Yeah, I saw it. I have never been a fan of Sandy and that video pretty much
cemented my low opinion of him. There has never been a larger Musk fanboy
than Sandy. I suppose I ought not argue as opinions about him are just
that. Overall Sandy and his company have done a lot of interesting things
but
The moral of this story is to get good and rich before your lies catch up
to you. Just ask Elon. Nothing he says is ever even remotely the truth and
he's got a habit of vastly inflating his company's value with extravagant,
false claims. Still walks around a free man? Why? Money talks and BS
It sure does sound as if the car detected something wrong with the battery.
It's my understanding that they did the 80% update instead of replacing
packs so that they could see which packs were actually bad and which ones
were not. If your pack isn't bad then it lets you go back to 100% and life
10wh/mi is extremely dubious. It'd be great if that were physically
possible at realistic speeds but it just isn't.
But, my biggest problem with things like the Aptera is really safety. All
other things being equal, safety in a crash comes down to energy transfer.
And, energy is a function of
I have a Bolt EUV and like it. I was somewhat disappointed to see that
they're discontinuing the entire Bolt line at the end of this year.
However, I wouldn't count GM out just yet. They're transitioning to their
Ultium platform instead of continuing to build old-tech Bolts. I like my
Bolt but it
quot; battery
> performs better in cold weather than the original battery. I presume
> both are 24kWh batteries. Do you have warm weather range numbers to
> compare to ?
>
> Peri
>
> << Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
>
> ------ O
Indeed. I've got a 2012 Leaf and a 2013 Leaf. Neither shows much battery
degradation but the 2012 gets about 30-40 miles range in Winter and the
2013 about 40-45 miles range.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 6:16 PM Ken Olum via EV wrote:
> Here is a data point about Leaf batteries at cold temperatures.
I'm not that optimistic about that. The problem with a charging robot
is that it'd have to have a battery around the size of the largest EV
battery to really be effective. A robot with a 100kwh battery will be
the size of Optimus Prime. Then it needs to charge itself afterward.
It really seems
It also should be noted that Tesla increasingly has competition. It
may be true that something like a Chevy Bolt is not quite the car a
Model S is but it does have a radio (satellite radio even),
potentially bose sound, and it drives basically just as far as a Model
S does. Tesla has long had a
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 6:11 PM Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
> I don't have first hand experience using Tesla's autopilot. Assuming you
> are paying attention, then what is it like when autopilot fails and you
> have to take control ? If you are paying attention, it seems to me that
> it might take
That does lead to another potential idea, though. What if an open
source design specifically called for OEM parts that *ARE* easily
available and cheap? This isn't so far-fetched or weird. Tesla uses
Mercedes steering systems and a Ford accelerator pedal. They probably
use other parts from
> > I know, the plural of anecdote isn't data, but I see a lot of comments
> > online from thoughtful, reasonable people who'd like to own EVs, but aren't
> > at all keen on handing their money to Musk.
> >
>
> My wife refuses to test drive a Tesla because she hates Elon's "TechBro"
>
The story is in error. Tesla didn't actually do that on purpose and
nearly immediately pulled the plug once green told everyone about it.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:27 AM Mark Hanson via EV wrote:
>
> Looks like Tesla is being forced into releasing service info from a law
> passed in
It heavily depends on the electrolyte / cell chemistry. I have
batteries from a Think City (made by EnerDel) and they are spec'd to
operate down to an extremely low temperature of -20C. That's -4F. I
don't think I'd charge them very hard at 0F but it seems that's in the
temperature range to be
Yeah, believe me, some of us have built DiY systems that support
CHAdeMO. CCS is a bit (well a lot) harder because of the architecture
so there probably aren't any homebrew CCS. But, it is possible to
repurpose hardware from OEM vehicles and I think people have started
to experiment with using the
They don't include the proper hardware yet, the original story was
wrong. They have diodes in there that would preclude current from
flowing the other way.
