> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 24 september 2002 19:25
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World
> Don't me killfile you.
I am not impressed. IMO, killfiling someone is done by people who
Sonja wrote:
Well it does seem an awfull many times that the
>peace price goes to those points of the globe were a Western subset seem to
>have a large interest in changing the current way of government. Hmmm.
>Coincidence?
*grins*
An incredible one. Kissinger won the noble peace prize because he
Russell Sherman wrote:
> >From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World
> >Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:51:50 +0200
> >
> >Steve Sloan II wrote:
> >
> > > "Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLW
Kevin Tarr wrote:
> I think this was more interesting:
>
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
>
> "Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
>
> Do you know your online rights? Have you received a letter asking you to
> remove information from a Web site or to stop engaging in an activity? Are
> you concerned
on 25/9/02 5:08 am, Dan Minette at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "BRIN-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:34 PM
> Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
>
>
>> on 25/9/0
Julia Thompson wrote:
> The Fool wrote:
> >
> > http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Living/reuters20020924_700.html
>
> Wow. So that may give us one more weapon in fighting brain cancer.
>
> 1st paragraph for anyone who needs further prodding to read the whole
> thing:
>
> PHILADELPHIA (Reuters Health) -
Aha!
So it is anti-Arab propaganda.
(Actually, it stands a good chance of being anti-Islamic status-quo,
pro-neo-Kemalist propaganda.)
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 10:13 am, The Fool wrote:
> > From: Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Van: The Fool [mailto:[EM
Dan Minette wrote:
>
>I think that, if one puts these different dictionaries together, one would
>have to include stuff like golf as a religion when one includes Marxism or
>Objectivism.
>
I would think that something with an all-encompassing philosophy like
Marxism would more closely resemble c
This is the kind of stuff I was talking about with nick:
http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft.htm
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
>From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World
>Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:51:50 +0200
>
>Steve Sloan II wrote:
>
> > "Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO" wrote:
> >
> > > > ARAB /
Steve Sloan II wrote:
> "Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO" wrote:
>
> > > ARAB / ISLAMIC NOBEL WINNERS
> > > 19.6% of World's Population
> > > 1.2 billion Muslims
> >
> >
> >
> > > JEWISH NOBEL WINNERS
> > > 0.2% OF WORLDS POPULATION
> > > 14.1 Million Jews
> >
> > I wonder what the use of t
Boy Named Sue
Written by Shel Silverstein and sung by Johnny Cash
For a good time listen to "Father of a boy named Sue" which Shel silverstien
sang himself, never being able to talk anyone else into it, due to it's
punch line...
-Russell
>From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten <[EMAIL PROTE
Jim Sharkey wrote:
> Baardwijk, J. wrote:
> >>Van: Alberto Monteiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>Aha, so the US is not the only country where you can give your
> >>>child pretty much any name you like. Poor kids.
> >>>
> >>Yes, here in Brazil we can also give any name. I think all
> >>democrat
>From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World
>Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:41:14 -0500
>
> > From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > on 25/9/02 3:09 am, The Fool at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
>From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
>Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:43:13 -0500
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "BRIN-L" <[EMAIL PROTE
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:47:00PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > I know for a fact that my isp has the messages sent to my address,
> > already separate. I don't actually have to re-separate them, they
are
> > already separate and can be downloaded indiv
Fooling around, I found some more dictionaries. I think Cambridge is
British or British/American because I found a mention of the differences.
So, I thought, who knows, maybe the difference is British vs. American
English
I obtained the following definition:
religion
noun
the belief in and wors
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BRIN-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
> on 25/9/02 3:43 am, Dan Minette at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> I thought we had alr
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:47:00PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> I know for a fact that my isp has the messages sent to my address,
> already separate. I don't actually have to re-separate them, they are
> already separate and can be downloaded individually. It is really
> simple to keep messages an
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:25:08PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > Doesent matter if the sender munges from to >from, not all senders
> > do, and from isn't neccessarily the first message header. (Getting
> > message headers mixed up between messages is ba
on 25/9/02 3:43 am, Dan Minette at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I thought we had already established on this list that
>>
>> 1) religious does not equal non-atheist
>> 2) atheist does not equal non-religious
>> 3) religious does not equal theist (or deist or pantheist even)
>
> Established means
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:25:08PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> Doesent matter if the sender munges from to >from, not all senders
> do, and from isn't neccessarily the first message header. (Getting
> message headers mixed up between messages is bad). In any case your
> sender didn't munge the fro
Deborah Harrell wrote:
> This reminds me of a short story I read (can't
> remember the author at the moment - Him?) in which
> computers (or maybe it was cyborgs?) get all the
> interesting jobs because they are superior to plain
> humans...until it's discovered that only humans can
> survive the
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:40:08PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > You're joking, right? You CANNOT KNOW THAT THEY ARE DUPLICATES.
They
> > > look like the start of a new message.
> >
> > Only in the case where th
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:40:08PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You're joking, right? You CANNOT KNOW THAT THEY ARE DUPLICATES. They
> > look like the start of a new message.
>
> Only in the case where the first message has no body, ie no message
> header l
> From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on 25/9/02 3:09 am, The Fool at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > it's no wonder very few outside the high end corporate world use
them.
>
> >> There are about 6 million desktop computers running some version of
Unix
>
> > What exactly is your point
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:20:43PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > You ignore the duplicate headers. Is it 100% no. It it a quicky
that
> > I would never actually do? Yes.
>
> You're joking, right? You CANNOT KNOW THAT THEY ARE DUPLICATES. They
> look l
- Original Message -
From: "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "BRIN-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
> on 25/9/02 2:00 am, Dan Minette at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Mes
on 25/9/02 3:09 am, The Fool at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it's no wonder very few outside the high end corporate world use them.
>> There are about 6 million desktop computers running some version of Unix
> What exactly is your point?
--
William T Goodall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wtgab.d
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:20:43PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> You ignore the duplicate headers. Is it 100% no. It it a quicky that
> I would never actually do? Yes.
You're joking, right? You CANNOT KNOW THAT THEY ARE DUPLICATES. They
look like the start of a new message.
> Also you would assum
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:07:18PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > Message size. You don't parse the body of the message, because it is
> > the body of the message. You ignore all duplicate headers.
>
> I think you have a mental block. There is no standa
Kevin Tarr wrote:
>
>*To be fair, Heinlein used the western theme on his barely colonized
>worlds. But I don't think they will have a Diaspora of the magnitude they
>are talking about (is the whole galaxy now occupied by humans?)
>
In none of Heinlein Timelines the galaxy was occupied in 2002.
on 25/9/02 2:00 am, Dan Minette at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 7:46 PM
> Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
>
>>
>> Venn Diagram. AFAIK religi
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:07:18PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> Message size. You don't parse the body of the message, because it is
> the body of the message. You ignore all duplicate headers.
I think you have a mental block. There is no standard size
definition. And the whole point is to disting
"Adam C. Lipscomb" wrote:
>
> Nick-
>
> Any idea on when the "ding" function will be up and running? No
> pressure, I'm just idly wondering.
>
> Adam C. Lipscomb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Gonna ding me some name droppers, for starters *grin*
Hey! I resemble that remark! ;)
Julia
> From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on 24/9/02 6:45 pm, The Fool at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> From: Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> The Fool said:
> >>
> >>> The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
> >>> before 'From', after my sending and
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 08:51:38PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:59:12PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is a perfect example of what my instructors describe happens
> >
on 24/9/02 6:45 pm, The Fool at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> From: Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> The Fool said:
>>
>>> The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
>>> before 'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
>>
>> As far as I know, all mail transfe
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 08:51:38PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:59:12PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> >
> > > This is a perfect example of what my instructors describe happens
> when
> > > people make quick-fix, kludgey, code. It n
Nick-
Any idea on when the "ding" function will be up and running? No
pressure, I'm just idly wondering.
Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gonna ding me some name droppers, for starters *grin*
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:59:12PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > This is a perfect example of what my instructors describe happens
when
> > people make quick-fix, kludgey, code. It never dies. It comes back
> > and bites you in the ass. It gets used fo
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:59:12PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> This is a perfect example of what my instructors describe happens when
> people make quick-fix, kludgey, code. It never dies. It comes back
> and bites you in the ass. It gets used for twenty years. I can come
> up with a better pars
> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I was differentiating, between what I would expect those groups you
> > mentioned would be aginst and what they probably would not be
against.
> > ICBW. Where exactly did I promote 'repression'? I am personally
- Original Message -
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
> I was differentiating, between what I would expect those groups you
> mentioned would be aginst and what
> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > >
> > > > Venn Diagram. AFAIK religious people are the only ones actively
> > opposed
> > > > to the 'occult'.
- Original Message -
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
> > From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > >
> > > Venn D
Statistics:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=664&u=/ap/20020924/ap_to_
po/poverty_13&printer=1
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Venn Diagram. AFAIK religious people are the only ones actively
opposed
> > to the 'occult'.
>
> Actually, I can think of a number of different atheistic groups that
are
> also. Try Marxist and Objectivist
> > of course, that's just my opinion. :)
>
> And you are entitled to it! But it might be wise not to try
> justifying it in public without some better thought out reasons.
Typical. Don't agree with an opinion and call it unjustified.
What do you want, a dissertation on the magnitude of suckage
> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:45:21PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > > From: Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > The Fool said:
> > >
> > > > The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
> > > > before 'From', after my sending and
I think this was more interesting:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
"Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
A joint project of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Harvard,
Stanford, Berkeley, University of San Francisco, and University of Maine
law school clinics.
Do you know your online rights? H
- Original Message -
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
>
> Venn Diagram. AFAIK religious people are the only ones actively opposed
> to the 'occult'.
Actually, I
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:45:21PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > From: Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The Fool said:
> >
> > > The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
> > > before 'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
> >
> > As far as I know, all mai
> From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Fool wrote:
> >
> > > From: Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > > > Behalf Of The Fool
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > > Eh? How is this an attack on free speech? I don't agree
Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>Of the top 10 (and I assume you're looking at the list at
>http://www.parentstv.org ), there are 2 "reality shows", Big Brother 2
> and Temptation Island 2.
>
We have those aberrations here too, local versions, with
brazilian "actors" :-/
Alberto Monteiro
__
"Horn, John" wrote:
>
> Oh man. 0-3. How embarrassing. How awful. How pathetic.
>
> Now, as a transplanted Cowboy fan, I have the dilemna of routing for the
> Cowboys and seeing the Rams fall to 0-4 or route for the Rams and seeing the
> Cowboys go to 1-3.
>
> Hmmm Maybe it's a good th
> > The Fool wrote:
> > >
> > > He implied I was anti-arab. I don't take that from anyone.
> > >
> >
Matt Grimaldi wrote:
>
> > I can see how his post could easily be interpreted that way,
> > especially how he only included the ~50,000 Arab Scientists
>
The Fool wrote:
>
> > From: Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > > Behalf Of The Fool
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > Eh? How is this an attack on free speech? I don't agree with the
> > > tactics,
> > > > but I don't exactly see Fox as a g
> From: Matt Grimaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Fool wrote:
> >
> > He implied I was anti-arab. I don't take that from anyone.
> >
>
> I can see how his post could easily be interpreted that way,
> especially how he only included the ~50,000 Arab Scientists
Oh man. 0-3. How embarrassing. How awful. How pathetic.
Now, as a transplanted Cowboy fan, I have the dilemna of routing for the
Cowboys and seeing the Rams fall to 0-4 or route for the Rams and seeing the
Cowboys go to 1-3.
Hmmm Maybe it's a good thing I won't be at the game...
-
The Fool wrote:
>
> He implied I was anti-arab. I don't take that from anyone.
>
I can see how his post could easily be interpreted that way,
especially how he only included the ~50,000 Arab Scientists
quote in the original post, but you could have pointed out
how you felt wronged while remaini
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
> The show stinks, and I'm tired of people trying to tell me how awful I am for
>acknowledging it.
If it makes you feel any better, the show does nothing for me either.
Marvin Long
Austin, Texas
ROU From Dusk Till Dawn, baby!
__
on 25/9/02 12:13 am, Miller, Jeffrey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>> of course, that's just my opinion. :)
>>
>> And you are entitled to it! But it might be wise not to try
>> justifying it in public without some better thought out reasons.
