--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: Bitter Melons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable
view.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julia wrote:
Dan Minette wrote:
Its true that you can find some historian on any side of an
issue. That
doesn't mean that there is not a good way to determine what is
likely,
unlikely, and very very unlikely. For
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BULLY!
Now was this Bully! meant in the sense that you think Eric is
someone who
picks on people he thinks are weaker than him, or in the sense of
strong
agreement as was the
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:33:22AM -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
addressed vehemently if desired/necessary, but rather that I'm
generally against rude or insulting posts intended to get a person to
shut up or unsubscribe to the list.
I haven't seen any posts that stated that intention. Have you?
Michael Harney wrote:
For one, I want heavy penalties levied against companies that off-shore
work. Call it an intelectual property terrif if you like. Second, I want
the government to establish work programs with that money so that people put
out of work by off-shoring are able to have some
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:35:59AM -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
Anyone have any ideas what that might be?
Radium, mixed with a phosphor, can make a nifty glow in the dark effect.
It used to be used extensively in watch dials. A friend of mine tells a
(possibly apocryphal) story how the makers of
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:21:20 -0600
At 07:13 AM 2/28/04, Travis Edmunds wrote:
From:
Well, you're half right (2/3). Again, as long as we are being
honest, the posts of yours that I have read have been a waste
of my time. Not surprising you and Rob would enjoy each
other's babble. Although it is disappointing that you make so
little effort to discern sense from nonsense
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:33:22AM -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
addressed vehemently if desired/necessary, but rather that I'm
generally against rude or insulting posts intended to get a person to
shut up or unsubscribe to the list.
I haven't seen any posts that
http://www.democracynow.org/
EXCLUSIVE BREAKING NEWS:
PRESIDENT ARISTIDE SAYS 'I WAS KIDNAPPED'
'TELL THE WORLD IT IS A COUP'
Multiple sources that just spoke with Haitian President Jean-Bertrand
Aristide told Democracy Now! that Aristide says he was kidnapped and
taken by force to the Central
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of curiosity, and without wanting to get into the whole is it
good/is it bad/is it fair thing:
What is it that the people who complain about off-shoring (which is
quite different to out-sourcing BTW) want done about it.
Isn't America built on Free Enterprise?
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:52:16 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you'd asked one of them if the subject of the war was slavery
or
states rights, they'd have said states rights.
Of course, the particular states right they were so concerned
about losing was slavery.
- jmh
What exactly does it take to get The Fool to stop attacking brinellers?
It's happened in at least 3, possibly more emails in less than 30 days. I'm
tired of opening my mail and seeing Kneem spew hate-filled insults at JDG.
All the other people on this list who disagree with JDG manage to do
From: Jan Coffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actualy it was. It was fought over the states rights to be a
differnt country. Seriously though, do you think that the average
foot soldiure in the confederacy did not believe in the retoric of
the time?
No, it was fought over the states rights
From: Russell Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Harney wrote:
For one, I want heavy penalties levied against companies that off-shore
work. Call it an intelectual property terrif if you like. Second, I
want
the government to establish work programs with that money so that people
put
out
Erik Reuter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:35:59AM -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
Anyone have any ideas what that might be?
Radium, mixed with a phosphor, can make a nifty glow in the dark effect.
It used to be used extensively in watch dials. A friend of mine tells a
(possibly
Horn, John wrote:
From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you'd asked one of them if the subject of the war was slavery
or
states rights, they'd have said states rights.
Of course, the particular states right they were so concerned
about losing was slavery.
Which was the
--- Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which was the primary concern of the politicians and
the people in
power, but *not* of most of the infantry.
The leaders meant X, said Y, the rank-and-file
believed Y.
Julia
You know you're both stepping into a bit of a
historical
From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What exactly does it take to get The Fool to stop attacking brinellers?
It's happened in at least 3, possibly more emails in less than 30 days.
I'm
tired of opening my mail and seeing Kneem spew hate-filled insults at
JDG.
All the other people on
I'd heard they'd licked the *brushes* to get them
wet for a finer point
for painting the radium on the bits of the dials
they were supposed to
paint.