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:33 PM Lawrence Rhodes via EV
wrote:
>
>
> https://youtu.be/UQx30FRw1GA On Friday, May 22, 2020, 10:32:59 AM
A lot. The L3 system is CHAdeMO. You need the inlet plug, the high
current wiring, probably the plastic shroud it all goes in, and the
charger it connects to. You can probably grab all of that out of a
wrecked vehicle (hopefully a rear end or side collision) but I still
don't know how much the car
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:55 AM evtlfp20 via EV wrote:
> the eugene auction site shows some leafs with bumper off, but but no
> heavy damage i can see . are bumpers hard to find or really expensive?
My wife... ah... tested this out by backing into a trailer with a 2013
Leaf. The bumper panels
That site loads for me. So, you might try again. The site, at least,
is up and functioning. I have not heard of any troubles with the
company itself either.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:42 AM Jukka Järvinen via EV wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> What's going on with the orionbms.com site? I could not access
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:00 PM Paul Compton via EV wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 04:40, Jan Steinman via EV wrote:
>
> > Supercaps are currently 1-10 farads or so. A farad can supply an amp for a
> > second.
>
> I think you might be a little out of touch on Supercaps.
>
> I've had a sample
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:43 PM Lee Hart via EV wrote:
>
> If fast charging is so vital, how come the market isn't flooded with
> fast chargers for cellphones, laptops, power tools, and all our other
> battery-operated toys?
?!?!?!?! Umm IT IS. The market most certainly is packed full with
I have two leafs here - 2012 and 2013. The 2012 is lucky to get 40
miles of range in the winter. In the summer it's closer to 50 miles.
The 2013 can drive somewhere in the range of about 40-45 miles in
Winter and 60-70 miles in Summer. I wouldn't consider any of that to
be great but that's how it
at you are looking for?
>
> https://www.aeva.asn.au/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4406
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 18:07:03 -0700 Collin Kidder via EV
> wrote
>
> If I'm remembering correctly they did lock the chip so you can't just
> read out the firmw
If I'm remembering correctly they did lock the chip so you can't just
read out the firmware from a working unit. If you could I would, I do
have one. But, if someone happens to have firmware in an email then I
can flash that firmware onto a board. I just don't have any DMOC445
firmware files to
The new one almost certainly had only the test firmware on it - that's
how they came new. You have to use the Azure tools to flash the proper
firmware onto it. Yes, this is not going to be pleasant.
Unfortunately, while I know how to flash DMOCs, I don't believe that
I've got DMOC445 firmware to
DC fast charging is a mess. You have:
1. CHAdeMO. It's currently maxed out at 500v and 125A so 62.5KW but
nobody really can reach that peak. Most battery packs top out at 400v
or so and thus you'd get 400 * 120 = 48KW peak. But, there is a new
CHAdeMO standard that will support up to 400KW. This
Well, you weren't specific but you might have meant CHAdeMO DC fast
charging. I'm going to assume such and if that wasn't the case you'll
have to be more specific.
If you need to produce the car side CHAdeMO comm then you'll need a
way to connect to a CAN bus and you will need two inputs and two
Exactly. A modern EV drive train could be 85-90% efficient from
battery to the road. To improve range by 30% you'd have to get more
than 100% efficiency. There just isn't room for that level of
improvement in the electronics. Now, maybe you could add 30% by
reworking the body to be more
The underlying subtext here seems to be that the UAW would really love
to unionize the Tesla Fremont plant and they believe they've found
their opening. Firing a few hundred people out of 10,000 is not a
significant percentage but talking about it the right way can rile
people up. Seems like much
Can it be done in reverse? Almost certainly it can. The super charger
talks over single wire CAN to the car. People have done some captures.
To the best of my knowledge nobody has tried to charge on a super
charger with an unauthorized device. Doing so is likely to be seen as
theft (of
> I am writing you to ask for advice with the following:
> Can you suggest a supervisory control systems (VMU) that are easy to to
> program that we can use with this system?
