+1!
"Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/05/2002 11:52 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
Re: [WSIF] [PROPOSAL]Additional contribution
... JCA (J2C) provider
+1 f
+1 from me!
- Original Message -
From:
Jeremy Hughes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:19
AM
Subject: [WSIF] [PROPOSAL]Additional
contribution ... JCA (J2C) provider
Hi[Apologies if you
have this more than once.]A team in IBM (Piotr P
Alek,
On the JCA side of this discussion ... I believe WSIF is sufficiently
modularised right now to introduce the JCA code. I can update build.xml to
conditionally compile the JCA provider only if the right pre-requisite
classes are on the classpath.
Jeremy
Aleksander Slominski wrote:
hi,
tha
Title: RE: [WSIF] [PROPOSAL]Additional contribution ... JCA (J2C) provid er
Thanks. It helps a lot.
Do you know if there are any other projects (either open source or from specific vendors) similar to WSIF?
I am trying to get a picture as clear as possible of what is currently being done in
PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: [WSIF] [PROPOSAL]Additional contribution ... JCA (J2C)
provid er
I checked quickly on http://alphaworks.ibm.com without finding any
documentation about the JCA provider for WSIF.
Any idea where I can find that?
We are current
PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
.edu>Subject: Re: [WSIF]
[PROPOSAL]Addi
hi,
that sound wonderful!
however can we postpone integration into main src/ tree until we have
modularized it
into WSIF API and set of providers - that will allow users to compile
only providers
they need (and have libraries for) and will make more explicit what
are required
dependencies for eac
Title: RE: [WSIF] [PROPOSAL]Additional contribution ... JCA (J2C) provider
I checked quickly on http://alphaworks.ibm.com without finding any documentation about the JCA provider for WSIF.
Any idea where I can find that?
We are currently creating an application (J2EE application with
+1! Very nice indeed ..
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:19 PM
Subject: [WSIF] [PROPOSAL]Additional contribution ... JCA (J2C) provider
> Hi
>
> [Apologies if you have this more than once.
+1 to both a) and b). Sounds like fun. But please make sure that there are enough test
+cases.
Thanks,
-- dims
--- Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> [Apologies if you have this more than once.]
>
> A team in IBM (Piotr Przybylski, Michael Beisiegel and Hesham Fahmy) have
> dev
>, Jeremy Hughes/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Paul
Fremantle/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Sanjiva Weerawarana/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
Subject:Re: WSIF proposal - committer list?
Sam
I'd like to have the following as committers - they are all regular
contributors to our internal CVS:
Paul Fremantle ([EMAI
Oh - and I like pzf :-)
Thanks,
Paul
- Original Message -
From:
Jeremy Hughes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Anthony Elder ; Mark
Whitlock ; Owen D
Burroughs
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal - committer
list?
For the CVS ids
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeremy Hughes/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Paul Fremantle/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Sanjiva Weerawarana/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal - committer list?
Sam
I'd like to have the following as committers - they are all regular
contribu
m> cc:
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
17/05/02 09:16
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal - committer list?
> Sanjiva,
>
> Can you please ask Paul to send a consolidated list. Since he's the one
driving the contribution.
> I'd be EXTREMELY HAPPY if all the folks turn out to b
Sanjiva,
Can you please ask Paul to send a consolidated list. Since he's the one driving the
contribution.
I'd be EXTREMELY HAPPY if all the folks turn out to be regular contributors...Of
course when other
people start working regularly they can be added as committers as well.
Thanks,
dims
--
Alex Slomominski, Nirmal Mukhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Matt Duftler
and I were the original developers of WSIF along with Paul Fremantle
(from IBM UK). Paul will send in his own list, but I'd like Alek
(now at Indiana University) Nirmal, Matt and I to be committers
from our team.
Sanjiva.
- O
+1 from over here too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
> -- dims
>
> --- James M Snell <[
you wherever you
> go.
> - Joshua 1:9
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject:Re: WSIF proposal
>
>
>
> Ok
>
> So I believe we are in the position of
>
> CV
596000952
==
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified,
do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
ow is good!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> I agree whole-heartedly with Sam. Incubate first, Proposal for
"WebServices PMC&quo
I agree whole-heartedly with Sam. Incubate first, Proposal for "WebServices PMC"
later.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Freemantle wrote:
> >
> > it might
> > be worth starting the discussion with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> My experience is that it won't spark any addit
Paul Freemantle wrote:
>
> it might
> be worth starting the discussion with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My experience is that it won't spark any additional discussion there as the
people who would be interested in the subject are also subscribed here.
This also goes to the heart of why I believe that web s
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> Sam,
> Do you think we are ready for a "Web Services PMC" discussion? James
thinks we do.
I'd prefer to see Axis released first.
