Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1520.1310357559.14074.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Now, if deprecated were improved to take a message (and to allow for soft
deprecation, since the messages printing here are about stuff being
scheduled
for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 is in the changelog, but
has not been fixed.
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:j49jd4$22mu$1...@digitalmars.com...
By far, the most number of bug fixes ever!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
The bugzilla links up the top don't work for me.
Are you inculding dups in the resolved count?
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:jfhfaq$e9g$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 1/22/12 1:55 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
The bugzilla links up the top don't work for me.
Do they work now?
Yep.
Are you inculding dups in the resolved count?
Everything
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jg3ila$1qcb$1...@digitalmars.com...
__ is not enforced. You can create your own identifiers string with __.
Yes, but if you do, it's _your_ problem when the compiler starts using that
identifier and breaks your code.
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:jg3du9$1i37$1...@digitalmars.com...
I have not written it because I don't feel a significant need for this
syntax sugar. So if you like it, I suggest to write it yourself :-)
Recently I have already done the mistake of asking for
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:ji1dfl$17ha$1...@digitalmars.com...
http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/C9-GoingNative/GoingNative-6-The-D-Episode-with-Walter-Bright-and-Andrei-Alexandrescu
Sounds like I should finish my extern(C++) branch...
I love how this started as interesting and turned into awesome.
Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
Bystroushaak bystrou...@kitakitsune.org wrote in message
news:mailman.239.1330541205.24984.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Thx.
On 29.2.2012 18:03, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 29/02/2012 16:56, Bystroushaak wrote:
Daniel Murphy's microd fork of dmd, meant to output C
Link please.
Bystroushaak bystrou...@kitakitsune.org wrote in message
news:mailman.281.1330632834.24984.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
I've played with gdc, but it's pretty complicated. I have few ADM 5120
routers with debwrt and it would be nice to be able compile D2 code
there, but so far, it
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jipus9$v81$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2012-03-02 03:28, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 08:01:07 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Web programming... might actually become non-horrible?
As far as I can tell, we have variable lifetime
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jiq8kb$1ht0$1...@digitalmars.com...
CommaExp's containing Declarations
Is he saying var a, b, c; is invalid JavaScript code?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
It's invalid if it's a comma expression.
eg.
auto x = (auto a = 3, a);
Which dmd creates
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:omhitgvibquioulpc...@forum.dlang.org...
If I add a way to instead put those var declarations in
function scope, it is cleaner - no globals - and the same
thing Javascript itself would do anyway!
I'll have to redo the string
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jit2r7$rlu$2...@digitalmars.com...
I thought unrecognized pragmas were supposed to just be ignored? (Or
maybe I
have it backwards?)
No, they're not:
Compilers must diagnose an error for unrecognized Pragmas, even if they
are vendor
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:uhqgqgsyzzxrctbef...@forum.dlang.org...
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 03:06:12 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Cool, please do.
I suck at using git, but I think it works now:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/dmd/tree/dtojs
Zach the Mystic reachminusthiszachgm...@dot.com wrote in message
news:cibxxwrywnorlxwth...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 20:46:40 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Hi,
which version of the compiler can this be built with?
I get this with 2.058:
dmd\binExp.d(324): Error:
Zach the Mystic reachminusthiszachgm...@dot.com wrote in message
news:afqmbmvuvizvgfooe...@forum.dlang.org...
I'll gladly put a license on it if the leaders of the community tell me
which one to use ( Artistic, libpng, Boost ).
Zach
It will need to be the same license as the frontend
Zach the Mystic reachminusthiszachgm...@dot.com wrote in message
news:duefgfqidzxwcfvge...@forum.dlang.org...
On Thursday, 8 March 2012 at 01:38:43 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
You should check, but I think isBit is dead code anyway.