GEVCU -> http://store.evtv.me/proddetail.php?prod=gevcu6
I'm not promising it the cheapest thing ever but the software
:
> Sounds like that byte is the battery capacity in 0.5Ah since when new it
> is reported as 66 Ah which would be 132 or 84h and slowly degrading from
> there.
> Cor
>
> > On Jan 27, 2017, at 2:28 AM, Tom Parker via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2
08 383 7626Skype: cor_van_de_water
>>XoIP +31 87 784 1130private: cvandewater.info
>>
>>http://www.proxim.com
>>
>>This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>>and
>>proprietary information of
I have a capture from (I think it was the 2013 Leaf but I have a 2012
as well) and the capture is both buses at the same time. The "normal"
can bus is a lot noisier than the EV bus. It also starts up first and
has a lot of traffic before the EV bus even starts. I need to do some
more filtering to
10 minutes should have been enough. Chris suggested shorting the
positive and negative together to drain any capacitance and force the
ECUs to reset but I cannot imagine an ECU lasting 10 minutes on its
input capacitors. Though, I think that the leaf actually has a super
capacitor behind the rear
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Tom Parker via EV wrote:
> Is anyone trying to reverse engineer the handshake between the Leaf BMS and
> the rest of the car?
I haven't yet. I haven't had any need to swap batteries in a Leaf.
Instead I've added some to the existing pack but
To my knowledge, no one has seriously attempted this yet. There are
links in this thread to the people who are trying to do it with the
ECU, LBC, etc from a Leaf (basically the whole drive and battery
system). But, like you, I'd really rather not have to do this.
However, I have a 2012 driving
I'm pretty well versed in this sort of thing. Yes, it is possible to
use a capture tool and then do various things and try to find them in
the log. Then you try to replay the CAN traffic back to the car and
see if it accepts it. Quite often not as much is locked down with
security codes as you
I've found that the largest issue when the resistor fries is that it
deposits carbon dust all over the place. The BMS in those packs is
*very* picky about leakage currents and will fault with an isolation
fault if you sneeze near the exposed board. When the resistor fries it
soots up the board,
One word of caution though: Some of the cheap OBDII bluetooth dongles
(knockoffs) might not support CAN bus properly. It pays to get the
same dongle as someone you know. Then they can suggest exact versions
that work. Otherwise it might be hit or miss. Though, I've had decent
luck just picking at
The risk seems vastly overblown to me. Unfortunately, lithium
batteries catch fire sometimes. One can do a google search for iphone
fire and find examples there too. The problem is that we all want as
much battery life as possible. This leads to using battery chemistries
that are more energy
I wonder that as well. I'm sure that they're trying to be
ideologically pure but sometimes you have to be willing to play the
game. They could easily find people to run dealerships who will be
cooperative. To some extent the dealerships could be just a formality.
And, anyway, it doesn't hurt to
I must admit, I drive differently with an ICE than an EV. In my ICE
cars I'll go 8-10MPH over the speed limit and try to push the limits.
In EVs I'm much more conservative and try to go the speed limit. I
wonder if this is common? My reasoning is that ICE vehicles tend to
have a lot of waste in
I agree, people can be dangerous. If we could figure out the software
I think self driving cars could be really safe. And, they'd be faster
too because the road could be run with very little gap between cars so
long as all of the cars are communicating and the cars are self
driving. But, being a
Yes, I've had this same trouble with LiFePO4 cells (Thundersky). I
believe that the cases might be ever so slightly conductive. Also, the
car was in a somewhat salty environment by the ocean and sea mist and
dirt caused a build up of conductive material over the top of
everything. So, I cleaned
Most certainly. CHAdeMO is negotiated over CAN so you need a
microprocessor to handle the two way communication. Also, it is
required to have contactors and the charger will check to ensure that
they open and close properly. So, it is a little bit involved. Also,
the charge cord for CHAdeMO is
Yes, there are two CAN buses on the OBDII port. Here's a link to a
discussion about this:
http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?t=4131
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Ed Blackmond via EV wrote:
> Can you use the ODB-II port for this?
