When I start JOSM I get a few warnings about missing plugins:
2020-07-04 10:04:03.485 WARNING: Missing plugin main version in plugin
annotation-tester
2020-07-04 10:04:03.496 WARNING: Missing plugin main version in plugin
nearclick
2020-07-04 10:04:03.499 WARNING: Missing plugin main version in
Simon
Am 26.05.2020 um 10:42 schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2020-05-26 10:15, Paul Norman via dev wrote:
On 2020-05-25 1:15 a.m., Maarten Deen wrote:
Still, it looks to be a very simplified subset of the complete data.
So I'd be interested to see how this works on a full dataset.
No, it has the full d
On 2020-05-26 10:15, Paul Norman via dev wrote:
On 2020-05-25 1:15 a.m., Maarten Deen wrote:
Still, it looks to be a very simplified subset of the complete data.
So I'd be interested to see how this works on a full dataset.
No, it has the full data except for admin boundaries and bay/straight
On 2020-05-26 06:24, Yves wrote:
Le 26 mai 2020 03:58:50 GMT+02:00, Paul Norman via dev
a écrit :
Performance with normal basemaps and small stylesheets should be
acceptable.
Reading this, I don't think I understand. However it makes me think of
a raster basemap plus a vector overlay for
On 2020-05-25 09:59, Paul Norman via dev wrote:
On 2020-05-24 10:26 p.m., Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Thank you for making this, it looks like a lot of work!
These client-side vector tiles at z8?
(https://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/cartographic/mapbox-gl.html)
My laptop (2015 Macbook Pro, 16
Redaction_id will have bearing on the redaction bot
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMF_Redaction_Bot
Background: when OSM changed to ODbl, all changes made by people who did
not agree had to be redacted.
visible in the changeset will be the same as for node/way/relation: you
can
On 2019-11-08 17:04, Bart Smienk wrote:
Hi,
I've found out my OSM Tile Server has stopped updating and osm2pgsql
(v1.2) gives off the following error:
DB writer thread failed due to ERROR: result COPY_END for
planet_osm_line failed: ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "-"
CONTEXT: COPY
On 2019-05-29 11:56, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2019-05-29 11:23, Vijaya Nand wrote:
Dear sir,
I am using a gmap.net [1] control to use OSM but suddent it started
giving 403 error. Please suggest.
Going to gmap.org
gmap.net of course.
Maarten
On 2019-05-29 11:23, Vijaya Nand wrote:
Dear sir,
I am using a gmap.net [1] control to use OSM but suddent it started
giving 403 error. Please suggest.
Going to gmap.org redirects me to https://www.cggh.org/
Is it related to https://github.com/radioman/greatmaps ? Maybe the
domain was
On 2019-01-07 16:46, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hola Maarten
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 08:11:20AM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote:
I have seen this also and have filed a bug for it in the past, but
that got
closed because it was not reproducible.
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/16403
Circumstances
I have seen this also and have filed a bug for it in the past, but that
got closed because it was not reproducible.
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/16403
Circumstances to create it included fast succession of entering keys,
like what Florian is describing. At a certain point I could not
I have taken the liberty to remove these ways and all relations that
became empty because of deleting them.
Maarten
On 2018-08-27 12:57, Jo wrote:
I found that quite intriguing... so I went to download. It turns out
that this way (with just a name tag, nothing else, located in a small
town 18
And the ways that are in the bad relations are bogus too. A lot of
relations only have way 482554372 and 496296681 in them, both ways with
no tags but the name.
My guess for the existance of these ways is they were split of from a
way "Ankara Otobüs Hatları Çalışması", where left somewhere out
eef Maarten Deen :
I don't know if other people notice this too, but the new version of
JOSM (14163) is noticably more shluggish than the previous version.
Moving nodes is not fluent but jerky. And after some time it just
stops
responding.
It starts with the same symptoms as I mentioned in bug 16
I don't know if other people notice this too, but the new version of
JOSM (14163) is noticably more shluggish than the previous version.
Moving nodes is not fluent but jerky. And after some time it just stops
responding.
It starts with the same symptoms as I mentioned in bug 16403 [1] and
then
I assume the anonymouse notes have been deleted, since the notes that
are now visible are not anonymouse.