I think it is. I've left a number of dead codes because
Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org wrote in message
news:k0bs29$1bpl$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 13-08-2012 23:34, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/13/2012 12:41 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
I've thought many times about adding a D feature that allows one to
specify use this random character string instead
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:k7cko9$hes$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/6/2012 6:10 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
My thoughts exactly. It reminds me of the horror of C++ exceptions. I
think it would be reasonable to require every annotation is a struct or
class
Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote in message
news:k7d8n1$1o69$1...@digitalmars.com...
Most importantly, if users still want to experiment with anonymous
annotations, they still can:
[tuple(3)] class Blah {}
Then what does this particular restriction buy?
It makes it harder to do the
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:dklglravazsxxbvrl...@forum.dlang.org...
They are very similar, the test case from Issue 519 uses a new:
[snip]
While in Issue 9454 (just like in that Ada code) there is no new:
[snip]
Maybe my Issue 9454 should be merged with Issue
David Nadlinger c...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:qikvjtuajorstsxhh...@forum.dlang.org...
Derp. Turns out that actually calling the newly added Expression::init
during startup might be a good idea.
That must have been interesting. They are never dereferenced, so no
immediate
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de wrote in message
news:ktbvam$dvf$1...@digitalmars.com...
large-address-aware).
This shows that removing most of the allocations was a good optimization
for the dmc-Runtime, but does not have a large, but still notable impact
on a faster heap implementation
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:l69git$14v1$1...@digitalmars.com...
Please join me in congratulating Daniel, who took only 24 hours to fix a
codegen bug:
qznc q...@web.de wrote in message
news:tnqbltivfadrkuvxr...@forum.dlang.org...
Not related to core D, but we have an LLVM backend and it is generally
interesting for compiler devs.
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2013-11/
If Julia gets a talk there, maybe someone could present LDC in 2014?
The
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbdumk$2oki$1...@digitalmars.com...
[1] ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.beta.1.zip
Windows bin folder is empty. I'd post on the list but I'm not sure it's
working at the moment.
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbe25n$2rrh$1...@digitalmars.com...
Thanks. New file uploaded.
Looking much better.
I extracted this beta and the last release, and diffed the result of `dir
/s` to see what changed.
Some of these may be intentional, thanks to problems with the old zip
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbmru9$290b$1...@digitalmars.com...
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.zip
While you're at it, can we get per-platform zips? Just take the normal zip
and delete all but one platform.
Martin Nowak wrote in message
news:jcszzsgkwldowcmwz...@forum.dlang.org...
Mmh, we could simply upload the intermediate zip files for each platform,
that fall out of create_dmd_release before they are combined.
Sounds good.
Walter Bright wrote in message news:lbuc93$ke0$1...@digitalmars.com...
(I also recommend registering yourname.com and a twitter account in your
name, for the same reason.)
Not so easy:
https://github.com/DanielMurphy (not me)
https://twitter.com/danielmurphy (not me)
Martin Nowak wrote in message
news:jcszzsgkwldowcmwz...@forum.dlang.org...
Mmh, we could simply upload the intermediate zip files for each platform,
that fall out of create_dmd_release before they are combined.
Any ETA on this? I'd like to provide a win32 version with dmd replaced by
ddmd
On Sunday, 26 January 2014 at 23:38:56 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
We've made a lot of progress towards the 2.065 stable release.
Available binaries are as follows:
Linux
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b2.linux.zip
For anyone feeling adventurous - I've uploaded an alternative
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:lc7vah$149c$2...@digitalmars.com...
Cool. Is it too early to try it on OS X?
It's ~4 hours work away from working on OS X (if the linux port is a good
indicator), but I don't have a mac box to work on. If anyone can provide me
with an ssh account I'd
DDMD alpha win32 debug nogc
http://dtsm460.web.cse.unsw.edu.au/dmd.2.065.0-b2.windows.ddmd.zip
This one is most likely to work!
1100110 wrote in message news:tjgimnoqoflzrcrlw...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm offering a $50 bounty on this.
(Preferably Bitcoins, but I'll use bountysource if desired.)
