Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet Wikipedia page

Am Samstag, 17. Dezember 2011, 17:36:48 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Friday 16 Dec 2011 05:44:06 Ian Clarke wrote: > > There are some issues raised at the top of Freenet's wikipedia page: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet > > > > It would be good if we could address some of these shortco

[freenet-dev] [RFC] Allow more people to release a Freenet build

Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > > I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO > > INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails. > > Do we have a build

Re: [freenet-dev] [RFC] Allow more people to release a Freenet build

Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > > I’m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO > > INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what “make a test build” actually entails. > > Do we have a build

[freenet-dev] Offer to help with Windows installer

Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011, 22:21:17 schrieb Jeff Rivett: > Greetings. According to the wiki > (http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Status): "Windows installer - > We could do with a more active maintainer, and we definitely need more > testers (with different windows versions) for it." > > If t

Re: [freenet-dev] Offer to help with Windows installer

Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011, 22:21:17 schrieb Jeff Rivett: > Greetings. According to the wiki > (http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Status): "Windows installer - > We could do with a more active maintainer, and we definitely need more > testers (with different windows versions) for it." > > If th

[freenet-dev] Filesharing application for Freenet

Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > - I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the > > opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons > > (I > > think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are >

Re: [freenet-dev] Filesharing application for Freenet

Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > - I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the > > opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons > > (I > > think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are >

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405

Sounds great! Many Thanks! Am Dienstag, 15. November 2011, 20:03:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405 is now available. Please upgrade. There are many > changes, mostly client layer or FCP or filtering stuff from FMS. > Highlights: - Allow plugins to exempt themselves from the

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405

Sounds great! Many Thanks! Am Dienstag, 15. November 2011, 20:03:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405 is now available. Please upgrade. There are many > changes, mostly client layer or FCP or filtering stuff from FMS. > Highlights: - Allow plugins to exempt themselves from the

[freenet-dev] Filesharing application for Freenet

Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 23:58:13 schrieb Tanya Pyatigorskaya: > Now I am back, and I am happy to be able to continue my work > on my Freenet task. Welcome back! > Since I was out of the day-to-day work in the community for quite a long > period of time, what I need now is to become up to d

Re: [freenet-dev] Filesharing application for Freenet

Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 23:58:13 schrieb Tanya Pyatigorskaya: > Now I am back, and I am happy to be able to continue my work > on my Freenet task. Welcome back! > Since I was out of the day-to-day work in the community for quite a long > period of time, what I need now is to become up to da

[freenet-dev] One click solution

Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011, 20:03:37 schrieb Volodya: > On 10/09/2011 06:34 PM, Dirk Bruere wrote: > > What I am looking for is a one click solution ie someone goes to our > > site, click a link, and then if they approve the installation it all > > goes ahead with a browser icon on the desktop for

Re: [freenet-dev] One click solution

Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011, 20:03:37 schrieb Volodya: > On 10/09/2011 06:34 PM, Dirk Bruere wrote: > > What I am looking for is a one click solution ie someone goes to our > > site, click a link, and then if they approve the installation it all > > goes ahead with a browser icon on the desktop for

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1404 (BIG FIX)

Am Montag, 12. September 2011, 12:38:49 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Thanks for using Freenet, and thanks for not leaving while the bugs get > sorted out. Thank you for sorting out the bugs! And while we?re at it: As I pledged, I just donated 50? of the money I got back because I cannot go to F

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1404 (BIG FIX)

Am Montag, 12. September 2011, 12:38:49 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Thanks for using Freenet, and thanks for not leaving while the bugs get > sorted out. Thank you for sorting out the bugs! And while we’re at it: As I pledged, I just donated 50€ of the money I got back because I cannot go to Filk

[freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Hi, At Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:53:58 +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > > very simple check to see if my understanding is right.

Re: [freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Hi, At Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:53:58 +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > > very simple check to see if my understanding is right.

[freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > very simple check to see if my understanding is right. > > > > Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests, > > the bandwidth l

[freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland amphibian.dyndns.org > > wrote: > > > > WE NEED MORE DATA. > > Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to > fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, how

Re: [freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > very simple check to see if my understanding is right. > > > > Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests, > > the bandwidth l

Re: [freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > > > WE NEED MORE DATA. > > Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to > fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however I'm happy to be wron

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1401

Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011, 17:02:16 schrieb xor: > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:05:59 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I believed I had seriously screwed > > everything up and wasted 6 months' work at the same time; > > Don't be that strict with yourself. Even if the code isn't of much use you

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1401

Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011, 17:02:16 schrieb xor: > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:05:59 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I believed I had seriously screwed > > everything up and wasted 6 months' work at the same time; > > Don't be that strict with yourself. Even if the code isn't of much use you

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 13:25:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2011 21:02:54 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > what this means: if a SSK has a mean success rate of 0.16, then using > > 0.25 as value makes sure that 95% of the possible cases don?t exhaust > &

Re: [freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 13:25:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2011 21:02:54 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > what this means: if a SSK has a mean success rate of 0.16, then using > > 0.25 as value makes sure that 95% of the possible cases don’t exhaust > &

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 01:08:16 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > 5) solution: count each SSK as only > average_SSK_success_rate * data_to_transfer_on_success. Some more data: chances of having at least this many successful transfers for 40 SSKs with a mean success rate

[freenet-dev] Queueing doesn't use any bandwidth was Re: Beyond New Load Management

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU > resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't > actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which > case it use

Re: [freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 01:08:16 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > 5) solution: count each SSK as only > average_SSK_success_rate * data_to_transfer_on_success. Some more data: chances of having at least this many successful transfers for 40 SSKs with a mean success rate of 16%

Re: [freenet-dev] Queueing doesn't use any bandwidth was Re: Beyond New Load Management

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU > resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't > actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which > case it use

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

ave a significant > efficiency cost, and would probably make load management more difficult. > > I apologise if you see this as rather a broadside after I encouraged you to > analyse the problem, but it is not yet a convincing demonstration that > queueing is a viable strategy and not the

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Montag, 29. August 2011, 14:32:13 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Yes, small tweaks have worked so well for us for the last decade, leaving us > pretty-much where we were in 2003. No, we don't understand how the current > system works, there is no point in trying to fix something when we don't > even kno

Re: [freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

t > efficiency cost, and would probably make load management more difficult. > > I apologise if you see this as rather a broadside after I encouraged you to > analyse the problem, but it is not yet a convincing demonstration that > queueing is a viable strategy and not the spawn o

Re: [freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Montag, 29. August 2011, 14:32:13 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Yes, small tweaks have worked so well for us for the last decade, leaving us > pretty-much where we were in 2003. No, we don't understand how the current > system works, there is no point in trying to fix something when we don't > even kno

[freenet-dev] Hello

Hi Zurc, Welcome to Freenet! Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 14:17:22 schrieb Zurc: > I can imagine it takes quite a bit of processing to figure out which of > those ten computers had the furry porn because the cache on each of the > computers is 30ish gig big, so thats 300 gigabytes worth of no

Re: [freenet-dev] Hello

Hi Zurc, Welcome to Freenet! Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 14:17:22 schrieb Zurc: > I can imagine it takes quite a bit of processing to figure out which of > those ten computers had the furry porn because the cache on each of the > computers is 30ish gig big, so thats 300 gigabytes worth of not w

[freenet-dev] Most users drop out before the first-time wizard is finished

Update: We worked a bit on the first time user experience. Reasoning: Only 1 choice at startup: default setting or wizard. ? http://piratepad.net/H3kOp3QXuV Current version, without the text markup: 3 scenarios: - With invite. Can stay darknet or enable opennet as well for better performance.

Re: [freenet-dev] Most users drop out before the first-time wizard is finished

Update: We worked a bit on the first time user experience. Reasoning: Only 1 choice at startup: default setting or wizard. → http://piratepad.net/H3kOp3QXuV Current version, without the text markup: 3 scenarios: - With invite. Can stay darknet or enable opennet as well for better performance.

[freenet-dev] Greetings Freenet Devs

On Sunday 29 May 2011 21:29:22 Tom Elovi Spruce wrote: > 2. Creating a free web publishing platform for everyone. This way, you can > convince people to be part of the opennet and get more nodes. Maybe this > will lead to having the opennet "feel" just as responsive as the typical > client-server p

Re: [freenet-dev] Greetings Freenet Devs

On Sunday 29 May 2011 21:29:22 Tom Elovi Spruce wrote: > 2. Creating a free web publishing platform for everyone. This way, you can > convince people to be part of the opennet and get more nodes. Maybe this > will lead to having the opennet "feel" just as responsive as the typical > client-server p

