it have to be a background image?
I don't know, but it looks to me like he has a wide background image
centered horizontally inside a div. When I widen my browser window to
full width (1280px), I see more of the image - not a stretched or larger
version of the image.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Thanks, David
It looks like that. So the solution only works with backgorund images.
Now then! I now to need to find a way of having changing background images,
as one can have using JavaScript.
I don't know what might happen if you put an img inside the div, made
the image wider than
Ian Young wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of david
Sent: 04 August 2007 10:53
To: css-d
Subject: Re: [css-d] Fluid images
Ian Young wrote:
Thanks, David
It looks like that. So the solution only works with backgorund images
digging but any assistance that can be offered in the meantime would be
much
appreciated! Cheers!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
;
}
table caption {
caption-side: top;
/* NB *
/* padding needs extra allowance for border */
padding: 0.25em;
}
Fractional ems combined with pixels? I think you're just asking for
rounding errors ...
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
of different size disrupt the vertical flow. As you
will see, this can be achieved via a combination of margin (in ems)
and line-height.
So long as you specify things being aware that - unlike print typography
- you have no control over font choice or size ...
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Linux. No crash with Javascript
enabled, either.
I have 20 extensions loaded in FF and only 768MB of RAM.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
WEZ! wrote:
ohh monospace means each character takes up an equal width so the
width of the character 'i' will be the same as an 'm'
And a boss from a print industry background will immediately consider
that unacceptable!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
Hi, Rick - just letting you know that I'm not the original poster - so
I'm CCing this on to the list where the original poster can see it ... ;-)
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, David...
The bottom line here is that your boss is going to have to understand
that paper and browsers are two very
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:50:00 +0100, Dermot Ward wrote:
[...]I've been grappling with this
particular problem now for a couple of weeks so here goes with my first post.
Is it possible to have a semi - transparent box within a div, that allows
the containing
div's
.
Outside of that, CSS is much more manageable! ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css
solution.
Biggest advantage of tables is still the fact the it's the only way you
can achieve a multicolumn layout *when CSS is disabled*.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED
egos of folk involved in
designing the site.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
Ray Leventhal wrote:
david wrote:
snip
While in a perfect world I'd agree with David, it's not so much the
'tender egos of folk involved in designing the site' it's usually,
imnsho, the un- or refused-to-be-educated folk who actually pay for the
site to look/feel a certain way.
0.02
if it will help your image any (the image has the problem
even when viewed by itself), but it would help the page work better
across browsers.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
David Terrell wrote:
www.cometothewell.org/newsite.
I'm new to css. This is the first site that I've coded in css. My
problem is that there seems to be a padding that is shoving all of
the content down on the page when it loads in any browser. I don't
whose owner hasn't bought a copy of the font. I guess there
were a couple of technologies to do that, but IIRC both were proprietary
and pretty much neither was adopted by anyone ...
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
of command line
tools that can be run via CGI to generate heading images on the fly.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
to visitors' computers. CSS is not. Not
a religious issue but a well documented fact.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
box on Article: A-D, I pressed Enter and got the A-D
horizontal menu. Pressing Alt-Left Arrow brought me back to the page
with the active box on the A-D tab, but the horizontal menu for Menus
showing.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
to be silly. I think
it's just asking to trigger any browser bugs about just how that final
.3% is translated into a real-world pixel. I liked the line heights
better when I changed it to 1.3 (no units).
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
one of the layouts from Layout Gala. Or grab the layout from a
site you like.
A good book or two would
also help you get started. This group's wiki may have some good
recommendations.
Not to mention the books by our illustrious list owner, Eric Meyer!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees it as a
blank page.
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:11:36 +0100, Colin Mcgarry wrote:
I've just set up Opera to see how it deals with my web pages. I was
surprised to see
my home page has no css
are using
Safari
I think the browser sniffing isn't working?
Colin Mcgarry wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees it as a
blank page.
David Hucklesby wrote
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:54:52 +0100, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
Dear all,
after a long period of depression, ...
Odd, that. So many highly talented people I read about seem to have
suffered depression, at least in some part of their lives. Hmm.
Although I am
problems.
Can't help you there. You're using a font I won't see at all, since I
don't have it installed.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
point of view?
Makes sense to me, but I'm not expert.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
the visitor mouses over the icon?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
=text/css /
Error: style is not a member of a group specified for any attribute
Could someone please tell me what this means.
You have an extraneous word in your link coding: style. Removing it
will fix that validation problem.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
that properties
like pos.absolute, table-cell, float, inline-block come with?
Hmmm, I always thought that auto kind of carried the idea of
shrink-to-fit?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
in IE7?
My particular problem regards positioning. I find that extra pixel or
two in IE can make a design look less than stellar.
david wrote:
!important is not invalid. !ie is.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
know what width that is, make it as wide as the content.
Unless you're IE - then you always make it as wide as the content.
