Re: some questions about commons projects.

2020-06-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> 3. try to fix it and report. > > I don't know whether it be a correct way, but I hope I will not make anyone > suffer.(or at least not that much suffer) > Sorry if I made any trouble. No, that seems fine (but note that if I am to interact, it will _not_ be through GitHu

Re: some questions about commons projects.

2020-06-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
from trying to use a same code style formatter. I agree; someone must be suggesting this every 10 years or so; last time (IIRC) it was me; didn't work. :-} Gilles >>> [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: some questions about commons projects.

2020-06-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
re many issues to work on, big to small down to nit-picks; but surely some have higher "added value". Personally I don't think that creating "nit-pick" PRs is the right way for querying the &qu

Re: some questions about commons projects.

2020-06-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-06-12 15:36 UTC+02:00, Gary Gregory : > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:07 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 13:51, Xeno Amess a écrit : >> > >> > 1. How can a project *** becomes commons-***, or how did a commons

Re: some questions about commons projects.

2020-06-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
the usefulness of the PR and the work required from the reviewer. > 8. What should we do when we have a pr delayed for a long time? And how > long is thought to be an unusual long time for waiting? 3 days.1 week,or 1 > month? They might have been forgotten, or there may other issues. Exa

Re: [commons-graph] branch master updated: Travis CI configuration.

2020-06-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
e refining, we should get[1] a first build: https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/commons-graph Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20413 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additi

Re: [commons-graph] branch master updated: Travis CI configuration.

2020-06-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
box.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-graph.git >> >> >> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: >> new b14766b Travis CI configuration. >> b14766b is described below >> >> commit b14766be60b3722007d19d015bc383e3d83d11b8 >>

Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

2020-06-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello Amey. Le mar. 2 juin 2020 à 03:01, Amey Jadiye a écrit : > > Hi Gilles, > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, 4:36 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > 2020-06-01 22:18 UTC+02:00, Amey Jadiye : > > > Thanks for all the information/support guys. I du

Re: [Graph] moving to git

2020-06-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-06-07 23:28 UTC+02:00, Gilles Sadowski : > Hi. > > I recall that we should move the SVN repository to there: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/_moved_to_git/ > > Does someone remember how to do it? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/commons/Movi

Re: [Graph] moving to git

2020-06-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. I recall that we should move the SVN repository to there: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/_moved_to_git/ Does someone remember how to do it? Thanks, Gilles Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 23:19, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hello. > > Repository available:

Re: [Graph] moving to git

2020-06-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Repository available: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] PR #143

2020-06-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le dim. 7 juin 2020 à 15:07, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > [...] > > The current flood of email messages from GitHub is not sustainable > for me (sorry). I'm not registered on GitHub; hence even when I agree with your proposed changes (e.g. PR #152), I cannot commen

Re: [Math] PR #143

2020-06-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
sue should rather lead to a "Do not use exception for control flow" category. [Then the commit message would be just that (prefixed with the JIRA issue identifier).] The current flood of email messages from GitHub is not sustainable for me (sorry). Thanks, Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.or

Re: [Math] PR #143

2020-06-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ad. Please reply on JIRA, where this discussion should be taking place.[1] Regards, Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1538 > > > Gilles Sadowski 于2020年6月7日周日 上午5:53写道: > >> Hi. >> >> 2020-06-06 14:21 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess : >> > Alright,

Re: [Math] PR #143

2020-06-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
us code used an "index" variable but in the new version there is a hard-coded number). Gilles > [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Math] PR #143

2020-06-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
hanges: one is "use arraycopy" but the > others are not documented anywhere (commit message, JIRA). > Ah, I forgot to create a jira ticket for it. sorry about that. > > So, in conclusion, I will cl

[Math] PR #143

2020-06-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
nly make it into the commit message and/or the corresponding JIRA report). [Also, an appropriately named utility method is probably better than inline statements.] Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Graph] moving to git

2020-06-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
; > Sure, as quick as possible. Requested: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20381 Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

2020-06-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
at use a graph abstraction, there is "Commons RDF". I guess that it would be interesting to see whether/how it could depend on "Commons Graph". Regards, Gilles > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/2xrwjomgkhlxsezm > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-4

Re: commons-graph still on sandbox ?