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> This message was
I am still around and I've contacted Lejuan directly. Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Cor van de Water via EV
wrote:
> Lejuan,
>
> is contact info is on his website:
> http://www.kk-ev.com/
> also there are some pages about his projects
>
I'm not aware of any OEM system that uses DC motors so I suspect that
your 10kw motor is really a permanent magnet synchronous AC motor.
It's generally never a good idea to try to drive more than one motor
with one controller - even more so if they are PMAC or PMDC since such
motors are very
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:55 AM, via EV wrote:
>
> BTW, I would just buy a used Tesla but I read they are worse than GM about
> who "owns" their cars. I'm afraid they wouldn't reactivate the drivetrain
> after I did the swap. They did that to a guy that rebuilt a wrecked
You're telling me it doesn't?!?! On conversion projects I've done I
always make sure that regen lights up the brake lights. It's just
common sense. I have Think City cars and they don't enable the brake
light on regen. This has caused people to attempt to give the car a
free rectal exam with
for D or D/eco regen.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Ed Blackmond via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:12 AM, Collin Kidder via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
>>
>> I can't believe a big company like Nissan wouldn't have thought
I agree. In addition, corporations, like people, go through phases.
I'm sure many people would not want to be judged by how they were 20
or 30 years ago. You changed, you're a different person now than you
were then. Corporations also get new leaders every so often and their
direction can change.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:41 AM, John Lussmyer via EV ev@lists.evdl.org wrote:
On Wed Jul 08 06:33:52 PDT 2015 ev@lists.evdl.org said:
http://emotorwerks.com/products/online-store/product/show/97-new-chademo-tm-compatible-charge-controller-for-emotorwerks-dc-chargers
That was weird. The forum
Yes, the article that had a blurb on the original post was about an
app that uses the existing API. Tesla has no problem with that. There
was also a link to a story about the $10k hacking contest. This is
totally different. The goal of that contest is to gain unauthorized
access to a Tesla you
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Lawrence Harris via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:
I am afraid I side with Tesla on this. As much as I like to be able to
tinker with 'my stuff' here we have a very complex system with many sensors
and actuators that are all controlled by the onboard computer
and
enjoy your OWNERSHIP as a yard ornament.
Bob
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Collin Kidder via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Lawrence Harris via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:
I am afraid I side with Tesla on this. As much as I like to be able to
tinker
I think that, by this point, we all agree on that point: the buyer did not
receive what he thought he had received. I believe that the company that
sold the salvage car likely did not realize the true situation either. I
would think that the sell would fall into questionable legality given the
It is very common. People buy cars with a salvage title and fix them. Then
they have the car inspected. I believe that the local PD does it in
Michigan. You call the police and have them come out. They make sure that
it has the things it is supposed to (tail lights, turn signals, etc) and
that you
Personally I would hope to keep politics out of it. But, how would not
selling to a Russian EV dealer hurt Putin exactly? This seems to be a
deeply personal decision that every business owner should make for their
own company.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Cruisin via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Ben Goren b...@trumpetpower.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 5:41 AM, Collin Kidder coll...@kkmfg.com wrote:
We've mostly been focused on trying to support the higher end OEM
controllers we've been getting out of bankrupt companies and salvage.
Then...can
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Ben Goren via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:
On Jul 23, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Collin Kidder coll...@kkmfg.com wrote:
You might keep in mind the GEVCU project which can be purchased from EVTV
Ooooh...I like!
Currently it works with DMOC645, Brusa, and Coda
You might keep in mind the GEVCU project which can be purchased from EVTV (
http://store.evtv.me/proddetail.php?prod=gevcucat=23) It is open source
and has enough I/O to do what you want. Of course, what you want is rather
custom so some coding would have to be done. But, the nasty low-level stuff
63 matches
Mail list logo