On Wed 20/Aug/2014 03:38:32 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Xepher writes:
I've attached a patch (spf-recursive.patch) which, I believe,
properly resolves the issue. However, as the current SPF tests
provided with courier (./testspf -test=1) do not work (the DNS
records used are no longer
On Fri 08/Aug/2014 01:29:39 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[rise in UTF-8 interest...]
This is a big nothing-burger.
For starters, the only thing that's needed to add SMTPUTF8 support to an
SMTP server is to advertise the SMTPUTF8 extension. Done.
All that means is that the mail server
Sam,
let me forward this message, as it captures what looks like a sudden
rise in UTF-8 interest...
Ale
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Postfix SMTPUTF8 support (unicode email addresses)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:46:04 +0200
From: Sebastian Wiesinger postfix-us...@ml.karotte.org
On Fri 30/May/2014 00:46:18 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Lindsay Haisley writes:
The author and the sender of a message are distinct
entities, and it seems that they often get confused in
discussions of DMARC. 2822 (3.6.2): [...]
But as far as sender validation goes, MAIL FROM: is what
On Sun 25/May/2014 23:51:46 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 11:24 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
An alternative solution is to replace:
From: John Doe j...@yahoo.com
with:
From: List l...@example.com, John Doe j...@yahoo.com.INVALID
The Mailman list server
On Sun 25/May/2014 02:55:45 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Lindsay Haisley writes:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 09:00 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
kb2...@kb2ear.net writes:
With the recent DMARC implementation from AOL and Yahoo I
have a very broken mailing list. Is there any way using MLM
to
Care was taken to avoid incompatibility issues in RFC 7208.
Changes in Implementation Requirements from RFC 4408 are given in:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#appendix-B
I only quote the first bullet:
o Use of DNS RR type SPF (99) has been removed from the protocol;
see [RFC6686]
On Fri 04/Apr/2014 15:15:19 +0200 Lisa Muir wrote:
Bowie's heads up on the courierd logging helps me concentrate my search,
I'm getting dns name of the host that sent the message there instead of
the auth string.
Apr 4 07:03:10 mail courierd: newmsg,id=01884042.533E4B1D.1080: dns;
On Wed 26/Mar/2014 11:38:59 +0100 Raphael Bauduin wrote:
earlier this week we had this message appearing in the logs, preventing
anyone to access their mails.
imapd-ssl: gdbm fatal: couldn't init cache
I've seen this error today for users still accessing their mails, so it
might not
On Wed 12/Mar/2014 16:29:52 +0100 Lorenzo Perone wrote:
The problem I would like to solve is (if there is another way, I'll go
for it): Sometimes user passwords get guessed / lost, and spammers will
use that account, authenticate as it, and 'relay' mails around. I'd like
to be able to log
On Tue 25/Feb/2014 02:54:15 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Mark Constable writes:
The issue of how to rate limit outgoing mail is still bugging
us here and it looks like I have no choice (short of using
postfix) but to dig in to the courier filter system and come up
with some kind of
On Fri 07/Feb/2014 08:04:37 +0100 Daniel Müller wrote:
This is a bug in your Iphone OS. In our environment it was working with the
older IOS without any error.
With the new IOS it stopped working after a while. The only thing to do is,
delete the account, set it up anew and it is working
On Fri 07/Feb/2014 14:39:11 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Fri 07/Feb/2014 08:04:37 +0100 Daniel Müller wrote:
With the new IOS it stopped working after a while. The only thing to do is,
delete the account, set it up anew and it is working (for a while).
Alessandro Vesely writes:
I
On Tue 14/Jan/2014 19:10:04 +0100 Ryta Kashemire wrote:
Hi All
am running courier on my inbound server and have noticed from the
mail.warn logs that some emails are not being delivered and the error
message is as bellow
--
Jan 14 17:14:31 pop courieresmtpd:
The software taxonomy and statistics hosted by the AlternativeTo web
site seem to be quite skewed. At any rate, I added a couple of
Courier packages, since they were missing.
If anyone wants to comment or vote (requires some auth):
http://alternativeto.net/software/courier-imap/
On Fri 13/Sep/2013 14:19:41 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php
New builds of courier and courier-authlib packages. The courier
package requires the new build of courier-authlib to be installed first.