>
> Typical. Don't agree with an opinion and ca
The Fool wrote:
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Living/reuters20020924_700.html
Wow. So that may give us one more weapon in fighting brain cancer.
1st paragraph for anyone who needs further prodding to read the whole
thing:
PHILADELPHIA (Reuters Health) - A preliminary study in mice has
found
Rob wrote:
> I have no words to describe this crap.
>
> http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=13350
>
> Somebody has a death wish!
If I had a nickel for every true rumor I've seen on AICN, I'd have
enough for a candy bar.
I'll hold back on lining up the mob of angry villagers with pitchfo
The Fool wondered:
> > The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >From this guy:
>
> The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
before
> 'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
Obviously, it was those Amish Black Helicopter Anti-Privacy,
Pro-Microsoft Alien Sex Clone Kidna
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Living/reuters20020924_700.html
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> > of course, that's just my opinion. :)
>
> And you are entitled to it! But it might be wise not to try
> justifying it in public without some better thought out reasons.
Typical. Don't agree with an opinion and call it unjustified.
What do you want, a dissertation on the magnitude of suc
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-959236.html
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
on 24/9/02 5:11 pm, Miller, Jeffrey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ymmv, but its nothing more than a show about pretty people being angsty. Throw
> a cast slightly less attractive into the show with less sexy clothing,
Just a suggestion, but maybe you need to get out more. 'Sexy clothing' ?
> cu
[crossposting between the brin-l and the tolklang lists]
Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>Shall I say that "Frodo" isn't necessarily a constructive suggestion for
>naming a kid in the US? :) (I already have an if Sammy comes home
>saying there's a kid named Frodo in his class who's getting teased.)
>
F
--- The Fool wrote:
> Fascinating article on human / computer processing
> tasks:
>
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/start.html?pg=2
This reminds me of a short story I read (can't
remember the author at the moment - Him?) in which
computers (or maybe it was cyborgs?) get all the
interesti
I have no words to describe this crap.
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=13350
Somebody has a death wish!
xponent
Mindless Drivel Maru
rob
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
The Fool wrote:
>
> > From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > The Fool wrote:
> >
> > > I wasn't suggesting anything involving 'terrorism', I was suggesting
> > > other features of the Taliban rule. How about a different analogy.
> > > Popery in the middle ages (not that medieval popery
> From: Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Fool wrote:
>
> > I wasn't suggesting anything involving 'terrorism', I was suggesting
> > other features of the Taliban rule. How about a different analogy.
> > Popery in the middle ages (not that medieval popery was less violent
than
> > the Ta
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Julia Thompson
...
> > at #3. Unless I am mistaken, csi, is not a drama or fictional,
> but shows
> > professionals in action. Apparently anything that teaches people how to
> > think logically, usi
--- "Miller, Jeffrey" wrote:
> ymmv, but its nothing more than a show about pretty
> people being angsty. Throw a cast slightly less
> attractive into the show with less sexy clothing,
> cut the oh-so-dangerous "lesbian" thing (that's
> there only to attract the panting fan-bois) and
> you'd hav
The Fool wrote:
> I wasn't suggesting anything involving 'terrorism', I was suggesting
> other features of the Taliban rule. How about a different analogy.
> Popery in the middle ages (not that medieval popery was less violent than
> the Taliban (perhaps much more so)). A theocratic 'god' rule.
Man, we keep shakin' things up - first Civil Unions, now this...
-jeffrey-
> -Original Message-
> From: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 01:34 PM
> To: Brin-L
> Subject: Death Penalty Ruled Unconstitutional
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp
- Original Message -
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: how religious fanatics attack free speech
> They put 'crime scene investigation' on their list of top 10 worst shows,
> at #3. Unless I am mistaken, c
> From: Matt Grimaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Fool wrote:
> >
> > Bullshit. Your reply was directed at me and not that
> > other data which I deleted. You wonder why people
> > consider you anti-semitic, when you keep providing
> > examples.
>
> So you feel the need to attack him when he t
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61028-2002Sep24.html
Death Penalty Ruled Unconstitutional
The Associated Press
Tuesday, September 24, 2002; 3:41 PM
MONTPELIER, Vt. A federal judge declared the federal death penalty
unconstitutio
The Fool wrote:
>
> Bullshit. Your reply was directed at me and not that
> other data which I deleted. You wonder why people
> consider you anti-semitic, when you keep providing
> examples.
So you feel the need to attack him when he tries to
correct and restate his position? Why should anyo
> From: J. van Baardwijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 14:39 24-09-2002 -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > > I suddenly get this feeling we are not on the same wavelength here.
I
> > > am not saying that the statement about there being ~50,000
scientists
> > > in the Muslim world is coming from either of t
> From: Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> > Behalf Of The Fool
>
> ...
>
> > > Eh? How is this an attack on free speech? I don't agree with the
> > tactics,
> > > but I don't exactly see Fox as a great defender of free speech,
either.
>
At 14:39 24-09-2002 -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > I suddenly get this feeling we are not on the same wavelength here. I
> > am not saying that the statement about there being ~50,000 scientists
> > in the Muslim world is coming from either of those (non-existant)
> > websites, nor am I saying that t
> From: J. van Baardwijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 12:24 24-09-2002 -0500, The Fool wrote:
>
> > > > There are something like ~50,000 scientists in the entire muslim
> > > > world (an agregate total comprising the total of all scientists
> > > > from the majority of islamic states). How many are
At 12:24 24-09-2002 -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > > There are something like ~50,000 scientists in the entire muslim
> > > world (an agregate total comprising the total of all scientists
> > > from the majority of islamic states). How many are there in the
> > > U.S.? Or Europe?
> > >
> > > I have
The Fool wrote:
>
> > The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >From this guy:
>
> The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">" before
> 'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
I've seen that a lot if there are "too many" lines of nothing between
paragraphs.
I don't kno
Reggie Bautista wrote:
[re: the name Ignatius]
> The name has a grand tradition, at least among Catholics. The two most
> famous saints who have the name are Ignatius of Antioch and Ignatius Loyola.
>
> Ignatius of Antioch was the third Bishop of Antioch, and according to
> tradition, was the
> From: Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Fool said:
>
> > The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
> > before 'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
>
> As far as I know, all mail transfer agents do that so that computers
> using Unix mailboxes don't g
The Fool said:
> The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">"
> before 'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
As far as I know, all mail transfer agents do that so that computers
using Unix mailboxes don't get confused and think that a leading "From"
is a new emai
> The Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From this guy:
The real question is what kind of filtering software inserted ">" before
'From', after my sending and before my recieving.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> From: Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Van: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > There are something like ~50,000 scientists in the entire muslim
world
> > (an agregate total comprising the total of all scientists from the
> > majority of islamic states). How ma
Baardwijk, J. wrote:
>>Van: Alberto Monteiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Aha, so the US is not the only country where you can give your
>>>child pretty much any name you like. Poor kids.
>>>
>>Yes, here in Brazil we can also give any name. I think all
>>democratic countries in the world allow
> From: Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Van: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > There are something like ~50,000 scientists in the entire muslim
world
> > (an agregate total comprising the total of all scientists from the
> > majority of islamic states). How
Marvin wrote:
> >
> > None of these thoughts are set in stone, but it's a set of
> > thoughts that
> > have been gnawing at me over the past year.
>
John replied:
>I am in awe of some of the writing ability on this mailing list. Marvin,
>if
>I could write 1/100 as well as you or contribute 1/100
Julia wrote:
>It's not really anyone else's business until the baby is born, IMO,
>unless the couple is frantically searching for a name, in which case the
>best thing to do is make constructive suggestions. ("Ignatius" is not a
>*constructive* suggestion, but it's a pretty funny one. BTW, one f
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam C. Lipscomb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 05:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Brin-l] [TV] Anyone watch "Firefly"?
>
>
> Jeffrey Miller wrote:
> > Matt Grimaldi wrote:
> > > "Adam C. Lipscomb" wrote:
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 04:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Housing Out of Reach
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:32:13AM +0100, Rik Burke wrote:
>
> > My point, however, I think still stands.
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