Regards,
Maarten
On 2018-07-20 20:21, Johnparis wrote:
When I click on the samples I get full notes. Perhaps there was a
database hiccup?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 18:29 Andrew Hain
wrote:
The keepright URL for JOSM from issues like those at [1] does not work
for me. I am using firefox 60.0.1 64bit on Windows 7. The URL is
something like [2]
Before I open an issue with this in the keepright github I'd like to
find out why this does not work. JOSM is supposed to listen to port
to the front of the relation but are not sorted in order. Also not
on repeat sort tries.
Maarten
2017-07-20 7:08 GMT+02:00 Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>:
On 2017-07-19 23:03, Jo wrote:
In v2 of the PT scheme they are indeed sorted in the order the
vehicle
passes them. They are also the first
On 2017-07-19 23:03, Jo wrote:
In v2 of the PT scheme they are indeed sorted in the order the vehicle
passes them. They are also the first block in the route relation,
In JOSM at least you have to manually sort the stops in the correct
order. JOSM will take care to order stop and platform
On 2017-03-30 09:36, Alex K wrote:
@Jo: Wow, that’s impressive! How did the community manage to tag
every house?!?
In the Netherlands the basic cadastre information regarding shapes and
addresses of buildings is freely available and has been imported into
OSM and is maintained on ad hoc
On 2017-03-29 10:20, Tom Hughes wrote:
Rather they are just defined by a list of addresses, being a set of
addresses that are a convenient group to deliver to.
Now obviously you can draw any number of shapes around those addresses
but none of those shapes is in any way an official or
On 2016-08-12 13:14, Paul Norman wrote:
The usage policy for tile.openstreetmap.org requires that users send a
valid user-agent[1], or, in the case of a web browser, a HTTP Referer.
Ops are looking into automatically rate limiting clients violating this
part of the policy.[2]
I have wondered
On 2016-03-26 20:59, Steve Coast wrote:
Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty
good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack.
Maybe I'm living under a rock, but I only know Slack as a short for
Slackware, a Linux distribution.
What is this and why do I need
On 2015-11-01 18:09, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) wrote:
Hi all,
I have been gathering thoughts from the talk-gb list and my main
concern now is how the tertiary roads are shown, especially in
countries where people map roads according to quality and hierarchy
(and there are more than one). In
On 2015-11-02 10:30, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 11/02/2015 09:40 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
I agree that the abandonging of the blue for motorways is a bad
choice.
It is not only a british color, motorways are signalled in blue also
in
lots of other countries in europe.
I find it strange
On 2015-10-30 11:53, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
One of the advantages of the the vector-based map would be the
multilingualism.
For instance at the moment the OSM map of the Middle East is basically
useless for me as I do not know the Arabic alphabet yet. But as far as
I understand and as I heard
ee for e.g. Afghanistan) and when to show
name.
I realize that mobile hardware is not enough advanced for that yet and
vector-based technology is only in an development stage.
brgds
Oleksiy
On 30.10.2015 12:06, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2015-10-30 11:53, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
One of the
That does not work in JOSM either. I get the error "Failed to download
data. Its format is either unsupported, ill-formed, and/or inconsistent.
Details (untranslated): runtime error: Query run out of memory in
"recurse" at line 1 using about 659 MB of RAM."
Regards,
Maarten
The JOSM validator used to use the full processor when running. I've
updated to version 8800 and now it doesn't anymore. It stays at about
17% on my dual-cores system, so that's about 34% of one core. I can not
imagine that the checking process is not CPU-bound anymore, what would
it need
On 2015-09-10 00:20, Vincent Privat wrote:
We're reaching the limit of the 100Gb disk capacity.
Some numbers:
- www/download: 16 Gb
- www/apt: 6 Gb
- backup: 25 Gb
- jenkins/jobs: 29 Gb, as below
- JOSM: 21 Gb
- Plugins: 6 Gb
I freed some space and reduced the number of jenkins jobs for:
At some point JOSM was changed so that at high zooms nodes don't display
their icons anymore but are just a dot that gets smaller the further you
zoom out.
Is this configurable? I am noticing now that for some purposes I always
want the configured icon to display.
