, unite!








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 We were the media

Actually, I've always had a problem with the term we are the media.
I mean, do we really want to be the media? The media are evil.

I personally think the 'the' should have been removed.

We are media. (Hear us roar.)





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Using feedburner's new feature feedflare to fix itunes

2005-12-17 Thread Rick Klau
My reply to Michael (sent privately earlier, hadn't realized he'd
posted in the group as well):

Michael -
 
I actually met for a few hours with the iTunes podcasting team this
week in San Francisco, and better rendering of show notes, links to
items, comments, etc. was high on my list of requests. As soon as I
have an ETA, I'll be sure to let you know.

For what it's worth, I think Apple's turning a corner with respect to
the communication on this (podcast support, that is). They recognize
that their engagement with the community has been lacking, and are
working hard to fix it. One early indicator of this is that Apple is
now supporting ping notifications of podcast updates - something that
they had never done before (despite requests from us and no doubt many
others). They're now a default ping recipient for all FeedBurner ping
updates.
 
There's more coming, which we'll work hard to communicate proactively
as we're able. I also anticipate that Apple will do a much better job
of communicating its priorities and developments.
 
Keep in touch, and let me know how I can help.
 
Regards,
 
Rick


Rick Klau
VP, Business Development
FeedBurner - http://www.feedburner.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM/Y!/Skype: RickKlau
office: 312.756.0022 x2012
direct: 312.239-0727
cell: 630.362.8911
 
Breathe more life into your content with FeedBurner's latest offering,
FeedFlare. Let subscribers email, tag and share your content in the
wild. http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/001543.html 



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Howdy Rick, My compliments on the new features Feedflare.
 
 http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/001543.html
 
 This is an open letter to ask if you and the guys at feedburner would  
 be willing to fix itunes.
 
 What specifically I mean is itunes supports plain-text ONLY, no  
 formating, no links in their silly comments box. They do in fact NOT  
 have any links anywhere back to the permalink page on which the  
 podcast or video was posted.
 
 I find this a slap in the face of podcasters and vloggers everywhere  
 as podcasting and video blogging have the opportunity to be much more  
 than simply a broadcast medium. In fact many would say being able to  
 comment is an essential feature of videoblogging and podcasting.  
 Which is why EVERY OTHER RSS READER HAS CLICKABLE PERMALINKS. Sorry,  
 I just wanted to be clear about that.
 
 Anyway, my friends try to console me in my constant bitching that  
 it's not that apple is evil, but just that they didn't have a good  
 mechanism for displaying rich text, that they're sort of clueless.
 And so I've waited. However it's been to long, I would have thought  
 they'd fix it by now in one of the many version updates that have  
 come out. In fact apple has now put in links back to the homepage of  
 the blog for every post, right near the podcast title, but STILL no  
 link directly to the permalink page... I'm beginning to find it  
 impossible that they're that clueless and am beginning to wonder if  
 it's not part of some diabolical plan to either undermine the success  
 of podcasting, or just to see if they can't piss absolutely everyone  
 in this community off. Well, I'm pissed off, but I don't get made I  
 find solutions... and maybe get even. ;)
 
 So how can you help?
 
 Simple... you should, might, could, add in plain-text permalinks into  
 a feed at the end of the description field.. it would then be  
 readable and copyable right from itunes info box. Easy for you to  
 implement in a feed and much better than thousands of users having to  
 go to a blog and browse around and look for the right post so they  
 can read or comment upon it. Example below.
 
  Comment!
  http://permalink.com/blog/post.html
 
 Well, you get the idea, i just wish apple did.  Of course you could  
 add your other features of your FeedFlair like emailing and delicious  
 too. Just as long as your urls aren't to long. And of course you have  
 control of that too.
 
 
 How to do this...
 
 1) Well the easiest way would just be to put a switch into the feed  
 and just allow people to turn it on.. call it the fix itunes  
 switch.  I'm sure it'll not only get peoples attention, but get  
 blogged about a bit too. ;)
 
 2) Option two, detect feed calls from itunes... would work great, but  
 requires some spryness on your part... then just put in the permalink  
 at the very end of the post no matter what. Won't get you much  
 publicity though, just help out the community.
 
 I suggest option one, you might put have an optional checkbox put in  
 where people can add the additional feature as follows.
 
 Tell apple to fix these permalinks in iTunes!
 http://feedburner.com/form/to/email/apple/support
 
 Be as nice or evil about it as you like, but if nothing else all the  
 attention and publicity you'll get out of it will help you, help your  
 customers and give apple a wake up call so maybe 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Loiez D.


we will be "the" media ?Le 17 déc. 05 à 22:47, Chuck Olsen a écrit :   We were the media  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew Clayfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of the impure.  I urge you to begin them immediately.  Chris Weagel   www.human-dog.comVideobloggers of the world, unite! YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 we will be the media?

A media, among many. There will be no 'the.'

Now, *this* is absurd...

:D





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Loiez D.


Désolé, j'ai peut-être fait un contresens et il serait plus facile pour moi de m'exprimer en français ;-(LoiezWhy you don't speak french ? and spanish, turkish, german..Le 17 déc. 05 à 23:07, Matthew Clayfield a écrit :  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Loiez D." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   we will be "the" media?  A media, among many. There will be no 'the.'  Now, *this* is absurd...  :D  SPONSORED LINKS  Individual  Fireant  Typepad  Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why you don't speak french ? and spanish, turkish, german..

Because I can't!

Puisque je ne peux pas!

Weil ich nicht kann!

¡Porque no puedo!

And so on and so forth.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Loiez D.
Sorry for this thread i was angry ;-n
because it's difficult to be a citizen of the world
But I think vlogging could be a way for that

Peace, love, and vlogging for all !!!

Loiez


Le 17 déc. 05 à 23:29, Matthew Clayfield a écrit :

 And so on and so forth.




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined.
   But a start.  I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of
  videoblogging.  Just that it is more useful to have a workable
  definition than none.
  
-- Enric
 
 Oh, come off it. The moment you add anything to that description
 you're essentially disregarding whole groups of very cinematic films.
 Do you know anything about scientific names? Well, cinema is a phylum,
 not a species.


RSS, OPML, HTTP are imperfect standards.  But they're quite useful.  A
model not need to be general to the point that it must fit every
possibility present and to the future.  Some models are more useful
when defining the general qualities of a subject and leaving out the
outliers.  It's not a crime to have models (or to skateboard.)

  -- Enric






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Olsen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  We were the media
 
 Actually, I've always had a problem with the term we are the media.
 I mean, do we really want to be the media? The media are evil.
 
 I personally think the 'the' should have been removed.
 
 We are media. (Hear us roar.)


For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through
tools.  Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to
be media.

  -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] PAL vs NTSC Cameras for vlogging...does it really matter?

2005-12-17 Thread Vincent Njoroge Ndonye



Hi, I am considering buying a camera and am curious if it really matters which format I use if my video is going to end up online. I will be filming in Kenya, which is in the PAL half of the world and my friends tell me I should get a PAL camera. Does it really matter?
regards,vincent





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's not a crime to have models...

And I'm not saying it is. And I'm still not talking about videoblogging.

You didn't say that a certain form was or could be a model for a
certain type of cinema, Enric, you said that a certain form defined
cinema. Whether you like it or not, this is wrong.

If nothing else, you're confusing models and definitions.

A definition is a statement conveying the fundamental character of a
thing. The fundamental character of the cinema is images existing in
time, not ninety minute narratives with three acts. That's the
fundamental character of but one of many possible models for many
possible types of cinema, not cinema itself, which is what you said.

A model is work, construction, or in this case, schema, that serves as
a plan from which a final product is to be made. It has nothing to do
with fundamental characteristics of a thing, but with the imposition
of paradigmatic reductions and limitations on those characteristics,
with specifics.

I agree that models--both in practice and in theory--can be valuable
to videoblogging as to any art, as long as they remain models and
don't, as Markus wisely warns, ossify into dogmas. But models are not
definitions, Enric. And your definition of cinema was wrong.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Michael I



Define mediaEnric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew Clayfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Olsen"  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:We were the mediaActually, I've always had a problem with the term "we are the media."  I mean, do we really want to be the media? The media are evil.I personally think the 'the' should have been removed.We are media. (Hear us roar.)   For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through tools. Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to be media.   -- Enric   
MIck Ihttp://www.idvfilms.blogspot.comhttp://www.idvfilms.comAloha__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through
 tools.  Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to
 be media.

Sigh.

Enric, that remains true with or without the 'the'.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation:
 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6305130949/104-5203272-5767925?v=glancen=130:
  
  
  Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
  They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
  of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
  
  
   -- Enric
 
 Amazon.com is NOT an authority. Check the IMDb if you have to check
 anything. It's 187 minutes.



From IMDB.COM, http://imdb.com/title/tt0004972/:

190 min (16 fps) / USA:125 min (video version) / USA:187 min (DVD) 


My 1992 video version is 187 minutes.

Birth of a Nation has had different running times depending on what
the various distibutors over time thought worked best.  

  -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.

Wow, what a great idea. I'd love to be able to order a film at the 
length I prefer. Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes. It might even 
be interesting enough to actually watch.

Regards,
  Richard
-- 
Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: what is vlogging...

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:09 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through
 tools.  Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to
 be media.

Since I managed to bring up McLuhan in the video conference today: We  
don't consume media. Media are extension of ourselves (that's why that one  
book is titled understanding media - the extensions of man).

I'll go to bed now. I'm not even that much of a McLuhan fan (sorry,  
Schlomo!)

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It's not a crime to have models...
 
 And I'm not saying it is. And I'm still not talking about videoblogging.
 
 You didn't say that a certain form was or could be a model for a
 certain type of cinema, Enric, you said that a certain form defined
 cinema. Whether you like it or not, this is wrong.
 
 If nothing else, you're confusing models and definitions.
 
 A definition is a statement conveying the fundamental character of a
 thing. The fundamental character of the cinema is images existing in
 time, not ninety minute narratives with three acts. That's the
 fundamental character of but one of many possible models for many
 possible types of cinema, not cinema itself, which is what you said.
 
 A model is work, construction, or in this case, schema, that serves as
 a plan from which a final product is to be made. It has nothing to do
 with fundamental characteristics of a thing, but with the imposition
 of paradigmatic reductions and limitations on those characteristics,
 with specifics.
 
 I agree that models--both in practice and in theory--can be valuable
 to videoblogging as to any art, as long as they remain models and
 don't, as Markus wisely warns, ossify into dogmas. But models are not
 definitions, Enric. And your definition of cinema was wrong.


This is correct.  I should have used the word model and it's
synonyms.  (Though finding the definition providing the fundatmental
characteristic of videoblogging will also be useful.)

  -- Enric






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:21:47 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
 They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
 of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.

 Wow, what a great idea. I'd love to be able to order a film at the
 length I prefer. Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes. It might even
 be interesting enough to actually watch.

For my very first videoblog entry I used book-a-minute to create a 30  
second version of Shakespeare's Julius Ceasar:

URL: http://www.solitude.dk/archives/20040626-1828/ 

I see there's a movie-a-minute website now. Maybe it's time to get  
cranking. :o)

URL: http://rinkworks.com/movieaminute/ 

Maybe The Professional can be the first project?

URL: http://rinkworks.com/movieaminute/m/professional.shtml 

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes.

There's a vlog entry in that.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Birth of a Nation has had different running times depending on what
  the various distibutors over time thought worked best.  
 
 Oh, so cinema became, as you say, a vibrant media once the
 *distributors* found and clearly displayed the 60-120 minute, three
 act model in 'Birth of a Nation', *not* Griffith, the artist, who you
 originally cited, and whose cut was 187 minutes long.
 
 Okay, cool. I see where you're coming from now. I was obviously
 unaware that the distributors were the ones who were determining what
 forms define cinema. And here I was thinking that artists develop art
 forms!


Just a statement of fact, not value.

  -- Enric






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [videoblogging] PAL vs NTSC Cameras for vlogging...does it really matter?

2005-12-17 Thread Jake Ludington














Hi, I am considering buying a camera and am curious if it really
matters which format I use if my video is going to end up online. I will be
filming in Kenya, which is in the PAL half of the world and my
friends tell me I should get a PAL camera. Does it really matter? 
regards,
vincent









  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Though finding the definition providing the fundatmental
 characteristic of videoblogging will also be useful.

The fundamental characteristic of videoblogging is time-based images
exisiting in a more or less permeable network context. The more
permeable the better. It's a shame more people don't listen to Adrian
Miles.

If cinema is a phylum, videoblogging is a genus.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Just a statement of fact, not value.

You were contradicting yourself.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Joshua Kinberg
  Amazon.com is NOT an authority. Check the IMDb if you have to check
  anything.

i think Amazon owns IMDB.

-Josh


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread Susan
Make some more p-money bird vids while you're at it ;)
Susan 
http://vlog.kitykity.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 God, you're right.
 
 Call in the UN. A great tragedy has befallen this once great giant.
 
 I sob for those days when it was just Jay and I in a tent together  
 working on our novels.
 
 Jesus. This has caused me to really look into my life and really  
 question things.
 
 As a result I'm going to go off into the forest for a few months and  
 get re-acquainted with the video-blogging I knew.
 
 Thanks for this awakening.
 
 You have any workbooks or seminars that I could buy/attend?
 
 Chris Weagel
 www.human-dog.com
 
 
 
 
 
 On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:53 PM, chris_koehn wrote:
 
  ...independent journalism?
 
  ...connecting people?
 
  ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?
 
  ...criticized for being too banal?
 
  ...an endless debate on what it really was?
 
 
  Now it's just myspace.com with video. And it's worse than blogging,  
  with all the self
  promotion. People seem to act like the more they throw their link  
  around, the better
  chance they have of being famous. It wasn't about that. Or maybe I  
  was just being naive to
  think that something interesting/important like this would not be  
  marketed from within by
  a bunch of sellouts.
 
  I see a few projects with a purpose coming together, and perhaps  
  the communications
  part is still a major use of videoblogging. Maybe there's hope. I  
  was never part of an old
  boy's network, but I was videoblogging when there were a handful of  
  people on this list. I
  have seen this whole thing get transformed into something I don't  
  like. I even once left
  this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing folks who  
  spammed up the place with
  pseudo-philosophical ramblings about the nature of videoblogging  
  rather than simply
  making content. It was kinda funny how some people who never really  
  made anything had
  the energy and insight to define it...
 
  Well what do I know, my RSS feed shows only a handful of the  
  glorious number of
  subscribers I once had (when I cared and tried), who wants to  
  listen to me? I guess I will
  just scour fireant for the occasional gem, and stay subscribed to  
  some of the stalwarts
  who crank out decent stuff.
 
  Bottom line: you videoblog, don't quit your day job.
 
 
 
 
 
   Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
  ~--
  AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
  http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
   
  ~-
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Just a statement of fact, not value.
 
 You were contradicting yourself.


You're correct on that point.

  -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
 i think Amazon owns IMDB.

Really? Wow. I had no idea.

What u$e could they po$$ibly have with a $ite like that, I wonder?





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Please explain and/or example permeable network context.

The multidirectional communication flow of the internet.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Please explain and/or example permeable network context.
 
 The multidirectional communication flow of the internet.


OK, what about the blog part of videoblogging -- linking, serial content
and immediate comments?

  -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Please explain and/or example permeable network context.
  
  The multidirectional communication flow of the internet.
 
 
 OK, what about the blog part of videoblogging -- linking, serial content
 and immediate comments?
 
   -- Enric


Oops, that's a subset of multidirectional communication flow of the
internet.  Nevermind.

  -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
At 0:03 + 18/12/05, Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Are you guys having fun with this?

I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little...

Maybe you should do a video about it? :-)

Regards
  Richard


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 0:03 + 18/12/05, Enric wrote:
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
 
 
 Are you guys having fun with this?
 
 I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little...
 
 Maybe you should do a video about it? :-)
 
 Regards
   Richard



Meta is useful at times.  I learned something.

 -- Enric





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Are you guys having fun with this?
 
 I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little...

Starting? A little?






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
At 0:12 + 18/12/05, Matthew Clayfield wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Are you guys having fun with this?

  I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little...

Starting? A little?

It's all about the tension over time. We'll come to that later in our 
series. :-)



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread robert a/k/a r
which would make videobloggers all gen(i)uses  ;-/


On Dec 17, 2005, at 6:42 PM, Matthew Clayfield wrote:

 If cinema is a phylum, videoblogging is a genus.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Define....

2005-12-17 Thread jeffrey_harrington
This is just too much...  I liked this group the first week but you
all seem so worried about nothing...

OH Richard nice Rocketboom !!






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 It's all about the tension over time. We'll come to that later in our 
 series. :-)

Actually, I can't think of a worse example of storytelling than
discussion list topics! They suck hard when it comes time to move from
action to conclusion...





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Define....

2005-12-17 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Don't judge us all over a zealous conversation b/n a few people
some conversations are better carried on off-list.

-Josh


On 12/17/05, jeffrey_harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is just too much...  I liked this group the first week but you
 all seem so worried about nothing...

 OH Richard nice Rocketboom !!








 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 which would make videobloggers all gen(i)uses  ;-/

Ha ha.

Seriously, though, we might say that if videoblogging is a genus, then
the various types of videoblogging (personal, citizen journalism,
experimental, fictional, etc.) are species (which can cross-breed,
obviously) and genres within those types (the usual ones, such as
comedy, drama, etc.) are races, though race isn't really an aspect of
scientific classification (and I wouldn't like to think that it could
be). Maybe videoblogging isn't a genus, but a family, in which case
the type of videoblogging is the genus and genres are species.

Regardless, the analogy doesn't need to be perfect, and, needless,
can't be. It's just fun to talk about videoblogging as if it were a
living creature.

Which, of course, it is.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define....

2005-12-17 Thread Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Don't judge us all over a zealous conversation b/n a few people
 some conversations are better carried on off-list.

Or maybe it's better not to talk about such things at all!

Surely it's important for videobloggers to talk about what it is
they're doing, not only in a practical sense, but in a theoretical
sense as well. If we can work out where we are and how we got here, we
can develop ways of moving forward. If we're not going to discuss what
videoblogging is, how are we going to know what it can be? The idea of
just letting things go and letting the chips fall where they may is in
my mind a reactionary position. Practice and theory should coexist.
I'm sure the notion that theory is all that matters is one that
everyone here, almost without exception, would object to. Well, the
notion that practice is all that matters--or that zealous
conversations should be kept off-list--is just as wrongheaded.

Sure, I could always make a video, but it seems to me that
meta-vlogging isn't really all that popular. I'd probably be better
off making the obligatory cooking video.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread bottomunion
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Make some more p-money bird vids while you're at it ;)
 Susan 
 http://vlog.kitykity.com

Susan, I think you have Bottom Union mixed up with Human Dog.  We have nothing 
to do 
with Human Dog and the flith they're spewing over there.  

Erik Nelson
www.bottomunion.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  God, you're right.
  
  Call in the UN. A great tragedy has befallen this once great giant.
  
  I sob for those days when it was just Jay and I in a tent together  
  working on our novels.
  
  Jesus. This has caused me to really look into my life and really  
  question things.
  
  As a result I'm going to go off into the forest for a few months and  
  get re-acquainted with the video-blogging I knew.
  
  Thanks for this awakening.
  
  You have any workbooks or seminars that I could buy/attend?
  
  Chris Weagel
  www.human-dog.com
  
  
  
  
  
  On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:53 PM, chris_koehn wrote:
  
   ...independent journalism?
  
   ...connecting people?
  
   ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?
  
   ...criticized for being too banal?
  
   ...an endless debate on what it really was?
  
  
   Now it's just myspace.com with video. And it's worse than blogging,  
   with all the self
   promotion. People seem to act like the more they throw their link  
   around, the better
   chance they have of being famous. It wasn't about that. Or maybe I  
   was just being naive to
   think that something interesting/important like this would not be  
   marketed from within by
   a bunch of sellouts.
  
   I see a few projects with a purpose coming together, and perhaps  
   the communications
   part is still a major use of videoblogging. Maybe there's hope. I  
   was never part of an old
   boy's network, but I was videoblogging when there were a handful of  
   people on this list. I
   have seen this whole thing get transformed into something I don't  
   like. I even once left
   this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing folks who  
   spammed up the place with
   pseudo-philosophical ramblings about the nature of videoblogging  
   rather than simply
   making content. It was kinda funny how some people who never really  
   made anything had
   the energy and insight to define it...
  
   Well what do I know, my RSS feed shows only a handful of the  
   glorious number of
   subscribers I once had (when I cared and tried), who wants to  
   listen to me? I guess I will
   just scour fireant for the occasional gem, and stay subscribed to  
   some of the stalwarts
   who crank out decent stuff.
  
   Bottom line: you videoblog, don't quit your day job.
  
  
  
  
  
    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
   ~--
   AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
   http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
    
   ~-
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define....

2005-12-17 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Don't judge us all over a zealous conversation b/n a few people
  some conversations are better carried on off-list.
 
 Or maybe it's better not to talk about such things at all!
 
 Surely it's important for videobloggers to talk about what it is
 they're doing, not only in a practical sense, but in a theoretical
 sense as well. If we can work out where we are and how we got here, we
 can develop ways of moving forward. If we're not going to discuss what
 videoblogging is, how are we going to know what it can be? The idea of
 just letting things go and letting the chips fall where they may is in
 my mind a reactionary position. Practice and theory should coexist.
 I'm sure the notion that theory is all that matters is one that
 everyone here, almost without exception, would object to. Well, the
 notion that practice is all that matters--or that zealous
 conversations should be kept off-list--is just as wrongheaded.
 
 Sure, I could always make a video, but it seems to me that
 meta-vlogging isn't really all that popular. I'd probably be better
 off making the obligatory cooking video.


And a journalist who asks question like -- isn't videobloging just
diaries and narcissism -- can be pointed to a workable defintion and
models for types of videoblogs.

  -- Enric






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Bill Streeter
This is a very controversial film. No doubt there are several different cuts 
floating around 
out there. 

Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:

 Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
 They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
 of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
 
 Wow, what a great idea. I'd love to be able to order a film at the 
 length I prefer. Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes. It might even 
 be interesting enough to actually watch.
 
 Regards,
   Richard
 -- 
 Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
 Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Define Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Ted Tagami



Bill - You just nailed it. Well done.On 12/17/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




This is a very controversial film. No doubt there are several different cuts floating around 
out there. 

Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
 They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
 of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
 
 Wow, what a great idea. I'd love to be able to order a film at the 
 length I prefer. Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes. It might even 
 be interesting enough to actually watch.
 
 Regards,
 Richard
 -- 
 Vlog: http://www.kashum.com
 Feed: http://www.kashum.com/rss2.xml











  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


Individual
  
  

Fireant
  
  

Typepad
  
  



Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group videoblogging on the web.

  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




  









-- Ted Tagamitagami.comU N I V E R S U S


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] such a Simpleton! Compression

2005-12-17 Thread Joseph Puentes
I just decided to learn how to vblog. It actually doesn't look to
bad except that I can't get past a very basic step. 

I went to the Free Vlog tutorial at: http://freevlog.org/#compress

I am using a Dell 4550 PC and have Windows Movie Maker. So I opened
WMM and dragged and dropped an video clip (.avi) onto it while I was
watching the tutorial video on compressing with WMM. 

On the tutorial it says to click on Save Movie and then go to
other and to NTSC 768 etc.

Well for the life of me I can't seem to find the Save Movie button
and options to do the other and NTSC 768. [in fact that whole row is
missing I see the menu items -file-edit-view- like in the tutorial and
I see the row of items below that has undo, redo, tasks,  collections
and that window, BUT the row with Save Movie Send Record is
completely missing).

I did a get info about Movie Maker and it says Microsoft Windows
Movie Maker Version 5.1 (Build 2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519: Service
Pack 2) Copyright 1981-2001 Microsoft Corp. Windows Movie Maker
Version 2.1.4026.0

Do I have an old version that needs updating? Or am I just blind
(probably)? 

I can't get past step .5 on the compression of the video so I can then
upload to ourmedia/internetarchive. 

Can someone please help me here?

thanks,

Joseph Puentes
http://NuestraFamiliaUnida.com





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Remember when videoblogging was...

2005-12-17 Thread Christopher Weagel
Useful email tip:

Set the junk mail filters in your mail program to exclude and  
automatically delete mail from distasteful posters.

Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com



On Dec 17, 2005, at 8:08 PM, bottomunion wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Make some more p-money bird vids while you're at it ;)
 Susan
 http://vlog.kitykity.com

 Susan, I think you have Bottom Union mixed up with Human Dog.  We  
 have nothing to do
 with Human Dog and the flith they're spewing over there.

 Erik Nelson
 www.bottomunion.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 God, you're right.

 Call in the UN. A great tragedy has befallen this once great giant.

 I sob for those days when it was just Jay and I in a tent together
 working on our novels.

 Jesus. This has caused me to really look into my life and really
 question things.

 As a result I'm going to go off into the forest for a few months and
 get re-acquainted with the video-blogging I knew.

 Thanks for this awakening.

 You have any workbooks or seminars that I could buy/attend?

 Chris Weagel
 www.human-dog.com





 On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:53 PM, chris_koehn wrote:

 ...independent journalism?

 ...connecting people?

 ...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?

 ...criticized for being too banal?

 ...an endless debate on what it really was?


 Now it's just myspace.com with video. And it's worse than blogging,
 with all the self
 promotion. People seem to act like the more they throw their link
 around, the better
 chance they have of being famous. It wasn't about that. Or maybe I
 was just being naive to
 think that something interesting/important like this would not be
 marketed from within by
 a bunch of sellouts.

 I see a few projects with a purpose coming together, and perhaps
 the communications
 part is still a major use of videoblogging. Maybe there's hope. I
 was never part of an old
 boy's network, but I was videoblogging when there were a handful of
 people on this list. I
 have seen this whole thing get transformed into something I don't
 like. I even once left
 this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing folks who
 spammed up the place with
 pseudo-philosophical ramblings about the nature of videoblogging
 rather than simply
 making content. It was kinda funny how some people who never really
 made anything had
 the energy and insight to define it...

 Well what do I know, my RSS feed shows only a handful of the
 glorious number of
 subscribers I once had (when I cared and tried), who wants to
 listen to me? I guess I will
 just scour fireant for the occasional gem, and stay subscribed to
 some of the stalwarts
 who crank out decent stuff.

 Bottom line: you videoblog, don't quit your day job.





  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
 ~--
 AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
 --- 
 -
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links














  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] such a Simpleton! Compression

2005-12-17 Thread Verdi
Hey Joseph,
Sorry about that. The tutorial uses Movie Maker from Service Pack 1
Here's how you do it with the current version (the one you have):
1. File  Save Movie File...
2. Choose My Computer, click Next
3. Give your file a name and choose a place to save it. click next
4. Choose Other Settings. Select Video for broadband (512kbps) from  
the dropdown. click next.
5. When it's finished compressing, click Finish.
That's it.
Verdi

--
Me: http://michaelverdi.com
RD: http://graymattergravy.com
Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org



On Dec 17, 2005, at 9:08 PM, Joseph Puentes wrote:

 I just decided to learn how to vblog. It actually doesn't look to
 bad except that I can't get past a very basic step.

 I went to the Free Vlog tutorial at: http://freevlog.org/#compress

 I am using a Dell 4550 PC and have Windows Movie Maker. So I opened
 WMM and dragged and dropped an video clip (.avi) onto it while I was
 watching the tutorial video on compressing with WMM.

 On the tutorial it says to click on Save Movie and then go to
 other and to NTSC 768 etc.

 Well for the life of me I can't seem to find the Save Movie button
 and options to do the other and NTSC 768. [in fact that whole row is
 missing I see the menu items -file-edit-view- like in the tutorial and
 I see the row of items below that has undo, redo, tasks,  collections
 and that window, BUT the row with Save Movie Send Record is
 completely missing).

 I did a get info about Movie Maker and it says Microsoft Windows
 Movie Maker Version 5.1 (Build 2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519: Service
 Pack 2) Copyright 1981-2001 Microsoft Corp. Windows Movie Maker
 Version 2.1.4026.0

 Do I have an old version that needs updating? Or am I just blind
 (probably)?

 I can't get past step .5 on the compression of the video so I can then
 upload to ourmedia/internetarchive.

 Can someone please help me here?

 thanks,

 Joseph Puentes
 http://NuestraFamiliaUnida.com





  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links










 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [videoblogging] such a Simpleton! Compression

2005-12-17 Thread Jake Ludington


 On Behalf Of Joseph Puentes

 
 Well for the life of me I can't seem to find the Save Movie button
 and options to do the other and NTSC 768. [in fact that whole row is
 missing I see the menu items -file-edit-view- like in the tutorial and
 I see the row of items below that has undo, redo, tasks,  collections
 and that window, BUT the row with Save Movie Send Record is
 completely missing).

You can get to Save Movie one of two ways:

1) File  Save Movie File

2) On the toolbar below File, Edit, View click on the button that says Tasks
and expand the Finish Movie section. You can also reveal the Tasks list from
View  Tasks.

Jake Ludington

Author - Easy Digital Home Movies
http://iMakeMedia.com

http://www.jakeludington.com
http://www.sync2play.com




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/