Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg freezing on macOS High Sierra

2019-09-04 Thread pierre zakia via Bug-gnubg
Hi Philippe, Thank you for your prompt reply. Underneath are my answers to some of your ideas you have suggested : - Do you use the tutor mode ? Yes indeed, the issue happens in tutor mode. But gnubg still freezes once tutor mode is deactivated. - Does you older Mac has significantly less memory

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg freezing on macOS High Sierra

2019-09-03 Thread Philippe Michel
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 08:02:46PM +, pierre zakia via Bug-gnubg wrote: > I installed on MacBookAir 2013 gnubg Version GNU Backgammon 1.04.000 >  Oct 28 2014 running on XQuartz 2.7.11 on MacOS Mojave 10.14.6. It is > running without any issue. > On a older MacBookPro 2010, but always in

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg freezing on macOS High Sierra

2019-08-31 Thread pierre zakia via Bug-gnubg
Hi I installed on MacBookAir 2013 gnubg Version GNU Backgammon 1.04.000  Oct 28 2014 running on XQuartz 2.7.11 on MacOS Mojave 10.14.6. It is running without any issue. On a older MacBookPro 2010, but always in use, I  have installed same gnubg Version GNU Backgammon 1.04.000  Oct 28 2014

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG prev game and session list problems

2019-04-15 Thread Philippe Michel
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:29:21AM +0200, Wolf Dieter Wall wrote: > i am running gnubg with -t for the command line and i cannot understand how > list session and prev game work, or how they should work. > > I have two session attached but it seems that > - list session produces no output on

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG prev game and session list problems

2019-04-12 Thread Wolf Dieter Wall
Dear Support, i am running gnubg with -t for the command line and i cannot understand how list session and prev game work, or how they should work. I have two session attached but it seems that - list session produces no output on money sessions - prev game 1 does not work after a game in the

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG windows compilation guide

2019-04-09 Thread Philippe Michel
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Wolf Dieter Wall wrote: > I would like to recompile gnubg on windows. > I read somewhere in the docs that there is a "Nardy Pillard instructions > for compiling gnubg" that contains instructions. > > Unfortunately the link is dead. > > Do you have a

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBg only uses one Core (linux)

2019-04-05 Thread Philippe Michel
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:44:23AM +0200, Philippe wrote: > Hello, > > I have installed GnuBG 1.06.001 Feb 28 2018 from the Ubuntu software center. > > The problem is that it uses only one thread despite the "about" menu > states that multi threading and SSE/SSE2 are enabled. > > Compiling with

[Bug-gnubg] GnuBg only uses one Core (linux)

2019-04-05 Thread Philippe
Hello, I have installed GnuBG 1.06.001 Feb 28 2018 from the Ubuntu software center. The problem is that it uses only one thread despite the "about" menu states that multi threading and SSE/SSE2 are enabled. Compiling with Xubuntu 18.04 the latest 1.06.002 version gives the same result. I read

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG windows compilation guide

2019-04-03 Thread Wolf Dieter Wall
Hi, first of all thank you for your work on GNUBG and for your time. I would like to recompile gnubg on windows. I read somewhere in the docs that there is a "Nardy Pillard instructions for compiling gnubg" that contains instructions. Unfortunately the link is dead. Do you have a copy of the

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score

2019-01-26 Thread Philippe Michel
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:42:10AM +0100, Øystein Schønning-Johansen wrote: > Thanks for your effort Philippe. Your numbers looks correct. > > However, I think it is important to state some more details. > > First: Are the games played to completion? Or are the games terminated at > race or

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score

2019-01-26 Thread Øystein Schønning-Johansen
Thanks for your effort Philippe. Your numbers looks correct. However, I think it is important to state some more details. First: Are the games played to completion? Or are the games terminated at race or bearoff or ... Second: Does the pubeval evaluate all the position classes? I once did the