Changes:
• Include userid of failed SASL
On Thu 12/Sep/2013 06:25:37 +0200 Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 09/10/2013 11:44 PM, Mark Constable wrote:
A crazy thought on this issue... what if couriersmtp and friends were run
at the very lowest cpu and i/o priority possible, would that tend to
naturally rate limit courier in general?
Not
On Thu 05/Sep/2013 04:12:14 +0200 Mark Constable wrote:
Most of my other courier based servers do not have either python or perl
installed (rpi, nas and small 128mb vps's) so would it be possible to do
some shell scripted (or PHP) rate limiting for local filters?
Hm... Wouldn't you use a DB
On Wed 04/Sep/2013 16:01:40 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
... I wonder why your mails contain 2 pages of empty lines below your text
and over the ads.
Those taglines push the ads below the fold. Cleaner, no?
--
On Tue 03/Sep/2013 17:58:33 +0200 Jeff Potter wrote:
Does anyone know how to block a local user from being able to send
email through the command line, while otherwise allowing other
users to continue with local submission? (I.e. I'd like to block
all email from user id 1043, let's say).
On Thu 29/Aug/2013 23:06:46 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
The only thing I have in place which is close to this is for mailing
lists which FMP hosts. If an AOL or Earthlink customer hits Report
spam (or whatever the button is called) on their proprietary mail
readers, then I, personally, get
On Tue 03/Sep/2013 17:41:41 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 23.08.13 14:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The spec was buggy on what type servers should look up, and querying
both --which is what Courier does-- is a waste of resources. Skipping
an unnecessary query seems to be rather
to bring fresher perspectives.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
On Mon 26/Aug/2013 10:00:52 +0200 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
It is also quite sensible that e-mail is handled as close to the point of
origin as possible.
According to what topology?
The ISP
On Mon 26/Aug/2013 10:00:52 +0200 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
At my former job (an ISP), I recommended users to use SMTP service from
they
e-mail providers, because
- if someone gets paid for mail service, they should provide SMTP
On Fri 23/Aug/2013 23:00:01 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 20:00 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Unfortunately, I hadn't updated MYSQL_SELECT_CLAUSE which
had been copied from a previous courier installation on another server
which didn't look at my auth flag. The result
Sorry for the delay, I was in a badly connected place.
On Wed 21/Aug/2013 11:35:17 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.08.13 19:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call. There are not many differences,
but it seems to be a good occasion to review SPF
On Wed 21/Aug/2013 02:42:39 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:59 -0700, Nick Ellson wrote:
It appears that the main issue was that my account credentials were
compromised for a 1 month period, which loaded my system up with so
much spam things would not function. This made
On Tue 20/Aug/2013 01:33:34 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I agree that in this situation, 'none' would be the more technically
proper result. This will be changed.
BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call. There are not many differences,
but it seems to be a good occasion to review SPF
On Fri 16/Aug/2013 04:55:10 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 22:04 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I wish I could say otherwise, but that's what it is. The flip side of the
coin is that IMAP is a mature protocol. It does its job, and there is no
viable replacement for it.
On Fri 26/Jul/2013 22:08:58 +0200 Anders wrote:
By chance I compared the dkim=fail against what SpamAssassin said:
== courier log
Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierfilter:
zdkimfilter[12888]:id=00C804FC.51F2D1E6.3235:
verified: dkim=fail
On Mon 29/Jul/2013 09:12:12 +0200 I wrote:
On Fri 26/Jul/2013 22:08:58 +0200 Anders wrote:
By chance I compared the dkim=fail against what SpamAssassin said:
== courier log
Jul 26 21:45:47 e350 courierfilter:
zdkimfilter[12888]:id=00C804FC.51F2D1E6.3235:
Hi,
On Wed 24/Jul/2013 00:17:17 +0200 Anders wrote:
So, now comes to testing it all... To summarize, no mails are signed
because I think that zdkimfilter can't find anything suitable to match
domain/selector against. What can be the cause?
I think that's because you set RELAYCLIENT based
On Wed 24/Jul/2013 06:10:15 +0200 Direct Logic wrote:
Is there any method to save copy of users email on other location with
courier just like exim shadow copy save. when mail is fetched by user
its copy stores in location define by admin.
Check ARCHIVEDIR in your courierd config file.
On Wed 24/Jul/2013 13:39:37 +0200 Anders wrote:
I'll comment in-line.