Regards,
Maarten
I had a similar problem last month when one relation seemed to block the
upload of changes in JOSM [1]. Now again. I've created a relation, added
some items to it and I am trying to upload it. For about an hour now the
Uploading data for layer dialog is open, the slider goes back and
forth but
On 2014-11-27 00:01, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
There is some software, better or worse that is able to find routes
from point A to point B.
But is there any tool capable of finding interesting trips starting in
some selected place,
that returns to the point of origin after going through some
On 2014-07-07 13:36, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014, Maarten Deen wrote:
I opened JOSM (webstart) and it came with a question to install a
certification authority for localhost with a sha1 thumbprint
I have no knowledge of having generated a sha1 thumbprint on my
windows computer, so
On 2014-07-08 10:26, Vincent Privat wrote:
Hi,
As said this is a required mechanism to let you use Remote Control in
https (for example from Edit button on main OSM website, when
browsed in HTTPS).
See https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10033 [1] for explanations
and progress update (currently
I opened JOSM (webstart) and it came with a question to install a
certification authority for localhost with a sha1 thumbprint
I have no knowledge of having generated a sha1 thumbprint on my windows
computer, so I am interested to know how JOSM can ask this.
I also don't know why JOSM needs
On 2014-05-29 13:33, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Vincent Privat wrote:
I dropped the support of 0.5 in the general code cleanup process.
Didn't think it was worth keeping 5 years after release of API 0.6...
Feel
free to revert r7013 if you think it's really important.
I've
I was a bit surprised to notice that my saved osm files would not get
loaded anymore. Then I saw in the changelog that v0.5 format was
dropped. It would have been more graceful to have josm save v0.5 osm
files as v0.6 as soon as that was implemented. This is a tip for when
the version goes to
On 2013-12-09 15:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
nobody? My main question is: has caching been modified compared to what
is
written in the cited article in the wiki?
If a key is not present in the advanced preferences, you can always add
it. No idea if it is used or not.
Maybe a sidenote,
On 2013-11-27 11:58, Minh Nguyen wrote:
On 23:12 2013-11-26, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:46:47PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
So the relation between the east--west and north--south member roles
is equivalent to the relation between forward--backward.
Because the
On 2013-10-23 22:24, AccessibilityGuide wrote:
Hi
I have the following requirement for a new software project:
Given a way, for example a hiking route, I'd like to attach some
attributes to this way. But the attributes should not apply to the
entire way but only a section of the way. The
On 2013-10-14 10:34, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
Hello,
while the weekend I stumbled accross the old Elbe tunnel at Hamburg
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Pauli-Elbtunnel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbe_Tunnel_%281911%29
and how it is rendered on the main OSM site (mapnik style):
On 2013-10-15 04:51, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
On 14.10.2013 10:52, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2013-10-14 10:34, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
Hello,
while the weekend I stumbled accross the old Elbe tunnel at Hamburg
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Pauli-Elbtunnel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
On 2013-09-11 09:21, Florian Lohoff wrote:
But i wouldnt be worried - There will be a day where OSM will be THE
ONLY important map provider. Its economically not possible for Nokia
and TomTom to get the same map detail level as we do. So they'll
highlight the crowd nature of OSM and try to
On 2013-08-28 13:02, Peter K wrote:
Hi there,
I know that this is highly subjective: But why has the default map
style to be that ugly? I don't mean it as a rant, I know how difficult
it is to create something like this. I only say that it is 'ugly'
because I know there are a lot better and
Very nice that the main map now shows a link as standard, but why does
the format have to be changed? Now JOSM needs to be changed because it
does not recognise this type of link.
What was wrong with the old lat= and lon= style? From this link I can
not see what the latitude and longitude is. I
On 2013-08-08 09:08, Maarten Deen wrote:
Very nice that the main map now shows a link as standard, but why does
the format have to be changed? Now JOSM needs to be changed because it
does not recognise this type of link.
What was wrong with the old lat= and lon= style? From this link I can
of the new hash-format, but probably even there is a solution
possible.
regards
Peter
Am 08.08.2013 09:16, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-08-08 09:08, Maarten Deen wrote:
Very nice that the main map now shows a link as standard, but why does
the format have to be changed? Now JOSM needs to be changed
On 2013-08-08 17:47, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
What planet are you on?