I'd say just put it on bountysource, because then there's more chance others
will add to it.
rules:
Has to be called
Orvid King wrote in message news:ntpjdeutsxqicjywt...@forum.dlang.org...
(except for float-string
conversion, which I don't understand the algorithms enough to
implement myself) even going so far as to create an output range
based version of to!string(int/uint/long/ulong/etc.).
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl2pf$20b0$1...@digitalmars.com...
I want a way to disable the GC, and have the compiler verify that no GC
allocations may occur.
I want a way to disable Exceptions, and have the compiler verify that no
Exceptions may occur.
Good, this is what I had in
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl6v6$255r$1...@digitalmars.com...
I dont know enough about TLS to comment really. Thoughts?
It's probably platform dependent, I guess it should work everywhere that C
supports TLS.
Dynamic cast can be disabled.
Sure, but should it be an error or be
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl9fj$28g6$1...@digitalmars.com...
I don't think it's worth throwing out assert over. A runtime that
supported assert + Object would be about 8 lines and would IMO be
worthwhile.
But then where do we stop?
This is why I think it's an excellent idea to have
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:op.xa929juueav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
static this/~this is tougher. If it is possible for it to work, then
it should. I feel that this is more of a language feature.
These might work with init sections, but maybe not.
No, static
Denis Koroskin wrote in message
news:wjdvvungwvpemwmxl...@forum.dlang.org...
I'll throw in $300 extra (maybe more), but can you please first
formalize the requirements (list of flags, and what each flag
should mean, required unittests to pass etc).
Required unittests are very helpful,
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:op.xbm0zbffeav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
I know that Andrei is now living in the area, and he was the one who
picked Aloft. I'm assuming Andrei's house is likely not the new location
;) Where is the hot spot this year going to be? I want to
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:op.xbs1naiueav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
A wild wild guess is that there was code in the compiler that used to
require it (after all, it was required a long time ago), and somehow it
got reactivated by accident.
But wild guesses don't help
bearophile wrote in message news:bskrlqgtwkqdyoqwk...@forum.dlang.org...
D language has similar rules, but I don't rember if the D
compiler warns against usage of similar identifiers.
It doesn't!
[snip etc]
The D compiler is not a lint tool!
Dicebot wrote in message news:rkgevwccvxaynrbbi...@forum.dlang.org...
Full stop. It should be other way around - remove all such
arguable warnings from compiler to dedicated lint tool and never
add any single one to compiler.
Exactly.
This sort of thing would make an excellent compiler
Michel Fortin wrote in message news:lfqcs6$2su5$1...@digitalmars.com...
If the compiler is going to be converted to the D language (how is that
progressing?), it'd probably be better to merge before that, otherwise
it'll be a lot of work to port all those changes.
The converter can convert
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:lfqf4t$2v1o$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think Daniel has said he as a working Linux compiler. He just need to
create pull requests (and get them merged) for all changes his tool
requires.
The changes to dmd's source are all done(!), it's now time to start
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message news:53231aa4.1020...@erdani.org...
That said, since recently there are too many D internal projects for me
to oversee so if anything I'm lacking headcount.
Awesome!
So a couple of years ago I had too much free time and wrote a linker.
It's now on github: https://github.com/yebblies/ylink
Pros:
- Written in D
- Not written in assembly
- Not written before I was born
- Boost license
- Usually produces working executables
Cons:
- No debug information (yet)
-
Daniel Murphy wrote in message news:lgngea$1ccj$1...@digitalmars.com...
So a couple of years ago I had too much free time and wrote a linker.
It's now on github: https://github.com/yebblies/ylink
Now updated with basic mscoff32 support - although dmd doesn't emit that
file format, it does
Jay Norwood wrote in message news:tsyxasgqmrkmuolmf...@forum.dlang.org...
Is there a test suite that you have to pass to declare it fully
functional?
Not that I know of, but it _almost_ passes the dmd test suite (3 failures).
I'm slowly refactoring it so I can build a comprehensive test
Is there some way to get the severity column back on the search results
page? And make regressions orange again?
Brad Roberts wrote in message
news:mailman.102.1397104256.1648.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
At the bottom of the search results page there is a 'change columns'
button with the ui to control the columns to display. You'd have had to
do this at some point on the old site
too.
I
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:lncrb0$31ec$1...@digitalmars.com...
It was decided and 100% certain - virtual is not going in. Need to
remove it from DMD before this release is out.
Yes please. -- Andrei
You did say that something with the same effect as 'virtual' was going in.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message news:lndq8q$obh$1...@digitalmars.com...
You did say that something with the same effect as 'virtual' was going
in.
No.
I am certain either you or Walter did in the last 'final by default'
discussion.
Please no new keyword for what can be done
Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote in message
news:mailman.3141.1404253839.2907.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
The host that runs these two services is down. I'm working on getting
them back up.
There's a reasonable chance I'll end up having to restore both db's from
safety0ff wrote in message news:xfceasqsqxxygwzsc...@forum.dlang.org...
I have a kludge / patch for #11435, but I get the impression of
apathy towards back end issues so I don't feel motivated to
contribute.
Are you joking? Do a pull request.
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:lt43pj$ral$1...@digitalmars.com...
Support for C++ namespaces where just released and support for C++
templates will most likely end up in master soon.
Support for C++ templates was in the last release, and the new pull request
is only for special
Jonathan M Davis wrote in message
news:fxdqpmfcbskvtcafz...@forum.dlang.org...
LOL. Yeah, well, it would be ni going to support C+ce if we could get an
actual list of the C++ features that D currently supports somewhere (and
how to use them if it's not obvious). You've been doing so much
Walter Bright wrote in message news:lt5l3k$2s5t$1...@digitalmars.com...
The thing is, while the code was there, there wasn't a single test case
for it in the test suite. Furthermore, at least for Elf, there was no
support for the special mangling done for ::std:: stuff.
Yeah, I don't know
Walter Bright wrote in message news:lt7tan$24ei$1...@digitalmars.com...
1. I hate writing documentation. I really really hate it.
Join the club :-)
=)
Sorry you got to be the pioneer with the arrows in your back, but you've
paved the way for the rest of us.
I don't really mind, for
Kagamin wrote in message news:ujtkjzyvjhtvmcvjh...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 08:18:18 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
2. These features are rather difficult to use, and I don't want people
to think they can just plug-and-play. I've spent a lot of time fighting
compiler
Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote in message
news:pbfaphgiugafrhach...@forum.dlang.org...
I know, but the vendor provided C++ libraries could trigger compiler-magic
in the optimizer, so it might not be enough to look at the source code in
the general case…
I would be very surprised to find a C++
Mike wrote in message news:zjscnxerhbxnopvay...@forum.dlang.org...
The C standard library and C++ standard library are not part of
D-the-language. D would even be better served by putting these features
in phobos as std.stdc and std.stdcpp. This would make them just as
conveniently
Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote in message
news:mclztlymyjydwhcxs...@forum.dlang.org...
Probably, at least without whole-program optimization turned on.
Linking with D is not a concern for whole-program-optimized C++ programs.
But you still have to track compiler version changelogs and then deal
Mike wrote in message news:bkkdiikafdsraqssj...@forum.dlang.org...
I really don't see a practical problem with having them in druntime,
only a philosophical one.
It give the impression that D requires the C standard library, the C++
standard library, and an full-featured desktop OS in
eles wrote in message news:qrfucjdbmydvoqgey...@forum.dlang.org...
While this might be acceptable, there is one more question: what use to
have the druntime separated from phobos, in this case?
Apart from the fact that it's too late to change of course.
For me the druntime shall include
eles wrote in message news:ybcxmuwwpsiyupwer...@forum.dlang.org...
The question of dupplication may be addressed now better, since the newly
fixed bug about hierarchical packaging.
I don't see how.
_only that_ should be the runtime. And the sole part that one needs to
port in order to
eles wrote in message news:rixtiaiokrukvqjsf...@forum.dlang.org...
But the request is simply to split the current druntime in a
language-runtime and a phobos-runtime. The namespace and so on might even
remain the same and the existing code would run unmodified. What is really
important is
weaselcat wrote in message news:rnlbybkfqokypxlgf...@forum.dlang.org...
I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future
fall under?
Generally 'future deprecation' means at least 6 months after it gets turned
into a warning. Often it's significantly longer, because
Nordlöw wrote in message news:iswbimvzcxegthnxg...@forum.dlang.org...
Crap, I should of course have posted this on digitalmars.D.
You should probably post it on dub's issue tracker or forums.
Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote in message
news:mailman.3585.1419448250.9932.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
The animations are super-fast, it makes it hard to see what's going on
but it's still fun. I wonder what that sudden branch explosion was in
DMD, maybe some
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote in message
news:mailman.4595.1421160931.9932.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 14:39:42 Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Daniel prefers to talk through other peoples talks. :o)
Or to work on
Joakim wrote in message news:nphrawlkmiwksghfy...@forum.dlang.org...
Nice work, D needed some direction like this. I thought one oversight was
no mention of ddmd, which seems to have gone into limbo over the last
year. According to Daniel, it's pretty much done but is just waiting on
Brad
Vladimir Panteleev wrote in message
news:viqwfixznbdbdwvha...@forum.dlang.org...
I don't use Dub
You really should! I put it off for months and months but I'm quite happy
with it now.
Brad Anderson wrote in message
news:jcidebafygjtdsabn...@forum.dlang.org...
Sounds like a good subject for Daniel Murphy to talk about. He spent a
good hour explaining to me how a linker works in the Aloft bar after most
people had retired (thanks for that, Daniel) and he certainly knows dmd
I've created a dub package for the D version of DMD's lexer, generated
automatically from the C++ source.
github: https://github.com/yebblies/ddmd
dub: http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddmd
There are a few annoying limitations, such that it uses dmd's error printing
and allocation functions,
Rikki Cattermole wrote in message news:m8be2m$1dlp$1...@digitalmars.com...
I saw that. I'm really looking forward to getting my teeth into it and
doing some good old refactoring. Although that will be a while because
of the auto generated thing.
There's plenty of refactoring to be done on
Kiith-Sa wrote in message news:nffxogzwpmayydyom...@forum.dlang.org...
(sorry if you get this question too often)
How is DDMD as a whole going? Is it getting closer or are ongoing DMD
changes slowing it down too much?
It's been sitting still for 8 nearly months because of
Daniel Murphy wrote in message news:m8bdul$1dke$1...@digitalmars.com...
I've created a dub package for the D version of DMD's lexer, generated
automatically from the C++ source.
github: https://github.com/yebblies/ddmd
dub: http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddmd
I've pushed a new version
Laeeth Isharc wrote in message
news:vtgirvyjsalkzjvlz...@forum.dlang.org...
Thanks v much - this will be very helpful indeed.
Let me know if you have any questions about it.
Laeeth Isharc wrote in message
news:yzmwemaevaltcmkyw...@forum.dlang.org...
on a related note, have you considered sharing your translation tool
(c++ - D)? I completely understand if you would rather not of course.
The translation tool is available on github and is boost licensed.
This
Rainer Schuetze wrote in message news:mehkf1$21k2$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think we should not do it for the dmd 2.067 release. It would be good
to have it integrated into the test infrastructure before adding it to
the release.
I think that needs to be a hard requirement.
Brian Schott wrote in message
news:wctzwywddsrjzbygr...@forum.dlang.org...
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfmt/releases/tag/v0.1.3
dfmt is a source code formatter for D. v0.1.3 fixes 34 issues from v0.1.2.