Yup :-)
I am using zdkimfilter-1.2 , provided by gentoo ebuild/portage. Compiler
is gcc 4.7.3
I haven't been able to find that version --see below.
I think that's because you set RELAYCLIENT based on the IP address,
On Wed 24/Jul/2013 20:51:06 +0200 Anders wrote:
On 2013-07-24 18:10, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The opendkim-2.2.2 version they used to build zdkimfilter seems to be
lost.
I realise I have a local overlay with zdkimfilter-1.2. I will revert to 1.1.
It won't get things better. Knowing
Hi Anders,
On Sun 21/Jul/2013 13:23:16 +0200 Anders wrote:
Can someone contribute with some example configuration files for
zdkimfilter and courier, especially for signing outgoing mail.
something like this zone-file snippet?
beta._domainkey IN TXT ( v=DKIM1; k=rsa;
Hi,
I lose some imap flags that I put on delivery by setting the KEYWORDS
environment variable in a maildrop recipe. I tried to dump the
dialog between imaplogin and thunderbird, but couldn't grasp what
happens:
There are several sequences where each folder is queried without
showing the flags,
This release works with recent Courier development releases:
* It has a trust_ar option, to accept Authentication-Results header
fields rather than deleting the ones that claim, by virtue of their
authentication service identifier, to have been added locally.
* It reads the dnswl information
On Sat 23/Feb/2013 00:24:13 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Kristian Duus Østergaard writes:
On 2013-02-22 14:35, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Kristian Duus Østergaard writes:
mkdir -p ${PIDFILE%/*}
Hopefully, that's all that your Gentoo package puts into /var/run.
If your package uses the
On Fri 22/Mar/2013 01:10:35 +0100 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
I've run into the problem described at
http://courier-mail-server.10983.n7.nabble.com/courieresmtp-quot-No-such-file-or-directory-quot-td11972.html
I'm running Courier 0.66.1 as distributed with Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS,
Ignoring
On Thu 21/Feb/2013 14:31:05 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
• Courier will add an Authentication-Results when using DNS-based
whitelists. More info in the couriertcpd man page, and the esmtpd
configuration file.
I installed this today, and it seems to work fine. Thanks Sam!!
One thing I think
On Thu 24/Jan/2013 13:08:21 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Just looking at the results of trying to meta-program the DNSBL lookup
logic in couriertcpd, using pcre, doesn't look right to me. PCRE in
couriertcpd would be ok, it's just all the rest of it looks overly
complicated.
Yeah, it
On Thu 24/Jan/2013 02:00:15 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
-allow=zone[,varspec]...
[...]
Now for passing the results to global filters. In 2010 we thought of
I still think -allow is ok, but I don't see much need to do anything
with regards to the headers
/assignments/email-auth/email-auth.xml
On Wed 29/Sep/2010 23:56:50 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
On 28/Sep/10 23:18, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
An alternative is to define skiplists explicitly, e.g.
-allow=swl.spamhaus.org,ALLOW \
-block
On Wed 16/Jan/2013 07:19:17 +0100 Bernd Wurst wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 20:01, schrieb Lindsay Haisley:
Slightly OT, but about half or more of Sam's posts to this list show an
invalid signature in my mail reader. The PGP (GPG) ID of the signature
is the same - 81E550E2 - whether it shows up as
On Sat 29/Dec/2012 11:18:53 +0100 Asmaa Ahmed wrote:
[re-arranged for inline replying]
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:45:58 +0100, From: ves...@tana.it
On Sat 29/Dec/2012 04:29:34 +0100 Asmaa Ahmed wrote:
I wonder how does courier-imap know that the client is connected, so he
starts processing his
On Sat 29/Dec/2012 04:29:34 +0100 Asmaa Ahmed wrote:
I wonder how does courier-imap know that the client is connected, so he
starts processing his messages from 'new' directory to 'cur' directory?
Daemon processes are listening on the IMAP ports. When they accept
a new connection they get to
On Fri 14/Dec/2012 13:03:50 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
On Fri 14/Dec/2012 01:01:23 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
get changed to:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
After
This time with the patch...