Re: [freenet-dev] Idea for marketing, related to GSoC student decision

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:22:09 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 18 Apr 2011 15:49:50 xor wrote: > > IF we get a decent new web interface done which integrates all of those, > > we could make a theme which completely looks like Facebook and then do > > a major press release which claims someth

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:35:41 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins. That would be cool! Then we could add real gateways to WoT, creating a decentral, anonymizing (as long as you can trust your gateway) social network. ?getting even more excit

[freenet-dev] Idea for marketing, related to GSoC student decision

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:22:09 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 18 Apr 2011 15:49:50 xor wrote: > > IF we get a decent new web interface done which integrates all of those, > > we could make a theme which completely looks like Facebook and then do > > a major press release which claims someth

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:35:41 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins. That would be cool! Then we could add real gateways to WoT, creating a decentral, anonymizing (as long as you can trust your gateway) social network. …getting even more excited

[freenet-dev] Should we accept Flattr?

I think Flattr is a great way to support websites. For freenet it might be useful, because Freenet is often in the news and so people who just like the idea can give their support. I use it on my sites. It is neither free software, nor anonymous, though. Best wishes, Arne

Re: [freenet-dev] Should we accept Flattr?

I think Flattr is a great way to support websites. For freenet it might be useful, because Freenet is often in the news and so people who just like the idea can give their support. I use it on my sites. It is neither free software, nor anonymous, though. Best wishes, Arne ___

[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

Hi Andrea, On Saturday 12 March 2011 12:22:22 mambro wrote: > do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport > plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement > some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers? I do con

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

Hi Andrea, On Saturday 12 March 2011 12:22:22 mambro wrote: > do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport > plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement > some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers? I do cons

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

On Thursday 10 March 2011 19:06:46 Michiel de Jong wrote: > Still, since you're already distributing the web app, i don't see so much > added advantage in separating the app from the data (which is what unhosted > is all about). it makes sense to put javascript into freenet extension, but > not so

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

On Thursday 10 March 2011 19:06:46 Michiel de Jong wrote: > Still, since you're already distributing the web app, i don't see so much > added advantage in separating the app from the data (which is what unhosted > is all about). it makes sense to put javascript into freenet extension, but > not so

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

On Monday 14 February 2011 09:08:28 Michiel de Jong wrote: > I may remember this incorrectly, but I think when I tried out freenet, it's > a desktop application, and not a localhost http service, right? Freenet is a localhost http-service. I already used it remotely quite often by just tunnellin

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

On Monday 14 February 2011 09:08:28 Michiel de Jong wrote: > I may remember this incorrectly, but I think when I tried out freenet, it's > a desktop application, and not a localhost http service, right? Freenet is a localhost http-service. I already used it remotely quite often by just tunnelling

[freenet-dev] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Saturday 05 February 2011 18:39:49 Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you > can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably > static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth > (especia

Re: [freenet-dev] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Saturday 05 February 2011 18:39:49 Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you > can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably > static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth > (especia

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:36:14 Volodya wrote: > I had some issues with the menu. Sometimes when you hover over the menu and > submenu opens it is tricky to move the mouse in the way that doesn't close > the submenu. Is it better now? I increased the active area. > - Volodya >

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

On Tuesday 08 February 2011 09:01:28 Daniel Kanaan wrote: > Nice clean theme. Thanks! -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 316 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL:

Re: [freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:36:14 Volodya wrote: > I had some issues with the menu. Sometimes when you hover over the menu and > submenu opens it is tricky to move the mouse in the way that doesn't close > the submenu. Is it better now? I increased the active area. > - Volodya >

Re: [freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

On Tuesday 08 February 2011 09:01:28 Daniel Kanaan wrote: > Nice clean theme. Thanks! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/d

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

Hi, I created a mockup for a freenet theme. My main goal was getting the structure out of the way of the content, so I went for a horizontal menu with horizontal submenu (persistent) all done with CSS for performance and cleanlyness :) The rest is done with the theme ?into the rabbit hole? in

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

Hi, I created a mockup for a freenet theme. My main goal was getting the structure out of the way of the content, so I went for a horizontal menu with horizontal submenu (persistent) all done with CSS for performance and cleanlyness :) The rest is done with the theme „into the rabbit hole“ in min

[freenet-dev] Future of disk encryption in Freenet?