The codename is inspired by somebody who may or may not* have filed 45
Github
Robert M. Münch wrote in message news:mdi3sn$jh8$1...@digitalmars.com...
make -fwin32.mak C=backend TK=tk ROOT=root HOST_DC= OPT=-o DEBUG=
LFLAGS=-L/delexe/la dmd.exe
run idgen
Error: 'run' not found
dmd has very recently been changed to required dmd already installed on the
system. Until
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:md8vu6$hc1$1...@digitalmars.com...
The DMD front end is not really designed to be used as a library for
tooling.
It isn't, but it's slowly getting better. eg You can now build the lexer as
a library without pulling everything else in. It's quite
Brian Schott wrote in message
news:updwbngwrilngxhun...@forum.dlang.org...
dfmt is a D source code formatting tool.
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfmt/
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfmt/releases/tag/v0.1.0
Is this on code.dlang.org? I can't find it.
Walter Bright wrote in message news:maed4o$2da6$1...@digitalmars.com...
So constructors and destructors are mangled 'a la D' instead of the C++
way.
Please post this to bugzilla.
The problems with constructors go beyond mangling, so the current forced D
mangling is intentional to
Szymon Gatner wrote in message
news:oofoormyfxkefokvk...@forum.dlang.org...
i really try not to be whiny about it but it is sooo frustrating. d
advertises itself as easy to integrate with c/c++ and maybe in theory it
is but in practice it is not true at all. simplest example from Adam's
Szymon Gatner wrote in message
news:tthkrzwwobmdzbufe...@forum.dlang.org...
sure I could bug individuals to make things work for me, then discover
another problem rinse and repeat. thing is i dont want things to somehow
work (possibly only until next release that will breake it) I want to
Kai Nacke wrote in message news:kxcbizohnxdtimjwl...@forum.dlang.org...
But: I am not going to extend the DMD backend! This has 2 consequences.
First, we need to decide how to integrate the code.
(Do we want to clutter the code with #if WANT_CENT as I currently do?
Should we wait for DDMD?)
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:mjkncd$21e7$1...@digitalmars.com...
BTW, I will stress again that I'm going to be at the hotel all day Tuesday
(and without a car) if anyone is interested in hanging out :)
I'll be there from Saturday night.
BBasile wrote in message news:rljvemqjfvnnqqnnc...@forum.dlang.org...
Excellent. I guess it's also time to clean the wiki page that explained
how to build under win32 with DMC. It's obsolete now.
Nope! The glue layer and backend are still in C++, and still need to be
built with DMC.
Mike wrote in message news:hkyvytmqbstkelkum...@forum.dlang.org...
There are still a number of .h files in the front end. What will happen
with those? Do they need to be maintained?
For now they must be maintained by hand, if there is any possibility of the
glue layers or backends needing
Joakim wrote in message news:sfhycfhmabpfxxuxn...@forum.dlang.org...
Great work, thanks to Daniel and others who helped out, can't wait to use
ddmd and see all the changes that come with it in the next couple
releases.
I can't wait to use foreach internally! No more manual for loops!
Can
BBasile wrote in message news:fmoabuqgvlztgmqyj...@forum.dlang.org...
By the way, currently under win32 it's not possible to build DDMD unless
the line
---
#HOST_DC=dmd
---
is uncommented. Because there is a bunch of commands using dmd compile and
run (-run) in win32.mak. Is it a bug ?
Dicebot wrote in message news:jdgpeyxvdltshldnf...@forum.dlang.org...
Great!
Daniel, does that mean that I can remove DDMD testing job from my
CI? :)
Yes, thanks!
On 9/11/2015 10:25 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Is there any reason why this isn't currently used in the front end?
Lack of testing, focus on matching c-dmd performance, it used to be
blocked and nobody realized it wasn't any more etc.
On 8/11/2015 1:41 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
IMHO enabling D's GC in the frontend is better way to fix leaking in the
CTFE, but there are some issues with that (it segfaults if we enable GC).
Actually I think it's fixed now, just disabled.
It used to have problems with lib*/scan*, but
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
