On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 6:24:03 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 3:41 AM > wrote:
>
>
>> *> not all points external to an observer are receding at speed faster
>> than light. Still, ISTM that inflation just preserves the temperature
>> distribution which exists
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 1:40:22 AM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 5:46:18 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it occurred,
>> why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 1:40:22 AM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 5:46:18 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it occurred,
>> why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka
On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 6:24:03 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 3:41 AM > wrote:
>
>
>> *> not all points external to an observer are receding at speed faster
>> than light. Still, ISTM that inflation just preserves the temperature
>> distribution which exists
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 3:41 AM wrote:
> *> not all points external to an observer are receding at speed faster
> than light. Still, ISTM that inflation just preserves the temperature
> distribution which exists when it began,*
The idea is before inflation a small volume was able to achieve
On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 8:25:11 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 12:43:17 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:53 PM wrote:
>>
>> *> Where does the non conserved energy go, specifically the loss of
>>> energy represented by
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 12:43:17 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:53 PM >
> wrote:
>
> *> Where does the non conserved energy go, specifically the loss of energy
>> represented by the cosmological red shift? AG*
>
>
> If it's non-conserved then the energy went
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:53 PM wrote:
*> Where does the non conserved energy go, specifically the loss of energy
> represented by the cosmological red shift? AG*
If it's non-conserved then the energy went into infinite unbounded
homogeneity, that is to say into nothingness. At the
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 12:17:34 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Bruce Kellett > wrote:
>
> >> If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that existed when
>>> the universe was 10^-44 seconds old and inflation had decayed away when it
>>> was
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 7:28 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that existed when
the universe was 10^-44 seconds old and inflation had decayed away when it
was 10^-35 seconds old then the particle associated with the inflation
field
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 1:23:19 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:01 PM >
> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 12:28:58 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:17 AM John Clark wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Bruce Kellett
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:01 PM wrote:
> On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 12:28:58 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:17 AM John Clark wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Bruce Kellett
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 12:28:58 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:17 AM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Bruce Kellett > > wrote:
>>
>> >> If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that existed when
the universe was 10^-44
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:17 AM John Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
> >> If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that existed when
>>> the universe was 10^-44 seconds old and inflation had decayed away when it
>>> was 10^-35 seconds old then
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:53 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
>> If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that existed when
>> the universe was 10^-44 seconds old and inflation had decayed away when it
>> was 10^-35 seconds old then the particle associated with the inflation
>> field would
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 2:06 AM John Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 5:14 AM Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
> > Why has the inflation not been seen at LHC?
>>>
>>> >> The LHC just went offline, when it comes back online after 2 years
>>> of upgrades it should reach energies close to 15
On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 10:14:13 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:35 PM Bruce Kellett > > wrote:
>>
>> > *You seem to be convinced by inflation theory. *
>>>
>>
>> No I'm just playing devil's advocate. I'm not
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 5:14 AM Bruce Kellett wrote:
> Why has the inflation not been seen at LHC?
>>>
>>
>> >> The LHC just went offline, when it comes back online after 2 years of
>> upgrades it should reach energies close to 15 TeV which corresponds to a
>> temperature of 10^17 Kelvin, and
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:35 PM Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
> > *You seem to be convinced by inflation theory. *
>>
>
> No I'm just playing devil's advocate. I'm not convinced it's right I'm
> just not convinced it's dead wrong as you seem to
On Thursday, December 27, 2018 at 4:43:23 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 3:30:58 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 2:37:59 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/25/2018 4:42 PM,
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 3:30:58 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 2:37:59 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/25/2018 4:42 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 11:26:14 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 at 2:37:59 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/25/2018 4:42 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 11:26:14 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/25/2018 8:01 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 25,
On 12/25/2018 4:42 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 11:26:14 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/25/2018 8:01 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 1:16:53 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:21 PM
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 11:26:14 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/25/2018 8:01 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 1:16:53 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:21 PM wrote:
>>
>> >> You can never prove that any physical
On 12/25/2018 8:01 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 1:16:53 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:21 PM > wrote:
>> You can never prove that any physical quantity is exactly
zero, but we do know from observations
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 1:16:53 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:21 PM > wrote:
>
> >> You can never prove that any physical quantity is exactly zero, but we
>>> do know from observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation that
>>> if the universe is
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:21 PM wrote:
>> You can never prove that any physical quantity is exactly zero, but we
>> do know from observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation that
>> if the universe is curved at all it is by less than one part in 100,000.
>>
>
*> Agreed. However,
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 7:05:10 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 1:53 AM > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 5:57:35 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:27 PM wrote:
>>>
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 1:53 AM wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 5:57:35 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:27 PM wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 2:13:46 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
On Tuesday, December
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 6:53:28 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 5:57:35 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:27 PM wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 2:13:46 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 5:57:35 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:27 PM >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 2:13:46 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 12:35:24 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
On 12/24/2018 3:34 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 10:42:10 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/24/2018 1:04 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC,
agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:27 PM wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 2:13:46 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 12:35:24 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:28 PM wrote:
>>>
On Monday, December
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 2:13:46 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 12:35:24 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:28 PM wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:47:52 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 at 12:35:24 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:28 PM > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:47:52 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:04 PM wrote:
>>>
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 6:28 PM wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:47:52 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:04 PM wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
On Monday, December 24,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:35 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
> *You seem to be convinced by inflation theory. *
>
No I'm just playing devil's advocate. I'm not convinced it's right I'm just
not convinced it's dead wrong as you seem to be.
*> Why has the inflation not been seen at LHC?*
>
The LHC just
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 10:42:10 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/24/2018 1:04 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 6:40:03 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:47:52 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:04 PM > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 6:40:03 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/24/2018 1:04 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 6:40:03 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/23/2018 8:22 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 8:44 AM wrote:
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:35:05 PM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM John Clark wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 5:38 PM Bruce Kellett
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> *> Flatness is explained if the unknown parameter k in the FRW
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:04 PM wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 6:40:03 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/23/2018 8:22 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, December
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:35:05 PM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 5:38 PM Bruce Kellett > > wrote:
>>
>> *> Flatness is explained if the unknown parameter k in the FRW solution
>>> is set to zero. The the universe
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM John Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 5:38 PM Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
> *> Flatness is explained if the unknown parameter k in the FRW solution is
>> set to zero. The the universe is always flat, no need to fine tune. Setting
>> k = 1 or k = -1 is just as
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 8:25:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 6:40:03 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/2018 8:22 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 5:52:21 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 7:47 PM > wrote:
>
> *> **If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane extending
>> infinitely in all directions, as opposed to asymptotically flat like a huge
>> and expanding sphere,
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 6:40:03 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/23/2018 8:22 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> *If by "flat", you mean mathematically
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 5:52:21 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 7:47 PM > wrote:
>
> *> **If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane extending
>> infinitely in all directions, as opposed to asymptotically flat like a huge
>> and expanding sphere,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 7:47 PM wrote:
*> **If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane extending
> infinitely in all directions, as opposed to asymptotically flat like a huge
> and expanding sphere, you have to reconcile an infinitesimally tiny
> universe at the time of the BB,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 5:38 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
*> Flatness is explained if the unknown parameter k in the FRW solution is
> set to zero. The the universe is always flat, no need to fine tune. Setting
> k = 1 or k = -1 is just as fine-tuned or not as k=0.*
>
There are an infinite number of
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 5:22:34 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:02 PM > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:47:02 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:33 PM wrote:
>>>
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:22:24 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
On 12/23/2018 8:33 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:22:24 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*If by "flat", you mean
On 12/23/2018 8:22 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane
extending infinitely in all directions, as opposed to
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 4:02 PM wrote:
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:47:02 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:33 PM wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:22:24 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC,
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane extending
> infinitely in all directions, as opposed to asymptotically flat like a huge
> and expanding sphere,
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:47:02 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:33 PM > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:22:24 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:33 PM wrote:
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:22:24 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> *If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat,
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 4:22:24 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:50:33 AM UTC, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> *If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane extending
>> infinitely
On 12/23/2018 4:47 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
*If by "flat", you mean mathematically flat, like a plane extending
infinitely in all directions, as opposed to asymptotically flat like a
huge and expanding sphere, you have to reconcile an infinitesimally
tiny universe at the time of
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 10:38:00 PM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 1:38 AM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:32 PM Bruce Kellett > > wrote:
>>
>> *> The point is that inflation only solves the problem given certain
>>> initial conditions. We have no
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 1:38 AM John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:32 PM Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
> *> The point is that inflation only solves the problem given certain
>> initial conditions. We have no independent knowledge of those initial
>> conditions, *
>
>
> From observations
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:32 PM Bruce Kellett
wrote:
*> The point is that inflation only solves the problem given certain
> initial conditions. We have no independent knowledge of those initial
> conditions, *
>From observations I think we do have a little knowledge about what those
initial
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 3:27:35 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 3:04:07 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Clark wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:46 AM wrote:
>>>
>>> *> If the temperature was non uniform
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 3:05 PM John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:04 PM Bruce Kellett
> wrote:
>
> >>Regardless of how non-uniform the entire early universe may have been
>>> if you kept looking at smaller and smaller volumes you'd eventually find a
>>> size where thing were pretty
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 10:04 PM Bruce Kellett
wrote:
>>Regardless of how non-uniform the entire early universe may have been if
>> you kept looking at smaller and smaller volumes you'd eventually find a
>> size where thing were pretty uniform.
>>
>
> *> On what do you bas that assumption? *
>
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 3:04:07 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:46 AM >
>> wrote:
>>
>> *> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it
>>> occurred, why would a sudden increase in its
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:46 AM wrote:
>
> *> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it
>> occurred, why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka inflation, erase
>> or wash out those non uniformities?*
>>
>
> Regardless
On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 2:17:14 AM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:46 AM > wrote:
>
> *> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it
>> occurred, why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka inflation, erase
>> or wash out those non
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 10:08:37 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/22/2018 3:46 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> > If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it
> > occurred, why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka inflation,
> > erase or wash out those non
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:46 AM wrote:
*> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it occurred,
> why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka inflation, erase or wash out
> those non uniformities?*
>
Regardless of how non-uniform the entire early universe may have been if
On 12/22/2018 3:46 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it
occurred, why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka inflation,
erase or wash out those non uniformities? ISTM, it would preserve them.
It might preserve them, but it
On Saturday, December 22, 2018 at 11:46:18 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> If the temperature was non uniform when the BB occurred, if it occurred,
> why would a sudden increase in its volume, aka inflation, erase or wash out
> those non uniformities? ISTM, it would preserve them.
72 matches
Mail list logo
