-
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-18, 10:09:00
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/18/2012 9:16 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
The supreme monad (God) does everything
(God causes all to happen) while the monads,
being entirely passive, can
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-17, 11:26:51
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/17/2012 8:08 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Monads
that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-16, 15:12:07
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 16 Sep 2012, at 13:36, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
All love, all truth, all beauty necessarily
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-16, 11:18:30
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/16/2012 8:31 AM, Roger Clough
have to invent him
so that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-16, 11:34:14
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/16/2012 8:31 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Not sure I
-16, 12:15:31
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/16/2012 8:45 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
My take on the meaning of knowledge of things unseen
is knowledge of what is invisible at the moment.
Hi Roger,
I agree with this definition. It is equivalent
.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-15, 12:47:02
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 15 Sep 2012, at 13:08, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi John Clark
Theology was once called the queen of the sciences,
but that was just
-
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-15, 13:15:26
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/15/2012 8:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Faith is merely trust. I could have faith in a doorknob.
But I wouldn't try faith in Satan.
Even
the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-15, 13:15:26
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/15/2012 8:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Faith is merely trust. I could have faith in a doorknob.
But I wouldn't try faith
, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-14, 15:32:05
Subject: Re: Re: Re: The poverty of computers
On Friday, September 14, 2012 7:10:17 AM UTC-4, rclough
-09-14, 11:16:57
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Theology is a science.
It's a very strange science, it's a science that does not use the scientific
method and, not surprisingly, a science that has discovered
function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-14, 11:27:35
Subject: Re: Re: Re: The poverty of computers
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012? Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Faith is ?o me at least a virtue since it is associated
-list
Time: 2012-09-14, 12:11:35
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/14/2012 7:09 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Faith can be expressed as a belief, but faith itself is inner trust,
confidence, etc.
Faith
Noun:Complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
Strong
Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
9/14/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-13, 13:21:50
Subject: Re: Re: The poverty of computers
no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-13, 10:58:09
Subject: Re: Re: The poverty of computers
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012? Roger Clough wrote:
Theology is based
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Faith is to me at least a virtue since it is associated with hope and
love.
Faith is believing in something when there is absolutely no reason for
doing so; an optimist with faith would believe in things that fill him with
hope
:* everything-list javascript:
*Time:* 2012-09-13, 13:21:50
*Subject:* Re: Re: The poverty of computers
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:43:39 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
The shared part of religion (or science) is called belief(s).
They are exclusively in the fom
.
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-12, 12:47:12
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012? Bruno Marchal wrote:
? makes a bridge between two fields,
? What two fields??
? The study of the notion
: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-13, 08:33:44
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
Hi Roger,
On 12 Sep 2012, at 14:08, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Applying science to religion can be no more successful than
applying science to poetry. Both poetry
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Theology is based on faith
I understand that theology is based on faith, what I don't understand is
why faith is supposed to be a virtue.
and moral practice.
Then why is the history of religion a list of one atrocity after
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:43:39 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
The shared part of religion (or science) is called belief(s).
They are exclusively in the fom of words.
For example words from the Bible, and the Creeds.
The personal or private part of
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:58:10 AM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 Roger Clough rcl...@verizon.net javascript:wrote:
Theology is based on faith
I understand that theology is based on faith, what I don't understand is
why faith is supposed to be a virtue.
I'm
-11, 12:36:24
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
?
God = truth
Certain statements can fool people into thinking they have made a profound
discovery when they have not, they probably work so well because people often
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-12, 05:26:53
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 11 Sep 2012, at 18:42, John Clark wrote
-
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-10, 15:54:00
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 9/10/2012 12:45 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
A better question to John would be: explain where consciousness and universes
Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-09-09, 10:37:05
*Subject:* Re: The poverty of computers
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012� Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
You call yourself an atheist,
I do, but that's only because I also have
content -
From: Jason Resch
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-08, 16:24:35
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:58 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/8/2012 10:17 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM, John Clark johnkcl
: Re: The poverty of computers
Hi Roger,
Brains some years ago had no intellectual or feeling facilities too. It came
by evolution.
Roberto Szabo
2012/9/7 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
Hi Stephen P. King
?
No, machines, even computers,?MHO in practice have no intellectual or feeling
: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-08, 05:35:00
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 07 Sep 2012, at 19:12, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7 2012, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
machines, even computers, IMHO in practice have no intellectual or feeling
facilities, are no more than
Subject: Re: The poverty of computers
On 08 Sep 2012, at 06:19, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/7/2012 8:43 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Platonism (or mathematical realism) is the majority viewpoint of
modern mathematicians.
In a survey of mathematicians I know it is an even division. Of
course
30 matches
Mail list logo