On Fri 14/Dec/2012 13:03:50 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
On Fri 14/Dec/2012 01:01:23 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
get changed to:
From: u...@example.com
On Fri 14/Dec/2012 01:01:23 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
when I receive a message with, say:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
those non-compliant headers get changed to:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
I'm unclear on where
Sam,
when I receive a message with, say:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
those non-compliant headers get changed to:
From: u...@example.com
To: l...@example.org
I'm unclear on where the angle bracket removal happens. The code in
submit.C seems to be concerned with
Hi,
On Wed 05/Dec/2012 19:46:42 +0100 Jérôme Blion wrote:
Le 05/12/2012 18:28, Alessandro Vesely a écrit :
This version implements blocking an authenticated user, which I hope
will never trigger. One can specify a plain file with a list of users
that the filter will reject. The file can
This version implements blocking an authenticated user, which I hope
will never trigger. One can specify a plain file with a list of users
that the filter will reject. The file can be populated by zdkimfilter
basing on the result of an sql query, or by any other means.
The dkimsign command has
Hi Matthias,
On Mon 03/Dec/2012 16:21:10 +0100 Matthias Wimmer wrote:
I just downloaded the new archive and had some problems compiling it:
- There are some problems with zdkimfilter if nettle is not installed:
- redact.c cannot be compiled without “#include parm.h” being
Daniel,
On Tue 20/Nov/2012 12:56:38 +0100 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
cour...@devloop.de writes:
Just another question: Alessandro was talking about embedded mode
of maildrop. I have seen in the documentation that this mode is
enabled by -m or -M option. But where I have to set this option?
Is
On Mon 19/Nov/2012 19:58:43 +0100 courier wrote:
BLACKLISTS=-block=ix.dnsbl.manitu.net,BLOCK_DNSBL_MANITU
That looks fine to me.
As far as I have understood BLOCK_DNSBL_MANITU is an environment variable
which gets set if the sender IP is listed in the DNSBL. Now I did the
following in
On Wed 14/Nov/2012 11:16:26 +0100 Mark Constable wrote:
We've got a few thousand users and every now and then one will
answer a phishing spam with their login details
Heck. In that case it's useless to estimate a password's entropy and
then count the failed attempts against it :-/
Some
On Wed 14/Nov/2012 06:57:14 +0100 Andy Gajetzki wrote:
We have a small mail server for our organization handling both
incoming and outgoing mail smtp auth. One of the users had a weak
password, and a brute forcer got a hold of it. They sent about 1.1
million messages before I noticed. We
On Tue 09/Oct/2012 23:01:53 +0200 William Hue wrote:
Original messages with attachments (or, at least, 2+ MIME sections)
created by M$ LookOut! will usually generate Invalid 7bit data
errors, as will forwarding said messages (and the Invalid 7bit
data DSNs!) using Thunderbird. Creating a
On Wed 03/Oct/2012 00:47:01 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Mark Constable writes:
Just wondering if it may ever be possible to see a authsqlite option
for the authdaemon one day?
ATM I have to use postfix on embedded devices... painful. MySQL and
Postgresql are out of the question because of
On Thu 23/Aug/2012 07:05:27 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
So, with the sender doesn't really have a way of knowing what happened, the
sender will rightfully assume – and it would be the correct choice – that
it failed, and will try
On Thu 19/Jul/2012 12:21:20 +0200 Matthias Wimmer wrote:
Hi Anders,
Anders schrieb am 2012-07-17 19:29:14:
Which version of OpenDKIM are you using?
I am Gentoo based and available versions are 2.4.3 and 2.5.2-r1 plus
unstable (2.6.0 2.6.1 2.6.3 2.6.4)
I am using zdkimfilter-0.5 and
On Mon 16/Jul/2012 23:43:31 +0200 Anders wrote:
I've been looking at both links from
http://www.courier-mta.org/links.html and they are outdated; zdkimfilter
seem to rely on an old version of OpenDKIM
OpenDKIM relentlessly issue new versions, one after the other, but
they shouldn't have
On Tue 26/Jun/2012 13:14:34 +0200 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Sam Varshavchik
mr...@courier-mta.com mailto:mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
There are no prescribed means for handling bad DNS data. If DNS is
wrong, one cannot have any expectation that it will
On Wed 20/Jun/2012 01:36:32 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
Jun 11 20:57:34 north courierlocal: [...] size=5061
Jun 11 20:53:18 north courierlocal: [...] size=4921
The supposedly lost message was just 140 bytes longer than the second
(size should have increased by 1k
On Tue 12/Jun/2012 14:37:43 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
I apparently lost a message. I found it in the log:
[...]
But it wasn't in the folder it should have gone to. It isn't
anywhere.