A lot of detail painters (FREX in the gaming miniature
hobby) still do this. I personally refuse to do so,
even though supposedly it does
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=storycid=540e=2u=/ap/egypt_entrapping_gays
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=storycid=581e=2u=/nm/20040301/tc_nm/leisure_games_dc
fit's with my anicdotal evidence.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actualy it was. It was fought over the states rights to be a
differnt country. Seriously though, do you think that the average
foot soldiure in the confederacy did not believe in
I'm not going to sit back and let JDG make extremely
homophobic and
misogynist remarks without calling him on it.
Because that's what he's
writing. He's an apologist for homophobes and he
and his arguments lend
a veneer or legitimacy to the hate movement. All he
does is feed the
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is perhaps the greatest irony (among many) of the
Civil War that perhaps the single most important
reason for the South's defeat - the genius of Abraham
Lincoln - could _only_ be utilized in the meritocratic
North, where a dirt-poor farm boy had the
It is perhaps the greatest irony (among many) of the
Civil War that perhaps the single most important
reason for the South's defeat - the genius of Abraham
Lincoln - could _only_ be utilized in the meritocratic
North, where a dirt-poor farm boy had the chance to
rise to the Presidency, something
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable
view.
Some of those doing the fighting were fighting for states'
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that will what you mean, or was Lincoln critical
on a strategic/tactical
level?
-bryon
Oh no. You realize that you've made a critical
mistake here, right Bryon? I can blabber on this
topic for _hours_. People have been known to bleed at
the ears
--- Kevin Tarr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to bring back the discussions of the
American generals; just a
simple question. I'm assuming you are not saying
Lincoln was a genius war
president. I've only read Gods and Generals,
otherwise I know little about
the war. It seemed that
I can make a clear distinction between libertarianism and syndico-anarchism
that has been making a comeback.
Also, I tend to equate libertariansim with social darwinism. Though both have
different histories and rationales both political-economic camps tend to
produce identical results.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un-
reasonable
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable
view.
So, was Southern defeat inevitable? I would actually
say, in
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If any of the
other Republicans won, it
would be hard to see how the US would have emerged
as a major world player.
Is that a fair assessment?
Dan M.
I believe that it is, yes. I think that if anyone
else had won the election, the South would have
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If any of the
other Republicans won, it
would be hard to see how the US would have emerged
as a major world player.
Is that a fair assessment?
Dan M.
Oh yes, one more point. I don't have the quotes close
at hand (they're in the last chapter of
The Fool wrote:
Let's see India, China, or Russia belly up to the bar and
pay their fair share of the hundreds-of-billions of dollars
per year being stolen from the US Taxpayer to make
outsourcing possible.
ritu wrote:
What does 'belly up to the bar' mean?
From context, I think it
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 5:23 PM
Subject: Re:L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable view.
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, your arguments
Perhaps it is a biased standard, but I see it a bit differently. First
let me clarify that
I'm not arguing that JDG's (or anyone else's) arguments should not be
criticized or
addressed vehemently if desired/necessary, but rather that I'm
generally against rude
or insulting posts intended to
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, I thought you were done with this thread long ago... Why are you
still here?
You thought wrong. Read what I wrote. Did you see the word thread? I
was writing to a specific person. Although, that doesn't mean I AM
going
Trent Shipley wrote:
I can make a clear distinction between libertarianism and syndico-anarchism
that has been making a comeback.
Also, I tend to equate libertariansim with social darwinism. Though both have
different histories and rationales both political-economic camps tend to
produce
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:59:33PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
I'd heard they'd licked the *brushes* to get them wet for a finer
point for painting the radium on the bits of the dials they were
supposed to paint.
I think you're right. It has been a few years since I heard the story,
but I
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, I don't see it as an argument of
inherent principal in
many/most cases; but as a pragmatic argument. The
same people who argue
things should be handled at the state level for X
tend to support uniform
federal standards on Y. This can
Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Reuter wrote:
Bryon Daly wrote:
Anyone have any ideas what that might be?
Radium, mixed with a phosphor, can make a nifty
glow in the dark effect.
It used to be used extensively in watch dials. A
friend of mine tells a
(possibly
- Original Message -
From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: This Is Spinal Ta-, er, Metallica
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion
--- Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big snip
Reminds me of the advice not to attempt calculus
while drunk. Don't drink and derive.
