Hello David,
I think this might help you accomplish your goal:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.0/english/install/guide/install_phones.html#wp1056189
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tamer,
I
David,
Is the Service Category * setup as Java MIDLet or XML Service?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:26 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Roger,
I followed the document. When I test the url
http://x.x.x.x/midlets/VisualVoicemail/VisualVoicemail.jad
with my
Hello,
Do you have more details about this issue? It wouldn´t hurt if you add some
sdi traces to your problem description. Can you see CUCM looking for CFB
resources in the Default List?
Regards.
Roger Carpio.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
assigned to the IP phones line CSS.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html#wp1150997
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi Experts,
while practicing volume 1 lab 5.9: block 91900? pattern for all
Hello ShinGei,
Thanks for the info. In the end, MGCP will not make it for us [?]
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:34 AM, ShinGei Yong shingei.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roger,
MVA on a MGCP control gateway is possible.In fact,that is a coexisting of
both
MGCP and H323
?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Experts,
*Wish you all a Happy and Prosperous New Year 2011*
First question this year :-)
HQ Site is MGCP.
When I call HQ Phone 5002 , HQ PSTN is ringing -- all is good.
I have configured MVA
Hello Deepak,
Have you ran the debug isdn q921 on this GW? If so; do you see messages
going back and forth between the RTR and the PSTN?
Could you please attach the configuration of T1 controller 0/0/0 as well?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Deepak sidana sidana_dee
Michael,
You do not need to add the GW to CUCM; otherwise this will not be scalable
at all. I had the same confusion but then I got it to work without adding my
GW (CME) to CUCM.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:
I was trying
. In regards to the CSS;
you use the Trunk's CSS for incoming calls.
If you wish I can take some traces from my lab and share them with you for
further analysis.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roger,
I was hoping the same as you. But I
Hello,
What does this have to do with the CCIE Lab preparation? I bet you'll get a
lot of answers if you google it.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:44 AM, haroon javed harooon.ja...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anyone know of any preferably software that will allow you to mange
Hello,
You're following the configuration example of a T1 CAS while you're
configuring a T1 PRI.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:27 PM, linuxboss.9 linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we need to add ccm-manager mgcpapp under incoming dial-peer of MGCP
http://www.cisco.com/en
Open a case with Cisco TAC please for further investigation, this is a CCIE
study list.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a customer where RisDC service is using some 350MB Virtual memory
but it increments
I have seen the same exact issue, other times the same configuration works
just fine. I have never collected logs when the issue happened to me though.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've configured softphone
10.2.3.0 mask 255.255.0.0
codec g711ulaw
voice register pool 2
id network 10.2.3.0 mask 255.255.0.0
codec g711ulaw
Have you tried this?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Shrini linuxbos...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you try using telephony-service instead of call-manager
7.1.5 is not the version running in the CCIE Lab. Open a TAC case for
further research.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Tatiana Oliveira tati_olivei...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I´m receiving High Traffic Try Again Later on Cisco 7965 Phones and I´m
using the 7.1.5.1-12. Do you have any idea
I use a cheap 831, IP phones with power bricks setup as daisy chain and it
has worked just fine so far.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Experts,
i need assisitance on what device will be the most economical and most
/callingfeatures_rt.html#wp1027556
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:41 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm hoping i missed something simple.
I just got a 9971 registered on a CUCM 7.x server.
it works great but I noticed there are no available softkeys for hold,
park , etc during a call.
It's
hope it
helps.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone has seen this before.
There is a requirement to show in Missed/Received directory numbers in E164
format, but in alerting/connected state
How many sites are supposed to use this RP? If only one site is meant to use
it; SLRG will have an extra step (assigning the RG to the DP).
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.comwrote:
If i have a requirement to only use local gateway
Pablo,
I'll see you there :-)
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I am just wondering how will attend to April 19th's One Week Lab Experience
boot camp in San Jose for CCIE Voice?
Regards.
-Pablo Meneses
I think Pablo got confused; title and message body don't match... I'll see
you there on April 11th
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney)
stden...@cisco.comwrote:
I’ll be there as well (assuming you meant April 11th and not 19th) :)
cheers, sd
Jonny.
I know how can you pass this exam. Stop wasting your time and ours looking
for a way to cheat and get to study.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Jonny Mendas jonny.men...@hotmail.comwrote:
ok sry justin if u feel thats ok.. i think i got more tensed bec of 3
it.
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence,_Release_7.x_--_Deployment_of_Cisco_Unified_Presence
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:47 AM, lee huntl huntc...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I am having trouble to get the Cisco Presence server to work. I was told I
need
Auto register it to CUCM.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All
I converted my 7961 phone to SIP Load for a Lab but am not able to revert
the Phone to SCCP Load. For changing any network settings on the phone, like
TFTP etc, the phone prompts for
Before adding the user to UC; did you configure the Allow Users to Access
Voice Mail Using an IMAP Client option in COS?
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Erwan Erwan e_er...@yahoo.com wrote:
hi all,
can someone advice, what i miss in CUPS voicemail.
I kept geeting this error from Show
CCM service Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720;
just type the trunk name.
Rgs,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720?
Thanks,
Randall
HQ-RTR(config)#do show
That should do it. If they do not show the requested port after adding the
trunk name to the service parameter I would try resetting the trunk;
resetting CCM service, gatekeeper shut/no shut etc.
Rgs,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks
Look at the folder's name in flash memory where GUI files are stored. It
must match what you defined under ip http path flash:/GUI and btw is case
sensitive :-P
Rgs,
Roger Carpio.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote:
HI,
Here is a dumb question, but causing
If you're not been provided with a value to Site C; then 1544 is acceptable.