The Maildrop recipe consists of if (...) { ...; to ./...; }
and terminates
On Sat 12/May/2012 10:18:35 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
Does anyone have any stats, or reference to recent surveys, with some
figures?
For a very very very skewed survey, since Courier is one of the MTA
packages that support SPF, its share among those who enable
reject-on-fail at the MAIL
All,
as you may know, an IETF working group is reviewing the SPF spec.
The evaluation of current deployment is nearly completed, but thus far
only analyzes published SPF records. Please contribute to a better
understanding by completing the survey:
On Sat 14/Apr/2012 17:43:19 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
Available in what way?
Note that many clients support ETRN, while not many support calling
external comands...
Really? Which clients would those be. Honestly, I haven't heard anyone
mention ETRN in
On Fri 13/Apr/2012 11:43:33 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This the courieresmtpd will only log ETRN message with source IP,
and implementing the functionality is up to external scripts
watching logs...
But then to watch the logs is not quite a breeze. Isn't it more
effective to have a
On 10/Mar/12 19:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
On 10/Mar/12 02:03, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
makemime creates new content, while reformail munges top level mail
headers.
makemime is able to consume multiple pipes at once. Are you planning
to have reformime provide
On 10/Mar/12 02:03, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
reformime -X /usr/bin/funzip | xsltproc dmarc_report.xsl
and get text/html (which is more readable.) Thus, it might be enough
to suitably pipe the above through makemime. But how do I keep the
existing header
Hi Sam and all
What is the best method to transform a message, changing only some
headers while mangling its content, possibly without explicitly
creating temporary files?
Until now, for process-triggering messages, I've just run some command
via xfilter, appending any output after the original
On 26/Feb/12 12:09, Mike Korizek wrote:
If the email is digitally signed first, the verification fails due
to this re-writing.
I have no access to the server where courier runs on but I can
filter/process the email before it gets signed and sent to courier
and before it gets verified and
The IETF yesterday issued the following four Proposed Standards by the
Email Address Internationalization (eai) working group
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/eai/ :
Overview and Framework for Internationalized Email
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6530
SMTP Extension for Internationalized Email
On 17/Jan/12 00:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 16.01.12 19:28, Jean-Christophe Boggio wrote:
Why ? The FROM field is just informational (is it even mandatory ?)
FWIW, according to Section 3.6 of RFC 5322, From: is one of the two
fields whose minimum number of occurrences is non-zero (the
On 09/Jan/12 11:38, Sergi Pons Freixes wrote:
From what I understand from the documentation, a maildir is
actually a hierachy of subfolders (./new, ./cur, ./tmp, etc),
which is usually located at /home/user/Maildir.
Yes, Maildir is the default mail directory, in a user's home.
You may want
On 03/Dec/11 05:28, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Ken Perl writes:
When a session is terminated by courier, what code and error will
return to client to handle such situation, then a client will have
chance to retry?
When the daemons are forcibly restarted, there is no explicit error
code that
On 23/Nov/11 11:51, Nik Mitev wrote:
During testing it turned out that password checking is behaving
unexpectedly. If I configure a password of 'test' in authdb I can login
with 'test' AND 'testwhatevermaybehere' - any string that starts with
the configured password will do.
1. Is this a
On 22/Nov/11 10:51, Benjamin Meier wrote:
# debug.log:
Nov 22 09:40:31 mars courieresmtpd: started,ip=[::1]
Nov 22 09:41:11 mars courieresmtpd: authdaemon: s_connect() failed:
Permission denied
Nov 22 09:41:11 mars courieresmtpd:
On 12/Nov/11 01:38, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Lucio Crusca writes:
In data martedì 27 settembre 2011 23:49:25, Sam Varshavchik ha scritto:
Lucio Crusca writes:
7. some users share a common mailbox (info@). They
SHOULD see unread messages as unread, even when another user
has already read
On 06/Nov/11 05:47, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
If the error was temporary, I could disable TLS negotiation for remote
server and ask them to fix the problem.
After some soul-searching, I've changed my mind. I'm going to change
so that the default configuration
On 04/Nov/11 01:48, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
An intermediate approach could be to have a starttls-something
database anyway, where each host's entry contains the state of
the last handshake, any of known CA, auto-trusted with
fingerprint and dates, or broken
On 30.10.2011 20:03, Ben Kennedy wrote:
On 30 Oct 2011, at 7:50 am, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
We don't need to actually trust the certificate if all what is wanted
is to encrypt the channel for privacy.
I bet Sam is going to say: if you don't trust the cert, how can you be
sure
On 27/Oct/11 13:45, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 15.08.11 15:02, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
There are several possibilities. If the STARTTLS command itself
fails, it's an SMTP error no difference then any other SMTP error,
and will be either permanent or transient depending on its numerical
On 13/Oct/11 12:52, aueb-...@aueb.gr wrote:
Thank you very much Alessandro for your answer
You're welcome.
This is exactly what I need...
BTW this environment variable is not mentioned in
localmailfilter/maildrop* documentation ...
unless I have missed it ...
Googling for it, I only found
On 02/Oct/11 11:21, Lucio Crusca wrote:
When Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Passwords can be changed via webmail, with some additional setup. They can
be stored encrypted, however you must realize that fundamental laws of this
universe will not allow you to use hash-based authentication via IMAP
On 28/Sep/11 14:06, Lucio Crusca wrote:
In data mercoledì 28 settembre 2011 12:55:47, Sam Varshavchik ha scritto:
Yes, but that's a separate configuration issue. Whether you're going to
allow non-encrypted IMAP, POP3, or HTTP connections is separate from
whether or not passwords are kept
On 31/Aug/11 05:09, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Alessandro Vesely writes:
[http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap]
Looking over this, it doesn't really do a lot that cannot be
accomplished in IMAP already. All this is, is just an alias for a
COPY+DELETE+EXPUNGE
The Internet-Draft below originates in the framework of Enhanced
Visual Voice Mail, Open Mobile Alliance (www.openmobilealliance.org),
but the idea seems to be cleanly amenable to any IMAP implementation.
I look forward to clients and servers implementing it, so that the
hacking needed to get
On 26/Jul/11 19:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Does courier do an autoclean if the filter fails?
Or is the filter expected to be so robust that it's not needed?
Courier sends the prepackaged 432 Mail filters temporarily
unavailable in case of failure. Cleaning up queues is presumably
part
On 21/Jul/11 14:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 19.07.11 19:53, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Yes, _was_ until version 57.1, announced on 14 October 2007 (The line
saying Invoke Courier filters after closing all control files.)
Hmmm, does that apply for data file too? ;-)
However
On 18/Jul/11 15:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I'm afraid this is caused by drweb-courier dropping all mail and
creating new one - as someone here mentioned, it is (or was) the only
way to add headers to mail.
Yes, _was_ until version 57.1, announced on 14 October 2007 (The line
saying
On 08/Jul/11 10:23, kajani kaunda wrote:
I want to allow users who login using a non-fully qualified email
address like:
'john'
and NOT
'j...@abc.com'
to be able to change their passwords FROM the sqwebmail interface.
as of now it throws the following error when you try to change
On 11/Apr/11 08:48, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
Hello,
apparently SSLv2 support has been removed from recent OpenSSL versions which
cause
Courier to fail building:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622014
Please suggest a solution.
* Eliminate SSLv2 also from
On 01/Apr/11 12:59, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
I'm fine with Received-SPF being renamed when mail is received from
untrusted host. But for mail received from our (trusted) mail backups:
- the SPF check will apparently fail (thus I better turn if off)
- I could
Hi,
I change the subject not only for the delay --that I apologize for--
but also for the desire to take into account Michelle's recent post.
On 23/Mar/11 20:13, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.03.11 13:26, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
That will apparently result in non-uniform filtering
On 21.03.2011 20:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.03.11 02:38, bamakoj...@gmail.com wrote:
The advantage of running spamc from perl/pythonfilter (IMO) is that you
can reject mail based on spam score. The disadvantage, if I understand
correctly, is that you can't have per-user settings
On 03/Mar/11 04:20, Mark Constable wrote:
We just had 2 accounts compromised and used for sending out a ton of
spam, one I found because an irate recipient sent back a complaint
which included the headers and the AUTH: LOGIN details.
That only has the user's name, not the password. It is in
On 24/Feb/11 22:23, Carlos Lopez wrote:
The Kernel lacks support of Deep Packet Inspection... With DPI
you can do all dirty tricks to leave crackers out of the box/net.
It is true that the main kernel does not support it, but there are
many commercial vendors that are open sourcing their
101 - 200 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