- Sam Ruby
being
bounced around. Perhaps we could progress in parallel?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:26 PM
Subject: RE: WSIF proposal
> Ok. I agree with the package name (org.apa
- Original Message -
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:00 AM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> Sanjiva,
>
> I agree that Web Services needs its own top level project. But we don't
have eno
the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: WSIF proposal
Ok. I agree with the package name (org.apache.wsif.*)
Paul, Is it ok for WSIF to be under Axis (website, module name etc)?
Ok. I agree with the package name (org.apache.wsif.*)
Paul, Is it ok for WSIF to be under Axis (website, module name etc)? If yes, am ok with
xml-axis-wsif. This choice will definitely save time. If you want to bring it up on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], you can count on my support. Its upto you.
Sam,
Do
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> Ok. I change my vote.
>
> +1 for xml-wsif
> +1 for org.apache.wsif.*
Your vote for xml-wsif is one of the ones that does count, but it should be
presented on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (IMHO). My feeling is that we should
head towards the thought of a web services PMC and broa
ame.
>
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Fremantle
> Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
>
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, was avalon also created to do one thing and then
> grown or was it always a framework of projects? (I'm not familiar
> with it at all.)
Avalon and Turbine started out as single projects.
- Sam Ruby
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> I agree we don't have enough to create a WS project yet. Why not
> just create new projects under XML until that condition is met?
>
> So I'd vote for xml-wsif and org.apache.wsif.*. I agree with Dug
> that consistency is important.
>
> I'm planning on working on the
mmanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified,
do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: WSIF proposal
Sanjiva,
I agree that Web Services need
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Fremantle
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
Hi Dims,
I agree we don't have enough to create a WS project yet. Why not
just create new projects under XML until that condition is met?
So I'd vote for xml-wsif and org.apache.wsif.*. I agree with Dug
t
>
> > Apart from the length :-) I'd prefer that we kept a simple package name.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, M
"Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We can mirror Avalon and its sub-projects concept for a broader view of
Axis
>
I don't subscribe to that view .. sorry.
Out of curiosity, was avalon also created to do one thing and then
grown or was it always a framework of projects? (I'm not
s
>
> If we are going to move to an overall WebServices story, I'd rather not name
> the package org.apache.axis.wsif.*
>
> Apart from the length :-) I'd prefer that we kept a simple package name.
>
> Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dav
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> Sanjiva,
>
> I agree that Web Services needs its own top level project. But we don't
have enough "stuff" to do
> so. IMHO we need more initiatives targeting various portio
Sanjiva,
I agree that Web Services needs its own top level project. But we don't have enough
"stuff" to do
so. IMHO we need more initiatives targeting various portions of the Web Services
protocol stack
before we can do so. Using Axis as an incubator is a step in that direction.
Thanks,
dims
> What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is
> some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an
I don't agree that Axis is a brand for Apache Web services! Axis
as created as the Apache SOAP replacement project and I continue to
support it
41 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: WSIF proposal
Dug
What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is
some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an
XML project (it
umber of web services
> components that work together, but on the other hand I'd also like to get
> the CVS tree set up this month :-)
>
> Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Doug Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
Sounds like a good idea.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> Personally, I'm not sure there is a lot of synergy between the XML
own
home.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> Paul,
>
> In the interest of t
see a number of web services
components that work together, but on the other hand I'd also like to get
the CVS tree set up this month :-)
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:36 P
p; Associates, ISBN
0596000952
==
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified,
do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: WSIF prop
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> Steve Loughran wrote:
> >
> > > > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons?
>
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
> More deeply, I'm wondering if xml and web services are emerging as
> separate communities.
They are just as close as TCP is to HTTP, or HTTP to SOAP - one uses the
other.. but really - is there synergy between a nail and a hammer. Though
sold in the same s
Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> > > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons?
>
> and does it contain a sandbox to mirror jakarta-commons/sandbox?
Not yet.
More deeply, I'm wondering if xml and web services are emerging as separate
communities.
- Sam Ruby
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> Steve Loughran wrote:
> >
> > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons?
>
and doe
Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons?
Yes.
- Sam Ruby
Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons?
I was wondering, not only because this WSIF could start off there, but
because as I was thinking of looking at how hard it would be to write some
.NET code to work with Java hash tables, and it doesnt make sense to put
that into jakarta-commons,
Paul,
In the interest of time, do you want to send me the updated code? I can place it in
the proposal
directory as i did before (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-axis/java/proposal/)
Thanks,
dims
--- Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks
>
> We have done the updates to WSIF
If the package name is org.apache.wsif (not org.apache.axis.wsif) why would
the tree be named xml-axis-wsif instead of just xml-wsif?
-Dug
"Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/15/2002 10:30:04 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:WSIF proposal
54 matches
Mail list logo
