Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
url: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/helveN-L.html
Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS X 10.7) with any
Gecko/ Firefox browser? If yes, there is a bug in Gecko.
(I assume default font preferences - 'western' should use 'serif' as a default).
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Seamonkey 2.5 (/still/ no auto-update to 2.6.1; has this been
completely forogtten ?), Win/XP :
Serif, serif, serif, sans-serif, sans-serif.
Possible depending on what you have installed; that is not what I
On Jan 4, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Possible depending on what you have installed; that is not what I asked
though…
The Q was specifically about OS X 10.7
Now I am intrigued : if (as per your original message),
Do the first two paragraphs display as serif fonts on Lion (OS
On the subject of getting the latest copy of the CSS file each time, you
can add a unique value to the URI of the CSS file.
Instead of:
link href=MyStyles.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
Use (on first load):
link href=MyStyles.css?t=12345 rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
And second load:
What I suggest you is using PHP.
link rel=stylesheet href=/css/main.css??php echo time();?
type=text/css /
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 19:29, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm noticing that not every browser refreshes the CSS even when using
shift + refresh. Based on
On Jan 4, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Boray ERIS wrote:
What I suggest you is using PHP.
link rel=stylesheet href=/css/main.css??php echo time();?
type=text/css /
This would work provided the php interpreter parses the page.
To insure parsing, change the suffix of the web page from '.html' to
1/ Confirm that the CSS and markup are valid, that it is not hanging on a CSS
error, and that you have saved the CSS file before uploading it.
It's not always possible to use valid css due to proprietary css markup such
as -webkit, -moz, as I'm using CSS3 the HTML markup however is valid.
What I suggest you is using PHP.
link rel=stylesheet href=/css/main.css??php echo time();?
type=text/css /
Boray Eris
www.pidizayn.com
Yea I saw that in the article:
http://css-tricks.com/can-we-prevent-css-caching/ but there was debate within
the comments on which format was better to
Instead of:
link href=MyStyles.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
Use (on first load):
link href=MyStyles.css?t=12345 rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
And second load:
link href=MyStyles.css?t=12346 rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
Obviously, this is simplified when using some server-side
Hi Everyone,
Am working on a coming soon page for my site and @font-face doesn't seem to be
working. Not sure why .I implemented @font-face on another project and it was
fine. Now it's not working for this. I am using a different font now - could
this have something to do with it?
Elli
Yes, of course it could. A huge number of things could have gone wrong
— without an example it is almost impossible to provide helpful
advice.
However:
• Often, it's just a misplaced file issue: the fonts are in the wrong
directory relative to the stylesheet with the declaration, or said
Hi Barney!
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for Windows,
IE9, IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's in FF where I'm
having the problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and what you see on those
versions of FF, is the fallback font (Brush Script STD) of
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for Windows, IE9,
IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's in FF where I'm having the
problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and what you see on those
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for Windows,
IE9, IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's in FF where I'm
having the problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and what you see on those
versions of FF, is the fallback font (Brush Script STD) of the font
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
The font is in its own directory. The link you provided places the the fonts
directory within the CSS directory. I don't know why it's a problem this time
around because the way I wrote my CSS code is exactly how I used it in another
project
The font is in its own directory. The link you provided places the the fonts
directory within the CSS directory. I don't know why it's a problem this time
around because the way I wrote my CSS code is exactly how I used it in
another project (http://www.e7flux.com/clients/sof/) and it
Elli,
As Philip Taylor has correctly pointed out, the URI you used in your
style sheet is a relative URI.
The CSS specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#uri) has
this to say about relative URIs:
For CSS style sheets, the base URI is that of the style sheet, not that
of the
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
For future projects you might also consider using a web font service such as
Fontsquirrel to avoid other web font-related issues.
What are the other web font-related issues you refer to here?
KathyW.
Elli,
As Philip Taylor has correctly pointed out, the URI you used in your
style sheet is a relative URI.
The CSS specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#uri) has
this to say about relative URIs:
For CSS style sheets, the base URI is that of the style sheet, not that
The font is in its own directory. The link you provided places the the
fonts directory within the CSS directory. I don't know why it's a
problem this time around because the way I wrote my CSS code is exactly how I
used it in another project (http://www.e7flux.com/clients/sof/) and it
Am 04.01.12 23:26, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
For future projects you might also consider using a web font
service such as Fontsquirrel to avoid other web font-related
issues.
What are the other web font-related issues you refer to here?
Hello,
I am kindly asking for help hoping that a dozen pairs of eyes might see
more than I do.
A friend of mine has a Wordpress blog: http://run-united.com
He told me that after he changed something, there was a problem in the
start page: The right column containing certain widgets was
Are you sure it's working in your other project
(http://www.e7flux.com/clients/sof/)? Because when i go to that site
I get the same error message in chrome for littledays.ttf and that
font definitely does not show up. Your issue is you're using the
relative src from where the css is
2012-01-05 0:54, Christian Kirchhoff wrote:
A friend of mine has a Wordpress blog: http://run-united.com
He told me that after he changed something, there was a problem in the
start page: The right column containing certain widgets was suddenly
pushed down below the main column with the recent
On Wednesday 2012-01-04 11:16 -0800, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for
Windows, IE9, IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's
in FF where I'm having the problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and
what you see on those versions of FF, is
On Firefox, in the Web Console (open it with Tools - Web Developer
- Web Console prior to loading the page), I see the error message:
downloadable font: rejected by sanitizer (font-family: creampuff
style:normal weight:normal stretch:normal src index:0) source:
From what I can see in FF/Firebug the problem that's causing the side bar to
push down is this:
#content {
margin: 0 280px 0 20px;
}
That's a huge margin on the right side of the content div. Plus there are no
width specified for either of the divs: #content #primary. If you're not
I'm developing a page (only needs to be viewable by MSIE at this time)
where there is a div containing 2 images and 2 text blurbs.
The upper image is at the top and floats left with the text flowing
around it on the right, which mostly works.
The lower image is supposed to be opposite;
Am 05.01.12 01:05, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
On 01/05/2012, at 9:53 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
Am 04.01.12 23:26, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
For future projects you might also consider using a web font
service such as Fontsquirrel to avoid other
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me what version of Chrome and OS you're viewing from? And have
you checked it out in any other browsers? Because it was never an issue
before. The link had been up for discussion in another post a couple of
The easiest way is to have something like this:
#cindyContainer img {
float: left;
margin: 0 10px 4px 0;
}
#jenniferBio img {
float: right;
margin: 0 0 4px 10px;
}
Look at this sample page:
http://www.mytechnet.talktalk.net/trainers01.htm
Good luck.
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me what version of Chrome and OS you're viewing from? And
have you checked it out in any other browsers? Because it was never an issue
before. The link had been up for discussion in another post a couple of
When you use a path like fonts/creampuff.ttf that is
relative to where your css file is located at and so the browser is
going to look in
http://www.e7flux.com/e7flux2012/css/fonts/creampuff.ttf.
I also think you're convinced it's an absolute path issue but it's not. You get
an error
Am working on a coming soon page for my site and @font-face doesn't seem to
be working. Not sure why .I implemented @font-face on another project and it
was fine. Now it's not working for this. I am using a different font now -
could this have something to do with it?
I believe you need
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me what version of Chrome and OS you're viewing from? And
have you checked it out in any other browsers? Because it was never an issue
before. The link had been up for discussion in
35 matches
Mail list logo