That level of abuse is _completely_ unwarranted. I think you owe Tom an
apology.
I have read my command again and after Tom's hyperbole that I claim you
did a bad thing entirely I see no reason
On 2013-08-08 19:33, Tom MacWright wrote:
Tom's hyperbole that I claim you did a bad thing entirely
I was referring to:
I'm sorry, but IMHO this is yet another step backward.
'Yet another step backward', outside of the expression two steps
forward, another step back means 'a bad thing in
On 2013-07-24 10:39, Andy Robinson wrote:
I'm seeing this problem in JOSM 6060. To replicate try:
FWIW, I was also using JOSM 6060. The webstart version.
Regards,
Maarten
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
On 2013-07-24 04:57, Paul Norman wrote:
Where it might run into problems is if there is a scenario where a user
uploads
changes and then immediately requests the latest version from the API.
In
this
scenario my service would of transparently proxied the main API for the
upload
then answered
On 2013-06-14 12:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
at the FOSSGIS conference, someone said in a presentation that the
user experience in OSM could be improved if the editor were to give a
simple thank you message after you have uploaded something. Thank
yo for contributing to OpenStreetMap or so.
On 2013-05-23 14:48, Jingmin Chen wrote:
I currently have access to 2 years, 20,000 taxi vehicles GPS trace
(30sec interval) of a large city in China. The OSM data quality of
that city is really bad. But uploading the raw GPS trace might have
legal issues. Is it possible to process the data to
On 5-5-2013 20:13, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2013-05-05 15:38, Christian Müller wrote:
Hi,
have a look at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2012-May/024947.html
https://github.com/podolsir/osmosis-simplifyways
That doesn't want to work for me. I have the latest germany file and
when
Hi,
is there a tool already existing that can simplify ways in an .osm file?
What I'm looking for is something that removes all intermediate nodes from a
way, as long as they are not used in another way.
Example:
way id=1
nd ref=1/
nd ref=2/
nd ref=3/
nd
, schrieb Maarten Deen:
Hi,
is there a tool already existing that can simplify ways in an .osm
file?
What I'm looking for is something that removes all intermediate nodes
from a way, as long as they are not used in another way.
Example:
way id=1
nd ref=1/
nd ref=2/
nd ref=3/
nd ref=4
On 2012-11-08 08:14, Jo wrote:
Hi,
I want to find all bus stops along a side of the road. So I'm looking
for
functions in JOSM to:
Define a rectangle a few meters to one side of the (section of a)
road.
Get all nodes within this rectangle as a list.
or:
Define a polygon with the way as
Is it possible to make an option for the validator so that you can
choose between validating only touched objects and all objects?
Then put it default on only touched objects for new installations so
that newbies only see the errors on objects they actually touched.
Regards,
Maarten
My apologies for ranting, but please do not change shortcuts that were in use
for I-know-not-how long. I just downloaded rev 5181 and found that the d key
did not work. Someone decided that it should be the delete key.
I can understand the reasoning. But do not decide for the whole community
On 30-4-2012 18:46, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Maarten Deen wrote:
To continue my rant: N used to be the method to place one node only.
That seems to have disappeared too. It looks like I now have to start
drawing a way with A and then press escape to end drawing the way so I
can
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Maarten Deen wrote:
'N' was simply a secondary key for 'A' for a very long time now. It had
exactly same function and thus has been removed. To place a single node
use SHIFT + Click or ESC and afterwards Click.
N had not the same function. A starts
On 2012-04-03 12:55, Simon Legner wrote:
Hi!
On 03/04/12 13:47, Maarten Deen wrote:
I was able to create this page without a hitch:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mdeen/josm
It's not really pretty though. Was this what you designed?
It was intended for the JOSM Wiki:
http
Am 02.10.2011 02:31, schrieb Iván Sánchez Ortega:
Unable to load library 'Advapi32.so': libAdvapi32.so: cannot open shared
object file
As I understand, this plugin uses the VLCJ libraries for playing the video,
and they seem to be missing. I visited the project page, and downloaded them,
but
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:38:02 +0100, Andrew Ayre wrote:
With my 766MB change file the original merge command that I posted
takes
106 minutes.
By using Jochen's merge command with buffers and the same change file
it
now takes 58 minutes!
I knew about the possibility of buffers but I never
I'm just trying to upload some changes made in Potlatch 2 and after
entering the changesetcommet I get a popup screen that asks me username
and password: A username and password are being requested by
http://www.openstreetmap.org. The site says: Web Password
I entered my email and password I
After the fix early this month Nominatim is again showing incorrect results:
E.g. Maasbree (province Limburg, country the Netherlands) is showing
Stad Maasbree, Kreis Heinsberg, België
Dorp Maasbree, Kreis Heinsberg, 5993, België
Regards,
Maarten
Mitja Kleider wrote:
Hi Antoine,
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:11:11 +0100, Antoine Pichon
antoine.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I am building an application that needs to access osm poi database. Ex
: Extract all the banks (or any orther amenity) of a given area. I
didn't find this possibility (amenity
Mitja, your From: mi...@kleider.name is malformed.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:46:12 +0100, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Can you elaborate on how to do bbox queries with this?
Like this:
http://78.47.225.27/tag/amenity/bank/all/ids.json?bbox
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:01:14 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Congratulations Iván.
That's really a monster, it weights 544 kg ;-)
If you go for power to weight ratio, than this machine doesn't perform
too well ;)
But joking aside, also in real terms it is not a superfast machine. A
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:02:00 +0100, l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Grant Slater wrote:
People contacting you is exceptional AFAIK.
I've received the exact same message. It's only about the oh 5th
time
or so someone has asked me to accept the ODbL.
Same here. Received today, so I guess it's the
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 04/12/10 09:27, Wyo wrote:
The http://www.openstreetmap.org/?relation=1273572; doesn't show any
visible feedback when its not working like now. Nothing is worse than
not giving any feedback. The user simply doesn't know what's going on.
The loading status display I asked
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 04/12/10 10:33, Maarten Deen wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
Well if we knew the cause of the failure then we'd fix it and there
wouldn't be a failure...
But there is a problem then? I was just making a mail to the talk list
that downloading full relations does not work (GET
I was making a tool for myself and was downloading data from the API and saw
that the data was binary data. On closer inspection it was gzipped.
The general information in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6 talks
about that the payload may be compressed, but I'm not sure what is meant
On 5-11-2010 17:21, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
The lack of auto-complete or search suggestions like you see in for
example Google (maps) and the OSM wiki search box has been bugging me
for a while. So I created a prototype based on the Nominatim API and the
Google Closure JS framework.
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:21:56 +0100, Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net
wrote:
(re-added CC to list)
Thanks for the interesting discussion. I know it's a astonishingly
borderless topic (see [1]).
What I still have in mind is to be able to produce a map with local
names (i.e. for preserving
I downloaded a relation which contains a lot of relations. So I selected them
all and did download members.
These were some 140 relations.
The downloading went fast until all of a sudden it stopped. This was after about
84 relations.
So I pressed cancel, expecting the downloaded relations to be
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:31, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice! When did this happen? I only realized that the OSM Wiki was using the
new skin just now. :-)
It was recently upgraded to MediaWiki 1.16, then the skin settings for
logged-in users
Grant Slater wrote:
On 7 August 2010 15:48, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Is this a server problem? Is the server overloaded or is there an issue
downloading bboxes?
Should be back to speed now.
Is it is^H^H was.
There is an issue between the apache load balancer and the backend
For some days now I'm experiencing very long load times when I try to load data
with a bbox, both in JOSM and in a webrowser. Load times of multiple minutes are
quite common and even having to wait 5 minutes and then JOSM loads no data at
all, but also gives out no error message (also not in
The API seems very slow today, but only in downloading objects.
Just getting a single node or way takes minutes, but uploading is fast.
Maarten
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Is anyone using the routing plugin in JOSM? I'm trying it, but it doesn't seem
to work. I can't get it to select any nodes.
According to the docs I should have the routing layer selected, and then use the
add destination button to click near a node.
But at that point, nothing happens.
Am I
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:32:51 +0200, Rodolphe Quiedeville
rodol...@quiedeville.org wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 20:58, Rodolphe Quiedeville
rodol...@quiedeville.org wrote:
Jeffrey Warren a écrit :
Hi all - i'm writing about OSM and was wondering if I could
It seems to me that the history function in Potlatch (shortcut key H) has
a bug.
Example: way 6313107, which is the southern part of the railway at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=50.81lon=5.717638zoom=18.
When I view the history in Potlatch, it tells me the previous version is
from
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:19:43 +0100, Andreas Höschler
ahoe...@smartsoft.de wrote:
Hi John,
For that we need some kind of TCP-based XML interface so that we could
send a track in some XML format to a TCP socket and get back the IDs
assigned to objects by the public OSM database server. Only
I wanted to submit a ticket to trac, but at submitting I received this error:
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/trac/web/main.py, line 406, in
dispatch_request
dispatcher.dispatch(req)
File
Does anyone have an idea (or is there already a routine) how to split a line of
an osm file in its respective keys and values?
I've tried a few things, but I'm not fluent in perl. My problem at the moment
is
that splitting a line on the space character seems logical, but you run into
problems
I'm using osmosis 0.31.2 to insert some data (from XAPI) in a mysql database
and
I get the error
Cannot add or update a child row: a foreign key constraint fails
(`osm06/nodes`,
CONSTRAINT `nodes_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`changeset_id`) REFERENCES `changesets`
(`id`))
I'm trying to load two osm
Is there an explanation why Mapnik renders the unclassified road on top of
the primary road in this example?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.35217lon=6.01257zoom=17layers=B000FTF
I tried to hint to Mapnik that the unclassified road should not be
rendered over the primary by adding a
The possibility exists to see the latest version of a node/way/relation,
or the full history. Is there a way to see a specific version of a
node/way/relation?
I'm asking this because trying to look at the history of objects with a
lot of members and a lot of versions is not working at all. I've
to
version 124?
Regards,
Maarten
On 9 Oct 2009, at 10:48, Maarten Deen wrote:
The possibility exists to see the latest version of a node/way/
relation,
or the full history. Is there a way to see a specific version of a
node/way/relation?
I'm asking this because trying to look at the history
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:51:43 +0200, Etienne Chové ch...@crans.org wrote:
Maarten Deen a écrit :
Now, is there a possibility (or a tool) to revert relation 73447 to
version 124?
1. open in your browser :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/73447/124
2. in a other tab open
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:15:24 -0700 (PDT), Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Marc Schütz wrote:
somehow a user managed to create empty tags on a node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/513414350/history
Is this a bug or a feature?
I don't know, but if you can provide steps
See this route:
http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=55.799677lng=37.995207zoom=18directions=55.79985477863301,37.994123697280884,55.80008695307262,37.995625734329224travel=carstyleId=1
Why does Cloudmade not route straight on? There is a turn restriction on the
connecting node (relation 146163),
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Claudius Henrichs claudius.h at gmx.de
wrote:
I've set up a wiki page [1] with some impressive routing results on OSM
data compared to Google. For example we can already route from Teheran,
Iran to Lisbon, Portugal and to New Delhi, India. Or you can hail a
Karl Guggisberg wrote:
This is probably something that the OSM editors should warn users about
when they try to create such a relation.
JOSM doesn't allow to create recursive relations, but it accepts them when
they are present in the data.
JOSM has in the past accepted recursive relations
There is a sort button in the relation editor. It's not clear to me what it
sorts on. It is not alphabeticaly, it is not on id, not on number of nodes.
What does it sort on?
Regards,
Maarten
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
I admit I haven't used relations in a while, so I'm quite surprised to see that
JOSM now adds a way to a relation again if it was already in the relation.
Previously, ways that were already in a relation did not get added again.
I this an intentional change?
So now I've ended up with a relation
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Maarten Deen wrote:
I admit I haven't used relations in a while, so I'm quite surprised to see
that
JOSM now adds a way to a relation again if it was already in the relation.
Previously, ways that were already in a relation did not get added again.
I
The 'r' key (repeat last attributes) in Potlatch overwrites all attributes of
a way or node with the ones from the previous way or node (excluding name/ref
if you use shift-R).
Is that intentional? If so, I would like to make a case for a repeat last
addition of attributes function.
E.g. if I add
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