2020-05-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
t available https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GRAPH ? Strange; again maybe the reason is in the ML archive. Best, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [commons-statistics] Dev suggestions needed

2020-05-28 Thread Gilles Sadowski
posal? A novel viewpoint might give new ideas... ;-) > > I appreciate your help very much. Thanks for your offer! Best regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [commons-statistics] branch master updated (2935a6d -> a991ffa)

2020-05-26 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le mar. 26 mai 2020 à 14:48, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 26 May 2020, at 13:14, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > -1 > > MS-Windows EOL characters were introduced in commit > >f5fdaea51455f31a51973eb17f90450a69688fbc > > OK. The issue

Re: [commons-statistics] branch master updated (2935a6d -> a991ffa)

2020-05-26 Thread Gilles Sadowski
-1 MS-Windows EOL characters were introduced in commit f5fdaea51455f31a51973eb17f90450a69688fbc Le mar. 26 mai 2020 à 12:32, a écrit : > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aherbert pushed a change to branch master > in repository

Re: [releases,dbutils] There are 4 staged copies of dbutils-1.8

2020-05-22 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ctive) pool of regular developers get released more often and with less waiting time for binding votes... Gilles > > Gary > > > > > > Just my 2 cents... > > > > Melloware > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [releases,dbutils] There are 4 staged copies of dbutils-1.8

2020-05-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
into 'commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2'... fatal: Remote branch commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 not found in upstream origin ---CUT--- Regards, Gilles 2020-05-21 17:04 UTC+02:00, Melloware : > Carl, > > It seems like there is just not enough PMC committers available for > Commons projects. It shoul

Re: [ JEXL] Java 6 ?

2020-05-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
, it is fine to require Java 8. Regards, Gilles > On 5/20/20 3:47, henrib wrote: > > Quick poll before attempting to release JEXL 3.1; > > Should we still release with support for Java 6 or should we move ahead with > > at least Java 8 ? > > Seems to me Java 6 is old en

Re: [ JEXL] Java 6 ?

2020-05-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
opped. If "old" is a burden, yes, but not a good reason per se. IOW: What would be the advantages? > One could still build from source with java 6 if needed. Doesn't that mean that it would still support Java 6? Regards, Gilles > What do you think ? > Cheers > > > > --

Re: [geometry] Centroid vs Barycenter

2020-05-17 Thread Gilles Sadowski
; > I know this is nit-picking since the two terms mean the same thing, If in [Geometry] there is no notion of mass, "centroid" is more appropriate than "center of mass". > but I'd > like to make the library as intuitive as possible for first-time users. +1 Gilles &

Re: [ALL] Creating Utils method wrappers for Kotlin

2020-05-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-05-11 11:55 UTC+02:00, Isira Seneviratne : > On Mon, May 11, 2020, 3:22 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> 2020-05-11 11:06 UTC+02:00, Isira Seneviratne : >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Earlier, I started a discussion about porting the Utils classes in >> Com

Re: [ALL] Creating Utils method wrappers for Kotlin

2020-05-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-05-11 11:06 UTC+02:00, Isira Seneviratne : > Hi all, > > Earlier, I started a discussion about porting the Utils classes in Commons > Lang to Kotlin, but Gilles Sadowski suggested that this approach could be > extended to the Utils classes of all the Commons libraries. What I

Re: [LANG] Porting to Kotlin

2020-05-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-05-11 1:01 UTC+02:00, Isira Seneviratne : > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:24 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 15:34, Isira Seneviratne a >> écrit : >> > >> > I hope my answer was helpful. If you need any more in

Re: [BloomFilters] changes to BloomFilter

2020-05-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
en IMO it does not belong. > Would it make more sense to > spit it out as a new Commons project? +1 [And +1 to making a beta release.] > How does one even go about that? A request to INFRA and off we go... [Perhaps a (lazy) vote is in order.

Re: [apache/commons-email] consider about putting it to github?