On Sunday 01 August 2010 12:14:51 Ximin Luo wrote: > So yes we should just drop "physical security". To do it properly we'll > have to fuck with parts of people's machines we really shouldn't be > fucking with; and if they are that paranoid (I am) they should just > encrypt their entire disks, whi

Re: [freenet-dev] Future of disk encryption in Freenet?

On Sunday 01 August 2010 12:14:51 Ximin Luo wrote: > So yes we should just drop "physical security". To do it properly we'll > have to fuck with parts of people's machines we really shouldn't be > fucking with; and if they are that paranoid (I am) they should just > encrypt their entire disks, whi

[freenet-dev] New server, current status of services

Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010 21:34:47 schrieb Cl?ment Vollet: > last one is six months old); and by news, I don't mean a news about a > switch of server like I suggested above, but news about the life of the > project (development, new plugins, tech stuff, etc.). Maybe the users > won't understand

Re: [freenet-dev] New server, current status of services

Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010 21:34:47 schrieb Clément Vollet: > last one is six months old); and by news, I don't mean a news about a > switch of server like I suggested above, but news about the life of the > project (development, new plugins, tech stuff, etc.). Maybe the users > won't understand

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 10:02:52 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist: > There was a proposal more than a couple of years ago to create poems for > the node reference. In fact there were two source-ready versions posted > on this list. They would be way too long to put on a business card, but >

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 10:02:52 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist: > There was a proposal more than a couple of years ago to create poems for > the node reference. In fact there were two source-ready versions posted > on this list. They would be way too long to put on a business card, but >

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 21:32:36 schrieb Robert Hailey: > > -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/ > I really like the *idea*, but I wish it were easier to implement. It > would be a pain to enter that huge noderef by hand. ... > freenet://192.168.0.128:4567/14/xYaEue344 ... > Couldn't we then

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 21:32:36 schrieb Robert Hailey: > > -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/ > I really like the *idea*, but I wish it were easier to implement. It > would be a pain to enter that huge noderef by hand. ... > freenet://192.168.0.128:4567/14/xYaEue344 ... > Couldn't we then

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Hi, A few years back I wrote freenet-cards which you can give your friends so they can easily check your node-ref. For a long time these lived only on a freesite, but I just pushed them on a normal website to help spread freenet. -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/ Please use them as you see

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Hi, A few years back I wrote freenet-cards which you can give your friends so they can easily check your node-ref. For a long time these lived only on a freesite, but I just pushed them on a normal website to help spread freenet. -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/ Please use them as you see

[freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture. > > Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default. Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the activelinks. Wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

[freenet-dev] About the website

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771: > Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites) This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and at the same time tells them why we use it (what's the difference between a freesite and a normal website).

[freenet-dev] The new blue gradient website background

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 02:06:06 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > Blue Gradient background won't work, because: But it looked very nice to me, and I could read the text quite well... --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free softwar

Re: [freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture. > > Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default. Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the activelinks. Wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Re: [freenet-dev] About the website

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771: > Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites) This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and at the same time tells them why we use it (what's the difference between a freesite and a normal website).

[freenet-dev] About the website

Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 19:52:32 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Okay. The homepage now says: > ' Freenet is free software which lets you anonymously share files, browse > and publish web sites, and chat on forums, without fear of censorship. > Users are anonymous, and Freenet is entirely decentrali

Re: [freenet-dev] The new blue gradient website background

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 02:06:06 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > Blue Gradient background won't work, because: But it looked very nice to me, and I could read the text quite well... --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free softwar

Re: [freenet-dev] About the website

Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 19:52:32 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Okay. The homepage now says: > ' Freenet is free software which lets you anonymously share files, browse > and publish web sites, and chat on forums, without fear of censorship. > Users are anonymous, and Freenet is entirely decentrali

[freenet-dev] About the website

Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2009 21:53:58 schrieb Evan Daniel: > I don't know. I don't see such an option in WP, but I don't know much > about the underlying software. To have a safe wiki it would also be posible to follow the path the GNU/Hurd took: Have a wiki with DVCS backend. That way has a few

Re: [freenet-dev] About the website

Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2009 21:53:58 schrieb Evan Daniel: > I don't know. I don't see such an option in WP, but I don't know much > about the underlying software. To have a safe wiki it would also be posible to follow the path the GNU/Hurd took: Have a wiki with DVCS backend. That way has a few