That's the one I use.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:23 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have a question as it pertains to the test. If I use auto qos on the
Serial interfaces of the HQ and SiteB routers,
however the CCIE does not care about scalability, just functionality. Get
used to both approaches; old school and the one introduced in CUCM 7; then
you should be able to come with an action plan when your sitting in the lab.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, adam compton com
John,
No debugs in CUCM for DHCP but you still have the Cisco DHCP Monitor Service
Traces and packet capture.
There is no way to bind the MAC of a device to an IP address as far as I can
tell; there is no option in GUI to accomplish this.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:45 AM
That's your SRST reference.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Greg cnn...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have only SCCP phones, do I still need to configure SRST reference in
CUCM?
I thought I could just specify the default router as SRST in device pool.
Was that correct?
Thanks!
Greg
with based on whatever you want to accomplish.
On the CCIE test you'll be provided with the requirements on that port; if
any.
Saludos,
Roger Carpio.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote:
Hello All,
What QOS most to be configured at port F0/0
The map-class is the workaround and as far as I know the bandwidth command
wont work.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think if you set the bandwidth to greater than 768 you will not have this
applied to the interface for BR2
On Tue
How is this related to the CCIE Lab preparation? I bet there is a sql query
to retrieve that information but I don't see how can this help us in the
lab.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote:
Hello all
** **
Canyone tell
at the back of the IP phone and make sure
you are adding the correct phone model in CUCM. An App log will easily show
you this mismatch if that were the case.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Santiago Figueroa
sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote:
Hello I have a doubt what is reason
Hello,
I am not sure I am following you, so the call uses a SIP trunk from CUCM to
?? Then there is an MGCP call? Where do we loose the E164 number?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:19 AM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote:
hi ,
how do we make call using SIP trunk, so
Not sure if this will help but have you deleted the profile 1, make sure the
file is gone and then configure it again?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Marco zurdo zurdosp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mailers i have a trouble creating the SIP profile for pool 1 i changed
If the previous candidate using your lab spot changed the protocol as
requested, let's say his lab had SIP and now yours is SCCP; there is nothing
you can do to avoid this. It is not necessarily a waste of time; unless you
keep staring at the phones LOL
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Jun 21
requests JTAPI integration but fear not; if you have to do the conversion;
all you need is to know how to do it; files will be provided... Easy as pie.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:25 PM, CCIE Voice ccvoic...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you say that Lab will not be restored to a pre
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=UCCX+OS
I would suggest you to use google first and if you can't find it anywhere
then let us know...
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:41 PM, shelesh shel...@hotmail.com wrote:
I need help to get Cisco Contact center express 7 virtual machine so I can
is pretty much the
same. Once you understand how this works; you won't ever have to ask this
question.
There are other good documents at cisco.com with much more information than
this; I'll recommend you to take a look at them if you still have additional
questions.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Thu, Jun 23
I agree with Randall, if you hit # the call will match 9011!# right away, no
need to use urgent priority.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:
Still. I just tried it on my lab with patterns:
9011!
9011!#
And 9011# routed immediately without using urgent
Well you might want to check what happened to that interface. Run the show
traffic-shape; if it looks fine to you, then leave it like that :)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/command/reference/qrfcmd11.html#wp1019473
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Cristobal
Excellent George!!! Shall we celebrate with a Bacon Maple Sundae?
Congratulations :-)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of technical problem you faced and managed to get a voucher?
My router rebooted halfway due to traceback consider technical
That shouldn't be a problem... Device Pool has nothing to do with daisy
chain unless you're testing device mobility. In that situation it all
depends if the switchports support dot1q so that PC port and Switch port
reside on different VLANs.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Pithog Oil
to activate it.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Michael Dietrich mdd2...@gmail.com wrote:
Installing on ESXi
I have installed base MS Server 2003 from Cisco IPT OS Disk
Win SVr 2003 Teleco Svr App SW 3.0 1-4 CPU
Product Key : QW438-46P6G-MHXTB-99XGG-XX7CG
using as base
Are you able to type the card type e1 command?
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Rafay Aslam rafayc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have my CCIE Voice lab @ home, last night when I booted my router, my E1
controller card did not show up in my Br2 Configuration, nor I can see
will
be happy to provide you with the document you need to read.
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Randall,
Thanks for reply, however it would be nice if you use some kind words.
this is a sharing info and knowledge exchange forum /group
Dear Deepak,
If the following link does not help you, try posting your question at
Cisco's support community. This is the wrong place.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmespeed.html#wp1044566
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:39 PM
/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_m1ht.html#wp1029669
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote:
Dears,
I repeated the scenario and used the command voicemail mailbox-selection
original-called on CUE, but still CUE running the 4002 vm
John,
I can't find the plus sign as a valid character; what if you just use * as a
wildcard?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmcfg/b03sdial.html#wp1052731
Regards,
Roger Carpio.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug)
jomcg...@cisco.com wrote
Today's moral after reading this message.. Lab + # in subject = just a waste
of time or aka troll. Please do not use the study list to share this
information; you're just not doing any good by letting us know how big the
test was or how complex you believe it is. I already know how big and
complex
Don't you worry boys... I know if we behave Santa Claus will program it for
us... LOL
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.comwrote:
the release still coming over in the few next weeks,the release notes for
that version is not yet published .
Ash
On Mon, Aug
54 matches
Mail list logo