2020-05-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
roper/email/trunk' doesn't exist https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-email.git HTH, Gilles > > 4.Yes I can see the released codes, but with no commit history. > > Thanks. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@c

Re: [LANG] Porting to Kotlin

2020-05-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
be worth posting in a new thread (with the "[ALL]" prefix). Thanks, Gilles > On Sun, May 10, 2020, 7:03 PM Isira Seneviratne > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020, 6:55 PM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > >> Hi. &

Re: [LANG] Porting to Kotlin

2020-05-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
rogrammers are willing to participate to the "upstream" Java project, of course). Regards, Gilles >> [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [log4j] InitTest fails in release-2.x

2020-04-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Wrong list. 2020-04-30 0:33 UTC+02:00, Gary Gregory : > I always get this failure in release-2.x and 'mvn clean install -V': > > [INFO] Running org.apache.logging.log4j.core.util.InitTest > Timer Log4j Initialization stopped. Elapsed time: 1.316873519 seconds > [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1,

Re: [BloomFilters] changes to BloomFilter

2020-04-22 Thread Gilles Sadowski
", in classes "Murmur128x64Cyclic" and "Murmur32x86Iterative": import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3; > Tangent: There were UML tools/Maven plugins in the past that could > visualize these kinds of relationships, has anyone used any in the recent > past? A

Re: [BloomFilters] changes to BloomFilter

2020-04-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
t progress depends on intended usage? > > Opinions on how to proceed? I got lost along the way; sorry. Are there still uncertainties about the "basic" features? Regards, Gilles > > Alex > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Geometry] CSG?

2020-04-19 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le sam. 18 avr. 2020 à 05:01, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hi Gilles, > > I like that idea. I'm picturing that as something that could happen after the > first beta release. Here is my current roadmap (of sorts): > > > 1. Wrap up a few issues (GEOMETRY-92, 93,

[Geometry] CSG?

2020-04-17 Thread Gilles Sadowski
art with 1. how to define "primitive" shapes, 2. how to combine them (CSG), 3. how to transform them, 4. how to load/save them, and how those "models" might be different from those created programmatically (e.g. "mesh" vs "BSP tree"). WDYT? Best, Gilles [1]

Re: suggest adding cache for .m2 folders into travis-ci for commons project.

2020-04-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Ddoclint=all > > we can easily change it to > > language: java > > cache: > directories: > - "$HOME/.m2" I tried it for "Commons Statistics" and the last build (#93) was ~20% faster than the fastest of all recent builds.[1] Thanks for the suggestion

Re: [Statistics] Beta release

2020-04-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-04-12 20:23 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert : > >> On 12 Apr 2020, at 15:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >>> [...] >>> >>> I propose to release version >>>0.1-beta1 >>> of "Commons Statistics", as pa

Re: [Statistics] Beta release

2020-04-12 Thread Gilles Sadowski
with having released version 1.0-beta1 of "Commons Numbers", where there is no room for changing the version number. Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [numbers] Fraction

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 23:20, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 9 Apr 2020, at 21:36, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 22:20, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 9 Apr 2020, at 16:32, G

Re: [numbers] Fraction

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 22:20, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 9 Apr 2020, at 16:32, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > > > > >> Given this I am thinking that using ZERO when possible is a better > >> option and avoid 0 / -1. > > &

Re: [numbers] Fraction

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 16:48, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 09/04/2020 14:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 14:09, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> On 09/04/2020 12:04, Alex Herbert wrote: > >>>>> So if we are

Re: [numbers] Fraction

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le jeu. 9 avr. 2020 à 14:09, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 09/04/2020 12:04, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > >>> > >>> So if we are to support 0/-1 then I will add this to the standard test > >>> cases to make sure it is correctly implemented. > > So I did this. No major functionality failures. > >

Re: [numbers] Fraction

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-04-09 12:33 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert : > > On 09/04/2020 10:54, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> Hi. >> >> 2020-04-09 11:28 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert : >>> Two oddities in fraction: >>> >>> 1. Zero can be represented as 0 / 1 or 0 / -1 >>> &g

Re: [numbers] Fraction

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
m any "cast" to "double" that could be invalid. > Note: The methods are present in the CM 3.6 version of BigFraction but > Fraction did not have any pow methods. A lot of fixes and improvements were brought in by Heinrich Bohne a few months ago. [IIRC, some issues which he h

Re: [Geometry][Math] Equivalent of CM's "RotationConvention"

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
the few classes that remain in the "o.a.c.m.geometry" package seems like a pointless exercise. I'd just remove it all (cf. other thread). WDYT? Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1302 >>> [...] -

[Math][Geometry] Ditch reliquate of "geometry" package in CM?