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 12:10:39 schrieb Florent Daigniere: > No way. Bugzilla is everything but usable in our case. OK. So it's Trac (with complex import but DVCS integration), Mantis (which some don't like) or an unfree solution. Did I miss one? I didn't yet include roundup, because I only sa

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 12:10:39 schrieb Florent Daigniere: > No way. Bugzilla is everything but usable in our case. OK. So it's Trac (with complex import but DVCS integration), Mantis (which some don't like) or an unfree solution. Did I miss one? I didn't yet include roundup, because I only sa

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Monday, 8. June 2009 05:44:58 Ian Clarke wrote: > > And no matter how nice these people are, do you trust their strengths of > > principles not to stab our back when they get threatened, if their > > principles aren't even strong enough to make their project free software? > > What if it isn't t

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Monday, 8. June 2009 03:22:13 steve wrote: > As others have pointed out, we're only talking about a bug tracker, at most > it is an annoyance and not a threat to the projects security A bugtracker is _very close_ to a development dependency. How much time did we now spend with searching for a

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:43:12 Ian Clarke wrote: > >> Is it free? (I couldn't get that information from my first glance on the > >> site) > > > > No. :| > > Yes it is, its free for open source projects, see > http://sera.lighthouseapp.com/plans That's gratis but not libre, so it isn't free. Ma

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:49:42 Ian Clarke wrote: > Its only a bugtracker. If they were to suddenly go evil (which they > have no incentive to do) then it would be an annoyance, but not a > disaster - we'd just move elsewhere. When we take a look at the current search for a new solution, I thi

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Friday, 5. June 2009 21:59:46 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I already had that feeling about uservoice, but there I though "oh well, > > it's not really integral for freenet". But the bugtracker is integral, > > and relying on a proprietary solution for an integral part of freenet is > > dangerous

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Monday, 8. June 2009 05:44:58 Ian Clarke wrote: > > And no matter how nice these people are, do you trust their strengths of > > principles not to stab our back when they get threatened, if their > > principles aren't even strong enough to make their project free software? > > What if it isn't t

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Monday, 8. June 2009 03:22:13 steve wrote: > As others have pointed out, we're only talking about a bug tracker, at most > it is an annoyance and not a threat to the projects security A bugtracker is _very close_ to a development dependency. How much time did we now spend with searching for a

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:43:12 Ian Clarke wrote: > >> Is it free? (I couldn't get that information from my first glance on the > >> site) > > > > No. :| > > Yes it is, its free for open source projects, see > http://sera.lighthouseapp.com/plans That's gratis but not libre, so it isn't free. Ma

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:49:42 Ian Clarke wrote: > Its only a bugtracker. If they were to suddenly go evil (which they > have no incentive to do) then it would be an annoyance, but not a > disaster - we'd just move elsewhere. When we take a look at the current search for a new solution, I thi

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Friday, 5. June 2009 21:59:46 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I already had that feeling about uservoice, but there I though "oh well, > > it's not really integral for freenet". But the bugtracker is integral, > > and relying on a proprietary solution for an integral part of freenet is > > dangerous

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and > > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't > > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API. > > How is it different to M

Re: [freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and > > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't > > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API. > > How is it different to M

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Thursday, 4. June 2009 14:58:35 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Can you elaborate on this? Are you saying that the only way to take > donations with sourceforge is through sourceforge's donations system? That > could cost us a significant amount of money... That's what I read in their docs: --

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Thursday, 4. June 2009 14:58:35 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Can you elaborate on this? Are you saying that the only way to take > donations with sourceforge is through sourceforge's donations system? That > could cost us a significant amount of money... That's what I read in their docs: --

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Mantis: We could run this ourselves using php+mysql on sourceforge servers, > but we would have to admin it ourselves. Their hosted apps service does not > currently support importing data, so we would not be able to use that to > host o

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should > perform well. If there is no dynamic code there should be no administrative > overhead. They don't allow generating money from the webhosting, so SF can't solve s

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Mantis: We could run this ourselves using php+mysql on sourceforge servers, > but we would have to admin it ourselves. Their hosted apps service does not > currently support importing data, so we would not be able to use that to > host o

Re: [freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should > perform well. If there is no dynamic code there should be no administrative > overhead. They don't allow generating money from the webhosting, so SF can't solve s

[freenet-dev] About the website

On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote: > IMHO the above is totally unrealistic. Does that settle the Progress bar question? - Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://i

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >