On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 05:09:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
Note: I saw Alexander Bothe released an update to the parser
one day after
your release... ;)
Sure, there have been a couple of critical regression bugs in the
parser engine.
Furthermore, I re-enabled the ufcs completion.
Rainer, I
i have added dub package to this bindings, need testing. i don't
have an idea how it works since dub lacks documentation.
El 05/11/13 23:46, Walter Bright ha escrit:
On 11/5/2013 2:41 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
Figured it out. You used linux/win/installer.nsi. I have no idea why that
exists and what it is for.
It's so you can build the windows installer from a Linux box. I presumed it
was the same.
It is
El 06/11/13 10:55, Jordi Sayol ha escrit:
El 05/11/13 23:46, Walter Bright ha escrit:
On 11/5/2013 2:41 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
Figured it out. You used linux/win/installer.nsi. I have no idea why that
exists and what it is for.
It's so you can build the windows installer from a Linux
Arch Linux package has been updated.
Was awaiting for some of good stuff from this release for a long
time :)
There are two extremely disappointing things though:
1)
We still can't get versioning right. Walter has treated release
candidate as a release which is why we have 2.064.2 right now
El 05/11/13 23:08, Walter Bright ha escrit:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 12:02:48 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Release notes?
http://dlang.org/changelog
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 12:44:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 12:02:48 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Release notes?
http://dlang.org/changelog
There is a a bug in the new eponymous syntax example in the
changelog:
template isIntOrFloat(T)
{
static if
Dicebot, el 6 de November a las 12:43 me escribiste:
Arch Linux package has been updated.
Was awaiting for some of good stuff from this release for a long
time :)
There are two extremely disappointing things though:
1)
We still can't get versioning right. Walter has treated release
El 05/11/13 23:08, Walter Bright ha escrit:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb
On 11/6/2013 6:29 PM, evilrat wrote:
i have added dub package to this bindings, need testing. i don't have an
idea how it works since dub lacks documentation.
http://code.dlang.org/about
http://code.dlang.org/package-format
On 6 November 2013 18:25, Alexander Bothe i...@alexanderbothe.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 05:09:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
Note: I saw Alexander Bothe released an update to the parser one day after
your release... ;)
Sure, there have been a couple of critical regression bugs in the
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 14:25:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 11/6/2013 6:29 PM, evilrat wrote:
i have added dub package to this bindings, need testing. i
don't have an
idea how it works since dub lacks documentation.
http://code.dlang.org/about
http://code.dlang.org/package-format
Regarding project files - I like Mono-D attempt to support dub
package.json as project description file.
Regarding semantical analysis - both Mono-D and VisualD should
just merged efforts with DCD, problem solved :)
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 14:35:07 UTC, evilrat wrote:
also if you look at my repo u can see it has examples
subfolder, should i put package.json there too or it would be
simpler to add custom build script for building all this
examples?
I think former is expected as it is how Sonke
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 14:44:59 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 14:35:07 UTC, evilrat wrote:
also if you look at my repo u can see it has examples
subfolder, should i put package.json there too or it would be
simpler to add custom build script for building all
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 14:43:35 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Regarding project files - I like Mono-D attempt to support dub
package.json as project description file.
Regarding semantical analysis - both Mono-D and VisualD should
just merged efforts with DCD, problem solved :)
I dunno,
On 06/11/2013 14:39, Manu wrote:
For instance, it seems a shame to have .visualdproj, and .dproj files
separate and incompatible. .csproj files are the same between VS and MD,
I wonder if the same is possible for D with collaboration?
The best approach here is to support an IDE-independent
06-Nov-2013 02:08, Walter Bright пишет:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb
On 11/6/13, Sergei Nosov sergei.no...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to work now! I've send you a little pull request fixing
glu loading on my Ubuntu setup.
Merged. And thanks!
On 11/6/13, Szymon Gatner noem...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a a bug in the new eponymous syntax example in the
changelog
This was fixed, the website hasn't been updated.
On 7 November 2013 02:05, Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.comwrote:
On 06/11/2013 14:39, Manu wrote:
For instance, it seems a shame to have .visualdproj, and .dproj files
separate and incompatible. .csproj files are the same between VS and MD,
I wonder if the same is possible for D
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1q1dct/d_release_2064_is_out_with_35_enhancements_and/
Andrei
Picking common standard for all possible IDE's scales better than
cloning approach of a single one (especially if this one is
closed and known of forcing closed ecosystems)
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 04:11:52 UTC, Manu wrote:
On 6 November 2013 09:54, Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 23:51:54 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/5/2013 2:52 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
He's made so many changes I don't even know where to begin
On 11/6/13, Sergei Nosov sergei.no...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to work now! I've send you a little pull request fixing
glu loading on my Ubuntu setup.
Btw, which compiler are you using? Could you try running on LDC/GDC if
you have that installed and see if there's any performance difference?
On 11/6/13 9:41 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1q1dct/d_release_2064_is_out_with_35_enhancements_and/
Hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6684003
Twitter: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/398144005478707200
Andrei
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 22:24:03 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 22:08:48 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
I'm confused. The changelog pages links to
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.064.zip, while the download page
links to
http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2013/dmd.2.064.2.zip. Which
is the correct file/version?
Also, at least on OS X (with both versions) I get a link error in
the wrap
On 11/6/2013 5:16 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
In dmd.2.064.2.zip, src/VERSION contains 2.064. Should be 2.064.2
I deliberately didn't do that because it would have required rebuilding all the
binaries just for that.
On 11/6/2013 4:34 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Also I find strange that the first patchlevel version is 2 and not 1.
Was that intended or just an error?
It was intended. I felt that 2.064 = 2.064.1 would have been confusing, hence
2.064 = 2.064.2
On 11/6/2013 11:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I confirm that. Walter, could this have something to do with the new approach to
compiling templates?
It might. You can confirm by seeing if it works with -allinst switch.
On 11/6/13 11:56 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/6/2013 11:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I confirm that. Walter, could this have something to do with the new
approach to
compiling templates?
It might. You can confirm by seeing if it works with -allinst switch.
I confirm it works when
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 19:57:40 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/6/2013 4:34 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Also I find strange that the first patchlevel version is 2 and
not 1.
Was that intended or just an error?
It was intended. I felt that 2.064 = 2.064.1 would have been
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 20:06:54 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/6/13 11:56 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
It might. You can confirm by seeing if it works with -allinst
switch.
I confirm it works when compiled with -allinst.
Is that switch new? It is not documented in the
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:08:50 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:27:01 +, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:08:50 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 17:49:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Picking common standard for all possible IDE's scales better
than cloning approach of a single one (especially if this one
is closed and known of forcing closed ecosystems)
Essentially, dub.
I'm okay with that decision :-P
Is it possible to build something like wrap, so that it can be
given a wrapping class instead of a wrapping interface?
I was trying to build something very similar to wrap, and at
first glance it seems like wrap might suit me, except that I
wanted to wrap the wolf in the class Sheeps clothes,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:37:56 +, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:27:01 +, Jonathan Crapuchettes wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:08:50 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 20:11:13 UTC, Aleksandar Ruzicic
wrote:
versions must be marked with rc, as betas are marked with b
flag. Something like 2.064-rc.1, 2.064-rc.2, ... 2.064
(stable/major release), 2.064.1 (patch release), ...
This (-rc.xx) is how RC versions should be marked as
On 2013-11-06 20:57, Walter Bright wrote:
It was intended. I felt that 2.064 = 2.064.1 would have been confusing,
hence 2.064 = 2.064.2
That's what's happening if you start to add new digits. The first
release should have possibly been 2.064.0. BTW, there was a 2.063.1, if
I recall
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 20:46:23 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Is it possible to build something like wrap, so that it can be
given a wrapping class instead of a wrapping interface?
I was trying to build something very similar to wrap, and at
first glance it seems like wrap might suit me,
There have been a lot of comments about the package naming scheme and numbering
scheme. I confess that these issues do not seem that important to me, as the
user just clicks on a url, but I recognize that they are very important to others.
This is why I believe that D needs a Build Master.
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 21:25:46 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
There have been a lot of comments about the package naming
scheme and numbering scheme. I confess that these issues do not
seem that important to me, as the user just clicks on a url,
but I recognize that they are very
On 11/6/2013 1:43 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
It might need to be multiple people because very few people are experts in every
platform supported. Maybe a release manager with more platform lieutenants to
help.
Of course. Being in charge of something doesn't mean being expert at all of it
or
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 22:08:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
Walter Bright, el 6 de November a las 12:01 me escribiste:
On 11/6/2013 5:16 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
In dmd.2.064.2.zip, src/VERSION contains 2.064. Should be 2.064.2
I deliberately didn't do that because it would have required
rebuilding all the binaries just for that.
And that's bad
Walter Bright, el 6 de November a las 11:57 me escribiste:
On 11/6/2013 4:34 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Also I find strange that the first patchlevel version is 2 and not 1.
Was that intended or just an error?
It was intended. I felt that 2.064 = 2.064.1 would have been
confusing, hence
Jacob Carlborg, el 6 de November a las 22:06 me escribiste:
On 2013-11-06 20:57, Walter Bright wrote:
It was intended. I felt that 2.064 = 2.064.1 would have been confusing,
hence 2.064 = 2.064.2
That's what's happening if you start to add new digits. The first
release should have
, el 6 de November a las 21:53 me escribiste:
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 20:11:13 UTC, Aleksandar Ruzicic
wrote:
versions must be marked with rc, as betas are marked with b
flag. Something like 2.064-rc.1, 2.064-rc.2, ... 2.064
(stable/major release), 2.064.1 (patch release), ...
On Thursday, November 07, 2013 00:11:37 Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 6 de November a las 11:57 me escribiste:
On 11/6/2013 4:34 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Also I find strange that the first patchlevel version is 2 and not 1.
Was that intended or just an error?
It was
On 11/6/2013 3:43 PM, nazriel wrote:
Good job everyone!
DPaste is already using it
Nice!
On 11/6/2013 3:20 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 6 de November a las 12:01 me escribiste:
On 11/6/2013 5:16 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
In dmd.2.064.2.zip, src/VERSION contains 2.064. Should be 2.064.2
I deliberately didn't do that because it would have required
rebuilding all
On Wednesday, 6 November 2013 at 18:15:58 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/6/13, Sergei Nosov sergei.no...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to work now! I've send you a little pull request
fixing
glu loading on my Ubuntu setup.
Btw, which compiler are you using? Could you try running on
LDC/GDC
On 06.11.2013 09:25, Alexander Bothe wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 05:09:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
Note: I saw Alexander Bothe released an update to the parser one day
after
your release... ;)
Sure, there have been a couple of critical regression bugs in the parser
engine.
Furthermore, I
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 05:45:34 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 06.11.2013 09:25, Alexander Bothe wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 05:09:58 UTC, Manu wrote:
Note: I saw Alexander Bothe released an update to the parser
one day
after
your release... ;)
Sure, there have been a
The C library is relatively small, clocking in at about ~11.000
lines
Do I right understand that rewriting code from C to D did not
make it's more compact? I tried to calculate D source lines, and
get ~11.000
On 2013-11-06 18:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1q1dct/d_release_2064_is_out_with_35_enhancements_and/
Are we even ready to announce this yet? I though we were in the release
candidate phase.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2013-11-05 23:08, Walter Bright wrote:
Ok, this is it:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.064.2-0_i386.deb
Good to have a thread on it, thank you for taking this step Walter !
Although, it looks to me that the numbering scheme and the git tags are not
related to the build, but rather related to the release.
So you might consider a release master, not just build.
This will involve doing (or delegating
61 matches
Mail list logo