2020-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
mons.math4.geometry.euclidean.threed and provide a "FieldRotation" functionality. It is doubtful that these classes will ever be useful to users of the next major release of CM. Any objections to deleting them? Regards, Gilles [1] https://markmail.org/message/psos76g5mzt2rzhz [2] https://gitbox.

Re: [crypto] Help getting new release of commons-crypto?

2020-04-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. 2020-04-09 1:15 UTC+02:00, Alex Remily : > I guess we're both in the same boat. Did you try and ping the people[1] (or their respective project[2]) who contributed to that component? Regards, Gilles [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-crypto/team-list.html [2] ht

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction + Fraction updates

2020-04-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 8 avr. 2020 à 15:58, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 08/04/2020 14:08, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mer. 8 avr. 2020 à 14:26, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> On 08/04/2020 00:36, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> 2020-04-07 23:01 UTC

Re: [Geometry][Math] Equivalent of CM's "RotationConvention"

2020-04-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > > I would encourage removing RotationConvention without replacing it. But, I > still don't think I'm quite getting what you're saying. Do you have an > example? I wonder how to replace "RotationConvention" usage in class "FieldRotation".

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction + Fraction updates

2020-04-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 8 avr. 2020 à 14:26, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 08/04/2020 00:36, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > 2020-04-07 23:01 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert : > >> > >>> On 7 Apr 2020, at 17:47, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> > >>> Le mar

Re: [numbers] Release 1.0-beta1 Follow-Up

2020-04-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
gt; or wait until the full 1.0 release? I figure out that it would be confusing if there are subsequent beta releases: All resolved issues up to now will appear in every one of them, thus hiding (or making it more difficult to follow) progress. Best, Gilles --

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction + Fraction updates

2020-04-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
2020-04-07 23:01 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert : > > >> On 7 Apr 2020, at 17:47, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> >> Le mar. 7 avr. 2020 à 14:54, Alex Herbert > <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >>> >>> On 07/04/2020 13:43, Alex Herber

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction

2020-04-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
denominator. Given this context it does make > more sense to have the lexical order for numerator over denominator as a / b > rather than b / a. + 1 Regards, Gilles [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=blob;f=src/changes/changes.xml;h=e6c2c8a7b4f057cf4533d44e17b

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction + Fraction updates

2020-04-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Code() { > return 37 * (37 * 17 + numerator) + denominator; > } Strange that the constant 37 * 17 was not pre-computed. ;-) > > to > > public int hashCode() { > return 31 * (31 + numerator) + denominator; > } +0 Gilles -

Re: [Geometry][Math] Equivalent of CM's "RotationConvention"

2020-04-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le mar. 7 avr. 2020 à 03:18, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hi Gilles, > > I removed the RotationConvention enum from commons-geometry because it was > more confusing than useful. Instead, I specified [1] that commons-geometry > uses "active rotations&quo

[Geometry][Math] Equivalent of CM's "RotationConvention"

2020-04-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Is there a way to replace an argument of CM's type "RotationConvention"[1] with a type from [Geometry]? Thanks, Gilles [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-math.git;a=blob;f=src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math4/geometry/euclidean/threed/RotationConvent

Re: [numbers] Continued Fraction

2020-04-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
y and there isn't any promise whatsoever about compatibility. Users who adapt their codes would certainly do so with minimal care. IIRC, similar fixes were done for the name and/or order of the arguments for some of the distribution classes in [Statistics]. Gilles > > Alex >

[Geometry] Build fails on Jenkins

2020-04-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. All build have been failing[1], due to CheckStyle checking a file which it shouldn't. Regards, Gilles [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Commons/job/commons-geometry/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

[All] Enabling "javac" options

2020-04-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Many components rely on the configuration set up in CP for running the Java compiler. How can one specify command line arguments (to "mvn") so that they are passed to "javac"?[1] [Of course, the idea is to *not* revert to duplicating the "" section of the compone

[Statistics] Beta release

2020-04-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. I propose to release version 0.1-beta1 of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency requirements for a beta release of the next major version of "Commons Math". Any objections? Regards, Gilles

Re: [commons-numbers] 04/09: Remove a branch from equals tests with NaN.