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score

2019-01-25 Thread Philippe Michel
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:31:08AM -0800, Robert Edgar wrote: > Can anyone confirm the score of a recent version of gnubg vs. pubeval? I > hacked the source and found that gnubg v1.06 averaged +1.1ppg (82% wins) > over 10k games, but a recent paper Papahristou & Refanidis (2017) quotes > +0.60

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score

2019-01-23 Thread Ian Shaw
"set player 1 pubeval", but this option no longer seems to be available. Else I'd repeat the test. * Ian From: Bug-gnubg [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Øystein Schønning-Johansen Sent: 23 January 2019 06:42 To: Robert Edgar Cc: bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subjec

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score

2019-01-22 Thread Øystein Schønning-Johansen
How does the paper report this? Does it take gammon and backgammons into account (ie. cubeless moneygame) or does it just count win/loss ratio (ie. like one-point-match) ? -Øystein On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:05 PM Robert Edgar wrote: > Can anyone confirm the score of a recent version of gnubg

[Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score

2019-01-22 Thread Robert Edgar
Can anyone confirm the score of a recent version of gnubg vs. pubeval? I hacked the source and found that gnubg v1.06 averaged +1.1ppg (82% wins) over 10k games, but a recent paper Papahristou & Refanidis (2017) quotes +0.60 ppg which is only marginally better than TD-Gammon (+0.59). My number

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg and python

2019-01-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Philippe Michel writes: > - package maintainers for Linux distributions. What do you intend to do > for GNUbg ? Does your distribution have general recommendations or > policies about which Python version to use ? For Debian, I haven't moved to Python 3 yet mostly because I haven't had a

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.06.002 released

2018-08-04 Thread Philippe Michel
I have generated a new source tar ball that is available at: http://files.gnubg.org/media/sources/gnubg-release-1.06.002-sources.tar.gz A MS Windows installer can be found here at: http://files.gnubg.org/media/windows/gnubg-1_06_002-20180802-setup.exe This version fixes the crashes that

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg for Windows

2018-06-02 Thread Philippe Michel
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 11:25:23AM -0400, Timothy Y. Chow wrote: > It's been a long time since I've tried to download and install gnubg, but > I just got a new laptop, and I was surprised to find that the website > www.gnubg.org doesn't seem to work any more. Using a link in an old email >

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg for Windows

2018-06-02 Thread Timothy Y. Chow
It's been a long time since I've tried to download and install gnubg, but I just got a new laptop, and I was surprised to find that the website www.gnubg.org doesn't seem to work any more. Using a link in an old email message of Michael Petch's---

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg v1.06 crashes on start up

2018-04-26 Thread boomslang
LS, first of all, thanks for all your contributions to GNU Backgammon. It is still my favorite BG program. The latest version (1.06.001, December 16th, 2017, released for MS Windows) crashes on startup when I use resolution 1920x1200 or 1680x1050. If I use 1440x900 or 800x600 all seems

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG

2018-02-26 Thread Ian Shaw
doubtful about the 2-ply evaluation of World Class. n Ian Shaw From: Bug-gnubg [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of gela devadze Sent: 23 February 2018 22:38 To: bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Hello, I'm learning playing on your proggram GNU

[Bug-gnubg] GnuBG

2018-02-23 Thread gela devadze
Hello, I'm learning playing on your proggram GNU Backgammon. Good job this is Really good proggram for using. I have a question to you: -I am thinking that I am not rightly setting up proggram. -if it is not hard to do for you, please help me to correctly set up this proggram. When

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg as opponent strength tuning

2017-12-29 Thread Philippe Michel
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:10:03PM +0400, gela devadze wrote: > Greetings, I'm learning playing on the GnuBackgammon, I want to test it's > game strength, tell me please how to set up options and parameters to > increase opponents playing strength, want to play with him on maximum > strength,

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.06.001 Released (Binaries for MS Windows available)

2017-12-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Petch writes: > I have generated a new source tar ball that is available here: > http://files.gnubg.org/media/sources/gnubg-release-1.06.001-sources.tar.gz I've uploaded packages of 1.06.001 to Debian unstable, from which they will presumably propagate into