Right?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Mike Schinkel wrote:
david wrote:
!important is not a hack. It's an official W3C thing,
That doesn't mean is can't still be called a hack... '-p
I'll let people who use hacks talk about what constitutes a hack.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
-to-fit algorithm would then
function as figure out the size of the content inside the floated
element, then make the floated element big enough to hold it.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss
J wrote:
Thanks, David. Your boxes in boxes analogy got my mind working and I
think I figured out what was wrong with the graphic not showing up,
although what I came up with is making the test page inside of
Dreamweaver look all twisted. But that's probably another thread of
discussion
Jeralyn Merideth wrote:
Alan,
That did it! Thanks so much! I need to read up on he hasLayout bug :-)
Jeralyn Merideth - Owner
You need to design for Firefox, then tweak pages to work in IE, not the
other way around.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
Jehangir Larry wrote:
david wrote:
J wrote:
Thanks, David. Your boxes in boxes analogy got my mind working and
I think ...
[Snip]-- David (not the legendary David referred to above)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
Time to start a fan club?!
I think the legendary David
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:33:02 +0100, Colin Brace wrote:
There is something peculiar happening with my webserver and it is difficult
for me to
tell what is going on from here. On my desktop system, opening my site's
index.html
file from a local directory, Firefox
David Laakso wrote:
Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
I had a look at some browser shots of this site, and it seems to have
issues in IE 5.5/6. In fact, I couldn't see any content in either of
these browsers. Can someone take a look and see what might be the
problem here?
http://thewei.com/sandbox
parent pushes updates from their own
update servers and doesn't decide to update to IE7. My present employer,
for instance, probably won't budge from IE6 until IE8 is in release
(compatibility issues with a number of in-house web applications used
every day).
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED
with three items, with the starting value of each list set dynamically
to begin the number following the last item in the previous list. If you
have 12 items, you spit out the same three divs, but put four items in
each list and adjust the start values.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity
, and this was their recommended
method), this is the most effective way to deliver styles within an
email, though it is not valid code wise.
I've heard the best way to go is inline styles. It all depends on the
mail client being used.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
[href* ...
You're way beyond my simple ways.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
quite well.
Other folk use WINE for running other Win32 programs under Linux.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
. ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
Rob freeman wrote:
How do I allow the text to wrap around the image. At the moment the
absolute image is taken out of the document flow, so Im not sure how I
can get the text to wrap
You can only doing it by getting the image back into the flow ...
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity
Rob freeman wrote:
How do I allow the text to wrap around the image. At the moment the
absolute image is taken out of the document flow, so Im not sure how I
can get the text to wrap
You can only doing it by getting the image pack into the flow ...
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity
possibly for aural css, if any, in the case of screen readers).
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:54:43 +, vwf wrote:
I fixed a number of problems with my site, but a problem with ie6 remains.
There are
unwanted spaces in the horizontal list (navigation bar). I see that this is
a well
known problem, but I cannot find the solution
that in the frame with CSS. ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
- it's not a must not thing to mix CSS and
presentational markup in the HTML - but it does make it impossible to
use CSS to completely control the rendering.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css
? It just seems sloppy to me,
like something that my employer's ancient enterprise content management
system might spit out.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
david wrote:
But what's the point of using
things like the font tag when you're using CSS? It just seems
sloppy to me, like something that my employer's ancient enterprise
content management system might spit out.
You just gave a partial answer to your question
Mark Story wrote:
So I just wanted to get an idea of what the oldest
browser you are currently testing for is?
Lynx.
And how are you targetting
them? Hacks, conditional comments, other techniques?
None needed.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
browser X. ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
. And it spreads with each visitor you disappoint.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
paradoxically become more secure -
a lot of Windows worms and viruses can no longer run on it. ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
If you have an HTML document that happens to contain another HTML
document in an iframe - and one of the two documents triggers quirks
mode when rendered by itself - is each one rendered in the same mode or
does the browser somehow do one in standards mode and one in quirks mode?
--
David
Alex Robinson wrote:
At 22:36 -1000 9/3/08, david wrote:
If you have an HTML document that happens to contain another HTML
document in an iframe - and one of the two documents triggers quirks
mode when rendered by itself - is each one rendered in the same mode or
does the browser somehow do
is painfully slow for me in IE6. I don't know if it's
just that machine, or something about how putting position:relative on
the body works (or doesn't) in IE6.
Doesn't work in IE6 here, either. Don't know about Mac IE.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
of a problem, IMO.
What do you see in this Zengarden design in IE6? Is it scrolling very
slowly for you, too, or is that just my machine? This design doesn't
seem to include any of your workarounds.
It scrolls very very very slowly here, too. In both FF and IE.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED
David Laakso wrote:
Stuart King wrote:
Simple problems that are am having trouble solving:
1. How do I justify the text in the #bt div:
URL:
http://www.adrianavargasdesign.com/pages/contact.html
I would seriously think twice about doing this, though. Justified type,
handled
these,
Gecko and WebKit are stricter with standards, and will show up badly
formed code more often.
Better to say that with invalid code, all browsers guess where they
think the missing closing tags are supposed to be, and not all browser
guess the same spots.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of the transparent one,
then position it over the transparent element.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Chris Broadfoot wrote:
david wrote:
Daniel Hammond wrote:
| Is there a way to reduce the opacity of the background color | of a
div to a percentage less than 100%,
| but not completely transparent? | 50% for example.
| Daniel Hammond
| yes there is a way:
| check this out:
| http
to be accessible.
Still, I couldn't have fixed this without your help, Gunlaug and
David!!! And thank you, Jason, for the words of cheer. You all rock!
MAJOR lessons learned today.
Yes: don't trust DW and other
What-You-See-Isn't-Really-What-You're-Going-To-Get GUI development
tools
a release version out the door. Doesn't mean
they've frozen further development of IE8. ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
stylesheet add something like:
#index.p { /* do stuff with paragraphs inside my div */ }
Might be easier than going through assigning classes to all those
paragraphs.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css
to use a proprietary MS solution to a strictly MS problem.
As far as I know, if it is using an .htc file, it is using Javascript
(or whatever MS calls their version of it). It's just sitting there in
the .htc file instead of a JS file.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
. ;-)
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Jonathan wrote:
I have looked at and read several CSS books.
Do you have any recommendations as I have not found one that I liked
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css
in a folder called graphs. ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
downloaded and is strictly valid?
A thought crossed my mind. Given IE6's dependence on the HasLayout bug,
would it be possible for it to not render things correctly until
something triggers hasLayout and makes IE render the area in dispute
correctly?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity
Ross Hulford wrote:
What is the selector for all divs?
div { do your css stuff here }?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
design needed, maybe?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List
.
Sorry, I don't remember the official ways to contain floats, but the
list wiki will probably have them all.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
up in FF
Javascript console. You might check them out and see about fixing them.
HTML Validater also reports 26 errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eurovisionltd.co.nz%2Findex_3.php
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
://www.glassbox.nl/deksels/deksels/deksels_verhuur.php
27 validation errors in HTML:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glassbox.nl%2Fdeksels%2Fdeksels%2Fdeksels_verhuur.php
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
:
Apologies for posting earlier in HTML.
Please see www.indobioagri.com
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http
%2Fsprangleblog.com%2F
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki
Message -
From: david [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Menu floats down in IE6
Jehangir Larry wrote:
The navigation includes UL's with spans (to accomodate a JS script that
collapses it.) It involves
Students colon, etc?
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki
?
Relevant CSS - http://www.shs.uiuc.edu/css/sub-menus.css (styles for
iFrame page)
- http://www.shs.uiuc.edu/css/base.css (structural styles)
- http://www.shs.uiuc.edu/css/fonts.css (not strictly
relevant but some overlap)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty
Les Mizzell wrote:
Barney Carroll wrote:
Wondering if anybody had any experience of this particular problem.
http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/inputfile.html
Per W3C validator, the attribute noscript on that page doesn't exist.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
validation errors in your XHTML:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mocap.com%2Fdefault2.asp
From what I saw in Firefox 1.5.0.8 on Linux, what you have so far looks
fine!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
link until the relevance can be sorted out. I'll be happy to provide
the link off-list to any who wants to take a look at it.
I can send you screen captures from Konqueror 3.5.5 if you're interested.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
for Firefox, then tweak for IE. Doing it the other way around
will drive you completely insane!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
the system's seeing. Firefox, Opera then IE6+7 for
render checks, Lynx to see what's really going on (great for SEO too).
I use the Fangs extension for Firefox to learn how sites look to
overpriced programs like JAWS.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
HTML
is a mess - for example, wrapping lists in spans won't work, lists are
block elements, spans are not.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
full-justified text properly.
I've tried to make the site as accessible as I can, but I'm requesting a
site check just in case I've missed anything.
Looks quite accessible to me in Fangs, so I'd guess your JAWS visitors
will be happy.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty
class=even';
echo 'tr class=odd';
The above just gives the odd color.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7
Chris Broadfoot wrote:
David
Thanks for the site check.
and to the best of my knowledge everything
is XHTML and CSS valid.
Valid, yes, but why are there so many empty spans in there?
Image replacement, mostly.
OK.
I'd suggest turning of the full justification on the text in your
you don't need them or could you use a html entity instead like
lsquo; or prime;?
The backslashes shouldn't be appearing in the output HTML. This
indicates a problem in the PHP script.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
...
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Hmm, site doesn't validate at W3C:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2F69.63.142.146%2Fnm%2FArtestimonials.htm
Sorry, WAY too much CSS for me to try to figure out.
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
David Van O wrote:
Thanks.
Not sure why I forgot the link, but will look at these resources.
The page in question is www.aiddogs.com.au/shadowsite
HTML isn't valid - got lots of old style proprietary HTML attributes set
in your code:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F
~davidLaakso wrote:
A page check with with whatever you are running is appreciated.
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/auto/
Gives me a Forbidden message! :-(
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
a drawing board support? ;-)
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List
this stuff out, too. I do
sometimes wonder why CSS doesn't have a simple align:center setting!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
. Support for CSS seems to be
very good, much better than any other WYSIWYG I've used. I think it's
definitely worth serious consideration, especially for those who need
a little extra help with their CSS coding.
cheers, Marcello
David Van O [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all.
I currently use
1 - 100 of 5715 matches
Mail list logo