This is not a working link if you aren't aware.;
Regards
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:18 AM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> file:///tmp/Screenshot_2023-10-12_17-16-26.png
>
--
>From R. Lee
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:30 AM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 2/5/23 20:52, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > I notice the rock garden, specifying Murphy.
>
> I award Murphy the patent title of Champion. Currently planning to
> record it as Rock Garde
I think that you don't need to ask 'hard questions' about why trans people
are trans. I'm quite open about my gender and why I'm trans, but I don't
think anything I have said in any way invited 'hard questions' to be posed
about the subject. Sure, I have spoken from a more academic perspective
abou
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 2:42 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> (I'm not sure where discussions are, but I think something needs to be done
> right now. A proposal will take some time to pass anyways, but at least it
> will be something to look towards a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 3:42 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 2:24 PM nix via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I intend, without objection, to transfer 5000 coins from the L&FD to
> > myself.
> >
> >
In the usual case I would have been emailed or messaged in some way which
means I would be able to see the message. I was offline the whole time this
message was unedited. It can't be to me if it never reached me at any point.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, 4:45 am nix via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@ag
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 4:16 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 2/20/22 20:49, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-02-21 at 02:47 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> > business wrote:
> >> The dice roll was: 41
> >> This is R2137,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:40 AM Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Ned Strange via agora-official wrote:
>
> > Fora
> >
> >
> > The publicity switch values (Rule 478) are self-ratifyi
You can't reply to d. Wet by discussion because e won't see it, e
intentionally chooses not to subscribe to the discussion list.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021, 8:56 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/9/2021 3:13 PM, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:
> > I
oh sorry
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:05 PM Telna via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 2021-08-09 11:54, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> > G. isn't an interested judge (as is correctly listed on your report).
> It's
> > t
G. isn't an interested judge (as is correctly listed on your report). It's
too late now, but.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:44 AM Telna via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3923. I assign it to G.
>
> =
>
> The quoted message is a distribution message as o
Nah I don't think the proposal would do anything if enacted. The pronoun
can only have one referent and the referent is G, in the action of sejdinf
an email
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 11:11 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 17:59 -0700, Ker
This is ineffective because your finger was resolved this week, you'll have
to wait until about 3 hours from now, new week utc. Said this on discord
just saying on list for posterity.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 6:30 AM Trigon via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I gain a justice
I know. that's why it's in the rules, though
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 12:11 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 8/6/21 9:49 PM, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I think we allow people to make multiple actions in one
I think we allow people to make multiple actions in one message because
it's often a useful and necessary shortcut. I think it's possible to make
two simultaneous actions by sending 2 emails with the same timestamp, to
the second. So there isn't a good reason not to allow simultaneous actions
in on
take itself from the
treasuror's previous report which will disregard some transactions) but
does that work?
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:19 PM Ned Strange wrote:
> Ah, I see the buoyancy issue. You wouldn't have time to flip the switch. I
> retract the proposal decimation times 9. It
It is timed at the end of the month (as it says) as it says which avoids
the bouyancy problem, and likely the auction problem.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021, 2:13 PM Trigon via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 06/08/2021 03:44, Ned Strange via agora-business wrote:
I do believe this proposal is effective. It only needs to specify its text.
For future reference, proposals usually have a title and an adoption index
equal to the power of what it does. Power is essentially a ranking of how
important rules are and when creating a new rule it's important to note
w
Test
--
>From V.J. Rada
I think it might be time to start using the method of doing actions by
directly messaging each player
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I am getting BUS including your tests
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> I hav
I am getting BUS including your tests
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I haven't received anything from BUS in my inbox for 48 hours.
> It's clear froM DIS that others have, I'm missing major threads.
> Is anyone else NOT receiving from BUS (but is from DIS?) Never
> ha
youre obligated to make a weekly proposal pool report, simply saying
that it contains a proposal you wish would be withdrawn doesn't count
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Here's a draft. I have a bad feeling that I'm missing something, but
> there's been a ton of traffic a
I never actually pended it or submitted it to the proposal pool
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal. V.J., you might want to retract
> yours, as I've fixed a ton of bugs and included it in this.
>
> -Aris
> ---
>
> Title: Minimalist Contracts v2
aren't people specifically banned from changing rules to all caps or
from them in this way
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Despite this being a meaningful semantic change, it's also a blatantly
> obvious typo fix. Without objection, I intend to change the text
> "SHALL" to
that cfj decided that the sillyness of an action is an inextricable conditional.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Benjamin Schultz
wrote:
> Testing the lmits of Sillyness by contract, I act on behalf of VJ Rada to
> issue a trust token to me. Because the open-ended nature of the contract
> is ju
;>
>>> also set
>>>>>>
>>>>>> never to eat Agora stuff) so it probably never entered my technical
>>>>>
>>>>> domain
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of control.
>>>>>> ---
>&
sment of what "significantly harms" you is more
> accurate than mine, so since you disagree, I believe that means my actions on
> your behalf fail.
>
> I didn't mean to cause any offense, I just thought it was amusing. :)
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Mes
it doesn't, do it again
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Could you guys let me do one thing in this game without pointing out how I
> messed up?
>
> Okay, okay. Here's a flimsy argument for why this works:
>
> I could only possibly transfer items to myself from a facility o
n't see a misplaced opening curly
> brace?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:48 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
>> Reenact not renact. there's a misplaced { in the middle of the
>> second-last change.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Aris Mercha
Reenact not renact. there's a misplaced { in the middle of the
second-last change.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Okay, here's a contracts system based on the model proposed by G. I
> welcome any clean-up suggestions or other improvements, although I
> think I've kept it
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> Will this work? No. But I hate complicated systems that nobody uses.
>> And this one is incomprehensible and not what the game is really about
>> anymore. So I'm m
It's a really badly written paragraph (I wrote it) and unreadable, so my
apologies for that. I couldn't be bothered to make a numbered list that
made sense
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Ah, I misread a conjunction in that rule. apologies.
>
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Ari
Don't we have a CFJ ruling that trying to insert apathy wins in a report
was an abuse? Or it might have been the opposite. But I vividly remember
such a CFJ.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> y'know, that was a silly reaction. I give 2 incense to Corona.
>
> On Sun, 10 J
Classic
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Corona wrote:
> I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be awarded a Medal of
> Honour for June 2018. For this decision, the valid options are {}. The
> vote collector is the Herald, and the voting method is instant-runoff.
> Quorum is 6.
>
> ~Corona
>
holy shit i have 19 paper and 80 coins i'm a rich boi maybe i should
actually pay attention to this land system
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Corona wrote:
> (This report is also a revision of the last report)
>
>
> +-++++---+++
> +++---
hate pop culture but sure
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:12 AM, C. V. wrote:
> Um, I have a lot on my plate, so I'm going to post the actual regulations
> tomorrow or on Saturday (sorry), but I'd like to hear what would you all
> think of a Pokémon-themed tournament where you would actually walk aroun
is e still around?
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> This is a notice of honor
>>
>> -1 Agora
>>
>> +1 Agora
>>
>> ---*---
>>
>> I CFJ the following: The above is a notice of honor.
>>
>
> This is CFJ 3638. I assign it to Gaelan.
>
>
> Grat. Arguments
goddamnit this is why I have to start reading emails top-down.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Well, you were named as a co-author! :P
>
> That's good. I thought it was probably a mistake, but I wanted to make
> sure.
>
> I create the following proposal:
>
> --
Noo! MY POWER IN THIS GAME IS GONE.
welcome back
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Yes it was possible and yes you just did so.
>
> Great to have you (almost or in summer) back!!
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > Given my imminen
Welcome! I assume your nickname is twg?
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I intend to register as a player at this time. I cause myself to receive a
> Welcome Package.
>
> - twg
--
>From V.J. Rada
with
> that.
> >
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Kerim Aydin
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 24 May 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> > > > Can we recruit new players lol? I miss o for one. And the japanese
> >
Can we recruit new players lol? I miss o for one. And the japanese
character guy. 6-7 is far less than we once had.
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:17 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > What could maybe be done is have Offices be "self-service" in a way. If
> you
The only reason I'm apathetic/not bidding is I don't know how much stuff I
have because there's no Treasuror. And I didn't get paid I think because I
forgot to apologize and I can't pend proposals now because A: I didn't get
paid B: Two paper a month and ugh it's just an apathy recipe.
On Wed, May
oh man if we're doing this you have to repeal zombieception rip. i
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> The game was always fair to begin with, because everyone had the same
> chance.
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:09 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> > Because he wants to make the game fa
>1) Zombies are popular, and the zombie owners probably have the majority of
>votes by now. Most recent attempt to nerf them has been blocked by VJ Rada
>(alone!)
Seven people voted present for no good reason!!!
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Hr it feels like joining
ling this might just be my client, though.
> I don't see how this could be a list-side issue.
>
>
> On 5/20/2018 7:49 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
>
>> I got no email for the past several days then just this morning about
>> 20
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:48
don't you have to track Owes a Scare switches?
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Registrar's Weekly Report
> ---
I got no email for the past several days then just this morning about 20
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> The mail list archives, eg.
> https://agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/
> seem to be redirecting to github pages and then 404ing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
sorry.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> E never was a zombie e's published often enough to prevent that.
>
> On Fri, 18 May 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> > You're still a zombie until you unambiguously flip ur switch
> >
> > O
Right, there was both an Assessor report and a "gamestate convergence"
version. The gamestate convergence version listed 10 votes but obviously 9
voters. I missed G's x2 vote so called the CFJ incorrectly. So its result
is clearly wrong, of course. The quorum is 7.
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:19 PM,
I object: do this by proposal
On Saturday, May 5, 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I intend to ratify the following document without objection:
> { No pledges existed on 04 May 18 19:55:00 UTC }
>
>
> The above document is not correct. The pledges in existence before
> ratification are listed i
This isn't a Notice, no reasons specified.
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Oh, I must've missed that message. Oops. Either way, thanks for this
> deputization.
>
> Notice of Honour: +1 Corona; -1 Telnaior
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018, 13:09 Corona wrote:
>
>> Sorry, G. judged t
I think G and I with our 6 votes between us can block anything, or at
least anything with more than 1 AI. Funny.
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Alright. You can consider it weakened in the way I suggested. However,
> I need to see which of these changes has has consensus.
I have all my assets back but I have no idea how many lol. Treasurors
are important.
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 1 May 2018, Corona wrote:
>> Consent - Rule 2519, maybe?
>
> The thing is, I think it requires a contract to pass on act-on-behalf,
> and quazie ca
If you voted for G's recent proposal you are eligible
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:45 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> I know, I was referring to what the proposal/scam was.
>
>
> On 4/29/2018 2:33 PM, Corona wrote:
>>
>> Nothing in particular is specified in the rule, in practice it's for
>> scamming/passing a
Sorry! I'm still traumatized by the brief period where I had to
initiate Agoran Decisions.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Per Rule 879, failing to state quorum is illegal but does not invalidate
> the decision.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018
If I did use PSS, there would have been 10 voters and the quorum would be 8.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I call a CFJ with the statement "If an Agoran Decision were now
> initiated, the quorum would be 8".
>
> The official Assessment recently pub
N I was a second away from using my zombie to appoint myself speaker.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:31 AM Edward Murphy wrote:
>
>> Aris wrote:
>>
>> > I object strongly, given that e is inactive. I don't think a zombie
>> should
>> > hold
I do.
>>
>> While it communicates a general intent, I think it's pretty important (and
>> in the rules) that "act on behalf" or some strong indication thereof of the
>> act-on-behalf mechanism being used, and I don't think this message rises
>> to that
Can't we just use a phrase like "whenever a rule states that somebody
shall pay, but does not specify a recipient of the payment" I would
like our ruleset to be as understandable as possible, please.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:01 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
>
> On 4/26/2018 8:53 PM, Aris Merc
What was the scam?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> The zombie thing wasn't an immediate response to that part of the scam.
> TBH, I'm really really tired (I've got a cold at the moment), and I missed
> the fact that there was even a scam to start with, thinking instead tha
Excuse me, these are 2 CFJs. Would Agora see fit to interpret my
actions as assigning both CFJs to myself?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I assign this CFJ to myself, being without objections.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
>&
The Assessor doesn't have a report does e, just vote reporting right? What
> info are you thinking about?
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> I point my finger at the Treasuror for failing to publish eir weekly
>> report since Apr 2
>>
>> Also I
Yes, I know.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>
>> I repeal Regulation 1.1
>
>
> I think those were all default values anyway.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Ari
#repealallregulations.com
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I repeal Regulation 1.1
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> The ACORN (Agora Nomic C
Relatively few people exist for me to give karma to at the moment.
Wish we had more active players!
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Corona wrote:
>
>
> Court:
>
> KarmaEntity
> -
> SAMURAI
> -
> +4 Aris <-- SHOGUN
> +3 G.
> +2 Trigon
> +2 ATMunn
> +1
I'm sure some of these pledges have been destroyed, including most of mine.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> The Police Blotter (Referee's Weekly Report)
> ---
uot;you can't play that card so just put it back in your hand" and "you
> can't peek at my cards but oops you did it anyway - penalty."
>
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> Can't we just amend rule 2466 "If the rules mean that someone CAN a
ng the "is allowed to" language instead of CAN is
>> that it triggers the whole method in R2466, that includes a CAN,
>> specifies how to do it, and includes legal consequences.
>> Putting a CAN here without all that language doesn't have a method
>> (by announceme
Exactly, nothing should automatically prohibit illegal actions.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> At least that was the direct and specific intent when I wrote it - I
>> intended
>> illegal actions on behalf of zombies to fail b
I think there are two CFJs which players intended to assign
themselves: they should now do so.
--
>From V.J. Rada
I reposted it to business
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> This was Nttpf I think.
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, 12:55 AM Ned Strange wrote:
>
>> I vote as follows:
>> 8033: PRESENT
>> 8034: FOR
>> 8035: FOR
>> 8036: FOR
>> 803
you liked. :P
>
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> The registrar does have to track these btw. I don't know if e is doing
>> so, but any Registrar report with no emotions is not a report.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Kenyon Prater
>> wro
I vote as follows:
8033: PRESENT
8034: FOR
8035: FOR
8036: FOR
8037: FOR
8038: AGAINST, foiled by power
8039: Regrettably, FOR
8040: AGAINST. I think 5 blots+3 a month will be more than enough for
everybody to be blot-free, which means that there is no incentive to
buy temples (paper is the only re
The registrar does have to track these btw. I don't know if e is doing
so, but any Registrar report with no emotions is not a report.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> I flip my emotions switch to Meloncholy at the thought of losing the
> Emotions rule
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2
Yes.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Should we repeal the emotions rule? No one seems to be using it.
>
> -Aris
--
>From V.J. Rada
Doesn't it still work? I think any reasonable person would understand
that 1 corn= 3 apples with that text.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Oh, one that I'd forgotten about: the place in Rule 2003 where it says
> "Players CAN, while performing the above actions, substitute
We should probably just remove the (syn. consents)
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
>>
>> > I withdraw my and Quazie's (acting on eir behalf) support for the
>> > destruction of "Hi" - let'
or something of them back? Whatever it is, we'd
>> > need to come up with something that no one would object to, considering
>> > that the contract can only be amended without objection (also always a bad
>> > idea not to provide a way to amend a contract).
>> >
>
ges effect is legitimate (TBH, not sure
> whether that would work either).
>
> -Aris
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:20 AM Ned Strange
> wrote:
>
>> It wasn't really a scam it was going to be used for a perfectly
>> legitimate application of zombiception!
>>
&g
t 1/2 or 3/4 or something of them back? Whatever it is, we'd
> need to come up with something that no one would object to, considering
> that the contract can only be amended without objection (also always a bad
> idea not to provide a way to amend a contract).
>
> -Aris
>
&g
I really do think that me losing all of my assets over this is inequitable.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> That is, I object for myself and PSS to Aris's intent
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
>> I object both for myself and PS
Too late, but this proposal should also have excised the last
paragraph of "Referee Accountability"
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> I pend this proposal by expending a paper.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> I submit the following
I do have a question. What does fabric do?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> After thinking this whole thing through, I'm not sure that it's actually a
> problem if people with zombies have tons of money. It's completely possible
> to amass a fortune by living off of public
We could change the Boo Lien switches to some serious requirement
instead of just "something scary" so that zombies actually are costly
to hold on to.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
>> I think Corona was talking about the thing
hat would govern
> your question - the standard would be that evidence would have to
> exist eg in an email that all parties agreed to a particular thing).
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> Hey absolute hypothetical fellas: what would happen if I made a
>> contra
osition of assets unknowable to that technology?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I create the following contract and transfer to it all of my assets. I
> also have PSS join this contract, acting on eir behalf. This contract
> appears to be a scam, having PSS join it is
Also (as the person who made this paragraph because I couldn't be
assed to format bullet points), we really need to fix that massive
sentence with a bracketed list within the first clause regarding when
cards may be imposed.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> So
FJ should stop the 14-day clock on punishment).
>>
>> Given that there has been no time in the recent past that I had sufficient
>> support to do the job in question within the time limit, my initial
>> attempt that failed was as good as any other attempt would have been.
&
a rule that said "if any report's
time period is not specified, it's weekly" or something of the like,
but I cannot find it now.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
>>I deputize for the Registrar
>
> You'll have to do this again.
>
> On W
n Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I point my finger at V.J. Rada for failing to publish the Notary's weekly
>> report. In general I agreee with G.'s two week rule, but in this case the
>> person responsible failed to publish the report after being elected to
eferee: Impose justice, declare shenanigans, OR CFJ/point to an
> existing CFJ.
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> I point my finger at G. for failing to attempt to deregister each
>> inactive player. I suppose that because this isn't officially related
>> to th
message --
> From: *Ned Strange*
> Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018
> Subject: DIS: what happened to the silver quill this year
> To: "Agora Nomic discussions (DF)"
>
>
> see title
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
>
>
> --
>
> ~Corona
--
>From V.J. Rada
see title
--
>From V.J. Rada
is
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> I favor this one.
>>
>> As we haven't heard from the Arbitor for a bit, I intend to assign it
>> to myself without 3 objections.
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strang
Do other people believe my interpretation is correct?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> The Regulations rule states that "Regulations may be repealed by their
> promulgator". o. was the promulgator of the regulation you refer to, so I
> believe I cannot r
The Regulations rule states that "Regulations may be repealed by their
promulgator". o. was the promulgator of the regulation you refer to, so I
believe I cannot repeal or amend that Regulation.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun,
Also point your finger for my failure to cause sustenance payments in the
first Eastman Week if you like
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I point my finger at V.J. Rada for failing to publish the Notary's weekly
> report. In general I a
actually this is probably doable by contract. would anyone be interested in
a contract that accomplished this?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Auctions should just be auto-transfer of funds tbh. Like to make a bid you
> have to put the money in escrow and when the a
if it wasn't for the title i would be worried jeez
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> I submit the following proposal, "Nothing to worry about", AI-1.
> Co-authors: omd, pokes, o.
>
> I spend 1 paper to pend it.
>
> ---
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