Guess this would be a PUI (Posting Under the
Influence)?
Is that pronounced pyoo-ey, alternate spelling
phewie? ;)
Pepe LePew Maru
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How could the South have won? How about no major
offensive operations, force the North into a grinding
war of attrition and denying it any major victories
while either getting European intervention (which
almost happened) or a Democratic victory in 1864
I
- Original Message -
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint (Was: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?)
From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What exactly does it take to get The Fool to stop
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint (Was: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?)
xponent
I'm Not Afraid If People Know My Real Name Maru
rob
That's just because
John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped most
I will repeat again. I would not have signed the
Bush vs. Gore majority
opinion had I been on the US Supreme Court. I do
not consider the Bush
vs. Gore ruling to be one that inspires confidence
for me.
Reasonable. And agreed.
--- Bryon Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had thought that most European sympathies lay with
the
North, given European distaste for slavery, and that
the
North did actually get some European aid? What
nation(s)
considered intervening on the South's side?
The sympathies of European
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Complaint (Was: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 14:17:46 -0600
From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What exactly does it take to get The
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable
view.
--- Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which was the primary
Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How could the South have won? How about no major
offensive operations, force the North into a grinding
war of attrition and denying it any major victories
while either getting European intervention (which
almost happened) or a
- Original Message -
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Complaint (Was: Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?)
- Original Message -
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sre! G
But could a dirt poor workhouse boy ever become
president?
The Advantages Of A Frontier Maru
rob
Thank you, Frederick Jackson Turner :-)
In all seriousness...Bill Clinton? Ronald Reagan?
Clinton grew up lower middle class at best,
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic, and a an Un- reasonable
view.
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sre! G
But
-Original Message-
From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:42 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: A few new words of which this list is in need
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, I thought you
--- Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I didn't see in his response -- the South
did a lot of trade
with Britain, so the Confederacy would have had
economic ties with
Britain.
Julia
Good point, Julia. I should have mentioned that. In
fact, the South really expected
--- Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh Crap!!!
I thought you were talking 19th century.
(hence the workhouse reference)
xponent
Been Dirt Poor Myself Maru
rob
Ahh...now I understand. Hmm, that's an interesting
question. Who was the first _urban_ President from a
poor family?
On Monday 2004-03-01 16:39, Julia Thompson wrote:
Trent Shipley wrote:
I can make a clear distinction between libertarianism and
syndico-anarchism that has been making a comeback.
Can you define syndico-anarchism for me?
Thank you.
Julia
My understanding of syndycho-anarchism is
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:34:00PM -0800, Chad Cooper wrote:
When I hear someone say Goodbye, particularly in the way you said
it, I ALWAYS assume that means they are about to leave,
I said goodbye to a specific person.
regular goodbye like I'll be see'n ya.. You have me confused at this
So, if it wasn't for luck of having Lincoln, we'd have a 20th century
without
the massive influence of the US. If any of the other Republicans won,
it
would be hard to see how the US would have emerged as a major world
player.
Is that a fair assessment?
I don't think so, because while we
And becouse ... BULLY!
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey, I thought you were done with this thread long ago... Why are
you
still here?
You thought wrong. Read what I wrote. Did you
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/fuzzball_blackholes_040301.html
Black holes may not be the smooth, featureless gravitational gluttons
long thought to completely devour any matter or information that
strays too close.
According to a new study, information may continue to exist long after
Significant findings from NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity,
now exploring Meridiani Planum on Mars, will be announced at a press
briefing at 2 p.m. EST, Tuesday, March 2, 2004, at NASA Headquarters,
Washington.
The briefing will originate from the James E. Webb Auditorium, 300 E
St.,
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:34:00PM -0800, Chad Cooper wrote:
When I hear someone say Goodbye, particularly in the way you
said
it, I ALWAYS assume that means they are about to leave,
I said goodbye to a specific person.
At 01:08 AM 3/1/2004 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
A question at hand is whether Iran, ruled by Shi'ite Moslems, is
gaining power amongst its co-religionists in Iraq?
This strikes me as having vestiges of xenophobic racism.
Shias are the majority religious denomination in Iraq. The US
At 03:57 PM 3/1/2004 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
I would actually point out that _none_ of this
necessarily has to be hypocrisy. The concept of
state's rights to me is not that _all things_ are
best determined at the state level, but that some
things are. Since the overwhelming trend since the
==
TOPFIVE.COM'S LITTLE FIVERS -- THE INTERNET
http://www.topfive.com/fivers.shtml
==
March 2, 2004
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:38:00AM -0700, Michael Harney wrote:
No, it's not nonsense, it's the only way that we can keep jobs in the
US, make it more expencive to off-shore work than to contract locally.
I never said they couldn't off-shore work, I just said there should be
fines associated
At 04:48 PM 3/1/2004 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
Not at all. But it is impossible for us, in the
modern context, to imagine a war like the American
Civil War. No Western power had fought a conflict
that devastating since 1815, and the United States has
never come close, before or since.
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:08 AM 3/1/2004 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
A question at hand is whether Iran, ruled by Shi'ite Moslems, is
gaining power amongst its co-religionists in Iraq?
This strikes me as having vestiges of xenophobic racism.
Shias are
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:49:13AM -0600, The Fool wrote:
Should we allow any trade at all with countries that engage in child
labor (by the hundred million), that are communist or fascist? No.
All that does is import the cancerous tendrils of communism here.
You've oversimplified. How do
At 07:17 PM 3/1/2004 -0500 Bryon Daly wrote:
I had thought that most European sympathies lay with the
North, given European distaste for slavery, and that the
North did actually get some European aid? What nation(s)
considered intervening on the South's side?
You forget the role rivalries in
At 03:13 PM 3/1/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some of those doing the fighting were fighting for states' rights, so
arguably it was *fought* over that.
A lot of those in the South put their state above the nation. Lee
At 03:03 PM 3/1/2004 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
And let's not say that _anyone_ knew in advance that
Lincoln would turn out to be what he turned out to be.
In retrospect we can look at Lincoln's life and see
the precursors of greatness before the Presidency, but
at the time nominating him when
--- John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, I believe that Antietam remains the most
deadly day in US history,
and that Shiloh remains the most deadly battle.
Given how close this conflict was to home, and for
how long it dragged on,
it is remarkable that the North did not
At 10:00 PM 3/1/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
This fits your (JDG's) MO perfectly. Why not have a tyranny of the
majority over the minorities? In fact why even give Sunni's, kurds or
christians any rights at all? After all they are only minorities, and
according you (JDG), any majority has the
--- John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O.k. Question wasn't the Fugitive Slave Act a
logical extension of
the full faith and credit clause (which I believe
was insisted upon
Southerns at the Constitutional Convention who were
worried about slavery
in the new Union - but I could
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:30:35PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote:
There is a very simple response to all of this:
Do you truly believe that America can make itself more prosperous by
making goods and services more expensive?
And the response, that unfortunately even the Bush administration
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Diseased Christian Mind wrote:
This strikes me as having vestiges of xenophobic racism.
Shias are the majority religious denomination in Iraq.
The US must consider a government dominated by Iraqi
Shias to not necessarily be a
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:31 PM 2/29/2004 -0500 Bryon Daly wrote:
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 02:40 AM 2/29/2004 -0500 Bryon Daly wrote:
* Disclaimer: Within reason. I admit that there are probably
certain
extreme views
on certain topics that would
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: The Fugitive Slave Act Re:L3 Bitter Mellons, Gin and Tonic,and
a an Un- reasonable view.
--- John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gorenfeld.net/blog//2004_02_01_barchive.html#1077827456395731
36
U.S. government to Moonies: You're our only hope for HIV education! Oh,
wait, sorry.
I've been looking into the mysterious case of why the Center For Disease
Control, at one point in 2003, came to the conclusion that
From: John D. Giorgis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a very simple response to all of this:
Do you truly believe that America can make itself more prosperous by
making goods and services more expensive?
And my very simple response to that is:
Do you truly believe that America can make itself
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:38:00AM -0700, Michael Harney wrote:
No, it's not nonsense, it's the only way that we can keep jobs in the
US, make it more expencive to off-shore work than to contract locally.
I never said they couldn't off-shore work, I
86 matches
Mail list logo