2020-04-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le dim. 5 avr. 2020 à 00:36, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 4 Apr 2020, at 22:35, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > Le sam. 4 avr. 2020 à 23:16, > <mailto:aherb...@apache.org>> a écrit : > >> > >&g

Re: [commons-numbers] 04/09: Remove a branch from equals tests with NaN.

2020-04-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
hould be balanced with the resulting code reduced (IMO) readability. Best, Gilles > --- > .../main/java/org/apache/commons/numbers/core/Precision.java | 12 > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git > a/commons-numbers-core/src/main/java/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Numbers (full distribution) 1.0-beta1 based on RC1

2020-04-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ontains items > that relate to the module. This is useful but the site generation takes the > same amount of time because generation of a full Jira report or partial > report takes the same time. It also requi

[Result][Vote] Format of "git" tags

2020-04-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. A common convention for naming tags (for releases and release candidates) has been adopted. "Option 2" gathered the following votes: +1 from Rob, Matt, Gary, Bruno and Bernd +0 from Stefan. Thanks, Gilles Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 13:02, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :

Re: [Vote] Format of "git" tags

2020-04-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 13:32, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > On 2020-04-01, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Alternatives (using the yet-to-be-created tag for the release > > candidate of the first beta version of [Numbers] as an example): > > > [ ] Option 1: NUMBERS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Numbers (full distribution) 1.0-beta1 based on RC1

2020-04-03 Thread Gilles Sadowski
t; You can record the Maven and Java version produced by -V in your VOTE reply. > To gather OS information from a command line: > Windows: ver > Linux: uname -a > > 5) Build the site for a single module project > > Note: Some plugins require the components

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-04-02 Thread Gilles Sadowski
OTICE > file names and some changes to Complex). Should I pull those into the release? Yes. The least discrepancy with "master", the better. Thanks, Gilles >>>> [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: d

Re: [commons-numbers] 02/08: Added Boost license for derived works in Complex.

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 17:22, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 01/04/2020 15:51, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 16:27, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> On 01/04/2020 14:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>>

Re: [commons-numbers] 02/08: Added Boost license for derived works in Complex.

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 15:09, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 01/04/2020 13:10, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 12:58, a écrit : > >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > >> &

Re: [Vote] Format of "git" tags

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:43 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le mer. 1 avr. 2020 à 14:33, Rob Tompkins > <mailto:chtom...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Apr 1, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > &

Re: [Vote] Format of "git" tags

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ak "internal". Is there any interest in having failed attempts made read-only? The "history" is kept through the ML archives (the "[Vote]" thread and its corresponding tag/commit). Gilles > I have, at times, found the need to delete a tag due to mistakes on my part.

Re: [commons-numbers] 02/08: Added Boost license for derived works in Complex.

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
| 44 > ++ My understanding of [1] is that these texts must go to the NOTICE file(s). Side-note: Files "LICENCE.txt" and "NOTICE.txt" should be renamed (cf. NUMBERS-146). Best, Gilles [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > ..

Re: [Vote] Format of "git" tags

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
defined? > Do you plan on renaming existing tags? At first sight, that does not seem wise: It will make many vote threads contain dangling references. Gilles > > Gary > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 07:02 Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > This

[Vote] Format of "git" tags

2020-04-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
3: commons-numbers_v1.0-beta1_rc1 Please give your choice of the format that should be used from now on. Thanks, Gilles [1] https://markmail.org/message/n457skstbxbirvhp [2] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Basics-Tagging [3] https://git-scm.com/docs

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:55, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:51 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 22:30, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > > > Why not dropping the red

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
it first? > > Thus: > > rc1_v1.0-beta1 > > > > The argument for having the component name in the tag name is that when you > clone the repo, you get a 'nice' directory name by default. > Convincing. So, I

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 17:24, sebb a écrit : > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit > > : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > > > wrot

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > > >

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > &

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-31 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb a écrit : > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > a écrit : > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ER_1_0_BETA1_RCX tag > pattern going forward? IMHO, no harm done by removing. Can someone confirm? Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [poll] Beta versions should be labeled "Beta", not "B".