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Marcell Fulop
> Usually it is only slow the first time it is launched. This is right, too. Even if I quit XQuarts, gnubg starts fine subsequently. ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Petch
On 2017-12-22 21:08, Marcell Fulop wrote: > You are actually right. I never gave it long enough time before killed > the seemingly unresponsive gnubg process but after waiting about 2 > mins on a mid-2012 MacbookPro, it just started with XQuartz as it used > to work before. Thanks for trying it

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Marcell Fulop
* I mean it, the dmg installed 1.04 based version. On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Marcell Fulop wrote: > I'll give it a try with macports as you described. > >> it does seem to work on High Sierra as it did on versions 10.10 > > You are actually right. I never gave it

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Marcell Fulop
I'll give it a try with macports as you described. > it does seem to work on High Sierra as it did on versions 10.10 You are actually right. I never gave it long enough time before killed the seemingly unresponsive gnubg process but after waiting about 2 mins on a mid-2012 MacbookPro, it just

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Petch
On 2017-12-22 19:59, Michael Petch wrote: > (which I believe doesn't use quartz > windows manager as a gtk+2 backend (at least by default) I meant to say: (which I believe doesn't use Xquartz windows manager as a gtk+2 backend (at least by default) Xquartz is the x11/quartz back end. Qaurtz

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Petch
On 2017-12-22 17:47, Marcell Fulop wrote: > Did you do that with XCode? Can you share details of the this build please? Reading your response tells me a couple of things that we have done differently. You used Homebrew (which I believe doesn't use quartz windows manager as a gtk+2 backend (at

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-22 Thread Marcell Fulop
Hi Michael, Thanks > I've been able to build GNUBG 1.06.001 (from CVS) on MacOS High Sierra. > I had to coerce it with similar options as Macports uses for the > project. When it was finished and installed it seems to work fine. Did you do that with XCode? Can you share details of the this

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-21 Thread Michael Petch
I've been able to build GNUBG 1.06.001 (from CVS) on MacOS High Sierra. I had to coerce it with similar options as Macports uses for the project. When it was finished and installed it seems to work fine. Some of the X11 artifacts seem to have been fixed as well (including some OpenGL errors). 3D

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-20 Thread Michael Petch
On 2017-12-20 00:44, Marcell Fulop wrote: > Hi Micheal, > > That sounds great, thanks! As you can read here, 1.05.000 compiles > with --with-simd=no and --without-board3d and everything seems to be > in order, analyses bring the exact same results as those generated > with 1.04.000 Mac version

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.06.001 Released (Binaries for MS Windows available)

2017-12-20 Thread Marcell Fulop
Hi Michael, Thanks for all your work with Philippe, this is nice little xmas surprise. Just going through change logs since 1.05.000 release, looks promising. Gameplay on macOS High Sierra is also joyful (w/o 3d). On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michael Petch wrote: >

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-19 Thread Marcell Fulop
Hi Micheal, That sounds great, thanks! As you can read here, 1.05.000 compiles with --with-simd=no and --without-board3d and everything seems to be in order, analyses bring the exact same results as those generated with 1.04.000 Mac version

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-19 Thread Michael Petch
I'm installing High Sierra on one of my older Macs and will see if I can find out what i causing these issues. I don't intend to creat DMGs anymore, but *if* we can find a solution getting fixes in place so it can be installed via Macports would be my preference. This is a big *if*. At this point

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.06.001 Released (Binaries for MS Windows available)

2017-12-18 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy all, I have generated a new source tar ball that is available here: http://files.gnubg.org/media/sources/gnubg-release-1.06.001-sources.tar.gz The MS Windows installer can be found here (and is available from the Download page at www.gnubg.org):

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-10 Thread Marcell Fulop
Hi Philippe, To clarify, I have no background in C and Make and the likes other than being a software engineer and advanced Linux user I built several C programs and resolved many conflicts but these are mostly trial and error based experiments. > You wrote earlier that you built it with gcc 7.

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-10 Thread Philippe Michel
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 06:49:17PM +1100, Marcell Fulop wrote: > Much more interestingly, I found significant differences in match analyses. > I've saved hundreds of those thousands matches played previously along with > analyses. Now, when I open such a match, then open the analysis (Analyse ->

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG ON MACOS HIGH SIERRA

2017-12-10 Thread Marcell Fulop
To add the the compile error, strangely, after "Making all in lib" which is w/o notice or error, it starts "Making all in board3d" and the fist two commands succeed the second throwing a bunch of deprecated warnings (related to deprecated glu* functions). These produce

[Bug-gnubg] Gnubg on MacOS High Sierra

2017-12-09 Thread Marcell Fulop
I've had OS X version of Gnubg installed on El Capitan for a long time. This was the Gnubg.app which ran under XQuartz and, according to http://gnubg.org/index.php?itemid=22, it is based on version 1.04.000. As mentioned in an earlier thread (

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG ON MACOS HIGH SIERRA

2017-12-09 Thread Marcell Fulop
Hi Philippe, Thanks for the input. It seems you are right regarding the glew Homebrew package. When installed and GLU_LIBS and GLU_CFLAGS are set, configure says "checking for GLU... yes" and succeeds with --with-board3d. Trying with the OpenGL shipped with macOS High Siearra

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG ON MACOS HIGH SIERRA

2017-12-08 Thread Philippe Michel
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:13:00PM +1100, Marcell Fulop wrote: > I could only build w/o board3d, it gave me a weird error message about not > finding GTK when configuring with --with-board3d, but w/o it, it just > builds with GTK fine. Any clues to this one? > > $ ./configure --with-board3d >

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG ON MACOS HIGH SIERRA

2017-12-08 Thread Marcell Fulop
Hi, I recently updated my Mac from High Sierra (straight from El Capitan, where Gnubg ran OK). After upgrade Gnubg didn't run in XQuartz as before. However, after purging brew and reinstalling all required packages, setting CC (to gcc-7), LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS with includes and libs from the

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG ON MACOS HIGH SIERRA

2017-11-29 Thread Nicolás Santiñaque
Hi, I try to run GNUBG on MACOS HIGH SIERRA, anytihing I try let me play, I install xquartz but nothing. Can you help me? Thanks Nicolas -- Nicolas Santiñaque +549 11 3597 1855 Buenos Aires, Argentina santinaque.tumblr.com ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem

2017-11-13 Thread Jim Segrave
Start gnubg. Go to Settings->Options->Display Set number of digits in output to  or less. There was an error in earlier versions of gnubg which created buffers for building ouput that only supported a smaller number of digits. Later versions have, I believe, bumped the minimum size to handle

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem

2017-11-12 Thread Chris Fahning
I don't know how many digits before the dot the MWC plans to produce because the crash occurs right away. Peculiar it is showing up in my v. 1.05.001. Guess there is nothing for me right now then? Support had to tell me about v. 1.05.001. The one common on the internet site is v. 1.05.000.

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem

2017-11-12 Thread Philippe Michel
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 03:09:42PM -0600, Chris Fahning wrote: > perform the following steps anytime during a game after you've rolled the > dice: > HINT ICON > MWC BUTTON > > i run 1.05.001, [...] on windows 10 There used to be a problem that could cause such crashes when displaying numbers

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem

2017-11-10 Thread Chris Fahning
it’s a problem specific to your build. > > > > Regards, > > Ian Shaw > > > > *From:* Bug-gnubg [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw= > riverauto.co...@gnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris Fahning > *Sent:* 09 November 2017 22:22 > *To:* bug-gnubg@gnu.org > *Subj

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem

2017-11-10 Thread Ian Shaw
-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem Game crashes if MWC is selected inside the hint box. Is there a Fix for this? ty -Chris ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg Problem

2017-11-09 Thread Chris Fahning
Game crashes if MWC is selected inside the hint box. Is there a Fix for this? ty -Chris ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg crashes with Analyse - Distribution of Rolls

2017-05-31 Thread Philippe Michel
On Mon, 29 May 2017, motiv4u wrote: I noticed the "Fix memory leaks" in the CVS-repository http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/gnubg/gnubg/?sortby=date#dirlist looking at the Diffs, since the ChangeLog wasn't that clear for me. These are unrelated to your issue. I used a feature from recent

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg crashes with Analyse - Distribution of Rolls

2017-05-29 Thread motiv4u
> > >> [snap] I don't know why looking at rolls up to such a depth would be useful. To >> analyse market losing sequences, depth 2 seems enough (and then evaluate >> the leaf nodes at 0, 1, or 2 ply, but build a list of only 21^2 rolls >> sequences, not 21^5...). >> > > For now, a simple way to

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg crashes with Analyse - Distribution of Rolls

2017-05-14 Thread Philippe Michel
On Fri, 12 May 2017, motiv4u wrote: Start with a position (I think it can be just any position) GNUbg ID: bM7gASiYZ8oBMA:cAngAAAE Now do: Analyse - Distribution of rolls Change Depth from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5 (takes 10 minutes on i7 3th gen) With GNUbg build on Windows 10 (msys2) from

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg crashes with Analyse - Distribution of Rolls

2017-05-12 Thread motiv4u
Start with a position (I think it can be just any position) GNUbg ID: bM7gASiYZ8oBMA:cAngAAAE Now do: Analyse - Distribution of rolls Change Depth from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5 (takes 10 minutes on i7 3th gen) With GNUbg build on Windows 10 (msys2) from CVS, May 7th, 2017 continue playing:

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Offered Odd Backgammon Resignation.

2017-05-02 Thread Ian Shaw
contest. It only makes sense to look at overall score in money (unlimited) games. I hope this helps. -- Ian -Original Message- From: Ralph Corderoy [mailto:ra...@inputplus.co.uk] Sent: 29 April 2017 19:32 To: Ian Shaw <ian.s...@riverauto.co.uk> Cc: bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Offered Odd Backgammon Resignation.

2017-04-29 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Ian, > I'm guessing that it's something to do with the match score that > affected how gnubg offers a resignation. For example, maybe 2 points > was enough for you to win the match anyway, so it didn't matter > whether gnubg conceded 2 or 3. I think you're right, but that it is wrong for

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Offered Odd Backgammon Resignation.

2017-04-25 Thread Ian Shaw
the match anyway, so it didn't matter whether gnubg conceded 2 or 3. Regards, Ian Shaw -Original Message- From: Bug-gnubg [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Corderoy Sent: 24 April 2017 17:16 To: bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg Offered

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg Offered Odd Backgammon Resignation.

2017-04-25 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, gnubg 1.05.002-2 on Arch Linux. Near the end of a game, gnubg offered to "3" resign. I thought this was odd because it was possible, depending on the rolls, that the best result I could definitely achieve was a gammon. And so it proved. I have the 88,928-byte SGF file, if it would be

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG Won't Run On Mac OSX Mountain Lion

2017-02-27 Thread Ken Kline
Hi, I got the correct version of GNUBG for Mountain Lion, 64bit (gnubg-1_03_) from your site but after installing in my Apps folder, I try running it but only XQuartz comes it, GNUBG won't run. How can I fix this? I am not much of a computer techie so please make your reply simple to

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg mac bug

2017-01-22 Thread Michael Petch
On 2017-01-22 19:20, Richard Gorton wrote: > It seems to work fine but occasionally the game freezes. None of the buttons > respond and I cannot restart/quit gnubg from its menu. I have to abort the > game and quit Xquartz and start again. > > Is there any fix or way to restart it, or

[Bug-gnubg] Gnubg mac bug

2017-01-22 Thread Richard Gorton
Hi, I recently installed Gnubg on my mac running osx 10.12.2 I installed Xquartz 2.7.11 (xorg-server 1.18.4) I launch Xquartz first, then Gnubg from the applications folder. It seems to work fine but occasionally the game freezes. None of the buttons respond and I cannot restart/quit gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg Mac problems

2016-09-05 Thread Philippe Michel
Here again, the issues are not specific to Macs. I somehow lost the analysis window. Now there’s just white area to the right and below the board (see attachment). The View / Panels menu allows you to choose which panels are displayed. Maybe you accidentally unselected Analysis. How do

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg Mac problems

2016-09-05 Thread Philippe Michel
The ‘New game’ menu isn’t the same as shown in the manuals. I don’t have the choice for a Match or Money game. I have the quick start shortcut buttons but not the menu choices (see attachment). How is a money game played against Gnu? How is the value set? This issue is not specific to

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg website down?

2016-07-20 Thread motiv4u
Gnubg.org and gnubg.com OK. N. On 20 Jul 2016 21:42, "Michael Petch" wrote: > On 2016-07-17 2:37 PM, Superfly Jon wrote: > > I'm getting a proxy error... > > > > Jon > > > > My bad, there was an IP address change. Can you try it again? > >

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg website down?

2016-07-20 Thread Michael Petch
On 2016-07-17 2:37 PM, Superfly Jon wrote: > I'm getting a proxy error... > > Jon > My bad, there was an IP address change. Can you try it again? ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg website down?

2016-07-17 Thread Superfly Jon
I'm getting a proxy error... Jon ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg-1_05_000 flagged as threat

2016-06-08 Thread Michael Petch
Nothing is up. The "Reputation" threat isn't actually a virus threat. It is because our product has a niche market and doesn't get thousands of downloads. No virus is present. If you go to a site like virustotal.com you'll discover that Norton is the only one that will flag it. It is safe.

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg-1_05_000 flagged as threat

2016-06-08 Thread Jerry Harr
Dear Sirs: I downloaded gnubg-1_05 today, and Norton flagged it as a threat and took it off my machine. I have been using gnubg for years, and it is a wonderful program. But I just downloaded the latest ver for a friend, and Norton squawked. What's up? Here's what Norton says:

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg on osx 10.11

2015-11-28 Thread Schneider Felix
Hello I’m trying to install gnubg (I tryed all available compiled versions) on osx 10.11.1 but it does not work (X11 is already installed and runs smoothly) Who could give me a hint? Thanks Felix ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg on osx 10.11

2015-11-28 Thread Michael Petch
On 2015-11-28 4:57, Schneider Felix wrote: > Hello > I’m trying to install gnubg (I tryed all available compiled versions) on osx > 10.11.1 but it does not work (X11 is already installed and runs smoothly) > > Who could give me a hint? > Although you said you tried all of them this is the one

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05 and compatibility with Windows XP SP3

2015-07-25 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy, I have updated all the components GNUbg uses to resolve an issue that prevented 1.05.000 from running properly on Windows XP. I have built a new version of 1.05.000 that should install and run on Windows XP (And probably Windows 2000SP4). The revised release can be downloaded directly from

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Petch mpe...@gnubg.org writes: The new 1.05.000 version of GNUbg has an optional (but highly used feature) that requires a new dependency. We have used random.org as a source of input to GNUbg. This broke at the beginning of the year when that site went to HTTPS over HTTP. In order

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Michael Petch
On 2015-04-26 8:25 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: libcurl3 development packages no longer exist in Debian because we're trying to get rid of that library. What fails with libcurl4? Can I maybe help with porting this? I'm trying a build right now. I may have been wrong but I thought it failed to

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Petch mpe...@gnubg.org writes: On 2015-04-26 8:25 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: libcurl3 development packages no longer exist in Debian because we're trying to get rid of that library. What fails with libcurl4? Can I maybe help with porting this? I'm trying a build right now. I may

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-26 Thread Michael Petch
On 2015-04-26 9:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: It ended up building fine with libcurl4-openssl-dev in Debian unstable, and I tested it with random.org and that wroked fine as well, so I went ahead and uploaded that. Thanks for the new release! Thanks for the heads-up. I wanted to be more

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 Released (Binaries for MS Windows available)

2015-04-21 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy all, I was busier on the weekend than I anticipated so wasn't able to tag the code until yesterday. I have generated a new source tar ball that is available here: http://files.gnubg.org/media/sources/gnubg-release-1.05.000-sources.tar.gz The MS Windows installer can be found here (and is

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.05.000 and dependencies for downstream maintainers

2015-04-21 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy, The new 1.05.000 version of GNUbg has an optional (but highly used feature) that requires a new dependency. We have used random.org as a source of input to GNUbg. This broke at the beginning of the year when that site went to HTTPS over HTTP. In order to support this feature going forward

[Bug-gnubg] Gnubg

2014-10-20 Thread philip
Gnubg will not open with Mac OS 10.10 Yosemite ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg compilation problem: flex

2014-08-31 Thread Joseph Heled
Hi, I upgraded to a 64 bit kubuntu mint 17, and make fails rather strangely. Anyone knows what is going on? make /bin/bash ./ylwrap sgf_y.y y.tab.c sgf_y.c y.tab.h `echo sgf_y.c | sed -e s/cc$/hh/ -e s/cpp$/hpp/ -e s/cxx$/hxx/ -e s/c++$/h++/ -e s/c$/h/` y.output sgf_y.output -- yacc -d

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg compilation problem: flex

2014-08-31 Thread Michael Petch
On 2014-08-31 12:48 AM, Joseph Heled wrote: Hi, I upgraded to a 64 bit kubuntu mint 17, and make fails rather strangely. Anyone knows what is going on? make /bin/bash ./ylwrap sgf_y.y y.tab.c sgf_y.c y.tab.h `echo sgf_y.c | sed -e s/cc$/hh/ -e s/cpp$/hpp/ -e s/cxx$/hxx/ -e s/c++$/h++/

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.03.001 source release / Python3 / Question of minimum Python support

2014-08-17 Thread Philippe Michel
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, Michael Petch wrote: At present we support Python back to about 2.3 (That I have tested). It may work on 2.2 but I haven't tried. Pyhon2.2 is currently our minimum version supported. My question is whether we wish to continue using 2.2 as the minimum going forward. I am

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.03.001 source release / Python3 / Question of minimum Python support

2014-08-09 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy All, I have tagged 1.03.001 in CVS (revision control). This is an official release of the sources however I won't be building binaries from it unless it is requested. This release caters to those environments/distros that may wish to start catering to Python 3. Python3 is now supported at

[Bug-gnubg] GNUbg 1.03.000 released

2014-08-04 Thread Michael Petch
I have officially tagged CVS with release-1_03_000 . 1.03.000 is effectively a large bug fix update of 1.02.000. There aren't substantial core changes between the two releases. One can review the ChangeLog for the changes since the previous release at

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG Release 1.03.000 next Sunday Aug 3rd.

2014-07-29 Thread Philippe Michel
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Michael Petch wrote: I will be building the next release of GNUbg (1.03.000) next Sunday evening. So any changes that one may have should be put in as soon as possible so testing can occur. Besides code changes, updates to the documentation and translations would come

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG Release 1.03.000 next Sunday Aug 3rd.

2014-07-26 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy All, I will be building the next release of GNUbg (1.03.000) next Sunday evening. So any changes that one may have should be put in as soon as possible so testing can occur. I will be completing a request made by Philippe regarding some stats about different settings Sunday/Monday. There

[Bug-gnubg] GnuBG on Mac

2014-04-30 Thread Dorcas Greig-Dunn
Hi there I've installed XQuartz and then GNUBG for a Mac running OS X 10.6.8 but nothing happens when I click on the icon in the Applications folder. Suggestions please! Kind regards, Dee ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg builds fine with llvm/clang

2014-02-27 Thread Eli Dayan
Hello All, I have tried to build gnubg with clang here on FreeBSD 10, and it seems to work just fine. Just thought I'd share that gcc is not necessarily needed. Eli Dayan ___ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG / GNU Coding Standards - C and or C++ - feedback wanted

2014-02-14 Thread Taper_Mike
To date, I have not been a coder in the GnuBg project, so you should take my input with a grain of salt. Having said that, I must also confess that the one time I looked through some of the GnuBg source code, I was shocked to see that it was coded in C instead of C++. While it is true

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG / GNU Coding Standards - C and or C++ - feedback wanted

2014-02-14 Thread Øystein Schønning-Johansen
I'm not sure this comment actually means that we should prefer a programming language over an other. As Steve McConnell says in Code Complete 2: Program into your language. Not in it! By this he mean abstraction to data types. What the GNU Backgammon code is missing is real abstraction of

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG / GNU Coding Standards - C and or C++ - feedback wanted

2014-02-14 Thread Øystein Schønning-Johansen
Let me make up the same program snippet with C++ syntax: Board board = Board(); Evaluator* eval = new gnubg(); Dice roll = Dice( 3, 1); Move best = eval-find_best_move( board, roll ); std::cout Best move is: best; // I just made up this code based on the abstractions I listed in the

[Bug-gnubg] GNUBG / GNU Coding Standards - C and or C++ - feedback wanted

2014-02-13 Thread Michael Petch
Howdy All, Last July Richard Stallman made one significant change to the GNU Coding Standard so that it no longer prefer C to other such languages. This was a significant departure from the original coding standard which preferred C over other languages, and chided C++ in particular. The latest

Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNUBG / GNU Coding Standards - C and or C++ - feedback wanted

2014-02-13 Thread Øystein Schønning-Johansen
Hi! I must admit that I'm not a big fan of C++ but at least it does not make me sick (like Perl does). I usually have problems seeing what you can gain from using C++ over C? + you get better abstraction with C++. + you get templates which may simplify some things. + you get operator

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg freezes when a specific move is clicked

2014-01-28 Thread Fred Bloggs
When I analyze a game, and then click on a particular move in the analysis panel, the program locks up and can only be terminated by closing the window using the keyboard (Alt-F4) to abort the program. Ubuntu Linux 12.04LTS Sincerely, Rohan Bayer-Fox

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg freezes when a specific move is clicked

2014-01-28 Thread Michael Petch
On 2014-01-27 20:34, Fred Bloggs wrote: Ubuntu Linux 12.04LTS Yes this is a known problem, and one that has been resolved for quite some time. The problem is that versions of Ubuntu prior to 12.10 (I believe) use an older version of GNUBG that actually predates the fix. This GNUBG bug report

[Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode - how to choose bear off direction / tray

2013-04-05 Thread sebalotek
Hi, Please can anyone help? Please see attached screenshot.. I'm red and I'm trying to work out how to choose to bear off my checkers in the *bottom right tray* but I can't seem to find a way. Edit mode seems to only allow me to bear off at the top left or right? The gnubg id is Position

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode - how to choose bear off direction / tray

2013-04-05 Thread Ian Shaw
, then click in this tray to set the chequers there. Cheers, Ian -Original Message- From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of sebalotek Sent: 05 April 2013 08:25 To: Bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: [Bug-gnubg

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode - how to choose bear off direction / tray

2013-04-05 Thread sebalotek
to play and my opponent (Bob) holds the cube at 2 Thanks again! -Original Message- From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of sebalotek Sent: 05 April 2013 08:25 To: Bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: [Bug

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode - how to choose bear off direction / tray

2013-04-05 Thread Ian Shaw
manual dice). -- Ian -Original Message- From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of sebalotek Sent: 05 April 2013 12:16 To: Bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode - how to choose

Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode - how to choose bear off direction / tray

2013-04-05 Thread sebalotek
have chosen manual dice). -- Ian -Original Message- From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org [mailto:bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of sebalotek Sent: 05 April 2013 12:16 To: Bug-gnubg@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] gnubg - edit mode

  1   2   3   >