2020-03-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:49, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > +1 for "beta". +1 Gilles > > -Matt > > From: Rob Tompkins > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [poll] Beta vers

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 17:27, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hi. > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 16:19, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > The issue I saw with the site [1] was that the text under the Releases > > section says "There is no offcial release ye

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
erver. I thought I had added it but > apparently it didn't work. Never encountered this issue... Did you register your key at https://id.apache.org/ ? Regards, Gilles > > [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 15:38, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hello. > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 15:06, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > I made it all the way up to the vote email and then realized that the site > > index page does not have a link to

Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal

2020-03-30 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ot sure what problem you are referring to. [Perhaps RC1 is fine (?).] Regards, Gilles > > -Matt > > From: Alex Herbert > Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 9:15 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [numbers] 1.0-B1 Release Proposal >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.10 based on RC1

2020-03-27 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ng-3.10-RC1 commons-lang-3.10-RC1 Builds from source on Linux using $ mvn clean package within the above check-out branch: * JDK 8: OK * JDK 9: OK * JDK 10: OK * JDK 11: ~OK ---CUT--- [WARNING] Javadoc Warnings [WARNING] /home/gilles/devel/java/apache/commons-lang/commons-lang-3.10-RC1/sr

Re: [numbers] Release?

2020-03-25 Thread Gilles Sadowski
guide to speak > of. There is a JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NUMBERS/issues/NUMBERS-70 but concrete attempts did not go very far... > Is this something that needs to be added before the beta release? It can always be added later. Also, most codes are fairly self-docum

Re: Re: [math] Discuss: New feature MiniBatchKMeansClusterer

2020-03-25 Thread Gilles Sadowski
e "initialization". Please submit a PR. > > > >> Show we make the API simple or rich? > > > >I'd keep it simple until we fix the (IMHO) more important > >issues of thread-safety and sparse data. > > Some Personal opinion about "Sparse data&

Re: Re: [math] Discuss: New feature MiniBatchKMeansClusterer

2020-03-25 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ring results? > Show we make the API simple or rich? I'd keep it simple until we fix the (IMHO) more important issues of thread-safety and sparse data. >> >>> public boolean isUseKMeansPlusPlus() {return this.useKMeansPlusPlus;} >> >>

Re: [numbers] Release?

2020-03-24 Thread Gilles Sadowski
ing on > this soon. Since we know that ComplexUtils will not make to the official release (because Alex's proposal is convincingly better), I'd remove that module from the release branch. Thank ou for stepping up, Gilles >>> [...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [math] Discuss: New feature MiniBatchKMeansClusterer

2020-03-24 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Also, in the current implementation of "KMeansPlusPlusClusterer", the initialization is not configurable ("KMeansPlusPlusCentroidInitializer"). Perhaps we don't want to depart from the original (?) algorithm; if so, the new constructor could be made p

Re: [math] Discuss: New feature MiniBatchKMeansClusterer

2020-03-22 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Tao. I've merged PR #128 but please see my comment on the JIRA page.[1] Thanks for your interest in improving the library, Gilles [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1509?focusedCommentId=17064306=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17064306

Re: [math]Discussion: How to move out "EmptyClusterStrategy" from KMeansPlusPlusClusterer

2020-03-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. 2020-03-21 4:02 UTC+01:00, chentao...@qq.com : > Hi, > >>2020-03-21 2:59 UTC+01:00, chentao...@qq.com : >>> Hi, >>> >>>>Le ven. 20 mars 2020 à 04:47, chentao...@qq.com a >>>> écrit >>>> : >>>>> >>&

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >